Christie Documents Exhibit c

download Christie Documents Exhibit c

of 33

Transcript of Christie Documents Exhibit c

  • 8/13/2019 Christie Documents Exhibit c

    1/33

    EXHIBIT C

    Submitted to the Transportation, P ublic W orks and

    Independent A uthorities Committee

    from

    Robert Durando

  • 8/13/2019 Christie Documents Exhibit c

    2/33

    THE PORT AUTHORITY OF NY& NJ

    December 19,2013

    Mr. Charles A. Buono, J r.

    Office of L egislative Services

    State of N ew J ersey

    State House Annex

    P.O. Box 068

    Trenton, N ew J ersey 08625

    Dear Mr. Buono:

    This letter is in response to the subpoena duces tecum, dated December 12, 2013, issuedto Robert Durando by the A ssembly Transportation, Public Works and Independent A uthorities

    Committee (the Committee). The documents, Bates stamped PA - RD - 000001 to PA - RD -

    000031, which resulted from a search of Port A uthority records, are responsive to the

    Committees request for all documents and correspondence, produced between A ugust 1, 2013

    and the present date between the named parties concerning the reduction from three to one of the

    eastbound Fort Lee, N ew J ersey access lanes to the George Washington Br idge from September

    9, 2013 through September 13, 2013. The documents are also responsive to the oral requests

    made of Mr. Durando at the Committees hearing on December 9,2013.

    I f you have any questions concerning the foregoing, kindly call me.

    V ery truly yours.

    David R. K romm

    DRK/pg

    D irect D ial: (212) 435-3483

  • 8/13/2019 Christie Documents Exhibit c

    3/33

    Re.txtFrom: wi1dstei n, DavidSent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 8:49 PM

    To: Durando, Robertsubject: Re:

    Thanks, enjoy the day of f

    - - - - - original Message -----From: Durando, RobertSent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 08:36 PM

    To: M ildstein, DavidSubject:

    Good Evening,I mout of the of f ice tomorrow on a v-day,

    i fyou need to contact me.

    however, I' m avai labl e via BB or cel l

    page 1

    PA - RD - 000001

  • 8/13/2019 Christie Documents Exhibit c

    4/33

    Please cal l me after 6am.txtfoye. txtFrom:Foye, Patr ickSent: Friday, September 13, 2013 6:02 AM

    To: Durando, RobertSubject: P lease cal l me af ter 6am

    Page 1

    fv.

    PA - RD - 000002

  • 8/13/2019 Christie Documents Exhibit c

    5/33

    Re Please cal l me after 6am.txtFrom: wildstein, DavidSent: Friday, September IB, 2013 7:01 am

    To: Durando, Robertsubject: Re: P lease cal l me af ter 6am

    His staff knows, but bb will to him

    - - - - - original Message - - - - -From: Durando, Robertsent: Friday, September 13, 2013 06:46 amt o : wildstein, Davidsubject: Re: please cal l me af ter 6am

    He asked about the test . He asked why he wasn t told.

    - - - - - original Message - - - - -From: wildstein , Davidsent: Friday, September 13, 2013 06:13 AM

    To: Durando, RobertSubject: Re: please cal l me af ter 6am

    L et' s me know what he says, thanks

    On Sep 13, 2013, at 6:04 AM, "Durando, Robert" wrote:

    > Fyi>> ---- Original M essage- - - - - -> From: Foye, P atrick> Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 06:01 am> To: Durando, Robert> Subject: P lease cal l me af ter 6am

    Page 1

    PA - RD - 000003

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/13/2019 Christie Documents Exhibit c

    6/33

    Fernandez. V anessaam&

    From: J acobs, DanielSent: Thursday, September 12,2013 5:14 PM

    To: Murieifo, Mark

    Subject: Emailing: Fort Lee Trial Review.pptAttachments: Fort Lee Trial Review.ppt

    The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments:

    Fort L ee Trial Review.ppt

    Note: To protect against computer viruses, e-mail programs may prevent sending or receiving certain types of

    -file-attachments, -Check your- e-mail-security-settings to determine-how attachments are handled- - - - - - -----

    i

    PA - RD- 000004

  • 8/13/2019 Christie Documents Exhibit c

    7/33

    1I

    /

    An EARLY assessment of the benefits of the trial

    September 12, 2013

    PA - RD - 000005

  • 8/13/2019 Christie Documents Exhibit c

    8/33

    Lee Tra ffic During the AM Peaki

    Lanes 20, 22, and 24 have been dedicated to local traffic duringthe AM peak using a cone line.

    PA - RD- 000006

  • 8/13/2019 Christie Documents Exhibit c

    9/33

    L ocal Traffic Throughput

    By eliminating two of the toll lanes dedicateefrom Ft Lee, this traffic was forced to queue

    1to local trafficon local streets:

    An analysis of traffic prior to implementation assumed thatunprocessed demand could reach over 600 vehicles

    - This analysis was based on the assumption that only traffic originating inFt. Lee would use the local ramp after trial implementation

    Two separate queues set up in Ft. Lee each stretch for over 0.5 miles(equivalent to over 260 vehicles)

    Queues were predicted to continue until aroundjnoon, which

    processing capacity of Lane #24 would catch upjto demand -1- This matches actual performance observed by GWB management

    Unfortunately, local E- ZPasstraffic lost its dedicated E- ZPass lane,requiring this traffic to join the CASH queues

    - On 9-4-13, local traffic had an E-ZPass market sflare of 46% during theAM peak period

    PA - RD- 000007

  • 8/13/2019 Christie Documents Exhibit c

    10/33

    Peak Travel Times - 9/12/2013

  • 8/13/2019 Christie Documents Exhibit c

    11/33

    Vehicle Hours of Delay

    The trial results in a trade-off between travel time savings for

    mainline traffic and substantial delays for local traffic: Assuming the 11,592 vehicles using the mainline toll lanes alter

    implementation of the trial each saved 5 minutes, the total savingswould be approximately 966 vehicle hours of reduced delay.

    Based on estimated Fort L ee queues of approximately 600 vehiclesover the course of four hours, local traffic is experiencing anadditional 2,800 vehicle hours of delay.

    - Even if queues are half those estimated, the additional delay would still far

    exceed the savings of mainline traffic.. .

    Based on estimated Fort L ee queues of approximately 550 vehicles at10 AM, many of these vehicles will pay the off- peak toll

    - At an E- ZPass market share of 46%, this works out: to a revenue loss of$550 per day or $137k per year.

    PA - RD- 000009

  • 8/13/2019 Christie Documents Exhibit c

    12/33

    Conclusions

  • 8/13/2019 Christie Documents Exhibit c

    13/33

    Abelians, Ana

    \From:Sent:

    To:Cc:

    Subject;

    Bates, J enniferWednesday, September 11,201311:40 AMDurando, RobertRjvera, J ose; Baig, Rizwan (Mifza); Ramirez, Enrique; Shabih, Raheel; Diculescu, Michael

    RB GWB Upper Level Tolf Plaza Modified - Travel Time Analysis

    Categories: Blue Category

    Bob,

    Thank you. Yes,' Traffic Engineering iscompiling the travel time mformatioii. The analysis for

    yesterday's operation (9/10/13) is ready and will be sent to you shortly. The analysis for this

    morning's operation (9/11/13) will be available tomorrow morning.

    J ennifer Bates, P.E.

    Senior EngineerTraffic Engii

    ibates@panvm .gov

    PA - RD- 000011

  • 8/13/2019 Christie Documents Exhibit c

    14/33

    / Abelians, Ana

    VFrom:Sent:

    To:Co:

    Subject:

    Rivera, J oseTuesday, September 10,2013 12:22 PMZlpf, PeterBuchsbaum, J ack; Starace, J im; Dicuiescu, Michael; Baig, Rizwan (Mlrza); Shablh, Raheel

    FW; GWB Upper Level Toil Plaza Modified

    Categories: Blue Category

    Peter,

    Traffic Engineering looked at the mainline travel time data from yesterday, but because of an incident on the

    C8X that resulted in traffic delays across the bridge, the travel times recorded ere not suitable to assess the

    impacts of the new traffic pattern. Since no Incident occurred during the morning peak period today, the

    comparison of todays travel times with the typical travel time on a Tuesday will be more indicative of traffic

    Impacts; We will perform that analysis and share it with the group tomorrow morning.

    Report from Bob Durando on Tuesday morning, 09/10/13 "test":

    From: Durando, RobertSent: Tuesday, September 10,2013 11:05 AMSubject: RE: GWB Fort Lee Approach - 9/10/13

    A little better than yesterday but still not good. 1-95 approaches were free and clear by 0330 and the Ft Lee

    ap proaches were packed. We addressed that by diverting Martha arid BRB traffic up to Center and directed that

    traffic into toll lanes 20 and 22, which they should have access to, had we given them the 3 lanes as per the

    agreement; This diversion is very labor intensive.

    GWB Fort Lee09-10-13, pdf

    J ose

    From: Rivera, J oseSent: Monday, September 09, 2013 2:37 PM

    To: Zipf, PeterCc: Buchsbaum, J ack; Starace, J im; Dicuiescu, Michael; Balg, Rizwan (Mlrza)Subject: RE: GWB Upper Level toll Plaza Modified

    My Traffic Operations staff has been in touch with the facility. Below Is an email from Bob Durando onthis mornfng's "test".

    Original Message-

    From: Durando, Robert

    Sent: M onday, September 09,201312:35 PM

    Subject: RE: GWB Fort Lee Approach

    i

    PA - RD- 000012

  • 8/13/2019 Christie Documents Exhibit c

    15/33

    East bound traffic broke at about 11:30 this morning, however, there was an incident on the

    CBX that contributed. We fielded 10 or so angry customers regarding there being only 1 toll

    lane available for Fort L ee and i had an unpleasant interaction with Fort L ee Police Chief and

    Asst Chief about congesting the Borough, and preventing the smooth flow of emergency

    response vehicles throughout the Borough. Their characterization was that the "test" was a

    monumental failure. Fort Lee is hot happy. Our PD spent an extended period worklngtheintersections and implemented diversions that further congested the borough. Traffic

    travelling north on Central were not permitted to make a left hand turn onto Bruce Reynolds

    Blvd. They were forced to make a right to Hudson Terrace and get on the end of the queue

    approaching from Martha Washington Way. (Diagram included showing this diversion, -jmr)I

    don' t know whether this will continue tomorrow. Mr. Wildsteln will be reaching out to me later

    to discuss, TBT 2 Mont staff are looking at numbers.

    GWFort LeeDlverstoapdf

    We are still working on travel time numbers on the mainline and will report back.

    J ose

    Original M essage

    From: Zipf, Peter

    Sent Friday, September 06, 2013 8:25 AM

    To: Rivera, J ose

    Cc: Baig, Rizwan (Mlrza); Biicbsbaum, J ack; Starace, J im

    Subject: RE: GWB Upper Level Toll Plaza Modified

    J ose,

    Great.

    I also just sent a note to Cedrlck on the sa me issue.

    Can you give me "daily summaries" ofTraffic impacts - both positive and negative.

    Thanks,

    Peter

    Original M essages

    From: Rivera, J ose

    Sent: Friday, September 06,2013 8:18 AM

    To: Zipf, Peter

    Cc: Baig, Rizwan (Mirza)

    Subject: RE: GWB Upper Level Toll Plaza Modified

    ( Peter,

    2

    PA - RD- 000013

  • 8/13/2019 Christie Documents Exhibit c

    16/33

    Working with TB&T should not be a problem. It has been a team effort (somewhat) for the orthotropic

    deck project.

    J ose

    From: Zipf, Peter

    Sent: Friday, September 06,2013 8:16 AM

    To: Rivera, J ose

    Subject: RE: GWB U pper Level Toll Plaza Modified

    Thanks - can you reach put to your counterparts in TBTto let them know, le, can it be a "team

    approach"?

    Is that reasonable and doable?

    let me know if 1need to call anyone.

    Thanks

    Original M essage--

    From: Rivera, J ose.

    Sent: Friday, September 06,2013 8:13 AM

    To: Zipf, Peter

    Cc: Baig, Rizwan (Mirza); Diculescu, Michael; Patel, Umang; Sbabih, Raheel

    Subject: RE: GWB Upper Level Toll PJ aza Modified

    Peter,

    I will look into whether we can monitor this similar to how we monitor theclosures for the orthotropicdeck project.

    J ose

    From: Zipf, Peter

    Sent: Friday, September 06,2013 8:10 AM

    To: Rivera, J ose

    Subject: RE: GWB Upper Level Toll Plaza Modified

    J ose,

    I was advise that on M onday TBT plans to implement the plan per sheet 4 {neck down to one lane).

    Is there any way that Traffic can be in touch with what ramifications come from this, -ie, I assume TBT

    will monitor traffic Impacts on Fort Lee as well as GWB flow through. Do they share that with your

    group or does your group get its own information?

    Thanks,

    Peter

    3

    PA - RD- 000014

  • 8/13/2019 Christie Documents Exhibit c

    17/33

    From: Zipf, Peter

    Sent: Thursday, August 29,2013 6:09 PM

    To: Rivera, J ose

    Subject: RE: GWB Upper Level Toll Plaza Modified

    Thanks J osei

    From: Rivera, J ose

    Sent: Thursday, August 29,201312:54 PM

    To: Zipf, Peter; Wiidstein, David

    Subject: RE: GWB Upper Level Toll Plaza Modified

    As discussed, attached is a revised PDF showing the GWB Upper Level Toll Plaza under four scenarios:

    Sheet 1; Shows a typical mid-day operation, where traffic cones are set aside and traffic is allowed

    to move freely from the various approaches.

    Sheet 2: Shows a mock up of the morning peak period, where the traffic cones are typically setup

    to segregate the three fanes from Fort Lee to flow into the three right- most lanes of the toll plaza.

    Sheet 3: Shows a mock up of a potential modified morning peak period where three lanes from

    Fort Lee are merged into two lanes arid feed the two right- most lanes of the toll plaza. Since the traffic

    flows are extremely congested during the morning peak periods. Traffic Engineering recommends that

    the Fort Lee traffic be segregated from the other approaches by use of traffic cones, regardless of the

    number of toil lanes it is feeding, to reduce the risk of sideswipe crashes.

    Sheet 4: Similar to above, however traffic from Fort Lee Is restricted to two lanes then merged into

    one lane to feed the right- most lane of the toil plaza, Also as above, since traffic flows are extremely

    congested during the morning peak periods, Traffic Engineering recommends that the Fort Lee traffic

    be segregated from the other approaches by use of traffic cones to reduce the risk of sideswipe

    crashes.

    GWB UL Tolls 6.pdf

    J ose

    From: Zipf, Peter

    Sent: Wednesday, August 28,2013 6:19 PM

    To: Wiidstein, David

    Cc: Rivera, J ose

    Peter

    4

    PA - RD- 000015

  • 8/13/2019 Christie Documents Exhibit c

    18/33

    Subject: GWB Upper Level Toll Plaza Modified

    David,

    As requested, attached is a suggested modification. J ose will certainly work out the details/ further

    development with GWB as needed. One additional scenario could be a merge down to one lane, If

    needed.

    Let me know ff you need anything further.

    Peter

    From: Rivera, J ose

    Sent; Wednesday, August 28,2013 6:11 PM

    To: Zipf, Peter

    Cc: Starace, J im; Buchsbaum, J ack; Baig, Rlzwan (Mfrza); Diculescu, Michael,

    Subject: GWB Upper Level Toll Plaza Modified

    Attached Is a PDF showing the GWB Upper Level Toll Plaza under three scenarios:

    Sheet 1: Shows a typical mid-d ayoperatlon, where traffic cones are set aside and traffic Is allowed

    to move freely from the various approaches,

    Sheet 2: Shows a mock up of the morning peak period, where the traffic cones are typically set up

    to segregate the three lanes from Fort Lee to flow into the three right- most lanes of the toil plaza.

    Sheet 3 : Shows a mock up of a potential modified morning peak period where three lanes from

    Fort Lee are merged into two lanes and feed the two right- most lanes of the toll plaza. Since the traffic

    flows are extremely congested during the morning peak periods. Traffic Engineering recommends that

    the Fort L ee traffic be segregated from the other approaches by use of traffic cones, regardless of the

    number of toll lanes it is feeding, to reduce the risk of sideswipe crashes.

  • 8/13/2019 Christie Documents Exhibit c

    19/33

    r

    P A - R D - d W f r l 7

  • 8/13/2019 Christie Documents Exhibit c

    20/33

    V.

    \II

    i

    PA- RD- 000018

  • 8/13/2019 Christie Documents Exhibit c

    21/33

    i

    v

    I

    ii

    i

    PA - RD -000019

  • 8/13/2019 Christie Documents Exhibit c

    22/33

    I

    \

    i

    PA - RD* 000020

  • 8/13/2019 Christie Documents Exhibit c

    23/33

    (\

    PA - RD - 000021

  • 8/13/2019 Christie Documents Exhibit c

    24/33

    \ C

    IS ;:f

    I l 1 |: / /w% ; H i i ! j ? //./

    ' : f ! v

    / .2 IjWM.FvIIIUGE - I: Si .L..U an / < ' 2!.,,^ii' I; - / r / ' x TO. W i ts I

    II i !i.3 i.-i ! ' i I />' . ' '( I ( / / '/ ' K \ -X-v,.

    v jH f i i U x ,1 & x "

    ' ] i j / I t / / ' -,f *

  • 8/13/2019 Christie Documents Exhibit c

    25/33

    Abelians, Ana

    Bates, J enniferWednesday, September 11,2013 11:4QAMDurando, RobertRivera, J ose; Balg, Rizwan (Mirza); Ramirez, Enrique; Shabih, Rabeel; Diculescu, Michael RE: GWB Upper Level Toil Plaza Modified - Travel Time Analysis

    Blue Category

    Bob,

    Thank you. Y es; Traffic Engineering is compiling the travel time infoimatioh. The analysis for

    yesterday's operation (9/10/13) is ready and will be sent to you shortly. The analysis for this

    morning's operation (9/11/13) will be available tomorrow morning.

    J ennifer Bates, P.E.

    Senior Engineer

    [email protected]

    From:sent:

    To:Cc;Subject:

    Categories:

    Original M essage---

    From; Durando, Robert . '

    Sent: Wednesday, September 11,2013 11:06 A M TcTf' Bates, J ennifer

    Cc: Rivera, J ose; Baig, Rizwan (Mirza); Ramirez, Enrique

    Subject: FW:

    Here's what I told GOCOR. this morning,. This operation has the potential to be very' expensive

    and labor intensive. Annualized toll collector costs for the additional coverage this operation

    requires is in the $600k range. There are also additional, as yet undetermined police costs, due

    to PAPD covering comers through the extended rush. It's my understanding that TED is pulling

    togethertravel time information....true?

    ---Original M essage-

    From: Lado, Tina

    Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 8:03 AM

    To: Durando, Robert

    Cc: Fulton, Cedrick

    Subject: Re:

    l

    PA - RD- 000023

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/13/2019 Christie Documents Exhibit c

    26/33

    So Same diversion as yesterday? A ny calls yet? I 've not received any yet ?

    Please excuse any typos; sent using BlaekBerry handheld device.

    -dado@Danvni. gov

    -- Original M essage---

    From: Durando, Robert

    Sent: Wednesday, September 11,2013 08:01 AM

    To: Lado, Tina

    Cc: Fulton, Cedrick

    Subject: RE:

    Good M orning Tina,

    S.ame as the last two days. The mainline on 1-95 is running very well. The borough continues

    to_be_congested, hut it, is 0800. Police are diverting traffic to provide alternate access to the

    --- Original M essage

    From: Lado* Tina

    ( Sent: Wednesday, September 11,2013 7:59 A M

    To: Durando, Robert

    Cc: Fulton, Cedrick

    Subject:

    Bob Hows it going this morning?

    Please excuse any lypos; sent using BlaekBerry handheld device.

    [email protected]

    2

    PA - RD- 000024

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/13/2019 Christie Documents Exhibit c

    27/33

    Abelians, Ana

    From: Rivera, J oseSent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 5:10 PM

    To: Zipf, PeterCo: Staraoe, J im; Buchsbaum, J ack; Baig, Rlzwan (Mirzs); Diculescu, Michael; Shablh, Raheel;

    Durando, RobertSubject: FW: GWB Upper Level Toll Plaza Modified

    Categories: Blue Category

    Peter,

    Traffic Engineering performed the analysis for Tuesday, September io, 2013 and did observe some

    Improvement In the overall travel time on the mainline during the morning peak period (6:00am to Noon). The

    attached file graphically represents the impact of the new traffic pattern on travel times on 1-95 local and

    express lanes to the GWB UL toll plaza. The summary of findings is as follows:

    - For traffic originating on 1-95 Express Lanes, an average reduction of 4.00 minutes in travel time was

    observed

    - For traffic originating on 1-95 Local Lanes, an average reduction of 2,76 minutes in travel time was

    observed.

    The Improvement In the travel time on the mainline should be weighed against the deterioration of level of

    service for the local traffic originating from Fort Lee. The facility and TB&T are assessing those impacts. We

    will coordinate with them and report back on the findings.

    GWB _UL-Toll

    lanes Reconflg

    Also, the daily report from the facility is as follows:

    Original Message-*From; Durando, RobertSent: Wednesday, September 11,2013 11:06 AMSubject: FW: GWB Fort Lee Approach - 9/11/13

    Heres what f told GOCOR this morning. This operation has the potential to be very expensive and labor

    Intensive. Annualized toll collector costs for the additional coverage this operation requires is In the $600k

    range. There are also additional, as yet undetermined police costs, due to PAPD covering comers through the

    extended rush, fts my understanding that TED(Traffic Engineering Division)is pulling together travel timeInfo rmation.. .,true? (Yes - as per this email,)

    J ose

    From: Rivera, J oseSent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 12:22 PM

    To: Zipf, Peterl

    PA - RD - 000025 '

  • 8/13/2019 Christie Documents Exhibit c

    28/33

    Cc: Buchsbaum, J ack; Starace, J im; Diculescu, Michael; Baig, Rizwan (Mirza); Shabih, RaheefSubject! FW: GWB Upper Level Toll Plaza Modified

    Peter,

    Traffic Engineering looked, at the mainline travel time data from yesterday, but because of an incident

    on the CBX that resulted in traffic delays.across the bridge, the travel times recorded are not suitableto assess the impacts of the newtraffic pattern. Since no incident occurred during the morning peak

    period today, the comparison of today's travel times with the typical travel time on a Tuesday will be

    more indicative of traffic Impacts. We will perform that analysis and share it with the group tomorrow

    morning.

    Report from Bob Durando on Tuesday morning, 09/10/13 "test":

    From: Durando, RobertSent: Tuesday, September 10,2013 11:05 AMSubject: RE: GWB Fort Lee Approach - 9/10/13

    A little better than yesterday but still not good. 1-95 approaches were free and clear by 0830 and the FtLee approaches were packed. We addressed that by diverting Martha arrd BRB traffic up to Center and

    directed that traffic into toll lanes 20 and 22, which they should have access to, had we given them the 3lanes as per the agreement. This diversion is very labor intensive.

    File: GWB Fort Lee 09-10- 13.pdf

    J ose

    From: Rivera, J oseSent: Monday, September 09,2013 2:37 PM _

    To: Zlpf, PeterCc: Buchsbaum, J ack; Starace, J im; Diculescu, Michael; Baig, Rizwan (Mirza)Subject: RE: GWB Upper Level Toll Plaza Modified

    Peter,

    My Traffic Operations staff has been in touch with the facility. Below Is an email from Bob Durando on

    this morning's "test.

    Original Message- - - -

    From: Durando, Robert

    Sent: Monday, September 09,201312:35 PM

    Subject: RE: GWB Fort L ee Approach

    East bound traffic broke at about 11:30 this morning, however, there was an Incident on the

    CBX that contributed. We fielded 10 or so angry customers regarding there being only 1 tolllane available for Fort Lee and I had an unpleasant interaction with Fort Lee Police Chief and

    Asst Chief about congesting the Borough, and preventing the smooth f low of emergency

    response vehicles throughout the Borough. Their characterization was that the "test" was a

    monumental failure. Fort Lee is not happy. Our PD spent an extended period working the

    intersections and implemented diversions that further congested the borough. Traffic

    . travell ing north on Central were not permitted to make a left hand turn onto Bruce Reynolds

    Blvd. They were forced to make a right to Hudson Terrace and get on the end of the queue

    2 .

    PA - RD- 000026

  • 8/13/2019 Christie Documents Exhibit c

    29/33

    approaching from Martha Washington Way. (Diagram included showing this diversion, -jmr)1

    dont know whether this will continue tomorrow. Mr. Wildstein will be reaching out to me later

    to discuss. TBT 2 Mont staff are looking at numbers.

    File: GWB Fort Lee Diversion.pdf

    We are still working on travel time numbers on the mainline and will report back.

    J ose

    Original M essage

    From: Zipf, Peter

    Sent: Friday, September 06,2013 8:25 AM

    to: Rivera, J ose

    Ce: Balg, Rizwan (Mirza); Buchsbaum, J ack; Starace, J im

    Subject RE: GWB Upper Level Toll Plaza Modified

    J ose,

    Great.

    I also just sent snote to Cedrick on the same issue.

    Can you give me "daily summaries" of Traffic impacts - both positive and negative.

    Thanks,

    Peter

    Original M essage

    From: Rivera, J oseSent: Friday, September 06,2013 8:18 AM

    To: Zipf, Peter

    Cc; Baig, Rizwan (Mirza)

    Subject: RE: GWB Upper Level Toll Plaza Modified

    Peter,

    Working with TB&T should not be a problem. It has been a team effort (somewhat) for the orthotropic

    deck project.

    J ose

    From: Zipf, Peter

    Sent: Friday, September06, 2013 8:16 AM

    To: Rivera, J ose

    Subject: RE: GWB Upper Level Toll Plaza Modified

    3

    PA - RD- 000027

  • 8/13/2019 Christie Documents Exhibit c

    30/33

    . . * r .

    Thanks - can you reach out to your counterparts in TBT to let them know, ie, can it be a "team

    approach"?

    Is that reasonable and doable?

    Let me know if I need to cal! anyone.

    Thanks

    Original M essage

    From: Rivera, J ose

    Sent: Friday, September 06,2013 8:13 AM

    To: Zipf, Peter

    Cc: Baig, Rizwan (Mirza); Diculescu, Michael; Patel, Umang; Shabih, Raheei

    Subject: RE: GWB Upper Level Toll Plaza Modified

    Peter,

    I will look into whether we can monitor this simila r to how we monitor the closures for the orthotropic

    deck project.

    J ose

    From: Zipf, Peter

    Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 8:10 AM

    To: Rivera, J ose

    Subject: RE: GWB Upper Level Toll Plaza Modified

    J ose,

    1was advise that on Monday TBT plans to Implement the plan per sheet 4 (neck down to one lane).

    Is there any way that Traffic can be in touch with what ramifications come from this, - ie, I assume TBT

    will monitor traffic impacts on Fort Lee as well as GWB flow through. Do they share that with your '

    group or does your group get its own information?

    Thanks,

    Peter

    From: Zipf, Peter

    Sent: Thursday, August 29,2013 6:0? PM

    To: Rivera, J oseSubject: RE: GWB Upper Level Toil Plaza Modified

    Thanks J ose!

    Peter

    PA - RD- 000028

  • 8/13/2019 Christie Documents Exhibit c

    31/33

    Prom: Rivera, J ose

    Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 12:54 PM

    To: Zipf, Peter; Wildstein, David

    Subject: RE: GWB Upper Level Toll Plaza Modified

    As discussed, attached Is a revised PDF showing the GWB Upper Level Toll Plaza under four scenarios:

    Sheet 1: Shows a typical mid-day operation, where traffic cones are set aside and traffic is allowed

    to move freely from the various approaches.

    Sheet 2: Shows a mock up of the morning peak period, where the traffic cones are typically set up

    to segregate the three lanes from Fort Lee to flow Into the three right- most lanes of the toll plaza. .

    Sheet 3:: Shows a mock up of a potential modified morning peak period where three lanes from

    Fort Lee are merged into two lanes and feed the two right- most lanes of the toll plaza. Since the traffic

    flows are extremely congested during the morning peak periods. Traffic Engineering recommends that

    the Fort Lee traffic be segregated from the other approaches by use of traffic cones, regardless Of then umber of toll lanes I f Is feeding, to reduce the risk of sideswipe crashes. *

    Sheet 4: Similar to above, howeyer traffic from Fort Lee is restricted to two lanes then merged into

    one lane to feed the right- most lane of the toll plaza. Also as above, since traffic flows are extremely

    congested during the morning peak periods. Traffic Engineering recommends that the Fort Lee traffic

    be segregated from the other approaches by use of traffic cones to reduce the risk of sideswipe

    crashes,

    File: GWB UL Tolls 6.pdf

    J ose

    From: Zipf, Peter

    Sent: Wednesday, August 28,2013 5:19 PM

    To: Wildstelh, David

    Gc: Rivera, J ose

    SubjecfcGWB Upper Level Toll Plaza Modified

    David,

    As requested, attached is a suggested modification. J ose will certainly work out the details/further

    development with GWB as needed. One additional scenario could be.a merge down to one lane, if

    needed.

    Let me know if you need anything further.

    Peter

    From: Rivera, J ose

    Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 6:11 PM

    5

    PA - RD - 000029

  • 8/13/2019 Christie Documents Exhibit c

    32/33

    To: Zipf, Peter

    Cc: Starace, J im; Buchsbaum, J ack; Baig, Rizwan (Mlrza); Diculescu, Michael

    Subject: GWB Upper Level Toll Plaza Modified

    Attached is a PDF showing the GWB Upper Level Toll Plaza under three scenarios:

    Sheet 1: Shows a typical mid-day operation, where traffic cones are set aside and traffic Is allowed

    to move freely from the various approaches.

    Sheet lx Shows a mock up of the morning peak period, where the traffic cones are typicaify set up

    to segregate the three lanes from Fort Lee to flow Into the three right- most lanes of the toll plaza.

    Sheet 3: Shows a mock up of a potential modified morning peak period where three lanes from

    Fort Lee are merged Into two lanes and feed the two right- most lanes.of the toll plaza. Since the traffic

    flows are extremely congested during the morning peak periods. Traffic Engineering recommends that

    the Fort Lee traffic be segregated from the other approaches by use of traffic cones, regardless of thenumber of toll lanes it is feeding, to reduce the risk of sideswipe crashes.

    File: GWB ULTolls 5a.pdf

    i hope this helps. Please advise if you need additional information.

    J ose M, Rivera, J r., P.E.

    Chief Traffic Engineer

    Port Authority of NY &NJ | Two Gateway Center, 14th Floor | Newark, NJ 07102 |

    | ......... ... m m [ www.panynj. gov

    s

    PA - RD- 000030

    http://www.panynj.gov/http://www.panynj.gov/
  • 8/13/2019 Christie Documents Exhibit c

    33/33