Childhood obesity in Europe: implications for the future food chain - Philip James
-
Upload
barilla-center-for-food-nutrition -
Category
Education
-
view
2.153 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Childhood obesity in Europe: implications for the future food chain - Philip James
PHILIP JAMES
Chairman, International Obesity Task Force
CHILDHOOD OBESITY IN EUROPE: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE FUTURE FOOD CHAIN
10
17
18
31
36
2219
18
27 15
16
18
33 2735
34
26
12
17
33
34
9
21
20
1717
22
23
25
89
17
13
1212
1811
Overweight (%)Equivalent to BMI>25
14-17 years
7-11 years
European national prevalences (%) of overweight and obesity in children aged 7-11yrs using IOTF cut-off points
Norway
Poland†Netherlands
SlovakiaBulgaria
SloveniaSweden*
Spain
ItalyCzech Rep
Ireland (Rep)
Denmark
France
Switzerland
Germany
England
Cyprus
Greece*
Portugal†
† 7-9yrs * 6-11yrs © International Association for the Study of Obesity Sept 2010
% Overweight and Obesity in children aged 7-11 years (using IOTF cut off)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Portugal* *
Greece*
Czech Republic
Italy
Cyprus
Ireland (Republic of)
Spain
England
Sweden*
Slovenia
Germany
Bulgaria
Slovakia
Switzerland
Netherlands
Poland* *
France
Norway
Denmark
Obese
Overweight
5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Obese
Overweight
Children’sOverweight +Obesity
Lobstein T.OECD.Sept 25th2010
Genetics influence susceptibility to prevailing dietary and activity environment
Overweight & Obesity in Children around the Globe (Based on IOTF cut off points)
05
10
152025303540
NorthAmerica
LatinAmerica
Eastern Med Europe WestPacific
South EastAsia
Africa
Region
%
Overweight
Obesity
Rachel Leach, IOTF, April 28th 2008
The natural history of childhood overweight/obesity using IOTF cut-offs in Australia over the last century and regional global increases
Wang and Lobstein, IOTF, Int J Ped Ob 2006.
20001980196019401920190019000
10
20
30
40
Year
% o
verw
eig
ht
+ o
bese
Raw data
All data
e.g. Japan
e.g. India
%%
e.g. US
e.g. S.Arabiae.g. UK
Global total now: obese 74 mil. +overwt. 287 mil.Global total now: obese 74 mil. +overwt. 287 mil.Global total now: obese 74 mil. +overwt. 287 mil.Global total now: obese 74 mil. +overwt. 287 mil.
Norton K et al, Int J Ped Ob 2006
Australia
Economic development and falling food needsEconomic development and falling food needs
3000
2000
1000
Kcals
Car Use
Mechanical aids
TVComputers
Energy needs
US Intakes
UK Intakes Increasing obesity
Economic development and ageing
? Japan
Sarah Hinde: The car-reliant environment. In: The 7 deadly sins of obesity. Univ. of NSW, Australia. 2007.
CAR-RELIANCE limits child development
Increase in traffic
Parent concern for child safety
Sedentary replaces active transport
Parents chauffeur children
Organised sport replaces play for
children
PHYSICAL INACTIVITY
The Traditional Mediterranean Diet
Corfu & Crete1960-65 Men (7
country) g/d
S. Italy1930s Household
(CNR) per caput g/d
EURATOM1960s Household
g/d/consumption unit
S. Italy1960-65 Men (7
country) g/d
0
250
500
750
1000
1250
1500
Fish
Fruit
Vegetables
CerealsFats & oils
Milk
Meat
Eggs
Alcohol
Sugars etc.
Grams
Compiled by Anna Ferro-Luzzi Institute of Nutrition Rome
The keys to success in the food business and in obesity and chronic disease prevention
• Marketing
• Availability
• Price
A quarter-pound cheeseburger, large fries and a 16 oz. soda provide:
1,166 calories 51 g fat 95 mg
cholesterol 1,450 mg
sodium
“Obesity is a commercial success. Promotional budgets and advertising markets for energy-dense nutrient-poor (junk) food and drinks hugely outweigh those for healthy food. Similarly, the budgets for inactive transport and entertainment (video games, internet, TV) morbidly outweigh those for active transport and active entertainment”Australian Prev.HlthTaskforce,Oct,2008
- Car washes- Book stores- Hardware stores (Home Depot)- Gas stations- Office buildings (vending machines)- Health clubs/gyms- Video stores- Car repair shops
Snack Foods Are Everywhere
CHIPS ARE IN SEASON!
Doubling shelf space increases sales by 40%Doubling shelf space increases sales by 40%
Gary Lineker
= potato crisps
David Beckham
= soft drinks
Marketing : celebrities and sports
OBESITY
Dietary changeDietary change
Folate, B 6 Homocysteinaemia ? Thrombosis
Saturated fats AtherosclerosisAntioxidants
Total Fat
High energy density *_ by fat & refined CHOs
Physical inactivityPhysical inactivity
DIABETES
CORONARY HEART
DISEASE & STROKE
HYPERTENSION
++
+ + +
+
+
+ +
++
*Energy density reduced by water -holding, bulky foods, e.g. tubers, cereals, vegetables, fruits, pulses.
Vegetables, fruits, pulses
SALT+
Trans Fats
N-3/N-6 fats
+
+
CANCERS
Who controls the food chain ?
Corinna Hawkes, 2006
Local markets, Local markets, roadside stalls roadside stalls and farm shopsand farm shops
Supermarkets: the "food consuming industry"
Small Small food food
outletsoutlets
Global Feed CompaniesGlobal Feed Companies
Global Food Companies
FFaarrmmeerrs s
Family and other Family and other small food companiessmall food companies P
UBLIC
The current obesity dilemma
UK Government report Oct. 2007
Obesity is a normal "passive" biological response to our changed physical and food environment
Some children/adults are more susceptible for genetic, social and economic reasons
Overwhelming environmental impact reflects outcome of normal industrial development
Obesity reflects failure of the free market
Sept.25th 2010
Why the obesity pandemic? An OECD 2010 perspective
• “ The mass production of food over time has changed both the quality and availability of food
• Falling relative food prices contributed up to 40% of the increase in BMI in the US 1976-1994….
• Convenience also played a major role, in combination with falling prices, with the spread and concentration of fast food restaurants…..
• The use of increasingly sophisticated marketing techniques is naturally associated with an increase in the supply of food….
• These effects are consistent with the patterns observed in the distribution of obesity among population groups, with more vulnerable individuals and families and those whose time available for meal preparation and cooking has become more limited being more exposed to the influence of supply-side changes.”
e.g. Any focus on Health Education selectively helps upper socio-economic groups. But need understandable food labelling; Drs have major role in identifying susceptible adults to avoid
diabetes
Individual responsibility
Changes to the "toxic" environment
Adapted from Puska P, 2001
Progressively adapt all towns/cities to favour pedestrian/cycling as norm with car restrictions
Nutritional standards for food in all government facilities/schools; eliminate trans fats; catering on Finnish scale: fruit + veg. within meal costs
Limit/abolish all marketing to children
Selectively increase costs of high fat/sugary products; soft drinks
Social/employment/medical policies for breast feeding as the norm/new nursery standards
Complementary Complementary approaches to obesity & approaches to obesity & chronic disease chronic disease preventionprevention
Complementary Complementary approaches to obesity & approaches to obesity & chronic disease chronic disease preventionprevention
US Adults Global Children
De Onis et al.Amer J Clin Nut.2010;92:: 1257-1264
Ogden et al .CDC posters 2010
Fiscal
Phys/Dieticiancounselling
Mass media
Work site
School
Food labelling
Regulation
Food advertising
Self Regulation
Physcn.Cnslng
OECD/WHO modelling
Major initiatives in France are reversing the obesity epidemic in children
• 64 Regions• Children aged 7-9yrs• IOTF cut-off points
• Prevalence s• 2000: 18.1% O/W 3.8% Obese• 82007: 15.5% O/W 2.% Obese
Data presented by the Ministry of health at the International Congress of Nutrition ,Bangkok. October 2009
Healthy Weight, Healthy Lives. Two Years on. UK March 10 th 2010
INFLUENCEINFLUENCE
-10
-- 5
0
510
INT
ER
ES
TIN
TE
RE
ST
Children
Health professionals
Advocacy orgs.
Scientists
Parents Ministry of Health
Parliament
Farmers
Media
Church
Ministries of Transport
& Agriculture
Retailers
Treasury
President
Advertising industry
Food/drink industry
Food inspectors
Ministry of Education
Teachers
0 5 10
Ministry of Trade
Lobstein T : Analyses based on The Food Commission's experience and new EU policy work.
?
5
0
-- 100 5 10
The interest and influences of different stakeholders