Chemical Safety Board History
description
Transcript of Chemical Safety Board History
1
www.csb.gov
Future of Chemical Safety
Manuel R. Gomez, DrPH, MS, CIHDirector of RecommendationsU.S. Chemical Safety BoardACS Annual Conference, Washington, DCAugust 30, 2005
2
www.csb.gov
Disclaimer
This presentation by Manuel R. Gomez of theUnited States Chemical Safety and HazardInvestigation Board (CSB) on August 30, 2005 tothe American Chemical Society’s AnnualConference has not been approved by the Boardand is given for general informational purposesonly. Any material in the presentation that did notoriginate in Board-approved reports is solely theresponsibility of the author and does not representthe official views of the Chemical Safety Board.
Copies of all CSB reports can be found atwww.csb.gov
3
www.csb.gov
Session Outline
• CSB History, Description andMission
• Chemical Safety– Brief look at recent past– Likely future drivers– Wild Cards
4
www.csb.gov
CSB Overview• Created By 1990 Clean Air Act
Amendments:– After catastrophic industrial
accidents in mid-late 1980s (Bhopal)• Also created:
– OSHA Process Safety Management (1992)– EPA Risk Management Program (1996)
• Independent agency• Modeled after NTSB• Presidentially-appointed Board (5)• Funded 1998, $9M budget, 45 staff
5
www.csb.gov
CSB OverviewMission• To promote prevention of industrial chemical accidents
that harm employees, damage the environment andendanger the public
Focus of Activity• Conduct Investigations• Determine Root/Contributing Cause(s)• Issue Prevention Recommendations to many parties
Impact• Not a regulatory or enforcement agency• Influence broad adoption of recommendations to
prevent recurrences
More information: www.csb.gov
6
www.csb.gov
Chemical SafetyRecent Past
• 1970s & mid-80s– Environmental/occupational laws & regs– Vigorous chemical safety activity– EPA, OSHA, NIOSH in world lead
• Mid-80s to today– Anti-regulatory climate– Judicial challenges– US now lagging
7
www.csb.gov
ExampleTSCA: Losing Steam?
• Adequate data ….developed …..[re] effect of chemicalsubstances and mixtures on health and the environment and….and development ….should be the responsibility of thosewho manufacture and those who process such chemicalsubstances and mixtures;
• Adequate authority should exist to regulate chemicalsubstances and mixtures which present an unreasonable riskof injury to health or the environment, and to take actionwith respect to chemical substances and mixtures which areimminent hazards;
• Authority….exercised….as not to impede unduly or createunnecessary economic barriers to technological innovationwhile fulfilling the primary purpose of this chapter to assurethat …substances and mixtures do not present anunreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment.
8
www.csb.gov
ExampleTSCA: Losing Steam
• Toxic Substances Control Act (1976)– Very little impact on existing chemicals
(99% of total chemical use by volume)– Very few test rules for chemicals– Precedent from legal challenges: EPA
has to “prove guilty” to act– Bottom line: Little progress in
knowledge re toxicity or exposures tomost chemicals in 30 years.
9
www.csb.gov
Future Chemical SafetyWhat Are the Likely Drivers?
• Reach Legislation in EU• Management system standards• Corporate social responsibility standards• Globally Harmonized System• High Production Volume Challenge• Others:
– Precautionary Principle– Workplace risk assessment protocols (EU)– Control Banding (UK and EU?)
10
www.csb.gov
REACH• R egistration
– Applies to all chemicals > 1Mton– Test & risk data according to volume– Use & exposure information required
• E valuation– Recipient develops risk assessment &
risk management• A uthorization
– New EU-wide agency reviews data– May impose risk management
requirements, even ban• Of CHEMICALS
11
www.csb.gov
REACHImplications
• Shifts burden to producers/importers• Comprehensive: Applies to all chemicals,
“old” and new• Affects entire product chain: addresses
uses and exposures• Can result in bans• Will affect chemical industry worldwide• It’s very likely to really happen.
12
www.csb.gov
MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
• Origin: ISO quality standards• Followed by environmental &
occupational health and safetystandards (some ISO)
• Based on Plan-Do-Check-Act Model&
• Heavy emphasis on continualimprovement, not “compliance”
13
www.csb.gov
MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS• Impact: 3rd party audit systems for
registration/certification• Huge market demand in Europe &
Asia• US lags but may be forced to catch
up– Responsible Care & US auto industry
using model !• Growing evidence of improved
performance, but jury still out
14
www.csb.gov
CORPORATE SOCIALRESPONSIBILITY STANDARDS
• Thousands of reports on web• ISO developing a guideline• Information disclosure, performance
metrics are central tenets• Chemical performance will be
prominent• Passing fad, PR, or real impact?
15
www.csb.gov
Globally Harmonized System• Basically a harmonized MSDS approach• Main impetus European• European parliament law this year?
– US when?• Real Goal: To help market for
chemicals (one MSDS,accepted/understood by all)
• Prelude/example of other European-ledharmonization?
• Example of growing strategic use ofstandardization by Europeans?
16
www.csb.gov
High Production VolumeChallenge--Summary
• Triggered by 1998 NGO report (ED)• Joint industry-EPA effort• Develop basic hazard data for high
volume chemicals (>1M lbs/yr)– SIDS data (OECD’s Screening
Information Data Set)• Not enough for full risk assessment• No exposure or use data required
17
www.csb.gov
High Production VolumeChallenge--Current Status
• Much info available, but highly technical• Online user-friendly HPVIS in late 2005?• Many new “orphan” HPV chemicals
since 1990• EPA prioritizing chemicals for more
data and risk assessments (when?)• Any “sleeper” asbestos among them?• What will be reaction of stakeholders
(communities, workers, consumers)?
18
www.csb.gov
OTHER TRENDS• Precautionary principle
– Europe: Weight of evidence & prevention– US:
Need to prove “guilty” precedentsLegalisticPiecemeal analysis
• Risk Assessment protocols forworkplace (EU Commission)
• Control Banding in workplace (UK,EU trend?)
19
www.csb.gov
WILD CARDS• Catastrophes (Bhopal, Cuyahoga River &
EPA, Gualey Bridge disaster and silicosiscompensation, Farmington mine explosion& MSHA, etc.)
• Terrorism Threat– Creating focus on chemical safety– Some legislative debate already– Can “security” trigger process safety &
prevention goals?• Liability• Ripple effect of European trends?
20
www.csb.gov
SOME SOURCES OF INFO• Text of Reach & other:
http://europa.eu.int/commk/environment/chemicals/reach.htm
• EPA information:http://www.epa.gov/chemrtk/volchall.htmChemical Right-to-Know Initiative
• Review & Commentary:www.chemicalspolicy.org
• American Chemistry Council: www.americanchemistry.com
• European chemical industry: www.cefic.be• OECD: www.oecd.org• Environmental Defense (see Chemical
Tracker):www.environmentaldefense.org/home.cfm