Chapter 8 Similitude and Dimensional Analysis
Transcript of Chapter 8 Similitude and Dimensional Analysis
Ch. 8 Similitude and Dimensional Analysis
8-1
Chapter 8 Similitude and Dimensional Analysis
8.0 Introduction
8.1 Similitude and Physical Models
8.2 Dimensional Analysis
8.3 Normalization of Equations
Objectives:
- learn how to begin to interpret fluid flows
- introduce concept of model study for the analysis of the flow phenomena that could not be
solved by analytical (theoretical) methods
- introduce laws of similitude which provide a basis for interpretation of model results
- study dimensional analysis to derive equations expressing a physical relationship between
quantities
Ch. 8 Similitude and Dimensional Analysis
8-2
8.0 Introduction
Why we need to model the real system?
Most real fluid flows are complex and can be solved only approximately by analytical
methods.
Real System
Conceptual Model Simplified version of real system
Field Study Physical Modeling Mathematical Model
(Scaled and simplified [Governing equations
version of prototype) + Boundary (initial) conditions]
Analytical solution Numerical solution (model)
(FDM/FEM/FVM)
Set of assumptions
Ch. 8 Similitude and Dimensional Analysis
8-3
▪ Three dilemmas in planning a set of physical experiments or numerical experiments
1) Number of possible and relevant variables or physical parameters in real system is huge and
so the potential number of experiments is beyond our resources.
2) Many real flow situations are either too large or far too small for convenient experiment at
their true size.
→ When testing the real thing (prototype) is not feasible, a physical model (scaled version of
the prototype) can be constructed and the performance of the prototype simulated in the
physical model.
3) The solutions produced by numerical simulations must be verified or numerical models
calibrated by use of physical models or measurements in the prototype.
▪ Model study
Physical models have been used for over a hundred years.
Models began to be used to study flow phenomena that could not be solved by analytical
(theoretical) methods.
[Ex]
Civil and environmental engineering: models of hydraulic structures,
river sections, estuaries and coastal bays and seas
Mechanical engineering: models of pumps and turbine,
automobiles
Naval architect: ship models
Aeronautical engineering: model test in wind tunnels
Ch. 8 Similitude and Dimensional Analysis
8-4
▪ Justification for models
1) Economics: A model, being small compared to the prototype, costs little.
2) Practicability: In a model, environmental and flow conditions can be rigorously
controlled.
▪ Laws of similitude
- provide a basis for interpretation of physical and numerical model results and crafting both
physical and numerical experiments
▪ Dimensional analysis
- derive equations expressing a physical relationship between quantities
Ch. 8 Similitude and Dimensional Analysis
8-5
8.1 Similitude and Physical Models
Similitude of flow phenomena not only occurs between a prototype and it modelbut also may
exist between various natural phenomena.
There are three basic types of similitude; all three must be obtained if complete similarity is
to exist between fluid phenomena.
Geometrical similarity
Kinematic similarity
Dynamic similarity
1) Geometrical similarity
Ch. 8 Similitude and Dimensional Analysis
8-6
~ Flow field and boundary geometry of model and of the prototype have the same shape.
→ The ratios between corresponding lengths in model and prototype are the same.
[Cf] Distorted model
~ not geometrically similar ( )r rl d
~ The flows are not similar and the models have to be calibrated and adjusted to make them
perform properly.
~ used models of rivers, harbor, estuary
~ Numerical models are usually used in their place.
For the characteristic lengths we have
p p
r rm m
d ld l
d l
• Area
2 2
p p p
m m m
A d l
A d l
• Volume
3 3
p p p
m m m
Vol d l
Vol d l
2) Kinematic similarity
Ch. 8 Similitude and Dimensional Analysis
8-7
In addition to the flowfields having the same shape, the ratios of corresponding velocities and
accelerations must be the same through the flow.
→ Flows with geometrically similar streamlines are kinematically similar.
1 2
1 2
p p
m m
V V
V V
3 4
3 4
p p
m m
a a
a a
3) Dynamic similarity
In order to maintain the geometric and kinematic similarity between flowfields, the forces
acting on corresponding fluid masses must be related by ratios similar to those for kinematic
similarity.
Consider gravity, viscous and pressure forces, and apply Newton’s 2nd law
1 2 3 4
1 2 3 4
p p p p p
m m m m m
F F F M a
F F F M a
(8.2)
Define inertia force as the product of the mass and the acceleration
IF M a
4) Complete similarity
~ requires simultaneous satisfaction of geometric, kinematic, and dynamic similarity.
Ch. 8 Similitude and Dimensional Analysis
8-8
→ Kinematically similar flows must be geometrically similar.
→ If the mass distributions in flows are similar, then kinematic similarity (density ratio for
the corresponding fluid mass are the same) guarantees complete similarity from Eq. (8.2).
From Fig. 8.1, it is apparent that
1 2 3 4p p p p pF F F M a
(a)
1 2 3 4m m m m mF F F M a
(b)
If the ratios between three of the four corresponding terms in Eq.(a) and Eq.(b) are the same,
the ratio between the corresponding fourth terms be the same as that the other three. Thus,
one of the ratio of Eq.(8.2) is redundant. If the first force ratio is eliminated,
4 4
2 2
p p m m
p m
M a M a
F F
(8.3)
4 4
3 3
p p m m
p m
M a M a
F F
(8.4)
▪ The scalar magnitude of forces affecting a flow field
Pressure force: 2pF p A pl
Inertia force: 2
3 2 2I
VF M a l V l
l
Gravity force: 3
GF M g l g
Ch. 8 Similitude and Dimensional Analysis
8-9
Viscosity force: 2
V
dv VF A l V l
dy l
Elasticity force: 2EF EA E l
Surface tension: TF l
Here l and V are characteristic length and velocity for the system.
[Re] Other forces
Coriolis force of rotating system → Rossby number
Buoyant forces in stratified flow → Richardson number
Forces in an oscillating flow → Strouhal number
▪ Dynamic similarity
To obtain dynamic similarity between two flowfields when all these forces act, all
corresponding force ratios must be the same in model and prototype.
Ch. 8 Similitude and Dimensional Analysis
8-10
(i) 2 2
I I
p p p mp m
F F V V
F F p p
(8.5)
Define Euler number, 2
Eu Vp
p mEu Eu
(ii) I I
V V p mp m
F F V l V l
F F
(8.6)
Define Reynolds number, V l
Re
p mRe Re → Reynolds law
(iii) 2 2
I I
G G p mp m
F F V V
F F g l g l
(8.7)
Define Froude number, V
Frg l
p mFr Fr → Froude law
(iv) 2 2
I I
E E p mp m
F F V V
F F E E
(8.8)
Define Cauchy number, 2V
CaE
Ch. 8 Similitude and Dimensional Analysis
8-11
p mCa Ca
[Cf] Define Mach number, V
Ma CaE
p mMa Ma
(v) 2 2
I I
T T p mp m
F F lV lV
F F
(8.9)
Define Weber number, 2lV
We
p mWe We
Only four of these equations are independent. → One equation is redundant according to the
argument leading to Eq. (8.3) & (8.4). → If four equations are simultaneously satisfied, then
dynamic similarity will be ensured and fifth equation will be satisfied.
In most engineering problems (real world), some of the forces above (1) may not act, (2) may
be of negligible magnitude, or (3) may oppose other forces in such a way that the effect of
both is reduced.
→ In the problem of similitude a good understanding of fluid phenomena is necessary to
determine how the problem may be simplified by the elimination of the irrelevant, negligible,
or compensating forces.
Ch. 8 Similitude and Dimensional Analysis
8-12
1. Reynolds similarity
~ Flows in pipe, viscosity-dominant flow
For low-speed submerged body problem, there are no surface tension phenomena, negligible
compressibility effects, and gravity does not affect the flowfield.
→ Three of four equations are not relevant to the problem.
→ Dynamic similarity is obtained between model and prototype when the Reynolds numbers
(ratio of inertia to viscous forces) are the same.
p mp m
V l V lRe Re
(8.6)
[Re] Reynolds similarity
Ratio of any corresponding forces will be the same.
Consider Drag force, 2 2D C V l
I Ip m
D D
F F
2 2 2 2
p m
D D
V l V l
Ch. 8 Similitude and Dimensional Analysis
8-13
For flow of incompressible fluids through closed passages
Geometric similarity:
2 1 2 1p md d d d
1 1p m
l l
d d
Assume roughness pattern is similar, surface tension and elastic effect are nonexistent.
Gravity does not affect the flow fields
Accordingly dynamic similarity results when Reynolds similarity, Eq. (8.6) is satisfied.
p mRe Re
Eq. (8.5) is satisfied automatically.
1 2 1 2
2 2I I
P P p mp m
F F p p p p
F F V V
(8.5)
Ch. 8 Similitude and Dimensional Analysis
8-14
◈ Reynolds similarity
① Velocity:
p mRe Re 1 , 1pr
m
ReRe
Re
1 pm m m
mp m p p p m
p
dVVd VddV dd
1
If m mm p
p p
V d
V d
② Discharge: Q VA
2 2
1m m m m m m m
mp p p p p p p
p
Q d V d ddQ d V d dd
③ Time:
2
1 1m
pm m m m m m
p m mp p p p m p
p pp
l
T V l l d ll VT l l d l
VV
④ Force:
22 3 2
2 3 2
m m m m m m m pm m
p p mp p p p p p p
m l T l l TF
F m l T l l T
⑤ Pressure:
2 2
m p pm
p m mp
lP
lP
Ch. 8 Similitude and Dimensional Analysis
8-15
[IP 8.1] Water flows in a 75 mm horizontal pipeline at a mean velocity of 3 m/s.
Prototype: Water 0 C 31.781 10 Pa sp
399.8 kg/mp
3
6 21.781 101.78 10 m /s
998.8pv
75mm, 3m/s, 14 kPa, 10 mp p pd V p l
Model: Gasoline 20 C 42.9 10 Pa sm (Table A 2.1)
30.68 998.8 679.2 kg/mm
7 24.27 10 m /smv
25mmmd
[Sol] Use Reynolds similarity; Re Rep m
1
m m m
p p p
V v d
V v d
7
6
4.27 10 25/ 0.753
1.78 10 75
0.753(3) 2.26m/smV
p mEu Eu
2 2
p m
p p
eV eV
2 2
14
[998.8 (3) ] [679.2 (2.26) ]mp
5.4 kPamp
Ch. 8 Similitude and Dimensional Analysis
8-16
2. Froude similarity
~ Open channel flow, free surface flow, gravity-dominant flow.
For flow field about an object moving on the surface of a liquid such as ship model (William
Froude, 1870)
~ Compressibility and surface tension may be ignored.
~ Frictional effects are assumed to be ignored.
p m
p m
V VFr Fr
g l g l
(8.7)
m m m
p p p
V g l
V g l
Ch. 8 Similitude and Dimensional Analysis
8-17
[Re] Combined action of gravity and viscosity
For ship hulls, the contribution of wave pattern and frictional action to the drag are the same
order.
→ Frictional effects cannot be ignored.
→ This problem requires both Froude similarity and Reynolds similarity.
m m mp m
p p pp m
v v V g lFr Fr
g l g l V g l
(a)
pm m
p mp m p p m
lVV l V lR e R e
V l
(b)
Combine (a) and (b)
pm m m
p p p m
lg l
g l l
→
0.5 1.5
m mm
p pp
g l
g l
This requires
(a) A liquid of appropriate viscosity must be found for the model test.
(b) If same liquid is used, then model is as large as prototype.
For m pg g
1.5 1.5
m mmm p
ppp
l lll
If 1
10 31.6m
mp
l
l
Water: 31.0 10 Pa s
Ch. 8 Similitude and Dimensional Analysis
8-18
Hydrogen: 40.21 10 Pa s
~ Choose only one equation → Reynolds or Froude
~ Correction (correcting for scale effect) is necessary.
Ch. 8 Similitude and Dimensional Analysis
8-19
◈ Froude law
① Velocity
m m m
p p p
V g l
V g l
② Time l
Tv
p p p pm m m m
p p m p m m m p
V g l gT l l l
T l V l g l g l
③ Discharge Q vA
2 2 0.5 2.5
m m m mm m m m
p p p pp p p p
l l g lQ V g ll l g lQ V g l
④ Force
3
m mm
p pp
lFlF
⑤ Pressure
m mm
p pp
lPlP
Ch. 8 Similitude and Dimensional Analysis
8-20
[IP 8.2] Ship model (Free surface flow)
120 mpl , 3 mml , 56 km hpV
9 NmD
Find model velocity and prototype drag.
[Sol]
Use Froude similarity
p m
V V
g l g l
(8.7)
3 1
120 40m
rp
ll
l
1 2356 10 32.46 m s
3600 120m
m p
p
g lV V
g l
• Drag force ratio
2 2 2 2
p m
D D
V l V l
(8.15)
2 2 2 23
2 2
12056 10 36009 575.8 kN32.46
pp m
m
V lD D
V l
Ch. 8 Similitude and Dimensional Analysis
8-21
3. Mach similarity
Similitude in compressible fluid flow
~ gas, air
~ Gravity and surface tension are ignored.
~ Combined action of resistance and elasticity (compressibility)
p p m
p mm m p
V lR e R e
V l
(a)
p m
p m
V VMa Ma
a a
(8.8)
sonic velocityE
where a
p p
m m
V a
V a (b)
Combine (a) and (b)
p mp
pmm
al
al
→ gases of appropriate viscosity are available for the model test.
Ch. 8 Similitude and Dimensional Analysis
8-22
• Velocity
pm m m
p p p m
V a E
V a E
• Time
p pm m m m
p p m m p p
V ET l l
T l V E l
• Discharge
2 2
m mp pm m
p pp m m p
l lV EQl lQ V E
Ch. 8 Similitude and Dimensional Analysis
8-23
4. Euler Similarity
~ Modeling of prototype cavitation
~ For cavitation problem, vapor pressure must be included.
[Ex.1] Cavitating hydrofoil model in a water tunnel
Fig. 8.6 (a)
Here gravity, compressibility, and surface tension are neglected.
Dynamic similitude needs Reynolds similarity and Euler similarity.
p mp m
V l V lRe Re
0 0
2 20 0
v vp m
p m
p p p p
V V
(8.5)
02
vp p
V
= cavitation number
0p = absolute pressure
vp = vapor pressure
~ Virtually impossible to satisfy both equation.
~ Cavitation number must be the same in model and prototype.
Ch. 8 Similitude and Dimensional Analysis
8-24
[I.P.8.3] Model of hydraulic overflow structure → spillway model
3600 m spQ
1
15m
rp
ll
l
[Sol]
Since gravity is dominant, use Froude similarity.
0.5 2.5
m mm
p pp
g lQg lQ
2.5 2.51
60015
mm p
p
lQ Q
l
30.69 m s 690 l/s
Ch. 8 Similitude and Dimensional Analysis
8-25
8.2 Dimensional Analysis
Dimensional analysis
~ mathematics of the dimensions of quantities
~ is closely related to laws of similitude
~ based on Fourier′s principle of dimensional homogeneity (1882)
→ An equation expressing a physical relationship between quantities must be dimensionally
homogeneous.
→ The dimensions of each side of equation must be the same.
~ cannot produce analytical solutions to physical problems.
~ powerful tool in formulating problems which defy analytical solution and must be solved
experimentally.
~ It points the way toward a maximum of information from a minimum of experiment by
the formation of dimensionless groups, some of which are identical with the force ratios
developed with the laws of similitude.
▪ Four basic dimension
~ directly relevant to fluid mechanics
~ independent fundamental dimensions
length, L
mass, M or force, F
time, t
thermodynamic temperature T
Ch. 8 Similitude and Dimensional Analysis
8-26
Newton′s 2nd law
2
M LF M a
t
~ There are only independent fundamental dimensions.
(1) Rayleigh method
Suppose that power, P , derived from hydraulic turbine is dependent on , , TQ E
Suppose that the relation between these four variables is unknown but it is known that these
are the only variables involved in the problem.
, , TP f Q E
(a)
Q = flow rate
= specific weight of the fluid
TE = unit mechanical energy by unit weight of fluid (Fluid system → turbine)
Principle of dimensional homogeneity
→ Quantities involved cannot be added or subtracted since their dimensions are different.
Eq. (a) should be a combination of products of power of the quantities.
a b cTP C Q E
(b)
where C = dimensionless constant ~ cannot be obtained by dimensional methods
, ,a b c = unknown exponents
Ch. 8 Similitude and Dimensional Analysis
8-27
Eq. (b) can be written dimensionally as
Dimensions ofDimensions of Dimensions of Dimensions ofca b
TEP Q
2 3
3 2 2
a bcML ML
Lt L tt
(c)
Using the principle of dimensional homogeneity, the exponent of each of the fundamental
dimensions is the same on each side of the equation.
: 1M b
: 2 3 2L a b c
: 3 2t a b
Solving for a, b, and c yields
1, 1, 1a b c
Resubstituting these values Eq. (b) gives
TP C Q E
(d)
C dimensionless constant that can be obtained from
① a physical analysis of the problem
② an experimental measurement of , , , TP Q E
Rayleigh method ~ early development of a dimensional analysis
Ch. 8 Similitude and Dimensional Analysis
8-28
(2) Buckingham theorem
~ generalized method to find useful dimensionless groups of variables to describe process (E.
Buckingham, 1915)
▪ Buckingham′s - theorem
1. n variables are functions of each other
→ Then k equations of their exponents , , ,a b c can be written.
k = largest number of variables among n variables which cannot be combined into a
dimensionless group
[Ex]
Drag force ~ , , , ,D f l V g on ship
2. In most cases, k is equal to the number m of independent dimensions (M, L, t)
k m
3. Application of dimensional analysis allows expression of the functional relationship in
terms of n k distinct dimensionless groups.
[Ex] 6, 3 3 groupsn k m n k
1 2 2
D
l V
2 e
VlR
3 r
VF
gl
Ch. 8 Similitude and Dimensional Analysis
8-29
[Ex] Drag on a ship
, , , , , 0f D l V g
Three basic variables = repeating variables
, ,
, ,
V l
t L M
Other variables , ,D g appear only in the unique group describing the ratio of inertia force
to force related to the variable.
• Procedure:
1. Find the largest number of variables which do not form a dimensionless - group.
For drag problem, No. of independent dimensions is 3 and , andm V l cannot be
formed into a - group, so 3k m
2. Determine the number of - groups to be formed: 6, 3n k m
∴ No. of - group = 3n k
3. Combine sequentially the variables that cannot be formed into a dimensionless group, with
each of the remaining variables to form the requisite - groups.
1 1 , , ,f D V l
2 2 , , ,f V l
3 3 , , ,f g V l
Ch. 8 Similitude and Dimensional Analysis
8-30
4. Determine the detailed form of the dimensionless groups using principle of
dimensional homogeneity.
i) 1
1a b c dD V l
(a)
Since 1 is dimensionless, writing Eq. (a) dimensionally
0 0 02 3
a b cdML M L
M L t Lt L t
(b)
The following equations in the exponents of the dimensions are obtained
: 0M a b
: 0 3L a b c d
: 0 2t a c
Solving these equations in terms of a gives
, 2 , 2b a c a d a
2 2
1 2 2
a
a a a a DD V l
l V
The exponent may be taken as any convenient number other than zero.
If a = 1, then
1 2 2
D
l V
(c)
Ch. 8 Similitude and Dimensional Analysis
8-31
ii) 2
2a b c dV l
0 0 03
a b cdM M L
M L t LLt L t
: 0M a b
: 0 3L a b c d
: 0t a c
Solving these equations in terms of a gives
, ,b a c a d a
2
a
a a a aV llV
If a = -1, then
2 ReV l
(d)
iii) 3
3a b c dg l V
0 0 0
2 3
a c dbL M L
M L t Lt L t
Ch. 8 Similitude and Dimensional Analysis
8-32
: 0M c
: 0 3L a b c d
: 0 2t a d
Solving these equations in terms of a gives
, 0, 2b a c d a
23 2
aa a a g l
g l VV
(e)
If a = -1/2, then
3 FrV
g l
Combining these three equations gives
2 2, Re, Fr 0
Df
l V
2 2Re, Fr
Df
l V
Dimensional analysis
~ no clue to the functional relationship among 2 2 , Re and FrD l V
~ arrange the numerous original variables into a relation between a smaller number of
dimensionless groups of variables.
~ indicate how test results should be processed for concise presentation
Ch. 8 Similitude and Dimensional Analysis
8-33
[Problem 8.48] Head loss in a pipe flow
, , , , , , 0Lf h D l V g
Repeating variables: , ,l V
1 1 , , ,Lf h l V
2 1 , , ,f D l V
3 3 , , ,f l V
4 4 , , ,f g l V
(i) 1a b c dLh l V
0 0 0
3
c da b M L
M L t L LL t
: 0M c
: 0 3L a b c d
: 0t d b a
1
a
Lh
l
1If a : 1Lh
l
(ii) 2a b c dD l V
0 0 0
3
c da b M L
M L t L LL t
Pipe diameter
Ch. 8 Similitude and Dimensional Analysis
8-34
: 0M c ①
: 0 3L a b c d ②
: 0t d ③
② : 0 a b b a
2
aD
l
1If a : 2
D
l
(iii) 3a b c dl V
0 0 0
3
a c dbM M L
M L t LLT L t
: 0M a c ① c d c a
: 0 3L a b c d ②
: 0t a d d a ③
② 3 0d b d d b d b a
3a a a al V
1If a 3 Rel V
(iv) 4a b c dg l V
0 0 0
2 3
a c dbL M L
M L t Lt L t
Ch. 8 Similitude and Dimensional Analysis
8-35
: 0M c ①
: 0 3L a b c d ②
: 0 2t a d ③
③ 2d a
② 0 0 2a b a b a
2
4 2
ala a a g
g l VV
1
2If a : 4 Fr
V
g l
, , Re, Fr 0Lh lf
l D
, Re, FrLh lf
l D
Ch. 8 Similitude and Dimensional Analysis
8-36
Homework Assignment # 8
Due: 1 week from today
Prob. 8.6
Prob. 8.10
Prob. 8.14
Prob. 8.20
Prob. 8.24
Prob. 8.30
Prob. 8.56
Prob. 8.59