Chatham Water Pollution Control Plant
16
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION FOR THE MUNICIPALITY OF CHATHAM-KENT CHATHAM WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLANT 2019 PERFORMANCE REPORT January 1 to December 31, 2019 Environmental Compliance Approval # 6551-8WXKHC
Transcript of Chatham Water Pollution Control Plant
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
FOR THE MUNICIPALITY OF CHATHAM-KENT
CHATHAM WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLANT
2019 PERFORMANCE REPORT
January 1 to December 31, 2019
Environmental Compliance Approval # 6551-8WXKHC
Plant Description The Chatham Water Pollution Control Plant provides treatment for wastewater for the community of Chatham. Wastewater is collected by 24 sewage pump stations and conveyed by a largely separated sanitary sewer system. Some combined sewers remain. Final effluent is discharged to the Thames River.
The Chatham Water Pollution Control Plant was first constructed in 1964 and underwent expansions in 1992 and 2004. The development of the facility has followed the growth of the municipality and the advancement in technology and regulations. The combined Plant 1 and Plant 2 facility has a rated capacity of 36,000m3/day, with a peak flow of 72,000m3/day.
The treatment system includes the following processes:
Raw sewage pumping
Screening collection and removal
Aerated grit removal using a grit chamber, grit slurry and cyclone
Chemical phosphorus removal
Primary treatment, primary sludge collection and pumping
Biological treatment using the Conventional Activated Sludge process
Final settling
Disinfection using Chlorine Gas and Sulphur Dioxide
Two-stage anaerobic digestion, sludge pumping and digested gas handling
Sludge Dewatering
In addition, recovered methane gas produced from the anaerobic digesters is used to power digester gas/natural gas fired boilers and the heat is consumed within the plant to offset energy costs.
As well, recovered methane gas produced by the anaerobic digesters powers a methane fired Generator which feeds power back to the hydro grid to generate revenue.
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS UNDER ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE APPROVAL #6551-8WXKHC
Summary and Interpretation of Monitoring and Comparison to the Effluent Limits: Condition 10 (6) (a) Tables 1 & 2 outline the monthly average results of parameters tested compared to the limits outlined in the Environmental Compliance Approval, Table 2 Effluent Limits. Success and Adequacy of the Works
During the reporting period, the annual average daily flow was 22,162 m3/day, which represents approximately 62% of the rated capacity of 36,000 m3/day. The maximum daily flow was 64,100 m3/day, which is 89% of the Peak Flow Rate of 72,000 m3/day.
Table 1: Summary of Monitoring Data and Comparison to Effluent Limits & Objectives – Concentrations
as well as rated capacity to the sewage works
Plant rated capacity of 36,000m3/day Total sewage flow to the works during a calendar year divided by the number of days during which sewage was flowing to the works that year
Month
Total
Monthly
Flow m3
Avg
Daily
Flow
/Month
m3/day
Avg
Daily
Flow/
Year
m3/day
% of
Plant
Capacity
CBOD5
mg/L
Total
S.S.
mg/L
Total
Ammonia
mg/L
Total P
mg/L pH
E.Coli /
100mL
CFU
Geomean
Total
Chlorine
Residual
mg/L
Limits: Dec 15 – Apr 15
None None 36,000 100 15 15 4.0 0.75 6.0 -
9.5
200 0.01
Limits: Apr 16 – Dec 14
None None 36,000 100 15 15 3.0 0.75 6.0 -
9.5
200 0.01
Objectives: Dec 15 – Apr 15
None None 36,000 100 10 10 3.0 0.60 6.0 -
9.5
150
Objectives: Apr 16 – Dec 14
None None 36,000 100 10 10 2.0 0.60 6.0 -
9.5
150
Jan 654,320 21,107 2.0 3.6 0.54 0.36 7.75 34.59 0.00
Feb 884,530 31,590 2.0 6.8 0.08 0.21 7.64 22.13 0.01
Mar 796,340 25,688 2.0 4.3 0.10 0.29 7.60 37.22 0.00
Apr 1,038,620 34,621 2.0 4.0 0.40 0.26 7.84 27.02 0.00
May 1,002,110 32,326 2.0 4.0 0.31 0.34 8.02 22.13 0.00
Jun 665,890 22,196 2.0 5.5 0.12 0.57 7.67 26.32 0.00
Jul 545,120 17,585 2.0 6.0 0.19 0.38 7.78 63.42 0.00
Aug 472,770 15,251 2.0 4.5 0.17 0.24 7.93 82.71 0.00
Sept 532,680 17,756 2.2 5.0 0.33 0.25 7.92 80.00 0.01
Oct 532,110 17,165 2.8 4.3 1.99 0.10 7.86 24.49 0.00
Nov 474,610 15,820 2.3 5.3 0.11 0.12 7.93 50.91 0.00
Dec 490,110 15,810 2.4 9.0 0.09 0.23 7.77 97.79 0.01
YEAR 22,162 62%
Yearly
Total Flow
m3
Yearly Maximums
8,089,210 34,621 2.8 9.0 1.99 0.57 8.02 97.79 0.01
Table 2: Summary of Monitoring Data and Comparison to Effluent Limits – Loadings Operating Problems and Corrective Action: Condition 10 (6) (b) There were no significant operating problems encountered during this reporting period.
Summary of Maintenance Activities: Condition 10 (6) (c) Routine maintenance was performed throughout the reporting period. Chatham-Kent PUC utilises an electronic preventative maintenance program to track preventative maintenance. In addition to the routine maintenance, the following additional maintenance activities and equipment replacement was completed for the reporting period:
Main Lift Pump #3 Rebuild $ 29,500
Replacement Chains & Flights for Plant #2 28,000
47’ ½” Checkmate Valve Pump Station 5 Storm Outfall 27,000
Lagoon Pump #1 Repair 19,800
Plant & Pump Station Electrical Upgrades 17,400
Piping Remediation (Main Lift) 16,900
Divers for Tidemate Install (Pump Station #5) 16,300
Automatic Composite Samplers (2) 15,400
New Check Valve (Pump Station #3) 12,400
New Transfer Pump Digester #3 11,700
New Pipes (Gas Room Basement) 10,700
Press Belts and Rollers 10,500
New Flow Meters (4) 9,900
Gas Room Maintenance & Inspection 9,300
Year
Avg
Daily
Effluent
Flow
/Year
m3/day
CBOD5
Kg/day
Total
S.S.
Kg/day
Total P
Kg/day
Limits: Receiver
None 540 540 27
Annual Average
2019 22,162 47.3 114.7 6.2
Replacement Press Conveyer Liners 8,500
New Impeller for Main Lift Pump #4 7,400
150 HP Blower Motor Repair 7,200
Runners for Final Chamber (Plant 2) 7,200
SCADA Remediation & New SCADA Computer 7,000
Sewer Plugs for Pipe Repairs (Grand Ave) 6,400
Portable Sampler 6,350
New In-ground Pipes 6,200
Gas RM Plug Valves 5,700
New Main Lift Pump #3 Impeller 5,500
Seal Kits for Vogelsang Pumps 5,350
Plant Blower Laser Alignment 4,100
Annual Flow, Pressure & Level Meter Calibrations 4,000
Press Replacement Equipment 3,900
Pump Station #3 Variable Frequency Drive (VFD) Repair 3,900
Pump Station #2 V.F.D. Repair 3,700
Aeration Valves (3) 3,600
Pump Station 3, Pump #3 VFD Repair 3,300
Rear Substation Reparation 3,300
Flight Chain Linkage and Blocks (Plant #1) 3,300
New Press V.F.D. 3,200
Main Lift Pump #4 Rebuild 3,000
Flight Chain Linkage and Blocks (Plant #2) 2,600
Boiler Inspection & Service 2,500
Backflow Inspection 2,400
Gas Room Electrical Upgrades 2,400
Seal Kit for Netzsch Pump 2,300
Vogelsang Wear Plates (6) 2,300
Tubing for Heat Exchanger #1 2,000
New VFD for Pump Station #22 1,800
Quality Assurance and Control Measures: Condition 10 (6) (d) The Chatham-Kent Public Utilities Commission followed a sampling schedule developed in accordance with the Environmental Compliance Approval and applicable regulations for this reporting period.
Composite chemistry samples of the raw flow were collected using an auto sampler. Chemistry samples were submitted weekly to an accredited laboratory for analysis of CBOD5, BOD5, Total Suspended Solids, Total Kjeldhal Nitrogen, Total Phosphorus, Total Ammonia Nitrogen, Nitrite and Nitrate, Alkalinity and pH.
Composite chemistry samples of the effluent were collected using an auto sampler. Chemistry samples were submitted weekly to an accredited laboratory for analysis of CBOD5, Total Suspended Solids, Total Kjeldhal Nitrogen, Total Phosphorus and Total Ammonia Nitrogen, Alkalinity, pH, Nitrite and Nitrate and Unionized Ammonia.
Bacteriological samples of the effluent were collected weekly according to the Sampling Program and submitted weekly to an accredited laboratory for analysis.
In house samples were analysed by a licensed operator for pH, temperature and D.O.
Calibration and Maintenance on Effluent Monitoring Equipment Condition 10 (6) (e) All required probes and sensors are cleaned, maintained and/or calibrated on a monthly basis or as required by manufacturers’ specifications. Monitoring equipment calibration/verification report(s) included for the following: • Effluent flow meter • Spectrophotometer • pH meter Effluent Objectives Condition 10 (6) (f)
Table 1 outlines monthly average results of parameters tested compared to the objectives outlined in the Certificate of Approval Table 1 Effluent Objectives.
Sludge Management Condition 10 (6) (g) The sludge generated at the facility is treated and air dried on site for 1 year, then land applied at the Ridge Landfill as top cover.
MONTH
DISPOSAL AREA
SLUDGE QUALITY
SLUDGE QUANTITY
LAND APPLIED m3
June
Ridge Landfill
Within Ministry Guidelines
559.26
July
Ridge Landfill
Within Ministry Guidelines
2,321.57
August
Ridge Landfill
Within Ministry Guidelines
2,954.97
Total 5,835.8
Outline of Anticipated Volumes in Next Reporting Period
The sludge production and sludge handling method for the coming reporting period is anticipated to be the similar to that of this reporting period. Community Complaints: Condition 10 (6) (h) There were no Customer Complaints received during the reporting period. By-pass, Spill, or Abnormal Discharge Events: Condition 10 (6) (i) A Pump Station Bypass event of 4,234 m3 occurred on May 02 for 14 hours immediately downstream from Pump Station #10, 251 Park Ave West, Chatham. The Bypass event resulted from heavy rainfall over the previous two weeks.
Other Information the District Manager Requires: Condition 10 (6) (j) No other information was required from the District Manager during this reporting period.
APPENDIX A Yearly Operational Data Summary for the Reporting Period
Mun
icip
ality
of C
hath
am-K
ent
Publ
ic U
tiliti
es C
omm
issio
nCh
atha
m W
ater
Pol
lutio
n Co
ntro
l Pla
ntW
orks
# 1
1000
0098
Ope
ratio
nal D
ata
Year
ly S
umm
ary 1
20
19
Ja
n.
Fe
b.
Ma
rch
Ap
ril
Ma
yJ
un
eJ
uly
Au
g.
Se
pt.
Oc
t.N
ov.
De
c.
TO
TA
LM
AX
MIN
AV
G
Tota
l Flo
w 1
03m
36
54
.32
08
84
.53
07
96
.34
01038.6
20
1002.1
10
66
5.8
90
54
5.1
20
47
2.7
70
53
2.6
80
53
2.1
10
47
4.6
10
49
0.1
10
80
89
.21
01
03
8.6
20
47
2.7
70
67
4.1
01
Avg.
Dai
ly F
low
103
m3
21
.10
73
1.5
90
25
.68
83
4.6
21
32
.32
62
2.1
96
17
.58
51
5.2
51
17
.75
61
7.1
65
15
.82
01
5.8
10
34
.62
11
5.2
51
22
.16
2
Max
. Dai
ly F
low
103
m3
49
.46
06
0.6
80
43
.24
06
4.1
00
60
.74
03
1.3
20
30
.79
02
1.9
60
32
.97
04
0.2
00
26
.13
02
3.1
80
64
.10
02
1.9
60
40
.39
8
Dirv
erte
d to
Lag
oons
103
m3
20
.04
81
29
.30
51
3.5
53
34
7.1
72
34
.26
51
0.5
69
20
.11
68
.26
82
4.1
65
18
.24
17
.62
08
.43
93
47
.17
27
.62
05
3.4
80
Lago
ons D
ischa
rge
103m
30
.00
00
.00
00
.00
00
.00
00
.00
00
.00
00
.00
00
.00
00
.00
00
.00
00
.00
00
.00
00
.00
00
.00
00
.00
00
.00
0
Avg.
Dai
ly F
low
103
m3
21
.10
73
1.5
90
25
.68
83
4.6
21
32
.32
62
2.1
96
17
.58
51
5.2
51
17
.75
61
7.1
65
15
.82
01
5.8
10
26
6.9
15
34
.62
11
5.2
51
22
.16
2
To
tal V
olu
me
In
m
34
47
53
02
15
30
03
37
25
71
05
56
24
45
23
57
06
10
95
35
77
10
66
85
26
08
85
71
06
30
21
50
74
Avg.
T.S
. %
3.7
4.5
3.7
3.9
4.1
3.5
3.3
0.0
2.9
2.6
3.0
3.3
4.5
0.0
3.2
Avg.
V.S
. %
63
.56
1.0
62
.95
9.5
53
.25
3.2
52
.90
.06
5.0
56
.55
3.4
51
.46
4.9
80
52
.7
Tota
l Vol
ume
Out
m
32
82
92
33
34
00
42
97
14
04
94
06
63
55
03
22
13
90
43
90
95
11
04
42
94
43
75
51
10
23
33
36
98
Avg.
T.S
. %
3.1
3.5
2.3
2.8
10
.53
.02
.72
.42
.62
.62
.62
.91
0.5
2.3
3.4
Avg.
V.S
. %
51
.14
8.6
51
.15
0.2
43
.94
5.9
49
.44
6.5
54
.74
9.7
49
.55
0.2
54
.74
3.9
49
.2
Tota
l Vol
ume
Out
m
33
33
12
66
54
53
43
22
04
94
24
51
03
98
33
54
04
41
34
16
05
12
74
71
84
91
43
51
27
26
65
40
95
Avg.
T.S
. %
1.9
2.1
2.2
2.2
3.0
2.8
2.4
2.2
1.9
2.2
2.4
2.3
3.0
1.9
2.3
Avg.
V.S
. %
50
.14
9.6
50
.15
0.3
44
.34
6.1
48
.94
9.1
54
.24
9.2
50
.15
3.4
54
.24
4.3
49
.6
To
tal H
ou
rs O
pe
rate
d2
12
.81
94
.02
17
.11
64
.61
96
.82
39
.41
86
.32
17
.22
13
.21
87
.81
32
.42
33
.02
39
4.5
23
9.4
13
2.4
19
9.5
Tota
l Slu
dge
Dew
ater
ed m
36
62
86
03
26
53
05
49
77
26
88
72
06
76
17
23
17
47
35
37
74
50
27
47
57
94
95
87
20
45
02
66
25
T.S
. S
lud
ge
%
3.5
3.6
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
2.7
3.1
3.6
2.7
3.2
Po
lym
er
# 7
57
Ib
s/m
on
th7
53
61
58
65
68
08
20
91
26
27
80
88
57
46
85
89
93
48
92
79
34
46
87
44
Ca
ke
To
tal S
olid
s %
15
.31
7.9
17
.91
7.4
19
.11
6.5
17
.51
8.5
17
.51
7.3
16
.41
6.8
20
8.1
19
.11
5.3
17
.3
Iro
n D
osa
ge
mg/L
5.0
53
.49
3.0
73
.11
3.0
35
.80
7.4
97
.20
3.7
05
.42
5.1
54
.89
57
.47
.53
.04
.8
Fe
rro
us C
hlo
rid
e k
g/D
75
.21
75
.70
58
.57
70
.47
68
.03
93
.62
10
8.9
61
08
.97
45
.61
69
.19
62
.10
56
.87
89
31
09
46
74
Ph
os
ph
oro
us
Re
mo
va
l C
he
mic
als
Ra
w S
ew
ag
e
Fin
al E
fflu
en
t
Ra
w S
lud
ge
# 1
Pri
ma
ry D
ige
sti
on
# 3
Pri
ma
ry D
ige
sti
on
Be
lt P
res
s
Mun
icip
ality
of C
hath
am-K
ent
Publ
ic U
tiliti
es C
omm
issio
nCh
atha
m W
ater
Pol
lutio
n Co
ntro
l Pla
ntW
orks
# 1
1000
0098
Ope
ratio
nal D
ata
Year
ly S
umm
ary 2
20
19
Ja
n.
Fe
b.
Ma
rch
Ap
ril
Ma
yJ
un
eJ
uly
Au
g.
Se
pt.
Oc
t.N
ov.
De
c.
TO
TA
LM
AX
MIN
AV
G
Ch
lorin
e U
se
d k
g/D
14
09
.51
59
9.0
17
71
.51
89
1.5
16
53
.51
48
9.0
10
90
.51
12
8.5
13
33
.01
27
7.0
13
43
.01
11
9.0
17
10
5.0
41
89
1.5
10
90
.51
42
5.4
2
Ch
lorin
e D
osa
ge
mg/L
2.2
31
.90
2.3
02
.05
1.7
52
.29
2.0
92
.43
2.6
32
.53
2.8
72
.31
2.8
71
.75
2.2
8
SO2 U
sed
kg/D
12
71
.51
26
5.0
14
09
.51
25
5.0
13
57
.51
26
4.0
98
5.5
90
3.0
13
06
.01
08
2.0
98
6.5
11
17
.01
42
02
.51
40
9.5
90
31
18
4
SO2 D
osag
e m
g/L
2.0
71
.58
1.8
21
.38
1.4
81
.96
1.9
11
.94
2.5
62
.20
2.1
32
.32
2.5
61
.38
1.9
5
Fina
l Res
idua
l mg/
L0
.00
0.0
10
.00
0.0
00
.00
0.0
00
.00
0.0
00
.01
0.0
00
.00
0.0
10
.01
0.0
00
.01
E.Co
li Av
erag
e /1
00m
L3
4.5
92
2.1
33
7.2
22
7.0
22
2.1
32
6.3
26
3.4
28
2.7
18
0.0
02
4.4
95
0.9
19
7.7
99
7.7
92
2.1
34
7.4
0
Ra
w S
ew
ag
e A
ve
rag
ep
H
7.5
37
.65
7.5
27
.75
7.8
67
.59
7.6
37
.66
7.6
67
.23
7.6
17
.59
7
.86
7.2
25
7.6
1
Am
mo
nia
as N
,
mg/L
21
15
19
19
16
20
25
35
27
26
26
28
35
.31
5.3
23
.0
Nitro
ge
n,
T.
Kje
lda
hl a
s N
, m
g/L
26
19
25
23
20
26
32
39
33
32
33
32
39
18
.52
8.3
Ph
osp
ho
rou
s,
To
tal a
s P
, m
g/L
3.3
2.6
4.1
4.6
5.8
9.2
8.0
9.1
5.9
5.2
8.6
8.3
9.2
2.6
6.2
So
lids,
Su
sp
en
de
d
mg/L
22
61
83
19
32
35
31
54
25
32
03
93
30
63
65
57
04
70
57
01
83
33
3
Alk
alin
ity C
aC
O3
, m
g/L
32
62
90
29
53
34
29
82
93
30
83
43
28
42
68
24
83
08
34
32
47
.52
99
BO
D5
, m
g/L
13
81
15
11
71
02
12
71
50
14
91
50
18
22
80
17
81
60
28
01
02
15
4
pH
7.7
57
.64
7.6
07
.84
8.0
27
.67
7.7
87
.93
7.9
27
.86
7.9
37
.77
8
.02
7.6
07
.81
Am
mo
nia
as N
,
mg/L
0.5
40
.08
0.1
00
.40
0.3
10
.12
0.1
90
.17
0.3
31
.99
0.1
10
.09
1.9
90
.08
0.3
7
NH 3
Un-
Ioni
zed
- Fed
eral
0.0
03
10
.00
06
0.0
00
60
.00
32
0.0
02
10
.00
08
0.0
01
40
.00
24
0.0
03
40
.02
00
0.0
01
00
.00
22
0.0
20
00
.00
06
0.0
03
4
Nitro
ge
n,
T.
Kje
lda
hl a
s N
, m
g/L
1.2
0.8
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.7
1.2
0.7
1.3
2.5
1.2
1.0
2.4
60
.67
1.1
2
Nitra
te a
s N
,
mg/L
13
.17
12
.20
11
.88
11
.55
9.3
31
7.2
81
8.9
11
3.3
32
0.5
86
.20
17
.53
21
.54
21
.54
6.2
01
4.4
6
Nitrite
as N
,
mg/L
0.0
31
0.0
13
0.0
21
0.0
38
0.0
35
0.0
11
0.0
28
0.0
11
0.0
27
0.0
94
0.0
19
0.0
12
0.0
94
0.0
11
0.0
3
Ph
osp
ho
rou
s,
To
tal a
s P
, m
g/L
0.3
60
.21
0.2
90
.26
0.3
40
.57
0.3
80
.24
0.2
50
.10
0.1
20
.23
0.5
70
.10
0.2
8
So
lids,
Su
sp
en
de
d
mg/L
3.6
6.8
4.3
4.0
4.0
5.5
6.0
4.5
5.0
4.3
5.3
9.0
9.0
3.6
5.2
Alk
alin
ity C
aC
O3
, m
g/L
19
41
73
19
31
96
22
01
35
13
41
75
13
21
70
18
01
64
22
01
32
17
2
CB
OD
5, m
g/L
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.2
2.8
2.3
2.4
2.8
2.0
2.1
D.O
. A
vg.
m
g/L
7.7
8.4
8.2
8.6
8.5
7.6
6.7
6.0
6.0
6.3
6.9
7.4
8.6
6.0
7.4
Te
mp
era
ture
C1
1.4
79
.59
10
.61
12
.29
14
.93
18
.97
21
.97
23
.10
23
.68
20
.75
17
.23
14
.59
23
.68
9.5
91
6.6
0
Sept
age
Rece
ived
m3/D
ay1
31
.72
54
.92
13
.54
29
.96
79
.63
57
.15
27
.43
83
.82
87
.03
18
.22
35
.72
03
.74
02
2.4
86
79
.58
13
1.7
33
35
.2
Leac
hate
mon
thly
tota
l 100
0m3
32
07
.23
18
3.0
32
37
.33
25
1.7
42
24
.92
30
4.1
26
42
.81
64
0.3
21
13
.03
98
9.6
39
36
.03
44
8.0
37
17
7.8
42
24
.91
64
0.2
73
09
8.2
Tota
l Grit
Rem
oved
m3
12
12
12
12
15
12
12
15
12
12
01
21
38
15
01
2
Dis
infe
cti
on
Fin
al E
fflu
en
t A
ve
rag
e
Le
ac
ha
te, S
ep
tag
e &
Gri
t
APPENDIX B Calibration Reports for the Reporting Period
Multi-Wavelength ColorimeterVerification Report
88CD2508D5CE3EEF068BDC2B5D0B3261.xls "If we don't measure it, how do you manage it?"
CUSTOMER Municipality of Chatham-Kent [MUT] MANUFACTURER HACHCONTACT Tim Dickinson MODEL DR3900
Chief Operator, Chatham STP SERIAL NUMBER 1613114325 Grand Ave CLIENT TAG Chatham STPChatham Ontario LOCATION Chatham STPT: 519-359-3811 OTHER n/aE. [email protected]
VER. BY Randy Nichol TOLERANCE [mg/L] 0.05STANDARD RECOVERY [%] 90
VERIFICATION DATE Mar 12, 2019CAL. FREQUENCYCAL. DUE DATE
CHLORINE [Cl2] SECONDARY STANDARDS
CHLORINE [Cl2] PRIMARY STANDARDS
STANDARD VALUE [mg/L] 27.3 BLANK SAMPLE SIZE [mL]STANDARD ADDITIONS SIZE [mL] 0.200
DPD LOT#EXPIRY DATE
COMMENTS [QMS] INFORMATION ITEM ID #[REFERENCE] HACH PCII 110.0 mL PIPETTE 10.2 mL PIPETTE 1SECONDARY STANDARDS 1PRIMARY STANDARDS 1ABSORBANCE STANDARDS 1
HACH-PP-10
AS-CLPSAS-CLSSG-PP-2
0.00
98.10.00 PASS
0.00 PASS
PASS
HACH PC II
May-23
N/A
STANDARD
PASS 94.2
PASS
AS FOUND CERTIFICATION
0.00
96.2
A8134
RECOVERY
PASS
DIFF.ERROR
0.53
STD 3
10.0
96.2
0
0.14 PASS
STD 1STD 2
%
AVERAGE RESULTS
0.600 10.600 1.55 1.46 1.461.01
STD 3
0.200 10.200 0.54 0.530.400 10.400
BLANK 0 10.000 0 0 0
COMBINED
mg/Lmg/LREADING FAIL
PASSREFERENCESTANDARD
MUT
+/-
0.230.921.71
PASS0.10
SAMPLETEST
#
Cl2STANDARD
mLSAMPLE
mL
1.01
1.71
+/-
STANDARD BLANK [mg/L]
0.250.94
0.09
READINGmg/L
PASS
REFERENCEREADING
mg/L
FAIL
mg/L
1.05
STD 1STD 2 +/-
AnnualMarch , 2020
WAVELENGTH PASS/FAIL
AS-ABS
ABSORBANCE CHECKS
PASS
Yes PASSYes PASSYes PASSYes PASS
560 nm610 nm
520 nm420 nm
TESTED
Primary and Secondary standards were used to confirm the overall accuracy of this instrument along with conducting an analytical comparative technique against a reference meter. All values are considered "AS FOUND" readings. If the "AS FOUND" readings were not within acceptable limits, an "AS LEFT" report will be issued if the instrument was able to be calibrated to indicate the overall accuracy of the meter. If the meter was not calibrated for any reason, a comment will be issued for this instrument.
Quality Management Standards Information - Standards, reference equipment, and instrumentation used to conduct this test outlining the lot#, and expiry date is found in our current QMS document.
Cl 2 ColorimeterVerification Report
A317D8761A3E136A330475CCEFBB1311.xls "If we don't measure it, how do you manage it?"
CUSTOMER Municipality of Chatham-Kent [MUT] MANUFACTURER HACHCONTACT Tim Dickinson MODEL Pocket Colorimeter II
Chief Operator, Chatham STP SERIAL NUMBER 08070E105502325 Grand Ave CLIENT TAG n/aChatham Ontario LOCATION Chatham STPT: 519-359-3811 OTHER n/aE. [email protected]
VER. BY Randy Nichol TOLERANCE [mg/L] 0.05STANDARD RECOVERY [%] 90
VERIFICATION DATE Mar 12, 2019CAL. FREQUENCYCAL. DUE DATE
CHLORINE [Cl2] SECONDARY STANDARDS
CHLORINE [Cl2] PRIMARY STANDARDS
STANDARD VALUE [mg/L] 27.3 BLANK SAMPLE SIZE [mL]STANDARD ADDITIONS SIZE [mL] 0.200
DPD LOT#EXPIRY DATE
COMMENTS
[QMS] INFORMATION ITEM ID #[REFERENCE] HACH PCII 110.0 mL PIPETTE 10.2 mL PIPETTE 1SECONDARY STANDARDS 1PRIMARY STANDARDS 1
PASS
HACH-PP-10
AS-CLPSAS-CLSSG-PP-2
0.00
98.10.01 PASS
PASS
HACH PC II
May-23
N/A
STANDARD
PASS 94.2
PASS
AS FOUND CERTIFICATION
0.01
0.911.68
AnnualMarch, 2020
0.01 PASS 96.2
A8134
PASS
RECOVERY
0.54
STD 3
10.0
96.2
0
0.14 PASS
STD 1STD 2
%
AVERAGE RESULTS
0.600 10.600 1.55 1.46 1.461.05 1.01
STD 3
0.200 10.200 0.54 0.530.400 10.400
BLANK 0 10.000 0 0 0
DIFF.ERROR
mg/Lmg/LREADING FAIL
PASSCOMBINEDSAMPLE
mL
REFERENCESTANDARD
FAIL
mg/L
+/-+/-
0.22
SAMPLETEST
#
Cl2STANDARD
mL
1.68
+/-
STANDARD NIST STD [mg/L]
0.260.92
0.09STD 1STD 2 0.10
READINGmg/L
PASS
REFERENCEREADING
mg/L
MUT
PASS
1.02
Primary and Secondary standards were used to confirm the overall accuracy of this instrument along with conducting an analytical comparative technique against a reference meter. All values are considered "AS FOUND" readings. If the "AS FOUND" readings were not within acceptable limits, an "AS LEFT" report will be issued if the instrument was able to be calibrated to indicate the overall accuracy of the meter. If the meter was not calibrated for any reason, a comment will be issued for this instrument.
Quality Management Standards Information - Standards, reference equipment, and instrumentation used to conduct this test outlining the lot#, and expiry date is found in our current QMS document.
pHVerification/Calibration Report
C3729813EC86D46A2354CD082E514885.xls "If we don't measure it, how do you manage it?"
CUSTOMER Municipality of Chatham-Kent [MUT] MANUFACTURER HACHCONTACT Tim Dickinson MODEL Sension +ph
Chief Operator, Chatham STP SERIAL NUMBER 608073325 Grand Ave CLIENT TAG n/aChatham Ontario LOCATION Chatham STPT: 519-359-3811 OTHER E. [email protected]
VER. BY Randy Nichol TOLERANCE [pH] 0.05
VERIFICATION DATE Mar 5, 2019CAL. FREQUENCYCAL. DUE DATE
pH VERIFICATIONNIST TRACEABLE (BUFFERS)
BEFORE CALIBRATION
CORRECTED
AFTER CALIBRATION
CORRECTED
mv offset/AssymetrySlope
COMMENTS [QMS] INFORMATION ITEM ID #
no calibration needed[REFERENCE]4.01 BUFFER 17.01 BUFFER 110.01 BUFFER 1TEMPERATURE REF. 1
pHBUFF4
DDTEMPpHBUFF10pHBUFF7
pH TEMP. pH pH
RESULT PASS
PASS° C DIFF.
7.0210.09
15.7
PASSPASS
pH TEMP. pH pH TEMP. pH - ERROR
15.815.815.8
AnnualMar-2020
REFERENCE BUFFER
FAIL
PASSPASS
TEMP. pH - ERROR PASS
RESULT PASS
BUFFER4.017.01
10.01
° C
-0.02-0.01
4.00 4.02 15.6 0.027.04
PASS
BUFFER
[MUT] READINGS
° C ° C DIFF. FAIL
[MUT] READINGSREFERENCE BUFFER
4.01 15.8 4.00 4.02 15.6 0.027.01 15.8 7.04 7.02 15.7 -0.02
10.01 15.8 10.10 10.09 15.8 -0.01 PASS
n/an/a
PASSPASS[MUT] AS FOUND
[MUT] AS LEFT
10.10 15.8
NIST Traceable Buffers were used to confirm the overall accuracy of this instrument. "AS FOUND" readings and "AS FOUND" readings are reported within this report. A temperature device was used to measure and record the buffer temperature to correct for pH values due to the effects related to buffer temperature.
Quality Management Standards Information - Standards, reference equipment, and instrumentation used to conduct this test outlining the lot#, and expiry date is found in our current QMS document.
Dissolved OxygenVerification/Calibration Report
BA187A63B7AD88B047C4AB4C4A8D72F4.xls "If we don't measure it, how do you manage it?"
CUSTOMER Municipality of Chatham-Kent [MUT] MANUFACTURER AysixCONTACT Tim Dickinson MODEL 3100
Chief Operator, Chatham STP SERIAL NUMBER 30S4949325 Grand Ave CLIENT TAGChatham Ontario LOCATION Chatham STPT: 519-359-3811 OTHER n/aE. [email protected]
VER. BY Randy Nichol TOLERANCE [pH] 0.05
VERIFICATION DATE Mar 12, 2019CAL. FREQUENCYCAL. DUE DATE
AS FOUND
AS LEFT
COMMENTS[QMS] INFORMATION ITEM ID #
Comparision Match to HQ30D 080200018124
Performed calibration as per manufacturers suggested technique
Chatham STP
8.7n/a
DO Concentration [mg/L] 9.3DO Concentration [%] n/a
DO Concentration [mg/L]DO Concentration [%]Barometric Pressure [hpa]
Barometric Pressure [hpa] n/aTemperature 19.1
19
AnnualMar-2020
n/aTemperature
NIST Traceable Buffers were used to confirm the overall accuracy of this instrument. "AS FOUND" readings and "AS FOUND" readings are reported within this report. A temperature device was used to measure and record the buffer temperature to correct for pH values due to the effects related to buffer temperature.
Quality Management Standards Information - Standards, reference equipment, and instrumentation used to conduct this test outlining the lot#, and expiry date is found in our current QMS document.
