The work of Christian Peacemaking Lesson 2: Blessed Franz Jägerstätter.
CHRISTIAN PEACEMAKING IN THE GLOBAL CONTEXT · 2012-01-05 · Christian Peacemaking in the Global...
Transcript of CHRISTIAN PEACEMAKING IN THE GLOBAL CONTEXT · 2012-01-05 · Christian Peacemaking in the Global...
Boyd 1
CHRISTIAN PEACEMAKING IN THE GLOBAL CONTEXT
Jeff Boyd Independent Study November 3, 2010
Boyd 2
Christian Peacemaking in the Global Context
Introduction
Peacemaking is central to the biblical narrative. This is especially true regarding Jesus
Christ, whose life and teachings are normative for Christian disciples and communities. Jesus
blessed peacemakers (Matt. 5:9), and he is the giver of peace (John 14:27; Phil. 4:7).
Furthermore, Jesus came to set our feet in the way of peace (Luke 1:79), taught the importance
of reconciliation over commonly valued religious expressions (Matt. 5:23-24), and cried over
Jerusalem when it failed to learn the things that make for peace (Luke 19:41-44). Paul terms the
good news of the life, death and resurrection of Jesus with all of the surrounding implications as
the gospel of peace (Eph. 6:15). Relatedly, the ministry of reconciliation, which is stressed
throughout the book of Acts and the rest of the New Testament, had concrete expressions within
the community of faith as the walls between Jews and Gentiles, male and female, slave and free
were broken down (Acts 10; 2 Cor. 5:18; Gal. 3:28).
Clearly, this peacemaking has far reaching implications that expand well beyond both the
inner peace and the peace with God that many of us seek. These teachings and narratives
demonstrate that peace and reconciliation are God’s desires for all people living in our culturally
diverse world. Despite this peace theology, some have claimed that religion is a source for
conflict rather than a solution to it. Religious incompatibility and dissimilarity are seen as factors
driving conflict.1 In what Powers calls the secularist paradigm,2 religion is generally viewed as
“irrational and dysfunctional, a source of conflict and division, and a powerful motive force
behind exclusivist world views. Al Qaeda’s terrorism is exhibit A. Bosnia-Herzegovina, Kosovo, 1GerardF.Powers,“ReligionandPeacebuilding,”inStrategiesofPeace:TransformingConflictinaViolentWorld,ed.DanielPhilpottandGerardF.Powers(NewYork,NY:OxfordUniversityPress,2010),319.2Ibid.,317.
Boyd 3
Iraq, Lebanon, Israel-Palestine, Northern Ireland, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Sudan, Kashmir, and
Sri Lanka are also cited.”3
The instances of religiously tainted violence just cited raise a number of questions for
Christians today who desire to embody the biblical teachings presented above. Can religion,
specifically Christianity, truly be a force for peace? If so, how can Christians work for peace in
their communities and in the world? More specifically, what approaches to peacemaking are
appropriate for individuals, congregations, denominations, associations of churches, Christian
organizations, and believers employed by or volunteering in non-Christian organizations? For
Christians concerned about both faithfulness and effectiveness, what historical examples can be
used as models for reflection and training regarding the “things that make for peace”?
These questions are addressed in the three major sections of this paper. Part I describes a
six-part taxonomy or spectrum of peace-building activities. This section not only considers
various implementation modalities in each of the six categories, but also explores relevant
characteristics of each. Part II presents a number of peacemaking methodologies that have been
utilized by Christian actors in situations of conflict in various geographic locations. This section
will focus on column 4, Conflict Transformation, since this is the section most directly relevant
to peacemakers narrowly defined, as differentiated from actors traditionally associated with
categories to the left (e.g., international peacekeeping forces) and to the right (e.g., non-
governmental development agencies) of column 4. Finally, Part III brings the various actions or
methods of peacemaking together in a single case study that considers the Christian and inter-
faith actions that brought the warring parties to the table for peace talks in the African country of
Liberia.
3Ibid.,318.
Boyd 4
An additional question worth asking at the start of this consideration concerns the value
of addressing Christian peacemaking rather than focusing on basic, non-religious peacemaking.
Peace researchers and activists see, contrary to secular predictions, a “contemporary global
resurgence of religion.”4 This renewed focus on the role that religion plays in many
contemporary conflicts has highlighted the unique place that religious actors hold in
peacemaking. Four “attributes that give religious leaders and institutions sizeable influence in
peacemaking” include:
1. A well-established and pervasive influence in the community
2. A reputation as an apolitical force for change based on a respected set of values
3. Unique leverage for reconciling confliction parties, including an ability to rehumanize
relationships
4. The capability to mobilize community, national, and international support for a peace
process.5
Given this understanding of the power of religious leaders and the knowledge that
religion “can cause conflict or it can abate it,”6 Douglas Johnston calls for ways to be found that
“use religion as a positive force in resolving problems of communal identity that are proving
beyond the reach of traditional diplomacy, such as ethnic conflict, tribal warfare, and religious
hostilities.”7
Part I: Taxonomy of Approaches to Peacemaking
Christians have a bewildering array of peacemaking activities to choose from when
facing conflict. Little and Appleby describe this wide variety of actions that can be described as
4DouglasJohnstonandBrianCox,“Faith‐BasedDiplomacyandPreventiveEngagement,”inFaith‐BasedDiplomacy:TrumpingRealpolitik,ed.DouglasJohnston(NewYork,NY:OxfordUniversityPress,2003),11.5Ibid.,14.6Ibid.7Ibid.,15.
Boyd 5
religious peacebuilding as “the range of activities performed by religious actors and institutions
for the purpose of resolving and transforming deadly conflict, with the goal of building social
relations and political institutions characterized by an ethos of tolerance and nonviolence”
(emphasis theirs).8
Arranging the possible peacemaking activities as a taxonomy enables the Christian
peacemaker to more easily evaluate the various modalities (see Table 1).9
Table 1: Basic Peacemaking Taxonomy
PeacemakingTaxonomy&Nomenclature
ConfrontingConflict ResolvingConflict PreventingConflict
1.JustWar/Violence 2.JustPolicing 3.JudicialJustice4.Conflict
Transformation5.Community
Building6.Development
UnilateralForce MultilateralCooperation
Implem
entatio
n
3D Defense
(BroadlyDefinedasArmedIntervention)
Diplomacy(Judicial,Political,Structured&Nonviolent
Intervention)
Development(SocialandEconomicIntervention)
Little
Enforcement(non‐consensual)
Peacekeeping(consensual)
Agreement‐making Institution‐andCapacity‐building
Stassen
JustWarv.Pacifism JustPeacemaking
Prim
arySource
ofPow
er
PhysicalForce LegalForce RelationalForce
Focus
ProblemSolving CapacityBuilding
8DavidLittleandScottAppleby,“AMomentofOpportunity?ThePromiseofReligiousPeacebuildinginanEraofReligiousandEthnicConflict,”inReligionandPeacebuilding,ed.HaroldCowardandGordonS.Smith(Albany,NY:StateUniversityofNewYorkPress,2004),5.9AdamCurle'sconceptualizationoftheprogressionofconflictisalsoworthyofconsiderationfortheChristianpeacemaker.AlthoughStages1tothree(Education,Confrontation,andNegotiation)arerelevantforColumns3and4(JudicialJusticeandConflictTransformation),whileStageFour(SustainablePeace)correspondstoColumns5and6(CommunityBuildingandDevelopment).See:JohnPaulLederach,BuildingPeace:SustainableReconciliationinDividedSocieties(Washington,D.C.:UnitedStatesInstituteofPeacePress,1997),64‐66,orMáireA.Dugan,“ToNegotiateorNottoNegotiate:Thatisthe[False]Question,”BeyondIntractability,June2003,http://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/Peaceful_Chg_Strats/._June2003.
Boyd 6
Additionally, this taxonomy presents potential responses for Christian actors at eight
levels (see Table 2), an approach that builds on Lederach’s observation that different actors in a
conflict have different parts to play depending on their leadership level—grassroots, middle-
range and top.10
Each of the three broad response categories (i.e., Confronting Conflict, Resolving
Conflict and Preventing Conflict) in the taxonomy is further divided into two sub-categories—
Just War, Just Policing, Judicial Justice, Conflict Transformation, Community Building and
Development, respectively. These six sub-categories form the broad areas in which peacemaking
efforts can be grouped and represent a continuum of possible peacemaking initiatives.
I have not included David Steele’s four-part typology in my taxonomy because he
combines the resolution of current conflicts with the prevention of future conflicts, whereas for
my present purpose of demonstrating the different nature of various peacemaking efforts, I find it
useful to divide the actions into further divisions based on characteristics relating to force and
cooperation. While strategic peacemaking requires a link between Steele’s four divisions11—(1)
observation and witness, (2) education and formation, (3) advocacy and empowerment, and (4)
conciliation and mediation12—his categories lump activities in a way that make it difficult to
assess the qualities of each as my current taxonomy does. While strategic peace efforts need to
be supported by a broad range of peacemaking organizations and individuals, the particular
methods of engagement can be studied independently, as is made visually clear by my proposed
six-part taxonomy.
10Ibid.,38‐55.11Powers,“ReligionandPeacebuilding,”332.12DavidSteele,“AnIntroductoryOverviewtoFaith‐BasedPeacebuilding,”inPursuingJustPeace:AnOverviewandCaseStudiesforFaith‐BasedPeacebuilders,ed.MarkM.Rogers,TomBamat,andJulieIdeh(Baltimore,MD:CatholicReliefServices,2008),22‐33.
Boyd 7
After describing the six sub-categories listed above, we will then turn to Implementation
and expand it to include the eight leadership levels mentioned above.
Confronting Conflict
The first component of Confronting Conflict is Just War.13 These military actions are
advocated by those who believe that in certain circumstances violence is a necessary evil to end
injustice and to create an environment in which long-term peace can be established.14 World War
II is a classic example of this reasoning. It is argued that the violence of stopping Hitler was a
lesser evil than allowing the horrors of the Third Reich to continue. Alternatively, pacifist
theologians and activists question this logic. For example, Walter Wink has written extensively
on the “myth of redemptive violence.”15
While justifiable war in its standard philosophical and theological configuration can only
be initiated by a legitimate authority,16 generally the political head of state, in this taxonomy the
label Just War can be applied to any action where an organized group advocates violence as the
legitimate means for correcting an injustice or preparing the way for future peace. This broad
definition goes well beyond the standard criteria for determining justifiable war, the factors
concerning jus ad bellum and jus in bello.17
13JohnHowardYoderhasarguedthatamoreprecisetermforthiscategoryis“JustifiableWar”;however,forsakeofbrevity,Iamusingtheshorterwording.See:JohnHowardYoder,ChristianAttitudestoWar,Peace,andRevolution,ed.TheodoreJ.KoontzandAndyAlexis‐Baker(GrandRapids,MI:BrazosPress,2009),83‐84.14MichaelWalzer,JustandUnjustWars:AMoralArgumentwithHistoricalIllustrations,3rded.(NewYork,NY:BasicBooks,1977).15WalterWink,EngagingthePowers:DiscernmentandResistanceinaWorldofDomination(Minneapolis,MN:FortressPress,1992),13‐31.16Yoder,ChristianAttitudestoWar,Peace,andRevolution,95‐97.17Yoder,ChristianAttitudestoWar,Peace,andRevolution,88‐104;RolandH.Bainton,ChristianAttitudestowardWarandPeace:AHistoricalSurveyandCriticalRe‐evaluation(Nashville,TN:AbingdonPress,1960),95‐100.
Boyd 8
Next, Just Policing refers to non-military law enforcement. This has been most actively
advanced by Gerald Schlabach.18 While more peacemakers accept Just Policing than the theory
of Just War, some pacifists such as Andy Alexis-Baker have argued that this level of coercive
force is still beyond the scope of proper Christian peacemaking.19
Resolving Conflict
The second broad category—Resolving Conflict—moves the peacemaking focus to
mutually agreed upon structures for resolving conflicts. First, Judicial Justice consists of the
various legal, statutory and judicial bodies and processes designed for civil society to use when
resolving disagreements and conflicts. The court system plays a significant role in this category
in regards to both criminal and civil law, where legal adversaries present evidence to a neutral
third party, often a judge or jury, who determine the proper resolution of a presenting problem
based on current law and the facts of the case.
Conflict Transformation, the partner column to Judicial Justice, goes beyond mere
dispute resolution by including relational dynamics that can be addressed in mediation and
similar processes. Rather than settle for the win-lose orientation of Judicial Justice, Conflict
Transformation operates with a win-win paradigm by attempting to find mutually agreeable
solutions that build trusting relationships.20 Social transformation is possible at this level because
structures and systems can be addressed from a standpoint of mutual concern for what is best for
society today and in the future.
18GeraldSchlabach,ed.,JustPolicing,NotWar:AnAlternativeResponsetoWorldViolence(Collegeville,MN:LiturgicalPress,2007).19AndyAlexis‐Baker,“JustPolicing:ANewFacetoanOldChallenge,”inPeaceBeWithYou:Christ'sBenedictionAmidViolentEmpires,ed.SharonL.BakerandMichaelHardin(Telford,PA:CascadiaPublishing,2010),80‐99.20Lederach,BuildingPeace:SustainableReconciliationinDividedSocieties;JohnPaulLederach,TheLittleBookofConflictTransformation(Intercourse,PA:GoodBooks,2003).
Boyd 9
Preventing Conflict
The third section—Conflict Prevention—is forward focused. Community Building
focuses on the relationships as well as the short-term infrastructure needs of the community.
Issues of concern may include inter-religious dialogue, race relations, or the polarizing effects of
partisan politics. Finally, Development is the broad category for deep and lasting change in
society. This includes such diverse elements as improving the education system, providing safe
drinking water, reducing crime, and building sufficient affordable housing. John Paul Lederach
makes the case for including these development type projects in the peace conversation. Peace
includes
the elimination of deadly violence and the development of local and national
communities that respect the dignity of each individual and promote authentic
human flourishing. These conditions include the absence of war and other forms
of deadly violence, such as violations of human dignity by state or nonstate
actors (i.e., negative peace) and extends to basic human security, access to food
and clean drinking water, housing, justly compensated employment, education
and other expressions of positive peace.21
Characteristics of the Six Categories
Beneath the Implementation row, four additional rows of characteristics describe the
nature of the six peacemaking categories. These descriptive rows are tools for analyzing the
nature of the six categories, which present a spectrum ranging from unilateral use of force on the
left (Just War) to non-coercive multilateral cooperation on the right (Development).
21JohnPaulLederachandR.ScottAppleby,“StrategicPeacebuilding:AnOverview,”inStrategiesofPeace:TransformingConflictinaViolentWorld,ed.DanielPhilpottandGerardF.Powers(NewYork,NY:OxfordUniversityPress,2010),41‐42.
Boyd 10
These rows demonstrate how the taxonomy can be in conversation with other major
peace-building theories—Glen Stassen’s work on just peacemaking,22 David Little’s four types
of peacemaking,23 and Lisa Schirch’s 3D Initiative24—as well as other questions such as sources
of power (Physical, Legal or Relational) and overall focus (Problem Solving or Capacity
Building).
Further, these five descriptive rows show that each of the six columns have overlapping
qualities25 that can be described and analyzed from different perspectives. This taxonomy
therefore not only allows peace practitioners to think clearly about their response options, it also
enables ethicists and theologians to clarify relevant moral questions regarding each of the six
response categories. For example, including Just War in a peacemaking taxonomy is anathema to
pacifist practitioners, a tension which is highlighted in the row focusing on Stassen’s paradigm.
Furthermore, it is seen that even Just Policing is a contested concept.
Implementation and Types of Actors
Table 2 includes the same six categories, but it expands the Implementation row by
dividing it into eight levels of responders based on the logic of Lederach’s types of actors.
Because the focus of the remainder of this paper will be on implementation, the descriptive rows
presented in Table 1 are now excluded. Brief examples are given in most of the intersections
between columns and rows in an effort to make the table more readily understandable, though
these diverse examples are by no means exhaustive.
22GlenH.Stassen,ed.,JustPeacemaking:TheNewParadigmfortheEthicsofPeaceandWar,2nded.(Cleveland,OH:PilgrimPress,2008).23DavidLittle,ed.,PeacemakersinAction:ProfilesofReligioninConflictResolution(Cambridge,UK:CambridgeUniversityPress,2007),442‐447.24http://www.3dsecurity.org/25ThisoverlappingrealityisdemonstratedvisuallyinthelowerfourrowsofTable1withacombinationofsolidverticallines,dashedlines,anddeletedlinesthatmergeblocksacrosspeacemakingcategories.
Boyd 11
Table 2: Implementation Methodologies for Seven Levels of Peace Actors PeacemakingTaxonomy
ConfrontingConflict ResolvingConflict PreventingConflict
JustWar/Violence JustPolicing JudicialJusticeConflict
TransformationCommunityBuilding Development
Individu
al ‐Enlistinmilitary ‐Joinpoliceforce ‐Filelegalsuit ‐Engagein
Mediation‐Repentance&forgiveness‐Nonviolentaction
‐Supportadvocacymovements
‐Volunteerwithadevelopmentagency
Congregatio
ns ‐Supportlocal
militarypersonnel ‐Offermoral
educationrelatingtonationalpolicy(legalandpoliticalelements)
‐Resolveintra‐congregationalconflicts
‐Developculturesofpeace‐Buildbridgesacrossculturalandreligiousboundaries
‐Mobilizelocalvolunteers
Den
ominations ‐Expresssupport
formilitarypersonnel‐Encouragecongregationstosupport
‐Issuehumanrightsstatements‐Encouragechurch‐baseddiscussionofnationalissues‐Advocateforjustnationalpolicies
‐Supportcongregationsintraining‐Resolveintra‐andinter‐denominationalconflicts.
‐EncourageGrassroots/voluntarygroups‐Mobilizemembers‐Dialoguewithotherdenominations&religions
‐Supportdenominationalaidorgs‐Mobilizemembers
ChristianAssoc.
(NCC
,WCC
)
‐Encouragedenominationstosupportmilitaryintervention
‐Issuehumanrightsstatements‐Advocateforjustnationalpolicies
‐Supportrepentance&reconciliationefforts‐Encouragedenominationstopursuepeace‐Plannonviolentdirectactions
‐Encourageinterfaithdialogue‐Advocatefornationalpolicies(domestic&foreign)thatsupportpeace&justice
‐Supportcivilsociety
ChristianNGOs
(MCC
,CPT
)
‐Advocateforjustnational&localpolicies
‐Arbitration‐Mediation‐VORP‐PrayerConferences
‐Implementschoolandcommunity‐basededucationprograms
‐Supportcivilsociety‐Education‐Healthcare‐Business‐Food&water
Non
‐Christia
nNGOs
(Oxfam
,Nairobi
PeaceInitiative) ‐Support
DemocraticEfforts‐Arbitration‐Mediation
‐Collaboratewithgrassroots/voluntarygroups‐Runprograms/projectsatcommunitylevel
‐Supportcivilsociety‐Education‐Healthcare‐Business‐Food&water
Governm
ents ‐Engageinmilitary
operations‐PoliceIntervention‐Enactdemocratic
reforms‐TruthCommissions
‐Truthcommissions
‐Developgovernmentprocesses‐Enactweaponsreduction(MIC)
Implem
entatio
n
Inter‐gov.Orgs
(UN,W
TO,ICC
) ‐UNPeacekeeping
‐Internationalcourts,treaties&structures‐UNdeclarations
‐Collaboratewithandsupportgrassroots/voluntarygroups
‐Education‐Healthcare‐Business‐Food&water
Boyd 12
Rather than limit this taxonomy to Lederach’s three levels—grassroots, middle-range and
top leadership—I have expanded it to eight levels. I believe the definitions of Individuals,
Congregations and Denominations are readily understood, so I will not describe them in further
detail. “Christian Associations” include groups such as the National Council of Churches (NCC),
the National Association of Evangelicals (NEA), the African Evangelistic Enterprise (AEE), and
the World Council of Churches (WCC).
The row titled “Christian NGOs” addresses nongovernmental agencies dedicated to
peacemaking or other forms of humanitarian work within a Christian paradigm. This includes
Christian Peacemaker Teams (CPT), Peacemaker Ministries, Mennonite Central Committee
(MCC), and many others. “Non-Christian NGOs” includes entities like the Nairobi Peace
Initiative and the Center for Community Justice. I have divided NGOs into these categories
because Christian organizations have a set of religiously informed tools such as prayer
conferences that would not be employed by non-religious NGOs or would be approached in a
very different way by humanitarian agencies organized around other faith traditions.
The next row, “Governments,” include local, regional and national state actors. Finally,
“Inter-governmental Agencies” includes international bodies such as the United Nations, the
World Trade Organization, the International Criminal Court, and the African Union. These eight
types of actors represent the full range of organizations that a Christian may choose to partner
with or work for when promoting peace in society.
The taxonomy laid out in Table 2 provides a framework that Christians can use to aid in
selecting appropriate and ethical peacemaking initiatives. However, the neatly arranged columns
and rows necessarily oversimplify the complexity of peacemaking efforts. That is,
methodologies cannot always be reduced to one discrete box; they can easily move along both
Boyd 13
the vertical and horizontal axes. As an example, I have listed Truth Commissions in both Judicial
Justice and Conflict Transformation since they can be arranged in very different ways with very
different intentions. Reflecting on his six-part typology of peacemaking efforts in Northern
Ireland, John Brewer comes to the same conclusion. “The kinds of activities engaged in by
organizations, groups, and individuals can fall into several categories of peacemaking and can
overlap.”26 While helpful for analyzing case studies, taxonomies and models by nature over-
simplify the available data.
The manner in which John Paul Lederach differentiates between conflict resolution and
conflict management further demonstrate the connection between the various divisions of my
taxonomy, in this case blurring the line between the end of Conflict Transformation and the
beginning of Community Development.
A conflict resolution standpoint is clear about what needs to be stopped—
violence, for example….Conflict transformation, on the other hand, focuses on
change, addressing two questions: “What do we need to stop?” and “What do we
hope to build?” Since change always involves a movement from one thing to
another, peacebuilders must look not only at the starting point, but also at the goal
and the process….While conflict resolution focuses on de-escalation of conflict
and diffusion of crises, transformation…sees the presenting problem as a potential
opportunity to transform the relationship and the systems in which relationships
are embedded.27
26JohnD.Brewer,“NorthernIreland:PeacemakingamongProtestantsandCatholics,”inArtisansofPeace:GrassrootsPeacemakingamongChristianCommunities,ed.MaryAnnCejkaandThomasBamat(Maryknoll,NY:Orbis,2003),83.27JohnPaulLederach,ReinaNeufeldt,andHalCulbertson,ReflectivePeacebuilding:APlanning,Monitoring,andLearningToolkit(NotreDame,IN:TheJoanB.KrocInstituteforInternationalPeaceStudies,UniversityofNotreDameandCatholicReliefServicesSoutheast,EastAsiaRegionalOffice,2007),17.
Boyd 14
Because this peacemaking matrix is too expansive for one paper to address in any
significant depth, I have chosen to limit the peacemaking methodologies presented in Part II to
the three sections highlighted above in orange (See Table 2). My focus is on the practices that
Christian Associations, Christian Organizations, and Christians in secular Nongovernmental
Organizations can use when approaching Conflict Transformation. Although example narratives
will include elements of other categories, the consideration will generally exclude
congregational, denominational, and governmental actors as well as organizations focused on
community development (Column 5) so that a spotlight can be shown on the efforts of Christian
organizations working in conflict zones for the cessation of violence and the building of
sufficient stability required to engage in actions that build positive peace.
Part II: Peacemaking Methodologies
Christian peacemaking draws on a broad range of practices. While not exhaustive, the
following description of practices is intended to present an accounting of peace methodologies
used by Christians in violent conflicts around the world. Because the characteristics of a given
methodology make it more or less effective depending on situational factors, peacemakers
should be aware of the menu of options available to them. Furthermore, types of responses
should not be considered in isolation, but should be combined for increased spiritual and social
impact. For example, prayer initiatives and mediation should be seen as complimentary actions,
not competing methodologies where one must be utilized at the expense of the other.
Two more clarifications will set the stage for the following peacemaking examples.
Firstly, I have focused this analysis on efforts and techniques for ending violent conflicts. This
means that I have not included nonviolent actions aimed at promoting social justice and broad
human rights that would fall in the fifth section of the taxonomy—Community Building (e.g.,
land reform, living wage, freedom to vote, etc.). While the actions listed here may prove useful
Boyd 15
in these larger issues, the examples I have chosen are limited to ending violence, promoting
peaceful conflict resolution, and engendering reconciliation. Secondly, I have chosen to look for
“low profile” examples. To this end I have not included stories from the much publicized
nonviolent movements and actions in Poland (Solidarity), South African (Apartheid), Philippines
(Marcos-Aquino), the United States (Civil Rights), or Eastern Europe (End of the Soviet Union).
Prayer Initiatives
In addition to the well-known development activities of World Vision such as child
sponsorship and food provision, the organization also sponsors prayer initiatives around the
world. Prayer conferences have been held in conjunction with local congregations and
international prayer teams in some of the bloodiest conflict zones the world has seen—
Cambodia, Rwanda, Bosnia, and Kosovo.28 Prayer warriors John Robb and James Hill, both with
ties to World Vision, assert, “This kind of praying does not preclude normal human attempts to
resolve conflict, such as diplomacy, conflict mediation, and even the use of military force, but
rather it helps them to be effective.”29 This reference to military intervention demonstrates that
prayer is valued by pacifist and non-pacifist peacemakers alike.
Robb and Hill share moving stories from their prayer conferences, highlighting a number
of lessons that are applicable in a broad range of settings.30 First, prayer makes a difference in
the physical world where our conflicts are manifested. In each of the four countries listed above,
changes at the grassroots and national level were seen in the weeks and months following the
international and interdenominational prayer conferences. For example, after Cambodia
Christian Services and World Vision co-sponsored a prayer initiative in March 1995, “the Khmer
28JohnD.RobbandJamesA.Hill,ThePeacemakingPowerofPrayer:EquippingChristianstoTransformtheWorld(Nashville,TN:BroadmanandHolmanPublishers,2000).29Ibid.,3‐4.30Inadditiontotheguidelinesandobservationspresentedhere,seeRobbandHill’slistof18lessonsinThePeacemakingPowerofPrayer,115‐120.
Boyd 16
Rouge continued to dissolve as an effective political and military force to the point of extinction.
One month later, the government reported that they had been reduced to a mere nuisance.”31 This
reinforces a point Robb makes when quoting Walter Wink, “History belongs to the
intercessors.”32
Second, Robb and Hill stress “the importance of loving, bold confrontation of sin and the
need for reconciliation.”33 Two stories illustrate this point. At a prayer meeting in Bosnia, the
focus was on reconciliation between the three warring factions—Serbs, Bosnians, and Croats.
Attendees from each ethnicity, including soldiers and people who had lost family members,
confessed their anger toward the others and asked for forgiveness in order to be reconciled. After
a period of group confession, each person was asked “to go to another from a different ethnic
group and personally ask them for forgiveness. For some, this was a most difficult task.
However…we all began to move around the room confessing, asking for forgiveness, and
extending forgiveness. We hugged and wept together, asking the Lord to heal.”34 As seen in this
story, Evangelical Christians are able to serve “as interlocutors and facilitators…because
evangelicals are the only nonnational religious group; they have believers from all groups.”35
Confronting sin as a means of enabling reconciliation was also critical to the success of
the international prayer conference in Cambodia. On the second day, the conference leader went
to the front and declared, “Some of you have blood on your hands!”36 After a period of silence,
the spiritual and emotional dam broke and opened the way for
31RobbandHill,ThePeacemakingPowerofPrayer:EquippingChristianstoTransformtheWorld,165.32Ibid.,48.33Ibid.,116.34Ibid.,60.35Ibid.,110.36Ibid.,159.
Boyd 17
weeping, wailing, and torrents of tears. One by one, pastors and evangelists
confessed that during the ‘killing fields’ time, they themselves had killed others
with their own hands. At that time they had not yet come to Christ and since then
had been keeping their crimes secret for fear of retaliation upon themselves and
their families. However, suppressing the truth had taken its toll, hindering the
unity of the church and making them distrustful of one another.37
After this time of confessing crimes like burying babies alive and murdering hundreds of
innocent people, the group “felt emboldened to pray aggressively for the healing and deliverance
of the land idolatry and the dominion of darkness.” With this renewed energy, they broke into
teams and continue their prayer efforts in various areas around the capital.
A third lesson presented by Robb and Hill relates to connectivity. International prayer
conferences should be connected to international supporting intercessors outside of the country
and to church and parachurch leaders in the local setting. In each of the stories presented, prayer
networks (e.g., World Vision email list or the European Prayer Link) were used to request
intercession from Christians around the world, while the prayer team followed the leadership of
church leaders while in the areas of conflict.
Robb and Hill’s international prayer experience demonstrates that prayers for peace,
forgiveness, reconciliation, justice, healing, courage, and the growth of God’s good kingdom
should be the first tool of choice for Christian peacemakers. By seeking God first, we invite
God’s power to transform the “enemy,” and we are better prepared to employ the other
peacemaking tools at our disposal.
37Ibid.
Boyd 18
Of course, prayer initiatives can take many forms. For example, Friends (Quaker) women
in Kenya formed prayer groups of women across the country in the early 1990s.38 Because the
Friends yearly meetings had splintered because of conflicts in the 40s, these women began
attending the yearly meetings of the various groups. The pastor of these groups, Nora Musundi,
shares that these factions are now “united under the umbrella of the Friends Council of Kenya. In
2001, all the yearly meetings held a reconciliation meeting in which the people were willing to
forgive one another and to commit to work together in harmony.”39
These Kenyan women also pray for concerns outside of the church. They also pray for
national unity, for peace elections, and for strength to carry out a range of humanitarian
activities, including caring for orphans and those affected by HIV/AIDS, providing job training
to school dropouts, and educating young people. “The strength behind our work is always
prayer.”40
Fasting
Like most of the actions listed in this section, fasting is a spiritual and social activity that
has been used by both Christian and non-Christian peacemakers. Gandhi is quite likely the most
famous non-Christian used fasted often and at great lengths in his peace- and justice-making
efforts.41 Fasting is a powerful tool for personal and social change, and has been used effectively
in tandem with other modes of peacemaking.
38NoraMusundi,“CaringforVictimsinKenya,”inSeekingPeaceinAfrica:StoriesfromAfricanPeacemakers,ed.DonaldE.Milleretal.(Telford,PA:CascadiaPublishing,2007),143.39Ibid.,146.40Ibid.41LouisFischer,ed.,TheEssentialGandhi:AnAnthologyofHisWritingsonHisLife,Work,andIdeas,Second.(NewYork,NY:Vintage,2002),241.
Boyd 19
In 1997 the Christian Peacemaker Team in Hebron decided to fast as a response to the
destruction of Palestinian homes by the Israeli military.42 “We made the decision to fast for
seven hundred hours—one hour for each of the looming demolitions. We began…with three
members doing a liquid-only fast and the others, a Ramadan-style fast that consisted of eating
only between sundown and sunrise.”43
To improve the effectiveness of the fast at raising awareness of the demolitions, the team
set up a tent in a visible area and networked with other groups in the area—“Sabeel (a
Palestinian Christian Liberation Theology organization in Jerusalem), Rabbis for Human Rights,
Israelis and Palestinians for Nonviolence, and a United Methodist group in Jericho.”44 A journal
was also used for Palestinians who visited the tent to record their stories, accounts that were then
translated into English for activists and the press. Palestinian women used the tent as a place to
make speeches at the end of a march designed to draw attention to the demolitions.
Determining the success of the fast depends on ones perspective. Some homes were
temporarily spared, new connections were made, awareness was raised, and three Israeli activists
who had supported the fast started a new organization, Israeli Committee Against Home
Demolitions (ICAHD).45 And yet years later, “the demolitions continue. The Israeli army
continues to uproot families. The human face that we helped the world to see is still streaked
with tears.”46 However, the final chapter is not written yet. CPT activist Art Gish reminds us,
42DianneRoe,“WitnessingDemolition,FastingforRebuilding,”inGettingintheWay:StoriesfromChristianPeacemakerTeams,ed.TriciaGatesBrown(Scottdale,PA:HeraldPress,2005),82.43Ibid.,83.44Ibid.45Ibid.,86.46Ibid.,87.
Boyd 20
“We just have to do what’s right. We never, never can predict the consequences of our
actions.”47
Three years later, another CPT delegation fasted in Chiapas, Mexico, in support of
indigenous communities who had been forced to leave their homes and villages because of
paramilitary violence. In conjunction with the displaced Abejas, “an indigenous, pacifist,
Christian group that refused to take sides in the conflict between the Mexican state and the
Zapatista rebels,”48 CPT decided to fast and pray throughout the duration of Lent. Like the team
in Hebron, this group set up a tent; however, the location was quite provocative—the middle of a
Mexican army base that had been established near the indigenous refugee camp.
Surprised that the military did not intervene, a rotation of CPT members and Abejas
continued to fast and pray in the shelter. At night up to twelve people would squeeze into the tent
to sleep in solidarity. This continued until Holy Week when the Abejas planned community
action and worship. Mexican university students and others from abroad joined these actions—a
procession following the Virgin of the Massacre, public scripture readings, writing “PAZ”
(peace) on the helipad, singing songs and raising peace flags.49
Similar to the fast in Hebron, the full impact of the fast is difficult to assess. After the
fast, at least two soldiers left the Mexican army, and eventually the Abejas were able to return to
their villages even as the Zapatistas felt the need to remain in their refugee camps. Looking back
on the fast, William Payne concludes that “we are called to act in truth and to trust that God is
directing the results even when we cannot see them.”50
47LeahyMatthew,OldRadicals,Online,Documentary,2010,http://www.docchallenge.org/2010‐Finalists/old‐radicals.html.48WilliamPayne,“PeopleofFaithOccupyaMilitaryBase,”inGettingintheWay:StoriesfromChristianPeacemakerTeams,ed.TriciaGatesBrown(Scottdale,PA:HeraldPress,2005),114.49Ibid.,121‐122.50Ibid.,123.
Boyd 21
Prayer and fasting have also been promoted by the Catholic Church in other areas. For
example, in Sri Lanka daily prayer and fasting was introduced during Lent in 2000 and by the
next year the practice had spread throughout the Diocese. 51
Zones of Peace
José Inocencio Alas, also known as “Chencho,” was active in community organizing in
El Salvador when he was a Catholic priest. Although he has now left the priesthood, he continues
to work for peace and justice as a Catholic layperson. Among his many peacemaking initiatives
is the “Zone of Peace,” which he has promoted through Coordinadora del Bajo Lempa, a
community-based organization. Alas describes the violence prevalent in Salvadoran society after
the end of the sixty-year civil war—rampant street crime, kidnappings, killings, torture,
robberies, and more recently, gangs.52
In response, Coordinadora held dozens of workshops that focused on building a shared
vision for a Local Zone of Peace, “a region committed to changing the culture of violence to one
of collaboration, mutual problem solving, and peace.”53 On the first day of the workshops,
participants described the violence experienced in their local communities. This was followed
with reflections on biblical material such as Cain and Abel or the Sermon on the Mount. The
second day used more Bible teachings to develop a vision of peace. After nearly two years of
such preparation, a multi-national parade of peace inaugurated the Zone of Peace.54
The vision of peace that the region developed is holistic and “includes the full range of
issues that need to be addressed to reach true peace, and not merely the absence of war.” This
51ShirleyLalWijesinghe,“SriLanka:PropheticInitiativesamidstDeadlyConflict,”inArtisansofPeace:GrassrootsPeacemakingamongChristianCommunities,ed.MaryAnnCejkaandThomasBamat(Maryknoll,NY:Orbis,2003),175.52Little,PeacemakersinAction:ProfilesofReligioninConflictResolution,45.53Ibid.54Ibid.,46.
Boyd 22
demonstrates the connection between columns 4 and 5 (Conflict Transformation and Community
Building) in the taxonomy presented above. While they can be considered as discreet types of
peacemaking, both work together well in real-world applications.
Alas continues to support the Zone of Peace through fundraising via the Foundation for
Self-Sufficiency in Central America (FSSCA). These peacemaking efforts have spread, and Alas
is now working on the Mesoamerican Peace Project that looks to expand peace throughout the
region by developing “a peaceful response to globalization from the bottom up.”55
Half-way around the globe, Rev. Dr. Benny Giay has worked in West Papua, Indonesia,
much as Alas has in El Salvador.56 As an indigenous human rights worker, activist, and church
leader, Giay has seen education, community organizing, and peacemaking as central to the
mission of the church. Even though he has been critical of the evangelical Christian community’s
over emphasis on one’s relationship with God to the neglect of promoting harmony in society
and with creation, Giay cites a 1992 report by the Evangelical Church of West Papua
documenting the Indonesian government’s record of tortures and killings as being pivotal in
making human rights work an important part of his ministry.57
Also similarly to Alas, Giay has been involved with efforts aimed at building a zone of
peace. In response to conflict between Papuans and the government as well as between ethnic
Papuans and Indonesian migrants, the Provincial Parliament of Papua established the zone in
West Papua in 2002 and created the Papua Peace Commission to put it into practice. Giay was
named the director and was given the task of building “a coalition of all segments of the Papuan
community (including non-governmental, religious, women’s, and student organizations) in
55Ibid.,48.56Ibid.,402‐422.57Ibid.,409.
Boyd 23
support of” the peace zone.58 Although progress has been slow, arguably because of military
interventions and outsiders who come and provoke intertribal conflict, Giay continues to educate
and build bridges in hopes that the future will be marked by peace and justice rather than the
violence of the past. This perseverance is at last partially understood given his faith as expressed
in his first principle of peacemaking: “Christ came to establish a ‘shalom society,’ and Christians
are called to be part of this mission.”59
Accompaniment
Accompaniment is the partnering of international peacemakers with local, threatened
people and communities with the goal of preventing localized violence within a larger context of
conflict. The technique’s effectiveness results from the increased additional media exposure of
local abuses. In the short film, Old Radical, Art Gish calls the peacemaking effect of the
presence of him and his wife (both of whom are well passed retirement age) the grandmother
effect. He explains, “There are things that nobody would do if their grandmother were watching.
There are things that soldiers will not do if they know they’re being watched. So in a situation of
violence and tension, if the people on both sides know they’re being watched, they know that
whatever they do is going to be reported to the rest of the world, just that in itself will tend to
reduce the violence.”60
This is the primary intervention used by Christian Peacemaker Teams (CPT), though they
also combine other actions. Teams “choose to live in conflict zones to create space for local
efforts of nonviolent resistance. They talk to soldiers, guerrillas, and paramilitaries; they
58Ibid.,416.59Ibid.,420.60Matthew,OldRadicals.
Boyd 24
accompany school children and farmers; they advocate for human rights, support local initiatives
in nonviolence, and disseminate reports of what they witness.”61
A CPT experience in Hebron illustrates the violence-diminishing effects of
accompaniment. In early January 1999, the Palestinian Authority in Hebron planned a nonviolent
protest of the curfew that applied to Palestinians but not to Israelis. Because the revered Ibrahimi
Mosque is located in the Israeli-controlled section of the city (H2) where the curfew is enforced,
Palestinians are not able to worship there. Consequently, the demonstrators planned to march
from the Palestinian section (H1) into the disputed area (H2).62 CPT members did not participate
in the march, but they were invited to be on hand as a deterrent against violence, knowing that a
public demonstration of this nature could be highly volatile.
CPTer Mark Frey recounts that as the group approached the H2 border:
a squad of soldiers charges down the alley, garbed in full riot gear….They move
into firing positions. Pierre, Sara, and at least one Palestinian man leap in front of
the leveled M-16s, screaming “Don’t shoot! This is nonviolent! They’re not
throwing stones!” They’re trying to use their whole bodies to stop more death.
CPTers run to the front of the crowd and do the same. If the soldiers are going to
fire, they will shoot us first, and we’re banking they won’t.63
Before the demonstration ended with Muslim prayers, CPT members again stood
between Israeli guns and Palestinian demonstrators, leading to the arrest of two team members.
At the conclusion of the event, CPT engaged in other peacemaking efforts, demonstrating the
link between accompaniment and other actions. “Back at the apartment, we begin our follow-up:
61TriciaGatesBrown,ed.,GettingintheWay:StoriesfromChristianPeacemakerTeams(Scottdale,PA:HeraldPress,2005),11.62MarkFrey,“StandingintheGap,”inGettingintheWay:StoriesfromChristianPeacemakerTeams,ed.TriciaGatesBrown(Scottdale,PA:HeraldPress,2005),71.63Ibid.,73.
Boyd 25
calling our Israeli partners, the media, and CPT’s Chicago office, writing press releases, and
locating Sara and Pierre.”64
Commenting on the effectiveness of CPT’s peacemaking methodology, team member
Jerry Levin explains: “I don’t think [about] turning the situation around here immediately, or
even in the short- or mid-term. But I think we’re part of a movement that’s trying, that is
succeeding one person at a time or two people at a time…in demonstrating that there is a
nonviolent way to deal with conflict.”65
Mediation
Mediation has been defined as “an intervention in a conflict, by an actor not a party to the
dispute, aimed at helping the parties resolve their conflict peacefully through negotiation and
compromise.”66 This problem solving technique can be used at both the micro and macro social
levels. Assefa lists seven required characteristics of successful mediators, characteristics that will
be demonstrated in the subsequent examples:
1. Impartiality regarding the issues in the dispute; 2. Independence from all parties
to the conflict; 3. The respect of and acceptability to all protagonists; 4. The
knowledge and skill to deal with the issues; 5. Possession of the required physical
resources, e.g., meeting site, transportation and communication facilities, persons
for verification and inspection services; 6. International support for the mediator;
and 7. Leverage, i.e., the possibility for the mediator to put pressure on one or
both parties to accept a proposed settlement.67
64Ibid.,76.65StevePetrou,PeacemakersintheHolyLand,Online,Documentary,2006,http://www.veoh.com/collection/PeppersprayProductionsindymediaPres/watch/v5765287yMfR2be.66HizkiasAssefa,MediationofCivilWars:ApproachesandStrategies‐‐TheSudanConflict(Boulder,CO:WestviewPress,1987),4.67Ibid.,22‐23.
Boyd 26
One significant example of mediation at macro social level occurred during the civil war
in Sudan, where the World Council of Churches (WCC) played a pivotal role in negotiations
between northern and southern groups.68 Assefa highlights the importance of the seven
characteristics listed above in relation to civil wars because governments have unique political
demands relating to other dissident groups, national sovereignty, and the international status of
the rebels.69 Because of these special concerns, the first groups (i.e., Presidents of Uganda and
Ghana and the Movement for Colonial Freedom or MCF), who attempted to build bridges
between the government in Khartoum and the Southern Sudan Liberation Movement/Army
(SSLM/A) had been unfruitful; however, the WCC fit the criteria.
Growing divisions between the Arab north and the underdeveloped African south trace
back to the 1820s with the conquering of the area by the Viceroy of Egypt under the Ottoman
Empire.70 As the scheduled date for Sudanese independence from Britain and Egypt approached
(January 1, 1956), the south feared domination by the north. In an atmosphere of distrust,
segments of the military loyal to the south mutinied in1955, marking the beginning of the civil
war that would last until mediation efforts in the early 1970s.
The WCC, in partnership with the All Africa Conference of Churches (AACC), took
over the mediation efforts in 1970 when the south felt the MCF was no longer impartial but
favored the government in Khartoum. The WCC and AACC were acceptable to sides of the
conflict because they had offered material aid to those affected in the south since 1965 while not
being publicly critical of the north as other missionaries were who had been forced to leave in
68Assefa,MediationofCivilWars:ApproachesandStrategies‐‐TheSudanConflict.69Ibid.,29.70Ibid.,37.
Boyd 27
1962. 71 Furthermore, a preliminary study by the WCC and AACC convinced the government
that they had a “fair and objective” understanding of the issues.72
After a successful initial visit with the Sudanese government in May 1971, the
WCC/AACC delegation began to contact all parties with ties to or significant interests in
southern Sudan, including civil and political leaders as well as exiled Southerners in Zaire,
Uganda, Kenya, and Ethiopia. These behind-the-scenes communications limited the ability of the
various actors to publicly use the peace process to their advantage and enabled the mediators to
gain a deeper understanding of each stakeholder’s positions.
The WCC/AACC delegation continued to shuttle between the parties, assessing levels of
commitment and passing messages between them. These secret communications eventually
culminated in preliminary talks on November 9, 1971, in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. In addition to
leaders of the WCC and AACC, a representative of the Sudan Council of Churches was also on
hand.73 Between this date and the formal talks beginning February 15, 1972, there was a flurry of
activity on all sides as each party attempted to strengthen its position.
Religious expression was prominent throughout the peace talks. The chair of the talks,
Burgess Carr, began the negotiations with a sermon about Nehemiah rebuilding the walls of
Jerusalem, a story supported by both the Old Testament and the Koran.74 Mid-way through the
process of moving from surface issues to deeper, more complex issues, Carr began using prayer
more regularly, asking “all members to stand up and pray silently every time negotiation over a
major issue area concluded in agreement.”75 At the conclusion of the talks, “Carr stood up and
started to pray aloud, rather than silently as he had done whenever a major issue in the
71Ibid.,94‐95.72Ibid.,106.73Ibid.,122.74Ibid.,134.75Ibid.,137.
Boyd 28
negotiation was settled. He said that he was crying as he prayed, and some members of the
delegations were also crying.”76
The end of negotiations did not complete the work of religious institutions. Various exiles
and members of the SSLM objected to the negotiated settlement, so church organizations began
meeting with dissident groups to explain the agreement and build support for it. When these
questions were settled and the peace accords were ratified, the WCC/AACC delegation
continued to be involved by escorting southern leadership to Khartoum and by participating in
the early process of implementation.77
This example of church sponsored mediation highlights the role that Christian
associations can have in promoting peace. Unfortunately, the agreement only lasted a little more
than a decade. In 1983 the Second Sudanese Civil War began, in many ways due to the same
contentions underlying the first civil war. This demonstrates the on-going nature of Christian
peacemaking; violence can occur at any time, and peacemakers must be ready to respond.
Catholic and Protestant churches also played critical roles in ending Mozambique’s civil
war in 1992.78 In 1975 Mozombique gained its independence from Portugal. Devastated by the
loss of more than 200,000 Portuguese settlers who had formed much of the country’s economic
and civic backbone, the nation had significant challenges from its inception. The new president
was the leader of The Front for the Liberation of Mozambique (FRELIMO), a group with
Marxist ideology. Resistance to FRELIMO coalesced into the opposition group, Mozambique
National Resistance (RENAMO). The civil war that began in the early 1980s between these two
groups would kill over a million people and displace up to eight million others before the peace
agreement was signed in 1992. 76Ibid.,142.77Ibid.,148.78LederachandAppleby,“StrategicPeacebuilding:AnOverview.”
Boyd 29
Despite pressure and disruption from FRELIMO during the civil war, the actions of
Christian leaders and organizations during the conflict laid the ground work for role the Church
would play in the negotiation process. Even though various church denominations favored
different parties, “the religious communities…constituted the nation’s civil society.”79 For
example, the Marxist state recognized that “churches were providing essential social services—
such as the distribution of food and clothing, education, and health care—which the state itself
was unable to supply.”80
One active group during the war years was the Community of Sant’Egidio, a Catholic
organization. Members of Sant’Egidio made efforts to build trusting relationships with leaders of
both FRELIMO and RENAMO, and even reached out to Muslim communities. Social services
and education were promoted for all, and a 1984 meeting with government officials, “led to the
establishment of a program, supported by the Italian government at Sant’Egidio’s request, to
deliver massive shipments of food and medicine.”81
When the president was killed in an airplane accident in 1987 and a new government was
formed, Sant’Egidio and the Mozambican Christian Council (CCM) were able to begin the
process of initiating peace talks. The joint delegation became known as the Peace and
Reconciliation Commission, and in 1989 they held preliminary peace talks in Nairobi, Kenya.
The following year formal peace negotiations began under the auspices of the Commission, and
in conjunction with other national and international leaders
representatives of Sant’Egidio were able to maintain a momentum for peace
among the two parties over the course of ten rounds of talks, which were held
from 1990 to 1992 in the sixteenth-century Carmelite convent in Rome that serves 79Ibid.,19.80Ibid.,20.81Ibid.,29.
Boyd 30
as the international headquarters for Sant’Egidio. Following two closing summits,
the General Peace Accord was signed on October 4, 1992.82
In contrast to these examples of mediating civil wars, the Mennonite church in Colombia
realized that mediation could be useful at the local level, in communities around the country
where small-scare conflicts needed resolution. Because of a backlog of court cases, the
government passed a law allowing communities to establish mediation centers. In response, the
church established the Center for Conflict Analysis and Transformation in 1994, as well as a
cyclical training program (Permanent Course) designed to prepare community mediators.83 The
practice and social analysis of the Center opened the leaders’ eyes to the roots of many of the
conflicts. Consequently, the vision has expanded “beyond training mediators, to fostering
transformation into a community of peace through justice. Mediation is just one of the strategies
for building a peace that is integrated with justice, nonviolence, human rights, and politics.”84
The relationships formed through the Permanent Course, the Center, and local community
mediation work have formalized into the Network of Community Justice and Treatment of
Conflict.85
Justapaz has also brought mediation into the public school system. Work began in
Mennonite primary schools, but as the reputation of the program spread, it was invited to teach
mediation skill in government schools. This has been done through the Program for
82Ibid.,30.83RicardoEsquiviaandPaulStucky,“BuildingPeacefromBelowandInside:TheMennoniteExperienceinColombia,”inFromtheGroundUp:MennoniteContributionstoInternationalPeacebuilding,ed.CynthiaSampsonandJohnPaulLederach(NewYork,NY:OxfordUniversityPress,2000),135.84Ibid.,136.85Ibid.,138.
Boyd 31
Peacebuilding in School Settings. The school program has expanded to include teachers, parents
and administrators.86
Similar to the community mediation established in Colombia by Mennonites, the
Evangelical Friends Church (Quaker) in Burundi has also promoted conflict transformation. This
has been done through establishing community training courses and forming the Mission for
Peace and Reconciliation Under the Cross (MIPAREC). One aspect of its mission is
“establishing community reconciliation and peace committees to manage community conflict.”87
Researcher John Brewer describes the ways that Christians have supported mediation in
the context of Northern Ireland, “where there are occasional flashes of high-intensity violence
which require direct intervention but where the normally low-key character of violence provides
some space for local people to learn mediation skills.”88
Formal mediation leadership and training is provided by a number of organizations,
including Corrymeela, Cornerstone, ECONI, and the Irish School of Ecumenics. These groups
engage in “mediation in specific instances of conflict, conflict counseling among protagonists,
the facilitation of discussions and local consultations, and what is called ‘Transforming Conflict
Training’ given to local residents and other involved parties.”89 Additionally, the Mediation
Network works with both religious and non-religious conflicts. Many of the network’s staff
volunteers are Christian, and one is a Mennonite, but it is not an explicitly religious organization.
Informal mediation at the grassroots level is also quite common in Northern Ireland,
primarily involving the clergy in “ad hoc, emergency-style intervention in disputes in the local
86Ibid.,136‐137.87PhilippeNakuwundi,“HealinginBurundi,”inSeekingPeaceinAfrica:StoriesfromAfricanPeacemakers,ed.DonaldE.Milleretal.(Telford,PA:CascadiaPublishing,2007),126.88Brewer,“NorthernIreland:PeacemakingamongProtestantsandCatholics,”79.89Ibid.
Boyd 32
neighborhood.”90 This work is done despite the risk of violence toward the clergy, even violence
perpetrated by those of the same denomination who do not wish any cooperation or collaboration
with those from other faith communities.
Irrespective of the risks, the leaderships of the churches have frequently taken a
proactive stance in facilitating discussion and negotiation. One example has
been the valuable work of the Church of Ireland Primate, Archbishop Robin
Eames, and Presbyterian minister Roy Magee in brokering the Loyalist
paramilitary cease-fire in 1995.91
Less structured forms of mediation have also proven successful in some locations. For
example, a peacemaking methodology termed the People-to-People Peace Process was
effectively used in southern Sudan at Peace and Reconciliation Conferences before the end of the
north-south civil war that devastated the country. When southern forces splintered and violence
between people groups in the south increased, the church realized it could and should work to
promote reconciliation. To this end the New Sudan Council of Churches (NSCC), “seized the
opportunity and effectively stepped into the unknown, committed to assisting the promotion of
peace among southerners.”92
Because internationally sponsored peace events had generally ignored the local context of
peacemaking—listening, mutual respect, restoring relationships, and a bottom-up approach—the
church encouraged shared Christian and traditional African values at the 1994 Akobo
Conference. The inter-tribal conflict between the Jikany and Lou was centered on a dispute
regarding grazing land that had escalated to the point that many people had died on both sides.
90Ibid.,80.91Ibid.92JuliaAkerDuany,“SouthSudan:People‐to‐PeoplePeacemaking:ALocalSolutiontoLocalProblems,”inArtisansofPeace:GrassrootsPeacemakingamongChristianCommunities,ed.MaryAnnCejkaandThomasBamat(Maryknoll,NY:Orbis,2003),215‐216.
Boyd 33
After preliminary dialogue had been fostered, the Conference was schedule for further
conversation.
Over 5,000 participants attended the conference to discuss water usage, grazing and
fishing “under the mediation of a chairperson or moderators chosen by consensus among the
people.93 “Women played a particularly effective witnessing role at the conference, acting as an
informal ‘truth commission.’ Each a maan naath (mother of the nation), the Nuer women would
shout down any man whose accounts contained falsehoods.”94 After much discussion over forty-
five days, the consensus agreement was endorsed by the local authority, and the peacemaking
process received support to be used for future conflicts.
At the request of local churches that had gained trust for the NSCC,95 it was asked to host
more conferences, including one in 1999 to address grievances between the Nuer and Dinka
tribes relating to grazing and fishing.96 Before the conference, chiefs visited each other’s territory
to commit to the peace process. After these regional ceremonies, the Peace and Reconciliation
Conference convened with local and international observers.
The first three days of the conference were set aside for storytelling between
Dinka and Nuer. In this first round of dialogue, key issues were identified.
Following that, working groups met to propose resolutions. Then the entire
conference met for dialogue about the proposals and to reach a consensus on the
final resolutions.97
These examples of mediation, as well as the other activities described here, demonstrate
that religious persons and organizations must work in concert with other parties. “Successful
93Ibid.,222.94Ibid.,217.95Ibid.,220.96Ibid.,218‐219.97Ibid.,219.
Boyd 34
religious peacebuilding usually involves collaboration with other civil society actors,
governments, and international institutions.”98
Conscientious Objection
Although conscientious objection is not a direct response to ending violence in society, it
is an action that seeks to avoid participating in violence that the state defines as compulsory.
Young men and women today have considerable freedom in avoiding military duty because of
the commitment and sacrifices of those in earlier times who worked to achieve these freedoms.
In many other countries this is still not the case; avoiding compulsory military duty can bring
significant negative consequences.
For example, there were no legal exemptions for conscientious objectors (COs) in
Colombia when the Mennonite church began to grow there in the 1940s and 50s. In the 1980s the
church focused more attention on this issue. Partnerships with the Columbian Confederation of
Evangelical Churches (then CEDEC, now CEDECOL) and a Jesuit group among others,
developed during this time, and the network of Christian groups formed the Collective for
Conscientious Objection in 1990 after the Mennonite church founded Justapaz with
conscientious objection as one of its primary foci.99
Justapaz began teaching churches about the topic using Quaker-designed workshops, and
also campaigned to make a national constitutional amendment to allow conscientious objection.
While this was not fully successful, an exception to military service was made for seminary
students. To take advantage of this opening, the church opened the Seminary for the Training of
98Powers,“ReligionandPeacebuilding,”325.99EsquiviaandStucky,“BuildingPeacefromBelowandInside:TheMennoniteExperienceinColombia,”129.
Boyd 35
Peacemakers, which including training in human rights, conscientious objection, the theology of
nonviolence, social ethics, history, conflict transformation, and ecology among other topics.100
Publications
Whether used for violence or for peace, information is a powerful weapon. Gathering and
sharing information can take many forms, print materials being one of the most common
communication tools used in peacemaking.
On the island of Sri Lanka, Tamils and Sinhalese waged a vicious civil war from 1983
until 2009. One notable peacemaking effort during the violence was a group composed of
Sinhalese Roman Catholic youth—Kitusara, meaning, “Light of Christ.” Publishing books and
magazines was one of their major tools for raising awareness and building the values needed for
peace.101 In 1990 the youth began publishing a self-titled monthly news magazine informing the
Sinhalese in the south of the atrocities endured by the Tamil at the hands of the Sinhalese
government. A second magazine published by these Sinhalese youth is actually for and by
Tamils, giving them the resources to document their own experience of the conflict. The content
includes the hardships, “of soldier families, widows, and orphans; the poverty that drives young
men and women to become soldiers; the inalienable right of Tamils to their land; protests in the
South against the war; and the enormous war expenditure.”102
In addition to these periodicals, Kitusara also published, Sanvedi (“Sensitivity”), a book
decrying the uselessness of the war. After noting that people were willing to die for war but not
for peace, a subsequent book was published telling the stories of four priests who died as martyrs
100Ibid.,131‐133.101Wijesinghe,“SriLanka:PropheticInitiativesamidstDeadlyConflict,”181.102Ibid.
Boyd 36
for peace. These publication efforts are the main focus of Kitusara, though other actions—
visitations, concerts, and lobbying—have also been engaged at times.103
Rallies, Vigils and Demonstrations
Public events have been used by Christian peacemakers to build solidarity, draw attention
to injustices, and promote values that strengthen society. For instance, in Northern Ireland a
range of public gatherings and actions has been sponsored by various peace and reconciliation
organizations for these purposes.104 Women Together and Community Dialogue has used public
meetings to bring highlight those who are suffering and to educate the public on policy issues.
Other groups have organized “peacemaking events, such as the ‘Light a Candle on Christmas
eve’ peace campaign, ‘Friendship Seats’ in parks…and ‘Stamp Out Sectarianism Roadshows’ in
shopping centers, festivals, sports arenas, and the like.”105 Furthermore, since 1968 Protestant
and Catholic Encounter has used “drama, carol services, and readings, as well as anti-sectarian
projects, ecumenical services, and prayer meetings.”106
In Asia, similar public events have also been hosted to promote the peace agenda. The
Centre for Society and Religion (CSR), which was founded by Catholic priests in the early
1970s, has promoted peace in schools and in other village forums. A significant rally, Sama
Jeevanaya (“Lifegiving Peace”) was held in 1999, bringing together youth from villages across
the country. A joint declaration by the attendees declared their hopes and ideals for the country:
We the youth of this country refuse to kill or be killed. We do not wish to carry
forward a conflict created by our political ancestors. We wish to till our land and
103Ibid.,181‐182.104Brewer,“NorthernIreland:PeacemakingamongProtestantsandCatholics,”85‐86.105Ibid.,85.106Ibid.
Boyd 37
live in peace and harmony. We call on you, our leaders, to work out an
acceptable, honourable, just and sustainable solution to the present conflict.107
Part III: Case Study—Liberia
The peacemaking efforts of Leymah Gbowee and the others who joined the Women of
Liberia Mass Action for Peace were instrumental in bringing about the signing of
Comprehensive Peace Agreement in Accra, Ghana, on August 18, 2003. This agreement, which
was signed after Liberia’s president, Charles Taylor, had already been indicted for war crimes by
the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL), ended Liberia’s second civil war, which had begun in
1999.
Liberia’s history of violence makes this peace agreement all the more noteworthy.
Beginning in 1822 the American Colonization Society began repatriating former slaves to
Liberia. These returnees, Americo-Liberians, were established as the ruling elite when Liberia
was founded in 1847.
Given a land to govern, they built their system of rule on the only political and
administrative system with which they were familiar: the system of the
plantations in the United States’ deep south. The main difference was, of course
that this time they were the ‘masters’ and the indigenous population in the country
they had been given to govern became their slaves.108
The minority elite ruled the country in this manner for the next century, enriching
themselves and disenfranchising the broader society. “Liberia was de facto both a one-party state
and an apartheid state.”109 This trend might have continued had the prices for the two major
107Wijesinghe,“SriLanka:PropheticInitiativesamidstDeadlyConflict,”176.108MortenBøås,“TheLiberianCivilWar:NewWar/OldWar?,”GlobalSociety:JournalofInterdisciplinaryInternationalRelations19,no.1(January2005):76.109Ibid.
Boyd 38
exports—rubber and iron ore—not plummeted, significantly decreasing the elites’ ability to fund
their control of government and social structures. “The decline in market values for primary
products coupled with a long-standing progressive movement for more open, inclusive
government paved the way for a military coup in 1980, rigged elections in 1985 and [the first]
civil war from 1989 to 1996.”110
In 1997 warlord Charles Taylor was elected President of Liberia; however, widespread
discontent with his leadership catalyzed further rebellion, and in 1999 the Liberians United for
Reconciliation and Democracy (LURD) and other groups began armed conflict with the purpose
of ousting Taylor. This Second Liberian Civil War was especially destructive. “The real losers
were the civilians who lived in these areas. First LURD would occupy a village and plunder it.
Then Taylor’s forces would come and chase LURD away, and in turn plunder what little there
was left.”111 Child conscription, mutilation, murder and rape were weapons of war which left no
one safe.
It is within this violent context that the heroic efforts of Leymah Gbowee and the other
peacemakers are set.112 Gbowee had an unusual entrance into peacemaking efforts. She recalls,
“I had a dream, and it was like a crazy dream, that someone was actually telling me to get the
women of the church together to pray for peace.” Even though she felt like “the wrong person for
God to be speaking to,” because she did not consider herself a “Holy Ghost-filled Christian,” she
went to her friends and shared the idea. She felt unfit to be their leader, but they insisted. “After
they convinced me, we started this journey together. Then I realize that every problem we’d
110MaryH.MoranandM.AnnePitcher,“The‘BasketCase’andthe‘PosterChild’:ExplainingtheEndofCivilConflictsinLiberiaandMozambique,”ThirdWorldQuarterly25,no.3(2004):505.111Bøås,“Theliberiancivilwar,”85.112Unlessotherwisenoted,thestoriesofGboweeandtheMassActionforPeacearetakenfromtheaward‐winningdocumentary,PraytheDevilBacktoHell(boththefilmandtheadditionalinterviewincludedontheDVD),directedbyGiniReticker(ForkFilms,2008).
Boyd 39
encounter on this journey, I’m going to rise above it and lead these women because they trusted
me with their lives and their future.”
In June 2002 Gbowee stood in front of a large congregation in Monrovia, the capital of
Liberia, and declared, “We feel it’s now time to rise up and speak, but we don’t want to do this
alone. We want to invite the other Christian churches to come and let’s put our voices together.”
This call for “ordinary mothers, grandmothers, aunts, [and] sisters” to join in prayer led to the
formation of the Christian Women Peace Initiative.
Asatu Bah Kenneth, the Assistant Director of the Liberian National Police, heard
Gbowee’s call. She went in front of the congregation with Gbowee and announced, “I am the
only Muslim woman in this church….We’re all serving the same God. This is not only for the
Christian women….I’m going to move it forward with the Muslim women.” Thus, from the
beginning this was a movement of both Christian and Muslim women.
The role of religion in this conflict is further complicated by Taylor’s own claims to
God’s blessing and providence. In a church declared to the congregation:“I’m here because the
One that created me to launch this revolution, and I tell you, if God did not want me—I’m not
here because I wanted to be here. Because the only person that could have protected me over the
past five to six years is Jehovah God Almighty!”
Even though Taylor’s actions and policies argued against his true adherence to the faith,
the women realized that if they wanted to put pressure on Taylor, they would need the support of
the respected religious leaders of the country. Similarly, since the leaders of the LURD were
Muslim, the key to reaching them would be through the Muslim women and their Imams. Efforts
to communicate their situations and desires to the religious leaders of both faiths were pursued.
Boyd 40
As the civil war became more intense around Monrovia, the women realized they needed
to do something “more forceful, more dramatic,” so they decided to protest. A Catholic woman
who worked for Radio Veritas, Catholic radio station, announced a peace festival and rally.
Gbowee gives the background to the event: “We went back to the Bible. We saw what Esther did
for her people, that she went in sackclothes and ashes, saying, ‘I mean it.’” Dressed in white to
signify peace, they looked for a “strategic point” to encounter Taylor and get his attention. They
settled on the fish market, and hundreds of women—Christian and Muslim, local and displaced
women (IDPs)—participated in the daily sit-ins.
In the face of the potential for harm, the woman stood firm. One woman was warned by
her mother not to join the demonstration. “They will beat you people; they will kill you.” She
responded by saying, “Well, if I should get killed, just remember me, that I was fighting for
peace.” At one point there were more than 2,500 women demonstrating together, singing,
chanting and holding signs for peace.
After a week of daily demonstrations at the market, President Taylor did not address
them directly. Despite the apparent lack of impact, the women bonded as they got to know each
other during this period. As they talked about their desperation, they developed a new plan—a
sex strike. Each women was instructed to tell her husband, “Look, if you have any power to put
stop to the war, you go and do it.” Gbowee shares, “Men were the perpetrators of violence, so
either by commission or omission, you were guilty.” Then the men were praying equally with
their wives for the end of the war! Regardless, both Taylor and the rebel groups refused to begin
peace talks.
Group reflection on the effectiveness of their mass actions was an important part of the
movement. Gbowee explains: “A lot of the things we did weren’t really planned, but every day
Boyd 41
what we did was after we did one action, we sat down and analyzed how effective it was. So it
wasn’t just protesting and going to sleep at night. So if we were there ‘til twelve midnight, we
would still find one hour to sit to evaluate the work that we did. That was one strategy that we
used from the beginning. So every day the protest got better. All of the sluggish things we started
with on the first day we didn’t repeat on the second day, on the third day. So it just got from one
stage of being strategic to the other. And I and some of the woman had read…different
nonviolent action. I read King. I read Gandhi. I had read about the Nigerian women seizing the
Shell oil place in Nigeria in the Niger Delta. Different things. And people brought different ideas
every day. As we did these things, we came back and said, ‘Let’s look at this differently.”
Through this cycle of action and reflection, the women decided to issue a position
statement to the Liberian government presenting the case for beginning peace talks. They were
careful not to speak about politics per se, so as not to be arrested. They highlighted the word
peace. As the women marched to Parliament to present their statement, more and more women
joined the procession. Kenneth describes the reason for escalating their efforts. “[W] didn’t care
if we had jobs or not, whether we had food or not, because if we never had peace, you wouldn’t
have job. Your children wouldn’t have gone to school, my husband wouldn’t work.”
Finally, President Taylor could no longer ignore the demonstrations, and he met with the
women on April 23, 2003. “Going to meet Taylor that day was the moment that I’ve lived for,”
declares Gbowee. With hundreds of women praying for her, Gbowee, introduced as the
coordinator of the Women’s Peace Building Network, stood in front of the gathered crowd of
demonstrators and delivered the group’s position statement. She proclaimed with confidence,
“We are tired of war. We are tired of running. We are tired of begging for bulgar wheat. We are
tired of our children being raped. We are now taking this stand, to secure the future of our
Boyd 42
children. Because we believe as custodians of society, tomorrow our children will ask us,
‘Mama, what was your role during the crisis?’
Following this presentation, Taylor finally agreed to begin peace talks with the rebels
groups. This meant the women had to focus on getting the rebels to also agree to join talks. Two
of the women, Asatu Bah Kenneth and Atweda “Sugars” Cooper went to Freetown, Sierra
Leone, to meet with some of the rebel leaders. They made a presence there so that others in
western Africa would know the level of seriousness of the peace movement. Together, Liberian
and Sierra Leonian women waited outside the leaders’ motel and along the travel route ready to
meet them.
Kenneth pointed out to the leaders, “Your mothers have come this far to talk to you. Your
sisters have come this far. If you don’t go, don’t you know these people will die in Monrovia?
And don’t you think you will be guilty that you are also responsible for their death?” The
presence of women from areas control by Taylor’s forces and areas controlled by the rebels
along with the voicing of human rights abuses committed by both sides enabled the women to be
neutral middle figures that did not support one faction over another. Eventually, they agreed to
join the peace talks in Ghana, talks that were expected to last approximately two weeks.
With the government and rebels committed to the talks, the women had to begin raising
money so they could send representatives as well both to observe the talks and to mobilize the
refugees who were already living in Ghana. Gbowee underscores this importance:
We realized that if we stayed back in Liberia, the idea of the struggle would be in
vain….Because when we started the protest, the idea was that we needed for the
media to see that…there was another side to this story—the women and children
that were affected. Because all we saw on CNN were footages of fighting and
Boyd 43
bombing and interviews with Taylor and the rebel leaders, and we wanted them to
see that there were victims to all of this glorified media attention given to these
boys with guns. We were the victims.
She continues, “We are the conscience sitting out here. We are calling to their conscience
to do the right thing…to give the Liberian women and their children the peace that they so
desperately need.”
Surprisingly, on the first day of the talks, Charles Taylor was indicted for war crimes. He
hurried back to Liberia leaving his representatives to continue the talks, which were now in
complete disarray. Sensing the urgency of the situation, rebel leaders decided to commence
fighting in Liberia within the day despite their continued presence at the talks in Ghana. The
women demonstrating in Ghana heard reports of the violence, yet persisted in their vigilance
despite strong desire to be home and care for family that was surely being affected by the
fighting.
General Abdulsalami Abubakar, the chief negotiator and previous President of Nigeria,
viewed the women as allies. “We on the mediation side, we felt the women were doing a good
thing trying to make the men see reason.” These efforts to open the minds and hearts of the men
was an on-going battle with ever changing strategies. One woman explained, “We had to
continuously strategize what to do because the men, they felt the more persons you kill, the
stronger you are and the more people…listen to you on the peace table.”
Not only did the women continue to draw attention to the talks and thereby pressure the
participants to fully engage, they also actively engaged in mediation by talking with various
leaders outside of the official meetings. General Abubakar describes how he viewed the female
protestors. “The women kept going from one delegation the other, from one hotel to the other,
Boyd 44
trying to influence these delegates. And the belligerents have really come to the point they have
just but captured the whole of the government of Liberia. So, during the peace talks, really they
were talking about power, about position, about a job, and the control of the resources.”
All this time the Muslim and Christian women who had remained in Liberia continued
their demonstrations with fasting and praying at the fish market, even during the renewed
fighting. Then they decided to move the demonstration to the American Embassy, ostensibly to
increase media exposure and call for U.S. intervention.
As the peace talks stretched longer and longer, reaching six weeks instead of two, the
women’s desperation began to peak. The delegates were living in luxury at the talks compared
with how they normally lived in the bush and on the front lines, so they had minimal motivation
to negotiate an agreement. General Abubakar admits that the peace talks were stalled. “We were
getting nowhere. And we were really reaching the end of the road.
Finally, the women decided to apply more pressure, and they called for more women to
join the demonstration. The nearly two hundred women then circled the building where the
government and rebel leaders were talking, locked arms to form a chain, and refused to allow the
delegates to leave or get food and water until they had signed a peace agreement. Security came
and said they were going to arrest the leader, Gbowee, for obstructing justice. The irony of this
phrase pushed her to the breaking point, and she threatened to strip naked in protest. She
explains:
That moment of rage when you’ve been disgraced, and you’ve been walked on,
when your pride has been just, there is nothing left, when people think they’ve
taken everything from you, you decide you’re giving them some of what they
thought they’ve taken away. I feel that’s the greatest pain any woman can feel, so
Boyd 45
at that moment, here am I barricading a hall where you have a bunch of people
who have killed people for about fourteen years, and here are these guys living in
a…peaceful country, and they’re arresting me for obstructing justice. There was,
for me at that moment, the world had turned into something that I never
knew….That moment, was like this is a world where no one cares. And if they
don’t care, you should not care. You do whatever you can do to get people to
know that you’re hurting.
The film’s producer, Abigail Disney, shares how this threat affected the peace talks.
“[W]e had an opportunity to sit with one of the warlords who’d been present at the peace talks,
and I asked him, ‘How is it possible in a country where fifty-percent of the women have been
raped for one woman threatening to strip naked to cause such mayhem?’” He answered:
“[Y]ou have to understand they were our mothers, and the only way your mother
would do that is if she were driven to total desperation. And there was something
in that moment there that caused everyone man in that room, no matter what he’d
done during the conflict, to ask himself, ‘What have I done? What have I done to
get us here?’ And talk about changing the dynamic of the room. You know, that
was the last thing on Earth that would’ve happened in the hearts of those men had
the woman…abandoned the moral discourse, had they…acted the way they were
being persuaded to act.”
Eventually the women were convinced to let the delegates out, though the demonstrators
vowed they would do the same action again in two weeks if an agreement had not been made.
The women insisted, “This peace talk has to be a real peace talk, not a circus.” Gbowee
threatened that if they had to do another sit-in, another lockdown, it would be even bigger. “And
Boyd 46
next time, we will be more than 1,000. There are over 25,000 women at the Buduburam refugee
camp. There are over 10,000 Liberian women living in Accra. We can do it, and we will do it
again.” In harmony with this sentiment, international supporters threatened to withdraw funding
if a breakthrough was not made. Two weeks later an agreement was signed.
Included in the terms of the cease fire, President Taylor would go into exile in Nigeria,
and in his place an interim government would prepare the way for democratic elections. To
restore security, UN Peacekeepers were deployed on August 4, 2003. The celebration was
exuberant when the women returned from Ghana to Liberia. Gbowee describes this powerful
experience as children sang one of the demonstrators’ theme songs, “‘We want peace, no more
war. We want peace, so no more war’ until we just had this train of children following us all of
the time. That was the moment for us.”
It would have been easy for the women to return to their homes and the work of restoring
their local communities, but they realized they had to continue to be involved with the rebuilding
of the nation, not just their individual homes. Continued demonstrations let the transitional
government know that they were still observing and still playing a part in reconstruction. Their
presence was also helpful in other ways, such as helping to restore order when the disarmament
process deteriorated into chaos.
This vigilance was also directed at the mending of the nation’s social garment. One
participant shared her perspective: “Peace is a process. It’s not an event. When the guns are put
down, we have to continue to build the peace. We have to accept our combatants into our midst.
We cannot hold it against them.” Another woman who finds it hard to reconcile with them still
faces her own question, “How can we move on if we do not forgive?” Gbowee shared this anger
Boyd 47
for the ex-child soldiers, but her feelings began to change as she worked with them. “I realized
that a lot of them were as much victims as we were.”
At this point, the women’s actions for ending violence, for resolving the outright conflict
(column 4 in my taxonomy), were ended. Next, they used their new-found confidence, respect,
organization, and voice to support community building for a new Liberia (taxonomy column 5).
“Women were determined this time to make a difference,” stated one woman. Gbowee adds,
“We believed that until we had elected democracy, Liberia would not know true peace. We
decided to keep working and going to the field until that day came.”
This political action culminated in the election of Ellen Johnson Sirleaf on January 17,
2006, the first female president in Africa. In her inaugural speech, she acknowledged “the
powerful voice of women from all walks of life whose votes brought us to victory. They
defended me. They worked with me. They prayed for me. It is the women who labored and
advocated for peace throughout our region.” Gbowee calls the peacework the cake and the
election of Sirleaf as the icing. Contemplating the campaign’s success, one woman reflected, “If
we had not had different women from different walks of life banding together, we may not have
been able to solve the problem.”
The woman ended the mass action campaign and left the field by the fish market after
two and a half years. Echoing Charles Taylor’s departing words when he went into exile that he
would be back, God willing, Gbowee declared at the conclusion of the mass campaign,
“Liberians knew that if things ever got bad again, we would be back.”
While it is true that the activities of the women did not single-handedly bring down the
Taylor regime, they played a critical role in applying social pressure to the warring factions. It is
acknowledged that “the military successes of LURD and MODEL, the presence of ECOWAS
Boyd 48
troops, and the threat of US intervention in the form of troop-carrying ships visible off the
coast”113 all played a part in bring an end to Taylor’s regime and the beginning of the process of
rebuilding democratic institutions.
These grassroots activists prayed together, worshiped together, strategized together, stood
in the sun and rain together, demonstrated together, traveled together, and overcame together.
Paying attention to top level actors such as national and international leaders when analyzing
conflict is useful; however, if used exclusively, this approach has “elite and structuralist biases”
that “overlook the important roles that social forces and local organisations can play in
demanding the compliance of their leaders, in the implementation of peace accords, in their
maintenance once they are established, and in the shape of reconstruction efforts.”114 The story
of the Women of Liberia Mass Action for Peace demonstrates this dramatically by showing what
would be missed if the actions of Charles Taylor and the other warlords were the only pieces of
information to be included in society’s collective memory of Liberia’s Second Civil War.
In May of 2009, three years after the election of Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Leymah Gbowee
received the John F. Kennedy Profiles in Courage Award. At the ceremony, Caroline Kennedy
stated, “By bringing together women of all religions, ethnic groups and walks of life to stand up,
sit in and speak out against violence and in favor of peace, reconciliation and progress, they
played a crucial role in restoring democracy to their war-torn country.”115
Conclusion
The case study of the peace action in Liberia demonstrates a number of important
elements of this study. First, it demonstrates the roles that actors from the grassroots to the top
113MoranandPitcher,“The‘BasketCase’andthe‘PosterChild’:ExplainingtheEndofCivilConflictsinLiberiaandMozambique,”516.114Ibid.,503.115“KennedyPeacePrizeGoestoLeymahGboweeofLiberia,”NewYorkAmsterdamNews(NewYork,NY,May21,2009),2.
Boyd 49
national leaders play in the peacemaking process. Second, the story brings together many of the
peace actions described separately in Part II, showing how they may be used in concert to bolster
their collective influence. Third, the movement from ending conflict to rebuilding a community
after a level of order is restored is seen as the women move from supporting negotiations to
helping to elect the next president. That is, the Liberian story demonstrates how portions of the
taxonomy are in relation to the others. While there are many other forms of violence that can be
addressed by Christian peacemakers—domestic abuse, gang violence, criminal activity—the
stories in Parts II and III give Christian peacemakers a starting playbook for reflection as they
seek for God-honoring ways to work for the peace of their city, their society, their world.
Boyd 50
Appendix A – The Peacemakers’ Techniques116
(David Little)
“[M]any of the Peacemakers’ techniques are comparable to the methodologies employed by
secular social justice workers….But what ultimately distinguishes the Peacemakers is their
ability to use religion, as a source of motivation and as a practical tool….Also significant is that
their peacemaking techniques sometimes involve active efforts to address and stop ongoing
conflicts; sometimes focus on creating the societal preconditions for achieving a sustainable
peace; and sometimes do both simultaneously.”117
Ten Techniques
1. The use of religious texts.
2. The power of the pulpit.
3. Using religious and cultural rituals and traditions.
4. The use of religion in debate and finding common ground.
5. Peace education as the foundation for ending conflict and sustaining peace.
6. Religious peacemaking through the use of communication skills.
7. Creating philosophies of nonviolence and Zones of Peace.
8. Interfaith mobilization as a tool in peacebuilding.
9. Awakening the global community.
116AllmaterialpresentedineachoftheAppendixesiscopiedfromtheoriginalsource.Noneofthismaterialisoriginalwithme.TheseAppendixesarepresentedasreferencematerialforpeaceactivists.117Little,PeacemakersinAction:ProfilesofReligioninConflictResolution,9‐10.
Boyd 51
10. Adapting secular and western practices for religious peacemaking.118
118Ibid.,10‐19.
Boyd 52
Appendix B – General Lessons Regarding Religion and Peacebuilding
(David Little)
1. Religion neither causes violence by itself, nor, by contrast, is it without influence,
particularly in its extremist form, on the course and character of violence.
2. Religion is not just a source of violent conflict but also a source of peace.
3. Proper religion exhibits a preference for pursuing peace by peaceful means (nonviolence
over violence) and for combining the promotion of peace with the promotion of justice.
4. Religion dedicated to promoting justice and peace by peaceful means often prompts a
hostile and violent response, at least in the short run.
5. Hostility and violence are best overcome, morally and most likely practically, by favoring
the promotion of justice and peace by peaceful means and by willingly bearing the risks
and costs associated with such activity.
6. Because of their innovative efforts in places such as Afghanistan and South Africa to
overcome gender-based, political injustice and conflict by assertive nonviolence, women
represent a particularly important resource for peace.
7. The question of the use of force in the proper pursuit of peace is unresolved (as far as the
testimony in this book goes) and remains a moral dilemma to be considered.119
119Ibid.,437.
Boyd 53
Appendix C – The Significance of Religion
(David Little)
1. The hermeneutics of peace. “[A]n interpretive framework that begins with the conviction
that the pursuit of justice and peace by peaceful means is a sacred priority in each of the
traditions presented.”120
2. Empathic detachment. “[P]rominent religious identity provides a badge of trustworthiness
and impartiality that can be of great benefit in either formal or informal negotiations.”121
3. Persistent religious concerns and peace agreements. “[T]he rise of religious extremism
in all faith communities should be enough to convince anyone committed to Middle East
peace that a diplomatic paradigm which is rationalist and utilitarian, addressing only
military and economic issues, will never work. What is urgently needed in peacemaking,
[Yehezkel Landau] claims, is concerted understanding of and attention to the specifically
religious dimensions of a conflict, something that will require, at some stage, the active
participation of ‘credible religious authorities.’”122
120Ibid.,438.121Ibid.,440.122Ibid.,441‐442.
Boyd 54
Appendix D – Ten Actions of Just Peacemaking
(Glen Stassen)
1. Support nonviolent direct action.
2. Take independent initiatives to reduce threat.
3. Use cooperative conflict resolution.
4. Acknowledge responsibility for conflict and injustice and seek repentance and
forgiveness.
5. Advance democracy, human rights, and interdependence.
6. Foster just and sustainable economic development.
7. Work with emerging cooperative forces in the international system.
8. Strengthen the United Nations and international efforts for cooperation and human rights.
9. Reduce offensive weapons and weapons trade.
10. Encourage grassroots peacemaking groups and voluntary associations.123
123Stassen,JustPeacemaking:TheNewParadigmfortheEthicsofPeaceandWar.
Boyd 55
Appendix E – Adam Curle’s Progression of Conflict
“From his experiences in Africa and Asia where he worked as a mediator, Curle suggested that
conflict moves along a continuum from unpeaceful to peaceful relationships. This movement can
be charted on a matrix that compares two key elements: the level of power between the parties in
conflict and the level of awareness of conflicting interests and needs.” 124
UNPEACEFUL Relations PEACEFUL
STATIC UNSTABLE DYNAMIC
BA
LAN
CE
3. Negotiation
4. Sustainable Peace
POW
ER
UN
BA
LAN
CED
1. Education
Latent conflict
2. Confrontation
Overt conflict
LOW HIGH
AWARENESS OF CONFLICT
124Lederach,BuildingPeace:SustainableReconciliationinDividedSocieties,64‐65.
Boyd 56
Appendix F – Five Suggestions for Practitioners
(John Paul Lederach & R. Scott Appleby)
“What practical suggestions can we make for those currently working to build peace within their
particular niche, area of expertise or issue, and who seek to become strategic? Speaking directly
to the practitioners, we can identify five.
1. First, the cornerstone of strategic practice is the act of locating oneself within the wider
system of conflict and change.
2. Second, learn to think about your goals in reference to change processes that build and
transform constructively those things that most concern you.
3. Third, focus on clusters of influence and contribution around the change goals.
4. Fourth, identify system change facilitators or existing spaces where system change
converges.
5. Fifth, develop capacity to think simultaneously rather than sequentially.”125
125LederachandAppleby,“StrategicPeacebuilding:AnOverview,”38‐39.
Boyd 57
Appendix G – Five Principles of Strategic Peacebuilding
(John Paul Lederach & R. Scott Appleby)
“These principles animate the basic philosophy of peacebuilding at its most robust and provide a
guideline for assessing the strategic weight of specific initiatives.”126
1. First, strategic peacebuilding is comprehensive. This principle commits us to develop the
lenses that permit us to see the overall picture of needs, actions, vision, and design—the
architecture of peacebuilding.
2. Second, strategic peacebuilding is interdependent. This principle proposes that
peacebuilding is connected to the nature and quality of relationships.
3. Third, strategic peacebuilding is architectonic, that is, it pays attention to design and
infrastructure. This principle demands that we provide the social spaces, logistical
mechanisms, and institutions necessary for supporting the processes of change
engendered to pursue a justpeace.
4. Fourth, strategic peacebuilding is sustainable. This principle emphasizes the long-term
concern for where our activity and energy is leading.
5. Fifth, strategic peacebuilding is integrative. This principle pushes us beyond the visible
aspects of any given activity and requires that we situate the design and assessment of
peacebuilding action in terms of how it links immediate need with the desired vision of
change.127
126Ibid.,40.127Ibid.,40‐41.
Boyd 58
Appendix H – Faith-Based Diplomacy and Reconciliation
(Douglas Johnston & Brian Cox)
“The reconciliation sought by faith-based diplomats causes them to seek:
1. Unity in diversity through active acceptance of the pluralistic nature of life itself in terms
of race, gender, ethnicity, and culture
2. The inclusion of all parties in any final solution, including one’s enemies wherever
possible
3. The peaceful resolution of conflict between individuals and groups (consistent with the
principles of just war theory)
4. Forgiveness as a prerequisite for restoring healthy relationships
5. Social justice as the appropriate basis for a right ordering of relationships.”128
128JohnstonandCox,“Faith‐BasedDiplomacyandPreventiveEngagement,”15‐16.
Boyd 59
Appendix I – Five Characteristics of Faith-Based Diplomacy
(Douglas Johnston & Brian Cox)
“The faith-based diplomat is one whose actions are informed by five characteristics.”129
1. First, there is a conscious dependency on spiritual principles and resources in the conduct
of peacemaking….Faith-based practitioners call into play a range of spiritual tools that
are unavailable to their secular counterparts: prayer, fasting, forgiveness, repentance, and
a wealth of helpful and often inspiring references from sacred scripture.
2. The second characteristic of faith-based practitioners is that they operate with a certain
spiritual authority.
3. The third quality is a pluralistic heart. Faith-based diplomats with a pluralistic heart are
firmly rooted in their own religious traditions, but they understand and respect the
essence of other traditions.
4. The fourth characteristic is a transcendent approach to conflict resolution.
5. The final quality of faith-based intermediaries is their ability to persevere against
overwhelming odds. Their motivation to be reconcilers and peacemakers stems from a
deep sense of religious calling.130
129Ibid.,16.130Ibid.,16‐17.
Boyd 60
Appendix J – Four Modes of Faith-Based Intervention
(Douglas Johnston & Brian Cox)
“Just as there are multiple traits that characterize faith-based diplomacy and multiple dimensions
to the reconciliation that it pursues, so too are there different modes of intervention in this kind
of peacemaking.”131
1. First, there is the offering of a new vision, in which the diplomat encourages the parties to
embrace a new reality and a new relationship with one another.
2. A second mode of intervention is building bridges, a task that involves the development
of tangible and intangible connections between diverse groups so that they can
communicate their respective needs and aspirations more effectively.
3. A third mode involves healing conflict, usually through mediation.
4. Yet another mode of intervention focuses on healing the wounds of history.132
131Ibid.,18.132Ibid.,18‐19.
Boyd 61
Appendix K – CRS Peacebuilding Principles
“Peacebuilding:
• Responds to the root causes of violent conflict, including unjust relationships and
structures, in addition to addressing its effects and symptoms.
• Is based on long-term commitment.
• Uses a comprehensive approach that focuses on the local community while strategically
engaging the middle-range and top levels of leadership.
• Provides a methodology to achieve right relationships that should be integrated into all
programming.
• Builds upon indigenous non-violent approaches to conflict transformation and
reconciliation.
• Requires an in-depth and participatory analysis.
• Is driven by community-defined needs and involves as many stakeholders as possible.
• Is done through partners from the local Church and other organizations who represent the
diversity of where we work and with whom we share common values.
• Strategically includes advocacy at local, national, and global levels to transform unjust
structures and systems.
• Strengthens and contributes to a vibrant civil society that promotes peace.”133
133MarkM.Rogers,TomBamat,andJulieIdeh,eds.,PursuingJustPeace:AnOverviewandCaseStudiesforFaith‐BasedPeacebuilders(Baltimore,MD:CatholicReliefServices,2008),v.
Boyd 62
Appendix L – CRS Best Practices
“A number of practices keep reoccurring throughout many of the dimensions of the
peacebuilding process and the roles discussed for faith-based actors:”134
1. Storytelling emerges over and over as a paramount modus operandi (critical tool). It can
create empathetic bonds between people, clarify misunderstandings, help people explore
their difficult experiences with apology or forgiveness and build the kind of relationships
that can lead to joint implementation of any of the peacebuilding roles.
2. Joint activities frequently hold a special breakthrough power that could take the
peacebuilding effort to a new level — joint accompaniment of those in danger, joint
“walk through history,” joint statements of apology or forgiveness, joint protests, joint
advocacy for all victims, joint worship services or prayer meetings, joint relief and
development projects, mediation of joint agreements, the creation of joint interfaith
institutions, joint choirs, even sharing a cup of coffee as a simple act of hospitality.
3. Faith traditions have a unique contribution to make to peacebuilding in the form of ritual.
Scriptural laments have been used as models for contemporary mourning. Rituals of grief
and memorials for the dead are important for trauma healing….Singing together songs of
the faiths provides a peace witness that touches the heart.
4. Making peacebuilding part of a larger social endeavor is important. Working in
cooperation with schools, media and government will often enhance the educational
program of faith-based peace-building and vice versa.135 134Ibid.,34.
Boyd 63
Appendix M – Four Attitudes of Peacemakers
(Alan Kreider, Eleanor Kreider, & Paulus Widjaja)
1. Vulnerability. “Healthy relationships between human beings are always based on the
willingness to make ourselves vulnerable and to take risks that may come up in that
relationship.”136
2. Humility. “God’s truth is bigger than we have yet seen, and we cannot get the full
measure of God’s truth without others.”137
3. Commitment to the safety of others. “We will try not to wound people even when they are
our enemies, because we believe that God’s desire is to build friendship out of
enmity.”138
4. Hope. “[O]ur mission as Christians is not primarily to bring solutions to the world’s
problems, but to bring hope for redemption. We believe that Jesus is Lord of all, and that
his Lordship can express itself in surprising ways—and in the most unlikely places.”139
135Ibid.,34‐35.136AlanKreider,EleanorKreider,andPaulusWidjaja,ACultureofPeace:God'sVisionfortheChurch(Intercourse,PA:GoodBooks,2005),76.137Ibid.,76‐77.138Ibid.,78.139Ibid.,78‐79.
Boyd 64
Appendix N – Four Skills of Peacemakers
(Alan Kreider, Eleanor Kreider, & Paulus Widjaja)
“While the right attitudes are important, these will rarely be adequate in themselves. We also
need to develop certain skills if we are to be effective peacemakers.”140
1. Truthful speech. “Peacemakers are called to learn to communicate truthfully but lovingly,
passionately but humbly.”141
2. Attentive listening. “People in conflict care passionately about things, and they want to be
heard….We will seek to discern the core meaning of what the other person is trying to
communicate, and we will avoid getting hooked by the barbs…the other may include.”142
3. Alertness to community. “Peacemakers learn in community about the complex
interweaving of human experience. Peacemakers are aware of the importance of differing
generations.”143 “We learn through apprenticeship to masters who have learned God’s
story of peacemaking and lived it out.”144 “[P]eacemakers must remember that the
shalom of a community will depend on its willingness to face economic questions.”145
4. Community discernment and mutual accountability. “Individuals need the moral
discernment that takes place within the believing community.”146 “Our decision to join
the church is essentially a declaration that we are willing to be held accountable by our
140Ibid.,80.141Ibid.142Ibid.,81.143Ibid.,86.144Ibid.,87.145Ibid.,88.146Ibid.,90.
Boyd 65
fellow-believers in our Christian walk.”147
147Ibid.,91.
Boyd 66
Bibliography
Alexis-Baker, Andy. “Just Policing: A New Face to an Old Challenge.” In Peace Be With You: Christ's Benediction Amid Violent Empires, edited by Sharon L. Baker and Michael Hardin, 80-99. Telford, PA: Cascadia Publishing, 2010.
Assefa, Hizkias. Mediation of Civil Wars: Approaches and Strategies--The Sudan Conflict. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1987.
Bainton, Roland H. Christian Attitudes toward War and Peace: A Historical Survey and Critical Re-evaluation. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press, 1960.
Bøås, Morten. “The Liberian Civil War: New War/Old War?.” Global Society: Journal of Interdisciplinary International Relations 19, no. 1 (January 2005): 73-88.
Brewer, John D. “Northern Ireland: Peacemaking among Protestants and Catholics.” In Artisans of Peace: Grassroots Peacemaking among Christian Communities, edited by Mary Ann Cejka and Thomas Bamat, 67-95. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 2003.
Brown, Tricia Gates, ed. Getting in the Way: Stories from Christian Peacemaker Teams. Scottdale, PA: Herald Press, 2005.
Duany, Julia Aker. “South Sudan: People-to-People Peacemaking: A Local Solution to Local Problems.” In Artisans of Peace: Grassroots Peacemaking among Christian Communities, edited by Mary Ann Cejka and Thomas Bamat, 196-225. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 2003.
Esquivia, Ricardo, and Paul Stucky. “Building Peace from Below and Inside: The Mennonite Experience in Colombia.” In From the Ground Up: Mennonite Contributions to International Peacebuilding, edited by Cynthia Sampson and John Paul Lederach, 122-140. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Fischer, Louis, ed. The Essential Gandhi: An Anthology of His Writings on His Life, Work, and Ideas. Second. New York, NY: Vintage, 2002.
Frey, Mark. “Standing in the Gap.” In Getting in the Way: Stories from Christian Peacemaker Teams, edited by Tricia Gates Brown, 69-77. Scottdale, PA: Herald Press, 2005.
Johnston, Douglas, and Brian Cox. “Faith-Based Diplomacy and Preventive Engagement.” In Faith-Based Diplomacy: Trumping Realpolitik, edited by Douglas Johnston, 11-29. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2003.
“Kennedy Peace Prize Goes to Leymah Gbowee of Liberia.” New York Amsterdam News. New York, NY, May 21, 2009.
Kreider, Alan, Eleanor Kreider, and Paulus Widjaja. A Culture of Peace: God's Vision for the Church. Intercourse, PA: Good Books, 2005.
Lederach, John Paul. Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press, 1997.
———. The Little Book of Conflict Transformation. Intercourse, PA: Good Books, 2003. Lederach, John Paul, and R. Scott Appleby. “Strategic Peacebuilding: An Overview.” In
Strategies of Peace: Transforming Conflict in a Violent World, edited by Daniel Philpott and Gerard F. Powers, 19-44. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Lederach, John Paul, Reina Neufeldt, and Hal Culbertson. Reflective Peacebuilding: A Planning, Monitoring, and Learning Toolkit. Notre Dame, IN: The Joan B. Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies, University of Notre Dame and Catholic Relief Services Southeast, East Asia Regional Office, 2007.
Boyd 67
Little, David, ed. Peacemakers in Action: Profiles of Religion in Conflict Resolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Little, David, and Scott Appleby. “A Moment of Opportunity? The Promise of Religious Peacebuilding in an Era of Religious and Ethnic Conflict.” In Religion and Peacebuilding, edited by Harold Coward and Gordon S. Smith, 1-23. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2004.
Matthew, Leahy. Old Radicals. Online, Documentary, 2010. http://www.docchallenge.org/2010-Finalists/old-radicals.html.
Moran, Mary H., and M. Anne Pitcher. “The ‘Basket Case’ and the ‘Poster Child’: Explaining the End of Civil Conflicts in Liberia and Mozambique.” Third World Quarterly 25, no. 3 (2004): 501-519.
Musundi, Nora. “Caring for Victims in Kenya.” In Seeking Peace in Africa: Stories from African Peacemakers, edited by Donald E. Miller, Scott Holland, Lon Fendall, and Dean Johnson, 142-147. Telford, PA: Cascadia Publishing, 2007.
Nakuwundi, Philippe. “Healing in Burundi.” In Seeking Peace in Africa: Stories from African Peacemakers, edited by Donald E. Miller, Scott Holland, Lon Fendall, and Dean Johnson, 124-127. Telford, PA: Cascadia Publishing, 2007.
Payne, William. “People of Faith Occupy a Military Base.” In Getting in the Way: Stories from Christian Peacemaker Teams, edited by Tricia Gates Brown, 113-123. Scottdale, PA: Herald Press, 2005.
Petrou, Steve. Peacemakers in the Holy Land. Online, Documentary, 2006. http://www.veoh.com/collection/PeppersprayProductionsindymediaPres/watch/v5765287yMfR2be.
Powers, Gerard F. “Religion and Peacebuilding.” In Strategies of Peace: Transforming Conflict in a Violent World, edited by Daniel Philpott and Gerard F. Powers, 317-352. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Reticker, Gini. Pray the Devil Back to Hell. Documentary. Fork Films, 2008. Robb, John D., and James A. Hill. The Peacemaking Power of Prayer: Equipping Christians to
Transform the World. Nashville, TN: Broadman and Holman Publishers, 2000. Roe, Dianne. “Witnessing Demolition, Fasting for Rebuilding.” In Getting in the Way: Stories
from Christian Peacemaker Teams, edited by Tricia Gates Brown, 79-87. Scottdale, PA: Herald Press, 2005.
Rogers, Mark M., Tom Bamat, and Julie Ideh, eds. Pursuing Just Peace: An Overview and Case Studies for Faith-Based Peacebuilders. Baltimore, MD: Catholic Relief Services, 2008.
Schlabach, Gerald, ed. Just Policing, Not War: An Alternative Response to World Violence. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 2007.
Stassen, Glen H., ed. Just Peacemaking: The New Paradigm for the Ethics of Peace and War. 2nd ed. Cleveland, OH: Pilgrim Press, 2008.
Steele, David. “An Introductory Overview to Faith-Based Peacebuilding.” In Pursuing Just Peace: An Overview and Case Studies for Faith-Based Peacebuilders, edited by Mark M. Rogers, Tom Bamat, and Julie Ideh. Baltimore, MD: Catholic Relief Services, 2008.
Walzer, Michael. Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Basic Books, 1977.
Wijesinghe, Shirley Lal. “Sri Lanka: Prophetic Initiatives amidst Deadly Conflict.” In Artisans of Peace: Grassroots Peacemaking among Christian Communities, edited by Mary Ann Cejka and Thomas Bamat, 166-195. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 2003.
Boyd 68
Wink, Walter. Engaging the Powers: Discernment and Resistance in a World of Domination. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1992.
Yoder, John Howard. Christian Attitudes to War, Peace, and Revolution. Edited by Theodore J. Koontz and Andy Alexis-Baker. Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos Press, 2009.