THE ROLE OF THE TRANSLATOR: VISIBILITY, ETHICS AND SOCIOLOGY

Chapter 9

The cultural and political agenda of translation Venuti and the ‘invisibility’ of the

translatorInvisibility is used ‘to describe the

translator’s situation and activity in contemporary Anglo-American culture’.

Invisibility is produced by:1- the way translators themselves tend to

translate ‘fluently’ into English creating an ‘illusion of transparency’.

2- the way the translated texts are read in the target culture.

Domestication and foreignization

Two types of translating strategy • Domestication entails translating in

a transparent, fluent. ‘invisible’ style in order to minimize the foreignness of the TT. (leaves the reader in peace)

• Foreignization entails choosing a foreign text and developing a translation method along lines which are excluded by dominant cultural values in the TL. (leaves the writer in peace)

In his book The Scandals of Translation, Venuti continues to insist on foreignizing translation, to cultivate a varied and ‘heterogeneous discourse’.

Although he advocates foreignizing translation, he is also aware of its contradictions.

Antonio Berman: the ‘negative analytic’ of translation• Berman deplores the general tendency to negate the foreign

in translation by the translation strategy of ‘naturalization’.• He considers that there is generally a ‘system of textual

deformation’ in TTs that prevents the foreign coming through.• He identifies 12 deforming tendencies:1. Rationalization.2. Clarification.3. Expansion.4. Ennoblement.5. Qualitative impoverishment.6. Quantitative impoverishment.7. The destruction of rhythms.8. The destruction of underlying network of signification.9. The destruction of linguistic patternings.10. The destruction of vernacular networks or their

exoticization.11. The destruction of expressions and idioms.12. The effacement of the superimposition of languages.

The position and positionality of the literary translator The translators often consider that their work is

intuitive and that they must listen to their ‘ear’ Felstiner makes the important point that much of the

work that goes into producing a translation ‘becomes invisible once the new poem stands intact’.

Levine sees herself as a ‘translator-collaborator’ and as a ‘subversive scribe, ‘destroying’ the form of the original but reproducing the meaning in a new form.

Maria Tymoczko takes issue with those who see the translator as a neutral mediator in the act of translation.

Some translators have shown themselves to be more vociferous about the injustice of the publishing process.

The power network of the publishing industry

Publishers, as Venuti shows, are very reluctant to grant copyright or a share of the royalties to the translator .

Fawcett describes this complex network as amounting to a ‘power play’, with the final product considerably shaped by editors and copy-editors.

In some cases, the power play may result in the ST author being omitted from the translation process altogether.

Another key player in the process is the author’s literary agent.

Discussion of Venuti’s work Pym takes issue with Venuti’s figures Venuti’s general premises about

foreignizing and domesticating translation strategies, and about the invisibility of translator and the relative power of the publisher and the translator can be investigated in a variety of ways. P (154)

The reception and reviewing of translations Most English reviews prefer ‘fluent’

translations. Paratextual elements:- Peritexts- in the same location- Epitexts- not materially appended to

the text Reviews are either:Synchronic- all at the same timeDiachronic- over a longer time period

The sociology and historiography of translation What exactly causes a translator to

act in a given way in a given situation?

Why does one translator act differently from an other? (Munday, 2008)

Chesterman’s paper- translation practice