7-1© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. Corporate-Level Strategy Chapter Seven.
Chapter 9 Nelson & Quick Decision Making by Individuals & Groups Copyright ©2005 by South-Western,...
-
Upload
lorin-harmon -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
1
Transcript of Chapter 9 Nelson & Quick Decision Making by Individuals & Groups Copyright ©2005 by South-Western,...
![Page 1: Chapter 9 Nelson & Quick Decision Making by Individuals & Groups Copyright ©2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022032201/56649d145503460f949e8f85/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Chapter 9 Nelson & Quick
Decision Making by Decision Making by Individuals & GroupsIndividuals & Groups
Copyright ©2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.
![Page 2: Chapter 9 Nelson & Quick Decision Making by Individuals & Groups Copyright ©2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022032201/56649d145503460f949e8f85/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The Decision-Making Process
Programmed Decision - a simple, routine matter for which a manager has an established decision rule
Nonprogrammed Decision - a new, complex decision that requires a creative solution
![Page 3: Chapter 9 Nelson & Quick Decision Making by Individuals & Groups Copyright ©2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022032201/56649d145503460f949e8f85/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The Decision-Making Process
Recognize the problem andthe need for a decision
Identify the objective ofthe decision
Gather and evaluate dataand diagnose the situation
List and evaluatealternatives
![Page 4: Chapter 9 Nelson & Quick Decision Making by Individuals & Groups Copyright ©2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022032201/56649d145503460f949e8f85/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
The Decision-Making Process
Select the bestcourse of action
Implementthe decision
Gatherfeedback
Follow up
![Page 5: Chapter 9 Nelson & Quick Decision Making by Individuals & Groups Copyright ©2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022032201/56649d145503460f949e8f85/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Models of Decision Making
Effective Decision
a timely decision that meets a desired objective and is acceptable to those individuals affected by it
Garbage Can Model
Bounded Rationality Model
Rational Model
![Page 6: Chapter 9 Nelson & Quick Decision Making by Individuals & Groups Copyright ©2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022032201/56649d145503460f949e8f85/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
1. The outcome will be completely rational
2. The decision maker uses a consistent system of preferences to choose the best alternative
3. The decision maker is aware of all alternatives
4. The decision maker can calculate the probability of success for each alternative
Rationality - a logical, step-by-step approach to decision making, with a thorough analysis of alternatives and theirconsequences
Rational Model
![Page 7: Chapter 9 Nelson & Quick Decision Making by Individuals & Groups Copyright ©2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022032201/56649d145503460f949e8f85/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
1. Managers suggest the first satisfactory alternative
Bounded Rationality - a theory that suggests that there are limits upon how rational a decision maker can actually be
Bounded Rationality Model
Satisfice – to select the first alternative that is “goodenough,” because the costs in time and effort are toogreat to optimize
![Page 8: Chapter 9 Nelson & Quick Decision Making by Individuals & Groups Copyright ©2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022032201/56649d145503460f949e8f85/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
1. Managers suggest the first satisfactory alternative
2. Managers recognize that their conception of the world is simple
Bounded Rationality - a theory that suggests that there are limits upon how rational a decision maker can actually be
Bounded Rationality Model
3. Managers are comfortable making decisions without determining all the alternatives
4. Managers make decisions by rules of thumb or heuristics Heuristics – shortcuts in decision
making that save mental activity
![Page 9: Chapter 9 Nelson & Quick Decision Making by Individuals & Groups Copyright ©2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022032201/56649d145503460f949e8f85/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Garbage Can Model -
a theory that contends
that decisions in
organizations are
random and unsystematic
Problems
Solutions
Choiceopportunities
Participants
From M.D. Cohen, J.G. March, and J.P. Olsen in Administrative Science Quarterly 17 (March 1972) 1.25. Reprinted by permission of the Administrative Science Quarterly
Garbage Can Model
![Page 10: Chapter 9 Nelson & Quick Decision Making by Individuals & Groups Copyright ©2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022032201/56649d145503460f949e8f85/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Risk and the Manager
Risk Aversion - the tendency to choose options that entail fewer risks and less uncertainty
Risk takers accept greater potential for loss tolerate greater uncertainty more likely to make risky decisions
Evidence: Successful Managers Take Risks
![Page 11: Chapter 9 Nelson & Quick Decision Making by Individuals & Groups Copyright ©2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022032201/56649d145503460f949e8f85/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Escalation of Commitment
Why it occurs humans dislike inconsistency optimism control sunk costs
How to deal with it split responsibility for decisions provide individuals with a graceful exit have groups make the initial decision
The tendency to continue tocommit resources to a failingcourse of action
![Page 12: Chapter 9 Nelson & Quick Decision Making by Individuals & Groups Copyright ©2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022032201/56649d145503460f949e8f85/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Cognitive Style
Cognitive Style - an individual’s preference for gathering information and evaluating alternatives
Jungian theory offers a way of understanding and appreciating differences among individuals.
![Page 13: Chapter 9 Nelson & Quick Decision Making by Individuals & Groups Copyright ©2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022032201/56649d145503460f949e8f85/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Jung’s Cognitive Style
Style
Sensing/thinking
Sensing/feeling
Intuiting/thinking
Intuiting/feeling
Ideal Organization
Facts/ Impersonal Analysis
Facts & Org. Relationships
Broad Issues/Impersonal & Ideal
Serve Humankind/General Values
ST
SF
NT
NF
![Page 14: Chapter 9 Nelson & Quick Decision Making by Individuals & Groups Copyright ©2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022032201/56649d145503460f949e8f85/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Z Problem-Solving Model
Look at the facts
and details
Can it beanalyzed
objectively?
What alternativesdo the facts
suggest?
What impactwill it have on
those involved?
Sensing Intuition
Thinking Feeling
Figure from Type Talk at Work by Otto Kroeger and Janet M. Thuesen. Copyright © 1992 by Otto Kroegerand Janet M. Thuesen. Used by permission of Dell Publishing, a division of Random House. Inc.
![Page 15: Chapter 9 Nelson & Quick Decision Making by Individuals & Groups Copyright ©2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022032201/56649d145503460f949e8f85/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Two Brains, Two Cognitive Styles
Left Hemisphere Right Hemisphere
VerbalSequential, temporal,
digitalLogical, analytic
RationalWestern thought
Nonverbal, visuospatialSimultaneous, spatial,
analogicalGestalt, synthetic
IntuitiveEastern thought
Ideal = “brain-lateralized” making use ofeither or both sides, depending on situation
From Left Brain, Right Brain by Springer and Deutsch © 1989, 1985, 1981 by Sally Springer and Georg Deutsch. Used with permission by W.H. Freeman and Company
![Page 16: Chapter 9 Nelson & Quick Decision Making by Individuals & Groups Copyright ©2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022032201/56649d145503460f949e8f85/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Influences on Decision Making
Intuition - fast, positive force in decision making utilized at a level below consciousness, involves learned patterns of information
Creativity - a process influenced by individual and organizational factors that results in the production of novel and useful ideas, products, or both
![Page 17: Chapter 9 Nelson & Quick Decision Making by Individuals & Groups Copyright ©2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022032201/56649d145503460f949e8f85/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Four Stages of Creative Process
Verification
thinking,
sharing,
testing the
decision
Illumination
insight into
solving
a problem
Incubation
reflective,
often
unconscious
thought
Preparation experience/opportunity
to build knowledge
base
![Page 18: Chapter 9 Nelson & Quick Decision Making by Individuals & Groups Copyright ©2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022032201/56649d145503460f949e8f85/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Influences on Creativity
Individual examples Cognitive Processes
Divergent ThinkingAssociational AbilitiesUnconscious Processes
Personality Factorsbreadth of interestshigh energyself-confidence
Organizational examples Flexible organization
structure Participative decision
making Quality, supportive
relationships with supervisors
![Page 19: Chapter 9 Nelson & Quick Decision Making by Individuals & Groups Copyright ©2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022032201/56649d145503460f949e8f85/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Organizations Can Facilitate Creative Decision Making
Reward creativity Allow employees to fail Make work more fun Provide creativity training Vary work groups (internal/external) Encourage creative stimuli (music, art, etc.)
![Page 20: Chapter 9 Nelson & Quick Decision Making by Individuals & Groups Copyright ©2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022032201/56649d145503460f949e8f85/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Participative Decision Making
Organizational Foundations Participative, supportive organizational culture Team-oriented work design
Individual Prerequisites Capability to become psychologically involved in
participative activities Motivation to act autonomously Capacity to see the relevance of participation for one’s
own well-being
Individuals who are affectedby decisions influence themaking of those decisions
![Page 21: Chapter 9 Nelson & Quick Decision Making by Individuals & Groups Copyright ©2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022032201/56649d145503460f949e8f85/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Group Decision Making
Role of synergy - a positive force that occurs in groups when group members stimulate new solutions to problems through the process of mutual influence and encouragement in the group
Role of social decision schemes - simple rules used to determine final group decisions
(prediction 80% correct) Majority Wins
Truth Wins
Two-thirds Majority
First shift
![Page 22: Chapter 9 Nelson & Quick Decision Making by Individuals & Groups Copyright ©2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022032201/56649d145503460f949e8f85/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Group Decision Making
1) more knowledge through pooling of group resources2) Increased acceptance & commit- ment due to voice in decisions3) greater understanding due toinvolvement in decision stages
Advantages
1) pressure in groups to conform2) domination by one forceful member or dominant clique3) amount of time required, because group is slower than individual to make a decision
Disadvantages
![Page 23: Chapter 9 Nelson & Quick Decision Making by Individuals & Groups Copyright ©2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022032201/56649d145503460f949e8f85/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Group Phenomenon
Groupthink - a deterioration of mental efficiency, reality testing, and moral judgment resulting from in-group pressures
Group Polarization - the tendency for group discussion to produce shifts toward more extreme attitudes among members
![Page 24: Chapter 9 Nelson & Quick Decision Making by Individuals & Groups Copyright ©2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022032201/56649d145503460f949e8f85/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Preventing Groupthink
Ask each group member to act as critical evaluator Have the leader avoid stating his opinion prior to
the group decision Create several groups to work simultaneously Appoint a devil’s advocate Evaluate the competition carefully After consensus, encourage rethinking the position
From Janis, Irving L., Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes, Second Edition. Copyright © 1982 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
![Page 25: Chapter 9 Nelson & Quick Decision Making by Individuals & Groups Copyright ©2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022032201/56649d145503460f949e8f85/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Self-Managed Teams
DialecticalInquiry
Brainstorming
Devil’s Advocacy
Delphi Technique
Nominal Group Technique
Quality Circles & Quality Teams
GroupDecision
Techniques
![Page 26: Chapter 9 Nelson & Quick Decision Making by Individuals & Groups Copyright ©2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022032201/56649d145503460f949e8f85/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Technological Aids to Decision Making
Expert Systems - a programmed decision tool set up using decision rules
Decision Support Systems - computer and communication systems that process incoming data and synthesize pertinent information for managers to use
Group Decision Support Systems - systems that use computer software and communication facilities to support group decision-making processes in either face-to-face meetings or dispersed meetings
![Page 27: Chapter 9 Nelson & Quick Decision Making by Individuals & Groups Copyright ©2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022032201/56649d145503460f949e8f85/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Virtual Teams - groups of geographically dispersed coworkers who work together using a combination of telecommunications and information technologies to accomplish a task
Desktop Videoconferencing
Systems
Internet/IntranetSystems
Tools for
Virtual Teams
Group DecisionSupport Systems
![Page 28: Chapter 9 Nelson & Quick Decision Making by Individuals & Groups Copyright ©2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022032201/56649d145503460f949e8f85/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Ethics Check
Is it legal? Does it violate law Does it violate
company policy Is it balanced?
Is it fair to all Does it promote win–win relationships
How will it make me feel about myself