Chinese Regulation of Foreign Business - 2010 James V. Feinerman James M. Morita Professor of Asian...

22
Chinese Regulation of Foreign Business - 2010 James V. Feinerman James M. Morita Professor of Asian Legal Studies Georgetown University Law Center
  • date post

    19-Dec-2015
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    216
  • download

    0

Transcript of Chinese Regulation of Foreign Business - 2010 James V. Feinerman James M. Morita Professor of Asian...

Page 1: Chinese Regulation of Foreign Business - 2010 James V. Feinerman James M. Morita Professor of Asian Legal Studies Georgetown University Law Center.

Chinese Regulation of Foreign Business - 2010

James V. Feinerman

James M. Morita Professor of Asian Legal Studies

Georgetown University Law Center

Page 2: Chinese Regulation of Foreign Business - 2010 James V. Feinerman James M. Morita Professor of Asian Legal Studies Georgetown University Law Center.

Introduction

Foreign Trade Foreign Investment in China Chinese Investment Abroad Customs Commodity Inspection Taxation Civil & criminal law Technical standards of different countries International Practices & Treaties

Page 3: Chinese Regulation of Foreign Business - 2010 James V. Feinerman James M. Morita Professor of Asian Legal Studies Georgetown University Law Center.

China: Basic Facts

2009 GDP: $$4.758 trillion (estimate) 2009 PPP-adjusted GDP: $8.767 trillion (3rd in the

World) Per-capita PPP-adjusted GDP: $6,500 (2009 est.)

(127th in the World) Average GDP Growth past decade: 10% Projected 5-year GDP Growth Average: 10%

(almost 3 x US!) Foreign Direct Investment: $576.1 billion

(December 2009 est.)

Page 4: Chinese Regulation of Foreign Business - 2010 James V. Feinerman James M. Morita Professor of Asian Legal Studies Georgetown University Law Center.

Selected 2008 FDI Recipients (Source: UNCTAD)

Worldwide $1.697 Trillion Africa $ 78 Billion Latin America $ 121 Billion Asia $ 297 Billion European Union $ 549 Billion NAFTA $ 361.1 Billion India $ 27.3 Billion Hong Kong $ 63 Billion China $ 92.4 Billion

Page 5: Chinese Regulation of Foreign Business - 2010 James V. Feinerman James M. Morita Professor of Asian Legal Studies Georgetown University Law Center.

Look Before You Leap

Market Access – Restrictions and Investment Vehicles Intellectual Property Protection Legal System/Dispute Resolution/Corruption Foreign Exchange/Taxation Guanxi 关系 = Connections Dealing with State-owned Enterprises Financial Transparency/Hidden Liabilities Employees and Employment Law Matters Land/Real Estate Corporate Governance and Corporate Culture Local v. National Isssues (local protectionism)

Page 6: Chinese Regulation of Foreign Business - 2010 James V. Feinerman James M. Morita Professor of Asian Legal Studies Georgetown University Law Center.

Brief History of Foreign Investment

Tight government control and “special treatment” of foreign investors moving towards loosening of control in the light of WTO agreements

1970s first foreign investment laws Foreign Invested Enterprises (FIEs) a distinct legal category More government control, but some special privileges

Late 90s and 00s: New M&A and FIE laws Provisional Measures on Domestic Investment by Foreign

Invested Enterprises (2000) Rules on Merger and Division of FIEs (1999, amended 2001) Investment Regulations Investment Catalog (2002 – new

updates)

Page 7: Chinese Regulation of Foreign Business - 2010 James V. Feinerman James M. Morita Professor of Asian Legal Studies Georgetown University Law Center.

Current Investment Framework (1)

Important Sectors of China’s Economy Initially (Some Remain) Closed to Foreign Investment

Pre-WTO Liberalization Increases Availability of Wholly Foreign-Owned Enterprises (WFOEs) vs. Joint Ventures (JVs)

Government Approval at Local, Provincial or National Level Required of all Investments

Level of Government Approval Depends on Amount, Location and Nature of Proposed Investment

Page 8: Chinese Regulation of Foreign Business - 2010 James V. Feinerman James M. Morita Professor of Asian Legal Studies Georgetown University Law Center.

Current Investment Framework (2)

Special Economic Zones (SEZs) Provide Additional Flexibility/Advantages, e.g., Shanghai Pudong Waigaoqiao)

Foreign Investment and Economic Development Concentrated on East Coast

Tax Advantages for Certain Foreign Invested Enterprises, but Regulations are Complex

RMB Still Not Fully Convertible (swap markets; now bank account convertible)

Page 9: Chinese Regulation of Foreign Business - 2010 James V. Feinerman James M. Morita Professor of Asian Legal Studies Georgetown University Law Center.

Market Access

Foreign Investment catalogue – 4 Categories Encouraged Restricted Prohibited Unlisted = Permitted

Business Scope Narrowly Defined WTO Concessions

Improve trade & foreign investment environment Open new service sectors to foreign investment Modify intellectual property rights and technology transfer

rules Reduce tariff and non-tariff barriers

Page 10: Chinese Regulation of Foreign Business - 2010 James V. Feinerman James M. Morita Professor of Asian Legal Studies Georgetown University Law Center.

New Foreign M&A Regulations

Percentage restrictions Mandatory asset appraisals set floor on purchase

price Protection of existing creditors/guaranty of payment Requirement for public notice Labor issues

“Employment settlement plans” approved by authorities Certain acquisitions must be approved by labor organizations

Purchase price Form of consideration flexible Payment within prescribed period after approvals

Page 11: Chinese Regulation of Foreign Business - 2010 James V. Feinerman James M. Morita Professor of Asian Legal Studies Georgetown University Law Center.

Growth Factors for M&A Investments

Fast growing number of qualified “target companies” Foreign investors’ increasing interest in existing

Chinese businesses instead of greenfield investments State-owned being privatized Chinese companies seeking international

financing/tech expertise Global capital markets looking for “China concept” Potential increase in China asset values as RMB is

revalued upward

Page 12: Chinese Regulation of Foreign Business - 2010 James V. Feinerman James M. Morita Professor of Asian Legal Studies Georgetown University Law Center.

Investment Vehicles

Representative office Equity joint venture (“EJV”) Cooperative joint venture (“CJV”) Wholly foreign-owned enterprise (“WFOE”) Limited Liability Company Joint Stock Company Other forms (e.g., Holding Company, Branch

Office, Limited Partnership, Processing/Contractual Arrangements)

Page 13: Chinese Regulation of Foreign Business - 2010 James V. Feinerman James M. Morita Professor of Asian Legal Studies Georgetown University Law Center.

Selecting the Chinese Partner

While foreign companies are increasingly likely to establish wholly foreign-owned enterprises in the PRC, most still seek a Chinese co-venturer. Typical reasons include:

Chinese policy discourages or prohibits wholly foreign-owned investment in the sector in question;

The Chinese partner holds a dominant market position, which the proposed joint venture will inherit;

The Chinese partner has a distribution network, assets, relationships or other advantages that will permit the joint venture access to markets, raw materials or quotas.

Page 14: Chinese Regulation of Foreign Business - 2010 James V. Feinerman James M. Morita Professor of Asian Legal Studies Georgetown University Law Center.

Due Diligence: Overview

Investor’s first line of protection – thorough business and legal due diligence

Experienced international businesspeople appear to ignore the basic tent when investing in China

Professional due diligence in China presents peculiar challenges: Less reliable information than foreign investors are used to Obscure and volatile state of China’s legal system Chinese companies’ lack of familiarity (and patience!) with

corporate formalities and record keeping Great breadth of authority afforded China’s bureaucracy

Page 15: Chinese Regulation of Foreign Business - 2010 James V. Feinerman James M. Morita Professor of Asian Legal Studies Georgetown University Law Center.

Due Diligence: Key Points

Nature and Powers of the PartnerFinancial Records (all sets of books)EmployeesContractual obligationsTaxOwnership – and division – of Assets

Page 16: Chinese Regulation of Foreign Business - 2010 James V. Feinerman James M. Morita Professor of Asian Legal Studies Georgetown University Law Center.

Transition Issues for Transfers of Existing Facilities into Joint Ventures

If existing plant of facilities will become part of the JV: Mechanics and details of this transfer Appendix listing all of the Chinese partner’s assets and liabilities

that are to be transferred to the new entity Land use rights, buildings and other fixed assets

“allocated” or “granted” state-owned land use rights Allocated land is transferred to the use for free (annual land use tax) User has no rights to transfer; state may recover the land at any time

without paying compensation For granted land, the used pays the state a land grant premium for

the right to use it for a stated period of years Granted land use rights are transferable (including by mortgage and

lease) and may not be abrogated by the state (except for compensation in the exercise of its right of eminent domain)

Inventory, receivables, intangibles and contractual rights

Page 17: Chinese Regulation of Foreign Business - 2010 James V. Feinerman James M. Morita Professor of Asian Legal Studies Georgetown University Law Center.

Valuation Issues – Cash and In-kind

Relative value of parties’ contributions determines share of profits Value of non-cash contributions is usually a hotly negotiated issue

(Chinese contributions usually in-kind; foreign usually cash or combination)

Value of non-cash contributions must be set forth in the capital contribution section of the JV contract

Non-cash contributions by foreign parties must also be valued by the State Import and Export Commodities Inspection Administration

Actual contribution of both cash and non-cash inputs must be verified by a licensed PRC accounting firm

State-owned assets (such as assets owned by state enterprises) must be valued by a valuation firm licensed by the State Assets Management Bureau

Localities have standards to value land use rights; foreign investors should investigate whether Chinese side’s valuation falls within the official range

Investors should bear in mind that the official guidelines assume granted land use rights rather than allocated land use rights

Page 18: Chinese Regulation of Foreign Business - 2010 James V. Feinerman James M. Morita Professor of Asian Legal Studies Georgetown University Law Center.

Other Issues Registered Capital

Minimum of 1/3 total capital; cannot be reduced Conditions to the Effectiveness of JVs

Transfer of property Contribution of assets Necessary approvals

Feasibility Studies – Prior Approval Mandatory Objectives, sources of investment, sources of foreign exchange and raw

materials, site, technology requirements Economic benefit analysis, financial projections Labor requirements Marketing plans, distribution, export percentages, forex balancing

Non-competition clauses Geographic Product line(s) Marketing plans, distribution

Chinese Law Opinion Letters

Page 19: Chinese Regulation of Foreign Business - 2010 James V. Feinerman James M. Morita Professor of Asian Legal Studies Georgetown University Law Center.

Off-shore Holding Structures

Most foreign investors prefer to conduct their Chinese investments through a series of offshore, single purpose, limited liability companies:

Permits investors to limit China project liability to one offshore entity

Facilitates future transfers of the investment Where there are multiple foreign investors in a JV,

foreign parties may work out the details of their cooperation in a shareholders’ agreement

Chinese JV law does not provide for more complex corporate capital structures, such as preferred stock, redemption rights, or the like

Page 20: Chinese Regulation of Foreign Business - 2010 James V. Feinerman James M. Morita Professor of Asian Legal Studies Georgetown University Law Center.

Exit Strategies

Most investors in China are strategic investors – manufacturing firms wishing to establish long-term production facilities to service China and Asian regional markets

They typically are not greatly concerned about the mechanics or financial consequences of disposing of their investments

Growing group of financial/portfolio investors in China Investment funds Merchant banks Other financial institutions

These investors are keenly interested in strategies for tax-efficient exit from their investments within a set time horizon

Page 21: Chinese Regulation of Foreign Business - 2010 James V. Feinerman James M. Morita Professor of Asian Legal Studies Georgetown University Law Center.

Intellectual Property

IP Rights Violations Remain a Serious Threat IP violations are widespread in China

Infringing/counterfeiting (20%+ of all consumer products) Piracy (90%+ of movies, software, games, books) Imitation of product designs IP theft by employees/partners

In the US, Canada, Japan and EU, China is the No. 1 source of seizures of infringing goods

Chinese government entities may acquiesce in infringing/counterfeiting activities Local governments (sole source of revenue and salaries for

local courts and judges) protect local taxpayers and employers

National government determined to advanced China’s technological progress by whatever means

Page 22: Chinese Regulation of Foreign Business - 2010 James V. Feinerman James M. Morita Professor of Asian Legal Studies Georgetown University Law Center.

Intellectual Property – Conclusions

China’s IP Laws “closing in” on international standards IP enforcement in China – still a “work in progress” Foreign companies should file and protect IP in China

Patents Trademarks and copyrights Non-compete and confidentiality agreements

Foreign IP owners can successfully enforce IP rights in China Don’t be reluctant to sue in China Don’t wait too long – two-year statute of limitations Choose counsel carefully