Chapter 9

35
Chapter 9 New Venture Valuate in Practice: The Investor’s Perspective Copyright¸ 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted in Section 117 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the express written permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. Request for further information should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Instructors may make copies of the PowerPoint Presentations contained herein for classroom distribution only. The Publisher assumes no responsibility for errors, omissions, or damages, caused by the use of these

description

 

Transcript of Chapter 9

Page 1: Chapter 9

Chapter 9

New Venture Valuate in Practice: The Investor’s

Perspective

Copyright¸ 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted in Section 117 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the express written permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. Request for further information should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Instructors may make copies of the PowerPoint Presentations contained herein for classroom distribution only. The Publisher assumes no responsibility for errors, omissions, or damages, caused by the use of these programs or from the use of the information contained herein.

Page 2: Chapter 9

Learning Objectives • How to use the CAPM to value an investment by either

the CEQ or RADR method.• How to use the First Chicago Method and the Venture

Capital Method of valuation.• Recognize the strengths and weaknesses of each

valuation approach.• Estimate project betas and required rates of return by

alternative methods.• Estimate correlation between project returns and market

returns, risk-free rate, and standard deviation of market returns.

• How to use multipliers to estimate the continuing value of a new venture.

• Recognize and use opportunities to take advantage of valuation short-cuts.

©2003, Entrepreneurial Finance, Smith and Kiholm Smith Chapter 9

Page 3: Chapter 9

Common Valuation Approaches

• Asset-based approaches– Book Value– Adjusted Book Value– Replacement Cost– Liquidation Value

• Market comparisons– Secondary-market financial claims on comparables– Primary-market transactions on comparables– Acquisition transactions

• Revenue, Earnings, and Cash Flow-based approaches– Capitalization of Revenues– Capitalization of Earnings– Discounted Cash Flow (VC Method, First Chicago

Method, Other)• The objective is always to value future cash flows

©2003, Entrepreneurial Finance, Smith and Kiholm Smith Chapter 9

Page 4: Chapter 9

Criteria for Selecting a New Venture Valuation Method

• Discounted cash flow methods often are the only feasible approaches.

• Is the method based on expected cash flows?• Is cost of capital used as the discount rate?• How important is dealing with cash flows that vary in

risk?• How important are embedded options and complex

financial claims?• How difficult is the method to use?• What are the information requirements?

©2003, Entrepreneurial Finance, Smith and Kiholm Smith Chapter 9

Page 5: Chapter 9

Using Continuing Value to Estimate the Worth of a New Venture

©2003, Entrepreneurial Finance, Smith and Kiholm Smith Chapter 9

Figure 9-1

Page 6: Chapter 9

Using Continuing Value Instead of Explicit Cash Flow Projections

1) Identify the “Explicit Value Period” and the “Continuing Value Period”.

2) Estimate cash flows in the explicit value period.

3) Decide which multiplier (sales, earnings, etc.) to use for continuing value.

4) Forecast the multiple at the end of the explicit value period, using an appropriate method and data.

5) Estimate continuing value using the multiple.

©2003, Entrepreneurial Finance, Smith and Kiholm Smith Chapter 9

Page 7: Chapter 9

Price Earnings Ratio of S&P 500 Index 1995-1997Figure 9-2

©2003, Entrepreneurial Finance, Smith and Kiholm Smith Chapter 9

Page 8: Chapter 9

Discounted Cash Flow Methods of New Venture Valuation

• The Venture Capital Method• The First Chicago Method• The RADR Method

– Based on the CAPM• The CEQ Method

– Based on the CAPM

©2003, Entrepreneurial Finance, Smith and Kiholm Smith Chapter 1

Page 9: Chapter 9

The RADR Discount Rate• Opportunity Cost of Capital

• All measures are based on holding period returns

©2003, Entrepreneurial Finance, Smith and Kiholm Smith Chapter 9

Page 10: Chapter 9

Implementing Valuation by the RADR Form of the CAPM

• Information requirements:– Expected cash flows– Risk-free rate– Market risk premium– Beta (standard deviations of asset and market

returns, correlation)• Estimating expected cash flows

©2003, Entrepreneurial Finance, Smith and Kiholm Smith Chapter 9

Page 11: Chapter 9

Implementing Valuation by the RADR Form of the CAPM

• Estimating the risk-free rate• Estimating the market risk premium• Estimating beta

– Comparable firms– Public venture funds– Scenarios

• Implicit estimates of cost of capital

©2003, Entrepreneurial Finance, Smith and Kiholm Smith Chapter 9

Page 12: Chapter 9

SIC Grouping by Two-digit SIC Range and Equity Beta Range

©2003, Entrepreneurial Finance, Smith and Kiholm Smith Chapter 9

Figure 9-3

Page 13: Chapter 9

Beta Estimates (S&P 500)

©2003, Entrepreneurial Finance, Smith and Kiholm Smith Chapter 9

Figure 9-4 Number

of Obs. Mean Beta

All Observations 2623 0.993 Industry Biotechnology 501 0.747 Broadcast and Cable TV 105 0.804 Communication Equipment 247 1.157 Communication Services 407 1.019 Computer Networks 130 1.023 Computer Services 440 0.811 Catalog/Mail Order (Internet) 39 1.240 Software 754 1.202 Age (Years After IPO) 0-1 years 1263 0.930 2-3 years 957 0.958 >3 years 403 1.270 Financial Condition No Revenue 102 0.824 Revenue, Negative Income 1475 1.139 Positive Income 1033 0.821 Employees 0 – 25 187 0.586 26 – 100 496 0.861 Over 100 1661 1.138

Page 14: Chapter 9

Standard Deviation of the Market Return (S&P 500)

©2003, Entrepreneurial Finance, Smith and Kiholm Smith Chapter 9

Page 15: Chapter 9

Correlation Coefficients (S&P 500)Figure 9-6

©2003, Entrepreneurial Finance, Smith and Kiholm Smith Chapter 9

Number of Obs.

Mean

All Observations 2623 0.195 Industry Biotechnology 501 0.149 Broadcast and Cable TV 105 0.237 Communication Equipment 247 0.215 Communication Services 407 0.241 Computer Networks 130 0.208 Computer Services 440 0.172 Catalog/Mail Order (Internet) 39 0.217 Software 754 0.200 Age (Years After IPO) 0-1 years 1263 0.162 2-3 years 957 0.212 >3 years 403 0.259 Financial Condition No Revenue 102 0.165 Revenue, Negative Income 1475 0.197 Positive Income 1033 0.200 Employees 0 – 25 187 0.117 26 – 100 496 0.153 Over 100 1661 0.231

Page 16: Chapter 9

The CEQ Form of the CAPM

• CAPM

©2003, Entrepreneurial Finance, Smith and Kiholm Smith Chapter 9

Page 17: Chapter 9

Implementing Valuation by the CEQ Form of the CAPM

• Information requirements:– Expected cash flows– Standard deviation of asset cash flows– Standard deviation of market– Correlation of cash flows with market– Risk-free rate

• Estimating the CEQ Model– Scenario analysis as a way to estimate cash flow beta– Standard deviation of market returns– Correlation between project cash flows and market

• Reality check• Caveat for valuing high-risk cash flows

©2003, Entrepreneurial Finance, Smith and Kiholm Smith Chapter 9

Page 18: Chapter 9

Illustration

©2003, Entrepreneurial Finance, Smith and Kiholm Smith Chapter 9

Page 19: Chapter 9

©2003, Entrepreneurial Finance, Smith and Kiholm Smith Chapter 9

Figure 9-7

Page 20: Chapter 9

©2003, Entrepreneurial Finance, Smith and Kiholm Smith Chapter 9

Figure 9-8

Page 21: Chapter 9

©2003, Entrepreneurial Finance, Smith and Kiholm Smith Chapter 9

Figure 9-9

Page 22: Chapter 9

End of Chapter Questions

©2003, Entrepreneurial Finance, Smith and Kiholm Smith Chapter 1

Page 23: Chapter 9

Question 9-1

The following table contains seven years of financial projections for a new venture that is seeking capital to finance the commencement of operations.

All dollar figures are in thousands. All cash flow during this period is expected to be reinvested in the venture and is reflected in the table.

– Assuming the projections represent expected values including any expected new investments, and given only this information, considering growth rate trends and stability, how would you suggest valuing the venture? How would you estimate continuing value and reflect it in your valuation? Explain your reasoning.

Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Revenue $0 $850 $2,300 $6,100 $10,700 $13,100 $13,800

EBIT -$2,000 -$788 -$1925 -$975 -$325 $275 $450

Assets $3,000 $1,000 $4,500 $3,525 $6,200 $6,475 $8,925

©2003, Entrepreneurial Finance, Smith and Kiholm Smith Chapter 9

Page 24: Chapter 9

Question 9-2

You are considering investing in a venture. Five years from now, assuming the venture is successful, it is projected to have revenue of $52 million, EBIT of $2 million, and assets of $35 million. Three-year compound annual growth of sales as of year 5 is expected to be 20 percent. The venture does not anticipate paying dividends during this period.

As a basis for estimating continuing value, you have compiled information on five public companies that are in the same or closely related industries. (Dollar figures are in millions).

• Analyze the information and use it to estimate the continuing value of the venture. Explain your reasoning

©2003, Entrepreneurial Finance, Smith and Kiholm Smith Chapter 9

Page 25: Chapter 9

Question 9-3

Edu-tainment, Inc. is a provider of courses that are delivered over the Internet. The entrepreneur believes that by making Internet education entertaining he can attract and retain a large share of the adult education market.

The following table contains the entrepreneur’s financial projections for the venture. Figures are in thousands of dollars

©2003, Entrepreneurial Finance, Smith and Kiholm Smith Chapter 9

Page 26: Chapter 9

Question 9-3 (Cont’d)

He is seeking to raise $6 million of venture capital (in the form of an equity investment) to initiate the program, contract with content providers, and begin marketing. Successful ventures that are similar have recently gone public at valuations around 12 times trailing net income.

• Assume you like the concept and are impressed by the entrepreneur. Estimate how much of the equity of the venture you would need to justify your investment.

• Assume that cash generated by the venture during the forecast period will be retained to finance growth. (Hint:You may want to refer back to Chapter 8 for information on the sought-for returns of venture capital investors).

©2003, Entrepreneurial Finance, Smith and Kiholm Smith Chapter 9

Page 27: Chapter 9

Question 9-4

Suppose you believe that the venture described in problem 3 can be valued by the CAPM, using data on several public companies that you regard as comparable in terms of market risk, along with some other market information. The following table contains information on the comparable firms.

• Assuming the comparable firm debt has a beta of zero use the information to estimate the beta of the venture.

©2003, Entrepreneurial Finance, Smith and Kiholm Smith Chapter 9

Page 28: Chapter 9

Question 9-4 (Continued)In addition, you have the following information on interest rates on

U.S.government debt and stock market returns.• The current one-year interest rate is 7.5 percent.• The long-run historical average one-year rate is 6.5 percent.• The current five-year interest rate is 4.0 percent.• The long-run historical average five-year rate is 4.2 percent.• On average, the S&P 500 has earned returns 8 percent above one-

year U.S. government debt and 7.5 percent above five-year debt.• The average historical P/E ratio of the S&P 500 is about 14.• During the last five years, the S&P 500 has earned compound

annual returns of about 20 percent, whereas one-year interest rates on government debt have averaged 5.5 percent.

• The current P/E ratio of the S&P 500 is about 21.• The historical standard deviation of market returns is 14 percent.

– Using the above information, what is your estimate of the required return on assets for the venture? Explain your reasoning.

©2003, Entrepreneurial Finance, Smith and Kiholm Smith Chapter 9

Page 29: Chapter 9

Question 9-5

For the venture in problem 3, you develop an expected scenario and a failure scenario to go along with the entrepreneur’s success scenario.

In the success scenario, the venture is harvested in year 5. You expect to receive no cash flow before harvest.

In the expected scenario, the venture has net income of $20 million in year 5, and the expected multiple is 12 times earnings.

In the failure scenario, you expect to liquidate in year 5, in which case, your preferred stock would be worth about $1.5 million.

You believe that the probabilities of results close to success and failure are each 0.25 and that the probability of results close to the expected scenario is 0.5.

• Using the cost of capital you estimated in problem 4, find the present value of the venture, and determine the fraction of equity you would require (at a minimum) for investing the $6 million.

©2003, Entrepreneurial Finance, Smith and Kiholm Smith Chapter 9

Page 30: Chapter 9

Question 9-6

You are comfortable with the multipliers and probabilities as stated in problem 5, but uncomfortable with using the comparable firm information to value the project as of today.

In other words, the beta estimate may be fine for trying to value the venture as of year 5, but may not a good measure of beta risk during the venture’s e early years.

Instead of using the beta estimate, you would like to base your valuation on the assumption that the correlation between success of the venture and the overall market is in the range of 0.1 to 0.2. (Your best estimate of the correlation is 0.15.)

• Using this information, and information from the earlier questions, what range of values would you place on the venture, and what is your best estimate of the value?

• How much of the equity would you require for investing.

©2003, Entrepreneurial Finance, Smith and Kiholm Smith Chapter 9

Page 31: Chapter 9

Question 9-7

You are considering investing $750,000 in a venture. According to the business plan, the venture will need an additional $1.0 million next year (year one) to acquire its initial inventory.

According to the plan, the venture will generate no free cash flow in years two and three, $200,000 in year four, $600,000 in year five, and $1.4 million in year six.

Suppose you believe there is a 30 percent probability that the venture will fail before the second investment is needed. You also believe that the probability of failing before year four is 50 percent, the probability of failing before year five is 60 percent, and the probability of failing before year six is 70 percent.

If the venture fails, free cash flow in each year after the failure will be zero. If the venture survives to year five, you expect that free cash flow will grow at a rate of 6 percent per year.

Because the year-one investment has no beta risk, you believe it should be valued at the risk-free rate of 4 percent.

©2003, Entrepreneurial Finance, Smith and Kiholm Smith Chapter 9

Page 32: Chapter 9

Question 9-7 (Continued)

Based on comparisons to other firms, you believe the appropriate rate for valuing cash flows in other years is 11 percent.

You wish to determine the fraction of equity that would be sufficient to justify making the first investment assuming that you would receive no additional equity in exchange for making the year-one investment.

a) Identify the explicit value period, determine the expected cash flows during that period, and their present value.

b) Determine the multiplier that you should use to determine continuing value and use the multiplier to find continuing value.

c) Compute the total present value of the venture and determine the minimum fraction of equity you would need to justify making the initial investment.

©2003, Entrepreneurial Finance, Smith and Kiholm Smith Chapter 9

Page 33: Chapter 9

Question 9-8The following table shows average annual returns to venture

capital funds as estimated by Venture Economics and the National Venture Capital Association.

a) Find the arithmetic mean annual return for this seriesb) Find the geometric mean annual returnc) Which do you think would be better for forecasting future

performance of a fund over eight years? Why?d) Test your answer in part (c) by setting up a simulation

model where the arithmetic mean return and its standard deviation are used to produce seven independent draws from a normal distribution. Use the model to generate a large sample of cumulative eight-year returns. Is the average from the eight years better explained by geometric compounding of the annual average or by an arithmetic average?

©2003, Entrepreneurial Finance, Smith and Kiholm Smith Chapter 9

Page 34: Chapter 9

Question 9-9

The following scenario information describes the harvest cash flows per acre for a new venture that would invest in a plantation forest on public land with the expectation that the trees can be logged and sold for lumber and paper production in 20 years. Compound annual returns for the different scenarios are based on an estimate that the costs of planting and maintaining the forest will be $10,000 per acre.

©2003, Entrepreneurial Finance, Smith and Kiholm Smith Chapter 9

Page 35: Chapter 9

Question 9-9 (Cont’d)

a) Use the returns information for the different scenarios to estimate the project beta based on the present value of the expected actual investment amount.

b) Use the cash flow information for the different scenarios to estimate the project cash flow beta.

c) Assuming that the long-term risk-free rate is 5.5 percent and the market risk premium is 6 percent, estimate the RADR cost of capital based on part (a) and estimate the present value per acre. Does it appear that you should make the investment?

d) Using the above market information and the cash flow beta, find the CEQ present value. Should you make the investment?

e) Use the results from part (d) to determine the cost of capital implied by the CEQ analysis. Why is the CEQ cost for capital different from cost of capital estimated by the RADR method?

©2003, Entrepreneurial Finance, Smith and Kiholm Smith Chapter 9