Chapter013

44
Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 13 Data Collection Methods

Transcript of Chapter013

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Chapter 13

Data Collection Methods

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Data Collection Plan

Basic decision is use of:

• New data, collected specifically for research purposes, or

• Existing data

– Records (e.g., patient charts)

– Historical data

– Existing data set (secondary analysis)

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Examples of Records, Documents, and Available Data

• Hospital records (e.g., nurses’ shift reports)

• School records (e.g., student absenteeism)

• Corporate records (e.g., health insurance choices)

• Letters, diaries, minutes of meetings, etc.

• Photographs

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Major Types of Data Collection Methods

• Self-reports

• Observation

• Biophysiologic measures

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Dimensions of Data Collection Approaches

•Structure

•Quantifiability

•Researcher obtrusiveness

•Objectivity

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Types of Qualitative Self-Reports

• Unstructured interviews

– Conversational, totally flexible

– Use of grand tour questions

• Semistructured interviews

– Use of a topic guide

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Types of Qualitative Self-Reports (cont.)

• Focus group interviews

– Interviews in small groups (5 to 10 people)

– Led by a moderator

• Life histories

– Narrative self-descriptions of life experiences

– Often a chronology

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Types of Qualitative Self-Reports (cont.)

• Critical incidents interviews

– Focuses on specific incidents that had a discernible impact on some outcome

• Think-aloud method

– Means of collecting data about cognitive processes as they unfold (e.g., clinical decision-making)

• Diaries and journals

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Question

Is the following statement True or False?

• A focus group typically involves at least 10 to 15 people.

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Answer

• False

– A focus group usually involves interviews with small groups, ranging in size from 5 to 10 people.

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Structured Self-Reports

• Data are collected with a formal instrument.

– Interview schedule

•Questions are prespecified but asked orally.

•Either face-to-face or by telephone

– Questionnaire

•Questions prespecified in written form, to be self-administered by respondents

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Types of Questions in a Structured Instrument

• Closed-ended (fixed alternative) questions

– e.g., “Within the past 6 months, were you ever a member of a fitness center or gym?” (yes/no)

• Open-ended questions

– e.g., “Why did you decide to join a fitness center or gym?”

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Specific Types of Closed-Ended Questions

• Dichotomous questions

• Multiple-choice questions

• Cafeteria questions

• Rank-order questions

• Forced-choice questions

• Rating questions

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Advantages of Questionnaires (Compared with Interviews)

• Lower costs

• Possibility of anonymity, greater privacy

• Lack of interviewer bias

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Advantages of Interviews (Compared with Questionnaires)

• Higher response rates

• Appropriate for more diverse audiences

• Opportunities to clarify questions or to determine comprehension

• Opportunity to collect supplementary data through observation

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Question

Which of the following would be an advantage of using a questionnaire?

a. Higher response rates

b. Diversity of audience is not a problem.

c. Less potential for interviewer bias

d. Questions can be clarified if needed.

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Answer

c. Less potential for interviewer bias

• When a questionnaire is used, there is lack of interviewer bias along with greater privacy and possible anonymity. Higher response rates are obtained with interviews. Interviews also are appropriate for more diverse audiences and provide opportunities to clarify questions or determine comprehension.

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Composite Psychosocial Scales

• Scales—used to make fine quantitative discriminations among people with different attitudes, perceptions, traits

• Likert scales—summated rating scales

• Semantic differential scales

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Likert Scales

• Consist of several declarative statements (items) expressing viewpoints

• Responses are on an agree/disagree continuum (usually 5 or 7 response options).

• Responses to items are summed to compute a total scale score.

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Semantic Differential Scales

• Require ratings of various concepts

• Rating scales involve bipolar adjective pairs, with 7-point ratings.

• Ratings for each dimension are summed to compute a total score for each concept.

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Example of a Semantic Differential

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

• Used to measure subjective experiences (e.g., pain, nausea)

• Measurements are on a straight line measuring 100 mm

• End points labeled as extreme limits of sensation

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Response Set Biases• Biases reflecting the tendency of some

people to respond to items in characteristic ways, independently of item content

• Examples:

– Social desirability response set bias

– Extreme response set

– Acquiescence response set (yea- sayers)

– Nay-sayers response set

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Question

Is the following statement True or False?

• A Likert scale would be appropriate for measuring a person’s pain.

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Answer

• False

– A visual analog scale would be more appropriate to use when measuring a person’s pain.

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Q Sorts

• Participants sort a deck of cards into piles according to specific criteria.

• Cards contain statements to be sorted on a bipolar continuum (e.g., most like me/least like me).

• Usually 50 to 100 cards; usually 9 or 11 piles

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Vignettes

• Brief descriptions of situations to which respondents are asked to react

• Descriptions are usually written “stories.”

• Respondents can be asked open-ended or closed-ended questions about their reactions.

• Aspects of the vignettes can be experimentally manipulated.

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Evaluation of Self-Reports

• Strong on directness

• Allows access to information otherwise not available to researchers

• But can we be sure participants actually feel or act the way they say they do?

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Phenomena Amenable to Research Observation

• Activities and behavior

• Characteristics and conditions of individuals

• Skill attainment and performance

• Verbal and nonverbal communication

• Environmental characteristics

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Observation in Qualitative and Quantitative Studies

• Qualitative studies: Unstructured observation in naturalistic settings

– Includes Participant observation

• Quantitative studies: Structured observation of prespecified behaviors

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

The Observer–Participant Role in Participant Observation

• Leininger’s Four-Phase Sequence:

– Primarily observation

– Primarily observation with some participation

– Primarily participation with some observation

– Reflective observation

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Question

Is the following statement True or False?

• In qualitative studies, observation is unstructured.

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Answer

• True

– Observation with a qualitative study is unstructured and occurs in naturalistic settings.

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Recording Unstructured Observations• Logs (field diaries)

• Field notes

– Descriptive (observational) notes

– Reflective notes:

•Methodologic notes

•Theoretical notes (or analytical notes)

•Personal notes

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Structured Observations• Category systems ⇒⇒⇒ Checklists

– Formal systems for systematically recording the incidence or frequency of prespecified behaviors or events

– Systems vary in their exhaustiveness

•Exhaustive system: All behaviors of a specific type recorded, and each behavior is assigned to one mutually exclusive category

•Nonexhaustive system: Specific behaviors, but not all behaviors, recorded

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Observational Rating Scales

• Ratings are on a descriptive continuum, typically bipolar

• Ratings can occur:

– at specific intervals

– upon the occurrence of certain events

– after an observational session (global ratings)

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Observational Sampling

• Time-sampling—sampling of time intervals for observation

Examples:

•Random sampling of intervals of a given length

•Systematic sampling of intervals of a given length

• Event sampling—observation of integral events

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Evaluation of Observational Methods

• Excellent method for capturing many clinical phenomena and behaviors

• Potential problem of reactivity when people are aware that they are being observed

• Risk of observational biases—factors that can interfere with objective observation

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Biophysiologic Measures

• In vivo measurements

– Performed directly within or on living organisms (e.g., blood pressure measures)

• In vitro measurements

– Performed outside the organism’s body (e.g., urinalysis)

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Question

Which of the following would be classified as an in vivo biophysiologic measure?

a. Tissue biopsy

b. Blood glucose level

c. Bacterial culture

d. Body temperature

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Answer

d. Body temperature

– In vivo measures are those performed directly within or on living organisms, such as blood pressure, body temperature, and vital capacity measurement. Tissue biopsy, blood glucose level, and bacterial culture are examples of in vitro measures.

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Evaluation of Biophysiologic Measures

• Strong on accuracy, objectivity, validity, and precision

• May be cost-effective for nurse researchers

• But caution may be required for their use, and advanced skills may be needed for interpretation.

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

End of Presentation