Chase Pitner

79
Harvard University Graduate School of Design Master in Architecture II University of Arkansas Fay Jones School of Architecture Bachelors in Architecture CHASE PITNER

description

Harvard Graduate School of Design March II, University of Arkansas Fay Jones School of Architecture Bachelors in Architecture

Transcript of Chase Pitner

Page 1: Chase Pitner

Harvard UniversityGraduate School of DesignMaster in Architecture II

University of ArkansasFay Jones School of ArchitectureBachelors in Architecture

CHASE PITNER

Page 2: Chase Pitner

content

Content

1 Material Performance. Composite Morphologies GSD

2 Real & Imaginary Variables: Global Arenas GSD

3 UN-Finished Work III GSD

4 Push | Pull Competition

5 Superficial Spaces GSD

6 Pre-Fabricated Landscapes FJSOA

7 Modular Verticality FJSOA

8 30k Residence Competition

CHASE PITNERARCHITECTURE PORTFOLIO

Page 3: Chase Pitner

3Chase Pitner

content

Page 4: Chase Pitner

Instructor: Achim MengesFall 2014

The studio Material Performance: Composite Morphology & Fibrous Tectonics afforded the opportunity to conduct rigorous research and in-vestigation into existing and emerg-ing methods of fibrous composite material systems within architec-ture. Our investigations focused on developing a critical understand-ing of the material characteristics embedded within the carbon and glass fiber composites. Research revealed that fibrous composites systems were introduced within ar-chitectural applications in the early 1950-60’s exemplified with the col-laboration of Monsanto Chemical Company and MIT in the design and construction of the Monsanto House. The Monsanto House cap-tured the innovative potential of this material systems ability to ar-ticulate more complex geometries while tectonically yielding a high structure to weight ratio. Fibrous composites emerged as a lead-ing innovation in architectural tec-tonic and material systems in the 1950-60’s, yet has not deviated from original form based application pro-cesses in its current use today.

Material Performance:CompositeMorphologyGSD

GSD_Material Performance: Composite Morphology

Page 5: Chase Pitner

GSD

5Chase Pitner, Chris Meyer, Wenling Li

Page 6: Chase Pitner

GSD_Material Performance: Composite Morphology

Current practies have seperated the design of form and struc-ture have been separated into two separate processes, as teh architect design form, then en-gineers rationalize the structure of form.

Fibrous composite form-active structural systems challenge the current paradigm as this system has the potential to incorporate the design of material, form and structure into the thickeness of a single surface. Fibrous compos-ite systems can produce hetero-geneous surface conditions as the algorithm and scaffold have teh potential to produce various structural conditions, translu-cencies, and apertures within a single surface. No other mate-rial system is able to achieve similar capacities within a single surface.

Material Performance Fibrous Composites

Page 7: Chase Pitner

7Chase Pitner, Chris Meyer, Wenling Li

Page 8: Chase Pitner

GSD_Material Performance: Composite Morphology

Material Performance Fibrous Composites

Page 9: Chase Pitner

9Chase Pitner, Chris Meyer, Wenling Li

Page 10: Chase Pitner

GSD_Material Performance: Composite Morphology

unresolved edge condition hinge condition

Material Performance Fibrous Composites

Page 11: Chase Pitner

11Chase Pitner, Chris Meyer, Wenling Li

edge condition

foot condition

translucency

Page 12: Chase Pitner

carbon fiber surface pre matrix application

Material Performance Fibrous Composites

Page 13: Chase Pitner

form-active fibrous composite structural surfaces combine form and structure within the thickness of a single surface

13Chase Pitner, Chris Meyer, Wenling Li

form-active fibrous composite structural surface

Page 14: Chase Pitner

Material Performance Fibrous Composites

Page 15: Chase Pitner

15Chase Pitner, Chris Meyer, Wenling Li

Page 16: Chase Pitner

GSD_Material Performance: Composite Morphology

Material Performance Fibrous Composites

Page 17: Chase Pitner

17Chase Pitner, Chris Meyer, Wenling Li

Page 18: Chase Pitner

Material Performance Fibrous Composites

Page 19: Chase Pitner

19Chase Pitner, Christopher Esper

Page 20: Chase Pitner

GSD

GSD_Real & Imaginary Variables: Global Arenas

Instructor George L. LegendreSpring 2014

“Architecture depends on a prac-tical balance between real and imaginary variables: real variables depend on empirical knowledge of a given type, and programme; imaginary variables depend on the equally important (though far less intuitive) properties of indexi-cal modelling. The two parts of the equation need one another to fulfil themselves: without the imaginary part, types wither into predictabil-ity and repetition; without the real part, they become self-fulfilling and irrelevant.”

George L. Legendre

Real & Imaginary Variables:Global Arenas

Page 21: Chase Pitner

GSD

21Chase Pitner, Catherine Soderberg

Page 22: Chase Pitner

Real & Imaginary Variables Global Arenas

1:500 Scale Model: 40,000 Seat Soccer Stadium

GSD_Real & Imaginary Variables: Global Arenas. 1:500 Scale Model

Page 23: Chase Pitner

23Chase Pitner, Catherine Soderberg

Page 24: Chase Pitner

01

GSD_Real & Imaginary Variables: Global Arenas. 1:1000 Scale Context Model

Page 25: Chase Pitner

25Chase Pitner, Catherine Soderberg

Page 26: Chase Pitner

Real & Imaginary Variables Global Arenas

GSD_Real & Imaginary Variables: Global Arenas. Parametric Modulation

Page 27: Chase Pitner

04

05

06

27Chase Pitner, Catherine Soderberg

Page 28: Chase Pitner

Real & Imaginary Variables Global Arenas

GSD_Real & Imaginary Variables: Global Arenas. Structural Surface

Page 29: Chase Pitner

_ithread logic

_ithread points

_primary structural concept

_move (0,1)_move (0,-2)

ithre

ad

29Chase Pitner, Catherine Soderberg

Page 30: Chase Pitner

01

02 04

01 1:500 Concept Model 02 Structural Truss Concept 03 Section Model 04 Section Model

GSD_Real & Imaginary Variables: Global Arenas. Concept Development

Page 31: Chase Pitner

04

31Chase Pitner, Catherine Soderberg

Page 32: Chase Pitner

GSD_Real & Imaginary Variables: Global Arenas. 1:500 Scale Model

Real & Imaginary Variables Global Arenas

Page 33: Chase Pitner

Level 5

Level 4

Level 3

33Chase Pitner, Catherine Soderberg

Page 34: Chase Pitner

GSD_Real & Imaginary Variables: Global Arenas. 1:500 Scale Model

Real & Imaginary Variables Global Arenas

Page 35: Chase Pitner

35Chase Pitner, Catherine Soderberg

Page 36: Chase Pitner

GSD

GSD_UN-Finished Work III

Instructor: Ben Van Berkel

The Open Innovation Lab xAmsterdam is an open platform for innovative research that combines the three sectors of high-tech, chemical, and energy within Amster-dam. The research platform responds to a shift in paradigm from a hierarchical firm centric structure to a belief in collective creativity through a co-creation platform. Research focused on the government’s position on innovation through funding and policy. Research into Amsterdam’s innovation economy revealed disconnect between public and private sector knowl-edge clusters including universities, re-search & development, and government. The open innovation platform is an archi-tectural prototype that provides an alter-native platform for independent knowl-edge cluster to partner in co-creation. The Analysis of the Dutch Innovation Po-sition stated that the “transfer of knowl-edge from knowledge institutions through starters is a weakness of the Dutch entre-preneurial climate. In addition “the oppor-tunity to share knowledge, but also share the risks and costs of innovation are not being taken advantage of due to limited interaction between public and private research.” This prototype aims to bridge the gap between knowledge and economic bases within Amsterdam, while attracting knowledge workers from local and global universities, companies, and research in-stitutes.

UN-Finished Work III

Page 37: Chase Pitner

37Chase Pitner

GSD

Page 38: Chase Pitner

GSD_UN-Finished Work III_Aerial View

Open Innovation Lab AMSTERDAM

Page 39: Chase Pitner

39Chase Pitner

Page 40: Chase Pitner

Shift in paradigm from firm centric (hierarchical structures) to idea centric (non hierarchical structures) through emerging methods of co-creation.

COMPANIES

UNIVERSITIES

R&D INSITUTIES

GOVERNMENT

INVESTORS

RESEARCH & INNOVATIONECOSYSTEM

USE

R C

OM

MU

NIT

IES

DU

TCH

INN

OVA

TIO

N S

ECTO

RS

RES

EAR

CH

PLA

TFO

RM

AMST

ERD

AM S

CIE

NC

E &

TEC

HN

OLO

GY

CLU

STER

ARGRICULTURE & FOOD

CREATIVE INDUSTRY

HIGH-TECHINDUSTRY

LIFESCIENCES

HORTICULTURE

ENERGY

LOGISTICS

WATER

CHEMICAL INDUSTRY

ENERGY

CHEMICAL INDUSTRY

HIGH-TECHINDUSTRY

LIVING LAB

$$$

$$$$ $$

$ $ $ $ $

$ $ $ $ $ $$

$$$

The open innovation lab exists as an innovation ecosystem that serves as a platform for public and private sector knowledge clusters to

combine research efforts through a model of co-creation.

GSD_UN-Finished Work III_Research

Page 41: Chase Pitner

41Chase Pitner

ENERGY

HIGH-TECHINDUSTRY

CHEMICALINDUSTRY

CO-CREATION OPEN INNOVATION PLATFORM

KNOWLEDGE CREATIONSCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CLUSTER

INNOVATIONIDEAS, CONCEPTS, & SCENARIOS

CONSUMPTION

WORKING / PRODUCTION MODEL CO-FUNDING RESEARCH INNITIATIVES CREATE KNOWLEDGE CLUSTER INNOVATION

$

UNIVERSITY

COMPANIES

R&D INSTITUTIONS

P A T E N T

% O F P R O F I T F U N D S F U T U R E R E S E A R C H

P R O F I T I S D I V I D E D B E T W E E N P A R T I C I P A N T S

HOUSING

R E F L E C T I O N

LABORATORY

AUDITORIUM

FABRICATION

RESEARCH

ARCHIVE

LANDSCAPE

C O N T E M P L A T I O N

C O L L A B O R A T I O N

I N T E R S E C T I O NP U B L I C

C E L E B R A T I O N

HISTROIC CONTEXT

The overlay of circulation onto the existing will emerge new possibilities for the intersection, interaction and exchange of ideas within existing knowledge clusters

throughout the innovation ecosystem.

Page 42: Chase Pitner

GSD_UN-Finished Work III_Concept Model

Open Innovation Lab AMSTERDAM

Page 43: Chase Pitner

43Chase Pitner

level 3

level 4

level 5

level 6

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

OPEN TO BELOWHIGH-TECHRESEARCH CLUSTER

HIGH-TECH RESEARCH CLUSTER

CHEMICALRESEARCH CLUSTER

RESEARCH LABORATORY

LIBRARY + ARCHIVE

INTERIOR ATRIUM

ATRIUM

ATRIUM

ROOF TERRACEATRIUM

ATRIUM

INTERIOR ATRIUMLIBRARY + ARCHIVE

+ RESEARCH FELLOWSSTUDIOS

+ RESEARCH FELLOWSSTUDIOS

ATRIUM

ENERGYKNOWLEDGE CLUSTER

Page 44: Chase Pitner

GSD_UN-Finished Work III_Canal

Open Innovation Lab AMSTERDAM

Page 45: Chase Pitner

Longitudinal Section

Cross Section

45Chase Pitner

Page 46: Chase Pitner

GSD_UN-Finished Work III_Section

Page 47: Chase Pitner

47Chase Pitner

Page 48: Chase Pitner

Christopher Esper MArch I 15’Chase Pitner MArch II 15’

The nature of work is ever chang-ing. What was historically static and fixed has been transformed; har-boring, a new mode of space for a more mobile, dynamic and flexible work style -- one that fosters cross disciplinary collaboration and for-mal and informal synergies.

Recognize the primary tension be-tween the Dock’s individual identity and a level of co-dependence on other entities given this ethos, we call upon the oblique surfase as a mediator between certain program-matic tensions. Deployed here as a system of circulatory links flow-ing into presentation spaces, work spaces, and “think” spaces, the oblique surface is a zone for infor-mal and formal interaction negoti-ating a multitiude of flows and syn-ergies, and facilitating a new type of interaction amongst students, instructors and within the buildings work community.The formal and circulatory language proposed is one which seeks to tap into the cir-culation and structural language of warehouse thereby allowing people to tap into the resources and types of interaction inhereint in the inno-vation and design process.”

PUSH PULL

COMP

COMPETITION_Terra Form 2014 ONE Prize_Push | Pull

Page 49: Chase Pitner

49Chase Pitner, Christopher Esper

Page 50: Chase Pitner

publicplaymobileinformaldigital operable loud

studio

Presentation/ Pin upPin up

a secondary presentation space and fenestration reveal

eating/flex space

pinup archive/researchSeating/Lounging

faculty 1,000sf

1,000sf

Assess Wrap SplitExtend Drop PushPull Slit Activate00 11 22 33 44 55 66 77

assessing current square footage, we identify the need for borrowed space in order to meet programmatic demand. We also asses programmatic tensions.

the intervention is conceived of as the expansion and contractions of a seemingly singular continuous surface to inform programmatic zones

public v. privateplay v. thinkmobile v. fixedformal v. informaldigital v. analogueoperable v. fixedquiet v. loud v. phonecalls

due to the existing structure and as a major programmatic divide

to create a formal and informal area for seating in presentations

privatethinkfixedformalanaloguequiet

to accommodate extra necessary spaces we extend and plot tensions to mediate

pushing in plates and the exterior form create visual connections as well as programmatic zones and circulation to come. pulling down circulation gives access to community/ students-faculty

Terra Form ONE Prize Competition Push | Pull

Page 51: Chase Pitner

publicplaymobileinformaldigital operable loud

studio

Presentation/ Pin upPin up

a secondary presentation space and fenestration reveal

eating/flex space

pinup archive/researchSeating/Lounging

faculty 1,000sf

1,000sf

Assess Wrap SplitExtend Drop PushPull Slit Activate00 11 22 33 44 55 66 77

assessing current square footage, we identify the need for borrowed space in order to meet programmatic demand. We also asses programmatic tensions.

the intervention is conceived of as the expansion and contractions of a seemingly singular continuous surface to inform programmatic zones

public v. privateplay v. thinkmobile v. fixedformal v. informaldigital v. analogueoperable v. fixedquiet v. loud v. phonecalls

due to the existing structure and as a major programmatic divide

to create a formal and informal area for seating in presentations

privatethinkfixedformalanaloguequiet

to accommodate extra necessary spaces we extend and plot tensions to mediate

pushing in plates and the exterior form create visual connections as well as programmatic zones and circulation to come. pulling down circulation gives access to community/ students-faculty

51Chase Pitner, Christopher Esper

Page 52: Chase Pitner

Terra Form ONE Prize Competition Push | Pull

Page 53: Chase Pitner

pinu

p sp

ace

pinu

p sp

ace

53Chase Pitner, Christopher Esper

Page 54: Chase Pitner

Instructor George L. LegendreSpring 2014

Chase Pitner & Catherine Soderberg

SuperficialSpaces

GSD

GSD_Superficial Spaces_Parametric Modulation_MathCad

Page 55: Chase Pitner

GSD

55Chase Pitner, Catherine Soderberg

Page 56: Chase Pitner

GSD_Superficial Spaces_Parametric Modulation_MathCad

Superficial Spaces Parametric Modulation

Page 57: Chase Pitner

_elevation a

_ele

vatio

n b_

i_th

read

s

_ele

vatio

n b_

j_th

read

s

_j_thread_01

_j_thread_07

Chase Pitner

Page 58: Chase Pitner

Instructor: Michael HughesSpring 2010

Team: Chase Pitner , Josh Matthews, Addison Bliss, Jerome Tomlin, Kevin Hayer, Kelly Jackson,Ryan Wojicicki , Jack Doherty, Brad West, Lianne Collier, Nick Walker, Craig Peacock

The design and build studio was comprised of twelve fourth and fifth year students from the University of Arkansas Fay Jones School of Ar-chitecture. The Prefabricated Land-scapes Design-Build studio explored opportunities of affordable housing through modular construction. The house consists of four prefabricated modules that were designed and built by the students 190 miles north of the site in Fayetteville Arkansas. The modules were transported to the site by four flatbed trailers. The studio provided a rigorous environ-ment in which students were able to explore all aspects of the design, development, and fabrication pro-cesses.

Pre-Fabricated Landscapes Design Build

FJSOA

FJSOA_Design-Build Studio_Modular Housing

Page 59: Chase Pitner

103'

104'

105'

106'

106'

105'

104'

103'

59Chase Pitner

FJSOA

Page 60: Chase Pitner

FJSOA_Design-Build Studio_Modular Housing

Modular Housing Design Build Studio

Page 61: Chase Pitner

61Chase Pitner

Page 62: Chase Pitner

site placement of modules

FJSOA_Design-Build Studio_Modular Housing

Modular Housing Design Build Studio

Page 63: Chase Pitner

63Chase Pitner

Page 64: Chase Pitner

FJSOA_Design-Build Studio_Modular Housing

Modular Housing Design Build Studio

Page 65: Chase Pitner

65Chase Pitner

Page 66: Chase Pitner

Instructors:Marlon Blackwell & Tahar Messadi Spring 2011, Degree Project

The decline in industry and the years of excessive contamination has led the En-vironmental Protection Agency to nomi-nate the Gowanus Canal to the Nation-al Superfund List. The 300 million dollar Super Fund will provide the necessary funds for the extensive decontamina-tion process of the canals water and the surrounding brownfields. Architectur-ally, the project acts as a catalyst for the future densification of the post indus-trial area of south Brooklyn. The proj-ect challenges existing typologies of the tower through efficiencies in prefabri-cated modular construction techniques. The internal program is derived from recent shifts in the hospitality industry as travelers interests in more efficient and affordable accommodations for lodging. The concept challenges tradi-tional configuration of the hotel room by collapsing the floor are of the bed and the surrounding circulation space into one space. This concept is based on a critical understanding of efficiencies and accommodations found within the transportation industry including trains, planes, and automobiles.

Vertical ModularityA Pre-Fabricated Pod Hotel for BrooklynFJSOA

FJSOA_Design-Build Studio_Modular Housing

Page 67: Chase Pitner

tower section

67Chase Pitner

Page 68: Chase Pitner

transporation of prefabricated modules

FJSOA_Pod Hotel_Modular Tower

Page 69: Chase Pitner

69Chase Pitner

pod 1

bed

storage

corridor

pod 2 corridor

pod 3

15 ft

pod plan 15’ x 15’

pod section

Page 70: Chase Pitner

FJSOA_Pod Hotel_Modular Tower

Modular Tower Pod Hotel_Brooklyn NY

Page 71: Chase Pitner

71Chase Pitner

connect moduleto cast in place concrete core

ammenities

prefabricated modules6 modules per floor

3 rooms per module

Page 72: Chase Pitner

The wrap mediates the vertical scale of the tower and the canals edge.

FJSOA_Pod Hotel_Modular Tower

Page 73: Chase Pitner

73Chase Pitner

lighting theater wildlife vegitation

Page 74: Chase Pitner

Team: Chase Pitner & Sam Avery

The Culvert Residence is a univer-sally accessible design solution to the growing demand of single-per-son households especially for the elderly and homeless. The precast concrete includes a fly ash mixture to benefit structural integrity and durability all while reusing a waste byproduct.

The 30k house further reduces cost by eliminating costly details includ-ing the foundation, floor and wall assembly, and the roof detail. By eliminating these trades, it redis-tributes labor and material costs to other emphasis within the project and streamlines the construction process.

The resilient exterior and panelized interior reduce long-term mainte-nance costs. Maximizing the site for prevailing winds and solar orienta-tion, the culverts thick layer of insu-lation acts to both protect from the elements and create a cool, venti-lated living environment.

Building Trust International30k House Competition

COMPETITION_Building Trust International_30k House

COMP

Page 75: Chase Pitner

75Chase Pitner, Sam Avery

Page 76: Chase Pitner

ADAPTABLE HOUSING: modular living

50k House 40k House 30k House

COMPETITION_Building Trust International_30k House

30k House Competition Modular Housing

Page 77: Chase Pitner

77Chase Pitner, Sam Avery

Page 78: Chase Pitner

COMPETITION_Building Trust International_30k House

30k House Competition Modular Living

Modular Living: Transformable Wall System

configuration 1: seating configuration 2: table configuration 3: bed

Page 79: Chase Pitner

79Chase Pitner, Sam Avery

1. 2” x 8” Floor Joist2. Rigid Insulation3. Water Heater4. 1” x 4” Wood Decking5. 1/4” Cork6. 3/4” Plywood Stud Wall7. Vapor Barrier8. 4” Rigid Insulationp9. Pre-Cast Concrete Culvert

1

2

3

6

4

5

7

8

9