Charting Outcomes in the Match · final dataset. Missing data were found in the number of...

Charting Outcomes in the Match:Senior Students of U.S. DO Medical Schools

Characteristics of Senior Students of U.S. DO Medical Schools Who Matched to Their Preferred Specialty in the 2020 Main Residency Match

2nd Edition

Prepared by:National Resident Matching Programwww.nrmp.org

July 2020

Questions about the contents of this publication may be directed to National Resident Matching Program, (202) 400-2233 or [email protected].

Questions about the NRMP should be directed to Donna L. Lamb, D.HSc., M.B.A., B.S.N., President and CEO, National Resident Matching Program, (202) 400-2233 or [email protected].

Copyright ©2020 National Resident Matching Program, 2121 K Street, NW, Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20037 USA. All rights reserved. Permission to use, copy and/or distribute any documentation and/or related images from this publication shall be expressly obtained from the

NRMP.

National Resident Matching Program, Charting Outcomes in the Match: Senior Students of U.S. DO Medical Schools, 2020. National Resident Matching Program, Washington, DC 2020.

2020 Table of Contents

Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................. ii Tables and Charts for All Specialties Chart 1. Active Applicants in the 2020 Main Residency Match ............................................................................ 2 Table 1. Number of Applicants and Positions in the 2020 Main Residency Match .............................................. 3 Chart 2. Ratio of U.S. DO Seniors Ranking Specialty First/Available Positions .................................................. 4 Chart 3. Match Rates of U.S. DO Seniors ............................................................................................................ 5 Table 2. Summary Statistics on U.S. DO Seniors ................................................................................................. 6 Chart 4. Median Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. DO Seniors .................................................................... 7 Chart 5. Mean Number of Different Specialties Ranked by U.S. DO Seniors ..................................................... 8 Chart 6. COMLEX-USA Level 1 Scores of U.S. DO Seniors .............................................................................. 9 Chart 7. COMLEX-USA Level 2-CE Scores of U.S. DO Seniors ..................................................................... 10 Chart 8. USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. DO Seniors .......................................................................................... 11 Chart 9. USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. DO Seniors .................................................................................... 12 Chart 10. Mean Number of Research Experiences of U.S. DO Seniors ............................................................... 13 Chart 11. Mean Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. DO Seniors ............................... 14 Chart 12. Mean Number of Work Experiences of U.S. DO Seniors .................................................................... 15 Chart 13. Mean Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. DO Seniors .............................................................. 16 Chart 14. Percentage of U.S. DO Seniors Who Have a Graduate Degree ............................................................. 17 Tables and Charts for Individual Specialties Anesthesiology ....................................................................................................................................................... 18 Child Neurology..................................................................................................................................................... 28 Dermatology .......................................................................................................................................................... 38 Diagnostic Radiology ............................................................................................................................................. 48 Emergency Medicine ............................................................................................................................................. 58 Family Medicine .................................................................................................................................................... 68 General Surgery ..................................................................................................................................................... 78 Internal Medicine ................................................................................................................................................... 88 Internal Medicine/Pediatrics .................................................................................................................................. 98 Interventional Radiology ..................................................................................................................................... 108 Neurological Surgery ........................................................................................................................................... 118 Neurology ............................................................................................................................................................ 128 Obstetrics and Gynecology .................................................................................................................................. 138 Orthopaedic Surgery ............................................................................................................................................ 148 Otolaryngology .................................................................................................................................................... 158 Pathology ............................................................................................................................................................. 168 Pediatrics .............................................................................................................................................................. 178 Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ................................................................................................................. 188 Plastic Surgery ..................................................................................................................................................... 198 Psychiatry ............................................................................................................................................................ 208 Vascular Surgery .................................................................................................................................................. 218

iCopyright ©2020 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the written permission of the NRMP.

Charting Outcomes in the Match: U.S. DO Seniors, 2020

2020 Introduction

iiCopyright ©2020 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the written permission of the NRMP.

BackgroundThe first edition of Charting Outcomes in the Match was published in August 2006 to document how applicant qualifications affect successin the Main Residency Match®. The report was published biennially between 2007 and 2011 and was a collaboration of the NationalResident Matching Program® (NRMP®) and the Association of American Medical Colleges® (AAMC®). Match outcome data from theNRMP were combined with applicant characteristics from the AAMC’s Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS®) and United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE®) scores from the AAMC data warehouse. In 2014, NRMP added a Professional Profilesection to its Match registration process to collect USMLE scores and other applicant characteristics, and those have been used toindependently produce all subsequent Charting Outcomes in the Match reports.

Prior to 2016, the Charting Outcomes in the Match report examined the Match success of only two applicant groups: senior students from U.S. MD medical schools and independent applicants. Independent applicants included all applicant types other than U.S. MD seniors: graduates of U.S. MD medical schools, students/graduates of U.S. DO medical schools, students/graduates of Fifth Pathway programs,students/graduates of Canadian medical schools, and U.S. citizen and non-U.S. citizen students/graduates of international medical schools. Because independent applicants are a heterogeneous group, a decision was made in 2016 to report data separately for U.S. MD medical school seniors, students/graduates of U.S. DO medical schools, U.S. citizen students/graduates of international medical schools, andnon-U.S. citizen students/graduates of international medical schools. In 2018, upon requests from U.S. DO medical schools, the report on U.S. DO medical seniors/graduates was redesigned to include onlysenior students of DO medical schools (U.S. DO seniors). A U.S. DO senior is a fourth-year medical student in a U.S. osteopathic school of medicine accredited by the Commission on Osteopathic College Accreditation (COCA) with a graduation date after July 1 in the yearbefore the Match. Because DO seniors and graduates were grouped in one category, self-reported graduation dates were used to separatesenior students of DO medical schools from graduates of DO medical schools for the purposes of establishing the sample pool used in thereport. The 2020 Main Residency Match marked the completion of the transition to a single accreditation system, and DO seniors andgraduates were separated in the NRMP system into different applicant categories. This report is the second edition of the Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. DO Seniors. Because the number of U.S. DO medical school graduates is small, there is no separate reporton that group.

DataMatch success, specialty preference, and ranking information were collected through the Main Residency Match. Other applicant characteristics, including Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examinations (COMLEX-USA) Level 1 and Level 2-Cognitive Evaluation (CE) scores, USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) scores, academic degrees, publications, research, and work and volunteer experiences, were self-reported through the Professional Profile section of the NRMP’s Applicant Registration Form for the Match. To complete the form, applicants were asked to answer the questions as they did in their ERAS Common Application Form (CAF). Completion of the form was optional, and applicants who completed the form could consent or decline to participate in NRMP research. Data collection for the self-reported Professional Profile section was granted exemption by the Chesapeake (now Advarra) InstitutionalReview Board (IRB).

To ensure that COMLEX-USA and USMLE scores were not misreported, the NRMP asked DO medical schools to verify the scores oftheir senior students. In 2020, the vast majority of the COMLEX-USA Level 1 (91%) and Level 2-CE (91%) scores and USMLE Step 1 (89%) and Step 2 CK (89%) scores used in this report were verified, corrected, or supplied by U.S. DO medical schools. Because the self-reported scores are highly accurate, both verified and unverified scores were used to prepare this report: The intracorrelation coefficient (ICC) between the self-reported scores and school-verified scores was 0.996 (99% CI [0.996, 0.996]) for COMLEX-USA Level 1 scores, 0.993 (99% CI [0.992, 0.993]) for Level 2-CE scores, 0.993 (99% CI [0.992, 0.993]) for USMLE Step 1 scores, and 0.881 (99% CI [0.870, 0.892]) for Step 2 CK scores.

A total of 6,581 senior students of U.S. DO medical schools submitted certified rank order lists in the 2020 Main Residency Match. After excluding the 8.0 percent who did not give consent to participate in NRMP research, 6,055 U.S. DO senior applicants were included in thefinal dataset. Missing data were found in the number of COMLEX-USA Level 1 scores (1.0% missing), Level 2-CE scores (1.3%), USMLE Step 1 scores (39.3%), Step 2 CK scores (46.7%), research experiences (14.6%), number of abstracts, presentations, and publications (15.2%), number of work experiences (14.5%), number of volunteer experiences (14.4%), Ph.D. degree (8.6%), and other graduate degree (7.4%).


iiiCopyright ©2020 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the written permission of the NRMP.

MethodsSpecialties that offered 50 or more positions and had at least 7 matched or unmatched U.S. DO seniors preferring the specialty in the 2020 Main Residency Match are included in this report. Although Radiation Oncology offered more than 50 positions, it is excluded from this report because the numbers of both matched and unmatched U.S. DO seniors were fewer than 7. Transitional Year programs were excludedbecause they are not viewed as a preferred specialty choice.

Twelve measures are incorporated in this report: number of contiguous ranks in the preferred specialty, number of specialties ranked,COMLEX-USA Level 1 and Level 2 CE scores, USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 CK scores, numbers of research, work, and volunteer experiences, number of abstracts, presentations, and publications, and Ph.D. and other graduate degrees. The probability of matching to apreferred specialty is calculated based on COMLEX-USA Level 1 scores and contiguous ranks. Probability analyses of U.S. DO seniors matching to a preferred specialty are based on COMLEX-USA Level 1 scores of those who participated in the Match in 2018, 2019, and 2020.

It is important to note that for purposes of this report, Match success is defined as a match to the specialty of the applicant’s first-ranked program, or "preferred specialty," because that is assumed to be the specialty of choice. Lack of success includes matching to another specialty as well as failure to match at all. No distinction was made based on whether applicants matched to the first, second, third, orlower choice program.

SummarySome general observations apply to all specialties in this report. U.S. DO seniors who are successful in matching to their preferred specialty are more likely to: Rank more programs within their preferred specialty Have higher COMLEX-USA Level 1 and Level 2-CE scores Have higher USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 CK scores

Although other measures seem to be related to Match success for some specialties, the relationships are not consistent enough to drawbroad conclusions across specialties. In addition, the data sources used for Charting Outcomes in the Match do not include other importantapplicant factors such as course evaluations, reference letters, and the Medical School Performance Evaluation (MSPE).

Despite the fairly strong relationship between COMLEX-USA scores and Match success, the distributions of scores show that programdirectors consider other qualifications. A high score is not a guarantee of success, and a low score is not a bar to success. Data in this report show that some individuals with low scores are able to match to their preferred specialty, but a few people with high scores are notsuccessful. The data also are reassuring because they indicate that at least some programs do not employ an arbitrary cutoff or decline to consider applicants with less than excellent test performance.

The data in this report support the following straightforward advice one should give to an applicant: Rank all of the programs you really want, without regard to your estimate of your chances with those programs. Include a mix of both highly competitive and less competitive programs within your preferred specialty. Include all of the programs on your list where the program has expressed an interest in you and where you would accept a position. If you are applying to a competitive specialty and you want to have a residency position in the event you are unsuccessful in matching

to a program in your preferred specialty, also rank your most preferred programs in an alternate specialty. Include all of your qualifications in your application, but know that you do not have to have the highest COMLEX-USA scores, have

publications, or have participated in research projects to match successfully.

Program directors and applicants will find the tables and charts for the specialty of their particular interest later in this report.

For questions, comments or more information, please contact:National Resident Matching Program2121 K Street, NW, Suite 1000Washington, DC 20037Tel: (202) 400-2233 Email: [email protected]

2020 Introduction (continued)


Tables and Charts for All Specialties

1Copyright ©2020 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the written permission of the NRMP.


2

Chart1

Active Applicants in the 2020 Main Residency Matchby Applicant Type

Chart 1 shows the number of active applicants (applicants who submitted rank order lists of programs) by applicant type in the 2020 Main Residency Match. A total of 40,084 active applicants participated in the 2020 Main Residency Match including 6,581 U.S. DO senior students and 573 graduates of U.S. DO medical schools. Senior students of U.S. DO medical schools constituted 16.4 percent of all applicants in the Match.

5,167

U.S. CitizenStudents/Graduates

of InternationalMedical Schools

573

Graduates of U.S. DOMedical Schools

1,519

Graduates of U.S. MDMedical Schools

6,907

Non-U.S. CitizenStudents/Graduates ofInternational Medical

Schools

6,581

Senior students of U.S.DO Medical Schools

19,326

Senior students of U.S.MD Medical Schools

11

Students/Graduates ofCanadian MedicalSchools and Fifth

Pathway Programs

Copyright ©2020 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the written permission of the NRMP.


3

Table1

Number of Applicants and Positions in the 2020 Main Residency Matchby Preferred Specialty*

Table 1 provides a summary of the numbers of applicants and positions for specialties that offered at least 50 positions inthe Match and were preferred by at least 7 U.S. DO seniors. For example, a total of 2,339 applicants preferredAnesthesiology (or ranked an Anesthesiology position first), among whom 408 were U.S. DO seniors (321 matched and 87did not match to Anesthesiology). For each of the 1,884 Anesthesiology positions offered, there were 1.24 applicants who preferred the specialty.

For those specialties offering both PGY-1 and PGY-2 positions (including Physician (R) positions), all position types havebeen combined.

TotalPositionsOfferedPreferred Specialty

TotalNumber of

All Applicants

Number ofAll ApplicantsPer Position Matched

NotMatched

Number of U.S. DO Senior Applicants

Total

Anesthesiology 1,884 2,339 1.24 321 87 408

Child Neurology 193 193 1.00 20 2 22

Dermatology 538 692 1.29 41 17 58

Diagnostic Radiology 1,146 1,232 1.08 156 14 170

Emergency Medicine 2,665 3,115 1.17 671 137 808

Family Medicine 4,662 4,913 1.05 1,281 84 1365

General Surgery 1,536 2,183 1.42 189 84 273

Internal Medicine 9,127 10,996 1.20 1,349 107 1456

Internal Medicine/Pediatrics 390 445 1.14 35 5 40

Interventional Radiology 156 199 1.28 15 7 22

Neurological Surgery 232 383 1.65 3 12 15

Neurology 946 1,068 1.13 118 9 127

Obstetrics and Gynecology 1,443 1,873 1.30 220 88 308

Orthopaedic Surgery 849 1,177 1.39 112 60 172

Otolaryngology 350 493 1.41 17 13 30

Pathology 603 748 1.24 64 5 69

Pediatrics 2,956 3,102 1.05 480 21 501

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 480 591 1.23 174 37 211

Plastic Surgery 180 282 1.57 0 12 12

Psychiatry 1,858 2,486 1.34 332 66 398

Vascular Surgery 75 122 1.63 5 4 9

* Preferred specialty is the specialty of the first-ranked program on an applicant's rank order list, excluding preliminary programs in specialties.Source: NRMP Data Warehouse.



4

Chart2

Ratio of U.S. DO Seniors Ranking Specialty First / Available Positionsby Preferred Specialty

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

Anesth

esiol

ogy

Child

Neuro

logy

Derm

atolo

gy

Diagno

stic R

adiol

ogy

Emer

genc

y Med

icine

Family

Med

icine

Gener

al Sur

gery

Inte

rnal

Med

icine

Inte

rnal

Med

icine

/Ped

iatric

s

Inte

rven

tiona

l Rad

iolog

y

Neuro

logica

l Sur

gery

Neuro

logy

Obste

trics

and

Gyn

ecolo

gy

Orthop

aedic

Sur

gery

Otolar

yngo

logy

Patho

logy

Pediat

rics

Physic

al M

edici

ne a

nd R

ehab

ilitat

ion

Plastic

Sur

gery

Psych

iatry

Vascu

lar S

urge

ry

1.00.9

1.2

0.9 0.90.8

1.2

1.1 1.01.1

1.6

1.01.1

1.21.3

1.1

0.90.8

1.5

1.1

1.5

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.20.3

0.3

0.2

0.20.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.20.2 0.1

0.1

0.2

0.4

0.1

0.2

0.1

DO Seniors All Other Applicants

Source: NRMP Data Warehouse


Chart 2 shows the ratios of U.S. DO seniors and all applicants who preferred each specialty to available positions in that specialty. For all specialties displayed in the chart except Child Neurology, the total number of applicants preferring each specialty was more than the number of available positions. Among all specialties in the chart, Neurological Surgery had thehighest ratio of all applicants per position; however, the highest ratio for U.S. DO seniors was in Physical Medicine andRehabilitation.


5

Chart3

Match Rates of U.S. DO SeniorsPercent Matched by Preferred Specialty

0

20

40

60

80

100

Anesth

esiol

ogy

Child

Neuro

logy

Derm

atolo

gy

Diagno

stic R

adiol

ogy

Emer

genc

y Med

icine

Family

Med

icine

Gener

al Sur

gery

Inte

rnal

Med

icine

Inte

rnal

Med

icine

/Ped

iatric

s

Inte

rven

tiona

l Rad

iolog

y

Neuro

logica

l Sur

gery

Neuro

logy

Obste

trics

and

Gyn

ecolo

gy

Orthop

aedic

Sur

gery

Otolar

yngo

logy

Patho

logy

Pediat

rics

Physic

al M

edici

ne a

nd R

ehab

ilitat

ion

Plastic

Sur

gery

Psych

iatry

Vascu

lar S

urge

ry

78.7

90.9

70.7

91.8

83.0

93.8

69.2

92.787.5

68.2

20.0

92.9

71.465.1

56.7

92.895.8

82.5 83.4

55.6


Chart 3 shows the percentages of U.S. DO seniors who matched to their preferred specialty. Overall, 86.6 percent of U.S. DO seniors matched to their preferred specialty, ranging from a high of 95.8 percent (Pediatrics) to a low of 20.0 percent (Neurological Surgery). No U.S. DO seniors who preferred Plastic Surgery matched in the specialty.



6

Table2

Summary Statistics on U.S. DO SeniorsAll Specialties Combined

Measure (n=5,243) (n=786)

Matched Not Matched

1. 10.6 4.3Mean number of contiguous ranks

2. 1.2 1.6Mean number of distinct specialties ranked

3. 542 511Mean COMLEX-USA Level 1 score

4. 575 531Mean COMLEX-USA Level 2-CE score

5. 228 223Mean USMLE Step 1 score

6. 240 233Mean USMLE Step 2 CK score

7. 1.9 2.0Mean number of research experiences

8. 2.9 3.0Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications

9. 3.6 3.6Mean number of work experiences

10. 7.0 6.1Mean number of volunteer experiences

11. 0.4 1.0Percentage who have a Ph.D. degree

12. 22.8 28.5Percentage who have another graduate degree

Sources: NRMP Data Warehouse


Table 2 provides summary statistics for all specialties by Match outcome on the 12 measures presented in this report. Data on each of these measures are displayed graphically by preferred specialty on the following pages. Only U.S. DO seniors who gave consent to use their information in research are included in this table and the rest of the report.


7

Chart4

Median Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. DO Seniorsby Preferred Specialty and Match Status

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Anesth

esiol

ogy

Child

Neuro

logy

Derm

atolo

gy

Diagno

stic R

adiol

ogy

Emer

genc

y Med

icine

Family

Med

icine

Gener

al Sur

gery

Inte

rnal

Med

icine

Inte

rnal

Med

icine

/Ped

iatric

s

Inte

rven

tiona

l Rad

iolog

y

Neuro

logica

l Sur

gery

Neuro

logy

Obste

trics

and

Gyn

ecolo

gy

Orthop

aedic

Sur

gery

Otolar

yngo

logy

Patho

logy

Pediat

rics

Physic

al M

edici

ne a

nd R

ehab

ilitat

ion

Plastic

Sur

gery

Psych

iatry

Vascu

lar S

urge

ry

10

8 8

1110

1110

1110

2 2

1110

5

910

12 12

10

15

4

2 2 2

4

23 3

1 1

34 4

34

32

5

23

1

Matched Not Matched


In general, applicants are more likely to be successful if they rank more programs in their desired specialty. To quantify thisaspect of applicant behavior, we tallied the number of programs ranked in the first-choice specialty before a program inanother specialty appeared on the applicant's rank order list (contiguous ranks).

Chart 4 displays the median number of contiguous ranks by preferred specialty for U.S. DO seniors who did and did not matchto their preferred specialty. Both groups show variation across specialties. For all specialties except Neurological Surgery,U.S. DO seniors who matched to their preferred specialty had median contiguous rank lists that were longer than those whodid not match. No U.S. DO seniors who preferred Plastic Surgery matched in the specialty.

The principal message of this chart is that applicants with longer rank order lists are more successful than those with shorterrank order lists. Some applicants submit shorter rank order lists because they find only a few programs willing to entertaintheir applications or because they cannot afford a large number of interview trips.



8

Chart5

Mean Number of Different Specialties Ranked by U.S. DO Seniorsby Preferred Specialty and Match Status

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

Anesth

esiol

ogy

Child

Neuro

logy

Derm

atolo

gy

Diagno

stic R

adiol

ogy

Emer

genc

y Med

icine

Family

Med

icine

Gener

al Sur

gery

Inte

rnal

Med

icine

Inte

rnal

Med

icine

/Ped

iatric

s

Inte

rven

tiona

l Rad

iolog

y

Neuro

logica

l Sur

gery

Neuro

logy

Obste

trics

and

Gyn

ecolo

gy

Orthop

aedic

Sur

gery

Otolar

yngo

logy

Patho

logy

Pediat

rics

Physic

al M

edici

ne a

nd R

ehab

ilitat

ion

Plastic

Sur

gery

Psych

iatry

Vascu

lar S

urge

ry

1.6 1.

7

2.0

1.6

1.2

1.1 1.

2

1.1

1.6

2.0

1.7

1.2

1.2

1.2

1.5

1.2

1.1

1.7

1.3

1.6

1.9

1.5

2.2 2.

4

1.5

1.4

1.3 1.

5

2.0

2.7

1.9

1.3 1.

5 1.6

1.5

1.8

1.8

2.1

2.0

1.4

2.5

Matched Not Matched


Some applicants are interested in a single specialty while others consider two or more. Chart 5 displays the average numberof different specialties ranked by preferred specialty and Match outcome. With the exception of Child Neurology andOtolaryngology, U.S. DO seniors who matched to their preferred specialty ranked fewer specialties than those who did notmatch. No U.S. DO seniors who preferred Plastic Surgery matched in the specialty.



9

Chart6

400

500

600

700

800

Anesth

esiol

ogy

Child

Neuro

logy

Derm

atolo

gy

Diagno

stic R

adiol

ogy

Emer

genc

y Med

icine

Family

Med

icine

Gener

al Sur

gery

Inte

rnal

Med

icine

Inte

rnal

Med

icine

/Ped

iatric

s

Inte

rven

tiona

l Rad

iolog

y

Neuro

logica

l Sur

gery

Neuro

logy

Obste

trics

and

Gyn

ecolo

gy

Orthop

aedic

Sur

gery

Otolar

yngo

logy

Patho

logy

Pediat

rics

Physic

al M

edici

ne a

nd R

ehab

ilitat

ion

Plastic

Sur

gery

Psych

iatry

Vascu

lar S

urge

ry

Source:NRMP Data Warehouse

COMLEX-USA Level 1 Scores of U.S. DO Seniorsby Preferred Specialty and Match Status

The Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examinations (COMLEX-USA) are required for graduation from a U.S. DO medical school. The COMLEX-USA examination series is designed to assess the osteopathic medical knowledge andclinical skills considered essential for osteopathic generalist physicians to practice osteopathic medicine. COMLEX-USA isconstructed in the context of clinical problem-solving that involves "Patient Presentations" and "Physician Tasks." COMLEX-USA Level 1 integrates the foundational and basic biomedical sciences of anatomy, behavioral science,biochemistry, genetics, microbiology, immunology, osteopathic principles, pathology, pharmacology, physiology and otherareas of medical knowledge as they are relevant to solving clinical problems and promoting and maintaining health inproviding osteopathic medical care to patients. Passing COMLEX-USA Level 1 is required for graduation with the Doctor ofOsteopathic Medicine (DO) degree in the United States, and COMLEX-USA is used for licensure for DOs in all 50 states. Overall, U.S. DO seniors who matched to their preferred specialty had mean COMLEX-USA Level 1 scores of 542.0 (s.d. = 80.9), well above the 2020 minimum passing score of 400. COMLEX-USA Level 1 scores were available for 99 percent ofU.S. DO seniors.

Chart 6 displays the COMLEX-USA Level 1 scores for U.S. DO seniors by specialty and match status. The horizontal bars are the median values and the vertical lines show the interquartile ranges (IQR, the range of scores for applicants excludingthe top and bottom quarters of the distribution). Unusually wide and unusually narrow IQRs often indicate small sample sizes.

For most specialties the IQRs of U.S. DO seniors who matched to their preferred specialties were higher than those who didnot match. The IQRs of unmatched U.S DO seniors overlapped or surpassed that of the matched U.S. DO seniors for Neurological Surgery, but the sample sizes for that specialty is small (3 matched and 12 not matched). No U.S. DO seniors who preferred Plastic Surgery matched in the specialty.


Matched Not Matched


400

500

600

700

800

Anesth

esiol

ogy

Child

Neuro

logy

Derm

atolo

gy

Diagno

stic R

adiol

ogy

Emer

genc

y Med

icine

Family

Med

icine

Gener

al Sur

gery

Inte

rnal

Med

icine

Inte

rnal

Med

icine

/Ped

iatric

s

Inte

rven

tiona

l Rad

iolog

y

Neuro

logica

l Sur

gery

Neuro

logy

Obste

trics

and

Gyn

ecolo

gy

Orthop

aedic

Sur

gery

Otolar

yngo

logy

Patho

logy

Pediat

rics

Physic

al M

edici

ne a

nd R

ehab

ilitat

ion

Plastic

Sur

gery

Psych

iatry

Vascu

lar S

urge

ry

Sources: COMLEX scores provided by NBOME. Match outcomes from NRMP Data Warehouse

10

Chart7

COMLEX-USA Level 2-CE Scores of U.S. DO Seniorsby Preferred Specialty and Match Status

The COMLEX-USA Level 2-Cognitive Evaluation (CE) integrates the clinical disciplines of Emergency Medicine, Family Medicine, Internal Medicine, Obstetrics/Gynecology, Osteopathic Principles and Neuromusculoskeletal Medicine, Pediatrics, Psychiatry, Surgery, and other areas relevant to solving clinical problems and promoting and maintaining healthin providing osteopathic medical care to patients. Passing COMLEX-USA Level 2-CE is required for graduation with the DO degree in the United States, and COMLEX-USA is used for licensure for DOs in all 50 states. Overall, U.S. DO seniors who matched to their preferred specialty had mean COMLEX-USA Level 2-CE scores of 574.6 (s.d. = 88.2), well above the 2020 minimum passing score of 400. COMLEX-USA Level 2-CE scores were available for 98 percent of U.S. DO seniors who participated in the Main Residency Match.

Chart 7 shows the COMLEX-USA Level 2-CE scores for U.S. DO seniors by preferred specialty and match status. The horizontal bars are the median values and the vertical lines show the interquartile ranges (IQRs). Unusually wide and unusually narrow IQRs often indicate small sample sizes.

As with the Level 1 scores, for most specialties the IQRs of U.S. DO seniors who matched to their preferred specialties werehigher than those who did not match. Unmatched U.S. DO seniors had higher median scores than their matched counterparts in Neurological Surgery, but both sample sizes are small. No U.S. DO seniors who preferred Plastic Surgery matched in the specialty.


Matched Not Matched


Chart8

USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. DO Seniorsby Preferred Specialty and Match Status

USMLE Step 1 scores are a measure of a student’s understanding of important basic science concepts and the ability to apply that knowledge to the practice of medicine. Although such knowledge is only one facet of applicant qualifications considered by program directors in their selection process, a Step 1 score is the only qualification that is universallyavailable for all applicant types during the interview season and prior to the NRMP’s ranking deadline.

It is important to note that not all U.S. DO seniors took the USMLE or reported the scores to the NRMP. Step 1 scores were available for only 60.7 percent of U.S. DO seniors who gave consent to research. Overall, U.S. DO seniors who matched totheir preferred specialty had mean USMLE Step 1 scores of 227.7 (s.d. = 15.4) well above the 2020 minimum passing score of 194.

Chart 8 displays the Step 1 scores for U.S. DO seniors by specialty and match status. The horizontal bars are the median values for successful applicants and the vertical lines show the interquartile ranges (IQRs). Unusually wide and unusually narrow IQRs often indicate small sample sizes. Examples can be found in Child Neurology, Neurological Surgery, PlasticSurgery, and Vascular Surgery. For almost all specialties but Otolaryngology and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, theIQR of U.S. DO seniors who matched to their preferred specialties was higher than those who did not match.


Matched Not Matched

180

190

200

210

220

230

240

250

260

270

Anesth

esiol

ogy

Child

Neuro

logy

Derm

atolo

gy

Diagno

stic R

adiol

ogy

Emer

genc

y Med

icine

Family

Med

icine

Gener

al Sur

gery

Inte

rnal

Med

icine

Inte

rnal

Med

icine

/Ped

iatric

s

Inte

rven

tiona

l Rad

iolog

y

Neuro

logica

l Sur

gery

Neuro

logy

Obste

trics

and

Gyn

ecolo

gy

Orthop

aedic

Sur

gery

Otolar

yngo

logy

Patho

logy

Pediat

rics

Physic

al M

edici

ne a

nd R

ehab

ilitat

ion

Plastic

Sur

gery

Psych

iatry

Vascu

lar S

urge

ry

Source:NRMP Data Warehouse



Chart9

USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. DO Seniorsby Preferred Specialty and Match Status

USMLE Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) scores are a measure of an applicant's ability to apply the medical knowledge, skills, and understanding of clinical science essential for providing patient care. Step 2 CK scores were available for only53.3 percent of U.S. DO seniors who gave consent to research. Overall, U.S. DO seniors who matched to their preferred specialty had mean USMLE Step 2 CK scores of 240.5 (s.d. = 13.4) well above the 2020 minimum passing score of 209.

Chart 9 shows the Step 2 CK scores for U.S. DO seniors by preferred specialty and match status. The horizontal bars are the median values for successful applicants and the vertical lines show the interquartile ranges (IQRs). Unusually wide and unusually narrow IQRs often indicate small sample sizes. Examples can be found in specialties such as Child Neurology,Pathology, Plastic Surgery, and Vascular Surgery. As with the Step 1 scores, the more competitive specialties have higheraverage Step 2 CK scores, but the overall variation is smaller. For most specialties, the IQR of U.S. DO seniors who matched to their preferred specialties was higher than those who did not match.

Matched Not Matched

180

190

200

210

220

230

240

250

260

270

Anesth

esiol

ogy

Child

Neuro

logy

Derm

atolo

gy

Diagno

stic R

adiol

ogy

Emer

genc

y Med

icine

Family

Med

icine

Gener

al Sur

gery

Inte

rnal

Med

icine

Inte

rnal

Med

icine

/Ped

iatric

s

Inte

rven

tiona

l Rad

iolog

y

Neuro

logica

l Sur

gery

Neuro

logy

Obste

trics

and

Gyn

ecolo

gy

Orthop

aedic

Sur

gery

Otolar

yngo

logy

Patho

logy

Pediat

rics

Physic

al M

edici

ne a

nd R

ehab

ilitat

ion

Plastic

Sur

gery

Psych

iatry

Vascu

lar S

urge

ry

Sources: COMLEX scores provided by NBOME. Match outcomes from NRMP Data Warehouse


13

Chart10

Mean Number of Research Experiences of U.S. DO Seniorsby Preferred Specialty and Match Status

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

Anesth

esiol

ogy

Child

Neuro

logy

Derm

atolo

gy

Diagno

stic R

adiol

ogy

Emer

genc

y Med

icine

Family

Med

icine

Gener

al Sur

gery

Inte

rnal

Med

icine

Inte

rnal

Med

icine

/Ped

iatric

s

Inte

rven

tiona

l Rad

iolog

y

Neuro

logica

l Sur

gery

Neuro

logy

Obste

trics

and

Gyn

ecolo

gy

Orthop

aedic

Sur

gery

Otolar

yngo

logy

Patho

logy

Pediat

rics

Physic

al M

edici

ne a

nd R

ehab

ilitat

ion

Plastic

Sur

gery

Psych

iatry

Vascu

lar S

urge

ry

1.8

2.4

4.7

2.1

1.5

1.5

2.7

1.9 2.

1

3.7

3.0

2.5

2.2

3.3

4.4

2.0

1.8 2.

2

2.0

3.8

1.8

2.5 2.

7

1.4 1.

8

1.5

2.0

2.0

2.8

2.4

3.0

1.4

1.9

2.5 2.

7

0.7

2.1

2.0

3.5

1.3

3.5

Matched Not Matched


Applicants were asked to report the number of research experiences they entered in their Electronic Residency ApplicationService (ERAS) applications. The experiences are not verified or evaluated and quality may vary greatly. Chart 10 shows the average number of research experiences by preferred specialty and Match outcome. U.S. DO seniors averaged 1.9 research experiences, with 69.4 percent reporting at least one research experience. The average numbers of researchexperiences were higher for matched U.S. DO seniors among competitive specialties such as Dermatology, OrthopaedicSurgery, Otolaryngology, and General Surgery. However, except for Orthopaedic Surgery, the other three specialties hadsmall sample sizes.



0.0

4.0

8.0

12.0

16.0

20.0

24.0

Anesth

esiol

ogy

Child

Neuro

logy

Derm

atolo

gy

Diagno

stic R

adiol

ogy

Emer

genc

y Med

icine

Family

Med

icine

Gener

al Sur

gery

Inte

rnal

Med

icine

Inte

rnal

Med

icine

/Ped

iatric

s

Inte

rven

tiona

l Rad

iolog

y

Neuro

logica

l Sur

gery

Neuro

logy

Obste

trics

and

Gyn

ecolo

gy

Orthop

aedic

Sur

gery

Otolar

yngo

logy

Patho

logy

Pediat

rics

Physic

al M

edici

ne a

nd R

ehab

ilitat

ion

Plastic

Sur

gery

Psych

iatry

Vascu

lar S

urge

ry

2.5

4.6

7.3

3.0

2.2

2.1 3.

6

2.8 3.3

6.9

11.5

3.5

3.1

6.7

11.2

2.8

2.8

3.1

3.1

21.3

2.4

7.0

4.6

3.7

1.9

2.0

4.1

2.1

4.0 5.

1 6.6

2.3 2.9

5.4

2.9

0.7 2.

6

2.0

11.8

1.5

6.5

Matched Not Matched


14

Chart11

Mean Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. DO Seniorsby Preferred Specialty and Match Status

Applicants were asked to list the number of abstracts, presentations, and publications they reported in their ERASapplications. This information is self-reported and may include peer-reviewed articles, abstracts, poster sessions, and invited national or regional presentations. Some residency programs may independently verify and even review publications forapplicants in whom they have an interest, but most probably do not.

Many applicants report abstracts, presentations, or publications, sometimes dozens or even hundreds. In the individual specialty sections, we distinguish between no publications, 1 to 5 publications, and more than 5 publications. Chart 11shows the mean number of publications by preferred specialty and Match outcome.

More than half of U.S. DO seniors (59.1%) reported at least one publication, with an average of 2.9 publications per applicant. Matched U.S. DO seniors reported more publications in most specialties, with the exceptions of Child Neurology, Diagnostic Radiology, General Surgery, and Internal Medicine/Pediatrics. There are large gaps between the reportednumbers of publications by matched and unmatched U.S. DO seniors for Neurological Surgery, Otolaryngology, and Vascular Surgery, but the numbers of U.S. DO seniors who preferred those specialties are small and the means are easily skewed.



15

Chart12

Mean Number of Work Experiences of U.S. DO Seniorsby Preferred Specialty and Match Status

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

Anesth

esiol

ogy

Child

Neuro

logy

Derm

atolo

gy

Diagno

stic R

adiol

ogy

Emer

genc

y Med

icine

Family

Med

icine

Gener

al Sur

gery

Inte

rnal

Med

icine

Inte

rnal

Med

icine

/Ped

iatric

s

Inte

rven

tiona

l Rad

iolog

y

Neuro

logica

l Sur

gery

Neuro

logy

Obste

trics

and

Gyn

ecolo

gy

Orthop

aedic

Sur

gery

Otolar

yngo

logy

Patho

logy

Pediat

rics

Physic

al M

edici

ne a

nd R

ehab

ilitat

ion

Plastic

Sur

gery

Psych

iatry

Vascu

lar S

urge

ry

3.5

3.5

3.3

3.1

3.7

3.5 3.6 3.

8

3.8 3.9

4.5

3.1 3.

4

4.2

3.9

3.8

3.3 3.

6

3.2

6.0

3.4

1.5

5.3

3.5 3.

9

3.2

4.5

3.7

3.5

2.6 2.

8

4.2

3.0

3.7

3.4

1.3

4.2

2.5

4.9

2.9

2.0

Matched Not Matched


Applicants were asked to list the number of work experiences they reported in their ERAS applications. Chart 12 shows the mean number of work experiences by preferred specialty and Match outcome. U.S. DO seniors averaged 3.6 work experiences, with 81.0 percent reporting at least one work experience. There is no discernable pattern between matched andunmatched U.S. DO seniors across specialties.



16

Chart13

Mean Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. DO Seniorsby Preferred Specialty and Match Status

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

Anesth

esiol

ogy

Child

Neuro

logy

Derm

atolo

gy

Diagno

stic R

adiol

ogy

Emer

genc

y Med

icine

Family

Med

icine

Gener

al Sur

gery

Inte

rnal

Med

icine

Inte

rnal

Med

icine

/Ped

iatric

s

Inte

rven

tiona

l Rad

iolog

y

Neuro

logica

l Sur

gery

Neuro

logy

Obste

trics

and

Gyn

ecolo

gy

Orthop

aedic

Sur

gery

Otolar

yngo

logy

Patho

logy

Pediat

rics

Physic

al M

edici

ne a

nd R

ehab

ilitat

ion

Plastic

Sur

gery

Psych

iatry

Vascu

lar S

urge

ry

6.4

7.5

7.5

5.8

6.7 7.0 7.2

6.9

7.9

6.5

5.5

6.7

8.8

7.1

7.2

5.1

8.3

7.7

6.4

5.5

4.6

11.5

7.1

5.0 5.

5 5.8

6.7

5.6 5.8

5.3

9.9

2.4

7.4

5.9

5.8

2.7

8.7

6.8

10.0

5.0

5.0

Matched Not Matched


Applicants were asked to list the number of volunteer experiences they reported in their ERAS applications. Chart 13 displays the mean number of volunteer experiences by preferred specialty and Match outcome. Matched U.S. DO seniors in most specialties averaged more volunteer experiences when compared to their unmatched counterparts. Large gaps betweenmatched and not matched U.S. DO seniors can be found in specialties such as Child Neurology, Neurological Surgery, andNeurology. However, those specialties have small sample sizes in one or both groups. The majority (84.6%) of U.S. DO seniors reported at least one volunteer experience, with an average of 6.9 volunteer experiences for all U.S. DO seniors.



17

Chart 14 shows by preferred specialty and match status the percentage of U.S. DO seniors who have a Ph.D. and/or other graduate degrees. Very few U.S. DO seniors had a Ph.D. degree. With the exception of Family Medicine and OrthopaedicSurgery, a smaller percentage of U.S. DO seniors who matched to their preferred specialty had another graduate degree compared to their unmatched counterparts. No unmatched U.S. DO seniors in Child Neurology, Neurological Surgery, and Pathology reported any data for analysis. No U.S. DO seniors who preferred Plastic Surgery matched in the specialty.

Chart14

Percentage of U.S. DO Seniors Who Have a Graduate Degreeby Preferred Specialty and Match Status

020406080

100

Anesth

esiol

ogy

Child

Neuro

logy

Derm

atolo

gy

Diagno

stic R

adiol

ogy

Emer

genc

y Med

icine

Family

Med

icine

Gener

al Sur

gery

Inte

rnal

Med

icine

Inte

rnal

Med

icine

/Ped

iatric

s

Inte

rven

tiona

l Rad

iolog

y

Neuro

logica

l Sur

gery

Neuro

logy

Obste

trics

and

Gyn

ecolo

gy

Orthop

aedic

Sur

gery

Otolar

yngo

logy

Patho

logy

Pediat

rics

Physic

al M

edici

ne a

nd R

ehab

ilitat

ion

Plastic

Sur

gery

Psych

iatry

Vascu

lar S

urge

ry

1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 00 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0

Matched Not Matched

0

20

40

60

80

100

Anesth

esiol

ogy

Child

Neuro

logy

Derm

atolo

gy

Diagno

stic R

adiol

ogy

Emer

genc

y Med

icine

Family

Med

icine

Gener

al Sur

gery

Inte

rnal

Med

icine

Inte

rnal

Med

icine

/Ped

iatric

s

Inte

rven

tiona

l Rad

iolog

y

Neuro

logica

l Sur

gery

Neuro

logy

Obste

trics

and

Gyn

ecolo

gy

Orthop

aedic

Sur

gery

Otolar

yngo

logy

Patho

logy

Pediat

rics

Physic

al M

edici

ne a

nd R

ehab

ilitat

ion

Plastic

Sur

gery

Psych

iatry

Vascu

lar S

urge

ry

19 19 14 16 19 23 25 25 26 3350

30 25 23 18 22 23 23 21 2521

018

5032

23 29 29

50 57

0

38 3321 20

0

35 28

50

27

50

Matched Not Matched


Ph.D.

Other Graduate Degrees



AN Anesthesiology


18 Charting Outcomes in the Match: U.S. DO Seniors, 2020

Table AN-1

Summary Statistics on U.S. DO SeniorsAnesthesiology

Measure (n=302) (n=79)

Matched Unmatched

11.1 4.7Mean number of contiguous ranks1.

1.6 1.9Mean number of distinct specialties ranked2.

590 517Mean COMLEX-USA Level 1 score3.

625 530Mean COMLEX-USA Level 2-CE score4.

233 221Mean USMLE Step 1 score5.

243 230Mean USMLE Step 2 CK score6.

1.8 1.8Mean number of research experiences7.

2.5 2.4Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications8.

3.5 3.4Mean number of work experiences9.

6.4 4.6Mean number of volunteer experiences10.

0.7 0.0Percentage who have a Ph.D. degree11.

19.0 21.3Percentage who have another graduate degree12.

Source: NRMP Data Warehouse.Note: Only U.S. DO seniors who gave consent to use their information in research are included.



0

40

80

120

160

200

1 2 3 4 or More

186

65

43

7

29 34

124

Matched Not Matched

Distinct Specialties Ranked

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 orMore

49 8 10

18 16 1723 23 24

21 2219

14 12

62

19

9 10 106 7

3 41 2 1 3

0 03 1

Matched Not Matched

Contiguous Ranks

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Chart AN-2

Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. DO SeniorsAnesthesiology



20

Chart AN-1

Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. DO SeniorsAnesthesiology


Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous RanksAnesthesiology

Graph AN-1

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Number of Contiguous Ranks

Probability of Matching

Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2018-2020 applicants.

21Copyright ©2020 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the written permission of the NRMP. Charting Outcomes in the Match:

U.S. DO Seniors, 2020

Chart AN-3

COMLEX-USA Level 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsAnesthesiology

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

<= 400 Between 401and 450

Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

0

8

21

59

7479

42

12

4 1 20

11

25

17 18

51 1 0 0 1

MatchedNot Matched

COMLEX-USA Level 1 Scores

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts



Chart AN-4

COMLEX-USA Level 2-CE Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsAnesthesiology

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

0 2

13

34

6975

61

32

6 73

05

2025

19

8

0 0 0 0 2

MatchedNot Matched

COMLEX-USA Level 2-CE Scores

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Graph AN-2

Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by COMLEX-USA Level 1 ScoreAnesthesiology

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850

COMLEX-USA Level 1 Score





Chart AN-5

USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsAnesthesiology

Chart AN-6

USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsAnesthesiology

0

20

40

60

80

100


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

0 0 2

13

42

59

87

56

19

1

23

0 0 4 8

20 16 122 0 0

17

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

20

40

60

80

100


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

0 0 0 19

36

68

81

61

17

29

0 0 0 210

23

13 11

0 0

20

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts




0

20

40

60

80

100

None 1 2 3 4 5 or More

98

4336

2316

55

25

146 3 3

12

Matched Not Matched

Publications

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lica

nts

0

20

40

60

80

100


55

83

69

34

201415 16 14 12

15

MatchedNot Matched

Research Projects

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

tsChart AN-7

Number of Research Projects of U.S. DO SeniorsAnesthesiology



Chart AN-8

Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. DO SeniorsAnesthesiology


0

10

20

30

40

50

None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More

2

8

18

31

4440

2522

1813

47

25 5

11 12

48 6

1 15

Matched Not Matched

Volunteer Experiences

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70


11

27

51

66

53

64

37

10 12 13 14

MatchedNot Matched

Work Experiences

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

tsChart AN-9

Number of Work Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsAnesthesiology



Chart AN-10

Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsAnesthesiology


Chart AN-11

Other Characteristics of U.S. DO SeniorsAnesthesiology


Source: NRMP Data Warehouse.

27

0

40

80

120

160

200

240

280

320

Yes No

2

300

0

79

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Ph.D. Degree

0

40

80

120

160

200

240

280

Yes No

54

248

16

63

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Other Graduate Degree

Matched Not Matched


CN Child Neurology



Table CN-1

Summary Statistics on U.S. DO SeniorsChild Neurology


Matched Unmatched
















0

2

4

6

8

10

1 2 3 4 or More

7

10

0

11 1

0 0

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

1

2

3

4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 orMore

1

2

0 0

2 2

0

3

1 1 1 1 1 1

2

00

2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Matched Not Matched

Contiguous Ranks

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Chart CN-2

Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. DO SeniorsChild Neurology



30

Chart CN-1

Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. DO SeniorsChild Neurology


Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous RanksChild Neurology

Graph CN-1

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20






Chart CN-3

COMLEX-USA Level 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsChild Neurology

0

1

2

3

4

5


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

0

2

1

5 5 5

0 0 0 0 00

1

0

1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts



Chart CN-4

COMLEX-USA Level 2-CE Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsChild Neurology

0

1

2

3

4

5


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

0 0

2

5

3

5

3

0 0 0 00

1

0 0 0

1

0 0 0 0 0

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Graph CN-2

Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by COMLEX-USA Level 1 ScoreChild Neurology

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 720






Chart CN-5

USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsChild Neurology

Chart CN-6

USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsChild Neurology

0

1

2

3

4

5

6


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

0 0 0 0

3

4

2

3

0 0

6

0 0 0

1

0 0 0 0 0 0

1

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

1

2

3

4

5

6


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

0 0 0 0

1

3 3 3

2

0

6

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1

0 0

1

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts




0

1

2

3

4

5

6


2

1

5

1

2

6

0 0 0 0 0

2

Matched Not Matched

Publications

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lica

nts

0

1

2

3

4

5


2 2

4

3

5

00

1

0 0

1

0

MatchedNot Matched

Research Projects

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Chart CN-7

Number of Research Projects of U.S. DO SeniorsChild Neurology



Chart CN-8

Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. DO SeniorsChild Neurology


0

1

2

3

4

5

None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More

0 0 0 0

2

5

1

2

0 0

5

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1

0

1

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

1

2

3

4

5


0

2

4

1

4 4

1

0 0

1

0 0

Matched Not Matched

Work Experiences

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

tsChart CN-9

Number of Work Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsChild Neurology



Chart CN-10

Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsChild Neurology


Chart CN-11

Other Characteristics of U.S. DO SeniorsChild Neurology



37

0

4

8

12

16

20

Yes No

0

18

0

2

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Ph.D. Degree

0

4

8

12

16

Yes No

3

15

0

2

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Matched Not Matched


DM Dermatology



Table DM-1

Summary Statistics on U.S. DO SeniorsDermatology


Matched Unmatched
















0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

1 2 3 4 or More

14

10

14

1

3

7

3

1

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 orMore

0 0

7

2 2

5

2

5

3

4

3

4

0

1

0

1

6

3

1

3

0 0 0

1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Matched Not Matched

Contiguous Ranks

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Chart DM-2

Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. DO SeniorsDermatology



40

Chart DM-1

Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. DO SeniorsDermatology


Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous RanksDermatology

Graph DM-1

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20






Chart DM-3

COMLEX-USA Level 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsDermatology

0

2

4

6

8

10

12


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

0 0 0

2

8

11

8

54

100

1 1

34

1 12

0 01

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts



Chart DM-4

COMLEX-USA Level 2-CE Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsDermatology

0

2

4

6

8

10

12


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

0 01

2 2

11 11

3

8

100 0

21

43

10

2

01

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Graph DM-2

Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by COMLEX-USA Level 1 ScoreDermatology

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900






Chart DM-5

USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsDermatology

Chart DM-6

USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsDermatology

0

2

4

6

8

10

12


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

0 0 01

3

0

4

12

8

3

8

0 0 0 0 0

3 3

12

0

5

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

0 0 0 0 01

34

15

5

11

0 0 0 01 1

3

01 1

7

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts




0

4

8

12

16

20

24


02

43

2

23

1

4

0 01

5

Matched Not Matched

Publications

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lica

nts

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16


0

34

76

15

2 2 23

01

MatchedNot Matched

Research Projects

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

tsChart DM-7

Number of Research Projects of U.S. DO SeniorsDermatology



Chart DM-8

Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. DO SeniorsDermatology


0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More

0 0

1

4

2 2

7

3 3

5

8

0 0

1

2 2

1

2

0 0 0

3

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

2

4

6

8

10


3 3

5

10

9

5

1

2

1

0

1

5

MatchedNot Matched

Work Experiences

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

tsChart DM-9

Number of Work Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsDermatology



Chart DM-10

Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsDermatology


Chart DM-11

Other Characteristics of U.S. DO SeniorsDermatology



47

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Yes No

0

39

0

14

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Ph.D. Degree

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Yes No

5

34

2

12

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Matched Not Matched


DR Diagnostic Radiology



Table DR-1

Summary Statistics on U.S. DO SeniorsDiagnostic Radiology


Matched Unmatched
















0

20

40

60

80

100

1 2 3 4 or More

93

2823

03 4 51

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

4

8

12

16

20

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 orMore

23

0

6 6

4

8

10

13

9

1514

10

12 12

20

2

4

2 2

01

0 01

0 0 0 01

0 0

Matched Not Matched

Contiguous Ranks

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Chart DR-2

Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. DO SeniorsDiagnostic Radiology



50

Chart DR-1

Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. DO SeniorsDiagnostic Radiology


Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous RanksDiagnostic Radiology

Graph DR-1

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20






Chart DR-3

COMLEX-USA Level 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsDiagnostic Radiology

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

0 0

9

21

3638

28

9

1 201 2 2

5

0 1 0 0 0 02

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts



Chart DR-4

COMLEX-USA Level 2-CE Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsDiagnostic Radiology

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

0 1 2

15

32 32 31

1614

1 003 3 2 1 1 1 0 0 0

2

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Graph DR-2

Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by COMLEX-USA Level 1 ScoreDiagnostic Radiology

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850






Chart DR-5

USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsDiagnostic Radiology

Chart DR-6

USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsDiagnostic Radiology

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

0 0 0 1

7

18

4143

23

2

9

0 0 02

41 1 0 0 0

5

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

0 0 0 0

57

28

44

27

19

14

0 0 0 02 3 4

0 0 04

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts




0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40


37

24

18

14

10

32

20 0

20

3

Matched Not Matched

Publications

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lica

nts

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35


19

35

2927

18

8

2 3 20 1 0

MatchedNot Matched

Research Projects

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

tsChart DR-7

Number of Research Projects of U.S. DO SeniorsDiagnostic Radiology



Chart DR-8

Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. DO SeniorsDiagnostic Radiology


0

4

8

12

16

20

24

None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More

1

4

9

2321

18

8

14

11

4

18

10

21 1

0 0 0 01

2

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35


7

19

31 31

22 23

0 1 2 1 2 2

MatchedNot Matched

Work Experiences

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

tsChart DR-9

Number of Work Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsDiagnostic Radiology



Chart DR-10

Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsDiagnostic Radiology


Chart DR-11

Other Characteristics of U.S. DO SeniorsDiagnostic Radiology



57

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Yes No

0

144

0

13

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Ph.D. Degree

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Yes No

23

121

49

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Matched Not Matched


EM Emergency Medicine



Table EM-1

Summary Statistics on U.S. DO SeniorsEmergency Medicine

Measure (n=643) (n=124)

Matched Unmatched
















0

100

200

300

400

500

600

1 2 3 4 or More

541

83

18 1

69 514 0

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 orMore

126

1821

3642 41

5155

63 61

51 49

3933

65

1913

1914 15

18

8 72 3 3 2 0 0 0 1

Matched Not Matched

Contiguous Ranks

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Chart EM-2

Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. DO SeniorsEmergency Medicine



60

Chart EM-1

Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. DO SeniorsEmergency Medicine


Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous RanksEmergency Medicine

Graph EM-1

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20






Chart EM-3

COMLEX-USA Level 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsEmergency Medicine

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

0

34

94

166 171

98

46

23

1 3 72

2737

3018

6 2 1 0 0 1

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts



Chart EM-4

COMLEX-USA Level 2-CE Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsEmergency Medicine

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

112

53

106

154 158

86

47

136 7

0

1627 29 30

135 1 0 0 3

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Graph EM-2

Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by COMLEX-USA Level 1 ScoreEmergency Medicine

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000






Chart EM-5

USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsEmergency Medicine

Chart EM-6

USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsEmergency Medicine

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

0 1

19

36

94

129118

62

23

4

157

0 1 621

13 17 11 5 0 1

49

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

0 0 0 4

25

74

114

135

89

28

174

0 0 0 29

22 1710

2 1

61

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts




0

40

80

120

160

200


190

107

76 69

34

81

3824

9 12 7 12

Matched Not Matched

Publications

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lica

nts

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180


138

167

150

66

20 1831

21 21 175 6

MatchedNot Matched

Research Projects

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

tsChart EM-7

Number of Research Projects of U.S. DO SeniorsEmergency Medicine



Chart EM-8

Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. DO SeniorsEmergency Medicine


0

20

40

60

80

100

120

None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More

617

39

64 61 6268

4146

28

114

4 7 11 1016

10 10 7 6 3

18

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180


9

56

97

127

95

167

310

22 18 1732

MatchedNot Matched

Work Experiences

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

tsChart EM-9

Number of Work Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsEmergency Medicine



Chart EM-10

Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsEmergency Medicine


Chart EM-11

Other Characteristics of U.S. DO SeniorsEmergency Medicine



67

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Yes No

0

643

0

124Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Ph.D. Degree

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Yes No

116

527

34

90

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Matched Not Matched


FM Family Medicine



Table FM-1

Summary Statistics on U.S. DO SeniorsFamily Medicine

Measure (n=1,167) (n=67)

Matched Unmatched
















0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1 2 3 4 or More

1,056

1028 142 23 2 0

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

40

80

120

160

200

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 orMore

20 22 29 3452

35

6171 77

115104

112

82 8172

200

248 10 7 3 1 2 3 5 1 0 0 0 1 1 1

Matched Not Matched

Contiguous Ranks

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Chart FM-2

Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. DO SeniorsFamily Medicine



70

Chart FM-1

Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. DO SeniorsFamily Medicine


Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous RanksFamily Medicine

Graph FM-1

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20






Chart FM-3

COMLEX-USA Level 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsFamily Medicine

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

7

332356

233

141

5027

6 2 0 13136

19 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 2

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts



Chart FM-4

COMLEX-USA Level 2-CE Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsFamily Medicine

0

40

80

120

160

200

240

280

320


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

3

181

304282

188

120

4422

6 2154

22 229 4 2 0 0 0 0 4

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Graph FM-2

Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by COMLEX-USA Level 1 ScoreFamily Medicine

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850






Chart FM-5

USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsFamily Medicine

Chart FM-6

USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsFamily Medicine

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

2 12 32 65 97 68 5417 11 0

809

0 0 5 6 3 2 1 0 0 050

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

200

400

600

800

1,000


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

0 0 2 10 39 54 68 47 23 2

922

0 0 0 1 3 3 1 0 0 059

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts




0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400


375

178

122

7457

122

14 14 10 8 1 4

Matched Not Matched

Publications

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lica

nts

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350


215

342

206

100

42 3912 13 15 7 0 2

MatchedNot Matched

Research Projects

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

tsChart FM-7

Number of Research Projects of U.S. DO SeniorsFamily Medicine



Chart FM-8

Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. DO SeniorsFamily Medicine


0

40

80

120

160

200

240

None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More

10

37

6583

117 124

86 9581

55

218

0 4 5 9 5 6 5 2 4 3 8

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

40

80

120

160

200

240

280


63

137

208

163145

254

3 7 9 13 8 11

MatchedNot Matched

Work Experiences

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

tsChart FM-9

Number of Work Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsFamily Medicine



Chart FM-10

Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsFamily Medicine


Chart FM-11

Other Characteristics of U.S. DO SeniorsFamily Medicine



77

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

Yes No

3

1,164

265

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Ph.D. Degree

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

Yes No

243

924

1453

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Matched Not Matched


GS General Surgery



Table GS-1

Summary Statistics on U.S. DO SeniorsGeneral Surgery


Matched Unmatched
















0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

1 2 3 4 or More

149

22

4 0

55

22

2 0

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

4

8

12

16

20

24

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 orMore

34 4

1011

7

16

12

16

1311

15

8

13

9

23

15

11

15

10

3

7 7

42

01

02

1 10

Matched Not Matched

Contiguous Ranks

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Chart GS-2

Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. DO SeniorsGeneral Surgery



80

Chart GS-1

Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. DO SeniorsGeneral Surgery


Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous RanksGeneral Surgery

Graph GS-1

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20






Chart GS-3

COMLEX-USA Level 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsGeneral Surgery

0

10

20

30

40

50

60


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

04

12

4651

26 24

62 3 11

10

22 22

127

0 2 0 03

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts



Chart GS-4

COMLEX-USA Level 2-CE Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsGeneral Surgery

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

1 0

7

27

44

39

28

17

8

311

6

13

18

24

73 3

1 03

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Graph GS-2

Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by COMLEX-USA Level 1 ScoreGeneral Surgery

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

400 500 600 700 800 900






Chart GS-5

USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsGeneral Surgery

Chart GS-6

USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsGeneral Surgery

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

03

1

10

16

40 41

24

10

4

26

0 02

96

21

8

31 0

29

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

0 0 0 1

6

17

43

3228

15

33

0 0 02

6

1917

64

0

25

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts




0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40


31

2124

21

17

40

12 11

79

4

20

Matched Not Matched

Publications

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lica

nts

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45


18

27

41

32

16

21

9

17 17

11

63

MatchedNot Matched

Research Projects

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

tsChart GS-7

Number of Research Projects of U.S. DO SeniorsGeneral Surgery



Chart GS-8

Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. DO SeniorsGeneral Surgery


0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More

03

7

1513

26

1412 12

6

44

13 4

79

6 6 5 46

13

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

10

20

30

40

50


7

15

2730

24

47

2

710

1210

22

MatchedNot Matched

Work Experiences

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

tsChart GS-9

Number of Work Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsGeneral Surgery



Chart GS-10

Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsGeneral Surgery


Chart GS-11

Other Characteristics of U.S. DO SeniorsGeneral Surgery



87

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Yes No

2

173

0

79

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Ph.D. Degree

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Yes No

41

134

21

58

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Matched Not Matched


IM Internal Medicine



Table IM-1

Summary Statistics on U.S. DO SeniorsInternal Medicine

Measure (n=1,233) (n=88)

Matched Unmatched
















0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1 2 3 4 or More

1,073

146

13 148 35 5 0

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

40

80

120

160

200

240

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 orMore

4532 35 36

5642

55

8877

111 112100

82 77 74

211

20 17 2310 7 4 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

Matched Not Matched

Contiguous Ranks

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Chart IM-2

Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. DO SeniorsInternal Medicine



90

Chart IM-1

Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. DO SeniorsInternal Medicine


Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous RanksInternal Medicine

Graph IM-1

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20






Chart IM-3

COMLEX-USA Level 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsInternal Medicine

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

4

148

246

319

260

141

69

258 2 111

39 27 15 4 0 0 0 0 0 2

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts



Chart IM-4

COMLEX-USA Level 2-CE Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsInternal Medicine

0

40

80

120

160

200

240

280


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

1

78

183

262 259

215

132

55

2411 13

1

33 329 4 5 0 0 0 0 4

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Graph IM-2

Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by COMLEX-USA Level 1 ScoreInternal Medicine

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900






Chart IM-5

USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsInternal Medicine

Chart IM-6

USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsInternal Medicine

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

1 326

82

169 187 174

97

405

449

0 2 2 7 8 5 5 1 0 0

58

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

100

200

300

400

500

600


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

0 0 3 540

110

207181

113

35

539

0 0 0 1 5 5 5 1 0 0

71

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts




0

40

80

120

160

200

240

280

320


303

182

141

106 101

221

19 18 8 8 2 8

Matched Not Matched

Publications

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lica

nts

0

40

80

120

160

200

240

280

320


177

311291

156

7152

12 19 11 9 4 6

MatchedNot Matched

Research Projects

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

tsChart IM-7

Number of Research Projects of U.S. DO SeniorsInternal Medicine



Chart IM-8

Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. DO SeniorsInternal Medicine


0

40

80

120

160

200

None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More

15

37

98113

140 145

117

9476

56

187

3 6 6 11 8 6 7 6 3 2 5

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

40

80

120

160

200

240

280


60

173

251

211

164

212

8 10 13 7 7 16

MatchedNot Matched

Work Experiences

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

tsChart IM-9

Number of Work Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsInternal Medicine



Chart IM-10

Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsInternal Medicine


Chart IM-11

Other Characteristics of U.S. DO SeniorsInternal Medicine



97

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

Yes No

4

1,229

385

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Ph.D. Degree

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

Yes No

293

940

2167

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Matched Not Matched


IP Internal Medicine/Pediatrics



Table IP-1

Summary Statistics on U.S. DO SeniorsInternal Medicine/Pediatrics


Matched Unmatched
















0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

1 2 3 4 or More

1516

3

00

4

0 0

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 orMore

1

3

1 1

2 2 2

3

1

2 2

3

7

2

1 1

4

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Matched Not Matched

Contiguous Ranks

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Chart IP-2

Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. DO SeniorsInternal Medicine/Pediatrics



100

Chart IP-1

Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. DO SeniorsInternal Medicine/Pediatrics


Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous RanksInternal Medicine/Pediatrics

Graph IP-1

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20






Chart IP-3

COMLEX-USA Level 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsInternal Medicine/Pediatrics

0

2

4

6

8

10

12


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

0

3 3

9

6

11

1 10 0 00 0

10

2

01

0 0 0 0

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts



Chart IP-4

COMLEX-USA Level 2-CE Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsInternal Medicine/Pediatrics

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

01

0

4

7

13

6

21

0 00 0 01

2

01

0 0 0 0

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Graph IP-2

Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by COMLEX-USA Level 1 ScoreInternal Medicine/Pediatrics

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750






Chart IP-5

USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsInternal Medicine/Pediatrics

Chart IP-6

USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsInternal Medicine/Pediatrics

0

2

4

6

8

10

12


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

0 0 0 0

4

9

54

0 0

12

0 0 0 0

21

0 0 0 01

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

0 0 0 0 0

3

7

56

0

13

0 0 0 0 01 1 1

0 01

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts




0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8


8

4

0

8

3

6

0

1

0 0

1

2

Matched Not Matched

Publications

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lica

nts

0

2

4

6

8

10


4

9

6

4 4

2

0 0

2

1 1

0

MatchedNot Matched

Research Projects

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

tsChart IP-7

Number of Research Projects of U.S. DO SeniorsInternal Medicine/Pediatrics



Chart IP-8

Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. DO SeniorsInternal Medicine/Pediatrics


0

2

4

6

8

10

None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More

0 01

34

1

3

1

5

2

9

0 0 01

0

2

0 0 0 01

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

2

4

6

8

10


1

5 5 5

3

10

0

1 1

0

1 1

MatchedNot Matched

Work Experiences

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

tsChart IP-9

Number of Work Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsInternal Medicine/Pediatrics



Chart IP-10

Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsInternal Medicine/Pediatrics


Chart IP-11

Other Characteristics of U.S. DO SeniorsInternal Medicine/Pediatrics



107

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Yes No

0

34

0

4

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Ph.D. Degree

0

4

8

12

16

20

24

28

Yes No

8

26

2 2

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Matched Not Matched


IR Interventional Radiology



Table IR-1

Summary Statistics on U.S. DO SeniorsInterventional Radiology


Matched Unmatched
















0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

1 2 3 4 or More

0

13

0 00

3 3

1

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

1

2

3

4

5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 orMore

4

2

0

1

2

0

1

0

1 1

0 0 0 0

1

0

5

1

0 0

1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Matched Not Matched

Contiguous Ranks

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Chart IR-2

Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. DO SeniorsInterventional Radiology



110

Chart IR-1

Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. DO SeniorsInterventional Radiology


Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous RanksInterventional Radiology

Graph IR-1

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20






Chart IR-3

COMLEX-USA Level 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsInterventional Radiology

0

1

2

3

4


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

0 0 0

2

1

2

1

2

3

2

00 0

1

4

1 1

0 0 0 0 0

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts



Chart IR-4

COMLEX-USA Level 2-CE Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsInterventional Radiology

0

1

2

3

4

5

6


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

0 0 0

1

2

0

2

6

1 1

00 0 0

2

3

1 1

0 0 0 0

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Graph IR-2

Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by COMLEX-USA Level 1 ScoreInterventional Radiology

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

400 500 600 700 800 900 1000






Chart IR-5

USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsInterventional Radiology

Chart IR-6

USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsInterventional Radiology

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

0 0 0 0 0 0

3

1

7

2

00 0 0 0

1

3

0

1 1

0

1

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

1

2

3

4

5


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

0 0 0 0

1 1 1 1

4 4

1

0 0 0 0 0

1

2

3

1

0 0

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts




0

1

2

3

4

5

6


1 1

2

1 1

6

0

1

2

1

0

3

Matched Not Matched

Publications

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lica

nts

1

2

3

4

5


2 2

1 1 1

4

1 1

2

1 1 1

Matched Not Matched

Research Projects

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Chart IR-7

Number of Research Projects of U.S. DO SeniorsInterventional Radiology



Chart IR-8

Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. DO SeniorsInterventional Radiology


0

1

2

3

4

5

None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More

0 0

2

1 1 1 1 1

0 0

4

0 0 0

2

1 1

0

2

1

0 0

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

1

2

3

4

5


0

1 1

3

1

5

0 0

5

1

0

1

MatchedNot Matched

Work Experiences

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

tsChart IR-9

Number of Work Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsInterventional Radiology



Chart IR-10

Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsInterventional Radiology


Chart IR-11

Other Characteristics of U.S. DO SeniorsInterventional Radiology



117

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Yes No

0

13

0

7

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Ph.D. Degree

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Yes No

4

9

4

3

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Matched Not Matched


NS Neurological Surgery



Table NS-1

Summary Statistics on U.S. DO SeniorsNeurological Surgery


Matched Unmatched
















0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1 2 3 4 or More

1 1

0 0

3

7

2

0

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

1

2

3

4

5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 orMore

1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

11

4

1

3

1

0

1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1

Matched Not Matched

Contiguous Ranks

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Chart NS-2

Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. DO SeniorsNeurological Surgery



120

Chart NS-1

Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. DO SeniorsNeurological Surgery


Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous RanksNeurological Surgery

Graph NS-1

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20






Chart NS-3

COMLEX-USA Level 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsNeurological Surgery

0

1

2

3

4


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

0

1

0 0 0 0

1

0 0 0 00 0

3 3

2 2 2

0 0 0 0

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts



Chart NS-4

COMLEX-USA Level 2-CE Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsNeurological Surgery

0

1

2

3

4

5


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

0 0

1

0 0 0

1

0 0 0 00

1 1

2

5

2

1

0 0 0 0

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Graph NS-2

Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by COMLEX-USA Level 1 ScoreNeurological Surgery

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850






Chart NS-5

USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsNeurological Surgery

Chart NS-6

USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsNeurological Surgery

0

1

2

3

4

5

6


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1

0

1

0 0

1 1 1

6

2

1

0 0 0

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

1

2

3

4

5

6


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

0 0 0 0

1

0 0

1

0 0 00 0 0 0

1

0

6

0

2

0

3

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts




0

1

2

3

4

5


0

1

0 0 0

11

3

0 0 0

5

Matched Not Matched

Publications

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lica

nts

0

1

2

3

4

5


0 0

1

0

1

00 0

4

1

4

0

Matched Not Matched

Research Projects

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Chart NS-7

Number of Research Projects of U.S. DO SeniorsNeurological Surgery



Chart NS-8

Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. DO SeniorsNeurological Surgery


0

1

2

3

4

5

6

None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More

0 0 0

1

0 0 0 0

1

0 00 0

2

0 0 0 0 0

1

0

6

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

1

2

3


0 0 0 0

1 1

0

2 2 2 2

1

Matched Not Matched

Work Experiences

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

tsChart NS-9

Number of Work Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsNeurological Surgery



Chart NS-10

Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsNeurological Surgery


Chart NS-11

Other Characteristics of U.S. DO SeniorsNeurological Surgery



127

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Yes No

0

2

0

12

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Ph.D. Degree

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Yes No

1 1

0

12

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Matched Not Matched


N Neurology



Table N-1

Summary Statistics on U.S. DO SeniorsNeurology


Matched Unmatched
















0

20

40

60

80

100

1 2 3 4 or More

95

14

2 17

1 0 0

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 orMore

0

23 3

2

5

8

6 6

11

13

1110

13

6

13

0 01

3

0 0

3

0 01

0 0 0 0 0 0

Matched Not Matched

Contiguous Ranks

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Chart N-2

Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. DO SeniorsNeurology



130

Chart N-1

Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. DO SeniorsNeurology


Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous RanksNeurology

Graph N-1

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20






Chart N-3

COMLEX-USA Level 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsNeurology

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

0

6

22

37

23

15

6

20 0 10 1 2 2 1 0 1 1 0 0 0

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts



Chart N-4

COMLEX-USA Level 2-CE Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsNeurology

0

4

8

12

16

20

24

28


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

0

6

19

28

18

22

11

5

1 1 10

4

0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Graph N-2

Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by COMLEX-USA Level 1 ScoreNeurology

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

400 500 600 700 800 900






Chart N-5

USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsNeurology

Chart N-6

USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsNeurology

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

0 0 1

7

18

27

10 10

4

0

35

0 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 1 02

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

0 0 0 14

16

23

14

84

42

0 0 1 0 02 1 1 0 0

3

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts




0

4

8

12

16

20

24

28


26

16

9

15

4

23

2 1 20 0

2

Matched Not Matched

Publications

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lica

nts

0

4

8

12

16

20

24

28

32


10

29

24

16

7 8

20

2 1 0 0

MatchedNot Matched

Research Projects

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

tsChart N-7

Number of Research Projects of U.S. DO SeniorsNeurology



Chart N-8

Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. DO SeniorsNeurology


0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More

1 1

4

11

9

1312

8

13

7

16

1 1 1 10 0

10 0 0 0

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

4

8

12

16

20

24

28


5

17

25

20

8

20

0 0 1 2 1 2

MatchedNot Matched

Work Experiences

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

tsChart N-9

Number of Work Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsNeurology



Chart N-10

Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsNeurology


Chart N-11

Other Characteristics of U.S. DO SeniorsNeurology



137

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Yes No

2

110

08

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Ph.D. Degree

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Yes No

30

82

3 5

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Matched Not Matched


OB Obstetrics and Gynecology



Table OB-1

Summary Statistics on U.S. DO SeniorsObstetrics and Gynecology


Matched Unmatched
















0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

1 2 3 4 or More

174

35

0 0

49

24

6 0

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

4

8

12

16

20

24

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 orMore

1

5 5

810

13

20

17

14

21

1817

16

8

14

22

15

9 9 9

5

12

45

64

0 01

0 01

Matched Not Matched

Contiguous Ranks

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Chart OB-2

Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. DO SeniorsObstetrics and Gynecology



140

Chart OB-1

Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. DO SeniorsObstetrics and Gynecology


Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous RanksObstetrics and Gynecology

Graph OB-1

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20






Chart OB-3

COMLEX-USA Level 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsObstetrics and Gynecology

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

0

8

25

61

47

39

23

3 2 0 106

2421

17

10

1 0 0 0 1

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts



Chart OB-4

COMLEX-USA Level 2-CE Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsObstetrics and Gynecology

0

10

20

30

40

50

60


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

03

13

32

4953

34

18

4 2 10

6

13

22 21

11

4 2 0 0 1

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Graph OB-2

Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by COMLEX-USA Level 1 ScoreObstetrics and Gynecology

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850






Chart OB-5

USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsObstetrics and Gynecology

Chart OB-6

USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsObstetrics and Gynecology

0

10

20

30

40

50

60


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

0 0 1

10

27

4845

18

71

52

0 0 2

10

21

7

14

40 0

22

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

10

20

30

40

50

60


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

0 0 0 1

7

20

40

59

22

12

48

0 0 0 2

813

16

105

0

26

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts




5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45


41

33 3229

11

40

1613

15

9

5

10

Matched Not Matched

Publications

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lica

nts

0

10

20

30

40

50

60


24

43

56

33

201614

1821

73 5

MatchedNot Matched

Research Projects

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

tsChart OB-7

Number of Research Projects of U.S. DO SeniorsObstetrics and Gynecology



Chart OB-8

Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. DO SeniorsObstetrics and Gynecology


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More

0 14

713

16 17 1824

18

68

03 2

7 6 8 8 612

4

14

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45


8

23

34

44

32

44

79

16 17

6

15

MatchedNot Matched

Work Experiences

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

tsChart OB-9

Number of Work Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsObstetrics and Gynecology



Chart OB-10

Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsObstetrics and Gynecology


Chart OB-11

Other Characteristics of U.S. DO SeniorsObstetrics and Gynecology



147

0

40

80

120

160

200

240

Yes No

0

209

1

79

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Ph.D. Degree

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Yes No

49

160

25

55

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Matched Not Matched


ORS Orthopaedic Surgery



Table ORS-1

Summary Statistics on U.S. DO SeniorsOrthopaedic Surgery


Matched Unmatched
















0

20

40

60

80

100

1 2 3 4 or More

88

18

3 0

2821

3 2

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

4

8

12

16

20

24

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 orMore

24

10

19

22

18

8

11

75

10 0 0 0

2

15

89

8

45

1 1 1 10 0 0 0 0

1

Matched Not Matched

Contiguous Ranks

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Chart ORS-2

Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. DO SeniorsOrthopaedic Surgery



150

Chart ORS-1

Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. DO SeniorsOrthopaedic Surgery


Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous RanksOrthopaedic Surgery

Graph ORS-1

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20






Chart ORS-3

COMLEX-USA Level 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsOrthopaedic Surgery

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

0 0 0

7

15

35

27

14

10

1 00 02

7

16 16

9

31 0 0

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts



Chart ORS-4

COMLEX-USA Level 2-CE Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsOrthopaedic Surgery

0

4

8

12

16

20

24

28


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

0 1 1

79

25 25

20

14

7

00 0

5

1012

10

6

10

1 0 0

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Graph ORS-2

Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by COMLEX-USA Level 1 ScoreOrthopaedic Surgery

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

400 500 600 700 800 900 1000






Chart ORS-5

USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsOrthopaedic Surgery

Chart ORS-6

USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsOrthopaedic Surgery

0

4

8

12

16

20

24

28


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

0 0 0 0

4

17

23

2725

4

9

0 0 02 1

10 10

15

6

0

10

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

0 0 0 0 1 1

12

28

32

15

20

0 0 0 0 1

5 4

15

8

1

20

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts




0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45


13 1311

15

6

41

139

5 4 3

18

Matched Not Matched

Publications

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lica

nts

4

8

12

16

20

24

28

32


6

14

30

27

1012

8

16

8 9

5 5

MatchedNot Matched

Research Projects

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

tsChart ORS-7

Number of Research Projects of U.S. DO SeniorsOrthopaedic Surgery



Chart ORS-8

Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. DO SeniorsOrthopaedic Surgery


0

4

8

12

16

20

24

None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More

12

3

16

8

19

87 7

3

24

10

4

86

7

3

9

34

6

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40


2

10

18 17

13

38

2 3

15

911

13

MatchedNot Matched

Work Experiences

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

tsChart ORS-9

Number of Work Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsOrthopaedic Surgery



Chart ORS-10

Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsOrthopaedic Surgery


Chart ORS-11

Other Characteristics of U.S. DO SeniorsOrthopaedic Surgery



157

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Yes No

1

108

0

54

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Ph.D. Degree

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Yes No

24

85

11

43

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Matched Not Matched


OTO Otolaryngology



Table OTO-1

Summary Statistics on U.S. DO SeniorsOtolaryngology


Matched Unmatched
















0

2

4

6

8

10

1 2 3 4 or More

9

7

1

0

5

6

0 0

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 orMore

0 0 0

1

4

1

2

0

6

1

0

2

0 0 0 0

4

2

0

2 2

1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Matched Not Matched

Contiguous Ranks

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Chart OTO-2

Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. DO SeniorsOtolaryngology



160

Chart OTO-1

Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. DO SeniorsOtolaryngology


Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous RanksOtolaryngology

Graph OTO-1

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20






Chart OTO-3

COMLEX-USA Level 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsOtolaryngology

0

1

2

3

4

5


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

0 0 0

2

3

2

4 4

1 1

0

1

0

1

2

1

4

1 1

0 0 0

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts



Chart OTO-4

COMLEX-USA Level 2-CE Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsOtolaryngology

0

1

2

3

4

5


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

0 0 0

1 1

3

4

2

5

1

0

1

0

1

2

1

3

2

0

1

0 0

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Graph OTO-2

Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by COMLEX-USA Level 1 ScoreOtolaryngology

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900






Chart OTO-5

USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsOtolaryngology

Chart OTO-6

USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsOtolaryngology

0

1

2

3

4

5

6


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

0 0 0

2

0

1

2

6

3

1

2

0 0

1

0 0

3

2

0

3

0

2

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

1

2

3

4

5


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

0 0 0 0 0

2

0

4

5

4

2

0 0 0 0 0

3

2

1

2

0

3

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts




0

2

4

6

8

10

12


0 01

0

3

12

21 1

3

12

Matched Not Matched

Publications

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lica

nts

0

1

2

3

4

5

6


0

1

2 2

6

5

0 0

4 4

1

0

MatchedNot Matched

Research Projects

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Chart OTO-7

Number of Research Projects of U.S. DO SeniorsOtolaryngology



Chart OTO-8

Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. DO SeniorsOtolaryngology


0

1

2

3

4

5

None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More

0 0

1

2

1 1

4

1 1

2

3

0

1 1

0

2

1

0 0

4

0

1

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

1

2

3

4

5


0

1

3

4

3

5

0

2

1

3

2 2

MatchedNot Matched

Work Experiences

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

tsChart OTO-9

Number of Work Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsOtolaryngology



Chart OTO-10

Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsOtolaryngology


Chart OTO-11

Other Characteristics of U.S. DO SeniorsOtolaryngology



167

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

Yes No

0

17

0

11

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Ph.D. Degree

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Yes No

3

14

2

9

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Matched Not Matched


PTH Pathology



Table PTH-1

Summary Statistics on U.S. DO SeniorsPathology


Matched Unmatched
















0

10

20

30

40

50

1 2 3 4 or More

49

52

01 20 0

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 orMore

2

1 1

0 0

5

4 4 4

5

6 6

4

3

8

3

0

1 1

0 0 0

1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Matched Not Matched

Contiguous Ranks

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Chart PTH-2

Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. DO SeniorsPathology



170

Chart PTH-1

Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. DO SeniorsPathology


Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous RanksPathology

Graph PTH-1

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20






Chart PTH-3

COMLEX-USA Level 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsPathology

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

1

7

1617

7

4

0

2 2

0 00

2

01

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts



Chart PTH-4

COMLEX-USA Level 2-CE Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsPathology

0

4

8

12

16

20


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

0

7

9

18

11

6

1 12

100

12

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Graph PTH-2

Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by COMLEX-USA Level 1 ScorePathology

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800






Chart PTH-5

USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsPathology

Chart PTH-6

USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsPathology

0

4

8

12

16

20

24


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

10

2

98

54

2 21

22

0 0 02

10 0 0 0 0 0

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

4

8

12

16

20

24

28

32


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

0 0 0 0

7 6 53 2 3

30

0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 02

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts




0

2

4

6

8

10

12


1110

6 6

8

10

12

0 0 0 0

Matched Not Matched

Publications

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lica

nts

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14


1110 10

14

4

21

2

0 0 0 0

MatchedNot Matched

Research Projects

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

tsChart PTH-7

Number of Research Projects of U.S. DO SeniorsPathology



Chart PTH-8

Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. DO SeniorsPathology


0

2

4

6

8

10

None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More

2

4

7

4

89

32

4 45

01 1

0 01

0 0 0 0 0

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

4

8

12

16

20


2

78

9

7

19

10

2

0 0 0

MatchedNot Matched

Work Experiences

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

tsChart PTH-9

Number of Work Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsPathology



Chart PTH-10

Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsPathology


Chart PTH-11

Other Characteristics of U.S. DO SeniorsPathology



177

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Yes No

1

55

03

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Ph.D. Degree

0

10

20

30

40

50

Yes No

12

44

03

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Matched Not Matched


PD Pediatrics



Table PD-1

Summary Statistics on U.S. DO SeniorsPediatrics


Matched Unmatched
















0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

1 2 3 4 or More

397

55

5 09 7 3 1

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 orMore

811 11

6 813

2319

3539

36

5155

44

31

67

6 52 3 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Matched Not Matched

Contiguous Ranks

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Chart PD-2

Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. DO SeniorsPediatrics



180

Chart PD-1

Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. DO SeniorsPediatrics


Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous RanksPediatrics

Graph PD-1

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20






Chart PD-3

COMLEX-USA Level 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsPediatrics

0

20

40

60

80

100

120


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

3

65

113 116

95

35

18

3 0 09

111

5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts



Chart PD-4

COMLEX-USA Level 2-CE Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsPediatrics

0

20

40

60

80

100

120


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

0

39

61

102109

74

42

16

4 010

1 5 83 2 0 0 0 0 0 1

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Graph PD-2

Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by COMLEX-USA Level 1 ScorePediatrics

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900






Chart PD-5

USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsPediatrics

Chart PD-6

USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsPediatrics

0

40

80

120

160

200

240


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

1 112

30

5871

49

164 1

214

0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 016

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

40

80

120

160

200

240

280


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

0 0 0 213

52 6242

269

251

0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 019

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts




0

20

40

60

80

100

120


119

76

5647

25

77

61 1 2 0 4

Matched Not Matched

Publications

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lica

nts

0

20

40

60

80

100

120


75

116108

59

2717

3 4 4 1 1 2

MatchedNot Matched

Research Projects

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

tsChart PD-7

Number of Research Projects of U.S. DO SeniorsPediatrics



Chart PD-8

Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. DO SeniorsPediatrics


0

20

40

60

80

100

120

None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More

06

1520

27

40 43 4452

29

118

0 0 1 1 3 0 3 1 0 05

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

20

40

60

80

100


20

58

8682

59

87

1 3 1 1 26

MatchedNot Matched

Work Experiences

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

tsChart PD-9

Number of Work Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsPediatrics



Chart PD-10

Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsPediatrics


Chart PD-11

Other Characteristics of U.S. DO SeniorsPediatrics



187

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Yes No

3

454

020

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Ph.D. Degree

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

Yes No

96

361

7 13

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Matched Not Matched


PM Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation



Table PM-1

Summary Statistics on U.S. DO SeniorsPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation


Matched Unmatched
















0

20

40

60

80

100

1 2 3 4 or More

86

37 35

69 12 10

1

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 orMore

25

2 3

710 11

15

5

11 10

17

1113

9

33

4 52 3 3 2 2 3

0 1 1 1 1 2 1 1

Matched Not Matched

Contiguous Ranks

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Chart PM-2

Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. DO SeniorsPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation



190

Chart PM-1

Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. DO SeniorsPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation


Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous RanksPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Graph PM-1

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20






Chart PM-3

COMLEX-USA Level 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

2

16

28

45

36

22

10

3 20 00

8 8 7 7

1 1 0 0 0 0

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts



Chart PM-4

COMLEX-USA Level 2-CE Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

1

7

24

4139

27

16

62 1 00

5

10

47

31 1 0 0 1

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Graph PM-2

Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by COMLEX-USA Level 1 ScorePhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800






Chart PM-5

USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Chart PM-6

USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation

0

10

20

30

40

50

60


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

0 03

13

27 2722

93

0

60

0 0 1 3 3 47

2 0 0

12

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

20

40

60

80

100


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

0 0 0 17

18 20 1710

2

89

0 0 0 04 2 5 3 0 0

18

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts




0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35


34

21

29

17

11

31

9 8

2 31

4

Matched Not Matched

Publications

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lica

nts

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45


20

3741

29

11 106 7

52

42

MatchedNot Matched

Research Projects

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

tsChart PM-7

Number of Research Projects of U.S. DO SeniorsPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation



Chart PM-8

Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. DO SeniorsPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation


0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More

2 1

79

16 1618

1113

16

35

0 0

4

0

53 2 1

30

8

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45


7

21

29 28

15

41

62

47

4 3

MatchedNot Matched

Work Experiences

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

tsChart PM-9

Number of Work Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation



Chart PM-10

Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation


Chart PM-11

Other Characteristics of U.S. DO SeniorsPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation



197

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Yes No

0

164

0

32Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Ph.D. Degree

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Yes No

35

129

8

24Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Matched Not Matched


PS Plastic Surgery



Table PS-1

Summary Statistics on U.S. DO SeniorsPlastic Surgery


Matched Unmatched

3.6Mean number of contiguous ranks1.

2.0Mean number of distinct specialties ranked2.

609Mean COMLEX-USA Level 1 score3.

592Mean COMLEX-USA Level 2-CE score4.

231Mean USMLE Step 1 score5.

241Mean USMLE Step 2 CK score6.

3.5Mean number of research experiences7.

11.8Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications8.

4.9Mean number of work experiences9.

10.0Mean number of volunteer experiences10.

0.0Percentage who have a Ph.D. degree11.

50.0Percentage who have another graduate degree12.




0

2

4

6

8

10

1 2 3 4 or More

1

10

1

0

Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

1

2

3

4

5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 orMore

5

1

2

0

1 1 1

0 0 0 0

1

0 0 0 0

Not Matched

Contiguous Ranks

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Chart PS-2

Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. DO SeniorsPlastic Surgery



200

Chart PS-1

Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. DO SeniorsPlastic Surgery


Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous RanksPlastic Surgery

Graph PS-1

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20






Chart PS-3

COMLEX-USA Level 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsPlastic Surgery

0

1

2

3

4

5


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

0

1

0

2 2

4

1

2

0 0 0

Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts



Chart PS-4

COMLEX-USA Level 2-CE Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsPlastic Surgery

0

1

2

3

4

5


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

0

1

0

2

4

2

1

2

0 0 0

Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Graph PS-2

Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by COMLEX-USA Level 1 ScorePlastic Surgery

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 720 760






Chart PS-5

USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsPlastic Surgery

Chart PS-6

USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsPlastic Surgery

0

1

2

3

4

5


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

0 0

2

0 0

3

2

5

0 0 0

Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

1

2

3

4

5


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

0 0 0 0

1 1

2

4

3

0

1

Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts




0

1

2

3

4

5


0

2

0 0

5

4

Not Matched

Publications

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lica

nts

0

1

2

3

4

5


0

1 1

3

4

2

Not Matched

Research Projects

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Chart PS-7

Number of Research Projects of U.S. DO SeniorsPlastic Surgery



Chart PS-8

Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. DO SeniorsPlastic Surgery


0

1

2

3

4

5

6

None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More

0 0

1

0

1

0

2

1

0 0

6

Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

1

2

3

4

5


0 0 0

4

3

4

Not Matched

Work Experiences

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

tsChart PS-9

Number of Work Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsPlastic Surgery



Chart PS-10

Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsPlastic Surgery


Chart PS-11

Other Characteristics of U.S. DO SeniorsPlastic Surgery



207

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Yes No

0

12

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Ph.D. Degree

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Yes No

6 6

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Matched Not Matched


P Psychiatry



Table P-1

Summary Statistics on U.S. DO SeniorsPsychiatry


Matched Unmatched
















0

40

80

120

160

200

240

1 2 3 4 or More

234

55

7 0

38

152 0

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

4

8

12

16

20

24

28

32

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 orMore

4

10 10

1417

21

26

1922

29

22

30

22

14

9

27

12

68

3

7

3 41 1

4

03

1 0 02

Matched Not Matched

Contiguous Ranks

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Chart P-2

Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. DO SeniorsPsychiatry



210

Chart P-1

Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. DO SeniorsPsychiatry


Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous RanksPsychiatry

Graph P-1

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20






Chart P-3

COMLEX-USA Level 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsPsychiatry

0

20

40

60

80

100


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

1

46

70

81

49

28

17

3 1 0 00

19 17 145

0 0 0 0 0 0

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts



Chart P-4

COMLEX-USA Level 2-CE Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsPsychiatry

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

1

20

56

7168

46

1711

30

33

1215

117 5

1 0 0 0 1

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Graph P-2

Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by COMLEX-USA Level 1 ScorePsychiatry

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800






Chart P-5

USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsPsychiatry

Chart P-6

USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsPsychiatry

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

0 2 4

19

39 4029 28

3 0

132

0 1 2 2 5 5 3 0 0 0

37

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

0 0 0 111

2635 33

196

165

0 0 0 0 0 2 5 3 0 0

45

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts




0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70


67

4239

28

16

56

20

8 63 3 3

Matched Not Matched

Publications

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lica

nts

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80


47

74

51

43

14

2216 15

4 3 4 2

MatchedNot Matched

Research Projects

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

tsChart P-7

Number of Research Projects of U.S. DO SeniorsPsychiatry



Chart P-8

Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. DO SeniorsPsychiatry


0

10

20

30

40

50

None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More

4 4

19

27 27

33

27 28 26

9

48

3 27 6 6 4

84

0 15

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

10

20

30

40

50

60


15

35

54

4643

58

5 610 11

6 7

MatchedNot Matched

Work Experiences

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

tsChart P-9

Number of Work Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsPsychiatry



Chart P-10

Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsPsychiatry


Chart P-11

Other Characteristics of U.S. DO SeniorsPsychiatry



217

0

40

80

120

160

200

240

280

320

Yes No

2

294

1

54Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Ph.D. Degree

0

40

80

120

160

200

240

Yes No

58

238

14

41Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Matched Not Matched


VS Vascular Surgery



Table VS-1

Summary Statistics on U.S. DO SeniorsVascular Surgery

Measure (n=5) (n=2)

Matched Unmatched






250Mean USMLE Step 2 CK score6.










0

1

2

3

4

1 2 3 4 or More

2

3

0 00 0

2

0

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

1

2

3

4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 orMore

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1

0

1

0 0 0 0

1

22

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Matched Not Matched

Contiguous Ranks

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Chart VS-2

Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. DO SeniorsVascular Surgery



220

Chart VS-1

Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. DO SeniorsVascular Surgery


Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous RanksVascular Surgery

Graph VS-1

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20






Chart VS-3

COMLEX-USA Level 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsVascular Surgery

0

1

2

3

4


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

0 0 0 0

2 2

0

1

0 0 00

1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts



Chart VS-4

COMLEX-USA Level 2-CE Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsVascular Surgery

0

1

2

3

4


Between 451and 500

Between 501and 550

Between 551and 600

Between 601and 650

Between 651and 700

Between 701and 750

Between 751and 800

>800 ScoreUnknown

0 0 0 0

2

1

2

0 0 0 00

1

0 0

1

0 0 0 0 0 0

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Graph VS-2

Probability of U.S. DO Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by COMLEX-USA Level 1 ScoreVascular Surgery

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750






Chart VS-5

USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsVascular Surgery

Chart VS-6

USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. DO SeniorsVascular Surgery

0

1

2

3


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

0 0 0 0 0

1 1

2

0

1

00 0 0 0

1

0 0 0 0 0

1

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

1

2

3

4


Between 191and 200

Between 201and 210

Between 211and 220

Between 221and 230

Between 231and 240

Between 241and 250

Between 251and 260

>260 ScoreUnknown

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2

3

0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2

MatchedNot Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts




0

1

2

3

4


0 0 0

1

0

3

0 0 0 0

1 1

Matched Not Matched

Publications

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lica

nts

0

1

2

3


0

2

0 0

1 1

0 0 0

1 1

0

MatchedNot Matched

Research Projects

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Chart VS-7

Number of Research Projects of U.S. DO SeniorsVascular Surgery



Chart VS-8

Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. DO SeniorsVascular Surgery


0

1

2

3

4

None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More

0 0 0

1

2

0 0 0 0 0

1

0 0 0 0

1

0

1

0 0 0 0

Matched Not Matched


Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

0

1

2

3

4


0

1 1

0 0

2

0 0

2

0 0 0

MatchedNot Matched

Work Experiences

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

tsChart VS-9

Number of Work Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsVascular Surgery



Chart VS-10

Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. DO SeniorsVascular Surgery


Chart VS-11

Other Characteristics of U.S. DO SeniorsVascular Surgery



227

0

1

2

3

4

5

Yes No

0

5

0

2

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts

Ph.D. Degree

1

2

3

4

5

Yes No

1

4

1 1

Nu

mb

er o

f A

pp

lican

ts


Matched Not Matched


Charting Outcomes in the Match · final dataset. Missing data were found in the number of...

Documents

Transcript of Charting Outcomes in the Match · final dataset. Missing data were found in the number of...