Charity Law Reform Alma Clissmann Law Reform Committee Law Society.

22
Charity Law Reform Alma Clissmann Law Reform Committee Law Society

Transcript of Charity Law Reform Alma Clissmann Law Reform Committee Law Society.

Page 1: Charity Law Reform Alma Clissmann Law Reform Committee Law Society.

Charity Law Reform

Alma ClissmannLaw Reform Committee

Law Society

Page 2: Charity Law Reform Alma Clissmann Law Reform Committee Law Society.

Context

• Law Reform Committee

• Origin of project

• Publication of report July 2002

• Consultation paper Autumn 2003

Page 3: Charity Law Reform Alma Clissmann Law Reform Committee Law Society.

Aspects of Charity Law

• Definition• Registration and regulation• Fundraising• Legal structures• Responsibilities of trustees• Investment of charitable funds• Rates

Page 4: Charity Law Reform Alma Clissmann Law Reform Committee Law Society.

Importance of a well designed classification

• Giving charities a special public status, attracting public support

• Safeguarding the integrity of this special status by ensuring it is granted fairly, consistently and transparently

• Sustaining support for charities by ensuring resources are spent on public goods and not personal gain

• Encouraging private donations and tax incentives

Page 5: Charity Law Reform Alma Clissmann Law Reform Committee Law Society.

Benefits of revising legislation

• Clearer classification of charity aids transparency and allows the concept of charity to evolve

• Introduction of registration and regulation provides a framework to support the sector and increase public confidence

• Special legal structure to assist in administration• Striking a balance of what is reasonable

responsibility for charity trustees• More flexible investment powers based on

principle, not rules

Page 6: Charity Law Reform Alma Clissmann Law Reform Committee Law Society.

Definition of Charity• The current position (last

formulated 1891)• To be charitable, an organisation

must:– be exclusively charitable and– relieve poverty or– advance education or – advance religion or– have some other purpose beneficial to

the community and have public benefit

Page 7: Charity Law Reform Alma Clissmann Law Reform Committee Law Society.

Problems with current definition

• Mismatch between legal definition and everyday perception of ‘charity’

• Few opportunities for courts to comment upon and develop definition in line with modern usage

• Concept of public benefit applies inconsistently between categories

• Last category is vague and amorphous

Page 8: Charity Law Reform Alma Clissmann Law Reform Committee Law Society.

Underlying thinking

• John Finnis’ analysis, 1980

• Human goods: basic forms of

flourishing to be pursued and

realised in all practical activity

• Self evident and underived human

goods

Page 9: Charity Law Reform Alma Clissmann Law Reform Committee Law Society.

Self evident human goods (1)

• Life, including health, road safety, famine relief, environment

• Knowledge, including education and research

• Play, including amateur sport, bingo, walking, whale spotting

• Aesthetic experience, including the arts, dramatic societies, choirs

Page 10: Charity Law Reform Alma Clissmann Law Reform Committee Law Society.

Self evident human goods (2)

• Friendship, including community activities, social cohesion and harmony

• Religion, including spiritual life

• Practical reasonableness, including self help groups, work

Page 11: Charity Law Reform Alma Clissmann Law Reform Committee Law Society.

Proposals on definition (1)

• New statutory guidelines on what constitutes a charity, drawing on comparative international research

• Advancement of social and community welfare [new]

• Advancement of education• Advancement of culture• Advancement of religion

Page 12: Charity Law Reform Alma Clissmann Law Reform Committee Law Society.

Proposals on definition (2)

• Advancement of health [new]• Advancement of the natural

environment [new]• Other purposes beneficial to the

community (including human rights and animal rights)

• Public benefit, including a reference to ‘altruism’, should apply consistently across the heads of charity

Page 13: Charity Law Reform Alma Clissmann Law Reform Committee Law Society.

Registration and regulation

• No register of charities• Responsibility for charities spread

between a number of statutory bodies

• No efficient regulation of the sector• No requirements to file accounts,

other than for companies• Resulting lack of credibility for the

public and for donors

Page 14: Charity Law Reform Alma Clissmann Law Reform Committee Law Society.

Proposals on registration and regulation

• Creation of independent statutory office, the Registrar of Charities, to be supported by an Advisory Board, together to be known as the Charities Office

• Through creation of a register of charities, the Charities Office to fulfil the dual role of registration and regulation

Page 15: Charity Law Reform Alma Clissmann Law Reform Committee Law Society.

Registration - who and why?

• All charities with a minimum turnover must register, bringing transparency and accountability to the sector

• The Register should be open to the public, providing objectives and contact details of each charity

• All charities to file accounts using a version of SORP

Page 16: Charity Law Reform Alma Clissmann Law Reform Committee Law Society.

Charities Office powers

• Provide support and assistance to the sector

• Maintain register and grant charitable status

• Develop the definition of charity by reasoned and published decisions

• Develop standards and guidelines for the better administration of charities

• Investigate complaints and do routine inspections

Page 17: Charity Law Reform Alma Clissmann Law Reform Committee Law Society.

Proposals on fundraising• Costello and Advisory Committee

(Burton) reports• Stakeholders to develop best

practice guidelines for fundraising and a system of self certification, in the manner of QA

• Charitable street trading should be regulated in line with street collections

• Sales or promotions should state percentage going to associated charity

Page 18: Charity Law Reform Alma Clissmann Law Reform Committee Law Society.

Proposals on legal structures• Create a separate legal entity for

charities - the CIO or Incorporated Charity

• Create model governing instruments for three main types of organisation, and statutory default powers

• Statutory basis for rules of membership, terms of office, meetings and proceedings, personal/conflicts of interest, benefits, record keeping, amendment of governing instrument, dissolution and merger

Page 19: Charity Law Reform Alma Clissmann Law Reform Committee Law Society.

Proposals on charity trustees

• Qualifications/disqualifications for trustees

• Statutory powers for trustees, regardless of legal structure

• New statutory duty of care, regardless of legal structure

• The duty of care should reflect any special knowledge, skill or experience which the trustee professes to have

Page 20: Charity Law Reform Alma Clissmann Law Reform Committee Law Society.

Proposals on investment powers (1)

• Statutory codification of duties of investment owed by charity trustees, based on principles of prudential investment (suitability, risk, diversity and appropriateness)

• Trustee (Authorised Investments) Order 1998 (Amendment) Order 2002, SI 595/02

Page 21: Charity Law Reform Alma Clissmann Law Reform Committee Law Society.

Proposals on investment powers (2)

• Subject to a contrary intention in the trust, the same power to invest as if the trustees were themselves entitled to the trust assets

• Statutory exoneration should apply to trustees against any liability for loss due to poor investment performance arising out of the exercise of the statutory power reasonably, honestly and in good faith

Page 22: Charity Law Reform Alma Clissmann Law Reform Committee Law Society.

Beyond charity law reform

• The voluntary sector

• The non-profit sector

• The EU dimension

Thank You