Antifungal, Antibacterial, and Antioxidant Activities of ...
CHAPTER 6 ANTIBACTERIAL AND ANTIFUNGAL ACTIVITIES OF ...
Transcript of CHAPTER 6 ANTIBACTERIAL AND ANTIFUNGAL ACTIVITIES OF ...
CHAPTER 6
ANTIBACTERIAL AND ANTIFUNGAL ACTIVITIES OF BIOACTIVE
COMPOUNDS FROM GRAMINICOLOUS FUNGI
6.1 Introduction
There is an ever-growing need for new and useful compounds to provide
assistance and relief in all aspects of human health. Drug resistance in bacteria, the
appearance of life-threatening viruses, the recurrent problems of diseases in persons
with organ transplants, and the tremendous increase in the incidence of fungal
infections in the world’s population all underscore our inadequacy to cope with these
medical problems (Trinci, 1992; Kirk et al., 1993, 2002; Moore and Chiu, 2001;
Thaithatgoon et al., 2004; Peláez, 2006). Added to this are enormous difficulties in
raising enough food in certain regions of the earth to support local human populations.
Environmental degradation, loss of biodiversity, and spoilage of land and water also
add to problems facing mankind (Strobel et al., 2004; Peláez, 2003; 2004; Guo et al.,
2008). Recently, over 50 contributions featured in a symposium dedicated to fungal
secondary metabolites (extrolites) at the 8th International Mycological Congress
(IMC8, Cairns, Australia, 2006; Stadler and Keller, 2008). This refers to the many
interesting and benefits of bioactive compounds.
The potential pharmaceutical benefits of secondary metabolites of fungi have
been investigated for about 80 years. The search for new bioactive compounds from
fungi started with the discovery of penicillin (Fleming, 1929), a potent antibiotic
against gram-positive bacteria, which was produced by Penicillium notatum. A further
milestone in the history of fungal products for medicinal use was the discovery of the
196
immunosuppressant cyclosporine which is produced, e.g., by Tolypocladium inflatum
and Cylindrocarpon lucidum (Dreyfuss et al., 1976; Csapo et al., 2007; Nisha and
Ramasamy, 2008). It was first discovered as an antifungal metabolite and later
discovered to be immunosuppressive, which made cyclosporine useful for treatment
following organ transplantation (Goodman Gilman et al., 1985; Singh et al., 2006).
The antifungal agent griseoflavin isolated from Penicillium griseofulvum (Rehm,
1980) and the cholesterol biosynthesis inhibitor lovastatin isolated from Aspergillus
terreus (Albert et al., 1980) are two feature examples supporting today’s great interest
in new bioactive compounds from fungi (Gullo et al., 2006; Hoffmeister and Keller,
2007; Stadler and Keller, 2008; Panagiotou et al., 2009).
Many groups of fungi are widely recognized as prolific sources of bioactive
secondary metabolites that might represent useful leads for the development of new
pharmaceutical bioactive compounds (John et al., 1999; Strobel et al., 1999; Brady et
al., 2000; Singh et al., 2000; Yamada et al., 2002; Gullo et al., 2006; Hoffmeister and
Keller, 2007; Shwab and Keller, 2008). So far more than 4000 fungal bioactive
compounds are described (Dreyfuss and Chapela, 1994) and 5000–7000 fungal
species have been examined with respect to their chemical characterization
(Hawksworth, 1991). Hawksworth (1995) approximated the probable number of
existing fungi to be 1.5 million with 80,000 being described. Since more than 1.5 x
106 endophytic fungi are thought to thrive within the estimated 270,000 species of
vascular plants, the prospects for additional discoveries of metabolites from these
fungi are promising (Dreyfuss and Chapela, 1994; ; Stadler and Keller, 2008).
Fungi represent an enormous source for natural products with diverse
chemical characters and activities. Of special interest are creative fungal strains.
197
Creativity in this sense is defined as the ability to produce compounds of interest to
humans (Gullo et al., 2006; Hoffmeister and Keller, 2007; Stadler and Keller, 2008;
Shwab and Keller, 2008). Intelligent screening methods have been applied in the
search for novel molecules (Pointing and Hyde, 2001; Damveld et al., 2008; Rosén et
al., 2009). The potential is enormous for the discovery of valuable natural products
resulting from a directed search and screening of fungi from unexplored habitats
(Conception et al., 2001; Strobel and Daisy, 2003; Strobel et al., 2004; Gullo et al.,
2006; Hoffmeister and Keller, 2007). It is expected that new drugs of biotechnological
importance will be discovered with increased focus on tropical endophytic fungi.
Fungal species screened for secondary metabolites using modern techniques are less
than 1% of those that may exist (Nisbet and Fox, 1991; Gullo et al., 2006;
Hoffmeister and Keller, 2007; Rosén et al., 2009).
The natural function of secondary metabolites is often unknown, but it is
assumed that they play an important role in chemical defense and communication
(Krohn, 1996; Gullo et al., 2006). Many of them have been suggested to act as
pheromones, antifeedants or repellents, and as regulators in the development of
organism (Sterner, 1995; Gullo et al., 2006) suggested that the biosynthesis of
secondary metabolites does not occur randomly but is correlated with ecological
factors.
Most fungi studied to date have been isolated from soil and were proven to
have a high creativity index, i.e. new and interesting secondary metabolites could be
isolated. Genera such as Aspergillus, Penicillium, Acremonium, Fusarium, all typical
soil isolates, are known for their ability to synthesize diverse chemical structures.
Dreyfuss (1986), however, described a problem which is often encountered during
198
microbiological screening of fungal isolates for their secondary metabolites.
Increasingly, known metabolites are rediscovered making screening programs less
efficient. This may be partially because the same fungal strains are reisolated when
investigating an ecological niche. This could also result in the rediscovery of known
compounds as the same taxa produce the same metabolites with high coincidence
(Loeffler, 1984; Gullo et al., 2006; Hoffmeister and Keller, 2007).
The assumption can be made that certain physical and biological situations in
the natural environment favour the production of a diverse range of secondary
metabolites (Dreyfuss and Chapela, 1994; Gullo et al., 2006; Hoffmeister and Keller,
2007). This indicates that it might be more useful to investigate fungal isolates from
other ecological niches than soil in order to make more direct approach towards
creative and noval fungal taxa. Some relatively enexplored fungal groups derived
from such ecosystems are, endophytic fungi, fresh-water fungi, marine fungi and
saprobic fungi from various substrata (Dreyfuss and Chapela, 1994).
During the investigation of the saprobic and endophytic fungi of grasses in
Thailand, the studies isolated many species of graminicolous fungi including the
novel endophytic species e.g. Periconia siamensis (CMUGE015) (Bhilabutra et al.,
2007), Dactylaria endograminicola and Dactylaria endograminicola (CMUGE125)
(Bhilabutra et al., in press). These were selected for screening for bioactive
compounds that have present antibacterial and antifungal activity. The compounds
were extracted, purified and analyzed for structure elucidation nand identification, as
well as screeing for biological activities. The details of this study are presented in this
Chapter.
199
6.2 Materials and Methods
6.2.1 Fungal isolation
Fifty fungi isolated from grasses as described in Chapters 3 and 4 were
selected for further study including Periconia siamensis CMUGE015 (Figure 6.1a)
and Dactylaria endograminicola CMUGE0125 (Figure 6.1b). The isolation methods
used have been described as Chapters 3 and 4. A list of 50 selected fungi and their
geogrphic location , host and mode of life are presented in Appendix F.
b. a.
Figure 6.1 Two fungi selected for screening of bioactive compounds, a. Periconia
siamensis; b. Dactylaria endograminicola.
200
6.2.2 Test organisms
6.2.2.1 Bacterial strains (for MIC test)
Five bacterial strains were used as test organisms including Bacillus cereus,
Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA Methicillin
Resistant) and Pseudomonas aeroginosa (Figure 6.2), and were obtained from the
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University.. All bacterial
strains were separately cultured and maintained on nutrient agar (NA, Appendix A) at
room temperature (27–30 °C).
Figure 6.2 Bacterial strains used as test organisms for screening microbial activities.
(www.magma.ca/~scimat/b_cereus.htm; www3.niaid.nih.gov/.../image_library.htm;
http://www.gasdetection.com/news2/health_news_digest84.html; http://aleas.exteen.
com/page/2; http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2007/10/staphylococcus_
aureus_dont_pic.php).
201
6.2.2.2 Fungal strains (for MIC test and dual culture test)
Candida albicans (ATCC90028, obtained from the American Type Culture
Collection) and Penicillium avellaneum (obtained from Kunming Botanical Garden,
Kunming, China), Colletotrichum musae (anthracnose which cause of anthracnose
disease in banana ) and Fusarium oxysporum (Fusarium wilt is the one of the most
destructive and notorious diseases of plants) were cultured and maintained at room
temperature on malt peptone agar (MPA, Appendix A) and/or yeast glucose agar
(YGA, Appendix A). C. musae and F. oxysporum were obtained from stock culture of
the Biology Department, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University.Test organisms
for screening of antifungal activities are illustrated in Figure 6.3.
Figure 6.3 Fungal strains used as test organisms for screening antifungal activities.
(www.christinas-home-remedies.com; www.biology.ed.ac.uk; www.bspp.org.uk;
http://botit.botany.wisc.edu).
202
6.2.3 Preparation of assay plates
Cells of C. albicans were scraped off the agar and inoculated into 5 ml of malt
peptone broth. The tubes were then incubated for 16 h at room temperature on a
reciprocal shaker (130 rpm). For P. avellaneum, 0.1% of Tween 80 was added before
inoculation with one loop of conidia. The mixture was then vortexed, and
immediately used for assay plates. One ml of inoculum of each test organism was
added to 200 ml of appropriate medium at 55 °C, poured into assay plates, and
allowed to solidify. Test organisms were subcultured into potato dextrose agar (PDA,
Appendix A) plates and prepared for dual culture test.
6.2.4 Cultivation of fungi for production of antibacterial substance
For initial screening various media (F1, F2, F3, F4 and F5, see Appendix A,
Cheeptham et al., 1999) were used for culture fermentations. All selected fungi were
subcultured on to PDA plates and incubated for 1 week. After incubation, 8 mm discs
of mycelium were transferred, one per flask, to the five fermentation media. The
cultures were incubated at room temperature for 7 days on a reciprocal shaker at 130
rpm. The supernatant was then filtered by passing through Whatman No. 4 filter paper
and used immediately to test for inhibitory activity. The results of screening for
antibacterial substances are presented in Table 6.2. The supernatant was also used to
examine for inhibitory antifungal activity against C. albicans and P. avellaneum. The
results of this study are presented in Table 6.3.
203
6.2.5 Screening of antifungal activities using dual culture test
Bioactivity against Colletotrichum musae and Fusarium oxysporum was
screened by inoculating each pathogen with each potential inhibitor producing strain
in dual cultures on PDA in 9 cm Petri dishes. The agar medium was inoculated with a
5 mm diameter agar disk of the actively growing selected mycelium positioned at the
opposite side of a 5 mm diameter agar disk of the actively growing pathogen. The
distance between discs was approximately 5 cm. The trial was replicated five times
for each pairing. Mycelial plugs of the selected fungi were taken from the margins of
young colonies growing on PDA. The two colonies were allowed to grow towards
each other. Plates inoculated with the test fungi only were used as controls. All plates
were then incubated at 30 °C. The diameter of the colony in the control, and each
treatment was recorded 1 week after inoculation (Figure 6.4). Percentage inhibition
was measured using the following formula.
The details of results of this study are presented in Table 6.3.
Percentage of inhibition = Radius of pathogen in dual culture plate (D) x 100 Radius of pathogen in control plate(C)
204
D
C
Figure 6.4 Dual culture test used for antifungal activities test. Radius of pathogen in
control plate (C) and radius of pathogen in dual culture plate (D) were used to
calculate the percentage inhibition.
6.2.6 Selected strains for antimicrobial test
The strains exhibiting the best inhibition against the test fungi were Dactylaria
endograminicola (CMUGE1125), Periconia siamensis (CMUGE015) and
Eupenicillium sherii (CMUGE1047). These were inoculated from the stock PDA
slants onto PDA plates and incubated at 30 °C for 7 days to their selected suitable
production medium (F1, F2, F3, F4 and F5) were observed for optimization of
antibacterial and antifungal productions. The result of optimization of their media is
presented in Tables 6.4a and 6.4b.
6.2.7 Optimization of antibacterial production
205
Optimal fermentation conditions have to be identified to achieve maximum
productivity of antibacterial producers, therefore it was decided to study the effect of
various factors on antibacterial production in liquid culture by the selected strains of
Periconia siamensis CMUGE015, Dactylaria endograminicola CMUGE1125 and
Eupennicillium sherii CMUGE1047.
6.2.7.1 Fermentation media
Various media (F1, F2, F3, F4, F5 [Cheeptham et al., 1999], PDB and malt
extract) were used as fermentation media. Periconia siamensis CMUGE015 was
subcultured from stock culture on the PDA plates and incubated for 7 days. After
incubation, one fungal disk (bored with cork borer 8 mm diam) was transferred to 50
ml of each fermentation media (Appendix A) in 250 ml Erlenmeyer flasks. The flasks
were incubated at room temperature for 7 days on a reciprocal shaker at 130 rpm. A
paper disc agar diffusion assay method was used to check inhibitory effect against the
test organisms.
6.2.7.2 C and N sources
The effects of carbon and nitrogen sources on antibacterial production were
studied. Various carbon sources (fructose, glucose, lactose, maltose, manitol and
sucrose) and nitrogen sources (malt extract, peptone, polypeptone, soy bean meal and
yeast extract) were added to 50 ml of a basal medium, in 250 ml Erlenmeyer flasks
and incubated at room temperature on a reciprocal shaker at 130 rpm. The incubation
time was studied for the production of antibacterial compound. The crude extracts of
206
cultures were obtained and a paper disc agar diffusion assay method was used to
check inhibitory effects.
6.2.7.3 pH effect on antibacterial production
One disc of Periconia siamensis strain CMUGE015 was inoculated into 250
ml Erlenmeyer flasks containing 50 ml of basal medium with optimal C and N source.
The pH of the fermentation media was adjusted to 5.5, 6.0, 7.0, 7.5 and 8.0 by adding
HCl and /or NaOH. Flasks were incubated at room temperature on a reciprocal shaker
at 130 rpm. The optimum incubation time for production of the antibacterial
metabolite(s) was 14 days. The crude extract of cultures was obtained and a paper
disc agar diffusion assay method was used to check inhibitory effects.
6.2.7.4 Temperature effect on antibacterial production
The temperature effect for antifungal production was tested by fermenting the
fungal strain with optimum pH and incubation at different temperatures (25, 30, 37,
and 45 °C). The crude extract of cultures was obtained and paper disc agar diffusion
assay method was used to check inhibitory effects.
6.2.7.5 Optimum time for antibacterial production
The optimum time needed for antibacterial production was established by
inoculating the fungal strain in the best basal medium, then incubating at room
temperature on a reciprocal shaker at 130 rpm. Some extract of the culture was
removed daily for 13 days. A paper disc agar diffusion assay method was used to
check for highest antifungal activity.
207
6.2.7.6 The effect of pH, temperature and duration on antifungal experiment
Dactylaria endograminicola CMUGE1125 was selected as the best strain to
inhibit the growth of C. albicans, P. avellaneum, C. musae and F. oxysporum in liquid
culture. One agar disc of D. endograminicola CMUGE1125 mycelium was inoculated
into 250 ml Erlenmeyer flask containing 50 ml of fermentation media at various pH
(5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5 and 8.0) and the flask was incubated for 14 days at room
temperature on a reciprocal shaker set at 220 rpm. The optimum temperature for
antifungal production was tested by fermenting the fungal production strain at the
optimum pH and incubation at different temperatures (25, 30, 37 and 45 °C). The
paper disc agar diffusion assay method was used to check for inhibitory effects. The
optimum time for fermentation was established by cultivation of the producing strain
at the optimum pH and temperature and then some of the crude extract from the
culture was removed daily for 13 days with sterile Pasture pipettes, and centrifuged at
4000 rpm for 15 minutes. The supernatant were used to test antifungal activity. The
paper disc agar diffusion assay method was used to check for inhibitory effects.
6.2.8 Thin layer chromatography (TLC)
Preliminary characterization of the antibacterial and antifungal compounds
from the crude extract of liquid fermentation of Periconia siamensis CMUGE015 and
Dactylaria endograminicola CMUGE1125 were determined by thin layer
chromatography (TLC). Ten microliters of the dried fungal extract dissolved in a
small amount of ethyl acetate, were spotted on a silica gel plate (Merck aluminum
sheet, 60 F254). The compounds were separated using a dichloromethane:methanol
solvent system. Separated components were detected by iodine vapor and
208
bioautography was carried out to identify those components that had antibacterial
and/or antifungal activities. The TLC plate was placed in assay plates, as previously
described for the paper disc assay, except that after one hour the TLC plate was
removed and the assay plates were incubated overnight at room temperature. The
positions of the inhibitory zones of antibacterial and antifungal activities was
measured to determine a Rf value for the extract component. These were compared
with the band which appeared following exposure to iodine vapor.
6.2.9 Extraction and concentration
At the end of the fermentation, the cultures were harvested by filtration. The
culture broths were extracted twice with an equal volume of ethyl acetate (EtOAc).
The extracts were pooled and dried in a rotary evaporator (BÜCHI Switzerland) at
45ºC under reduced pressure. The extract residue was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide
(DMSO) and stored at 4ºC until the bioassays (described below) could be conducted.
6.2.10 Characterization of bioactive compounds from Periconia siamensis
6.2.10.1 Culture conditions and extraction
Periconia siamensis CMUGE015 was grown on 100 plates of F1 medium for
2 weeks at 28°C until it completely covered each plate. The colonies formed on each
plate were cut into small pieces (0.5 x 0.5 cm) using a sterilized cutter. The agar
pieces were placed in a 3L Erlenmeyer flask and ethyl acetate (2L) was used to
extract the metabolites produced. The flasks were shaken on a reciprocal shaker at
180 rpm for 30 min. The process was repeated 5 times. The combined extracts (10L)
209
were dried by flash evaporation at 40°C and the recovery yield of dry material was
about 2.8 g.
6.2.10.2 Fractionation and purification of the compounds
The dried extract was mixed with silica gel 60 (size 0.015-0.040 mm, Merck)
and packed into a chromatography column. Fractionation using increased
concentrations of Hexane:EtOAc:MeOH (100:0:0, 80:20:0, 60:40:0, 40:60:0,
20:80:0, 0:100:0, 0:99:1, 0:98:2, 0:96:4, 0:92:2, 0:90:10, 0:80:20, 0:60:40, 0:40:60,
0:20:80 and 0:0:100) produced fifty five 25ml fractions. These were evaporated to
dryness, weighed and fractionated again by column chromatography (silica gel 60 size
0.063-0.200 mm, Merck). A white crystalline material (compound 1, Fig.6.14a) was
recovered in fraction 7 and a yellow powder (compound 2, Fig. 6.14b) found in
fraction 5 were active in the initial antibacterial assay.
The white crystals were washed in cold EtOAc for purification (120 mg). The
material from fraction 5 (194 mg dry weight) was subjected to repeated fractionation
by column chromatography, using, Hexane:EtOAc (60:40) as eluant, and the product
(105 mg) was recovered in fractions 12-16. These were combined and checked by
TLC. The two compounds were screened again for their antibacterial activity against
the test organisms as decribed below, using the paper disk method (Venugopal and
Venugopal, 1994).
6.2.10.3 Structure elucidation of compounds
1H NMR (300 MHz) and 13C NMR (75 MHz) spectra were analysed at the
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Silpakorn University, Thailand using a
210
Bruker DPX300 spectrometer, with TMS (δH 0 ppm) and CDCl3 (δ13C 77.0 ppm) as
internal references. Melting points were determined using an electrothermal melting
point apparatus. Optical rotations were measured with a JASCO J-810
spectropolarimeter. IR spectra were recorded on an FT-IR system 2000 (Perkin-Elmer)
spectrometer. Mass spectra were recorded on a JEOL JMS- X505WA mass
spectrometer. The method for elucidation of compounds is presented in Figure 6.5.
6.2.11 Bioassays
6.2.11.1 Screening for antibacterial metabolite production
Ethyl acetate extracts of culture filtrates, and column chromatography eluants
of similar extracts of agar plates, were assayed for the presence of metabolites and for
antibacterial activity using a paper disk diffusion assay method. Sterile paper disks (8
mm diam., Advatec, Toyo Roshi Kaisa, LTD., Japan) were soaked in the extracts and
allowed to air dry, before they were placed on seeded assay plates. Controls were
disks impregnated with solvents, used for extraction of culture filtrates and in column
chromatography, which had been allowed to air dry. All assay plates were then
incubated at 37ºC for 24 hours for all bacterial strains. Nutrient broth cultures of the
test bacteria organisms were used to produce inocula for the bioassay plates.
Screening for antibacterial metabolite production was conducted in triplicate and data
generated was analyzed using the SPSS v.10 package for one-way analysis of
variance (ANOVA). For the statistic calculated for this study see Appendix G.
211
UV
MS
NMR
IR
Figure 6.5 Spectroscopic analysis methods used in this study.
6.2.11.2 Minimum inhibitory concentration (MICs)
Purified compounds 1 and 2 were assayed to determine the MICs of these
compounds against Bacillus cereus, Listeria monocytogenes, MRSA and
Pseudomonas aeroginosa. Antibacterial activity was determined by the 2-fold
microtiter broth dilution method (Kim et al., 2002). Dilutions of the test compound
dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were added to each well of a 96-well
microtiter plate containing a fixed volume of standard methods broth (SM broth,
Difco) (final 0.5% DMSO). Each well was inoculated with bacteria (105 CFU/mL)
and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. The MIC was calculated as the concentration at which
no growth of bacteria was observed. An overview of minimum inhibitory
212
concentration (MIC) test is illustrated in Figure 6.6. The results of MIC are presented
in Figure 6.7.
Figure 6.6 Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) test.
213
b
a.
Figure 6.7 Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) test for purification compound
from this study, in different concentrations, against selected pathogenic organisms a:
before test, b: after incubation at 37°C over night, showing the clear zone in different
concentration with different test organism.
214
6.3 Results
6.3.1 Screening of isolates as potential sources of antibacterial and antifungal
agents
One hundred and twenty three fungal isolated stains from grasses were
examined for their potential antibacterial activities against pathogenic
microorganisms. Sixty-five strains were isolated as saprobic fungi from both T.
latifolia and S. spontaneum While 58 strains were isolated as endophytic fungi from
Thysanolaena latifolia and V. zizanioides. Thirty-three strains are ascomycetes while
90 strains are anamorphic fungi (75 hyphomycetes and 15 coelomycetes). All taxa are
listed in Appendix F.
The definition of the best strains were those that produced zones of inhibition
>15mm. The most interested isolates were Periconia siamensis CMUGE015,
Dactylaria endograminicola CMUGE1125 and Eupenicillium sherii CMUGE1047.
However, some other strains were more specific displaying either antibacterial or
antifungal activities only against some test microorgansims e.g. Cladosporium
cladosporioides CMUG1040, Dactylaria dimorphospora CMUGS1055,
Eupenicillium sp. CMUGE3048, Periconia bissoides CMUGS1003, Periconia
digitata CMUGS2049, Periconia sp. CMUGS2006, Periconia sp. CMUGE3016,
Pestalotiopsis sp. CMUGE1025, and Pyricularia sp. CMUGS1021. The results of the
antibacterial activities tests are presented in Table 6.1.
215
Table 6.1 List of selected fungi and their antibacterial activities. Strin no. Taxa Microbial activities tests BCa ECb LMc MRSAd PAe CMUGE1004 Pestalotiopsis sp. ++ - + - + CMUGE1007 Fusarium sp. ++ - + - + CMUGE1008 Gaeumannomyces sp. + - + - + CMUGE1009 Zygosporium sp. + - - - - CMUGE1011 Bactrodesmium longisporum ++ - ++ - - CMUGE1012 Alternaria tenuis + - - - - CMUGE015 Periconia siamensis*# ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ CMUGE1016 Cladosporium cladosporioides# ++ + + ++ + CMUGE1018 Neotyphodium coenophialum + - - - - CMUGE1019 Nigrospora oryzae + - - + - CMUGE1023 Arthrinium euphorbiae - - + - - CMUGE1028 Humicola grisea + - + - - CMUGE1033 Gilmaniella humicola + - - - - CMUGE1038 Helicosporium phragmitis - - - + - CMUGE1043 Xylaria sp. + - - - - CMUGE1046 Trichoconis sp. + - - - - CMUGE1047 Eupenicillium sheri# ++ + ++ ++ + CMUGE1050 Eupennicillium sp. ++ + - - ++ CMUGE1057 Thermomyces sp. ++ - + - - CMUGE1066 Acremonium polychrome + - + - - CMUGE1077 Balansia sp. ++ - + - CMUGE1107 Scolecobasidium sp. + - + - - CMUGE1123 Phomopsis sp. + - - - - CMUGE1131 Stachybotrys sp. + - - - - CMUGE1134 Nodulisporium gregarium - - - + - CMUGE1159 Paecilomyces sp. 1 + - + - - CMUGE1078 Idriella lunata + - - - - CMUGE1220 Colletotrichum gloeosporioides + - + + - CMUGE1222 Curvularia alternata. ++ - + + - CMUGE1125 Dactylaria endograminicola *# ++ + ++ ++ + CMUGE3002 Periconia sp. 1 ++ - + - + CMUGE3005 Fusarium semitectum ++ - + - + CMUGE3016 Periconia sp. 2 ++ + - ++ + CMUGE3017 Helminthosporium sp. 1 + - - - - CMUGE3023 Gelasinospora sp. - - - + - CMUGE3025 Arthrobotrys sp. 1 + - - - - CMUGE3027 Monacrosporium sp. ++ - + + - CMUGE3029 Geotrichum sp. - - - + - CMUGE3034 Phoma sp. # ++ - ++ + + CMUGE3037 Glomomerella sp. + - - - - CMUGE3042 Nigrospora sacchari + - - - - CMUGE3043 Nigrospora sp. 2 ++ - - - - CMUGE3045 Ellisembia vaga + - + - - CMUGE3048 Eupenicillium sp. 1 ++ + - ++ - CMUGE3054 Dactylella sp. 1 + - + - - CMUGE3055 Dactylaria sp. 3# + + ++ - + CMUGE3057 Dactylaria sp. 1 ++ - + - - CMUGE3060 Pearepichloe sp. - - + - - CMUGE3067 Acremonium sp. 1 + + - - CMUGE3074 Acremonium sp. 2 ++ - + - - CMUGE3087 Bactrodesmium sp. + - + - -
216
Table 6.1 (Continued). Strin no. Taxa Microbial activities tests BCa ECb LMc MRSAd PAe
CMUGE3101 Colletotrichum sp. 1 + - - - CMUGE3123 Cochliobolus sp. 1 ++ - + - - CMUGE3125 Cochliobolus bicolor ++ - - - CMUGE3127 Colletotrichum sp. 2 - + + - - CMUGE3155 Nodulisporium sp. - - - - - CMUGE3158 Paecilomyces sp. - - + - - CMUGE3170 Papulaspora sp. 1 - - - - - CMUGS1001 Tetraploa aristata + - - - - CMUGS1003 Periconia byssoides# ++ + + + - CMUGS1004 Verticillium sp. + - - - - CMUGS1005 Acremonium kiliense ++ - ++ - - CMUGS1007 Stachylidium bicolor - - - - - CMUGS1008 Periconia cookei + - + - - CMUGS1010 Arthrinium sp. + - - - - CMUGS1011 Pestalotiopsis versicolor + - - + - CMUGS1012 Chaetophoma sp. + - - - - CMUGS1014 Periconia macrospinosa + - - - - CMUGS1015 Xylaria sp. + - - - - CMUGS1017 Drumopama monoseta* ++ - - - - CMUGS1018 Oxydothis sp. - - + - - CMUGS1021 Pyricularia sp.# ++ - ++ + - CMUGS1022 Phoma sp. 2 + - + - - CMUGS1023 Guaemannomyces graminis ++ - - - - CMUGS1025 Pestalotiopsis sp. ++ - ++ + + CMUGS1026 Stachybotrys echinata ++ + - - - CMUGS1027 Nigrospora oryzae + - - - - CMUGS1029 Magnaporthe salvinii + - - - - CMUGS1030 Chaetosphaeria lentomita + - - - - CMUGS1032 Curvularia lunata + - + + - CMUGS1033 Phomopsis sp. + - - - - CMUGS1034 Spegazzinia deightonii + - + - - CMUGS1035 Fusarium oxysporum ++ - + - - CMUGS1036 Massarina phragmitocola - - - - - CMUGS1037 Stilbella sp. + - - - - CMUGS1038 Dactylaria triseptata ++ - + + - CMUGS1040 Cladosporium cladosporioides ++ + - + - CMUGS1041 Sporidesmium cookei + - - - - CMUGS1042 Dactylella ellipsospora ++ - - - - CMUGS1043 Dendrographium sp.* + - ++ - - CMUGS1044 Pleurophragmium simplex - - - - - CMUGS1045 Lophiosphaeria sp. + - - - - CMUGS1047 Pycnothyriopsis sp.* - - + - - CMUGS1049 Didymella sp. + - - - - CMUGS1051 Dactylaria sp. + - + - - CMUGS1055 Dactylaria dimorphospora ++ + + + - CMUGS1057 Lophaeostoma sp. + - + + - CMUGS2001 Phoma sp. 1 + - - - - CMUGS2006 Periconia sp. 1 ++ + + + - CMUGS2007 Coelomycete (RP)* + - - - - CMUGS2009 Dictyosporium sp. 1 + - - + - CMUGS2011 Massarina sp. 4* ++ - + + - CMUGS2013 Acrodictys sacchari + - - - - CMUGS2014 Myrothecium sp. 1 + - - - -
217
Table 6.1 (Continued). Strin no. Taxa Microbial activities tests BSa ECb LMc MRSAd PAe
CMUGS2015 Massarina sp. 2 + - - - - CMUGS2016 Spegazzinia tessarthra + - - - - CMUGS2017 Dictyosporium oblongum ++ - + - - CMUGS2022 Cercospora koepkei ++ - ++ - + CMUGS2024 Annulatascus sp. 1 + - - - - CMUGS2025 Drechslera stenospila ++ - + - - CMUGS2028 Ascomycetes* + - - - - CMUGS2033 Arecophila sp. 5* + - - - - CMUGS2034 Phialophorophoma sp. 1 + - - - - CMUGS2036 Fusarium sp. ++ - + + - CMUGS2037 Apiospora montagnei - - - - - CMUGS2039 Periconia echinochloae# ++ + + - + CMUGS2040 Ascomycetes* + - - - - CMUGS2041 Dictyoarthrinium saccharii - - - - - CMUGS2043 Arecophila sp. 1 + - - - - CMUGS2044 Lophiostroma sp.2 - - - - - CMUGS2049 Periconia digitata# ++ + ++ + + CMUGS2052 Ophiobolus leptosporus + - - - - CMUGS2060 Colletotrichum sp. 1 + - - - - BCa = Bacillus cereus; ECb= Escherichia coli; LMc = Listeria monocytogenes; MRSAd = Staphylococcus aureus; PAe = Pseudomonas aeruginosa * new species/ or probably new species in this study. # highly microbial activities. ++ = clear zone more than 15 mm; + = clear zone less than 15 mm; - = no clear zone
The same 123 fungal strains were used for antifungal activities test against C.
albicans, P. avellaneum, C. musae and F. oxysporum as target organisms. The
antagonism of selected fungi against C. albicans and P. avellaneum growth is
reported as diameter of clear zone, while percentage inhibition zone is reported
against C. musae and F. oxysporum. The most significant isolate in these tests was D.
endograminicola CMUGE1125 showing 85.54% and 64.67% inhibition against C.
musae and F. oxysporum, respectively. The following strains were less active, but still
potentially interesting were E. sherii CMUGE1047 (70.33% and 60.00% in
inhibition), Eupenicillium sp., CMUGE1050 (69.23% and 60.00%), Phoma sp.
CMUGS102 (67.19% and 50.94%), Periconia siamensis CMUGE015 (69.30% and
54.18%), Pestalotiopsis sp. CMUGE1004 (69.23% and 60.00%), Pyricularia sp.
218
CMUGS1021 (70.15% and 69.36%) and Verticillium sp. CMUGS1004 (69.23% and
51.04%). Data of their antifungal activities are presented in Table 6.2. The highly
potential antifungal activities led to the selection of Periconia siamensis CMUGE015
and Dactylaria endograminicola CMUGE1125 for more detailed investigations to
optimize suitable media that favour the production of their bioactive compounds.
Table 6.2 List of selected fungi and their antifungal activities. Strin no. Taxa Antifungal activities tests CAa1 PAb1 CMc2 FOd2
CMUGE1004 Pestalotiopsis sp. ++ - 69.23 60.00 CMUGE1007 Fusarium sp. - - 55.67 17.14 CMUGE1008 Gaeumannomyces sp. + + 62.00 37.60 CMUGE1009 Zygosporium sp. - - 7.69 2.13 CMUGE1011 Bactrodesmium longisporum - - 49.54 64.67 CMUGE1012 Alternaria tenuis - - 51.53 45.83 CMUGE015 Periconia siamensis*# ++ + 63.30 51.18 CMUGE1016 Cladosporium cladosporioides ++ - 0.00 1.60 CMUGE1018 Neotyphodium coenophialum + + 66.15 23.81 CMUGE1019 Nigrospora oryzae - - 57.23 41.82 CMUGE1023 Arthrinium euphorbiae - - 67.19 32.36 CMUGE1028 Humicola grisea - - 53.67 30.83 CMUGE1033 Gilmaniella humicola - - 55.69 43.75 CMUGE1038 Helicosporium phragmitis + - 45.83 28.33 CMUGE1043 Xylaria sp. - + 60.31 50.63 CMUGE1046 Trichoconis sp. - - 64.92 47.50 CMUGE1047 Eupenicillium sherii# ++ + 70.33 60.00 CMUGE1050 Eupennicillium sp. + + 69.23 60.00 CMUGE1057 Thermomyces sp. - - 53.85 41.25 CMUGE1066 Acremonium polychrome + - 55.69 44.53 CMUGE1077 Balansia sp. - - 64.62 49.38 CMUGE1107 Scolecobasidium sp. + - 64.92 47.50 CMUGE1123 Phomopsis sp. + - 62.00 46.67 CMUGE1131 Stachybotrys sp. - - 67.19 43.00 CMUGE1134 Nodulisporium gregarium - - 55.69 20.95 CMUGE1159 Paecilomyces sp. 1 - - 64.00 48.75 CMUGE1178 Idriella lunata - - 57.54 56.73 CMUGE1220 Colletotrichum gloeosporioides - - 0.00 5.00 CMUGE1222 Curvularia alternata. + - 58.46 30.83 CMUGE1125 Dactylaria endograminicola *# ++ ++ 85.54 64.67 CMUGE3002 Periconia sp. 1 + - 67.19 51.04 CMUGE3005 Fusarium semitectum ++ - 59.70 44.00 CMUGE3016 Periconia sp. 2 ++ + 53.00 35.25 CMUGE3017 Helminthosporium sp.1 - - 65.67 49.82 CMUGE3023 Gelasinospora sp. - - 7.69 12.45 CMUGE3025 Arthrobotrys sp. 1 - - 24.61 36.67 CMUGE3027 Monacrosporium sp. - - 51.33 45.83 CMUGE3029 Geotrichum sp - - 65.31 39.00
219
Table 6.2 (Continued). Strin no. Taxa Antifungal activities tests CAa1 PAb1 CMc2 FOd2
CMUGE3034 Phoma sp.# + + 62.00 54.18 CMUGE3037 Glomomerella sp. - - 50.15 49.82 CMUGE3042 Nigrospora sacchari - - 49.54 44.73 CMUGE3043 Nigrospora sp. 2 - - 56.00 12.45 CMUGE3045 Ellisembia vaga - - 57.54 45.83 CMUGE3048 Eupenicillium sp. 1 - - 66.15 30.00 CMUGE3054 Dactyrella sp. 1 ++ + 65.31 35.00 CMUGE3055 Dactylaria sp. 3 + - 64.62 43.75 CMUGE3057 Dactylaria sp. 1 - + 54.46 42.50 CMUGE3060 Pearepichloe sp. - - 60.31 37.27 CMUGE3067 Acremonium sp. 1 + - 58.77 35.25 CMUGE3074 Acremonium sp. 2 + + 53.85 18.87 CMUGE3087 Bactrodesmium sp. + - 60.93 12.45 CMUGE3101 Colletotrichum sp. 1 + + 69.23 51.04 CMUGE3123 Cochiobolus sp. 1 + - 65.94 45.83 CMUGE3125 Cochliobolus bicolor + - 69.03 38.91 CMUGE3127 Collectotrichum sp. 2 + + 56.42 28.33 CMUGE3155 Nodulisporium sp. + - 7.69 50.6 CMUGE3158 Paecilomyces sp. - - 49.54 5.00 CMUGE3170 Papulaspora sp. 1 - - 57.54 41.46 CMUGS1001 Tetraploa aristata - - 55.69 17.74 CMUGS1003 Periconia bissoides + - 65.31 44.00 CMUGS1004 Verticillium sp.# + ++ 69.23 51.04 CMUGS1005 Acremonium kiliense + - 59.38 18.87 CMUGS1007 Stachylidium bicolor - - 62.00 36.67 CMUGS1008 Periconia cookei + - 65.33 12.45 CMUGS1010 Arthrinium sp. - - 65.83 36.00 CMUGS1011 Pestalotiopsis versicolor + + 67.19 28.33 CMUGS1012 Chaetophoma sp. ++ - 66.63 50.94 CMUGS1014 Periconia macrospinosa - + 64.17 39.62 CMUGS1015 Xylaria sp. + - 0.00 1.60 CMUGS1017 Drumopama monoseta - - 7.96 0.00 CMUGS1018 Oxydothis sp. - - 57.54 17.14 CMUGS1021 Pyricularia sp.# ++ + 70.15 69.36 CMUGS1022 Phoma sp. 2 - ++ 67.19 50.94 CMUGS1023 Guaemannomyces graminis# ++ + 53.85 49.82 CMUGS1025 Pestalotiopsis sp. + - 55.94 37.60 CMUGS1026 Stachybotrys echinata - - 55.69 32.36 CMUGS1027 Nigrospora oryzae + - 57.23 20.00 CMUGS1029 Magnaporthe salvinii - - 69.23 50.94 CMUGS1030 Chaetosphearia lentomita - - 59.69 30.00 CMUGS1032 Curvularia lunata - - 55.67 23.81 CMUGS1033 Phomopsis sp.# ++ + 65.33 51.04 CMUGS1034 Spegazzinia deightonii - + 68.92 35.32 CMUGS1035 Fusarium oxysporum - - 62.00 50.94 CMUGS1036 Massarina phragmitocola + - 65.63 32.00 CMUGS1037 Stilbella sp. - - 7.69 1.60 CMUGS1038 Dactylaria triseptata ++ - 69.23 44.53 CMUGS1040 Cladosporium cladosporioides + - 0.00 2.13 CMUGS1041 Sporidesmium cookei - - 57.54 17.14 CMUGS1042 Dactyrella ellipsospora + + 59.10 13.33 CMUGS1055 Dactylaria dimorphospora - - 51.38 20.95 CMUGS1043 Dendrographium sp.* + - 64.62 47.50
220
Table 6.2 (Continued). Strin no. Taxa Antifungal activities tests CAa1 PAb1 CMc2 FOd2
CMUGS1044 Pleurophragmium simplex - - 45.54 22.86 CMUGS1045 Lophiosphaeria sp. - - 17.14 0.00 CMUGS1047 Pycnothyriopsis sp.* + - 58.46 1.60 CMUGS1049 Didymella sp.# + + 57.54 18.13 CMUGS1051 Dactylaria sp. - - 60.94 51.04 CMUGS1057 Lophaeostoma sp. - + 24.60 2.13 CMUGS2001 Phoma sp. 1 + - 66.79 30.83 CMUGS2006 Periconia sp. 1 - - 59.10 17.14 CMUGS2007 Coelomycete 1* - - 0.00 0.00 CMUGS2009 Dictyosporium sp. 1 - - 60.93 43.00 CMUGS2011 Massarina sp. 4* + - 57.84 23.81 CMUGS2013 Acrodictys sacchari + - 69.38 32.50 CMUGS2014 Myrothecium sp. 1 - - 59.10 29.00 CMUGS2015 Massarina sp. 2 - - 69.30 26.67 CMUGS2016 Spegazzinia tessarthra - - 61.33 45.60 CMUGS2017 Dictyosporium oblongum - - 24.61 4.00 CMUGS2022 Cercospora koepkei - - 7.67 0.63 CMUGS2024 Annulatascus sp. 1 - - 24.61 23.44 CMUGS2025 Drechslera stenospila - - 60.93 50.63 CMUGS2028 Ascomycetes* - - 53.00 18.13 CMUGS2033 Arecophila sp. 5* + - 24.61 17.14 CMUGS2034 Phialophorophoma sp. 1 - - 50.00 29.17 CMUGS2036 Fusarium sp. + + 53.67 45.60 CMUGS2037 Apiospora montagnei - - 56.56 18.13 CMUGS2039 Periconia echinochloae# + ++ 67.97 60.00 CMUGS2040 Ascomycetes - - 0.00 13.33 CMUGS2041 Dictyoarthrinium saccharii + - 65.94 49.00 CMUGS2043 Arecophila sp. 1 - - 7.67 16.19 CMUGS2044 Lophiostroma sp.2 - - 60.90 26.67 CMUGS2049 Periconia digitata + - 62.99 35.00 CMUGS2052 Ophiobolus leptosporus - - 53.00 29.00 CMUGS2060 Colletotrichum sp. 1 + + 51.33 60.00 CAa = Candida albicans PAb= Penicillium avellaneum CMc = Colletotrichum musae FMd = Fusarium oxysporum * new species/ or probably new species in this study. # highly microbial activities. ++ = clear zone more than 15 mm; + = clear zone less than 15 mm; - = no clear zone
6.3.2 Production of antibacterial and antifungal compounds by Periconia
siamensis CMUGE015 and Dactylaria endograminicola CMUGE1125
Periconia siamensis CMUGE015 and Dactylaria endograminicola
CMUGE1125 were tested for their antibacterial and antifungal activities.
Fermentation media (F1, F2, F3, F4 and F5) were examined for optimization of
growth and metabolite production by Dactylaria endograminicola CMUGE1125 and
221
Periconia siamensis CMUGE015. The result for selected fungi in fermentation media
are shown in Table 6.3 and 6.4. The suitable media for Periconia siamensis
CMUGE015 was F1 (glucose as C source, Figure 6.8, and polypeptone as N source,
Figure 6.9) and medium F2 for Dactylaria endograminicola CMUGE1125 (fructose
as C source, Figure 6.8, and soy bean meal as N source, Figure 6.9).
Table 6.3 The inhibition zone (diameter, mm) of crude extract from Periconia
siamensis against pathogenic bacteria and fungi in fermentation media F1, F2, F3, F4
and F5.
a Means of inhibition clear zones surrounding each application point, three replicates
Inhibition Zone (mm)aPathogenic organisms F1 F2 F3 F4 F5
Bacillus cereus 15.0±0.15 12.9±0.15 8.9±0.10 9.2±0.10 8.5±0.11Canida albicans 11.1±0.05 9.2±0.11 7.8±0.05 8.2±0.05 6.5±0.11Listeria monocytogenes 13.1±0.11 10.7±0.05 7.1±0.05 8.3±0.10 6.4±0.05Penicillium avellaneum 10.1±0.11 8.6±0.05 6.4±0.05 8.0±0.05 7.5±0.05Pseudomonas aeroginosa 10.1±0.11 8.4±0.05 6.8±0.05 8.1±0.10 6.8±0.05Staphylococcus aureus 14.3±0.05 10.8±0.11 7.4±0.17 8.0±0.05 7.5±0.05
Table 6.4 The Inhibition zone (diameter, mm) of crude extract from Dactylaria
endograminicola against pathogenic bacteria and fungi in fermentation media F1, F2,
F3, F4 and F5.
Inhibition Zone (mm)aPathogenic organisms F1 F2 F3 F4 F5
Bacillus cereus 12.0±0.15 14.3±0.05 9.2±0.10 8.5±0.11 8.9±0.10Canida albicans 10.1±0.11 10.1±0.11 8.3±0.10 6.4±0.05 7.8±0.05Listeria monocytogenes 11.7±0.05 13.0±0.15 8.3±0.10 7.5±0.05 7.1±0.05Penicillium avellaneum 8.6±0.05 11.7±0.05 8.0±0.05 6.8±0.05 6.4±0.05Pseudomonas aeroginosa 8.4±0.05 9.8±0.11 8.1±0.10 6.8±0.05 6.8±0.05Staphylococcus aureus 10.8±0.11 10.6±0.11 8.0±0.05 7.4±0.17 7.4±0.17
222
0
5
10
15
20
25
Lac to s e Fructo s e Malto s e Gluco s e Sucro s e Manito l
C-sources
Gro
wth
zon
e (m
m)
P. siamensisD. endograminicola
Figure 6.8 Effect of C-sources on antimicrobial agent production by Periconia
siamensis CMUGE015 and Dactylaria endograminicola CMUGE1125.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Malt extrac t Yeas textrac t
So ybeanmeal
P o ypepto ne P epto ne
N-sources
Gro
wth
zon
e (m
m)
P. siamensisD. endograminicola
Figure 6.9 Effect of N-sources on antimicrobial agent production by Periconia
siamensis CMUGE015 and Dactylaria endograminicola CMUGE1125.
223
6.3.3 The effect of pH, temperature and time on antibacterial and antifungal
production
Optimized of fermentation conditions for antibacterial and antifungal
production by Periconia siamensis CMUGE015 and Dactylaria endograminicola
CMUGE1125 were pH 6.5 (Figure 6.10) and 30°C (Figure 6.11). The widest zone of
inhibition occurred after 14 days of incubation (Figure 6.12). There no significant
difference in the inhibition between 25 and 30 °C, but at 30 °C the largest inhibition
zone was observed.
02
46
810
1214
16
5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8
pH
Gro
wth
zon
e (m
m)
P. siamensisD. endograminicola
Figure 6.10 Effect of pH on antimicrobial productions by Periconia siamensis
CMUGE015 and Dactylaria endograminicola CMUGE1125.
224
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
25 30 37 45
Temperature (°C)
Gro
wth
zon
es
P. siamensisD. endograminicola
Figure 6.11 Effect of temperature on antimicrobial productions by Periconia
siamensis CMUGE015 and Dactylaria endograminicola CMUGE1125.
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Time (days)
Gro
wth
zon
e (m
m) y
P. siamensisD. endograminicola
Figure 6.12 Effect of incubation time on antimicrobial productions by Periconia
siamensis CMUGE015 and Dactylaria endograminicola CMUGE1125.
225
6.3.4 The characterization of bioactive compounds from Periconia siamensis
CMUGE015.
6.3.4.1 Screening for antibacterial metabolite production
Preliminary tests for antibacterial activity showed that Periconia siamensis
CMUGE015 produced metabolites that are inhibitory against the growth of Bacillus
cereus, Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeroginosa
on all media. F1 medium containing a combination of carbon source (fructose) and
soybean meal (as N-source) was identified as the most effective for the production of
antibiotics active against the test bacteria (Appendix F). Data analysis using SPSS
v.10 package for one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that F1 medium
was significantly better than the other media used (Appendix G).
226
a.
b. c.
Figure 6.13 a: X-ray crystallography of compound 1, b: compound 1, c: compound.
2 (Fun et al., 2006).
6.3.4.2 Extraction and concentration
A crude extract (1500 mg) of P. siamensis CMUGE015 was subjected to silica
gel-column chromatography and 16 fractions were obtained. Each fraction was tested
for antibacterial activity. Fractions 5 and 7 were markedly effective in inhibiting the
growth of the test microorganisms in this experiment indicating that they contained
bioactive compounds. Fraction 7 (hexane:ethyl acetate = 99:1) was precipitated with
cold ethyl acetate and designated as the hyaline white, pin-shaped crystal, Compound
227
1 (120 mg). Fraction 5 was then subjected to repeated chromatography in a mixture of
hexane and ethyl acetate (6:4), and then designated Compound 2 (105 mg).
Purification of fraction 5 also resulted in other compounds (ii) (43 mg), (iii) (32 mg)
and (iv) (14 mg).
6.3.4.3 Characterization of bioactive compounds from Periconia siamensis
CMUGE015
(a)
Modiolide A
Figure 6.14 Structure of antibacterial compound from Periconia siamensis
CMUGE015. This compound is known as Modiolide A.
Compound 1 (Figure 6.14) was fractionated from fraction-7 and crystallized
from solvent system EtOAc:MeOH (99:1), identified by IR, NMR and mass spectra
data as 5,8-dihydroxy-10-methyl-5,8,9,10-tetrahydro-2H-oxecin-2-one (Modiolide A),
MW 198 and the molecular formula was shown to be C10H14O4 by HREIMS. IR
absorption bands at 3292 and 1716 cm-1 were attributed to OH and carbonyl group-
(s), respectively 1H and 13C NMR data disclosed the existence of an ester carbonyl
(äC 170.9), four sp2 methines (äC 139.4, 138.7, 131.8, and 123.7), three oxymethines
(äC 73.6, 73.0, and 70.9), one sp3 methylene (äC 44.7), and one methyl group (äC
22.4). Since three out of four unsaturations were accounted for, Compound 1 was
228
inferred to contain one ring. The 1H-1H COSY and HMQC spectra revealed
connectivities from C-2 to C-10 (Fig. 6.15). The HMBC correlation from H-2 to C-1
suggested that the ester carbonyl group was attached to C-2. The relatively lower-field
resonance of H-9 (äH 5.25) suggested that C-9 was involved in an ester linkage to C-1.
The existence of two hydroxyl groups at C-4 and C-7 was determined by a lower-field
shift of H-4 and H-7 (äH 5.44 2H, m) by esterification with p-methoxycinnamoyl
chloride (vide infra). This observation supported the presumption that the compound
was a 10-membered macrolide. Geometries of two disubstituted olefins at C-2- C-3
and C-5-C-6 were assigned as Z and E, respectively, by 1H-1H coupling constants
[J(H-2/H-3), 12.3 Hz; J(H-5/ H-6), 15.8 Hz] and the NOESY correlation for H-2/H-3.
These results are similar with the previous report of Modiolide A compound.
Modiolide A D +42° (c 0.25, MeOH); UV (MeOH) ìmax 204 nm (6400); IR (KBr)
îmax 3292 and 1716 cm-1; 1H and 13C NMR; EIMS m/z 180 (M - H2O)+ and 198
(M+); HREIMS m/z 198.0892 (M+, calcd for C10H14O4 198.0891 (Tsuda et al., 2003).
4-Chromanone, 6-hydroxy-2-methyl- (5CI)
Figure 6.15 Structure of antibacterial compound from Periconia siamensis
CMUGE015. 4-Chromanone, 6-hydroxy-2-methyl- (5CI).
229
Compound 2 (Figure 6.15) was fractionated from fraction-5, identified by IR,
NMR and mass spectra data as 4-Chromanone, 6-hydroxy-2-methyl- (5CI). The
molecular formula was revealed to be C10H10O3 (Fig. 1b) by HREIMS. MW 178 and
IR absorption bands at 3292 and 1716 cm-1. Compound 2 was a yellow, amorphous
powder: melting point 214–215 °C (MeOH); UV lmax (MeOH) nm (log ε): 256
(4·04), 324 (4·22);); UV lmax (sodium methoxide) nm: 256, 368; 1H NMR
(CD3COCD3): d8·50 (1H, s, exchangeable D2O, OH-4'), 7·14 (2H, d, J=8·5 Hz, H-2',
H-6'), 6·82 (2H, d, J=8·5 Hz, H-3', H-5'), 6·51 (1H, d, J=2·5 Hz, H-8), 6·37 (1H, d,
J=2·5 Hz, H-6), 5·80 (1H, s, H-3), 3·91 (3H, s, OMe-7), 3·53 (3H, s, OMe-5);
Δδ=δC5D5N2-δCD3COCD3 =H-2'+H-6' (+0·19), H-3'+H-5' (+0·32), H-8 (+0·11), H-6
(+0·01), H-3 (+0·38) OMe-7 (20·16), OMe-5 (20·23); IR νmax (CHCl3) cm-1: 1708,
1612, 1598, 1512, 1159, 1112, 1054, 952, 870, 860, 832; MS m/z (relative intensities):
178 [M]+ (100), 270 [M–CO]+ (82), 255 [M–MeCO]+ (29), 227 [M–43–CO]+ (15).
6.3.5 Minimum inhibitory concentration (MICs)
Modiolide A and 4-Chromanone-6-hydroxy-2-methyl-(5IC) showed
antibacterial activity against the five test bacteria used. Modiolide A was generally the
more effective of the two (Table 6.5), however, the high MIC values with S. aureus
and E.coli rule out further investigation. Both compounds were compared with
standard antibiotic, Penicillin G with Modiolide A being most similarly effective
(Table 6.5).
230
Table 6.5: Antibacterial activity (MIC μg/mL) of Modiolide A and 4-Chromanone,
6-hydroxy- 2-methyl- (5CI).
MIC (μg/mL) Microorganism Modiolide
A 4-Chromanone, 6-hydroxy- 2-methyl- (5CI)
Penicillin G
Bacillus cereus 3.12 6.25 6.25 Listeria monocytogenes 6.25 12.5 6.25 Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) 25 50 25 Pseudomonas aeroginosa 12.5
12.5 12.5 Escherichia coli 50 100 50
6.4 Discussion
6.4.1 Bioactive compounds from fungi
According to Dreyfuss and Chapela (1994), an estimated 4000 secondary
metabolites that prossess bioactive activities have been characterized from fungi. To
date, various species of Aspergillus, Fusarium and Penicillium, in particular are well
known for producing several secondary metabolites e.g. cyclosporine (Rodriguez et
al., 2006), paxilline (Fox and Howlett, 2008), 6-methylsalicylic acid (Panagiotou et
al., 2009). Fungi produce a diverse range of secondary metabolites which have no
effect on the growth of the producer strain but can be strongly inhibitory against other
microorganisms and many of these have important chemotherapeutic and other uses
(Bhadury et al., 2006; Boustie and Grube., 2007). Endophytic fungi are widely
recognized as prolific sources of bioactive secondary metabolites that might represent
useful leads in the development of new pharmaceutical agents (John et al., 1999;
Strobel et al., 1999; Brady et al., 2000; Singh et al., 2000; Yamada et al., 2002;
Bhadury et al., 2006; Misiek and Hoffmeister, 2007).
231
6.4.2 Potential of graminicolous fungi for antibacterial and antifungal
productions
The present study has shown that all of fungal isolates tested produce
antimicrobial agents and some endophytic fungi from grasses have a promising
prospect for production of useful bioactive compounds. The selected fungal strains,
Periconia siamensis CMUGE015 and Dactylaria endograminicola CMUGE1125
showed the highest activities for producing antibacterial and antifungal substances,
respectively. The compounds investigated in this study have a broad spectrum of
activity against several bacteria and fungi including B. cereus, E. coli, P. aeroginosa,
C. albicans and P. avellaneum. Strobel et al. (1999) found that cryptocandin produced
by Cryptosporiopsis quercina, a fungal endophyte from Tripterigenum wilfordii, has
antifungal activity against the human pathogens C. albicans and Trichophyton spp.
and the plant pathogens Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and Botrytis cinerea.
Cryptosporiopsis quercina also produces cryptocin, a tetramic acid with potent
activity against Pyricularia oryzae and a number of other plant pathogenic fungi (Li
et al., 2000; 2001). Cryptocin was generally ineffective against an array of human
pathogenic fungi. Nevertheless, with a minimum inhibitory concentration against P.
oryzae of 0.39 μg/ml, this compound is being examined as a natural chemical control
agent for rice blast and is being used as a model to synthesize other antifungal
compounds (Strobel et al., 2004).
Species of Periconia are known to produce secondary metabolites, including
the periconicins, which are the fusicoccane diterpenes produced by an endophytic
232
species isolated from the inner bark of Taxus cuspidate (Kim et al., 2002). In this
study Periconia siamensis, also found as endophyte produced antibacterial activities.
A discussion of the characterization of bioactive compounds from this fungus will be
presented in section 6.4.4.
6.4.3 Effect of pH, fermentation media and temperature of antibacterial and
antifungal productions
The initial pH of the culture medium is one factor which influences production
of antibacterial and antifungal activities (Te Dorsthorst, 2004). In this study, a pH of
6.0–7.0 and temperature of 25–30°C were optimal for the production of bioactive
compounds produced by the selected fungal strains. This pH is generally in the range
for optimal fungal growth. Krier et al. (1998) also reported the effect of temperature
and pH on the production of two bacteriocins by Leuconostoc mesentriodes and the
optimal temperature was 20–25°C and pH between 5.5–6.5. They found that
temperature and pH had a strong effect on the production of these agents, which are
stimulated by slow growing rates.
The carbon and nitrogen sources used in a fermentation medium can have a
significant effect on the expression of secondary metabolite biosynthetic pathways. In
this study, glucose and fructose were used as the C-sources and polypeptone and
soybean meal were used as N-sources. C and N sources showed the highest repression
of synthesis, while Cheeptham et al. (1999) found that a mixture of glucose and
glycerol presented the high repressive effects and the mixture of yeast and
polypeptones also showed the highest repression. Sucrose may be an excellent of C-
source for antifungal production in fermentation of producing strain, while glucose
233
only promoted growth for producing strains. Peptone is good as the N-source, it is
more nutrition complex than soybean meal. This study supported the results from
earlier work with C-sources, however, for N-sources soybean meal and polypeptone
presented the highest repression than the previous report. Different fungi clearly
utilise different nutrients for their growth and production of secondary metabolites as
controlled by their genomes. The chemical nature (C and N sources), pH and
temperature also were found to have a profound influence on bioactive compounds
production in liquid culture of fungi.
6.4.4 Characterization of antibacterial activities of Periconia siamensis
CMUGE015
From this research on new biologically active metabolites from fungi two
antibacterial compounds from P. siamensis CMUGE015, an endophytic fungus from
the grass, Thysanolaena latifolia (Bhilabutra et al., in press) have been characterised.
Two antibacterial compounds were identified as Modiolide A (C10H14O4) and 4-
Chromanone-6-hydroxy-2-methyl-(5IC) (Figure 6.14 and 6.15).
Modiolide A was recently reported as a novel compound from the marine
fungus, Paraphaeosphaeria sp., however, no antibacterial activity was described
(Tsuda et al., 2003). Recently, the structure of this compound was reported using X-
ray crystallography (Fun et al., 2006) (Fig. 6.13a). In this study, it has been
demonstrated that Modiolide A has potent activity against Bacillus cereus and
Listeria monocytogenes, MRSA (Methicillin Resistance Staphylococcus aureus) and
Pseudomonas aeroginosa the causative agents of food borne disease, listeriosis, skin
234
infections and lung disease, respectively. The compound was compared with standard
antibiotic, Penicillin G. The results show that Modiolide A inhibits gram positive
bacteria rather than gram negatives (Table 6.6).
Modiolide are classified into the macrolide group, a group of drugs (typically
antibiotics) whose activity stems from the presence of a Mcrolide ring, a large
macrocyclic lactone ring to which one or more deoxy sugars, usually cladinose and
deesosamine, may be attached. The lactone rings are usually 14, 15 or 16-membered.
Macrolides belongs to the polyketide class of natural products (Shiomi and Ōmura,
2002). The mechanism of action of the macrolide is inhibition of bacterial protein
biosynthesis by binding reversibly to the subunit 50S of the bacterial ribosome,
thereby inhibiting translocation of peptidyl tRNA. This action is mainly
bacteriostatics, but can also be bactericidal in high concentration (Keicho and Kudoh,
2002; Schultz, 2004).
Compound 2 (Fig. 6.15) or 4-Chromanone-6-hydroxy-2-methyl-(5IC) is
similar to Tuckolide (C10H16O5, compound in Lactones group, Figure 6.16) that has
been reported as an inhibitor of cholesterol synthesis in liver cells (Andrus and Shih,
1996). However, 4-Chromanone is compound of Flavonoids group. Flavonoids are
most commonly known for their antioxidant activity. However, it is now known that
the health benefits they provide against cancer and heart disease are the result of other
mechanisms (Cushnie and Lamb, 2005). There has never been reported as having
antibacterial activities. It showed a similar spectrum of activity as Modiolide A and 4-
Chromanone-6-hydroxy-2-methyl-(5IC), however, the latter was more potent and
could have potential as a lead compound for the development of antibacterial agents
for many gram positive bacterial strains.
235
Figure 6.16 Structure of Tuckolide (C10H16O5), similar compound of 4-Chromanone,
6-hydroxy-2-methyl- (5CI).