Chapter V Frictionless Duct Flow with Heat Transfer
description
Transcript of Chapter V Frictionless Duct Flow with Heat Transfer
Chapter VFrictionless Duct Flow with Heat Transfer
Heat addition or removal has an interesting effect on a compress- ible flow. Here we confine the analysis to heat transfer with no friction in a constant-area duct. Consider the elemental duct control volume in Fig. 5.1. Between sections 1 and 2 an amount of heat δQ is added (or removed) to each incremental mass δm passing through. With no friction or area change, the control-volume conservation relations are quite simple.
Prof. Dr. MOHSEN OSMAN 1
)1.5........(.............................:
)21
21(.................:
)1.5)........((.............:)1.5.....(.................:
12
211
222
1221
2211
chhmQ
mQqOR
VhVhmQEnergy
bVVGPPmomentumXaconstGVVContinuity
oo
Fig. (5.1) Elemental control volume for frictionless flow in a constant-area duct with heat transfer. The length of the element is determined in this simplified theory. Control volume \ No friction A2 = A1
\ V1 , P1 , T1 , To1 V2 , P2 , T2 , To2
The heat transfer results in a change in stagnation enthalpy of the flow. We shall not specify exactly how the heat is transferred; combustion, nuclear reaction, evaporation, condensation, or wall heat exchange, but simply that it happened in amount q between 1 and 2. We remark, however, that wall heat exchange is not a good candidate for the theory because wall convection is inevitably coupled with wall friction, which we neglected. To complete the analysis we use the perfect gas and Mach-number relations.
Prof. Dr. MOHSEN OSMAN 2
)(.......,................. 0121211
1
22
2 TTChhTP
TP
oPoo
For a given heat transfer or, equivalently, a given change can besolved algebraically for the property ratios between inlet and outlet. Notethat because the heat transferallows the entropy either to increase or decrease, thesecond law imposes no restrictions on these solutions Fig.(5.2) Effect of Heat Transfer Mach number.
Prof. Dr. MOHSEN OSMAN 3
)2.5.....(....................1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
TT
MM
aa
MM
VV
mQq
)2.5..()..1.5(...,12 andEqshh oo
.,,,1
2
1
2 etcMM
PP
Before writing down these property ratio functions, we illustrate the effect of heat transfer in Fig.(5.2), which shows To and T versus Mach number in the duct.
Heating increases To , and cooling decreases it. The maximum possible To occurs at M = 1.0, and we see that heating, whether the inlet is subsonic or supersonic, drives the duct Mach number toward unity. This is analogus to the effect of friction in the previous chapter. The temperature of a perfect gas (T) increases from M = 0.0 up to and then decreases.
Thus there is a peculiar–or at least unexpected–region where heating (increasing To ) actually decreases the gas temperature, the difference being reflected in a large increase of the gas kinetic energy.
Prof. Dr. MOHSEN OSMAN 4
21
1
M
For γ = 1.4, this peculiar area lies between M = 0.845 and 1.0 (interesting but not very useful information). The complete list of effects of simple To change on duct-flow
properties is as follows:
† Increases up to M = 1/√γ and decreases thereafter.‡ Decreases up to M = 1/√γ and increases thereafter.
Prof. Dr. MOHSEN OSMAN 5
HEAT
Subsonic
INGSupersonic
COOL
Subsonic
INGSupersonic
To Increases Increases Decreases DecreasesM Increases Decreases Decreases IncreasesP Decreases Increases Increases Decreasesρ Decreases Increases Increases DecreasesV Increases Decreases Decreases IncreasesPo Decreases Decreases Increases Increasess Increases Increases Decreases DecreasesT † Increases ‡ Decreases
Probably the most significant item on this list is the stagnation pressure Po , which always decreases during heating whether the flow is subsonic or supersonic. Thus,
heating does increases the Mach number of a flow but entails a loss in effective pressure recovery.
Mach – Number Relations Equations (5.1) and (5.2) can be rearranged in terms of the Mach number and the results tabulated. For convenience we specify that the outlet section is sonic, M=1, with reference properties To*, T*, P*, ρ* , V*, and P*o . The inlet is assumed to be at arbitrary Mach number M. Eq(5.1) and (5.2) then take the following form:
Prof. Dr. MOHSEN OSMAN 6
)3.5..(....................)1(
])1(2[)1(22
22
* aM
MMTT
o
o
.. These formulas are all tabulated versus Mach number in table.
The tables are very convenient if inlet properties M1, V1, etc., are given but are somewhat cumbersome if the given inform-ation centers on To1 and To2 . Let us illustrate with an example.
Prof. Dr. MOHSEN OSMAN 7
)3.5..(..........]1)1(2[
11
)3.5......(....................1
)1(**
)3.5(........................................1
1*
)3.5....(..............................)1(
)1(*
12
2*
2
2
2
22
22
eMMP
P
dMM
VV
cMP
P
bM
MTT
o
o
Example 5.1 A fuel-air mixture, assumed thermodynamically equivalent to air with γ = 1.4, enters a duct combustion chamber at V1= 250
ft/s, P1 = 20 psia, and T1 = 530oR. The heat addition by combustion is 400 Btu per pound of mixture. Compute (a) the exit properties V2 , P2 , and T2 and (b) the total heat addition which would have caused a sonic exit flow. Solution (a) First convert the heat addition to a Duct Combustion Chamber change in To of the gas :
V1=250 ft/s Po2
P1=20 psia P2
T1=530o.R V2
To1 , Po1 T2 , To2
Prof. Dr. MOHSEN OSMAN 8RTT
TTRslug
lbftq
TTCqsluglbft
lbBtuq
sluglbft
Btu
ooo
ooof
ooP
f
f
16676010
000,020,10)(
))(.
.(6010........
)(........
...000,020,10/..400......
...25050..1.....
12
12
12
We have enough information to compute M1 and To1 :
Now use Eq.(5.3a) or interpolate into Table to find the inlet ratio corresponding to M1 = 0.222 , we get
At the exit section we can now compute To2 = To1 + 1667 = 535 + 1667 = 2202oR Thus, we can compute the exit ratio
Prof. Dr. MOHSEN OSMAN 9
222.01128250
/..112853049....49
1
11
1111
CV
M
sftCTRTC
RxC
VTT o
Po 5355530
60102)250(530
2
221
11
RTHenceTT o
oo
o 25682084.0535..................2084.0 *
*1
8575.025682202
*2 o
o
TT
From Eq.(5.3a) or interpolation into Table, we find that With inlet and exit Mach numbers known, we can tabulate the velocity, pressure, and temperature ratios as follows:
Then the exit properties are given:
Prof. Dr. MOHSEN OSMAN 10
638.02 M
)2( )1(
0.638 0.222 M
0.623 0.110
1.529 2.246
0.951 0.248
*VV
*PP
*TT
sftVVVVVV
psiaPPPPPP
/1415110.0
)623.0(250)/()/(
6.13246.2
)529.1(20)/()/(
*1
*21
2
*1
*21
2
(b) The maximum heat addition allowed without choking would drive the exit Mach number to unity...
Prof. Dr. MOHSEN OSMAN 11
lbBtuqsluglbft
q
qTTCqThus
RTT
f
ooP
oo
/488...........
.000,220,12...........
)5352568(6010...........)(...
2568
max
max
max
1*
max
*02
RTTTTTT o2030
248.0)951.0(530
)/()/(
*1
*21
2
Choking Effects Due to Simple Heating Equation (5.3a) and Table indicate that the maximum possible stagnation temperature in simple heating corresponds to , or sonic exit Mach number. Thus, for given inlet conditions, only a certain maximum amount of heat can be added to the flow, for example, 488 Btu/lb in Example 5.1. For a subsonic inlet there is no theoretical limit on heat addition; the flow chokes more and more as we add more heat, with the inlet velocity approaching zero. For supersonic flow, even if M1 is infinite, there is a finite ratio for γ = 1.4. Thus, if heat added without limit to a supersonic flow, a normal-shock-wave adjustment is required to accommodate to the required property changes. . .
Prof. Dr. MOHSEN OSMAN 12
*oT
4898.0*1 o
o
TT
224
2
*
422
22
*
21
)]1(2)[1(
21])1(2[)1(
lim
MM
MTT
MMMM
TT
o
o
M
o
o
In subsonic flow there is no theoretical limit to the amount of cooling allowed : the exit flow just becomes slower and slower, and the temperature approaches zero. In supersonic flow only a finite amount
of cooling can be allowed before the exit flow approaches infinite Mach number, with and exit temperature equals to zero. There are very few practical applications for supersonic cooling. Example 5.2 What happens to the inlet flow in Example 5.1, if the heat addition is increased to 600 Btu/lb and the inlet pressure and stagnation temperature are fixed ? What will the decrease in mass flux be ? Solution For q = 600 Btu/lb
Prof. Dr. MOHSEN OSMAN 13
4898.0* o
o
TT
q = 600(25050) = 15,025,000 (ft.lbf)/slugthe flow will be choked at an exit stagnation temperature of
… Hence and the flow will be choked down
until this value corresponds to the proper subsonic Mach number. From Eq.(5.3a) or Table for
It was specified that To1 and P1remain the same. The other inlet properties will change according to M1 :
Prof. Dr. MOHSEN OSMAN 14
Pooo C
qTTT 1*
2
RTT ooo 30352500535
6010000,025,15535*
2
,1763.03035535
*1 o
o
TT
202.0......1763.0 ,1*1 newo
o MreadandTT
31
11
111
11
21
1
..00316.0)531(1717
)144(20/..228)1129(202.0
/..11295314949....
531008.1
535)202.0(2.01
ftslug
RTP
sftCMVsftTCvelocitySonic
RTT oo
Finally, .From Example 5.1
The final result in mass flux is 9 percent less than the mass flux of 0.7912 slug/(ft2.s) in Example (5.1), due to the excess heat addition choking the flow.
Prof. Dr. MOHSEN OSMAN 15
sftslugV
Amnew
...72.0)228(00316.0 211
%97912.0
72.07912.0.......%
...7912.0...............
)250()530(1717
)144(20
2
11
reductionage
sftslug
VAm
Proof of Mach Number Relations Given:
Prof. Dr. MOHSEN OSMAN 16
12
1221
2211
)1.5.....().........(.
oo hhmQ
mQq
VVGPPconstGVV
*
2
*
2**
**
*
**
*21
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1212
11
1
22
2
11)(1
)(
.......&...........
)2.5....().........(
PV
PV
PxVVG
PP
VVGPP
PPPPLet
TT
MM
aa
MM
VV
TTChhTP
TP
ooPoo
..
Prof. Dr. MOHSEN OSMAN 17
12*
*
1*
*
12
2*
2*
2**
*
2
*
2*
*
])1()1(2[)(
]2
1[....
]2
11[....
)3.5....(....................1
1
1]1[
1
)(1
MPP
PP
PPbyDivide
MPPSince
cMP
P
MPP
MPP
PP
RTP
PV
RTV
PP
o
o
o
o
)3.5.........(])1()1(2[
)1(1 1
2
2* eMMP
P
o
o
Sincethen
Prof. Dr. MOHSEN OSMAN 18
)3.5.....(........................................)1(
)1(
][....
)(...........1
....
....
22
22
*
2*
2*
*21
****
***
**
*
11
1
22
2
bM
MTT
PPM
TTOR
PP
TTM
TTthen
TTM
VVSince
PP
VV
TTOR
TP
TP
TP
TP
21
22
22
*
*
*
*
])1(
)1([
1
MMM
VV
TTM
VV
..
Relationship to the Normal-Shock Wave The normal-shock-wave relations of chapter 3 actually lurk within the simple heating relations as a special case. From Table or Fig.(5.2) we see that for a given stagnation temper- ature less than T*o these are two flow satisfy the simple
Prof. Dr. MOHSEN OSMAN 19
)3.5.(..........)1(
])1(2[)1(
)1(])1(2[)(
)1()1(2
212
11
)3.5.(..........)1(
)1(
22
22
*
2
**
2*
*
*
*
2
2
2*
*
aM
MMTT
MTT
TT
MTT
TTTT
MTT
dMM
VV
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
heating relations, one subsonic and the other supersonic. These two states have : (1) the same value of To , (2) the same mass flow per unit area, and (3) the same value of P+ρV2 .
Therefore, these two states are exactly equivalent to the conditions on each side of normal-shock wave. The second law would again require that the upstream flow M1 be supersonic. To illustrate this point, take M1 = 3.0 and from Table read . Now, for the same value use
Table or Eq.(5.3a) to compute The value of M2 is exactly what we read in the shock Table, as the downstream Mach number when M1 = 3.0. The pressure ratio for these two states is
Prof. Dr. MOHSEN OSMAN 20
.1765.0....6540.0 *1
*1
PPand
TT
o
o ,6540.0*2 o
o
TT
8235.1....4752.0 *2
2 PPandM
,33.101765.08235.1)/()( *
1*2
1
2 PP
PP
PP
Which again is just what we read in Table, for M1=3. This illustration is meant only to show the physical background of the simple heating relations : it would be silly to make a practice of computing normal- shock wave in this manner.
Prof. Dr. MOHSEN OSMAN 21