Chapter 6

47
Organization Structure and Design Chapter 6

description

Chapter 6. Organization Structure and Design. Learning Objectives. After studying this chapter, you should be able to: Identify the basic elements of organizations. Describe the bureaucratic perspective on organization design. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Chapter 6

Page 1: Chapter 6

Organization Structure and

Design

Chapter 6

Page 2: Chapter 6

Learning Objectives

After studying this chapter, you should be able to:

1. Identify the basic elements of organizations.2. Describe the bureaucratic perspective on

organization design.3. Identify and explain several situational

influences on organization design.4. Describe the basic forms of organization

design that characterize many organizations.5. Describe emerging issues in organization

design.

Page 3: Chapter 6

Chapter Outline The Basic Elements of Organizing

Job Specialization Alternatives to Specialization Grouping Jobs: Departmentalization Establishing Reporting Relationships Distributing Authority Coordinating Activities

The Bureaucratic Model of Organization Design

Situational Influences on Organization Design Core Technology Environment Organization Size and Life Cycle

Page 4: Chapter 6

Chapter Outline (cont’d)

Basic Forms of Organization Design Functional (U-Form) Design Conglomerate (H-Form) Design Divisional (M-Form) Design Matrix Design Hybrid Design

Emerging Issues in Organization Design The Team Organization The Virtual Organization The Learning Organization

Page 5: Chapter 6

The Basic Elements of Organizing

Organization Structure and Design The overall set of structural elements that

can be used to configure the total organization.

A means to implement strategies and plans to achieve organizational goals.

Job Specialization The degree to which the overall task of the

organization is broken down and divided into smaller component parts.

Page 6: Chapter 6

Job Specialization

Benefits of Specialization Workers can become proficient at a task. Transfer time between tasks is decreased. Specialized equipment can be more easily

developed. Employee replacement becomes easier.

Limitations of Specialization Employee boredom and dissatisfaction with

mundane tasks. Anticipated benefits of specialization do not

always occur.

Page 7: Chapter 6

Alternatives to Specialization

Job Rotation Systematically moving employees from one job

to another. Most frequent use today is as a training device for skills and flexibility.

Job Enlargement An increase in the total number of tasks

performed. Increases training costs, unions want workers

paid more pay for doing more tasks, and work may still be dull and routine.

Job Enrichment Increasing both the number of tasks the worker

does and the control the worker has over the job.

Page 8: Chapter 6

Alternatives to Specialization (cont’d)

Job Characteristics Approach: Core Dimensions

Skill variety—the number of tasks a person does in a job.

Task identity—the extent to which the worker does a complete or identifiable portion of the total job.

Task significance—the perceived importance of the task.

Autonomy—the degree of control the worker has over how the work is performed.

Feedback— the extent to which the worker knows how well the job is being performed.

Growth-Need Strength The desire of some people to grow, develop, and

expand their capabilities that is their response to the core dimensions.

Page 9: Chapter 6

The JobCharacteristics Approach

Page 10: Chapter 6

Alternatives to Specialization (cont’d)

Work Team An alternative to job specialization

that allows the entire group to design the work system it will use to perform an interrelated set of tasks.

Page 11: Chapter 6

Grouping Jobs: Departmentalization

Departmentalization The process of grouping jobs

according to some logical arrangement.

Rationale for Departmentalization Organizational growth exceeds

the owner-manager’s capacity to personally supervise all of the organization.

Additional managers are employed and assigned specific employees to supervise.

Page 12: Chapter 6

Functional Departmentalization

Advantages Each department can

be staffed by functional-area experts.

Supervision is facilitated in that managers only need be familiar with a narrow set of skills.

Coordination inside each department is easier.

Disadvantages Decision making becomes

slow and bureaucratic. Employees narrow their

focus to the department and lose sight of organizational goals/ issues.

Accountability and performance are difficult to monitor.

The grouping of jobs involving the same or similar activities

Page 13: Chapter 6

Product Departmentalization

Advantages All activities associated

with one product can be integrated and coordinated.

Speed and effectiveness of decision making are enhanced.

Performance of individual products or product groups can be assessed.

Disadvantages Managers may focus

on their product to the exclusion of the rest of the organization.

Administrative costs may increase due to each department having its own functional-area experts.

The grouping of activities around products or product groups

Page 14: Chapter 6

Location Departmentalization

Advantage Enables the organization to

respond easily to unique customer and environmental characteristics.

Disadvantage Large administrative staff may

be needed to keep track of units in scattered locations.

The grouping of jobs on the basis of defined geographic sites or areas.

Page 15: Chapter 6

Establishing ReportingRelationships

Chain of Command A clear and distinct line of authority

among the positions in an organization.

Unity of Command Each person within an

organization must have a clear reporting relationship to one and only one boss.

Scalar Principle A clear and unbroken line of

authority must extend from the lowest to the highest of the organization.

Page 16: Chapter 6

Establishing ReportingRelationships (cont’d)

Span of Management (or Span of Control) The number of people who report to a

particular manager. There is no ideal or optimal span of

management.

Page 17: Chapter 6

Establishing Reporting Relationships:

Tall Versus Flat Organizations

Tall Organizations Are more expensive

because of the number of managers involved.

Foster more communication problems because of the number of people through whom information must pass.

Flat Organizations Lead to higher levels of

employee morale and productivity.

Create more administrative responsibility for the relatively few managers.

Create more supervisory responsibility for managers due to wider spans of control.

Page 18: Chapter 6

Distributing Authority

Authority Power that has been legitimized by the

organization. Delegation

The process by which managers assign a portion of their total workload to others.

Reasons for Delegation To enable the manager to get more work done

by utilizing the skills and talents of subordinates. To foster the development of subordinates by

having them participate in decision making and problem solving.

Page 19: Chapter 6

Decentralization andCentralization

Decentralization The process of systematically

delegating power and authority throughout the organization to middle and lower level managers.

Centralization The process of systematically

retaining power and authority in the hands of higher-level managers.

Page 20: Chapter 6

Decentralization andCentralization (cont’d)

Factors Determining the Choice of Centralization The complexity and

uncertainty of the external environment.

The history of the organization.

The nature (cost and risk) of the decisions to be made.

Page 21: Chapter 6

Coordinating Activities Coordination

The process of linking the activities of the various departments of the organization.

The Need for Coordination Departments and work groups are

interdependent; the greater the interdependence, the greater the need for coordination.

Page 22: Chapter 6

Coordinating Activities:Three Major Forms of

Interdependence

Pooled interdependence When units operate

with little interaction; their output is simply pooled at the organizational level.

Sequential interdependence When the output of

one unit becomes the input of another unit in sequential fashion.

Reciprocal interdependence When activities

flow both ways between units.

Page 23: Chapter 6

Structural Coordination Techniques

The Managerial Hierarchy Placing one manager in charge of

interdependent departments or units. Routine Coordination

Coordinating activities via rules and procedures that set priorities and guidelines for actions.

Liaison Roles A manager coordinates interdependent

units by acting as a common point of contact, facilitating the flow of information.

Page 24: Chapter 6

Structural CoordinationTechniques (cont’d)

Task Forces Used with multiple units when coordination is

complex (requiring more than one individual) and the need for coordination is acute.

Are disbanded when the need for coordination has been met.

Integrating Departments Permanent organizational units that maintain

internal integration and coordination on an ongoing basis.

May have authority and budgetary controls.

Page 25: Chapter 6

Electronic Coordination Techniques

Electronic Information Technology E-mail and instant messaging Electronic scheduling to coordinate

arrangements for group meetings Local networks structured around a

common web-based communication system

Video-conferencing Wireless networks

Page 26: Chapter 6

The Bureaucratic Modelof Organization Design

Bureaucratic Model (Max Weber) A logical, rational, and efficient organization design

based on a legitimate and formal system of authority.

Characteristics1. A division of labor with each position filled by an expert2. A consistent set of rules to ensure uniformity in task

performance3. A hierarchy of positions, which creates a chain of

command4. Impersonal management with appropriate social distance

between superiors and subordinates5. Employment and advancement based on technical

expertise and employees protected from arbitrary dismissal

Page 27: Chapter 6

Bureaucratic Model

Advantages Efficiency in function

due to well-defined practices and procedures.

Organizational rules prevent favoritism.

Recognition of and requirement for expertise stresses the value of employees.

Disadvantages Inflexibility and

rigidity due to rules and procedures.

Neglects the social and human processes within the organization.

“One best way” of organization design does not apply to all organizations.

Page 28: Chapter 6

Situational Influenceson Organization Design

Core Technology Technology is the conversion process used to

transform inputs into outputs. A core technology is an organization’s most

important technology. Joan Woodward initially sought a correlation

between organization size and design; instead she found a potential relationship between technology and design.

As the complexity of technology increases, so do the number of levels of management.

Page 29: Chapter 6

Situational Influenceson Organization Design (cont’d)

Woodward’s Basic Forms of Technology Unit or Small-Batch Technology

Produce custom-made products to customer specifications, or else produce in small quantities.

Large Batch/Mass Production Uses assembly-line production methods to

manufacture large quantities of products. Continuous Process

Use continuous-flow processes to convert raw materials by process or machine into finished products.

Page 30: Chapter 6

Situational Influenceson Organization Design (cont’d)

Woodward’s Findings Unit or small-batch technology and

continuous process firms tend to be organic—less rigid and more informal.

Large batch/mass production firms tend to be mechanistic—bureaucratic with higher degrees of labor specialization.

Organizational success was related to the extent to which organizations followed the typical pattern appropriate to their technology.

Page 31: Chapter 6

Situational Influenceson Organization Design (cont’d)

Burns and Stalker Research focused on identifying extreme forms of

the organizational environment: Stable environments that remain constant over

time. Unstable environments subject to uncertainty

and rapid change. Organization Designs

Mechanistic organizations, similar to bureaucratic models, are found most frequently in stable environments.

Organic organizations are flexible and informal models that are usually found in unstable and unpredictable environments.

Page 32: Chapter 6

Situational Influenceson Organization Design (cont’d)

Lawrence and Lorsch Predicted that environmental factors have

differential effects on the different units of an organization; affecting the overall design of the organization.

Differentiation, the extent to which an organization is broken down into subunits, is associated with stable environments.

Integration is the degree to which the various subunits must work together in a coordinated fashion.

The degree of differentiation and integration needed by an organization depends on the stability of the environments that its subunits face.

Page 33: Chapter 6

Situational Influenceson Organization Design (cont’d)

Organizational Size Defined as the total number of full-time or full-

time equivalent employees. Research findings:

Small firms tend to focus on their core technology.

Large firms have more job specialization, standard operating procedures, more rules and regulations, and are more decentralized.

Organizational Life Cycle A progression through which organizations

evolveas they grow and mature—birth, youth, midlife, and maturity.

Page 34: Chapter 6

Basic Forms of Organization Design

Functional or U-form (Unitary) Design Organizational members and units are

grouped into functional departments, such as marketing and production.

Requires coordination across all departments.

Resembles functional departmentalization in its advantages and disadvantages.

Promotes a narrowing functional rather than broader organizational focus

Tends to promote centralization Is common in smaller organizations

Page 35: Chapter 6

Functional (U-Form) Design for a Small Manufacturing

Company

Page 36: Chapter 6

Basic Forms ofOrganization Design (cont’d)

Conglomerate or H-form (Holding) Design Organization consists of a set of unrelated

businesses with a general manager for each business.

Holding-company design is similar to product departmentalization.

Coordination is based on the allocation of resources across companies in the portfolio.

Design has produced only average to weak financial performance; has been abandoned for other approaches.

Page 37: Chapter 6

Conglomerate (H-Form) Design at Samsung

Page 38: Chapter 6

Basic Forms ofOrganization Design (cont’d)

Divisional or M-form (Multidivisional) Design An organizational arrangement based on

multiple businesses in related areas operating within a larger organizational framework; following a strategy of related diversification.

Activities are decentralized down to the divisional level; others are centralized at the corporate level.

The largest advantages of the M-form design are the opportunities for coordination and sharing of resources.

Page 39: Chapter 6

Multidivisional (M-form) Design at Limited Brands

Successful M-form organizations can outperform U-form and H-form organizations.

Page 40: Chapter 6

Basic Forms ofOrganization Design (cont’d)

Matrix Design An organizational arrangement based on two

overlapping bases of departmentalization. A set of product groups or temporary

departments are superimposed across the functional departments.

Employees in the matrix become members of both their departments and a project team under a project manager.

The matrix creates a multiple command structure in which an employee reports to both departmental and project managers.

Page 41: Chapter 6

Basic Forms ofOrganization Design (cont’d)

Matrix design is useful when: There is strong environmental

pressure. There are large amounts of

information to be processed. There is pressure for shared

resources.

Page 42: Chapter 6

A Matrix Organization

Page 43: Chapter 6

Basic Forms ofOrganization Design (cont’d)

Matrix Design Advantages Enhances organizational flexibility. Involvement creates high motivation and

increased organizational commitment. Team members have the opportunity to learn

new skills. Provides an efficient way for the organization

to use its human resources. Team members serve as bridges to their

departments for the team. Useful as a vehicle for decentralization.

Page 44: Chapter 6

Basic Forms ofOrganization Design (cont’d)

Matrix Design Disadvantages Employees are uncertain about reporting

relationships. Managers may view design as an anarchy in

which they have unlimited freedom. The dynamics of group behavior may lead to

slower decision making, one-person domination, compromise decisions, or a loss of focus.

More time may be required for coordinating task-related activities.

Page 45: Chapter 6

Basic Forms ofOrganization Design (cont’d)

Hybrid Designs An organizational arrangement based on two

or more common forms of organization design. An organization may have a mixture of related

divisions and a single unrelated division. Most organizations use a modified form of

organization design that permits them to have sufficient flexibility to make adjustments for strategic purposes.

Page 46: Chapter 6

Emerging Issues inOrganization Design

The Team Organization An approach to organizational design that relies

almost exclusively on project-type teams with little or no underlying functional hierarchy.

The Virtual Organization An organizational design that has little or no

format structure with few permanent employees, leased facilities, and outsourced basic support services.

It may conduct its business entirely on-line and exist only to meet a specific and present need.

Page 47: Chapter 6

Emerging Issues inOrganization Design (cont’d)

The Learning Organization An organization that works to facilitate the

lifelong learning and development of its employees while transforming itself to respond to changing demands and needs.

Goals Improved quality Continuous improvement Performance measurement