Check Dam Construction by Prioritization of Micro …...micro watershed based on Morphometric...
Transcript of Check Dam Construction by Prioritization of Micro …...micro watershed based on Morphometric...
Bonfring International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Science, Vol. 2, Special Issue 1, July 2012 20
ISSN 2277 - 5056 | © 2012 Bonfring
Abstract--- Water is one of the essential natural resources
of the whole world, the demand of water used by agriculture,
industry, and human and cattle consumption is the
increasing rapidly, particularly with the water resources
and its consumption will be increasing with the increase in
population.
The Morphometric analysis is one of the significant GIS
tool for Check dam construction and prioritization of Micro
Watershed even without soil map and land use/land cover
map. The morphometric parameters depends on the
behavior of total drainage system and its refers to spatial
relationship among streams or rivers. The parameters were
obtained with the help of Arc GIS and MS Office. The results
revealed that the Micro Watershed priorities are shows five
categorizes very high, high, medium, low and very low
priority, Seventeen suitable sites were identified for check
dam construction in fourteen highly prioritized Micro
Watershed.
Keywords--- GIS, Algorithms, Arc GIS, MS Office
I. INTRODUCTION
WATERSHED is an ideal unit for management of
natural resources that also supports land and water
resource management for mitigation of the impact of natural
disasters for achieving sustainable development. The
significant factor for the planning and development of a
watershed are its physiography, drainage, geomorphology,
soil, land use/land cover and available water resources.
Remote Sensing and GIS are the most proven tools for
watershed development, management and also the studies
on prioritization of micro-watersheds development and
management. Morphometric Analysis could be used for
prioritization of micro-watersheds by studying different
linear and aerial parameters of the watershed even without
the availability of soil maps. [1]
Water is one of the essential natural resource, without
which life cannot exist. Demand of water is increasing
with the increase of population. We need water for
agriculture, industry, human and cattle consumption.
Therefore it is very important to manage this very essential
resource with sustainable manner. Hence, we need proper
management and development planning to restore or
recharge water where runoff is very high due to various
V.S.S. Kiran, Geospatial Application Engineer, RSI Softech India
Pvt.ltd, Siliguri-734001, E-mail: [email protected] Y.K. Srivastava, Scientist, Regional Remote Sensing Service
Center-East, Kolkata, E-mail: [email protected]
topographical conditions. If proper management is planned
that will not only control surface soil erosion but also
recharge ground water. Remote Sensing and GIS have
become proven tools for the management and development
of water resources. Several studies have been carried out
worldwide and they have shown excellent results. Due to
advancement in satellites and sensing technology, it is
possible to map finer details of the earth surface and provide
scope for micro level planning and management. The study
area that is taken has severe water crises during the summer
season. The terrain is highly undulating with very high
runoff which causes minimum recharge of ground water
inspite of 1750 mm average annual rainfall. This high runoff
also causes the erosion of very fertile soil.
Figure 1: Location Map of Study Area
The present study aims at for the identification of
suitable sites for check dam construction by prioritization of
micro watershed based on Morphometric analysis using
Remote sensing data and GIS overlaying techniques. This
study is mainly helpful for the increasing agricultural based
livelihood and also to supplying the greater level of
irrigation facilities.
II. STUDY AREA
The study area has been taken is a part of Silai River
Basin in Simlapal block of Bankura district part of West
Bengal State. It is located on 22˚59’38.84”North to
22˚50’34.42”North latitude and 86˚55’20.15” to
87˚13’06.10” East longitudes. It has an average elevation of
57mtr (187 feet’s). Simlapal is a community development
block is in Khatra subdivision of Bankura district in West
Check Dam Construction by Prioritization of Micro
Watershed, using Morphometric Analysis as a
Perspective of Remote Sensing and GIS for
Simlapal Block, Bankura, W.B
V.S.S. Kiran and Y.K. Srivastava
A
Bonfring International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Science, Vol. 2, Special Issue 1, July 2012 21
ISSN 2277 - 5056 | © 2012 Bonfring
Bengal state, and it is bounded by the Khatra block in west,
Taldangra block in north, Sarenga block is south and also
covered west Midnapur district in east. The geographic
area of this block is 309.20 Sq Kms (119sqmile or 1144.04
hectares). (Fig-1)
III. METHODOLOGY
Standard False Color Composite (FCC) of high
resolution remote sensing data have been used for the
generation drainage network map. Whereas GIS have been
used as added tool for preparation of many vector layers.
Using all derived maps and vector layers, detailed analysis
is performed using Morphometric analysis parameters for
prioritization of micro-watersheds.
Table 1: Morphometric Parameters
S. No. Morphometric Factors Formulas
1 Drainage Density(Dd) Dd =
(Horton, 1945)
2 Stream frequency(Fu) Fu = N/A
(Horton, 1945)
3 Texture Ration(T) T =
(Horton, 1945)
4 Form Factor(Rf) Rf =
(Horton, 1945)
5 Circularity Ratio(Rc)
(Miller, 1953)
6 Elongated Ratio(Re) Re =
(Schum, 1956)
7 Compactness
Coefficient (Cc)
Cc =
(Horton, 1945)
8 Shape Factor (Bs) Bs =
(Horton, 1945)
9 Length of Overland
Flow (Lo)
Lo =
(Horton, 1945)
10 BIFURCATION RAIO
(Rb)
Rb =
(A. N. Strahler, 1956)
Bonfring International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Science, Vol. 2, Special Issue 1, July 2012 22
ISSN 2277 - 5056 | © 2012 Bonfring
Figure 2: Flow Chart of Methodology
“Where, A is the Area of MWS, P is the Perimeter of
MWS,N is the Total number of Stream Order,N1 is the Total
Number of first order streams,Nu is the Number of streams
of order u,Nu+1us the Number of streams of next higher
orders u,Lb is the Basin length in kms,L is the Total length
of all channels of all order in the drainage basin. “
The study area is covered by 73J/13 & 73N/1 Survey of
India toposheets on 1:50,000 scale and IRS LISS III & IV
satellite imagery with 23.5 and 5 meter resolutions, which
was acquired on 17th February 2003 and 21st January 2007
with path and row of 107/56 & 102/56 ware used as source
data.
IRS LISS-IV Data was geometrically corrected with
reference to already geo-corrected IRS LISS-III Data
keeping RMS Error within the range of sub-pixel and
geo-referenced image generated using nearest neighborhood
re-sampling method. The Lambert Conformal Conic
projection was used with Everest datum for the
geo-referencing. An AOI (Area of interest) layer of the
study area was prepared and applied to IRS LISS-IV data
for extraction of the study area. The methodology can be
divided into two parts one is rasterization and other one is
vectorization. The rasterization involves creation of
mosaicking, sub-set of image, image enhancement and land
use/ land cover maps etc. The vectorizations process
involves creation of vector layers like; administrative
boundaries (i.e. block and village boundaries), watershed
boundaries, drainage layers and also check dam positions
etc. . The drainage layer was digitized using Arc/Info tools.
The stream ordering was given to each stream is Using Arc
Info software by following Strahler [7] Stream ordering
technique. Stream order is a measure of the position of
streams in the hierarchy of the tributaries, the first order
stream which have no tributaries. (Fig-3, 3.1). Certain
limitations were followed in vectorization of
micro-watershed to maintain the physical area 5-10 Sq Kms.
Supervised classification technique was used to generate the
land use/land cover map. (Fig-4) Finally, the study area was
divided total 77 micro watersheds. The entire
methodology which has been adopted in this study is
explained in the flow chart (Fig-2).
Check Dam
Collateral Data
SOI
Reference Map
Geometric
Correction
Mosaicing of Maps
Extraction of
Study Area
Drainage Layer
Sub-Watershed
Micro-Watershed
Prioritized Map
IRS-1D
GCPS
Geometric
Rectification LU/LC
Layer
Morphometric
Analysis
Bonfring International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Science, Vol. 2, Special Issue 1, July 2012 23
ISSN 2277 - 5056 | © 2012 Bonfring
IV. RPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS
The morphometric analysis is one of the significant
geographical information system tool for prioritization of
micro-watershed even without soil map and land use/land
cover map. This model is depends on the behavior of total
drainage system. The drainage pattern refers to spatial
relationship among streams or rivers, which may be
influenced in their erosion by inequalities of slope, soils
rock resistance, structure and geologic history of a region.
Prioritization of micro- watershed in a water resource
management the morphometric analysis uses some very
crucial linear morphometric parameters such as Drainage
density (Dd), Texture ratio(T), Stream frequency (Fu),
Length of overland flow (Lo), Bifurcation ratio (Rb) and
aerial or shape morphometric parameters are Circularity
Ratio (Rc) , Elongated ratio (Re), Form factor (Rf), Shape
factor (Bs), Compactness coefficient (Cc). The
morphometric parameters computed for the analysis include
linear and aerial aspects (Table:1).
The parameters were calculated from area, perimeter,
basin length, drainage density, and stream length but
bifurcation ratio was calculated from the number of streams
in particular micro-watershed. Bifurcation ration being the
one of the very important parameter plays significant role in
prioritization of micro-watershed. All these parameters
were computed using ARC/INFO and MS Excel Software.
The values of all morphometric analysis are given in below
(Table 2). Linear aspects have a direct relation with the
erodability and aerial or shape aspect have indirect relation
with the erodability. The highest value of the linear
parameters was ranked as 1 and next highest value was
ranked 2 and so on, as well as the lowest value of aerial or
shape factor was ranked 1 and next lowest value was ranked
2 and so on (Table:3). After ranking of every single
parameter, the ranking value for every micro-watershed was
averaged to arrive at a compound value (Cp). The
Compound value is based on the average of all parameters
in single micro-watershed. Based on the derived Cp values
priority fixation was assigned to all the micro-watershed.
The priority fixation was categorized in the five categories
very high (≤30), high (>30≤37), medium (>37≤43), low
(>43≤50), very low (>50). Thus, out of 77 micro-watershed
14 were assigned very high priority as they have very low
compound values, 17 micro-watersheds were assigned high
priority, 15 micro-watersheds were assigned medium
priority having moderate compound values, 23
micro-watersheds assigned low priority with high
compound values and the remaining 6 micro-watersheds
were assigned very low prioritiy as they have very high
compounds values. The prioritization based on
morphometric analysis of all micro-watersheds of Simlapal
is shown in Table 3.
V. RESULTS & DISCUSSION
Prioritization of Micro-Watershed has been done by
using compound values derived by morphometric analysis.
Attributes of morphometric analysis is based on three
aspects namely linear, aerial and shape. These three
aspects were taken in consideration for deriving ten
parameters and computation of compound values. Based
on compound values 14 micro-watersheds were found very
high category, 17 micro-watersheds were found high
priority, 15 micro-watersheds were found medium priority,
23 micro-watersheds were found low category and 6
micro-watersheds were found very low priority. Maximum
prioritized watersheds are medium to low category which
falls eastern and southern part of the study area. The
highly prioritized watersheds are covered north western part
of the area and it’s decreased from the western side to the
eastern and southern side of the study area. (Fig: 5)
VI. CONCLUSION
The results of morphometric analysis can be considered
as first hand information for the positioning the check dams.
Main focus have been given to the high priority micro-water
shed and considering the drainage pattern 17 location have
been marked for the construction of check dams on 3rd
and
4th
order of streams. If needed detailed analysis of land use/
land cover, soil and slope maps can be performed for the
better location of check dams. Hence, it will be worth to
mention here that the morphometric analysis alone may not
be sufficient for the full proof decision on the construction
of check dams other related physical parameters also
required to be studied. The aim of this study was to
demonstrate the capabilities of remote sensing and GIS to
study the geometrical aspect of the watershed which are
very important in managing the watershed. The derived
information could be very much useful for the
administrative authorities to take certain measures in
management of water resources in the study area and they
can also performed certain decision making planning
activities for construction of check dam for improving water
availability.
REFERENCE
[1] Biswas, S., Sudhakar, S., and Desai, V.R, Prioritization of Sub-watershed based on Morphometric Analysis of Drainage Basin:
A remote sensing and GIS approach, Journal of the Indian Society
of Remote Sensing, 155-166, 1999. [2] Sachin, Prioritization of Micro-Watershed of Upper Bhama Basin on
the Basis of Soil Erosion Risk Using Remote Sensing and GIS
technology. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Pune, Department of Geography. 2005
[3] K. Nookaratnam et al., Y.K.Srivastava, V.VenkateswaraRao,
E.Amminedu and K. S. R .Murthy, Check Dam positioning by prioritization of micro-watershed using SYI models and
Morphometric Analysis : A remote sensing and GIS approach journal
of Indian society of Remote Sensing, Vol 33, No.1,2005 [4] S. K. Nag et al., Morphometric Analysis using Remote Sensing
techniques in the Chakra sub-basin Purulia district,- journal of Indian
Society of remote-sensing ,vol.26, no.1&2, 1998. [5] JVS MURTHY. Watershed Management In India,21-34
[6] Suresh. R, Soil and Water Conservation Engineering. Standard
published distr., Delhi. 48-51, 1997 [7] Strahler, Quantitative Geomorphology of basins and channel
networks, Handbook of applied hydrology, Published Mc. Grew Hill
book, New York. 1964
Mr. V.S.S.KIRAN was born in Jamshedpur, Jharkhand India, on July 26, 1986.He received his
B.A degree in Geography Honors in 2008 from
Ranchi University, Ranchi and M.Sc. degree in Remote Sensing and GIS in 2010 from Vidyasagar
University Paschim Midnapur. Presently he is
working as Geospatial Application Engineer in the Defense field at RSI Softech India Pvt.ltd, Siliguri.
His areas of interest are Watershed management,
Land Use/Land cover mapping, 2d and 3d GIS and Other Remote Sensing and GIS applications. He has presented many papers in national. He is a
member of Geospatial Development Organization. He received a President
Rover award in 2007 from Bharat Scouts and Guides
.Mr. Y K Srivastava, MSc, working as scientist/engr - SE at Regional
Remote Sensing Centre - E, Indian Space Research Organisation, Kolkata.
Bonfring International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Science, Vol. 2, Special Issue 1, July 2012 24
ISSN 2277 - 5056 | © 2012 Bonfring
Areas of interest are; water resource management and urban related studies
using remote sensing and gis. Also got some international publication as
well as national publication. Attended several workshops and seminars and
presented technical paper on application of remote sensing and gis.
Bonfring International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Science, Vol. 2, Special Issue 1, July 2012 25
ISSN 2277 - 5056 | © 2012 Bonfring
MWS
ID
AREA
(Kms²)
PERIMETER
(Kms)
DRAINAGE
LENGTH
(Kms)
N N1
DRAINAGE
DENSITY
(Dd)
BASIN
LENGTH
(Lb)
STREAM
FREQUENCY
(Fu)
TEXTURE
RATIO (T)
FORM
FACTOR
(Rf)
CIRCULA-RITY
RATIO (Rc)
ELONGA-TED
RATIO (Re)
COMPACT-NESS
COEFFI-CIENT
(Cc)
SHAPE
FACTOR
(Bs)
Length of
Overland Flow
(Lo)
BIFURCATION
RAIO (Rb)
1 1.05335 4.759833 2.255782 7 4 2.141526 1.35131 6.6454455 0.84037 0.57685 0.5844874 0.856838 1.308301483 1.7335554 1.070762825 2
2 1.17849 5.024419 2.469149 7 4 2.095174 1.44028 5.9397872 0.79611 0.56811 0.5868676 0.850322 1.30564572 1.7602249 1.047587059 1.333333333
3 1.47757 5.223397 2.735231 5 3 1.851168 1.63771 3.3839337 0.57434 0.5509 0.6808112 0.837345 1.212221675 1.8152073 0.925584177 1.5
4 1.04885 5.882109 3.769112 7 3 3.593565 1.34803 6.6739737 0.51002 0.57719 0.381094 0.857088 1.620240086 1.7325458 1.796782401 0.75
5 2.48662 6.008947 5.596754 9 5 2.250743 2.2011 3.6193643 0.83209 0.51325 0.8657611 0.808225 1.074970081 1.9483665 1.125371684 1.75
6 3.1148 10.42792 6.223963 11 3 1.998189 2.50151 3.5315237 0.28769 0.49777 0.3600973 0.79594 1.666807542 2.0089736 0.999094268 0.875
7 4.59716 9.91387 8.634873 15 8 1.878307 3.12053 3.2628862 0.80695 0.4721 0.5880138 0.775148 1.304372525 2.1181964 0.93915355 2.05
8 4.05537 8.84204 3.528333 3 0 0.87004 2.906 0.7397599 0 0.48022 0.6520939 0.781786 1.238626363 2.0823792 0.435019909 0
9 6.88038 11.14195 7.00899 15 8 1.018693 3.92372 2.1801131 0.71801 0.44691 0.6967462 0.754182 1.198279407 2.2376025 0.509346378 2.05
10 1.7236 5.44535 1.926953 3 1 1.117983 1.78743 1.7405456 0.18364 0.53948 0.7307502 0.828622 1.170067525 1.8536296 0.558991519 2
11 2.57967 6.674102 1.334134 1 1 0.517172 2.24751 0.3876462 0.14983 0.51069 0.7280538 0.806209 1.172232267 1.9581251 0.258586053 0
12 3.12708 8.649281 3.975207 5 3 1.271221 2.5071 1.5989376 0.34685 0.4975 0.5254883 0.795728 1.379792783 2.0100483 0.635610735 1.5
13 1.89742 5.431363 3.269174 5 3 1.722953 1.88769 2.6351504 0.55235 0.53248 0.8085959 0.823225 1.112319733 1.8780107 0.861476615 1.5
14 4.43884 8.79915 6.172238 7 2 1.390508 3.05902 1.5769896 0.22729 0.47436 0.7207296 0.776997 1.178173441 2.1081246 0.695253948 2.25
15 2.89395 6.549796 5.097786 13 7 1.761531 2.39917 4.4921281 1.06874 0.50277 0.8480476 0.799931 1.086138672 1.9889803 0.880765722 3.2
16 3.42138 7.945941 3.30956 3 2 0.967317 2.63852 0.8768389 0.2517 0.49145 0.6812326 0.790876 1.211846735 2.0347875 0.483658572 2
17 5.41457 11.25644 9.190225 11 3 1.697315 3.42451 2.0315563 0.26651 0.46171 0.537213 0.766569 1.364652778 2.1658698 0.848657262 1.055555556
18 4.64519 9.546993 6.584482 15 8 1.417484 3.139 3.229146 0.83796 0.47143 0.6407004 0.7746 1.249591066 2.1211929 0.708741774 1.708333333
19 1.97354 7.750802 2.560535 6 3 1.297434 1.93034 3.0402268 0.38706 0.52964 0.4129872 0.821026 1.556420997 1.8880828 0.648717237 1
20 2.40284 7.968614 4.051034 9 5 1.685935 2.15867 3.7455657 0.62746 0.51565 0.475712 0.810111 1.450184799 1.9393057 0.842967477 1.25
21 3.4062 7.62362 2.855509 5 3 0.838326 2.63186 1.4679097 0.39351 0.49175 0.7367715 0.791115 1.165276546 2.0335576 0.419163002 1.5
22 6.39886 11.85992 7.05947 7 2 1.103239 3.7653 1.0939448 0.16864 0.45134 0.5719051 0.757912 1.322614911 2.215632 0.551619331 0.833333333
23 4.4414 8.635415 4.679956 7 3 1.053711 3.06003 1.5760791 0.34741 0.47432 0.7487524 0.776967 1.155916019 2.1082902 0.526855735 1.666666667
24 4.41137 10.26001 6.659601 11 5 1.509646 3.04826 2.4935581 0.48733 0.47476 0.5268201 0.777325 1.378047644 2.1063456 0.754822799 2.6
25 2.7954 9.725953 2.590699 3 1 0.926773 2.35241 1.0731925 0.10282 0.50514 0.3715044 0.801818 1.641018389 1.9796299 0.46338651 0.5
26 3.79408 8.034549 2.439533 1 1 0.642984 2.79812 0.2635687 0.12446 0.48459 0.7388697 0.785334 1.163620812 2.0636028 0.321492181 0
27 3.77871 8.099532 4.870817 5 1 1.289016 2.79168 1.3232027 0.12346 0.48486 0.7241164 0.785551 1.175414956 2.0624641 0.644507857 1.666666667
Bonfring International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Science, Vol. 2, Special Issue 1, July 2012 26
ISSN 2277 - 5056 | © 2012 Bonfring
28 4.82331 8.812043 4.2549 3 0 0.882153 3.20682 0.6219792 0 0.46903 0.7808665 0.772621 1.131897221 2.1320758 0.441076542
0.5
MWS
ID
AREA
(Kms²)
PERIMETER
(Kms)
DRAINAGE
LENGTH
(Kms)
N N1
DRAINAGE
DENSITY
(Dd)
BASIN
LENGTH
(Lb)
STREAM
FREQUENCY
(Fu)
TEXTURE
RATIO (T)
FORM
FACTOR
(Rf)
CIRCULA-RITY
RATIO (Rc)
ELONGA-TED
RATIO (Re)
COMPACT-NESS
COEFFI-CIENT
(Cc)
SHAPE
FACTOR
(Bs)
Length of
Overland Flow
(Lo)
BIFURCATION
RAIO (Rb)
29 6.2999 10.01587 5.293509 3 0 0.840253 3.73212 0.4761982 0 0.4523 0.7894795 0.758716 1.125705998 2.2109403 0.42012657 0.5
30 2.21297 6.286959 2.63169 3 2 1.189211 2.06006 1.3556439 0.31812 0.52145 0.7038483 0.814658 1.19221853 1.9177163 0.594605662 2
31 3.08477 7.748569 2.489876 4 2 0.807151 2.48778 1.2966932 0.25811 0.49842 0.6458986 0.796465 1.244552517 2.0063281 0.4035757 1
32 1.9448 5.923228 1.857786 3 1 0.955258 1.91432 1.5425754 0.16883 0.5307 0.6968554 0.821846 1.198185532 1.88432 0.477629081 0.5
33 3.3937 8.117016 3.003638 3 1 0.885064 2.62637 0.8839921 0.1232 0.492 0.6475371 0.791313 1.242976936 2.0325404 0.442532046 0.5
34 6.22796 11.37332 7.559633 5 0 1.213822 3.70785 0.8028312 0 0.453 0.6052794 0.759309 1.285634313 2.2074898 0.60691087 1.666666667
35 4.29526 10.49201 3.5681 5 3 0.830706 3.00242 1.1640736 0.28593 0.47648 0.4905199 0.778737 1.42812784 2.0987188 0.415353101 1.5
36 3.1935 7.654786 3.878352 5 3 1.214451 2.53722 1.5656793 0.39191 0.49608 0.6851501 0.794591 1.208377276 2.0158026 0.607225489 1.5
37 3.51702 8.231918 5.484221 5 2 1.559338 2.68016 1.4216585 0.24296 0.48961 0.6524651 0.789394 1.23827403 2.0424312 0.779669007 0.666666667
38 4.50993 9.052729 4.527513 3 2 1.003899 3.08676 0.6651987 0.22093 0.47333 0.6918238 0.776158 1.202534811 2.1126851 0.501949254 2
39 3.88358 10.31354 4.640536 9 4 1.194913 2.83542 2.3174518 0.38784 0.48306 0.4589879 0.78409 1.476368501 2.0701566 0.597456557 1.333333333
40 6.92431 11.1951 7.437191 9 5 1.07407 3.93793 1.2997687 0.44662 0.44652 0.6945532 0.753856 1.200169676 2.2395402 0.537034856 2.333333333
41 2.15497 5.955269 5.47308 13 7 2.539746 2.02922 6.0325629 1.17543 0.52334 0.763877 0.816131 1.144415405 1.9108021 1.269873093 3.2
42 0.80297 4.181082 2.430922 9 5 3.027418 1.15825 11.208407 1.19586 0.59854 0.5774388 0.872799 1.316262213 1.6707316 1.513709233 1.25
43 4.18222 9.462495 2.247991 3 2 0.537512 2.95728 0.7173227 0.21136 0.47821 0.5871918 0.78015 1.305285173 2.0911201 0.26875582 2
44 3.6158 7.94861 2.76875 5 3 0.765736 2.72266 1.3828193 0.37742 0.48777 0.7194602 0.787909 1.179212316 2.0501399 0.38286806 1.5
45 2.75195 7.0886 1.129666 3 2 0.410497 2.33158 1.0901367 0.28214 0.50622 0.6885002 0.802672 1.205433845 1.9754168 0.205248449 2
46 0.88003 3.676035 1.533261 3 2 1.742285 1.22014 3.4089807 0.54406 0.59113 0.818695 0.867377 1.10543786 1.6916839 0.871142727 2
47 2.81144 7.158992 1.285033 2 2 0.457074 2.36007 0.7113804 0.27937 0.50475 0.6896187 0.801506 1.204455843 1.9811707 0.228536769 0
48 4.96744 10.78972 6.129848 7 3 1.234007 3.2609 1.4091778 0.27804 0.46715 0.5364101 0.771075 1.365673685 2.1406302 0.61700325 0.75
49 2.42649 6.938886 5.073953 7 4 2.091064 2.17071 2.8848221 0.57646 0.51496 0.6335547 0.809572 1.256618206 1.9418908 1.045532245 2
50 3.77119 7.714916 4.571731 11 6 1.212279 2.78852 2.916854 0.77771 0.48499 0.7965265 0.785658 1.120715283 2.0619051 0.606139603 1.833333333
51 5.84075 10.34762 6.043901 9 4 1.034782 3.5751 1.5408983 0.38656 0.45698 0.6857608 0.76263 1.207839077 2.1883027 0.517390878 0.8
52 5.28798 10.91838 5.390523 7 3 1.019391 3.3788 1.3237564 0.27477 0.4632 0.5576456 0.767804 1.339418421 2.1589128 0.509695667 1.666666667
53 4.54911 10.29887 4.817655 5 2 1.059033 3.10196 1.0991168 0.1942 0.47277 0.5391773 0.775702 1.36216459 2.1151717 0.5295166 0.666666667
54 2.551 7.556886 1.855925 3 1 0.727529 2.23329 1.1760109 0.13233 0.51147 0.5615763 0.806822 1.334722592 1.9551506 0.363764696 0.5
Bonfring International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Science, Vol. 2, Special Issue 1, July 2012 27
ISSN 2277 - 5056 | © 2012 Bonfring
55 3.4914 9.86382 1.301731 2 2 0.372839 2.66906 0.5728361 0.20276 0.4901 0.4511219 0.789787 1.489184249 2.0404014 0.186419694 0
56 6.16302 10.03895 3.757156 3 1 0.609629 3.68584 0.4867743 0.09961 0.45365 0.76878 0.75985 1.140760185 2.2043452 0.304814481 0.5
MWS
ID
AREA
(Kms²)
PERIMETER
(Kms)
DRAINAGE
LENGTH
(Kms)
N N1
DRAINAGE
DENSITY
(Dd)
BASIN
LENGTH
(Lb)
STREAM
FREQUENCY
(Fu)
TEXTURE
RATIO (T)
FORM
FACTOR
(Rf)
CIRCULA-RITY
RATIO (Rc)
ELONGA-TED
RATIO
COMPACT-NESS
COEFFI-CIENT
(Cc)
SHAPE
FACTOR
(Bs)
Length of
Overland Flow
(Lo)
BIFURCATION
RAIO (Rb)
57 5.39537 11.85662 4.334585 5 3 0.80339 3.4176 0.9267207 0.25302 0.46193 0.4824849 0.766755 1.439970376 2.1648238 0.401694982 1.5
58 7.24253 10.70496 10.00362 11 6 1.381232 4.03972 1.5188054 0.56049 0.4438 0.7945209 0.751556 1.122128885 2.2532677 0.690615998 1.2
59 5.72222 11.62894 9.402337 17 9 1.643128 3.53371 2.9708765 0.77393 0.45825 0.5319475 0.763694 1.371390122 2.1822094 0.821564166 1.625
60 2.79609 7.478741 1.020552 1 1 0.364992 2.35274 0.3576424 0.13371 0.50513 0.6284615 0.801804 1.26169991 1.9796965 0.182496228 0
61 6.08774 10.60122 5.053608 9 5 0.830129 3.6602 1.4783822 0.47164 0.45441 0.6809708 0.760485 1.212079675 2.2006636 0.415064689 2.3333333
62 5.42536 10.55835 6.006807 7 3 1.107172 3.42838 1.2902368 0.28414 0.46158 0.611816 0.766466 1.278748109 2.1664564 0.553585973 1.666666667
63 6.1577 12.11043 5.561387 4 2 0.903159 3.68403 0.6495929 0.16515 0.4537 0.5278183 0.759895 1.376743995 2.2040864 0.451579743 1
64 4.31526 11.23669 2.272903 4 2 0.526712 3.01036 0.9269421 0.17799 0.47618 0.4296507 0.778491 1.525940663 2.1000453 0.263356222 1
65 9.09469 14.65214 2.027935 5 2 0.22298 4.59754 0.5497717 0.1365 0.43027 0.5325618 0.740008 1.370598979 2.3241427 0.111490097 1.5
66 6.44666 11.63521 3.1758 1 0 0.492627 3.78126 0.155119 0 0.45088 0.5986472 0.757529 1.292736217 2.2178757 0.246313507 0
67 4.25014 8.360105 3.791922 3 2 0.892187 2.98447 0.7058587 0.23923 0.47717 0.7644775 0.779296 1.143965815 2.0957069 0.44609356 2
68 4.95198 11.12536 4.993029 5 3 1.008289 3.25513 1.0096963 0.26965 0.46735 0.502963 0.771239 1.410351571 2.1397234 0.504144344 1.5
69 1.93685 7.590725 1.531427 3 1 0.790677 1.90987 1.5489037 0.13174 0.53099 0.4225859 0.822075 1.538643127 1.8832711 0.395338703 0.5
70 4.10007 9.063721 1.10292 3 2 0.269001 2.92415 0.7316955 0.22066 0.4795 0.6274259 0.781203 1.262740694 2.0854857 0.134500275 2
71 5.24887 13.22413 1.651267 3 2 0.314595 3.36458 0.5715515 0.15124 0.46366 0.3773259 0.768191 1.628310094 2.1567342 0.157297371 2
72 3.48353 8.879076 1.671307 1 0 0.479774 2.66564 0.2870652 0 0.49025 0.5554801 0.789908 1.342026732 2.0397752 0.239887036 0
73 5.30161 11.85668 3.337994 3 0 0.62962 3.38374 0.5658663 0 0.46303 0.4740953 0.767669 1.45265536 2.1596684 0.314809777 2
74 3.41597 7.513405 1.272534 1 1 0.372525 2.63615 0.2927424 0.1331 0.49156 0.7607209 0.790961 1.146786892 2.0343498 0.186262272 0
75 2.94677 7.980335 2.7934 5 3 0.947955 2.42394 1.696776 0.37592 0.50154 0.5816851 0.798948 1.311449072 1.9938784 0.473977469 1.5
76 3.73364 7.573564 7.279132 18 10 1.949606 2.77272 4.8210287 1.32038 0.48565 0.8183082 0.786192 1.105699116 2.0591014 0.974802835 2.3333333
77 4.73872 8.628168 5.956045 11 6 1.256888 3.17475 2.3213007 0.6954 0.47016 0.8002188 0.773551 1.118126757 2.1269516 0.628444151 1.2
Table 2: Morphometric Analysis Results of All Micro-Watersheds
Bonfring International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Science, Vol. 2, Special Issue 1, July 2012 28
ISSN 2277 - 5056 | © 2012 Bonfring
MWS id PRIORITIZATION BASED ON Final Priority No
Dd Fu T Rf Rc Re Cc Bs Lo Rb Cp
1 5 3 5 74 29 74 49 4 5 24 27.2 1
2 6 5 9 73 30 73 48 5 6 54 30.9 2
3 11 12 16 72 44 72 34 6 11 70 34.8 2
4 1 2 20 75 4 75 74 3 1 10 26.5 1
5 4 9 7 62 77 62 1 16 4 57 29.9 1
6 8 10 34 52 1 52 77 26 8 69 33.7 2
7 10 13 8 25 32 25 46 53 10 11 23.3 1
8 52 58 76 36 42 36 36 42 52 29 45.9 4
9 41 23 12 4 53 4 25 74 41 2 27.9 1
10 33 25 54 71 60 71 18 7 33 65 43.7 4
11 67 72 60 60 59 60 19 18 67 19 50.1 5
12 25 27 32 51 15 51 63 27 25 61 37.7 3
13 14 19 18 70 73 70 5 8 14 7 29.8 1
14 21 28 48 29 57 29 21 49 21 35 33.8 2
15 12 7 4 55 76 55 2 23 12 33 27.9 1
16 44 56 45 46 46 46 32 32 44 38 42.9 3
17 15 24 42 15 21 15 57 63 15 1 26.8 1
18 20 14 6 24 39 24 39 54 20 45 28.5 1
19 23 15 27 67 5 67 73 11 23 26 33.7 2
20 16 8 14 64 11 64 67 14 16 12 28.6 1
21 54 36 24 48 61 48 17 30 54 66 43.8 4
22 35 49 57 6 26 6 52 72 35 36 37.4 3
23 38 29 31 28 63 28 15 50 38 14 33.4 2
24 19 20 21 30 16 30 62 48 19 50 31.5 2
25 47 51 69 58 2 58 76 20 47 72 50 4
26 62 76 66 38 62 38 16 40 62 30 49 4
27 24 42 67 39 58 39 20 39 24 3 35.5 3
28 51 65 75 22 68 22 10 56 51 56 47.6 4
29 53 71 73 7 69 7 9 71 53 60 47.3 4
30 32 40 33 65 55 65 23 13 32 64 42.2 3
31 57 44 43 53 40 53 38 25 57 39 44.9 3
32 45 32 56 68 54 68 24 10 45 16 41.8 3
33 50 55 68 49 41 49 37 29 50 23 45.1 4
34 29 57 77 8 34 8 44 70 29 63 41.9 3
35 55 47 35 32 13 32 65 46 55 73 45.3 4
36 28 30 25 50 47 50 31 28 28 62 37.9 3
37 18 37 46 43 43 43 35 35 18 25 34.3 2
38 43 63 49 27 51 27 27 51 43 15 39.6 3
39 31 22 26 37 9 37 69 41 31 51 35.4 2
40 36 43 23 3 52 3 26 75 36 37 33.4 2
41 3 4 3 66 65 66 13 12 3 32 26.7 1
42 2 1 2 77 27 77 51 1 2 43 28.3 1
43 65 60 51 34 31 34 47 44 65 40 47.1 4
44 60 39 29 42 56 42 22 36 60 74 46 4
45 71 50 37 59 49 59 29 19 71 21 46.5 4
46 13 11 19 76 75 76 3 2 13 34 32.2 2
47 70 61 38 56 50 56 28 22 70 20 47.1 4
48 27 38 39 20 20 20 58 58 27 27 33.4 2
49 7 18 15 63 38 63 40 15 7 8 27.4 2
50 30 17 10 40 71 40 7 38 30 13 29.6 2
Bonfring International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Science, Vol. 2, Special Issue 1, July 2012 29
ISSN 2277 - 5056 | © 2012 Bonfring
51 39 33 28 12 48 12 30 66 39 44 35.1 2
52 40 41 40 18 24 18 54 60 40 4 33.9 2
53 37 48 53 26 22 26 56 52 37 59 41.6 3
54 61 46 64 61 25 61 53 17 61 5 45.4 4
55 72 66 52 44 8 44 70 34 72 76 53.8 5
56 64 70 70 9 67 9 11 69 64 53 48.6 4
57 58 54 44 16 12 16 66 62 58 47 43.3 4
58 22 34 17 2 70 2 8 76 22 55 30.8 2
59 17 16 11 13 18 13 60 65 17 49 27.9 1
60 74 73 62 57 37 57 41 21 74 77 57.3 5
61 56 35 22 11 45 11 33 67 56 67 40.3 3
62 34 45 36 14 35 14 43 64 34 28 34.7 2
63 48 64 58 10 17 10 61 68 48 58 44.2 4
64 66 53 55 31 7 31 71 47 66 75 50.2 5
65 77 69 61 1 19 1 59 77 77 48 48.9 4
66 68 77 71 5 33 5 45 73 68 41 48.6 4
67 49 62 47 33 66 33 12 45 49 18 41.4 3
68 42 52 41 21 14 21 64 57 42 46 40 3
69 59 31 65 69 6 69 72 9 59 31 47 4
70 76 59 50 35 36 35 42 43 76 6 45.8 4
71 75 67 59 19 3 19 75 59 75 42 49.3 4
72 69 75 72 45 23 45 55 33 69 68 55.4 5
73 63 68 74 17 10 17 68 61 63 52 49.3 4
74 73 74 63 47 64 47 14 31 73 22 50.8 5
75 46 26 30 54 28 54 50 24 46 17 37.5 3
76 9 6 1 41 74 41 4 37 9 9 23.1 1
77 26 21 13 23 72 23 6 55 26 71 33.6 2
Bonfring International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Science, Vol. 2, Special Issue 1, July 2012 30
ISSN 2277 - 5056 | © 2012 Bonfring
MWS id PRIORITIZATION BASED ON Final Priority No
Dd Fu T Rf Rc Re Cc Bs Lo Rb Cp
1 5 3 5 74 29 74 49 4 5 24 27.2 1
2 6 5 9 73 30 73 48 5 6 54 30.9 2
3 11 12 16 72 44 72 34 6 11 70 34.8 2
4 1 2 20 75 4 75 74 3 1 10 26.5 1
5 4 9 7 62 77 62 1 16 4 57 29.9 1
6 8 10 34 52 1 52 77 26 8 69 33.7 2
7 10 13 8 25 32 25 46 53 10 11 23.3 1
8 52 58 76 36 42 36 36 42 52 29 45.9 4
9 41 23 12 4 53 4 25 74 41 2 27.9 1
10 33 25 54 71 60 71 18 7 33 65 43.7 4
11 67 72 60 60 59 60 19 18 67 19 50.1 5
12 25 27 32 51 15 51 63 27 25 61 37.7 3
13 14 19 18 70 73 70 5 8 14 7 29.8 1
14 21 28 48 29 57 29 21 49 21 35 33.8 2
15 12 7 4 55 76 55 2 23 12 33 27.9 1
16 44 56 45 46 46 46 32 32 44 38 42.9 3
17 15 24 42 15 21 15 57 63 15 1 26.8 1
18 20 14 6 24 39 24 39 54 20 45 28.5 1
19 23 15 27 67 5 67 73 11 23 26 33.7 2
20 16 8 14 64 11 64 67 14 16 12 28.6 1
21 54 36 24 48 61 48 17 30 54 66 43.8 4
22 35 49 57 6 26 6 52 72 35 36 37.4 3
23 38 29 31 28 63 28 15 50 38 14 33.4 2
24 19 20 21 30 16 30 62 48 19 50 31.5 2
25 47 51 69 58 2 58 76 20 47 72 50 4
26 62 76 66 38 62 38 16 40 62 30 49 4
27 24 42 67 39 58 39 20 39 24 3 35.5 3
28 51 65 75 22 68 22 10 56 51 56 47.6 4
29 53 71 73 7 69 7 9 71 53 60 47.3 4
30 32 40 33 65 55 65 23 13 32 64 42.2 3
31 57 44 43 53 40 53 38 25 57 39 44.9 3
32 45 32 56 68 54 68 24 10 45 16 41.8 3
33 50 55 68 49 41 49 37 29 50 23 45.1 4
34 29 57 77 8 34 8 44 70 29 63 41.9 3
35 55 47 35 32 13 32 65 46 55 73 45.3 4
36 28 30 25 50 47 50 31 28 28 62 37.9 3
37 18 37 46 43 43 43 35 35 18 25 34.3 2
38 43 63 49 27 51 27 27 51 43 15 39.6 3
39 31 22 26 37 9 37 69 41 31 51 35.4 2
40 36 43 23 3 52 3 26 75 36 37 33.4 2
41 3 4 3 66 65 66 13 12 3 32 26.7 1
42 2 1 2 77 27 77 51 1 2 43 28.3 1
43 65 60 51 34 31 34 47 44 65 40 47.1 4
44 60 39 29 42 56 42 22 36 60 74 46 4
45 71 50 37 59 49 59 29 19 71 21 46.5 4
46 13 11 19 76 75 76 3 2 13 34 32.2 2
47 70 61 38 56 50 56 28 22 70 20 47.1 4
48 27 38 39 20 20 20 58 58 27 27 33.4 2
49 7 18 15 63 38 63 40 15 7 8 27.4 2
50 30 17 10 40 71 40 7 38 30 13 29.6 2
51 39 33 28 12 48 12 30 66 39 44 35.1 2
52 40 41 40 18 24 18 54 60 40 4 33.9 2
53 37 48 53 26 22 26 56 52 37 59 41.6 3
54 61 46 64 61 25 61 53 17 61 5 45.4 4
55 72 66 52 44 8 44 70 34 72 76 53.8 5
56 64 70 70 9 67 9 11 69 64 53 48.6 4
57 58 54 44 16 12 16 66 62 58 47 43.3 4
58 22 34 17 2 70 2 8 76 22 55 30.8 2
59 17 16 11 13 18 13 60 65 17 49 27.9 1
60 74 73 62 57 37 57 41 21 74 77 57.3 5
61 56 35 22 11 45 11 33 67 56 67 40.3 3
62 34 45 36 14 35 14 43 64 34 28 34.7 2
63 48 64 58 10 17 10 61 68 48 58 44.2 4
64 66 53 55 31 7 31 71 47 66 75 50.2 5
65 77 69 61 1 19 1 59 77 77 48 48.9 4
66 68 77 71 5 33 5 45 73 68 41 48.6 4
67 49 62 47 33 66 33 12 45 49 18 41.4 3
68 42 52 41 21 14 21 64 57 42 46 40 3
69 59 31 65 69 6 69 72 9 59 31 47 4
70 76 59 50 35 36 35 42 43 76 6 45.8 4
71 75 67 59 19 3 19 75 59 75 42 49.3 4
72 69 75 72 45 23 45 55 33 69 68 55.4 5
73 63 68 74 17 10 17 68 61 63 52 49.3 4
74 73 74 63 47 64 47 14 31 73 22 50.8 5
75 46 26 30 54 28 54 50 24 46 17 37.5 3
76 9 6 1 41 74 41 4 37 9 9 23.1 1
77 26 21 13 23 72 23 6 55 26 71 33.6 2
Table 3: Prioritization Weightage of Micro-watersheds of Simlapal Block from Morphometric Parameters
Bonfring International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Science, Vol. 2, Special Issue 1, July 2012 31
ISSN 2277 - 5056 | © 2012 Bonfring
PRIORITY Fixation PRIORITY VALUES Micro-Watershed No
Very High (Cp<=30) 1 1,4,5,7,9,13,15,17,18,20,41,42,59,76
High (30<Cp<=37) 2 2,3,6,14,19,23,24,37,39,40,,46,48,49,50,51,52,58,62,77
Medium (37<Cp<=43) 3 12,16,22,27,30,31,32,34,36,38,53,61,67,68,75
Low (43<Cp<=50) 4 8,10,21,25,26,28,29,33,35,43,44,45,47,54,56,57,63,65,66,69,70,71,73
Very Low(Cp<50) 5 11,55,60,64,72,74
Table 4: Final Prioritization of Simlapal Block based on Morphometric Analysis
Figure 3: Stream ordering of Study Area Figure 3.1: Stream Ordering of Study Area
Figure 4: Land use/Land Cover of Study Area Figure 5: Micro-Watershed Priority with
Check Dam Location