Chess.com

Comments

Sweaty palms and little beautyUseWithCare | Jan 26, 2015 at 2:48 AM | Posted in: NoGr’s Blog | 619 reads | 2 comments

When I added online chess to my list of long-term hobbies in earnest, believe it or not, I was

blissfully unaware of the term 'blitz chess' or 'bullet chess', or Chess 960. I've never met an

amateur like me playing regular chess OTB in a blitz manner.

It seems that Chess.com believes solving chess puzzles in a matter of seconds is the best way to

train. Now, if you solve chess puzzles according to a book or, say, on Lichess (which also provides

a useful tool for practicing openings), you can concentrate on the process a little longer.

Having played some 50 blitz and bullet games anonymously in a matter of two weeks on

Chessbase, with a moderate percentage of wins, I find it will take for me quite some time to

appreaciate the beauty of playing chess fast.

Here's an example of a game I played recently as White in a three-minute blitz, with time

controls at ca. 2:20 for both players (ca. 3 secs per move). It started out as Queen's Pawn, I

suppose but quickly got quite defensive in Black's pawn structure, perhaps due to the lack of

experience as a blitz player.

I can't yet see the ways one can possibly benefit from such wins, because it's obvious I won

because the opponent blundered in haste. Yes, there is a combination after the opponent

blundered with his Queen, too eager to exploit the open line, but is it quality chess? If I could

choose, I'd prefer to smother my opponent slowly, rather than quickly. Yes, playing blitz helps

find candidate moves faster but the percentage of errors and blunders must be impressive for all

players. Even GMs blunder in their first 40 moves.

What's your experience and attitude towards playing blitz? How has blitz helped you? When did

you start to feel more confident? Did it take a year or two? Has blitz chess also harmed you in any

way?

I'd be interested to hear from amateur players like me who think they first need to improve their

skills in regular chess.

Best wishes,

Normund

^ Ads keep Chess.com free. Upgrade to remove ads! ^

Most Recent Blogs

^ Ads keep Chess.com free. Upgrade to remove ads! ^

SearchSign Up - It's Free!Log In

PLAY LEARN SHARE FORUMS MORE

– X f J # , . @

1-0

1. d4 d5 2. Nc3 e6 3. Nf3c6 4. e3 Bd6 5. g3 f56. Bg2 Nf6 7. Qe2 Ne48. Nxe4 fxe4 9. Ne5 O-O10. O-O Qf6 11. f4 exf312. Rxf3 Qh6 13. e4 Qh514. Rxf8+

NoGrInternational

View complete profile

Search This Blog

Šaha mācību resursi: 1by UseWithCare 47 hours ago

Free Chess Training Resources: 1by UseWithCare 47 hours ago

Шахматные ресурсы: 1by UseWithCare 47 hours ago

Rauf Mamedov wins the European BlitzChampionshipby UseWithCare 12 days ago

Made in Latvia (Part 3)by UseWithCare 13 days ago

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

a b c d e f g h

Back to Top

Post your reply:

9 months agoStansteel

I'm a decent OTB player, but I'm terrible at bullet or blitz. Terrible. In a timed, OTB

tournament game, the value in being able to find the best move quickly is clear, and I

can see how bullet/blitz helps with that, but you simply can't blunder in regular games --

not like folks do in bullet and blitz. Each to their own, but to me bullet and blitz are as

different from correspondence as one-on-one basketball is different from 5-man play.

A few months before coming across this thread, I saw a thread discussing how folks with

a disparity of more than 200 rating points or so between correspondence and bullet or

blitz chess must be cheating. No other possible explanation. The arguments spiraled as

online banter does, until the implication was that those who can't make great moves in

seconds -- those who think for five, ten, maybe more minutes on some moves -- aren't

really chess players.

Some folks definitely have never tried to play bullet or blitz chess as one of two adults in

a house full of kids and dogs. One, average interruption = a loss. You can ramp up a -500

point disparity fast since a crying kid isn't likely to make you lose even a lightning fast,

one-move-per-day, correspondence game.

So, as it turns out, I find I simply don't have the time to play bullet or blitz. :)

11 months agotimeless-2

I personally share Fischer's feelings on blitz and bullet--it's "disposable chess" and can

ruin your OTB and correspondence chess game.

It's very fun to watch powerful players duke it out, but beyond that, I have not found

much use for playing it, when I don't have the time (often I will take a day or two to

contemplate moves in my most crucial games) to think at a relaxing, deeper level.

Chess is a game of conceptual and spatial thoughts, yet algorithmic. I think "speed

chess" decpreciates the true core of the game and erodes the allure and beauty of it,

overall.

I find that there is much more material value for improving game play in reading (I love

Silman's books), studying, post-mortem analysis, and repetitive tactical puzzle play

(especially to repeat the "failed" tactics puzzles over-and-over).

Now, finding the time for all of this...that's the true challenge. :)

Log In or Join

Home | Why Join | Chess Topics | About | FAQs | Help & Support | Site Map

Privacy Policy | Legal | © 2015 Chess.com • Chess - English