City of Helsinki Social Services

16
City of Helsinki Social Services Matrix Method for Measuring Productivity in Elderly Social Services ENSA, Madrid 2.6.2010 Kari Laakoli, Management accountin City of Helsinki Social Services Department ENSA, Madrid, June 2010 Elderly thematic group meeting Kari Laakoli – City of Helsinki Management accounting advisor E-Mail: [email protected]

description

City of Helsinki Social Services Department. City of Helsinki Social Services. Matrix Method for Measuring Productivity in Elderly Social Services. ENSA, Madrid, June 2010 Elderly thematic group meeting Kari Laakoli – City of Helsinki Management accounting advisor - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of City of Helsinki Social Services

Page 1: City of Helsinki Social Services

City

of H

elsin

ki Socia

l Serv

ices

Matrix Method for

Measuring Productivity

in Elderly Social Services

ENSA, Madrid 2.6.2010 Kari Laakoli, Management accounting

City of Helsinki

Social Services Department

ENSA, Madrid, June 2010

Elderly thematic group meeting

Kari Laakoli – City of HelsinkiManagement accounting advisorE-Mail: [email protected]

Page 2: City of Helsinki Social Services

City

of H

elsin

ki Socia

l Serv

ices

Outline of the presentation

information of the elderly projectsfrom aggregate to disaggregate approachmatrix method

map of productivity affecting factorsprioritized measuresmatrix of service housing

productivity results in service housing in years 2007 - 2009conclusion

ENSA, Madrid 2.6.2010 Kari Laakoli, Management accounting

City of Helsinki

Social Services Department

Page 3: City of Helsinki Social Services

City

of H

elsin

ki Socia

l Serv

ices

Information of the elderly projectspilot projects in the elderly services in years 2007 - 2009

13 units of service housingfour nursing homes

aim was to develop a solution to a productivity measurement problem from a practical field

utilization of workshops as a methodtwo different working teams included

two researcher from Tampere University of Technology3-5 persons of elderly services (unit manager, workers representatives, accounting experts)

followed generic process of designing performance measures

ENSA, Madrid June 2010 Kari Laakoli, Management accounting

City of Helsinki

Social Services Department

Page 4: City of Helsinki Social Services

City

of H

elsin

ki Socia

l Serv

ices

Reference: Jääskeläinen, A. 2009

The matrix methodFrom aggregate to disaggregate approach

Aggregate measures are intended to examine productivity of a large organizational entity or the whole organization

ENSA, Madrid 2.6.2010 Kari Laakoli, Management accounting

City of Helsinki

Social Services Department

Top down Bottom upComponent measures (disaggregate) capture the productivity of a single activity or unit

Social Services Department is rather large organizational entityproductivity measurement was based on output/input indexlimited view when information to the unit level is needed

Page 5: City of Helsinki Social Services

City

of H

elsin

ki Socia

l Serv

ices

The matrix methodFrom aggregate to disaggregate approach

ENSA, Madrid 2.6.2010 Kari Laakoli, Management accounting

City of Helsinki

Social Services Department

Complexity of the system

Social Service System as a whole

Part of the service system (eg. elderly services)

Unit level (eg. Service housing)

Weak view of systemproductivity

Awareness of

productivityphenomenon

Productivity is

understood and known

Productivity-consciousness

•Social Service System is a large organizational entity, state of productivity is difficult to realize and manage, offer little information to unit level• Productivity is realized, but the underlying factors needs to be better understood, measured and managed by objectives• At the unit level productivity and factors involved in the phenomenon should be understood, measured and managed by objectives

Page 6: City of Helsinki Social Services

City

of H

elsin

ki Socia

l Serv

ices

Reference: Jääskeläinen, A. 2009

The matrix methodFrom aggregate to disaggregate approach

ENSA, Madrid 2.6.2010 Kari Laakoli, Management accounting

City of Helsinki

Social Services Department

Bottom-up

Productivity of Child Day care center 1 …

Productivity of Child Care regions

Productivity of Child care Services

Productivity of Social Service Department

Productivity of City of Helsinki

… …

Productivity ofNursing home 1

Productivity ofElderly services

Productivity ofService house 1

the results from different unit are aggregated to the next level focus is to examine a change in total score not the score as such every unit is taken into account by its weighted costs

Page 7: City of Helsinki Social Services

City

of H

elsin

ki Socia

l Serv

ices

The matrix methodMap of different factors affecting productivity

ENSA, Madrid 2.6.2010 Kari Laakoli, Management accounting

City of Helsinki

Social Services Department

Costefficiency

Servicequality

Productivity

References: Jääskeläinen, A. 2009Jääskeläinen, A. & Lönnqvist, A. 2009

Output quantity

Output magnitude

Resources used

Utilizationof employee resources

Workingatmosphere

Employeecompetence

Bedfastresidents %

Functional loss of client %

Atmosphere In Service provision Workers

turnover

Page 8: City of Helsinki Social Services

City

of H

elsin

ki Socia

l Serv

ices

Reference: Jääskeläinen, A. 2009

The matrix methodThe illustration of the measures

ENSA, Madrid 2.6. 2010 Kari Laakoli, Management accounting

City of Helsinki

Social Services Department

Measurement objective MeasureService Housing

Nursing Home

Productivity Cost of calculated care day € 45% 45%Employee resources Work contribution in a year per number of customer bed % 15% 10%Utilization of premises Degree of utilization of premises % 15% 10%Absences of emplyees Percentage of days lost through sickness % (under 60 days) 10% 10%Function of client Functional loss % 15% 15%Function of client Bedfast residents % 10%

100% 100%

Weight value

Page 9: City of Helsinki Social Services

City

of H

elsin

ki Socia

l Serv

ices

Reference: Jääskeläinen, A. 2009

The matrix methodThe illustration of the service housing matrix

ENSA, Madrid 2.6.2010 Kari Laakoli, Management accounting

City of Helsinki

Social Services Department

Unit cost of calculated care €

work input in year per number

customer bed

degree of utilization of premises

rate of short sickness

absences %

percentage of customer with deteriorating

conditionMeasurement result 23,21 0,36 94 3,79 11,8

10 12 0,28 100 3 109 12,5 0,29 99,9 3,2 148 13 0,3 99,7 3,4 187 14 0,31 99,5 3,7 226 15 0,34 99 4 265 16 0,37 97 4,5 304 17 0,4 95 5 343 19 0,5 92,5 6 402 21 0,6 90 7 471 23 0,7 85 8 550 25 0,8 80 10 65

Score 0 5 3 6 9Weight 45 15 15 10 15

Weighted score 0 75 45 60 135

Total score 315

Page 10: City of Helsinki Social Services

City

of H

elsin

ki Socia

l Serv

ices

The matrix methodProductivity measurements in service housing

ENSA, Madrid 2.6.2010 Kari Laakoli, Management accounting

City of Helsinki

Social Services Department

top level 900 - 1000 pontisextraordinary level 700 - 800 pointsgood level 500 – 600 pointsaverage level 400 points

0100200300400500600700800900

1000 2008

2009

Page 11: City of Helsinki Social Services

City

of H

elsin

ki Socia

l Serv

ices

The matrix methodProductivity index in service housing

ENSA, Madrid 2.6.2010 Kari Laakoli, Management accounting

City of Helsinki

Social Services Department

index 09/08

0255075

100125150175200

index 09/08level describing productivity development =100

Page 12: City of Helsinki Social Services

City

of H

elsin

ki Socia

l Serv

ices

Reference: Jääskeläinen, A. 2009

ConclusionThe matrix method provides:

tool for managerial purposesone index calculated from several productivity-related indicatorseasy to understand what factors have influenced the indexthe matrix is not very complex:

the measurement method is transparent to every employeeshows what a good result isbenchmarking to other units using similar matrixpotential tool for supporting payment by results

ENSA, Madrid 2.6.2010 Kari Laakoli, Management accounting

City of Helsinki

Social Services Department

Page 13: City of Helsinki Social Services

City

of H

elsin

ki Socia

l Serv

ices

Thank you for your attention and interest.

ENSA, Madrid 2.6.2010 Kari Laakoli, Management accounting

City of Helsinki

Social Services Department

Page 14: City of Helsinki Social Services

City

of H

elsin

ki Socia

l Serv

ices

References: Jääskeläinen A. 2009. ”Identifying a Suitable Approach for Measuring and Managing Public Service Productivity”, Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol 7, No. 4 pp. 447-458. Jääskeläinen, A. & Lönnqvist, A. 2009. ”Designing Operative Productivity Measures in Public Services”, VINE – Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 55-67.

www.interrai.org

ENSA, Madrid 2.6.2010 Kari Laakoli, Management accounting

City of Helsinki

Social Services Department

Page 15: City of Helsinki Social Services

City

of H

elsin

ki Socia

l Serv

ices

Reference: Jääskeläinen, A. 2009

Productivity in the elderly servicesConverting values

Current costs (nominal) were converted to real costs (constant) by the PIPE index (Price index of public expenditure)

PIPE Producer: Statistics Finland, Homepage: http://tilastokeskus.fi/til/jmhi/index_en.html

ENSA, Madrid 2.6.2010 Kari Laakoli, Management accounting

City of Helsinki

Social Services Department

Weighting of the outputService housing

Client payment grouping (grouping is based on given service hours per month) Groups 1-6 where one elderly client in group six equate six elderly client in group one

Nursing homesRUG-III/34 grouping (hierarchical structure) Cost weigh of client structure (based on clinical status)

average client has weight 1; weight 1,3 means that client need 30% more resources

Page 16: City of Helsinki Social Services

City

of H

elsin

ki Socia

l Serv

ices

Reference: Jääskeläinen, A. 2009

The matrix methodConstructing a productivity matrix

ENSA, Madrid 2.6.2010 Kari Laakoli, Management accounting

City of Helsinki

Social Services Department

prioritize the measuresthe experience and context specific knowledge importantstatistical study to support the decision of the weightsto finalize matrix

collect a measurement data from each measure (previous 3 years)scaling the matrix 0 – 10

average result got a score of 4Scores 0 and 10 defined in a way that only single units had such scores

current values of measurements was necessary information