CHICAGO’S CENTRAL AREA PLAN 2020onlinepubs.trb.org/.../conferences/SG/Hamilton_Mon9_PM.pdfLines...
36
Prepared by: City of Chicago Department of Planning and Development Department of Transportation Department of the Environment Skidmore, Owings and Merrill LLP Arthur Andersen LLP Goodman Williams Group The Lambert Group Zoning Reform: Duncan Associates Dyett & Bhatia CHICAGO’S CENTRAL AREA PLAN 2020
Transcript of CHICAGO’S CENTRAL AREA PLAN 2020onlinepubs.trb.org/.../conferences/SG/Hamilton_Mon9_PM.pdfLines...
Prepared by:
City of ChicagoDepartment of Planning and DevelopmentDepartment of TransportationDepartment of the Environment
Skidmore, Owings and Merrill LLPArthur Andersen LLPGoodman Williams GroupThe Lambert Group
Zoning Reform:Duncan AssociatesDyett & Bhatia
CHICAGO’S CENTRAL AREA PLAN 2020
Regionaltransitnetworkfocuseson Central
Area
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
" ""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
" ""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!( !(
!( !(
!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!( !( !( !(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!( !( !(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!( !( !(
!(
!(
!( !(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!( !(!(!(
!(!( !(
!(
!(!(!(!( !(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
W alkableStreets
Downtown
• Short blocks
• W ide sidewalks
• Buildings atproperty line
• Streetscaping
New andgrowingresidentialareas
surrounddowntown
Near North
River NorthNear Northw est
River North
Southw est Loop
Pilsen
Chinatown
M cCorm ick Place
Central Station
Lakeshore East
Northw estern
Gold Coast
University Village South Loop
Near South Neighborhoods
Near W est Side
• The Central Area’spopulationincreased 56%between 1980 and2000, to 83,000
• 23,000 net increasein housing units
Central Arearesidents
can cycle orwalk to work
Sidewalkswere
narrowed toaccom m odatem ore cars
CENTRALAREA PLANBOUNDARIES
DIVISION
HA
LS
TE
D
CHICAG O
STEVENSO N
WE
LLS
Suburbanoffice spacegrew at a
faster rate inthe 1990’s
Blank wallsdiscouragepedestrianactivity
Downtowntraffic
congestionincreased
CENTRAL AREA PLAN
• Econom ic Appraisal
• Organization:
– Guiding Them es
– Policies
– Recom m endations for publicand private im provem ents
The Guiding Them esof the Central Area Plan
• Ensure a dynam ic Central Area m adeup of vibrant and diverse m ixed useurban districts
• Ensure the Central Area rem ainsaccessible and connected
• Reinforce the Central Area’s focus onits waterfronts and open spaces
A CENTRAL AREA THAT ISACCESSIBLE AND CONNECTED
• M ake transit the first choice for people com ing to andm oving around the Central Area
• Expand and upgrade the transit system to providehigher quality service from outlying areas to andwithin the Central Area
• Dim inish auto congestion and future traffic andparking dem ands
• Create high quality landscaped streets and highways
• Reduce barriers faced by pedestrians and people withlim ited m obility
Them e
2
Factors for Choosing aDowntown Location
• Proxim ity to m ass transportation was the factor that had the strongestinfluence on the decision to locate downtown (73% )– According to the survey, 72% of em ployees take CTA or M etra to the workplace
– 23% drive
– 6% walk
• O ther influential factors were proxim ity to clients (46% ) and state-of-the-art technology infrastructure (43% )
• 79% indicated that is is neither an advantage nor disadvantage to belocated directly adjacent to residential developm ent
• Nearly one third of com panies interviewed indicated that an “urbanresidential lifestyle” was a factor in the decision to locate downtown
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
����������
1980 1985 1990 1995 2001 2006 2011 2016 20210
30
60
90
120
150
Central Area Office Space Growth
The Challenge - High Em ploym ent Growth Year 2020
Downtown Em ploym ent Increase +188,000 to 272,000
Downtown W ork Trip Increase +165,000 to 239,000
Transit Share of New Trips 70%
W ork Transit Trip Increase +116,000 to 167,000
AUTO
2001 2006 2011 2016 20210
100
200
300
400
500Central Area Transit & Auto Growth
AUTO
(125M ft2) (133M ft2) (141M ft2)(109M ft2) (117M ft2)
Year (CBD office space)BASE FORECAST
TRANSIT
Existing Level of Service Across All ScreenLines Existing Conditions, 1998
2020 Projected Level of Service Across All ScreenLines Base Scenario 1.6
W ith Added Parking No Added Loop Parking
Directing growth to the historic center ofthe region will:
• Lim it sprawl at the regional fringe
• Protect regional open space
• Enable the greatest num ber of people tocom m ute on transit
• M axim ize the value of existinginfrastructure
• Im prove regional environm ental quality
20 Year Transportation Plan
2002 - 2021
Plan Recom m endation:Transit Oriented Developm ent
Congress
Randolph
Roosevelt
18th
Cerm ak
O hio , Ontario, Grand
Chicago
Hal
sted
Can
al Wel
ls - W
entw
ort
hCongress
Randolph
Roosevelt
18thCerm ak
O hio , Ontario, Grand
Hal
sted
Can
al
Wel
ls - W
entw
ort
h
•Office and retaildevelopm ent near transitstations
•High density corridorsalong transit lines
•Include transit stations inbuildings
•Reduce parkingrequirem ents fordevelopm ent near transit
Extend the high density office coreinto the W est Loop
CONCEPTUAL
FARs
16+
12+
7+
7-
5+
5-
3-
7 7+
16+
12+
5+
5
3
7
16+
12+
5
3
EXISTING
3
Plan Recom m endation:Roadways
• Revisit On-Street Loadingand Parking Policies
• Im prove Traffic Flow via aTraffic M anagem ent Center
• Com plete the Street/BridgeGrid
DRIVEW AY ACCESS
(Zoning Reform )
Prohibited
Essential Access Only
Restricted/Conditional
Perm itted
Note: Driveways m ust com ply withapplicable design and traffic m anagem entstandards
CENTRAL AREA PARKINGDISTRICT
(Zoning Reform )
•Expand to include additional areas
•Create floor area allowance foraccessory parking
•Continue surface parking prohibition
Inner-Core (No non-accessory)
Central Area Parking District(Non-accessory by PD)
Expanded CAPD (Conceptual)
Plan Recom m endation: Transit
• Increase CTA and M etrarail and bus capacity intodowntown
• Provide im proved transitdistribution arounddowntown
• Im prove interm odalconnections including rail-to-rail and rail-to-bus
• Provide express railservice to the airports
Transit
Im provem ents
• Renovate and im prove
stations
• New stations along
existing lines
• Interm odal facilities
between com m uter rail,
rapid transit, and bus
Right of W ay Preservation for Future Corridors
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Concepts
• Exclusive Traffic Lanes
• Traffic Signal Priority
• Lim ited Stops
• Boarding AreaCanopies
• Real Tim e Bus ArrivalSigns
• Prepaid Boarding
• Streetscaping
• M etra Fare Integration
• W ide Doors/Bus FloorLevel Boarding
• High Capacity
POTENTIAL BUSRAPID TRANSIT(BRT) SYSTEM
W est Loop Transportation Center
Chicago’s Sm art Growth Plan
• Cluster new developm ent neartransportation
• Focus higher density office in theCentral and W est Loop
• Encourage residential North of Kinzie,W est of Halsted and South of Congress
• Regional policy needed to increasetransit use
Prepared by:
City of ChicagoDepartment of Planning and DevelopmentDepartment of TransportationDepartment of the Environment
Skidmore, Owings and Merrill LLPArthur Andersen LLPGoodman Williams GroupThe Lambert Group
Zoning Reform:Duncan AssociatesDyett & Bhatia
CHICAGO’S CENTRAL AREA PLAN 2020
