Chapter 3 Preferences. Assumptions about Preferences Complete--Compare two bundles, A and B. There...
-
Upload
susanna-nelson -
Category
Documents
-
view
224 -
download
2
Transcript of Chapter 3 Preferences. Assumptions about Preferences Complete--Compare two bundles, A and B. There...
Assumptions about Preferences
• Complete--Compare two bundles, A and B. There are three possibilities: A is preferred; B is preferred; they are indifferent
• Reflexive--Any bundle is as good as itself, I.e., A>=A. (note: ”>“ represents “is preferred” and “=“ represents “indifferent”.
• Transitive-- If A>=B and B>=C, then A>=C.
• Strict Convexity (needed only for well-defined preferences)-- If A>=z and B>=z, then a*A+(1-a)*B> z. This assumption is equivalent to a diminishing MRS. The assumption is ad hoc.
No Crossing Between Two Indifferent Curves
• X is indifferent to Z (X=Z) and Y is indifferent to Z (Y=Z) [Note: = means “indifferent,” not “equal”]
• Hence, X=Y=Z. However, X lies below the steeper indifferent curve, meaning that X is inferior to Y--- a contradiction.
Some Special Preferences
• Goods are perfect substitutes: U=ax+by [ex: U($1, $10) or U(yellow pencil, red pencil)]
• Goods are perfect complements: U=min[ax, by] [ex: U(coffee, sugar)]
• Y is a neutral good: U=x [ex: U(LeftShoe, .) for person only with the left foot; U(anchovies, pepperoni) ]
• U(good, bad) [ex: U(apple, durian) ]
• Satiated preference
• Discrete goods
MRS
• Defined as the rate at which the consumer is willing to substitute one good for the other
• It diminishes as more x is consumed if strict convexity holds.