Chennai 6.2.10 j Jepal Yokogawa

download Chennai 6.2.10 j Jepal Yokogawa

of 25

Transcript of Chennai 6.2.10 j Jepal Yokogawa

  • 8/11/2019 Chennai 6.2.10 j Jepal Yokogawa

    1/25

    2010 Fieldbus Foundation

    2010 FFIC-Chennai Conference

    Jigish JepalExecutive Manager

    Yokogawa India LimitedE-mail ID : [email protected]

    Fieldbus Foundation India Committee

    Fieldbus FoundationFFIC + ISA Fieldbus Foundation Conference-2010

    Date : 6th February, 2010 ( Saturday)

    Time : from 09:00 am to 05:30 pm.

    Venue : IIT Convention Centre

    Gajendra Circle, IIT Campus,

    Adayar, Chennai.

    06-Feb-2010 1

  • 8/11/2019 Chennai 6.2.10 j Jepal Yokogawa

    2/25

    2010 Fieldbus Foundation

    2010 FFIC-Chennai Conference

    Importance of Device Capabilities for Achieving Desired

    Macro Cycle and Control Performance

    Typical Fieldbus Device

    Specifications

    Availability of function blocks ITK Compliance

    EDDL/FDT/DTM support /

    compliance

    Maximum current drawn

    Function block execution

    time (some times)

    Entity/FISCO/FNICO

    approval

    06-Feb-2010 2

    Un-specified specifications Availability of VCR

    Device operation parameters

  • 8/11/2019 Chennai 6.2.10 j Jepal Yokogawa

    3/25

    3

    2010 Fieldbus Foundation

    2010 FFIC-Chennai Conference

    Fieldbus Project Engineering Considerations

    Fieldbus Segment design considerations

    Segment design concepts (Entity, FISCO, FNICO, HPT)

    Power supply requirements

    Macro Cycle time

    Communication (Schedule and unscheduled communication times)

    Control philosophy (Control in Host system, Control in the field, Mix of control in Host

    system and in the field)

    06-Feb-2010 3

    Device Capabilities which influence Fieldbus segment are

    Availability of different function blocks in field devices

    Function Block Execution time

    VCR

    Device Operation parameters

  • 8/11/2019 Chennai 6.2.10 j Jepal Yokogawa

    4/25

    4

    2010 Fieldbus Foundation

    2010 FFIC-Chennai Conference

    Segment Design

    Maximum number of devices per segment (20 mA per device

    and no losses)

    FISCO FNICO HPT

    No. of devices 6 in IIC 9 in IIC *

    13 in IIB 16 in IIB

    * RIL and BORL projects Maximum 12 devices per segment

    06-Feb-2010 4

  • 8/11/2019 Chennai 6.2.10 j Jepal Yokogawa

    5/25

    5

    2010 Fieldbus Foundation

    2010 FFIC-Chennai Conference

    Typical Macro Cycle- 1 sec(AI and AO execution time of 100 msec, PID execution in the Host System, 16 devices per segment, 3 final control

    element in the segment)

    06-Feb-2010 5

  • 8/11/2019 Chennai 6.2.10 j Jepal Yokogawa

    6/25

    6

    2010 Fieldbus Foundation

    2010 FFIC-Chennai Conference

    Typical Macro Cycle-1 sec(AI and AO execution time of 50 msec, PID execution in the Host System 16 devices per segment, 3 final control

    element in the segment)

    06-Feb-2010 6

  • 8/11/2019 Chennai 6.2.10 j Jepal Yokogawa

    7/25

  • 8/11/2019 Chennai 6.2.10 j Jepal Yokogawa

    8/25

    8

    2010 Fieldbus Foundation

    2010 FFIC-Chennai Conference

    Typical Macro Cycle-500 msec(AI and AO execution time of 50 msec, PID execution in the Host System 7 devices per segment, 3 final control

    element in the segment)

    06-Feb-2010 8

  • 8/11/2019 Chennai 6.2.10 j Jepal Yokogawa

    9/25

    9

    2010 Fieldbus Foundation

    2010 FFIC-Chennai Conference

    Typical Macro Cycle-1 sec(AI and AO execution time of 100 msec, PID execution in positioner, 16 devices per segment, 3 final control element in

    the segment)

    06-Feb-2010 9

  • 8/11/2019 Chennai 6.2.10 j Jepal Yokogawa

    10/25

    10

    2010 Fieldbus Foundation

    2010 FFIC-Chennai Conference

    Typical Macro Cycle-1 sec(AI and AO execution time of 50 msec, PID execution in positioner, 16 devices per segment, 3 final control element in

    the segment)

    06-Feb-2010 10

  • 8/11/2019 Chennai 6.2.10 j Jepal Yokogawa

    11/25

    11

    2010 Fieldbus Foundation

    2010 FFIC-Chennai Conference

    Observation

    Maximum number of devices per segment does not have

    effect on macro cycle with respect to Function blockexecution time

    06-Feb-2010 11

  • 8/11/2019 Chennai 6.2.10 j Jepal Yokogawa

    12/25

    12

    2010 Fieldbus Foundation

    All function blocks control logic are implemented in the field devices

    Control in the field concept

    This control concept would be ideal as

    - it minimizes communication traffic

    - control is not affected even in case of H1 card failure

    - Host control system execution time and I/O scan rate does not affect

    control performance. This gives flexibility of adding more devices per H1

    card and enable future expansion without needing additional controllers,

    unless the expansion is big

  • 8/11/2019 Chennai 6.2.10 j Jepal Yokogawa

    13/25

    13

    2010 Fieldbus Foundation

    Limitations in Fieldbus segment design :

    1. Power Supply Requirement

    2. Macro Cycle Consideration3. Communication Limitations

    First two limitations are normally taken care while designing the segments

    Control in the field concept- concerns and remedy

    However, third limitation is not noticed and hence, may pose great limitations

    while implementing the control strategy or modification at later date or while

    adding new devices in the segment.

  • 8/11/2019 Chennai 6.2.10 j Jepal Yokogawa

    14/25

    14

    2010 Fieldbus Foundation

    Communication Through VCR

    VCR stands for Virtual Communication Relationship that

    provide for the transfer of data between FF devices

    Analogous to various fields of contact book of a mobile phone.Each mobile phone has defined address book limit.

    Similarly each FF device has defined number of VCRs.

  • 8/11/2019 Chennai 6.2.10 j Jepal Yokogawa

    15/25

    15

    2010 Fieldbus Foundation

    MORE ON VCR

    Similar to different types of contact labels such as land lineno., mobile no., e-mail address etc.; depending on applicationsrequirements, there are different types of VCRs.

  • 8/11/2019 Chennai 6.2.10 j Jepal Yokogawa

    16/25

    16

    2010 Fieldbus Foundation

    Control in the field concept- concerns and remedy

    Each device requires

    One Client/Server VCR for each MIB

    One Client/Server VCR for the Primary Host

    One Client/Server VCR for the Secondary host or maintenance tool

    One Sink/Source VCR for Alerts

    One Sink/Source VCR for Trends

  • 8/11/2019 Chennai 6.2.10 j Jepal Yokogawa

    17/25

    17

    2010 Fieldbus Foundation

    Control in the field concept- concerns and remedy

    Example from AG-181

    Total number of VCRs needed is:

    1 (AI_1) + 2 (PID) + 5 (Basic Device) = 8

    This example is not including one aspect..

    The face plate update in host system shall be through client/server VCR.

    Hence, one client/server VCR would be required for each function block

  • 8/11/2019 Chennai 6.2.10 j Jepal Yokogawa

    18/25

    18

    2010 Fieldbus Foundation

    Control in the field concept- concerns and remedy

    Example from AG-181

    Total number of VCRs calculated earlier:

    1 (AI_1) + 2 (PID) + 5 (Basic Device) = 8

    Un-noticed requirements :

    1 C/S VCR for AI and PID blocks each

    C/S for AI

    C/S for PID

    C/S for HHT

    C/S for FBT

    C/S for MIB

    Some devices consume 2 C/S VCRs for System

    management

    Now total VCR requirement is : 13

    Remember though there are two AI blocks shown in the

    diagram, the calculation considers P/S VCR for only one AI

    block

  • 8/11/2019 Chennai 6.2.10 j Jepal Yokogawa

    19/25

    19

    2010 Fieldbus Foundation

    IF ABOVE SOUNDS SENSIBLE,

    THEN HOW MANY VCRs SHOULD BE SPECIFIED ?

    SHOULD WE CONSIDER TODAYS REQUIREEMNT ONLY ?

    The users who adopted FF technology for monitoring only in the beginning,

    have subsequently moved control in the field.

    Considering users confidence in FF technology, isnt it good to safe guard thepresent investment and select devices, which can be used in future also, when

    the control from host is moved in the field?

    Control in the field concept- concerns and remedy

  • 8/11/2019 Chennai 6.2.10 j Jepal Yokogawa

    20/25

    20

    2010 Fieldbus Foundation

    2010 FFIC-Chennai Conference

    Device Operation Parameters

    Slot time -V(ST): Time necessary for immediate reply of the

    device. Unit of time is in octets (256 s).

    Minimum-Inter-PDU Delay-V(MID) : Minimum value of

    communication data intervals. Unit of time is in octets (256s).

    Maximum-Reply- Delay-V(MRD): The worst case timeelapsed until a reply is recorded. The unit is Slot time.

    06-Feb-2010 20

  • 8/11/2019 Chennai 6.2.10 j Jepal Yokogawa

    21/25

    21

    2010 Fieldbus Foundation

    2010 FFIC-Chennai Conference

    Device Operation Parameters

    06-Feb-2010 21

    V(ST) = 20

    V(MID) = 14

    V(MRD) = 6

    CD DATA CD

    30.72 msec 3.584 msec

    V(ST) = 8

    V(MID) = 12

    V(MRD) = 6

    CD DATA CD

    12.288 msec 3.072 msec

    V(ST) = 4V(MID) = 4

    V(MRD) = 3

    CD DATA CD

    3.072

    msec

    1.024

    msec

  • 8/11/2019 Chennai 6.2.10 j Jepal Yokogawa

    22/25

    22

    2010 Fieldbus Foundation

    2010 FFIC-Chennai Conference

    Device Operation Parameters

    06-Feb-2010 22

    Fieldbus I/O

    Host

    Control bus

    LAS Setting

    V(ST) = 20

    V(MID) = 14

    V(MRD) = 6V(ST) = 4

    V(MID) = 4

    V(MRD) = 3

    V(ST) = 8

    V(MID) = 14

    V(MRD) = 6

    V(ST) = 20

    V(MID) = 10

    V(MRD) = 5

    One odd device in the segment makes entire segment performance.

    Then why not to specify these parameters?

  • 8/11/2019 Chennai 6.2.10 j Jepal Yokogawa

    23/25

    23

    2010 Fieldbus Foundation

    2010 FFIC-Chennai Conference

    Very Small Macro Cycle 250 msec

    06-Feb-2010 23

  • 8/11/2019 Chennai 6.2.10 j Jepal Yokogawa

    24/25

    24

    2010 Fieldbus Foundation

    2010 FFIC-Chennai Conference

    Device Capabilities

    Are function block execution time, operation parameters and VCRs important

    specifications?

    06-Feb-2010 24

    If yes, which one is more important ?

    - In real life situation, device operation parameters have more impact on macrocycle time, schedule & unscheduled communication time, than function blockexecution time.

    - From future expansion and modification point of view, availability of enoughVCR is very important.

    - Function block execution time becomes important only in case of very shortmacro cycle time. However, the device operation parameters may not allow

    shorter macro cycle unless no. of devices are reduced in the segment.

    If above sounds sensible, standardize on these specifications..

    - Minimum 13 + few spare VCRs

    - Total communication time of a device should not be more than 15 msec

    (CD + Maximum Response Delay + Data + Minimum Inter PDU delay)

  • 8/11/2019 Chennai 6.2.10 j Jepal Yokogawa

    25/25