CHARITY SORP 2015 PRACTICAL GUIDANCE - Tait Walker · TAITWALKER.CO.UK CHARITY SORP 2015 PRACTICAL...
Transcript of CHARITY SORP 2015 PRACTICAL GUIDANCE - Tait Walker · TAITWALKER.CO.UK CHARITY SORP 2015 PRACTICAL...
TAITWALKER.CO.UK
C H A R I T Y S O R P 2 0 1 5 P R A C T I C A L G U I D A N C E
Adopting the new standard
2 TAITWALKER.CO.UK
T H E C H A R I T I E S ’ S T A T E M E N T O F R E C O M M E N D E D P R A C T I C E ( S O R P )
A CHOICE OF SORP – FRS102 vs FRSSE. Because of the differences in treatment between those entities adopting FRS 102, and those that may adopt the FRSSE (small entities) the Charity Commission has issued two new SORPS, one for charities that cannot use small entity reporting under FRSSE (to be referred to as FRS 102 SORP), and one for those that can (to be referred to as the FRSSE SORP). As with FRS 102, the new SORPs must be applied to accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2015. This date is known as the ‘Transition Date’. Hence the first set of accounts prepared under the new SORP will be Years Ending 31/12/15, although in most cases this will be Years Ending 31/3/2016. So when drawing up the 31/12/15 or 31/3/16 financial statements, the comparative figures, i.e. either 31/12/14 or 31/3/15, will be amended to apply the new SORP. If a charity is small then it could choose to adopt the FRSSE SORP, but larger charities have no choice but to adopt the FRS102 SORP. Small charities are those who meet at least 2 of the following 3 indicators;
Total Income < £6.5m Gross Assets < £3.26m Employees <50
In a departure from the existing SORP, the new versions are modular in format; there are core modules relevant to all charities, covering areas such as the trustees' annual report, fund accounting (restricted and unrestricted funds), primary statements, general income and expenditure and the balance sheet. There are then specialist modules for certain types of charities, such as companies, or charities undertaking particular activities, such as joint ventures, grant making, or those holding heritage assets. The specialist guidance also covers investments, social investments, branches, groups and mergers.
Charity Commission has produced a very useful set of help sheets (see http://www.charitysorp.org/about-the-sorp/helpsheets/) which includes mapping the main differences between the existing SORP and the new requirements, and those between FRS 102 SORP and the FRSSE version. FRSSE SORP. While FRS 102 is a game-changer for large charities, for small charities which apply the FRSSE there is currently little difference between the current FRSSE and FRSSE 2015* (*the standard due to come into effect in 2015). However one apparently small difference is crucial. FRSSE 2015 requires relevant entities to have regard to the public benefit entity (PBE) requirements in FRS 102. Crucially these include provisions on donations/legacies, concessionary loans and charity mergers. As a result, in all these areas the FRSSE SORP follows FRS 102. Apart from this, charities which have applied the FRSSE in their accounts before the new SORP comes into effect can continue with those existing accounting policies not covered by the FRSSE or new SORP (para. 3.28), provided that the policies are consistent with “accepted” accounting practice (i.e. the current FRSSE 2008). A good example of this is the treatment of multi-employer pension schemes - see later. Charities that have not previously applied FRSSE accounting policies will need to apply the new SORP’s accounting policies in full. One important consideration is the intention to bring the FRSSE into line with FRS 102 (possibly by abolishing the FRSSE and introducing small entity provisions into FRS 102); when this happens charities will need to change their accounting policies accordingly. This is likely to happen in 2016, potentially meaning that any charity seeking to apply the FRSSE SORP in 2015, would then need to change again in 2016. We would advise charities who can choose between the two SORPs to leave a definite decision until nearer the time that the first new SORP accounts are prepared; by then it is likely that the future of the FRSSE, and the FRSSE SORP, will be much clearer.
3 TAITWALKER.CO.UK
AREA CHANGE AND IMPLICATION IMPACT AT TRANSITION
Must, Should & May: One key change in the new SORPs is that the SORP Committee has made an effort to distinguish between
compulsory accounting policies (and disclosures) and recommended practice or simple suggestions. It has
done so by using the three words “must”, “should” and “may”. These words are used liberally in the new
SORPs and have their normal meanings. It is therefore important to read carefully, because only the “must”
points are mandatory. An example of this is the position with going concern disclosures where charities
“must” explain in the accounts if there are material uncertainties (paras. 3.40/3.38). On the other hand,
such uncertainties merely “should” be explained in the Trustees’ Annual Report (paras. 1.24/1.23).
Irrespective of which SORP you apply, you need to determine whether you are a ‘small’ or ‘large’ charity.
Small charities are those which are not subject to statutory audit (i.e. incomes <£500k). Not to be confused
with those financial indicators (as shown in the introduction) which help decide which SORP you apply.
Determining which SORP you
will follow will impact upon
your approach.
Application of Must, Should
and May within either SORP is
then applied depending on
whether you are small or large
i.e. subject to statutory audit or
not.
TRUSTEES ANNUAL REPORT
(TAR)
Risk Policy: The statement on risk for larger charities has been extended to include disclosure of principal risks and
uncertainties facing the charity and plans for their mitigation, aligning charity reporting with company law
requirements
Reserve Policy: Where there is no reserves policy in the TAR or the Trustees have agreed that holding reserves is
unnecessary, then charities need to explain this (paras. 1.23/1.22). Additionally, larger charities are
encouraged (“should”) to provide significantly more information about their reserves (paras. 1.49/1.48).
Prior to transition, it may be that trustees want to set up designated reserves in recognition of liabilities that
will arise e.g. holiday pay accrual, pension deficit after the charity transitions and adopts the new standard.
Consider whether any
designated reserves are
desired to mitigate where
future liabilities will arise under
FRS102
Remuneration & Social
Investment Policies:
Other changes for “larger” charities include the requirement to disclose:
1. The arrangements for setting the pay and remuneration of the charity’s key management personnel
(essentially trustees and senior management) and any benchmarks, parameters or criteria used in
setting their pay, must be disclosed; and
2. An explanation of social investment policies and how any programme related investments
contributed to the achievement of the charity’s aims and objectives.
T H E C H A R I T I E S ’ S T A T E M E N T O F R E C O M M E N D E D P R A C T I C E ( S O R P )
4 TAITWALKER.CO.UK
AREA CHANGE AND IMPLICATION IMPACT AT TRANSITION
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SoFA:
Some terminology and
presentations are changing:
Whilst for companies (and therefore any trading subsidiaries) the Statement of Total Recognised Gains and
Losses (STRGL) will be replaced by a Statement of Comprehensive Income, either as a separate Statement
of Comprehensive Income or immediately after the Profit and Loss Account, charities applying either SORP
will continue to present a single SoFA (Statement of Financial Activity) which includes recognised gains and
losses.
A Statement of Historical Profits and Losses in your financial statements will not be required.
Investment Gains / Losses: In the SoFA, for those applying the FRS102 SORP, unrealised investment gains or losses will be included as
part of incoming or outgoing resources, instead of as "Other gains and losses", below the total for incoming
or outgoing resources. But this is unchanged in the FRSSE SORP.
Cashflow Statement: The format of cash flow statements will become simpler with cash flows being classified as resulting from
operating activities, financing activities and operating activities, as opposed to the eight different categories
currently used in UK GAAP.
A cashflow statement is a mandatory requirement under FRS102 SORP, where it is not required if applying
the FRSSE SORP.
If preparing a cashflow for the
first time, collecting prior year
opening balances to assist in
preparation would be useful.
Prior Period Adjustments: As well as changes in accounting policy, prior period adjustments under FRS 102 will be required for
correction of 'material errors'. A material error is considered to be a much lower requirement than a
'fundamental error' (the measure under current UK GAAP). Material errors, in future, will not be recognised
in the current year but corrected by restatement of the comparative accounts. This could lead to a higher
number of prior year adjustments being made to financial statements.
Bank Covenants:
It is very important that you review the potential changes under the new SORP, to consider whether these
will have an impact upon any bank covenants.
If any potential breaches to covenants are identified these will need to be discussed with the bank as soon
as possible.
Income: FRS 102 has new income recognition rules. We would expect that in certain cases e.g. legacies, income
might be recognised earlier than at present because income will be recognised when it is 'probable'.
Revisit income cut-off and
determine whether this would
change e.g. legacy income.
T H E C H A R I T I E S ’ S T A T E M E N T O F R E C O M M E N D E D P R A C T I C E ( S O R P )
5 TAITWALKER.CO.UK
AREA CHANGE AND IMPLICATION IMPACT AT TRANSITION
ACCOUNTING FOR ASSETS
Investments & Fixed Assets:
Motivation for holding
Charities will be required to determine what their motivation is in holding their investments, i.e. whether it
is to further the charity's financial return, or to further its charitable objective.
Those charities that hold properties for mixed purposes, i.e. partly for occupation by the charity and partly
as investment, are expected to apportion the values of such properties accordingly. This includes situations
where a charitable group may lease a property to one of its subsidiary companies. The company leasing the
property may have to deal with the property as an investment property in its own accounts, but in the
group accounts this is then changed and incorporated as a normal fixed asset.
Review investments and
properties held at the
transition date and determine
their use.
Valuations may be required at
the transition date for any
investment properties.
Revalued Fixed Assets:
Guidance suggest valuation of
land & buildings may be more
frequent than other assets.
FRS 102 relaxes the requirements for revaluation of land and buildings. Instead of the absolute requirement
in current UK GAAP of an independent valuation every fifth year, with at least a review of the valuation on
the third year, there is a general requirement that revaluations are carried out with “sufficient regularity” to
ensure the carrying value does not differ materially from the fair value at the end of the reporting period.
Care will be needed to justify this if a valuation has not been carried out within the last five years.
The SORP also notes that whilst an external valuation is preferred, that a member of staff with “sufficient
knowledge of the market” can be used.
Revalued Fixed Assets: The valuation basis has also changed. Land and buildings will now be valued at fair value, not open market
value on an existing use basis. This may affect the valuation of certain assets, perhaps where redevelopment
costs of an asset have been capitalised. Specialised properties can continue to use the depreciated
replacement cost basis.
Deferred tax will be recognised in full on revaluation of fixed assets where an entity is subject to
Corporation Tax. This represents a significant change, but is less likely to be an issue for charities, except
where a subsidiary pays tax if is unable to Gift Aid its profits to its charitable parent.
Consider whether any market
valuations held at the transition
dates would alter using a Fair
Value basis.
Fixed Assets:
Deemed Cost option
You will have the option, on first time adoption of FRS 102, to take the carrying value of a fixed asset
(whether held previously at cost or revaluation) and hold it at deemed cost. Where it was held at cost this
will result in a one off revaluation but does not comprise a policy of revaluation; regular revaluations will not
be required in future.
Determine your policy choice
going forwards i.e. locking off
previous valuations, or uplifting
cost at transition.
T H E C H A R I T I E S ’ S T A T E M E N T O F R E C O M M E N D E D P R A C T I C E ( S O R P )
6 TAITWALKER.CO.UK
AREA CHANGE AND IMPLICATION IMPACT AT TRANSITION
ACCOUNTING FOR ASSETS
Fixed Assets:
Useful Economic Life (UEL) of
an Asset
Unlike under the current accounting standard (UK GAAP) there will be no limit to the expected useful life of
a fixed asset, which would trigger the requirement for a full annual impairment review if the accounting
policy stated a longer depreciation period. Currently an impairment review is needed if the UEL exceeds 50
years, so it is common for maximum life to be set at 50 years. So whilst It will no longer be ‘prohibited’ to
have an expected useful life of say 100 years for buildings, care would be needed in the justification of a
long life.
Consider the policy and
determine any impact of
making a change to the UEL of
the asset.
Fixed Assets:
Present Value of delayed
payments for Fixed Assets
Acquired
Where payment for property, plant or equipment is deferred significantly to a future period, cost will be
recognised at the present value of future cash flows.
Determine whether any Fixed
Assets previously capitalised at
the transition date were on a
deferred payment basis.
Intangible Assets:
Software or website
development costs
Software or website development costs would normally have been classified as part of fixed assets under
current UK GAAP. On adoption of FRS 102, these will be reclassified as intangible assets. The lower
threshold for recognising internally generated intangibles should mean on-going spending on software or
website development costs are more likely to be able to be capitalised than before.
Intangible Fixed Assets:
Recognition
Expenditure on intangible assets after the transition date to FRS 102 may be capitalised. Expenditure prior
to transition under present UK GAAP cannot be recognised under FRS 102.
Intangible Fixed Assets:
Revaluation
Your intangible assets may be revalued to their fair value, but as under current UK GAAP this can only occur
if there is an active market to establish that value. The revalued amount is then subject to amortisation in
the usual manner.
The option to revalue does not
permit an entity to attach a
value to an asset that has not
previously been recognised.
Heritage Fixed Assets: The heritage asset accounting rules have been rolled forward into FRS 102 virtually unchanged. We would
not expect any change to the treatment of your heritage assets on transition to FRS 102.
T H E C H A R I T I E S ’ S T A T E M E N T O F R E C O M M E N D E D P R A C T I C E ( S O R P )
7 TAITWALKER.CO.UK
AREA CHANGE AND IMPLICATION IMPACT AT TRANSITION
ACCOUNTING FOR LIABILITIES
AND LEASES
Lease Accounting: There are no significant changes to lease accounting. Leases will still be capitalised as finance leases if
substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership are transferred.
The current 90% of value test will no longer be required. If leases do not meet the definition of a finance
lease, they will be classified as an operating lease with the charge going through the SoFA.
On first time adoption, you
have the option to reassess
whether any lease
arrangements are finance lease
or operating leases based on
the facts at the transition date.
Lease Incentives:
Spread over a longer period
Lease incentives received used to be spread over the period up to the point where a change could be made.
For example any rent incentive would usually only be spread to the first break clause period or when market
rent became payable. This had the effect of giving a lower rent charge in the SoFA during the initial part of
the lease, followed by a stepped higher rent charge in later periods.
Under FRS 102, the incentive received will be spread over the most likely term of the lease. The charge
against income each year may be smaller as a result, spreading the incentive to reduce the charge to the
SoFA over a longer period and giving a more equally spread charge.
Although in many cases incentives are currently being recognised over the entire term, in which case the
change to FRS102 may not have any real impact.
Consider any lease incentive
being spread at transition and
consider the impact of
changing the spread basis
based on the facts at the
transition date.
Liabilities Due More Than One
Year:
Present Value
FRS 102 requires loans and similar transactions which have a payment period in excess of one year to be
recognised at their fair value.
Fair Value is measured at the present value of the future cash flows discounted at a commercial rate of
interest. These rules apply to inter-company loans.
The amount recognised in the Balance Sheet will be less than the sum borrowed and the financing cost will
be released to the SoFA over the period of the loan.
You should review the existing
loans and their terms with a
view to evaluating the effect
this might have.
You will want to be prepared
with market rates of interest
for the year and comparative
year.
T H E C H A R I T I E S ’ S T A T E M E N T O F R E C O M M E N D E D P R A C T I C E ( S O R P )
8 TAITWALKER.CO.UK
AREA CHANGE AND IMPLICATION IMPACT AT TRANSITION
ACCOUNTING FOR LIABILITIES
AND LEASES
Liabilities Due More Than One
Year:
Inter-group loans
Where there is no written agreement for long term inter-group loans and there is no interest being
charged, then FRS102 may give rise to a need to hold these balances at their present value.
Similarly with other loans, the inter-group loan would need to be held at its present value where interest
being charged on these loans is less than the overall charity’s borrowing costs.
Any changes are only required if they are material, but the onus is on the trustees (directors) to prove this
one way or the other.
You should review the existing
loans and their terms with a
view to evaluating the effect
this might have.
You will want to be prepared
with market rates of interest
for the year and comparative
year.
T H E C H A R I T I E S ’ S T A T E M E N T O F R E C O M M E N D E D P R A C T I C E ( S O R P )
9 TAITWALKER.CO.UK
AREA CHANGE AND IMPLICATION IMPACT AT TRANSITION
FINANCIAL INSTUMENTS
Government Grants: Accounting for government grants under FRS 102 will be largely unchanged from the existing UK GAAP.
There will be two choices of recognition policy - a performance model or an accrual model. We note the
accrual method will not be available for charities as government grants continue to be unable to be
accrued, which is the same as their current treatment.
Subsidiary companies of charities, applying FRS102, have a choice of either method.
Employee Benefits: The basic principle under FRS 102 is that employee benefits, such as holiday pay, will be recognised as a cost
as entitlement to the benefit is earned. This will mean that holiday entitlement not taken at the Balance
Sheet date will need to be provided for if material.
This applies to other benefits, for example sabbaticals after (say) 10yrs service or sick leave. Entitlement to
the benefit will be recognised as it is earned. Due to the long term nature of these benefits, the amount
recognised will be at the expected present value of the liability.
This will require computation
of the accrual at the transition
date, at the comparative
period end and at the period
end.
Or consideration should be
given to aligning holiday
periods with the financial year
end and limiting carry forward
of holidays.
T H E C H A R I T I E S ’ S T A T E M E N T O F R E C O M M E N D E D P R A C T I C E ( S O R P )
10 TAITWALKER.CO.UK
AREA CHANGE AND IMPLICATION IMPACT AT TRANSITION
EXPENDITURE & OUTGOINGS
Multi-employer Pension
Schemes:
Where the charity is a participant in a multi-employer pension scheme, under current treatment the
contributions paid may only be recognised on a contributions (paid) basis. The current payments may also
include ‘strain’ of ‘past deficit’ payments.
Under FRS102 these schemes are likely to crystallise a liability at the balance sheet date. Where the actuary
can split the scheme to apportion the charity’s share of assets and liabilities this should be requested.
Otherwise, the continue to be treated as contribution schemes. The main difference is that any element
which includes a ‘past deficit’ payment should be recognised at the balance sheet date. For example, if
£1,000 is being paid monthly for the next 10 years, then a liability of £120,000 should be recognised
(although this would need to be recognised at its Fair Value and discounted accordingly).
An actuary report may need to
be requested at the transition
date where it can be split.
Review any such scheme
pension payments and
correspondence regarding
‘past deficit payments’.
Calculate the liability at the
transition date.
Key Management Personnel: There will be a new requirement to disclose total key management personnel remuneration. Please note
this is a single aggregate disclosure and does not require disclosure of who the key management personnel
actually are. Key management personnel continue to be related parties and names will need disclosure if
there are any balances or transactions (other than salary) with them.
Consider who are Key
Management Personnel and
calculate disclosure data for
the comparative year following
transition.
T H E C H A R I T I E S ’ S T A T E M E N T O F R E C O M M E N D E D P R A C T I C E ( S O R P )
11 TAITWALKER.CO.UK
CONTACT For further information, please contact our Head of Not-for-Profit, Simon Brown on 0191 285 0321 or email [email protected]
OFFICE LOCATIONS AND CONTACT DETAILS
1. Newcastle upon Tyne Bulman House Regent Centre Gosforth Newcastle upon Tyne. NE3 3LS Tel (+44) 0191 285 0321 Fax (+44) 0191 284 9117 DX 603 68 2. Northumberland 10 Manchester Street Morpeth Northumberland. NE61 1BH Tel (+44) 01670 513 106 Fax (+44) 01670 504 064 DX 62514 3. Tees Valley Medway House Fudan Way Teesdale Park Stockton on Tees. TS17 6EN Tel (+44) 01642 676 8888 Fax (+44) 01642 605 866
Visit our website at www.taitwalker.co.uk
Follow us on Twitter
Follow us on LinkedIn
Further guides and information can be found online at our Publication pages: http://www.taitwalker.co.uk/resources/not-for-profit/
TAITWALKER.CO.UK
TAIT WALKER