Chronic temporomandibular joint dysfunction: an area of debate...TMJ pain: (a) masticatory pain...

9
Page 1 of 9 Review Licensee OA Publishing London 2012. Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) Competing interests: none declared. Conflict of interests: none declared. All authors contributed to the conception, design, and preparation of the manuscript, as well as read and approved the final manuscript. All authors abide by the Association for Medical Ethics (AME) ethical rules of disclosure. F��: Kafas P, Dalabiras S, Hamdoon Z. Chronic temporomandibular joint dysfunction: an area of debate. Hard Tissue. 2012 Nov 10 1(1):3. Chronic temporomandibular joint dysfunction: an area of debate P Kafas 1 *, S Dalabiras 2 , Z Hamdoon 3 Abstract Introduction Temporomandibular joint dysfunctio- ns present with a variety of symptoms that comprise pain in the joint and its surroundings, jaw clicking, limited jaw opening or locking and head- aches. The management of chr-onic temporomandibular joint dysfu- nction may be defined as simple or complex. The preference of the treat- ment, based on the aetiology, may be characterized as psychosomatic or operational. Conservative treatment is helpful in most cases. This up-to- date review focuses on the pathog- enesis and management of this multi- factorial clinical entity. Conclusion Chronic TMD is a complex clinical condition of yet unknown pathogen- esis. Further research is required to investigate the aetiological patterns. On examination, the most com- mon features are tenderness upon palpation of the joint or muscles of mastication, diminished mouth open- ing, side-to-side movement and click- ing or grating sounds in the joint upon movements of the mandible 4,5 . Lack of tenderness in the external auditory canal could be an additional diagnos- tic feature of the pain syndrome 4 . An acute episode of pain generally has a sudden onset due to local tissue inflammation and it usually resolves within 4–12 weeks 6 . The conversion from acute to chronic pain may result from the body’s inability to restore normal physiological function 7,8 . Historically, there have been several TMD classifications emphasizing either mechanical or psychological concepts. Classifying TMD has been a difficult task and several suggestions exist in the literature. One of the oldest classification sys- tems distinguishes two categories of TMJ pain: (a) masticatory pain (muscle- related) and (b) TMJ arthralgia (joint- related). The former is subdivided into splinting, spastic and inflammatory pain while the latter into discal, retrodiscal, capsular and arthropathic pain 9,10 . Later, TMJ non-arthritic arthral- gia was re-classified as a deep somatic pain of disc attachment 11 . Currently, the Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC)/TMD is the most ac- cepted classification; it was reported by Dworkin and LeResche 12 and it dif- ferentiates the TMD entities along two axes. The first axis (axis I) refers to the clinical evaluation of TMD con- ditions. It is divided into three main groups: (a) muscular involvement, (b) disc displacement and (c) arthritic origin of the condition. The second axis (axis II) considers pain-related disability and psychological status in association with TMD 12 . Good to ex- cellent reliability results were found using these criteria in an adolescent study for each category of RDC/ TMD 13 . RDC/TMD and, more specifi- cally, the jaw disability checklist, eval- uates the jaw function and determines in depth the extent of interference caused by TMD 12 . Eating, yawning and chewing were found to be the most common jaw functions that interfered with TMJ using RDC/TMD 14,15 . Another classification, reported by Goldstein 16 , separates the condition into general groups of: (a) rheumatoid changes with synovitis, (b) arthralgia, (c) condylar degeneration, (d) open bite deformity, (e) chronic pain with link to behaviour, (f) myofascial pain and dysfunction and (g) internal derangement with displacement and reduction. A more recent classifica- tion system, reported by Ogle and Hertz 17 and which relates TMD to masticatory myofascial pain in asso- ciation to TMJ pain with or without joint sounds, suggests that myofascial pain dysfunction, masticatory myal- gia, masticatory myositis, tendonitis and whiplash TMJ are all variations of the myofascial pain syndromes. This review discusses the impact of different factors on chronic TMJ dysfunction. Pathogenesis There is a lack of scientific evidence regarding the pathological origin of chronic TMJ dysfunction, and aetiology is unknown in up to 95% cases 16 . Cur- rently, there are observation studies indicating a multi-part aetiology of the disease. Nowadays, the involvement of psychological factors in the aetiology of many TMJ disorders is well estab- lished; these implicate emotion, behaviour and personality disorders as major contributors to the pain dysfunction syndrome 18 . Furthermore, * Corresponding author Email: [email protected] 1 Department of Oral Surgery and Radiology, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece 2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece 3 UCLH Head and Neck Unit, University College London Hospitals, London, UK Oral & Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery Introduction Temporomandibular joint dysfuncti- on (TMD) is a common condition aff- ecting up to 33% of population 1 . It is characterized as a unilateral or bilat- eral pain in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and its associated craniof- acial musculature 2 ; in addition, there could be joint clicking, limited mouth open-ing or locking, headaches, tinnitus, ear fullness and popping 3 .

Transcript of Chronic temporomandibular joint dysfunction: an area of debate...TMJ pain: (a) masticatory pain...

  • Page 1 of 9

    Review

    Licensee OA Publishing London 2012. Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY)

    Com

    petin

    g in

    tere

    sts:

    non

    e de

    clar

    ed. C

    onfli

    ct o

    f int

    eres

    ts: n

    one

    decl

    ared

    .A

    ll au

    thor

    s co

    ntrib

    uted

    to th

    e co

    ncep

    tion,

    des

    ign,

    and

    pre

    para

    tion

    of th

    e m

    anus

    crip

    t, a

    s w

    ell a

    s re

    ad a

    nd a

    ppro

    ved

    the

    final

    man

    uscr

    ipt.

    All

    auth

    ors

    abid

    e by

    the

    Ass

    ocia

    tion

    for M

    edic

    al E

    thic

    s (A

    ME)

    eth

    ical

    rule

    s of

    dis

    clos

    ure.

    F�� �������� ��������: Kafas P, Dalabiras S, Hamdoon Z. Chronic temporomandibular joint dysfunction: an area of debate. Hard Tissue. 2012 Nov 10 1(1):3.

    Chronic temporomandibular joint dysfunction: an area of debate P Kafas1*, S Dalabiras2, Z Hamdoon3

    AbstractIntroductionTemporomandibular joint dysfunctio-ns present with a variety of symptoms that comprise pain in the joint and its surroundings, jaw clicking, limited jaw opening or locking and head-aches. The management of chr-onic temporomandibular joint dysfu-nction may be defined as simple or complex. The preference of the treat-ment, based on the aetiology, may be characterized as psychosomatic or operational. Conservative treatment is helpful in most cases. This up-to-date review focuses on the pathog-enesis and management of this multi-factorial clinical entity. ConclusionChronic TMD is a complex clinical condition of yet unknown pathogen- esis. Further research is required to investigate the aetiological patterns.

    On examination, the most com-mon features are tenderness upon

    palpation of the joint or muscles of mastication, diminished mouth open-ing, side-to-side movement and click-ing or grating sounds in the joint upon movements of the mandible4,5. Lack of tenderness in the external auditory canal could be an additional diagnos-tic feature of the pain syndrome4.

    An acute episode of pain generally has a sudden onset due to local tissue inflammation and it usually resolves within 4–12 weeks6. The conversion from acute to chronic pain may result from the body’s inability to restore normal physiological function7,8.

    Historically, there have been several TMD classifications emphasizing either mechanical or psychological concepts. Classifying TMD has been a difficult task and several suggestions exist in the literature.

    One of the oldest classification sys-tems distinguishes two categories of TMJ pain: (a) masticatory pain (muscle-related) and (b) TMJ arthralgia (joint-related). The former is subdivided into splinting, spastic and inflammatory pain while the latter into discal, retrodiscal, capsular and arthropathic pain9,10. Later, TMJ non-arthritic arthral-gia was re-classified as a deep somatic pain of disc attachment11.

    Currently, the Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC)/TMD is the most ac-cepted classification; it was reported by Dworkin and LeResche12 and it dif-ferentiates the TMD entities along two axes. The first axis (axis I) refers to the clinical evaluation of TMD con-ditions. It is divided into three main groups: (a) muscular involvement, (b) disc displacement and (c) arthritic origin of the condition. The second axis (axis II) considers pain-related disability and psychological status in association with TMD12. Good to ex-cellent reliability results were found using these criteria in an adolescent

    study for each category of RDC/TMD13. RDC/TMD and, more specifi-cally, the jaw disability checklist, eval-uates the jaw function and determines in depth the extent of interference caused by TMD12. Eating, yawning and chewing were found to be the most common jaw functions that interfered with TMJ using RDC/TMD14,15.

    Another classification, reported by Goldstein16, separates the condition into general groups of: (a) rheumatoid changes with synovitis, (b) arthralgia, (c) condylar degeneration, (d) open bite deformity, (e) chronic pain with link to behaviour, (f) myofascial pain and dysfunction and (g) internal derangement with displacement and reduction. A more recent classifica-tion system, reported by Ogle and Hertz17 and which relates TMD to masticatory myofascial pain in asso-ciation to TMJ pain with or without joint sounds, suggests that myofascial pain dysfunction, masticatory myal-gia, masticatory myositis, tendonitis and whiplash TMJ are all variations of the myofascial pain syndromes. This review discusses the impact of different factors on chronic TMJ dysfunction.

    PathogenesisThere is a lack of scientific evidence regarding the pathological origin of chronic TMJ dysfunction, and aetiology is unknown in up to 95% cases16. Cur-rently, there are observation studies indicating a multi-part aetiology of the disease.

    Nowadays, the involvement of psychological factors in the aetiology of many TMJ disorders is well estab-lished; these implicate emotion, behaviour and personality disorders as major contributors to the pain dysfunction syndrome18. Furthermore,

    * Corresponding authorEmail: [email protected] Department of Oral Surgery and Radiology,

    School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece

    2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece

    3 UCLH Head and Neck Unit, University College London Hospitals, London, UK

    Oral

    & C

    rani

    o-M

    axill

    ofac

    ial

    Surg

    ery

    IntroductionTemporomandibular joint dysfuncti-on (TMD) is a common condition aff-ecting up to 33% of population1. It is characterized as a unilateral or bilat-eral pain in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and its associated craniof-acial musculature2; in addition, there could be joint clicking, limited mouth open-ing or locking, headaches, tinnitus, ear fullness and popping3.

  • Page 2 of 9

    Review

    Licensee OA Publishing London 2012. Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY)

    Com

    petin

    g in

    tere

    sts:

    non

    e de

    clar

    ed. C

    onfli

    ct o

    f int

    eres

    ts: n

    one

    decl

    ared

    .A

    ll au

    thor

    s co

    ntrib

    uted

    to th

    e co

    ncep

    tion,

    des

    ign,

    and

    pre

    para

    tion

    of th

    e m

    anus

    crip

    t, a

    s w

    ell a

    s re

    ad a

    nd a

    ppro

    ved

    the

    final

    man

    uscr

    ipt.

    All

    auth

    ors

    abid

    e by

    the

    Ass

    ocia

    tion

    for M

    edic

    al E

    thic

    s (A

    ME)

    eth

    ical

    rule

    s of

    dis

    clos

    ure.

    F�� �������� ��������: Kafas P, Dalabiras S, Hamdoon Z. Chronic temporomandibular joint dysfunction: an area of debate. Hard Tissue. 2012 Nov 10 1(1):3.

    trauma, parafunctional habits, multi-ple dental extractions, somatization and female gender were identified as risk factors in patients with myofas-cial pain as well as in subjects with concurrent myofascial pain and arthralgia19,20.

    TraumaTMJ injuries can be direct or indirect and micro- or macro-traumatic. The reaction of the mandible to whiplash injury may induce tearing in TMJ ligaments, which tends to affect mainly the temporalis and masseter by the sudden protrusion and retro-positioning of the mandible in re-sponse to the rapid deceleration of the motor vehicle17. Other traumas of TMJ could be related to scuba diving, childbirth, endotracheal intubation, violin playing, direct blow and ‘banana peel’ slip21,22. The parafunctional hab-its such as chewing gums, biting nails and pencils and grinding teeth may cause microtrauma, which in chronic existence of the stimulus, may induce pain and various sounds of TMJ (i.e. clicking, crepitation). Because sounds of the joint are not always pathognomonic, the necessity of assessing the condition carefully is essential. In general, past trauma of the head and neck region may be a contributing factor of the joint disa-bility23,24. Trauma patients may show higher psychological disability than non-trauma patients25, thereby em-phasizing the psychological role in this disorder.

    Psychological factorsIt is well known that pain disorders may be directly or indirectly associ-ated with the psychological status of an individual. However, the question whether chronic pain is caused by an existing psychological condition or vice versa cannot be easily answered. Presence of widespread pain (neck-ache, backache, irritable bowel syn-drome or other non-head and neck chronic myalgia disorders), or pain outside the masticatory system are a

    risk factor for chronic TMD pain among women26. This means that pain in multiple body sites was sig-nificantly more common in TMD group compared with control group27. This association possibly indicates a role of psychological factors in TMJ disorders in addition to the well-understood somatic causes of the related condi-tions, including hormonal effects. The occurrence of TMD symptoms was also found to be related to work and social factors28.

    Psychological factors play a more prominent role when the pain is of muscular origin14,15,29 and are consid-ered to be a major issues in the onset, exacerbation or perpetuation of the pain30. This theory is partly supported by scientific evidence, concluding that the perpetuation of chronic pain is influenced by psychosocial implica-tions31. In a study group, the muscular tenderness of the masticatory system was found to be correlated with facial pain32. It is also identified that these patients are more distressed by cephalalgias14,15. The cause of muscu-lar involvement seems to be related to fatigue from chronic parafunctional habits secondary to psychological stress conditions4. Patients who develop chronic TMD appear to have more psychosocial distress before diagnosis of chronicity than those individuals who have acute symp-toms that subside33. The demograph-ics, emotion, behaviour and cognition, as general factors from the psycho-logical point of view, may predict the treatment outcome31. Women who developed chronic TMD were signifi-cantly more likely to be diagnosed as having a muscle disorder than those who did not develop chronic TMD33. Furthermore, it is important to note that about 50% of low-mood (depressed) individuals have pain as a current complain at examination34. Depression and catastrophizing contribute to the progression of TMJ pain; therefore, they should be considered as important factors35. The need for psychological assessment

    should be emphasized for the pa-tients’ benefit.

    In a study with a control group, a history of physical or sexual abuse was reported in 44.8% of diseased (TMD) group; a percentage that is slightly greater than the control group36. Physical abuse in females seems to be worse than sexual abuse, as supported by the enhanced pres-ence of symptoms such as pain, anxi-ety and depression37. Patients with a history of both physical and sexual abuse in childhood suffered from more depression38. Taken together, the above observations indicate a possible synergistic effect between these two entities.

    GenderCompared with males, chronic TMJ dysfunction is more prevalent in females of reproductive age, with the prevalence being up to 80%39. Chronic facial pain is also more common in women, accounting for 75% cases11. The high prevalence of TMD in women is supported by several studies19,28,40–44. Interestingly, subjective symptoms such as pain are more frequently reported by females, while objective disabilities such as diminished jaw opening and masticatory disability more commonly affect males45. The uneven valence of TMJ disease between the two genders is not currently understood. Three main theories have been suggested implicating the hormonal factor, pain signal process and need for seeking medical care45–47.

    The involvement of sex hormones in the pathology of TMJ pain derives mainly from observations correlating the intake of post-menopausal hor-mones with an increased risk for TMD development40. Furthermore, women who report orofacial pain are more likely to report symptoms associated with menstruation41. Though the precise pathogenesis of the disease is unknown, the activation of cytokine production via oestrogen receptors in TMJs of females has been suggested to explain the hormonal involvement33,46.

  • Page 3 of 9

    Review

    Licensee OA Publishing London 2012. Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY)

    Com

    petin

    g in

    tere

    sts:

    non

    e de

    clar

    ed. C

    onfli

    ct o

    f int

    eres

    ts: n

    one

    decl

    ared

    .A

    ll au

    thor

    s co

    ntrib

    uted

    to th

    e co

    ncep

    tion,

    des

    ign,

    and

    pre

    para

    tion

    of th

    e m

    anus

    crip

    t, a

    s w

    ell a

    s re

    ad a

    nd a

    ppro

    ved

    the

    final

    man

    uscr

    ipt.

    All

    auth

    ors

    abid

    e by

    the

    Ass

    ocia

    tion

    for M

    edic

    al E

    thic

    s (A

    ME)

    eth

    ical

    rule

    s of

    dis

    clos

    ure.

    F�� �������� ��������: Kafas P, Dalabiras S, Hamdoon Z. Chronic temporomandibular joint dysfunction: an area of debate. Hard Tissue. 2012 Nov 10 1(1):3.

    Another possible explanation is based on the general suggestion that men and women may not process pain sig-nals in the same manner, developing a different perception and reaction to pain between the two sexes48.

    Finally, the fact that women seek healthcare for pain more often than men also contributes to the existing high prevalence of TMD in women47. Although TMD is more prevalent in women, men appear to have greater prevalence of objective difficulties such as jaw opening and masticatory disability than women45,49.

    MalocclusionThe role of occlusion in the pathogen-esis of TMD is still controversial. Some authors support the theory that the functional patterns of malocclu-sion correlate to TMD. The findings from the studies in favour of this the-ory include the following: (a) relation of mandibular prognathism to TMJ symptoms50 and (b) reduction of symptoms in Angle class II retrocclu-sion post-operatively50,51; however, in none of the studies, the results were statistically significant. Furthermore, it was shown that orthodontic treat-ment leading to extensive changes in the occlusion was not associated with the development of TMD16,20.

    Stronger evidence comes from studies supporting that occlusion is not considered to be a significant fac-tor for the pathogenesis of TMD52–54. The negative correlation of occlusion with TMD symptoms was established in an observational study with two groups of individuals, one with nor-mal occlusion and the other with mal-occlusion with no statistical difference between the two cohorts55.

    Occlusal malfunction such as brux-ism has not been found to induce TMD56,57. Moreover, bruxismic activity was not correlated with myalgias57. The predictors of the two compo-nents of bruxism, clenching during daytime and nocturnal grinding, were not the same indicating that these two entities may be different58. The

    explanation here is that more than 60% of bruxismic individuals pre-sented with TMD59. Overall, there is unsufficient evidence to implicate occlusion patterns in the pathogene-sis of TMD16.

    DiscussionThe authors have referenced some of their own studies in this review. These referenced studies have been conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (1964) and the protocols of these studies have been approved by the relevant ethics committees related to the institution in which they were performed. All human subjects, in these referenced studies, gave informed consent to participate in these studies.

    Psychosomatic approaches Informed reassuranceInformed reassurance, as a psycho-logical technique, is an explanation of the disease status either in verbal or written form. This should be done in ‘layman’ terms to facilitate under-standing by the patient. The technique of reassurance has been found to be very useful in around 80% cases when used in conjunction with simple analgesics, physiotherapy and occlusal splints60. Informed reassurance and placebo were found to be equally ef-fective in relieving symptoms in 45% cases61. Early discussion and inter-vention may prevent the development of chronicity43,62. It is important to mention that only 2% to 5% of all patients treated for TMJ disorders undergo surgery, thereby emphasiz-ing that majority of patients receive conservative management63 with 70% reporting good outcome64. Most of these patients suffered from stress and pain other than TMD and were found to be sensitive to reassurance65.

    Mind–body therapyStress was found to be an important factor in the genesis of musculoskeletal

    disorders with techniques such as yoga to relieve individual stress and leading to a state of relaxation66. Eval-uation of this technique was difficult due to transpersonal and philosophi-cal dimensions66. Yoga, hypnosis, relaxation, meditation, imagery and biofeedback are considered as mind–body therapies67,68,69.

    The anxiety and pain complex may be the most common indication for dental hypnosis70. Although hypnotic-induced reduction in frequency, duration and intensity of TMD pain has been observed71, there is no sig-nificant difference in analgesia with the addition of suggestion under hypnosis72. Another suggestion that hypnosis could be effective for the treatment of a wide range of acute and recurring painful conditions should be considered73.

    In general, relaxation and imagery techniques are not clearly understood in the treatment of both acute and chronic pain syndromes. Individuals with strong religious beliefs or other objections should be excluded from these alternatives74. A possible target of relaxation is to control the sympathetic nervous system where decreasing function reduces metabolic activity 75.

    Cognitive–behavioural therapy Any patient with long-term pain may benefit from cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT), which is divided into cognitive restructuring and coping skills training76. The inter-related components of the treatment are edu-cation, skill acquisition, cognitive and behavioural rehearsal, homework, generalization and maintenance77. A recent randomized clinical trial concludes that after 6 sessions of CBT, patients with enhanced psychological and social disability showed improve-ment in pain variables78. Combination treatment of cognitive skills training and biofeedback were more effective in comparison with the use of these alternatives alone79. Individuals who suffered from dysfunctional profiles or patterns of TMD, in other terms

  • Page 4 of 9

    Review

    Licensee OA Publishing London 2012. Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY)

    Com

    petin

    g in

    tere

    sts:

    non

    e de

    clar

    ed. C

    onfli

    ct o

    f int

    eres

    ts: n

    one

    decl

    ared

    .A

    ll au

    thor

    s co

    ntrib

    uted

    to th

    e co

    ncep

    tion,

    des

    ign,

    and

    pre

    para

    tion

    of th

    e m

    anus

    crip

    t, a

    s w

    ell a

    s re

    ad a

    nd a

    ppro

    ved

    the

    final

    man

    uscr

    ipt.

    All

    auth

    ors

    abid

    e by

    the

    Ass

    ocia

    tion

    for M

    edic

    al E

    thic

    s (A

    ME)

    eth

    ical

    rule

    s of

    dis

    clos

    ure.

    F�� �������� ��������: Kafas P, Dalabiras S, Hamdoon Z. Chronic temporomandibular joint dysfunction: an area of debate. Hard Tissue. 2012 Nov 10 1(1):3.

    high distress and pain, were associated with both failure of conservative and surgical treatment80. Additionally, patients with dysfunctional pain did not benefit from brief CBT81. The need for more research in this field has been emphasized82.

    Combining biofeedback with intra-oral appliances was more favourable in comparison with each treatment alone in reducing pain, hence sup-porting the concept of combined management83. In a study designed with a pre-test and post-test control groups, the use of habit reversal treat-ment for TMD revealed that reduction in pain was accompanied by a reduc-tion in oral habits with minimal clini-cal contact84.

    Operational approaches Occlusal therapiesOcclusal therapies can be subdivided into occlusal adjustment and appli-ances. Occlusal adjustment is an irre-versible alteration of occlusion and it has been used for the treatment of TMD without a sound literature supporting its efficacy85. The role of occlusal adjustment was considered to be the decompression of the con-dyle in the articulating fossa, but research showed that there is no increase in joint space during clench-ing86. A study showed that occlusal adjustment was not convincing for the alleviation of symptoms of chronic TMD because of the non-powerful experimental evidence87. Thus, occlusal adjustment cannot be recommended for the management of TMD88–90.

    Occlusal splints, as two major types of removable orthopaedic appliances, can be distinguished into reposition-ing and stabilization appliances; the former is used to decrease pain, clicking and secondary muscular symptoms, while the latter is mainly indicated for muscular relaxation and protection of teeth91. Occlusal splints can be further classified as permissive and non-permissive92. The efficacy of occlusal appliances is based on the reduction of the electromyographic

    activity and in modification of the parafunctional behaviour93–95. A rand-omized controlled trial concluded that stabilization appliances are more effective in the myalgia type of the disorder, with regard to reduction in symptoms and signs96, while the role of anterior repositioning splints is restricted mainly in joints with arthralgia and painful click97.

    In general, occlusal appliances are found to be significantly effective in pain reduction than the combined treatment alternative of informed reas-surance and relaxation98. Failure of occlusal splint therapy to resolve symp-toms, particularly pain, may be related to psychological implications59.

    Prolonged splint wear may induce remodelling and even TMJ injury, as in-dicated in a study involving miniature pigs99. Therefore, splints can be con-structed as an initial form of therapy60. These appliances are suggested to have equivalent effect when compared with placebo94,95.

    Although splint therapy and occlusal adjustment have been extensively used, there is no evidence to suggest that they can be curative. A number of evidence-based trials have concluded that these appliances should not be suggested as part of routine care.

    Pharmacological modalitiesThe medications reported to be effec-tive in the management of TMD are non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, anti-depressants, mus-cle relaxants, sedative hypnotics, botu-linum toxin and capsaicin100–103. Opiates have been used for a long time for pain control, especially in chronic condi-tions104. Intra-articular morphine has been used in a randomized double blind study showing a significant increase in pain threshold in the dis-eased joint105. Anti-depressants such as tricyclics have been shown to produce effective pain relief at low dosage amongst chronic cases, a good example being amitriptyline and nortriptyl-ine106,107. Tricyclic anti-depressants are central analgesics acting by inhibition

    of serotonin re-uptake, norepinephrine and α2-receptor blockade108,109. Treat-ment with anti-depressants cannot be expected to give immediate pain relief because of the delayed onset of their ac-tion which usually takes 4–6 weeks110. Corticosteroids can be injected or applied topically in cases of condylar erosion, myalgia and trismus with rela-tively positive therapeutic results99,111.

    A randomized controlled trial did not support the use of botulinum toxin A in patients with moderate to severe chronic muscular type of pain, concluding that these patients had less wide jaw opening compared with a placebo group112. A similar design study showed that the topical appli-cation of capsaicin is statistically insignificant when compared with the placebo effect113.

    PhysiotherapyA study of complementary and alter-native medicine showed that massage is rated as the most frequent and amongst the most effective treatment modalities114. This approach seems to be more effective in sub-acute and chronic non-specific conditions115. Others characterize massage as inef-fective for pain in general due to lack of scientific evidence115.

    Heat and cold techniques (lasers, diathermy, microwaves and ice packs) and therapeutic ultrasound may be used to relieve musculoskeletal pain. These methods have been found effective through a ‘counter-irritant’ mechanism, by relaxing the muscle and reducing the spindle response, respectively116.

    Management with electrotherapy remains controversial due to the lack of high evidence-based studies114. There is no substantial improvement of TMD signs and symptoms when managed with transelectrical nerve stimulation59. An electromyographic study revealed that an imbalance of the masticatory muscles may lead to clicking, locking, headaches, earaches and deviation of the mandible. It was suggested that this finding could be

  • Page 5 of 9

    Review

    Licensee OA Publishing London 2012. Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY)

    Com

    petin

    g in

    tere

    sts:

    non

    e de

    clar

    ed. C

    onfli

    ct o

    f int

    eres

    ts: n

    one

    decl

    ared

    .A

    ll au

    thor

    s co

    ntrib

    uted

    to th

    e co

    ncep

    tion,

    des

    ign,

    and

    pre

    para

    tion

    of th

    e m

    anus

    crip

    t, a

    s w

    ell a

    s re

    ad a

    nd a

    ppro

    ved

    the

    final

    man

    uscr

    ipt.

    All

    auth

    ors

    abid

    e by

    the

    Ass

    ocia

    tion

    for M

    edic

    al E

    thic

    s (A

    ME)

    eth

    ical

    rule

    s of

    dis

    clos

    ure.

    F�� �������� ��������: Kafas P, Dalabiras S, Hamdoon Z. Chronic temporomandibular joint dysfunction: an area of debate. Hard Tissue. 2012 Nov 10 1(1):3.

    beneficial for the management of masseteric involvement using neuro-muscular electrostimulation of the weakened muscle117. The use of micro-current stimulation and mid-laser were significantly better than the placebo effect118. Silver spike point electrotherapy combined with occlusal splint was found to be a favourable treatment outcome inter-vention (good response in 90% pa-tients)119. Alternatively, no statistically significant results were identified in randomized controlled trials in pa-tients receiving electrogalvanic stim-ulation120, low-level laser121, pulsed radio-frequency and pulsed electro-magnetic fields122,123.

    AcupunctureThe use of acupuncture in TMJ pain management seems to be positive, although the analgesic effect of this technique is still under considera-tion124. It has been suggested that acupuncture is comparable to con-servative treatment alternatives125. The use of acupuncture in combina-tion with occlusal splint and point injection was found to be useful for managing TMD126. The level of analge-sia induced by this method may be modified by stress and anxiety127. It is worth noting that electrical stimula-tion of acupuncture needles in com-parison with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation has not shown any significant difference128. A recent meta-analysis has shown limited evidence that acupuncture is effective for treat-ing temporomandibular disorders129.

    SurgeryLess than 8% of facial arthromyalgia cases require surgery130. The surgical approach should be considered in pa-tients diagnosed with advanced inter-nal derangement caused by ankylosis or severe degenerative joint disease with no improvement after conserva-tive methods63.

    Surgical procedures such as arthos-copy, arthocentesis, interpositional grafting, arthrotomy and arthroplasty

    can be helpful in certain situations where adherence to indications and limitations are observed63,131,132. TMJ arthroscopy with added arthrocente-sis and morphine injection in the joint compartment can be associated with symptom relief for up to 10 years. The most recently published National Institute for Health and Clinical Excel-lence guidelines did not support total joint replacement due to lack of good long-term outcome.

    ConclusionChronic TMD is a complex clinical condition of yet unknown pathogen-esis. Further research is required to investigate the aetiological patterns of this disorder. Management of TMD requires a multi-disciplinary approach. Working as a team of dentists, maxil-lofacial surgeons, psychologists, psy-chiatrists and physiotherapists, with interest in pain disorders, can lead to the development of a successful ther-apeutic strategy for the management of TMD patients.

    References1. Dworkin SF, Huggins KH, LeResche L,Von Korff M, Howard J, Truelove E, et al. Epidemiology of signs and symptoms in temporomandibular disorders: clinical signs in cases and controls. J Am Dent Assoc. 1990 Mar;120(3):273–81.2. Harris M, Feinmann C, Wise M, Treasure F. Temporomandibular joint and orofacial pain: clinical and medicolegal management problems. Br Dent J. 1993 Feb;174(4):129–36.3. Feinmann C, Harrison S. Liaison psychia-try and psychology in dentistry. J Psycho-som Res. 1997 Nov;43(5):467–76.4. Klineberg I, editor. Craniomandibu-lar disorders and orofacial pain. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1991.5. Drangsholt M, LeResche L. Temporo-mandibular disorder pain. In: Crombie IK, editor. Epidemiology of pain. Seattle (WA): IASP Press; 1999. p203–33.6. Cousins M. Acute and postoperativepain. In: Wall PD, Melzack R, editors. Text-book of pain. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1994. p357–85.7. Jerjes W, Upile T, Abbas S, Kafas P,Vourvachis M, Rob J, et al. Muscle

    disorders and dentition-related aspects in temporomandibular disorders: contro-versies in the most commonly used treat-ment modalities. Int Arch Med. 2008 Oct;1(1):23.8. Loeser JD, Melzack R. Pain: an overview. Lancet. 1999 May;353(9164):1607–9.9. Bell WE. Masticatory pain symptoms.In: Bell WE, editor. Clinical management of temporomandibular disorders. 1st ed. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers; 1982. p81–98.10. Bell WE. Standards of normal. In: Bell WE, editor. Clinical management of tem-poromandibular disorders. 1st ed. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers; 1982.p68–80.11. Bell WE. Temporomandibular jointpains. In: Bell WE, editor. Orofacial pains: classification, diagnosis, management. 3rd ed. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers; 1989. p285–331.12. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Researchdiagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Cranioman-dib Disord. 1992 Fall;6(4):301–55.13. Wahlund K, List T, Dworkin SF. Tempo-romandibular disorders in children and adolescents: reliability of a questionnaire, clinical examination, and diagnosis. J Orofac Pain. 1998 Winter;12(1):42–51.14. Yap AU, Chua EK, Hoe JK. Clinical TMD, pain-related disability and psychological status of TMD patients. J Oral Rehabil. 2002 Apr;29(4):374–80.15. Yap AU, Tan KB, Chua EK, Tan HH.Depression and somatization in patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Pros-thet Dent. 2002 Nov;88(5):479–84.16. Goldstein BH. Temporomandibulardisorders: a review of current understand-ing. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999 Oct;88(4):379–85.17. Ogle OE, Hertz MB. Myofascial pain.Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2000;12:217–31.18. Ogus HD, Toller PA, editors. Commondisorders of the temporomandibular joint. Bristol: John Wright & Sons; 1986.19. Huang GJ, LeResche L, Critchlow CW,Martin MD, Drangsholt MT. Risk factors for diagnostic subgroups of painful tem-poromandibular disorders (TMD). J Dent Res. 2002 Apr;81(4):284–8.20. Conti A, Freitas M, Conti P, Henriques J, Janson G. Relationship between signs and symptoms of temporomandibular

  • Page 6 of 9

    Review

    Licensee OA Publishing London 2012. Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY)

    Com

    petin

    g in

    tere

    sts:

    non

    e de

    clar

    ed. C

    onfli

    ct o

    f int

    eres

    ts: n

    one

    decl

    ared

    .A

    ll au

    thor

    s co

    ntrib

    uted

    to th

    e co

    ncep

    tion,

    des

    ign,

    and

    pre

    para

    tion

    of th

    e m

    anus

    crip

    t, a

    s w

    ell a

    s re

    ad a

    nd a

    ppro

    ved

    the

    final

    man

    uscr

    ipt.

    All

    auth

    ors

    abid

    e by

    the

    Ass

    ocia

    tion

    for M

    edic

    al E

    thic

    s (A

    ME)

    eth

    ical

    rule

    s of

    dis

    clos

    ure.

    F�� �������� ��������: Kafas P, Dalabiras S, Hamdoon Z. Chronic temporomandibular joint dysfunction: an area of debate. Hard Tissue. 2012 Nov 10 1(1):3.

    disorders and orthodontic treatment: a cross-sectional study. Angle Orthod. 2003 Aug;73(4):411–7.21. Goldman JR. Soft tissue trauma. In: Temporomandibular disorders: diagnosis and treatment. Kaplan AS, Assael LA, edi-tors. 1st ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1991. p190–223.22. Epstein JB, Klasser GD, Kolbinson DA,Mehta SA. Orofacial injuries due to trauma following motor vehicle collisions: part 2. Temporomandibular disorders. J Can Dent Assoc. 2010;76:a172.23. Velly AM, Gornitsky M, Philippe P.Contributing factors to chronic myofascial pain: a case-control study. Pain. 2003 Aug;104(3):491–9.24. Klobas L, Tegelberg A, Axelsson S.Symptoms and signs of temporomandibu-lar disorders in individuals with chronic whiplash-associated disorders. Swed Dent J. 2004;28(1):29–36.25. Steed PA, Wexler GB. Temporoman-dibular disorders—traumatic etiology vs. nontraumatic etiology: a clinical and methodological inquiry into symptoma-tology and treatment outcomes. Cranio. 2001 Jul;19(3):188–94.26. John MT, Miglioretti DL, LeResche L,Von Korff M, Critchlow CW. Widespread pain as a risk factor for dysfunctional temporomandibular disorder pain. Pain. 2003 Apr;102(3):257–63.27. List T, Wahlund K, Larsson B. Psychoso-cial functioning and dental factors in adoles-cents with temporomandibular disorders: a case-control study. J Orofac Pain. 2001 Summer;15(3):218–27.28. Rantala MA, Ahlberg J, Suvinen TI,Nissinen M, Lindholm H, Savolainen A, et al. Temporomandibular joint related painless symptoms, orofacial pain, neck pain, headache, and psychosocial factors among non-patients. Acta Odontol Scand. 2003 Aug;61(4):217–22.29. Auerbach SM, Laskin DM, Frantsve LM, Orr T. Depression, pain, exposure to stressful life events, and long-term out-comes in temporomandibular disorder patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001 Jun;59(6):628–33.30. Neligh GL. Somatoform and associated disorders. In: Scully JH, editor. NMS psy-chiatry. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Williams & Wilkins; 1996. p167–93.31. Fricton JR, Olsen T. Predictors of out-come for treatment of temporomandibu-lar disorders. J Orofac Pain. 1996 Winter;10(1):54–65.

    32. Sipila K, Zitting P, Siira P, Laukkanen P, Jarvelin MR, Oikarinen KS, et al. Temporo-mandibular disorders, occlusion, and neck pain in subjects with facial pain: a case-control study. Cranio. 2002 Jul;20(3):158–64.33. Phillips JM, Gatchel RJ, Wesley AL, Ellis E 3rd. Clinical implications of sex in acute temporomandibular disorders. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001 Jan;132(1):49–57.34. Feinmann C. Personality, mood, and psychiatric disorders. In: Scully C, editor. Oxford handbook of applied dental sci-ences. 1st ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002. p604–8.35. Velly AM, Look JO, Carlson C, Lenton PA,Kang W, Holcroft CA, et al. The effect of catastrophizing and depression on chronic pain—a prospective cohort study of tem-poromandibular muscle and joint pain dis-orders. Pain. 2011 Oct;152(10):2377–83.36. Fillingim RB, Maixner W, Sigurdsson A, Kincaid S. Sexual and physical abuse his-tory in subjects with temporomandibu-lar disorders: relationship to clinical variables, pain sensitivity, and psycho-logic factors. J Orofac Pain. 1997 Winter;11(1):48–57.37. Campbell LC, Riley JL 3rd, Kashikar-Zuck S, Gremillion H, Robinson ME. Somatic, affective, and pain characteris-tics of TMD patients with sexual versus physical abuse histories. J Orofac Pain. 2000 Spring;14(2):112–9.38. Goldberg RT. Childhood abuse, depres-sion, and chronic pain. Clin J Pain. 1994 Dec;10(4):277–81.39. Warren MP, Fried JL. Temporomandib-ular disorders and hormones in women. Cells Tissues Organs. 2001;169(3):187–92.40. LeResche L, Saunders K, Von Korff MR,Barlow W, Dworkin SF. Use of exogenous hormones and risk of temporomandibular disorder pain. Pain. 1997 Jan;69(1-2):153–60.41. Macfarlane TV, Blinkhorn AS, DaviesRM, Kincey J, Worthington HV. Association between female hormonal factors and oro-facial pain: study in the community. Pain. 2002 May;97(1-2):5–10.42. Rauhala K, Oikarinen KS, Jarvelin MR,Raustia AM. Facial pain and temporoman-dibular disorders: an epidemiological study of the Northern Finland 1966 Birth Cohort. Cranio. 2000 Jan;18(1):40–6.43. Epker J, Gatchel RJ, Ellis E 3rd. A model for predicting chronic TMD: practical application in clinical settings. J Am Dent Assoc. 1999 Oct;130(10):1470–5.

    44. Poveda-Roda R, Bagan JV, Sanchis JM,Carbonell E. Temporomandibular disor-ders. A case-control study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012 Sep;17(5):e794–800.45. Johansson A, Unell L, Carlsson GE,Soderfeld B, Halling A. Gender difference in symptoms related to temporomandibu-lar disorders in a population of 50-year-old subjects. J Orofac Pain. 2003 Winter;17(1):29–35.46. Gollehon SG, Spagnoli DB. Temporo-mandibular disorders and facial pain: Biochemical and biomechanical basis. In: Abubaker AO, Benson KJ, editors. Oral and maxillofacial surgery secrets. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus; 2001.p238–41.47. Tashiro A, Okamoto K, Bereiter DA.Rapid estrogenic effects on TMJ-respon-sive brainstem neurons. J Dent Res. 2012 Feb;91(2):210–4.48. Bradbury J. Why do men and womenfeel and react to pain differently? Research suggests men and women may not process pain signals the same way. Lancet. 2003 Jun;361(9374):2052–3.49. LeResche L. Gender, cultural and envi-ronmental aspects of pain. In: Loeser JD, editor. Bonica’s management of pain. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001.p191–5.50. Kobayashi T, Honma K, Izumi K,Hayashi T, Shingaki S, Nakajima T. Tempo-romandibular joint symptoms and disc displacement in patients with mandibular prognathism. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999 Dec;37(6):455–8.51. Rodrigues-Garcia RC, Sakai S, Rugh JD,Hatch JP, Tiner BD, Van Sickels JE, et al. Effects of major class II occlusal correc-tions on temporomandibular signs and symptoms. J Orofac Pain. 1998 Summer;12(3):185–92.52. Kitai N, Takada K, Yasuda Y, VerdonckA, Carels C. Pain and other cardinal TMJ dysfunction symptoms: a longitudinal survey of Japanese female adolescents. J Oral Rehabil. 1997 Oct;24(10):741–8.53. Minagi S, Ohtsuki H, Sato T, Ishii A. Effect of balancing-side occlusion on the ipsilateral TMJ dynamics under clenching. J Oral Rehabil. 1997 Jan;24(1):57–62.54. Goldstein BH. Temporomandibular dis-orders: a review of current understanding. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999 Oct;88(4):379–85.55. Matsumoto MA, Matsumoto W,Bolognese AM. Study of the signs and symp-toms of temporomandibular dysfunction in

  • Page 7 of 9

    Review

    Licensee OA Publishing London 2012. Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY)

    Com

    petin

    g in

    tere

    sts:

    non

    e de

    clar

    ed. C

    onfli

    ct o

    f int

    eres

    ts: n

    one

    decl

    ared

    .A

    ll au

    thor

    s co

    ntrib

    uted

    to th

    e co

    ncep

    tion,

    des

    ign,

    and

    pre

    para

    tion

    of th

    e m

    anus

    crip

    t, a

    s w

    ell a

    s re

    ad a

    nd a

    ppro

    ved

    the

    final

    man

    uscr

    ipt.

    All

    auth

    ors

    abid

    e by

    the

    Ass

    ocia

    tion

    for M

    edic

    al E

    thic

    s (A

    ME)

    eth

    ical

    rule

    s of

    dis

    clos

    ure.

    F�� �������� ��������: Kafas P, Dalabiras S, Hamdoon Z. Chronic temporomandibular joint dysfunction: an area of debate. Hard Tissue. 2012 Nov 10 1(1):3.

    individuals with normal occlusion and mal-occlusion. Cranio. 2002 Oct;20(4):274–81.56. John MT, Frank H, Lobbezoo F, Drang-sholt M, Dette KE. No association between incisal tooth wear and temporomandibu-lar disorders. J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Feb;87(2):197–203.57. Pergamalian A, Rudy TE, Zaki HS,Greco CM. The association between wear facets, bruxism, and severity of facial pain in patients with temporomandibular dis-orders. J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Aug;90(2):194–200.58. Carlsson GE, Egermark I, MagnussonT. Predictors of bruxism, other oral parafunctionals, and tooth wear over a 20-year follow-up period. J Orofac Pain. 2003 Winter;17(1):50–7.59. Alvarez-Arenal A, Junquera LM,Fernandez JP, Gonzalez I, Olay S. Effect of occlusal splint and transcutaneous elec-tric nerve stimulation on the signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disor-ders in patients with bruxism. J Oral Reha-bil. 2002 Sep;29(9):858–63.60. Mitchell L, Mitchell DA. Oral medicine.In: Mitchell L, Mitchell DA, Nattress B, editors. Oxford handbook of clinical den-tistry. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1999. p438–89.61. Feinmann C, Harris M. Psychogenicfacial pain. Part 2: management and prog-nosis. Br Dent J. 1984 Mar;156(6):205–8.62. Newton-John T, Madland G, FeinmannC. Chronic idiopathic orofacial pain: II. What can the general dental practitioner do? Br Dent J. 2001 Jul;191(2):72–3.63. Mazzonetto R, Gollehon SG, Spagnoli DB. Temporomandibular joint anatomy, pathophysiology, and surgical treatment. In: Abubaker AO, Benson KJ, editors. Oral and maxillofacial surgery secrets. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus; 2001.p231–7.64. Feinmann C. The long-term outcomeof facial pain treatment. J Psychosom Res. 1993 May;37(4):381–7.65. Harris M. Medical versus surgicalmanagement of temporomandibular joint pain and dysfunction. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987 Apr;25(2):113–20.66. Gura ST. Yoga for stress reduction andinjury prevention at work. Work. 2002;19(1):3–7.67. Nespor K. Pain management and yoga. Int J Psychosom. 1991;38(1-4):76–81.68. Astin JA. Mind-body therapies for themanagement of pain. Clin J Pain. 2004 Feb;20(1):27–32.

    69. Abrahamsen R, Baad-Hansen L,Zachariae R, Svensson P. Effect of hypno-sis on pain and blink reflexes in patients with painful temporomandibular disor-ders. Clin J Pain. 2011 May;27(4):344–51.70. Schaerlaekens M. Hypnosis and den-tistry: water and fire? Rev Belge Med Dent. 2003;58(2):118–25. French.71. Simon EP, Lewis DM. Medical hypnosis for temporomandibular disorders: treat-ment efficacy and medical utilization out-come. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 2000 Jul;90(1):54–63.72. Gáspár J, Linninger M, Kaán B, BálintM, Fejérdy L, Fábián TK. Effectiveness of standardized suggestions in dental hyp-nosis. Fogorv Sz. 2003 Oct;96(5):205–10. Hungarian.73. Barber J. Hypnosis. In: Loeser JD, editor. Bonica’s management of pain. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001. p1768–78.74. Syrjala KL, Relaxation and imagerytechniques. In: Loeser JD, editor. Bonica’s management of pain. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001.p1779–88.75. Jessup BA, Gallegos X. Relaxation andbiofeedback. In: Wall PD, Melzack R, edi-tors. Textbook of pain. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1994. p1321–36.76. Turner JA, Romano JM. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for chronic pain. In: Loeser JD, editor. Bonica’s management of pain. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001. p1751–8.77. Turk DC, Rudy TE. A Cognitive-behavioral perspective on chronic pain: beyond the scalpel and syringe. In: Tollison DC, Satterthwaite JR, Tollison JW, editors. Hand-book of pain management. 1st ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1994. p136–51.78. Dworkin SF, Turner JA, Mancl L,Wilson L, Massoth D, Huggins KH, et al. A randomized clinical trial of a tailored comprehensive care treatment program for temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain. 2002 Fall;16(4):259–76.79. Gardea MA, Gatchel RJ, Mishra KD.Long-term efficacy of biobehavioral treat-ment of temporomandibular disorders. J Behav Med. 2001 Aug;24(4):341–59.80. Dahlstrom L, Widmark G, Carlsson SG.Cognitive-behavioral profiles among dif-ferent categories of orofacial pain patients: diagnostic and treatment implications. Eur J Oral Sci. 1997 Oct;105(5 Pt 1):377–83.81. Dworkin SF, Turner JA, Wilson L,Massoth D, Whitney C, Huggins KH, et al.

    Brief group cognitive-behavioral inter-vention for temporomandibular disorders. Pain. 1994 Nov;59(2):175–87.82. Turner JA, Whitney C, Dworkin SF,Massoth D, Wilson L. Do changes in patient beliefs and coping strategies predict temporomandibular disorder treatment outcomes? Clin J Pain. 1995 Sep;11(3):177–88.83. Turk DC, Zaki HS, Rudy TE. Effects of intraoral appliance and biofeedback/stress management alone and in combi-nation in treating pain and depression in patients with temporomandibular disor-ders. J Prosthet Dent. 1993 Aug;70(2):158–64.84. Townsen D, Nicholson RA, Buenaver L, Bush F, Gramling S. Use of a habit reversal treatment for temporomandibular pain in a minimal therapist contact format. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2001 Dec;32(4):221–39.85. Kirveskari P. The role of occlusaladjustment in the management of tempo-romandibular disorders. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997 Jan;83(1):87–90.86. Kuboki T, Azuma Y, Orsini MG, Hirooka T, Yatani H, Yamashita A. The effect of occlusal appliances and clenching on the temporomandibular joint space. J Orofac Pain. 1997 Winter;11(1):67–77.87. Tsukiyama Y, Baba K, Clark GT. Anevidence-based assessment of occlusal adjustment as a treatment for temporo-mandibular disorders. J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Jul;86(1):57–66.88. Koh H, Robinson PG. Occlusal adjust-ment for treating and preventing temporo-mandibular joint disorders. J Oral Rehabil. 2004 Apr;31(4):287–92.89. Koh H, Robinson PG. Occlusal adjust-ment for treating and preventing temporomandibular joint disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(1):CD003812.90. Tsukiyama Y, Baba K, Clark GT. Anevidence-based assessment of occlusal adjustment as a treatment for temporo-mandibular disorders. J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Jul;86(1):57–66.91. Yap AU. Effects of stabilization appli-ances on nocturnal parafunctional activi-ties in patients with and without signs of temporomandibular disorders. J Oral Rehabil. 1998 Jan;25(1):64–8.92. Dylina TJ. A common-sense approachto splint therapy. J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Nov;86(5):539–45.

  • Page 8 of 9

    Review

    Licensee OA Publishing London 2012. Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY)

    Com

    petin

    g in

    tere

    sts:

    non

    e de

    clar

    ed. C

    onfli

    ct o

    f int

    eres

    ts: n

    one

    decl

    ared

    .A

    ll au

    thor

    s co

    ntrib

    uted

    to th

    e co

    ncep

    tion,

    des

    ign,

    and

    pre

    para

    tion

    of th

    e m

    anus

    crip

    t, a

    s w

    ell a

    s re

    ad a

    nd a

    ppro

    ved

    the

    final

    man

    uscr

    ipt.

    All

    auth

    ors

    abid

    e by

    the

    Ass

    ocia

    tion

    for M

    edic

    al E

    thic

    s (A

    ME)

    eth

    ical

    rule

    s of

    dis

    clos

    ure.

    F�� �������� ��������: Kafas P, Dalabiras S, Hamdoon Z. Chronic temporomandibular joint dysfunction: an area of debate. Hard Tissue. 2012 Nov 10 1(1):3.

    93. Dao TT, Lavigne GJ. Oral splints: the crutches for temporomandibular disor-ders and bruxism? Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1998;9(3):345–61.94. Raphael KG, Klausner JJ, Nayak S,Marbach JJ. Complementary and alterna-tive therapy use by patients with myofas-cial temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain. 2003 Winter;17(1):36–41.95. Raphael KG, Marbach JJ, Klausner JJ,Teaford MF, Fischoff DK. Is bruxism sever-ity a predictor of oral splint efficacy in patients with myofascial face pain? J Oral Rehabil. 2003 Jan;30(1):17–29.96. Ekberg E, Vallon D, Nilner M. The effi-cacy of appliance therapy in patients with temporomandibular disorders of mainly myogenous origin. A randomized, controlled, short-term trial. J Orofac Pain. 2003 Spring;17(2):133–9.97. Major PW, Nebbe B. Use and effective-ness of splint appliance therapy: review of literature. Cranio. 1997 Apr;15(2):159–66.98. Wahlund K, List T, Larsson B. Treat-ment of temporomandibular disorders among adolescents: a comparison between occlusal appliance, relaxation training, and brief information. Acta Odontol Scand. 2003 Aug;61(4):203–11.99. Sindelar BJ, Edwards S, Herring SW.Morphologic changes in the TMJ following splint wear. Anat Rec. 2002 Mar;266(3):167–76.100. Dionne RA. Pharmacologic treat-ments for temporomandibular disorders. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997 Jan;83(1):134–42.101. Freund B, Schwartz M, Symington JM. Botulinum toxin: new treatment for tem-poromandibular disorders. Br J Oral Maxil-lofac Surg. 2000 Oct;38(5):466–71.102. Winocur E, Gavish A, Halachmi M, Eli I, Gazit E. Topical application of capsai-cin for the treatment of localized pain in the temporomandibular joint area. J Orofac Pain. 2000 Winter;14(1):31–6.103. Denglehem C, Maes JM, Raoul G, Ferri J. Botulinum toxin A: analgesic treatment for temporomandibular joint disorders. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac. 2012 Feb;113(1):27–31.104. MacPherson RD. The pharmacological basis of contemporary pain management. Pharmacol Ther. 2000 Nov;88(2):163–85.105. List T, Tegelberg A, Haraldson T, Isacsson G. Intra-articular morphine as analgesic in temporomandibular joint

    arthralgia/osteoarthritis. Pain. 2001 Dec;94(3):275–82.106. Plesh O, Curtis D, Levine J, McCall WD Jr. Amitriptyline treatment of chronic pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Oral Rehabil. 2000 Oct;27(10):834–41.107. McQuay HJ, Tramer M, Nye BA, Carroll D, Wiffen PJ, Moore RA. A systematic review of antidepressants in neuropathic pain. Pain. 1996 Dec;68(2-3):217–27.108. Sudoh Y, Cahoon EE, Gerner P, Wang GK. Tricyclic antidepressants as long-acting local anesthetics. Pain. 2003 May;103(1–2):49–55.109. Pettengill CA, Reisner-Keller L. The use of tricyclic antidepressants for the control of chronic orofacial pain. Cranio. 1997 Jan;15(1):53–6.110. Skolnick P. Antidepressants for the new millennium. Eur J Pharmacol. 1999 Jun;375(1-3):31–40.111. Nixdorf DR, Heo G, Major PW. Rand-omized controlled trial of botulinum toxin A for chronic myogenous orofacial pain. Pain. 2002 Oct;99(3):465–73.112. Samiee A, Sabzerou D, Edalatpajouh F, Clark GT, Ram S. Temporomandibular joint injection with corticosteroid and local anesthetic for limited mouth opening. J Oral Sci. 2011 Sep;53(3):321–5.113. DeBar LL, Vuckovic N, Schneider J, Ritenbaugh C. Use of complementary and alternative medicine for temporomandibu-lar disorders. J Orofac Pain. 2003 Summer;17(3):224–36.114. Hanada EY. Efficacy of rehabilitative therapy in regional musculoskeletal con-ditions. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2003 Feb;17(1):151–66.115. Ernst E. Manual therapies for pain control: chiropractic and massage. Clin J Pain. 2004 Jan–Feb;20(1):8–12.116. Lehmann JF, de Lateur BJ. Ultrasound, shortwave, microwave, laser, superficial heat and cold in the treatment of pain. In: Wall PD, Melzack R, editors. Textbook of pain. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Living-stone; 1994. p1237–49.117. Bevilaqua-Grosso D, Monteiro-Pedro V, De Jesus Guirro RR, Berzin F. A physio-therapeutic approach to craniomandibu-lar disorders: a case report. J Oral Rehabil. 2002 Mar;29(3):268–73.118. Bertolucci LE, Grey T. Clinical com-parative study of microcurrent electrical stimulation to mid-laser and placebo treatment in degenerative joint disease of

    the temporomandibular joint. Cranio. 1995 Apr;13(2):116–20.119. Sugimoto K, Konda T, Shimahara M, Hyodo M, Kitade T. A clinical study on SSP (silver spike point) electro-therapy com-bined with splint therapy for temporo-mandibular joint dysfunction. Acupunct Electrother Res. 1995 Jan–Mar;20(1):7–13.120. Payne JA. The effects of electrogal-vanic stimulation therapy on masticatory muscle dysfunction as determined by the pantronic reproducibility index. J Oral Rehabil. 1994 Jan;21(1):95–102.121. Kulekcioglu S, Sivrioglu K, Ozcan O, Parlak M. Effectiveness of low-level laser therapy in temporomandibular disorder. Scand J Rheumatol. 2003;32(2):114–8.122. Al-Badawi EA, Mehta N, Forgione AG, Lobo SL, Zawawi KH. Efficacy of pulsed radio frequency energy therapy in tempo-romandibular joint pain and dysfunction. Cranio. 2004 Jan;22(1):10–20.123. Peroz I, Chun YH, Karageorgi G, Schwerin C, Bernhardt O, Roulet JF, et al. A multicenter clinical trial on the use of pulsed electromagnetic fields in the treatment of temporomandibular disor-ders. J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Feb;91(2):180–7.124. Rosted P. The use of acupuncture in dentistry: a review of the scientific validity of published papers. Oral Dis. 1998 Jun;4(2):100–4.125. Myers CD, White BA, Heft MW. A review of complementary and alternative medicine use for treating chronic facial pain. J Am Dent Assoc. 2002 Sep;133(9):1189–96; quiz 1259–60.126. Wong YK, Cheng J. A case series of temporomandibular disorders treated with acupuncture, occlusal splint and point in-jection therapy. Acupunct Med. 2003 Dec;21(4):138–49.127. Widerstrom-Noga E, Dyrehag LE, Borglum-Jensen L, Aslund PG, Wenneberg B, Andersson SA. Pain threshold responses to two different modes of sensory stimu-lation in patients with orofacial muscular pain: psychologic considerations. J Orofac Pain. 1998 Winter;12(1):27–34.128. Butler SH, Chapman CR. Acupunc-ture. In: Loeser JD, editor. Bonica’s man-agement of pain. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001.p1832–41.129. Türp JC. Limited evidence that acupuncture is effective for treating

  • Page 9 of 9

    Review

    Licensee OA Publishing London 2012. Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY)

    Com

    petin

    g in

    tere

    sts:

    non

    e de

    clar

    ed. C

    onfli

    ct o

    f int

    eres

    ts: n

    one

    decl

    ared

    .A

    ll au

    thor

    s co

    ntrib

    uted

    to th

    e co

    ncep

    tion,

    des

    ign,

    and

    pre

    para

    tion

    of th

    e m

    anus

    crip

    t, a

    s w

    ell a

    s re

    ad a

    nd a

    ppro

    ved

    the

    final

    man

    uscr

    ipt.

    All

    auth

    ors

    abid

    e by

    the

    Ass

    ocia

    tion

    for M

    edic

    al E

    thic

    s (A

    ME)

    eth

    ical

    rule

    s of

    dis

    clos

    ure.

    F�� �������� ��������: Kafas P, Dalabiras S, Hamdoon Z. Chronic temporomandibular joint dysfunction: an area of debate. Hard Tissue. 2012 Nov 10 1(1):3.

    temporomandibular disorders. Evid Based Dent. 2011;12(3):89.130. Ryan D, Ahmed S, Harris M. Arthroto-mography and the surgical correction of temporomandibular disorders. Br

    J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990 Aug;28(4):228–33.131. Assael LA. Arthrotomy for internal derangements. In: Assael LA, editor. Temporomandibular disorders: diagnosis

    and treatment. 1st ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1991.p663–79.132. Hoffman D, Moses J, Topper D. Temporomandibular joint surgery. Dent Clin North Am. 1991 Jan;35(1):89–107.