By: Shevy Fernando, Olivia Kurtz, Tori Martin, Matthew Menditto , Christopher Sears
Christopher Martin University of Wisconsin – Green Bay.
-
Upload
rosamund-black -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Christopher Martin University of Wisconsin – Green Bay.
Christopher Martin
University of Wisconsin – Green Bay
How to Succeed at Not Succeeding
(and still learn something from it)
Weekly Journals relating logical principles, arguments, or fallacies to my students’ lived
experiences will help them to better understand, appreciate, and utilize the various argumentative
techniques discussed in my course.
Weekly Journals AssignmentSome Examples:
My roommate referred to Macho Man Randy Savage in order to … and in so doing committed the genetic fallacy by …
My girlfriend made a faulty appeal to authority when …My boss displayed an awareness of physical possibility
when he fired me for …
Hypothesis I have yet to Support(and probably won’t):
Concept Comprehension Question Example:
What does it mean to characterize a person as a collection of ‘person-stages’?
Fallacy and ArgumentRecognition
Methodological Principlesof Arguments
Concept Comprehension
Basic Logical Principles
Applying Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy
Fallacy / Argument Recognition Question Example
What kind of argument is the following: “Many smaller creatures exhibit behaviors such as personal preferences or avoidance of pain. Because humans exhibit these same kinds of behaviors, and because we attribute them to our being conscious, it stands to reason that these smaller creatures are conscious.”
Argument Evaluation
Fallacy and ArgumentRecognition
Methodological Principlesof Arguments
Concept Comprehension
Basic Logical Principles
Applying Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy
Argument Evaluation Question Example
Suppose Sam attempts to persuade Gretchen that there is an afterlife by noting that if she refuses to believe in this then God will not save her, and she will then spend an eternal afterlife in Hell (or some such unpleasant state). Is Sam's argument persuasive?
Method: Compare Mean Difference per Question Type from Fall ‘12 to Spring ‘13
Argument Evaluation = .08
Fallacy and Argument Recognition = -.05
Methodological Principles = -.03
Concept Comprehension = .02
Basic Logical Principles = .01
First Conclusion: As evinced by their scores on
multiple-choice questions, either not enough time
has elapsed to determine whether weekly journals
assignments are helping students to better
understand and appreciate the efficacy of logical
thinking or, what is far worse, such exercises
simply do not help them to develop this skill.
Saving Grace: Weekly Journals helped students to write better composed and more informed essays on their Midterm Exam
Midterm Essay:
Fall 2012: 0.72
Spring 2013:
0.84
Difference: 0.12
Quiz 1 Quiz 2 Midterm0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5
Epiphany: Am I asking too much too soon?
Future Intentions
(1) Better write and distribute quiz questions so as to move
upward, gradually, through Bloom’s taxonomy.
(2) Continue Weekly Journals.
(3) Structure earlier journal assignments to target concept
acquisition and build increasing degrees of argument
recognition and evaluation into later assignments .
(4) Pray that more writing eventually increases fallacy and
argument recognition and critical evaluation.