Chapter5 Supplement Teamdynamics

8/18/2019 Chapter5 Supplement Teamdynamics

1/21

Group and Team Dynamics

(Supplement: Chapter 5 ProcessImprovement Team)

IndM4!" (IndM 4#"$Chapter %)


2/21

Group Dynamics

&hat is Group Dynamics'

Social process here small roups

interact*

Collective e++ect that individuals have

on each other*

Sense o+ ,elonins

-ey to Group Dynamics:Interaction. interdependence and

communication


3/21

Group

&hat is roup' To or more people ho are psycholoically

aare o+ each other and ho interact to +ul+ill

a common goal * /ive dimension o+ roups*

%* Primary and secondary

* /ormal and in+ormal

!* 0eteroeneous and homoeneous

4* Interactin and nominal1

5* Temporary and permanent


4/21

Groups versus Teams

&hat is a Team'0avin mem,ers ho share the same goals

Share leadership roles

Products produced 2 colla,orative ones*Provides +eed,ac3

De+ined set o+ oals (productivity. mem,er

satis+action and personal roth)

ideo clips: Turtle and ra,,it

https:*youtu,e*comatch'v6nD#t78p%ls


5/21

Group Development

Process ta3es time and e++ort on eachmem,ers*

/ive stae model/orminStormin9ormin

Per+ormin d;ournin (May ,e)


6/21

Tuc3man


7/21

9orms

alues that a roup develops 2

e=pected ,ehavior o+ individuals in the

roup or team* >nce developed 2 ,ecome the rules*

7sually unritten*

8=amples: ircra+t. automotiveassem,lers*


8/21

Group Composition

&hy are e attracted to some individuals'

Sharin common tas3 oals* Similar attitudes. opinions. ,ehavior. oals.

ae. education. and personality*

Continue e=posure and interaction


9/21

Si?e o+ Group

&hich is easier to or3 ith: ! or %#

individuals'

5 @A individuals may +unction e++ectively

>ver A individuals

Bo participants tal3 less

/ormal and eal interaction decreases

Meetin /T/ vs irtually impact

e++ectiveness*


10/21

Comple=ity o+ Interaction in Small and Bare Groups

Tuc3er. M. McCarthy.. Eenton. D* ("")* The 0uman Challene* 9e ;ersey. Prentice 0all*


11/21

Group Cohesiveness

Three +actors:

mount o+ interaction

8=tent to the mem,er share the same

mission and oalsDeree o+ personal attraction

8motions

8motional con+lict (voidance. ithdraal)FI don


12/21

Group Consensus

rrive at a solution that is accepta,le

to most roup mem,ers*

Communication and 0ard or3* Positive vs 9eative Consensus

/ocus on underlyin o,;ectives. rather

+orcin them to de+end*


13/21

Group oles

Shared e=pectation o+ mem,ers<

per+ormance in their position*

Tas3$related roles

Maintenance$related roles

Individual roles


14/21

ole Prescriptions and ole

Eehaviors &hat e say and do 8=pected to do: P

ctual do: E E 6 P 6 8++ective or success+ul P: set o+ e=pectations a++ect a particular

role*

Doin as other


15/21

ole m,iuity and ole

Con+lict ole m,iuity: 8mployees lac3s a clear

understandin o+ e=pectations*

ole con+lict: e=pectations con+lict ith

each otheremployee


16/21

Types o+ 9on+unctional

GroupTeam ,ehavior

Types o+ non+unctional roup

,ehavior*

9>T8: In some circumstances. these,ehaviors may ,e help+ul to the roup

activities*


17/21

Sel+$Manaed &or3 Teams

8mpoers employees* llo decision ma3in* Participative. Bess hierarchical. ithout

e=ternal supervision* Team is responsi,le +or:0irinDisciplinin team mem,ersCoordinatin or3+loTrainin employeesCoordination ith the company *


18/21

Sel+$Manaed &or3 Teams (Cont


19/21

Sel+$Manaed &or3 Teams (Cont


20/21

Group Phenomena

Groupthin3

Thin3 ali3e 2 inhi,it alternative points o+

vie

/ear +or ,rea3in up the cohesiveness

Sel+$censorship

Creates a sense o+ in+alli,ility

is3y Shi+t&illinness to endorse ris3y decisions


21/21

Discussion uestions

&hat determines roup e++ectiveness'

Chapter5 Supplement Teamdynamics

Documents

Transcript of Chapter5 Supplement Teamdynamics