ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.

45
Taichung Wufeng Takeng Fengyuan Shihkang Tungshih SunMoon L. ChiChi Nantou Tsaotun Luku Chusan Mingchien Shuili Taiping epicenter 20km Taichung Wufeng Takeng Fengyuan Shihkang Tungshih SunMoon L. ChiChi Nantou Tsaotun Luku Chusan Mingchien Shuili Taiping epicenter 20km Taichung Wufeng Takeng Fengyuan Shihkang Tungshih SunMoon L. ChiChi Nantou Tsaotun Luku Chusan Mingchien Shuili Taiping epicenter 20km ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999
  • date post

    21-Dec-2015
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    216
  • download

    0

Transcript of ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.

Page 1: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.

Taichung

Wufeng

Takeng

Fengyuan ShihkangTungshih

SunMoon L.

ChiChi

Nantou

Tsaotun

LukuChusan

MingchienShuili

Taiping

epicenter

20 km

Taichung

Wufeng

Takeng

Fengyuan ShihkangTungshih

SunMoon L.

ChiChi

Nantou

Tsaotun

LukuChusan

MingchienShuili

Taiping

epicenter

20 km

Taichung

Wufeng

Takeng

Fengyuan ShihkangTungshih

SunMoon L.

ChiChi

Nantou

Tsaotun

LukuChusan

MingchienShuili

Taiping

epicenter

20 km

ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999

Page 2: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.

121°E10 km

1

2

3 km

121°30"E

50 km

Chelungpu Fault

1999 hypocenter

Propagation@3 km/sec.Slip velocity less

Page 3: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.

Building Damage

• wrong design

• wrong construction

• wrong location

• engineer

• contractor

• geologist

Page 4: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.

Wrong Engineering• Ground floor too weak

• Building not symmetrical

• Too close to next building

• Foundations not deep enough

• Accelerations too large (inappropriate seismology and geology input)

Conclusion: Taiwanese Engineering is Exceptionally good. 95% success. Most buildings held!

Page 5: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.

Construction problems in concrete structures

• Weak cement (should be strong)

• Brittle steel (should be ductile)

• Insufficient stirrups in columns

• Wrong positioning of steel

• Weak wall/column bonding

Page 6: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.
Page 7: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.
Page 8: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.
Page 9: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.
Page 10: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.
Page 11: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.
Page 12: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.
Page 13: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.
Page 14: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.

Geology & seismology

• Where are the faults?

• How often do they move?

• Liquefaction?

• Basin Resonance?

• Accelerations near fault? (Brune ripple)

• Focussing effects? (Heaton pulse)

Important effects in the 1999 Chichi Earthquake

Page 15: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.

Lateral spreadingLiquefaction in Wufeng

Page 16: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.

Liquefaction-induced sand-venting through lateral spreading fissures

Page 17: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.

Ground fissuringMSK VIII-IX

Lateral spreading andFoundation settlement

Channel fracturing& collapse

Page 18: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.

QuickTime™ and aCinepak decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Accelerations near the surface rupture

2.5 km/sec

Bruneripple

Page 19: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.

Toe collapse and hanging wall accelerations

How fast did the fault slip near the surface?How did toe of thrust deform?

Page 20: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.
Page 21: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.
Page 22: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.
Page 23: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.
Page 24: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.
Page 25: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.
Page 26: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.
Page 27: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.

Footwall

Hanging Wall

Collapsed toe of thrust

Masonry posts still standing=Intensity VII (<0.4 g)

rolled but not thrown

Page 28: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.

Minor to moderatedamage (MSKIntensity VIII)

Page 29: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.

Masonry wall collapse Masonry pillar“shaken not stirred!”

Toe

footwall

MSK Intensity VIII

Page 30: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.

curboffset5.6 m

C.enlarged view ofChungKuan lane

fault strikeN15°E

N60°E

curb

curbfootwall

hangingwallup 3.3 m

Takeng River

B≈4 m

C=3.3 m

D =3.5 m

A≈4 m

Chelungpu F.

footwall down hanging wall up

Hm

Hn

Hw

1 km

Page 31: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.

X9X7

X28

T30

T7

T25

T92

T120

T50

T50XXX120 t8

t7

t13

t5

V30

V20

T370

T40B

Wufeng

X130

V30

pre-seismic

post-seismic

pre-seismic

post-seismic

C

DA

X11

Chelungpu F.

R10°

R15°

R20°

R15°T45 t15 t13

X17T10

V5

t20

T60

T30T20

t7

t10

t7

X133figure 6

xx

Page 32: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.

Conclusions on thrust emplacement

1. Slip was relatively slow (velocities 1-2 m/sec)2. Accelerations were less than 0.5 g on the toe of the thrust

Brune ripple apparently not applicable to thrust faults in western Taiwan

Page 33: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.

throw

pre-seismic

co-seismic

post-seismic

toe

heave

dip simple shear

collapseaxis

hangingwall rotation

collapseaxis

scarp

collapse ofhanging wall

Page 34: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.

inverted, unbroken tile

preseismic

co-seismic

post-seismic

30 cm tile liftedand rotated 180°

Pagoda

un-reinforcedconcretestairway

tileslargelyintact

contact

hillside steepenedflexedand shortened

A B

Page 35: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.
Page 36: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.
Page 37: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.
Page 38: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.
Page 39: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.
Page 40: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.
Page 41: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.
Page 42: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.

2.5 m localizedthrusting

1.5 m distributedshortening & rotation

thrust-parallel tension gashes

prograde rotationof hillside treesand stairways

local southwarddirected thrustingover unconfinedsouthern slope

20°

≈0.3 msurficialshortening

80 m

150 m

10°

Pagoda 1

Shrine

Figure 8

50-m-WIDE ZONE OF ROTATION & SHORTENING

Page 43: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.

Conclusions

• Structures must not be built on faults• Width of zone damage zone 50 m on

hanging wall near bedrock• Width of severe damage 1 km in sediments

Observation:Many schools and bridges built near or across faults!

Page 44: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.

recommendations

• Need better acceleration data from fault zones (make fault zones parks)

• Instrument and map thrust faults to north

• Need to ensure that contractors understand the need for tied stirrups, and correct density. in concrete columns.

• Need to avoid regions of known liquefaction (make fissured zones into parks)

Page 45: ChiChi Earthquake, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Propagation @3 km/sec. Slip velocity less.

High tech. reccommendation

• Inexpensive accelerometers could be included in every new building in Taiwan as a “Black Box” recorder like those used in aircraft.

• Cost could be less than $100 given Taiwanese ingenuity and experience!

• This would make contractors realize that they will have to answer for bad construction practices!