CHARM Market Consultation in Traffic Management Industry Event 29/3/12 – Intertraffic 2012...
-
Upload
elaine-colie -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
2
Transcript of CHARM Market Consultation in Traffic Management Industry Event 29/3/12 – Intertraffic 2012...
CHARM Market Consultation in Traffic Management
Industry Event
29/3/12 – Intertraffic 2012
Amsterdam
Welcome
• Robert Castleman – Divisional Director, Traffic Technology – Highways Agency
• Kees v.d. Kaa – Chief Information Officer, Rijkswaterstaat
Purpose
The purpose of this briefing is to explain to you:– The context of this programme.– What we are seeking.
Agenda
• Ambitions of the CHARM programme– Ian Chalmers Programme Manager
Highways Agency
• The Process for the CHARM market consultation
– Johann Visser Programme Manager Rijkswaterstaat
Ambitions of the CHARM programme.
Traffic Management: Overview
Core capabilities
Dynamic Traffic Management
Road usersVehicle
data
Weather
Call orrequest
Signs andsignals
Physicalrestrictions
Information
Otherdata
Sensors “Messengers”
Data exchange
Incident Management
Information Provision
RoadsideAssistance
CHARM - Overview
• The aim of CHARM is to define a new generation of traffic management systems, that may be jointly purchased.
• The outcomes are:
– To a high extent support the traffic management processes in each organisation, currently and within the foreseeable future;
– Enable operational resilience (in case of fire, power failure, etc.);– Support a managed service model, promote functional
development during the operational phase, and prevent vendor lock-in;
– Enable the total cost of ownership to be reduced significantly from the parties' current generation of traffic management centers.
Background• The organisations:
– Have worked together to share knowledge and experience.– Are very similar and share similar problems.– Face similar issues in addressing rising cost of ownership and
vendor lock-in.– Wish to decouple their technology solutions from the business
requirements so that new operating models can be implemented and achieve efficiency savings.
• Aggregating the demand from several organisations increases the potential for expanding the market and reducing costs.
Scope
• Functions Definition for Procurement Purposes– Are we aligned?
• Market Consultation– Is it feasible?
• Joint Procurement Strategy to Expand Market– How do we get there?
Confidence
- Degree of similarity.
- Comparison has confirmed.
Hig
hw
ays
Ag
ency
Rijkswaterstaat
80% Solution
The expected Outcome
• The ability to take a decision about potential future procurement in Dec 2012.
The Process for the CHARM market consultation
CHARM Market Consultation
• Objective: to enable the market place to show how the future strategy and objectives of Highways Agency & Rijkswaterstaat can be realised from a wide range of leading suppliers.
Market Consultation round 1
• Objective: to enable the market place to provide RWS and HA with an insight in the capability of wide range of leading suppliers in meeting the requirement.
• Publication: – Market consultation document– Top Level Requirements (draft)
• Questionnaire– your feedback will help us shape round 2
Market Consultation round 2
• Objective: to obtain a clearer and more detailed insight in the potential solutions that industry can offer that meet the ambitions of HA and RWS.
• Publication: – User Needs– Functions Definition– Partial Business Case
Timetable
• Deadline return of questionnaire: 1 May
• Insights round 1 published: June
• Round 2: June – October
• Insights round 2 published: December
Future procurements
Expectation in the next decade:
• HA: 7 out of 7 regional TMCs
• RWS: 2 out of 5 regional TMCs
Innovation Challenges
• Preparations - 2012• PCP Phase 1: Solution design – 2013• PCP Phase 2: Prototyping – 2014• PCP Phase 3: Pre-production testing –
2015• The Challenges
– 1. Advanced network management– 2. Advanced traffic predictions;– 3. Support of co-operative ITS functions
Questions?
Queries / contact address:• [email protected].
uk
Documents:• www.rijkswaterstaat.nl/charm