CHAPTER 3 MATERIALS AND METHODS - …shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/29620/8/08...76...
Transcript of CHAPTER 3 MATERIALS AND METHODS - …shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/29620/8/08...76...
76
CHAPTER 3
MATERIALS AND METHODS
3.1 INTRODUCTION
This Chapter is concerned with material and methods used in the
study. For assessment of different yarn and fabric characteristics, mostly
standard methods were used.
3.2 MATERIALS
Microfibres of viscose, modal, lyocell, and blends of these fibres
with cotton were used. Details of fibre properties are given in Table 3.1.
Table 3.1 Details of materials used
Type of fiber Fibre fineness (dtex)
Length (mm)
Tenacity (cN/tex) Elongation (%)
Micromodal 1.0 34 33 15 Normal modal 1.3 34 35 13 Microlyocell 0.9 34 35 14 Micro viscose 0.9 38 22 21 Normal viscose 1.3 38 25 20 Micro polyester 0.9 38 54 19 Normal polyester 1.3 38 61 14 Cotton 3.9 29 22 7 Micro polyester filament 83/136 - 40 32 Normal nylon filament 85/68 - 38 40 Lycra filament 83/34 - 10 600
3.3 METHODS
Microfibres were processed in semi-high production and high-
production cards for optimization of process parameters, and yarn samples
were produced in ring, compact and rotor spinning systems to study the
77
structural and mechanical properties. Knitted fabric samples were made from
the yarns to evaluate physical, mechanical and comfort properties. The
experiments were designed to study the effect of carding variables on the
sliver quality and yarn characteristics produced from various spinning
technologies.
3.4 EXPERIMENTAL PLAN
Figure 3.1 shows the experimental plan for production of yarns.
Figure 3.1 Experimental plan
# - 20Ne(29.52 tex) micromodal yarn was produced from ring spinning (35TpcmTex0.5/112αm) and rotor spinning (35TpcmTex0.5 /112αm & 39 TpcmTex0.5 /124αm )for studying yarn structure namely fibre migration and mechanical properties. ^ - 50Ne(11.81 tex) micromodal and microlyocell yarn samples from ring and compact spinning were produced at 3 different twist levels (32, 35, 39 TpcmTex0.5 / 100,110,125αm) for studying handle and mechanical properties. A total of 120 cops of yarn samples were produced for ring and compact systems of spinning (10 cops/twist level/fibre/system) for the study. *- Weft knitted single jersey fabrics were produced from 30Ne(19.68 tex) micro modal/PET yarns and 25Ne (23.62 tex) viscose yarn, dyed and tested for fabric properties.
78
Figure 3.2 Process flow chart of ring and compact spinning for
microfibre
Tables 3.2 - 3.10 give details of the machines, process parameters
for carding, spinning and knitting used for the study.
79
Table 3.2 Details of spinning machines used
Process Machines
Blow room
Mixing bale opener
Scutcher with krischner beater
Carding
Drawframe
Speedframe
Ring frame
Compact spinning
Trumac
Trumac
Trumac
Lakshmi Rieter C-1/3
Rieter-RSB851
Lakshmi LF1440
Lakshmi Rieter G5/1
Suessen EliTe
Table 3.3 Details of Carding process parameters
Parameter SHP HP
Lap hank (Ne) 0.0017 0.0020
Card sliver hank (Ne) 0.155,0.170,0.185 0.18 , 0.20 , 0.22
Licker- in speed (rpm) 550 940
Cylinder speed (rpm) 260 360
Doffer speed (mpm) 12.8,16,19.2 120,140,160
Flat speed (mm/min) 50.8,101.6,152.4 254,304.8,355.6
80
Table 3.4 Details of Cardwire details
Cylinder wire ECC* Height- 2.0mm Rib- 0.65 Angle – 63 deg 760 PPSI
Doffer wire ICC* Height- 4.0mm Rib- 0.80 Angle - 55 deg 322 PPSI
Tops ICC Height- 8.0mm Angle - 75 deg 348 PPSI
Licker - in ICC Height- 5.5 mm Angle - 80 deg 5 TPI
* ECC – English Card Clothing, ICC – Indian Card Clothing
Table 3.5 Details of process variable and its code
Run Code
Doffer Speed (m/min)
X1
Delivery hank Ne (ktex)
X2
Flat Speed (mm/min)
X3
SHP HP SHP HP SHP HP
1 19.2 120 0.155(3.8) 0.18(3.28) 152.4 254
0 16 140 0.17(3.47) 0.20(2.95) 101.6 304.8
-1 12.8 160 0.185(3.19) 0.22(2.68) 50.8 355.6
Table 3.6 Details of Spinning process parameter (Micromodal)
Ring spinning Count 20 Ne/29.5 tex
Rotor spinning Count 20Ne/29.5 tex
Machine Make : Trytex
Ring yarn twist factor : 3.7αe /112αm Spindle speed (rpm) : 13,500/16000 Break draft : 1.3 Traveller : 6/0
Machine Make :BD-SD ELITEX
Rotor-ET yarn twist factor :3.7αe /112αm Rotor-HT yarn twist factor : 4.1αe /124αm
Rotor dia.(mm) : 42 Rotor speed (rpm) : 71,580
Opening roller speed (rpm) : 8100
Rotor-ET = Rotor- Equal Twist Rotor-HT = Rotor-High Twist
81
Table 3.7 Details of spinning process parameters
Process Particulars
Ring and Compact 50Ne(11.8tex)
Ring and Compact
50Ne (11.8tex) Ring 25Ne (23.6tex)
Ring 25Ne (23.6tex)
Ring 30Ne (19.68 tex)
Type of fibre Micromodal Microlyocell Micro/regular
polyester Micro/regular
viscose Micromodal
Machine make LR G5/1(Ring)
SuessenELiTe(Compact)
LR G5/1(Ring)
SuessenELiTe(Compact
LR G5/1(Ring)
LR G5/1(Ring)
LR G5/1
TpcmTex0.5 / αm
32, 35, 39 / 100,110,125 32, 35, 39 / 100,110,125
30/94 30/94 30/94
Spindle speed 18000 18000 15000 15000 16000
Traveller 6/0 6/0 5/0 5/0 5/0
Table 3.8 Details of knitting machine used
Type of Fabric Single Jersey
Machine Name BMW
Machine Speed 28 rpm Gauge 24 Cylinder Diameter 14 No. of Feeders 18 Total no. of feeders 108 0 Needle type Groz-Beckert
Table 3.9 Socks knitting machine details
Name of Machine Lonati socks knitting machine
(Double Cylinder)
Gauge 14
Number of needles 168
Number of feeders 8
Speed (rpm) 180
82
Table 3.10 Details of arrangement of yarns in feeders
Feeders Socks-A Socks-B
F1 Lycra Lycra
F2 E E
F3 E E
F4 Cotton/Nylon MicroModal/MicroPET(F)
F5 E E
F6 Nylon MicroPET(F)
F8 Cotton Micromodal
3.5 TESTING OF FIBRES, YARN AND FABRICS
3.5.1 Testing of Single Fibres
The following properties of fibres were studied:
1. Fibre fineness
2. Fibre strength
3. Fibre elongation
Fiber denier and single fiber tenacity and elongation were evaluated
using an instrument developed by Lenzing based on Bureau International pour
la Standardization Fibres Artificielles, (BISFA) 1998 and ASTM D-3822-01
standards. Sample size was 50 grams and twenty readings were taken.
3.5.2 Testing of Card Sliver
The following properties were evaluated for card sliver.
1. Effective length (Baer sorter)
83
2. Mean length(Baer sorter)
3. Short fibre content(Baer sorter)
4. Neps(Manual neps/gram)
5. Strength (Stelometer)
6. Elongation(Stelometer)
7. Evenness (Uster)
8. Cutting/combing ratio
9. Orientation index
10. Sliver cohesion(Instron)
(AFIS used for correlation of values from baer sorter in SHP
cards only).
For evaluating the output sliver quality parameters such as effective
length, mean length, short fibre content both AFIS and bear sorter method
were used for SHP cards.
3.5.3 Manual Testing
For estimation of the mean length and short fibre content, baer
sorter was used. In this method of length measurement, we can evaluate
different length groups of fibres both visually and numerically. The basic
procedure used in comb sorters is implemented to construct the comb sorter
diagrams from which the fibre length parameters are estimated.
Advanced Fibre Information System (AFIS) is based on
aeromechanical fibre processing followed by electro optical sensing and then
by high speed micro processor based computing and data reporting. The fibres
penetrate a collimated beam of light and scatter and block the light in
proportion to their optical diameter and direct relation to their time of flight
through the sampling volume. From the wave forms which are micro seconds
84
in deviation, the pertinent data are acquired, analyzed and stored in the host
computer for interpretation.
The AFIS Nep classification module counts and sizes seed coat
neps. The Classification module is able to identify the distinct electrical wave
forms produced by fibres, fibre clumps and seed coat neps etc. It uses digital
signal processor to classify all incoming wave forms and calculate nep size.
Table 3.11 gives details of card sliver tests.
Table 3.11 Details of tests conducted for card sliver
Parameters Measured
Instrument Sample Size No. of test done
Mean length (mm) Short fibre content %, Neps per gram.
Uster AFIS Multidata Module(Only for SHP cards)
0.450 g per Sample
4 readings per sample
Mean length (mm) Short fibre content in %.
Baer sorter 2 samples of 15mg each
Average of values from 2 patterns per sample
Neps per gram. Manual Counting 5 samples of 1 g each
Average of values from 5 counting’s
Strength and elongation
Stelometer 15 5 readings/sample
Evenness Uster tester-4 15 10 readings/sample
Fibre orientation in sliver
Lindsley’s method 2 2 readings/sample
Sliver cohesion Instron ASTM D 2654
15 5 readings/sample
85
3.5.4 Fibre Configuration in Card Sliver
The term “fibre arrangement “ is applied to a combination of
factors such as the parallelization of the fibre along the sliver axis, the degree
of fibre straightness and the presence of curved or hooked fibre. In the present
study an apparatus was designed on the principle outlined by Lindsley (1951)
and the method utilized to measure fibre orientation consisted of the
following operations: The sliver specimen was given a marking to indicate the
direction in which it was delivered by the machine since this affects the
results. The sliver was then clamped between the three plates A, B and C
which rests on three blocks. The widths of the plates A, B and C being ½”, 1”
and 1/2” respectively. The sliver was cut at the edge C1 with a sharp blade.
The plate C was removed and the sliver was combed well. The combed
portion of the fibres was weighed. The plate C was then replaced to reclamp
the combed sliver fringe. The fiber portion extending beyond the edge C1 was
cut and weighed. The plate C was removed and the remaining trapped
material was cut at C2 and weighed on an accurate balance. The same
procedure was repeated for the reverse direction also. The subscripts ‘f’ and
‘r’ denote the forward and reverse direction of combing respectively. The
following notations were used for the measurement of orientation in this study:
C = weight of combed out fibres
E = weight of fibre ends projecting over the line of cut after
combing, and
N = Weight of sliver portion clamped under the cutting plate
after combing.
Lindsley (1951) used two coefficients viz. the “combing ratio”
which is equal to C/E+N and the “orientation index” which is equal to
(1-E/N) × 100 for evaluation of the results.
86
3.6 TESTING OF YARNS
The following properties of yarn were studied.
1) Yarn tenacity
2) Yarn elongation
3) Imperfections
4) Hairiness
5) Yarn structure (fibre migration)
6) Yarn abrasion
7) Yarn friction
8) Yarn compression
9) Yarn bending
10) Yarn wicking
11) Yarn surface (SEM)
The yarns were tested for tenacity, elongation, evenness,
imperfections and hairiness using Uster Tensorapid and Uster Evenness
Tester (UT-4). Yarn hairiness was measured using Zweigle hairiness tester.
Here the S3 value (index) was used for the analysis. The packing density was
calculated from yarn specific volume using the following formula:
Specific Volume (cm3/g) = 78570 × d2 /Tex (3.1)
where, d is the yarn diameter in cm and Tex is the yarn linear density.
Table 3.12 gives with the various testing methods employed to
study the properties of yarn.
87
Table 3.12 Details of yarn characteristic tests
S. No.
Yarn Characteristic test
used Instrument used
Test method/Procedure
Sample size
Numberof test done
1 Yarn evenness, imperfection and hairiness index-H(cm/cm)
Uster UT-4 ASTM-D-1425-96 10cops 10
2 Single thread tenacity and breaking elongation
Uster tensorapid ASTM D 2256 Uster standard method-CRE-5m/min
10 cops 20 test/cop 200 readings
3 Hairiness Frequency and index(Zweigle)
Zweigle G566 ASTM-D-5647-01 10 cops 10
4 Fibre migration study
SUMKA-Microscope with CCD camera
Tracer fibre technique
10 tracer fibres
30-45 readings/tracer fibre
5 Yarn diameter & overall density
Uster-UT4-OM module
Uster standard method
5 cops 1 test/cop
Total 5 cops
6 Yarn packing coefficient
Projectina microscope
Inhouse test 10 cops 10 test/cop 100 readings
7 Yarn wicking test In house arrangement
In house test 2 cops 6 readings/cop
8 Yarn friction test Lawson-Hemphill constant tension transport-dynamic tension tester
10 cops 10
9 Yarn abrasion test SITRA-MAG yarn abrasion tester.
10 cops 10
10 Yarn compression test
KES-F compression module
12 cops 5 test/cop
11 Yarn bending Loop method 12
12 Yarn surface characteristics
Scanning Electron Microscope
88
3.6.1 Tenacity
All tensile measurements namely tenacity, elongation were
measured using Uster Tensojet. 20 readings/cop/sample totalling 200 readings
from 10 cops were taken per sample. All tests were done according to ASTM
D 2256.
3.6.2 Evenness Tests
The yarn evenness measurements were carried out on the Uster
evenness Tester (UT-4). This is based on the capacitance principle. The
measurements were carried out under standard atmospheric conditions, i.e., a
relative humidity of 65 2% and a temperature of 25oC 2oC. The samples
were left overnight in this environment to be fully conditioned. They were
also measured for imperfections at standard and high sensitivity levels. The
diameter and packing density of the yarns were also evaluated. Yarn hairiness
index given by the instrument was also recorded. 10 readings/samples were
taken for assessment. All the tests were done according to ASTM-D-1425-96.
3.6.3 Yarn Hairiness Test
The yarn hairiness was measured using Zweigle yarn hairiness
tester (Zweigle G565 hairiness tester instrument manual). The hairiness of a
yarn characterizes the number of projecting and freely moving fiber ends or
fiber loops. The number of projecting fibres per length unit is assessed. The
measurement technique used by this instrument is based on the photoelectric
principle. The projecting fibres interrupt a light beam and bring about an
alteration in the light density. Photo- transistors register these light density
levels at varying distances and supply test data accordingly. In order to count
the number of hairs over several length zones at the same time, the yarn is
scanned by twelve photo-transistors. Here, the length of fibre protruding from
89
one side of the yarn is recorded as shown in the figure. The hairs of length 3
mm and above were measured in the research work. A length of 100
m/sample was carried out for assessing the hairiness of yarns. All the tests
were done according to ASTM-D-5647-01.
3.6.4 Yarn to Metal Friction
The constant tension transport-dynamic tension tester (CTT-DTT)
was used to measure the yarn to metal friction. In this instrument,
manufactured by Lawson-Hemphill (Lawson-Hemphill constant tension
transport-dynamic tension tester (CTT-DTT), instrument manual) the
co-efficient of friction is measured by passing the yarn specimen through two
metal pins in the yarn path as shown in figure.
Then, the co-efficient of friction is calculated using the formula
µ = ln (To/T1) (3.2) 4p (n-0.5) sin β/2
where µ = Co-efficient of friction ln = Natural log
To = Output Tension T1= Input Tension
β = lower apex angle between two yarns n =number of wraps.
Ten tests were carried out for assessing the friction co-efficient of
yarns. The total test length of yarn for the 10 tests is 1000m.
3.6.5 Flexural Rigidity
Flexural rigidity was determined by the loop test based on
Carlene’s (1950) method. The mean of five tests was taken. In this method,
the yarn is made in the form of a loop, and it is distorted by adding a rider.
90
Flexural rigidity is calculated from the following formula,
Flexural rigidity (g.cm2) = kWL2 cos θ / tan θ (3.3)
where k is a constant the value of which is around 0.0047
W = applied load in grams
L = circumferential length of in distorted ring in cm
θ = 493d/L
d = deflection of lower end of the ring under action of
applied load.
For greater sensitivity, a value of W is chosen such that θ lies
between 40º and 50º. When W is in grams, L and d are in cm, the filament
rigidity is derived in units of g.cm2 and has the dimensions ML3T-2.
Figure 3.3 Flexural rigidity by ring loop method
Yarn loops of 1.6cm diameter were prepared with the help of a
circular glass tube of known diameter and by putting the reef knot for joining
both ends of yarn. The tube of mounted horizontally on a stand and a stripe of
black paper was introduced into the tube so as to provide an opaque
background for better visibility of loop. The glass tube surface was covered
91
with then cellophane sheet wrapped around the glass tube to allow convenient
withdrawal of the loops. This way the circular loops were obtained. A special
care was taken to keep the same tension while putting the reef knot for
preparing the yarn loops. For avoiding the effects of bulk it was desired to
keep the knot at 45o with the vertical in each test. 30 readings were taken for
each sample and the mean was considered. The specific flexural rigidity was
calculated using the formula given below.
Specific flexural rigidity = (couple/curvature)/Lineardensity2 mN, mm2/ Tex
3.6.6 Yarn Compression Properties
Yarn compression property was measured using Kawabata tester.
For compression tests a single yarn was placed on the bottom of the plate of
the instrument and a plunger of 2 cm2 were used to compress the sample at a
constant rate. The following parameter which represents compression
properties, namely LC, WC, RC and EMC % were obtained.
Standard procedures were followed as per the instructions given on
manuals. Parameters of compression are given in Table 3.13.
Table 3.13 Parameters of compression
Parameters Description Unit
Lateral compression
LC - Linearity of compression thickness curve
WC - Compressional energy RC - Compressional resilience
- J/m2 %
92
3.6.7 Standardisation of Number of Test for Sample
The number of test to get minimum CV in the estimate of
compression of a single yarn was conducting 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 tests each
time. Table 3.14 shows the levels of CV for different number of test.
Table 3.14 Varying number of tests for compressional energy of yarns
Sl.No Number of tests (N) Coefficient of variation (CV%)
1 5 4.2 2 10 3.68 3 15 3.64 4 20 3.6 5 25 3.4 6 30 3.1
It is clear from the above that coefficient of variation more or less
stabilizes at N = 10 and after wards the improvement in CV is relatively less
with higher number of readings.
Hence 15 tests per sample were carried out for assessing the
compression of yarns.
3.6.8 Fibre Migration
3.6.8.1 Migration studies on microfibre yarns
Towards characterizing the structure of microfibre yarns from ring
and rotor spinning systems, a fibre migration study has been carried out using
tracer fibre technique and microscope with the CCD camera. The
characterization of tracer fibre has been carried out as per Hearle (1965), Huh
(2002) and Primentas (2001).
93
In order to investigate fibre migration, dyed cotton fibres were
blended with undyed fibres. These fibres accounted for 0.5% of weight of
undyed fibres and served as tracer fibres, during the structural analysis of ring
and rotor spun yarns. After opening and carding, the materials were subjected
to two passages of drawing, and then taken to the rotor spinner. A small
proportion i.e. 1.0% by weight of above fibres were green dyed and used as
tracer fibres, which were introduced in the carding stage with the remaining
un-dyed material.. The yarn counts 20 Ne (29.5 tex) were selected for the
study. The tracer fibre incorporated sliver was used in rotor spindles to
produce ring and rotor yarns.
The standard tracer-fibre technique was used for the study .The
yarn thus produced using tracer fibres is immersed in liquid medium (methyl
salicylate) having substantially the same refractive index as that of cotton
fibres concerned. Some times the white fibres may no be dissolved optically.
It is because; the refractive index of white fibres and methyl salicylate is
different hence benzaldehyde was mixed with methyl salicylate to match the
refractive index of white fibres and the solution. The yarn was examined
under a microscope; the un-coloured fibres disappeared from view leaving the
path of each tracer-coloured fibre to be clearly visible. The tracer was seen
against the faint background of yarn body as the wavy line representing the
projection in one plane of helix. The present study was confined to the use of
projection microscope.
3.6.8.2 Configuration of tracer fibre
Parameters such as mean fibre position (Y), RMS deviation (D),
migration intensity (I), equivalent migration frequency defined by Hearle
(1965) and migration factor defined by Huh (2002) were used for
characterising migration behaviour of the tracer fibre under microscope.
94
3.6.8.3 Mean fibre position
Represents overall tendency of a fibre to be near the surface (or)
near the Centre of yarn and calculated from
z
0
Y1Y YdZz n
(3.4)
where R = Yarn radius
Z = Length along yarn
n = Number of observation
where 2rY
R
r = helix radius
3.6.8.4 Amplitude of migration
The magnitude of deviations from mean position represented by
Root Mean Square Deviation (D).
3.6.8.5 RMS deviation
½½ 2z
2
0
(Y Y)1D (Y Y) dzz n
(3.5)
3.6.8.6 Rate of migration (migration intensity)
This is rate of change of radial position. For this mean migration
intensity is used:
½ ½2 2z
0
1 dY dYI dzz dZ dZ
(3.6)
95
The modified form the above formula is
½2Y1 Y2L1I
n
(3.7)
when L1 was the distance between adjacent indications Y1 and Y2.
3.6.8.7 Equivalent migration frequency
I4D 3
(3.8)
For a ideal migration cycle constructed from calculated value of
I and D.
3.6.8.8 Migration factor
Migration factor is derived as:
MF = RMS deviation × migration intensity (3.9)
3.6.8.9 Measurements
Measurements a, b, c and d were made at successive peak and
trough of a tracer fibre image.
Diameter of yarn in scale units is c-a.
Off set of trough / peak from yarn axis given by
(a c)b2
Distance between adjacent trough / peak is ‘d’.
96
In order to avoid effects due to change in yarn diameter radial
position of fibres is given by a ratio.
Figure 3.4 Tracer diagram
a c br 2
a cR2
(3.10)
Plot of r/R against length along yarn shows cylindrical
envelope of varying radius around which fibres is following a
helical path as shown in Figure 3.4.
3.6.9 Packing Fraction
Packing fraction was calculated from the following formula
Packing fraction = Volume of fibre / volume of yarn
= Vf / Vy (3.11)
ff
lV
(where f is the density of fibres)
5 2
y10 dV (cc / g)
4Tex
(3.12)
97
where d2 is the yarn diameter in cm.
Therefore packing fraction =
= 5 2
Tex 410 d
(3.13)
3.6.10 Abrasion Resistance
Yarn abrasion resistance was measured by using SITRA-MAG yarn
abrasion tester. In this, a cylinder, which has an oscillating motion, is covered
with the standard emery paper. The yarn specimens held under constant
tensions by weights are pressed against the cylinder under constant pressure
until they break. At the end of every abrading cycle, the cylinder turns slightly
so as to present a clean abrasive surface. The number of strokes required to
break for each yarn is recorded.
A computerized control unit takes care of the complete working of
the tester, once the yarn samples are mounted. It records the number of cycles
required to rupture the yarn individually, and those records can be used for
future applications.
The comparison between the results obtained on different types of
yarns is simplified by the calculation of a “Relative Resistance Index” (RRI)
as given by the following formula:
Mean Resistance (Cycles) x Pretension (cN/tex) RRI = (3.14) (Total Count (Tex)) 1/2
3.6.11 Yarn Wicking
An in-house test method was used to measure the wicking of water
in to the yarn samples. The water transport rate is determined by a vertical
98
strip wicking test in which the time in seconds required for the water to reach
a height of 5 cms is measured at intervals of 1 cm.
3.6.12 Scanning Electron Microscope
The ZEISS EVO 50 is a versatile analytical microscope with a
large specimen chamber. The EVO 50 series can handle large specimens at
the analytical working distance of 8.5 mm owing to a combination of the
inclined detectors and the sharp conical objective lens.
Table 3.15 Specifications of Scanning Electron Microscope
Model ZEISS EVO 50
Resolution 2.0 nm@ 30 kV(SE with LaB6 option)
Acceleration Voltage 0.2 to 30 kV
Magnification 5 x 1,000,000x
Field of View 6 mm at the Analytical Working Distance (AWD)
Image processing Resolution: Upto 3072 x 2304 pixel signal acquisition by integrating and averaging.
Image Display Single flicker-free XVGA monitor with SEM image displayed at 1024 x 768 pixel
Sample Requirements for SEM
General Size: Any dimension (Height or Diameter): Less than
10mm. Conductivity (Electrical): Conducting or atleast semi conducting. If
sample is not electrically conducting, it will require silver or gold coating.
Sample preparation
1. Keep the size of the samples to about 5 to 8 mm.
99
2. Samples have to be mounted on a circular metallic sample
holder.
3. The samples have to be fixed on to the sample holder rigidly
by using colloidal silver paste or sticky carbon tape.
4. Samples must be arranged in a circular pattern.
5. Since an electron beam is incident on the sample for SEM
analysis, it is essential that the samples are electrically
conducting. If not, the samples have to be coated with 20 to
50 nm thick gold or silver. The SEM is equipped with
BIO-RAD POLARAN sputter coater for this purpose.
3.7 TESTING OF KNITTED FABRICS
Knitted fabrics produced from normal and microfibres were tested
for the following properties.
1. Geometrical properties
2. Dimensional stability
3. Drape
4. Spirality
5. Abrasion resistance
6. Bursting strength
7. Pilling resistance
8. Fabric friction (Instron tensile tester)
9. Fabric hand (Kawabata hand evaluation system)
10. Wicking (in house tester)
11. Moisture vapour transmission (MVTR)
12. Air permeability
13. Surface characterization (scanning electron microscope)
100
The fabric was tested according to standard test procedures which
are shown in Table 3.16.
Table 3.16 Standards of test methods for fabrics
Sl. No.
Test Instrument Standard Sample
size No. of test done
1. CPI, WPI & Stitch density
Pick counting glass IS: 1963: 1981 2 10 readings/sample
2. Dimensional changes
IS: 1963: 1981 2 10 readings/sample
3. Arial density ISO 3801:1983 2 10 readings/sample
4. Fabric drape Drape meter BS 8357 2 10 readings/sample
5. Fabric thickness Thickness gauge IS 7702:1975 2 10 readings/sample
6. Spirality Spirality tester AATCC : 179: 2004
2 10 readings/sample
7. Bursting strength BS 4768 30 mm
2 10 readings/sample
8. Water drop test AATCC : 79: 2000
2 10 readings/sample
9. Abrasion resistance
Martindale abrasion tester
ASTM 4966: 1998
2 10 readings/sample
10. Pilling resistance MAG Pilling tester ASTM D 4970: 2002
2 10 readings/sample
11 Air permeability SDL Atlas air permeability tester
ASTM D 737 2 10 readings/sample
12 MVTR SDL Atlas MVTR ASTM E 96 2 10 readings/sample
11 Fabric friction
Sliding friction apparatus- Model 5569
_ 2 10 readings/sample
12 Surface charecterization
SEM using Japan Electron Optics Limited
_ 2 _
13 Fabric handle
KES-F-Tensile, Shear, Bending Friction
_ 2 4 readings/sample
on each property tested
101
3.7.1 Measurement of Fabric Parameters
Courses/cm and wales/cm were counted with counting glass. By
making 1 cm perpendicular to the wales and pulling out the yarns, the number
of courses can be counted. Ten measurements for each dimension were made
at different places on each side of the tubular fabrics. Mean values of
courses/cm and wales/cm were then calculated.
3.7.2 Loop length
In order to find out actual loop length of the knitted fabrics at both
dry and fully relaxed states, the side knitted first of each sample was levelled
out and a cut of approximately 5 cm was carefully made parallel to wale
direction in this tubular form of the fabrics. Six courses were then unroved
from each sample and measured for their lengths on Shirley crimp tester
under pre-determined tensions i.e., 0.1 g/tex.
The mean value course length was calculated and thereafter divided
by the number of needles yielding the loop length. The actual loop length at
both dry and fully relaxed states and the corresponding measured values of
yarn linear densities were used to calculate the actual tightness factor
according to the following formula.
Tightness factor = √tex / l (3.15)
where l = loop length. 10 readings were recorded for each sample.
3.7.3 Determination of Stitch Density, Kc, Kw, Ks, Kc/ Kw and Course
and Wale Spacing
The value of stitch density (S) was calculated by multiplying the
corresponding mean values of courses and wales/cm which were found out as
102
explained earlier. The geometrical parameters of the corresponding knitted
samples at both dry and fully relaxed states were calculated according to the
formulae.
Kc = CPC × l (3.16)
Kw = WPC × l (3.17)
Ks = Kc × Kw (3.18)
The loop shape factor of the knitted fabric i.e. the ratio of courses
per cm by the wales /cm. was calculated.
3.7.4 Fabric Thickness (t)
The fabric thickness parameter (t) was measured on “Essdiel”
thickness gauge using the minimum possible load of 20 gf/cm2 which is
equivalent to a pressure of 1.96 kN/m2 (1.96 KPa). Choice of this pressure
was also governed by Postle’s (1971) paper on compression curves for cotton
single jersey fabrics, which shows that around a pressure of 2KPa flattening
of the protruding fibres as well as buckles in the fabric takes place.
The tubular form of the knitted fabrics was cut along the wale line,
and then spread carefully without strain on the gauge tester and then tested for
its thickness. Ten readings at different places of each sample were taken to
calculate the average value of the respective sample thickness.
103
3.7.5 Relaxation Treatment
3.7.5.1 Dry relaxation
All the knitted fabrics were laid free from any constraint on a flat
surface and allowed to condition for at least 72 hours in a standard
atmosphere. The desired fabric parameters were then measured and recorded.
3.7.5.2 Full relaxation
The fabrics were washed and tumble dried for 5 times following the
steps suggested by STARFISH project undertaken by the International
Institute of Cotton (IIC), Manchester, UK. The steps involved are given below:
a) Washing in domestic washing machine at 60◦C.
b) Tumble dry until the fabric is dried.
c) Wet-out in washing machine.
d) Repeat steps b and c three times.
e) Condition the sample.
All the knitted fabrics, whether treated or untreated were subjected
to the above treatments to bring them to the stable state before they are taken
up for testing.
3.7.6 Wicking
Wicking tests were carried out on fully relaxed samples. The
fabrics were laid on a flat horizontal surface for at least 24 hours in the
standard atmosphere; the wrinkles were removed without stretching. Strips
(40 × 350 mm) parallel to the wale direction were cut from the samples. All
the samples were marked at intervals of 1 cm along their length using a pen to
make the movement of the water through the fabric more easily measured. A
104
pin weighing 1 gm was then inserted through the lower edge of strip to weigh
it to ensure that the end dipped in water. Then the strip was suspended
vertically in the wale direction with one end of the threads clamped into the
clamping bar. The other weighted end dipped 5 mm into the reservoir of water
by using the height adjusted. Each sample was hung freely. Thus the end of
each specimen is put in water (all samples were at the same level). The height
of water that wicked through the fabric at different period of time was
recorded. For each type of sample tests were repeated three times according to
a random sampling order to further reduce any experimental errors due to
slight change in the testing environment, distilled water was used for the
experiment.
3.7.7 Surface Characterisation of Knitted Fabrics
3.7.7.1 Scanning Electron Microscope
A Jeol [Japan Electron Optics Limited] 1989 Model scanning
electron microscope was used to investigate the surface structure of the fabric
knitted from microfiber vis-à-vis normal denier fiber. Samples were sputter
coated with gold and investigated at a magnification level of 100x.
3.7.8 Fabric Friction
The sliding friction apparatus as shown in Figure 3.7 was used to
quantify the smoothness of knitted fabrics using the refined friction
factor, ”R.”
A constant rate of elongation tensile tester (Instron Model 5569)
with the friction adaptation as shown in Figure 3.5 was used to obtain both
static and kinetic friction force values at six different applied loads.
105
Figure 3.5 Sliding friction apparatus
3.7.9 Drape Co-efficient
Drape co-efficient of fabrics was measured using Drape Meter
(Drape Co-efficient: BS8357: 1973). A fabric which will deform when it is
allowed to hang under its own weight is defined as fabric drape. A circular
specimen of about 30 cm diameter is supported on a circular disk of about
12.5 cm diameter and the unsupported area drapes over the edge as shown in
figure. If the specimen were, say, a 30 cm gramophone record, no draping
would occur and the area of projection from the periphery would equal the
area of record. With fabrics the material will assume some folded
configuration and the shape of the projected area will not be circular but
something like the shape as shown in the figure.
Drape co-efficient, F is determined by considering areas, Let
AD = the area of the specimen
Ad = the area of the supporting disk and
As = the actual projected area of the specimen
106
F is the ratio of the projected area of the draped specimen to its
undraped area, after deduction of the area of the supporting disc.
As - Ad F = (3.19) AD – Ad
10 tests per sample were carried out for assessing the drape
co-efficient of fabrics.
3.7.10 Low Stress Mechanical Properties – Kawabata Evaluation
System for Fabrics
Objective measurement of fabrics replacing subjective
measurement is becoming more accepted as the Kawabata’s evaluation
system of measuring handle of fabrics is more popularly used. Professor
Kawabata developed the KES-FB system mainly for measurement of fabric
hand value in the 1970s. It was also designed to measure basic mechanical
properties of non-woven, papers and other film like materials. The purpose of
developing the KES-FB system was to replace the traditional subjective
method of evaluating fabric hand. The KES-FB system consists of four
instruments to measure the following properties.
KES-FB 1 for Tensile and Shearing
KES-FB 2 for Bending
KES-FB for Compression
KES-FB for Surface Friction and Roughness
and weft direction respectively. The KES-FB system consists of four
instrument blocks as shown in the following Table 3.17.
107
Table 3.17 Mechanical properties measured on KES-F
Block Property Description Unit Sample size Tensile Lt
Wt RT EMT
Linearity of stress-strain curve Tensile energy Tensile resilience Strain at 50gf/cm stress
None gf.cm/cm2
% %
5 × 20cm
Bending
B 2HB
Bending stiffness Hysterisis of bending moment
gf.cm2/cm gf.cm/cm
1 × 20 cm
Shear G 2HG 2HG5
Shear stiffness Hysteresis of shear stress at 0.5◦ Hysterisis of shear stress at 5◦
gf/cm/deg gf/cm gf/cm
5 × 20 cm
Compression LC WC RC T0
Tm
Linearity of stress/thickness curve Compression energy Compression resilience Thickness at 0.5 gf/cm2 stress Thickness at 50 gf/cm2 stress
None gf.cm/cm2
% mm mm
Surface MIU MMD SMD
Coefficient of friction Mean deviation of MIU Geometrical roughness
None None micron
20 × 20cm
Weight W Weight mg/cm2
108
Mahar (1988) says that characteristics such as stiffness, smoothness,
softness, warmth/coolness, crispness, fullness and drape and descriptive of a
fabric. Handle is related to a series of instrumental measurements based on
fundamental physical properties of a fabric, namely bending length, flexural
rigidity of bending modulus, thickness, compressibility and compression
modulus, density, extensibility and co-efficient of surface friction.
3.7.10.1 Tensile properties
The principle of the instrument is to apply a constant tensile force
to fabric in one direction and to measure the amount of stretch on the fabric.
The stretching deformation can be considered as a kind of biaxial tensile
deformation. The sample is held by two chucks (A and B), chuck B is on a
movable drum connected to a torque detector. The fabric sample is clamped
between chucks A and B and the distance between the chucks is 5cm. A
torque meter is used to measure the tensile stress and by sensing the
movement of chuck B, a potentiometer is used to measure the tensile strain.
Stretching the sample when the tensile force reaches the preset value, it turns
back and recovers to the beginning position. There are two tensile rate
adjustments as 0.2mm/sec or 0.1mm/sec. This is done by changing the gears
at the back of the instrument. The mechanical properties of fabrics under a
tensile and shear stress are very important characteristics. In the tensile testing,
the deformation is a kind of biaxial tensile deformation. To obtain a hand
evaluation objectively, this unit is designed to measure the following:
WT = Tensile Energy
RT = Resilience
LT = Linearity
EMT = Tensile Strain
109
Tensile Energy (WT)
WT is the tensile energy or the work done by the extension upto the
maximum force.
Tensile resilience (RT)
RT is the tensile resilience, which can be described as
RT = WT’/WT × 100
where WT’ is the recovered work.
Tensile Linearity (LT)
LT is the linearity of the stress strain curve which can be given as
LT = (WT /WL) × 100 (3.20)
where WT is the tensile energy required for the extension from zero strain to
the maximum strain and WL is the tensile energy when the load extension
curve is linear to zero strain at EMT.
Elongation (EMT)
EMT is the strain at the upper limit The tensile force used was 500 gf / cm
3.7.10.2 Bending Properties
Bending property is an important feature to evaluate fabrics. It is
necessary to assess fabric handle as well as fabric drape. Pure bending test is a
component of the KES-FB system. It is used to determine fabric bending
rigidity. Before the invention of the KES-FB pure bending test, Peirie’s
110
cantilever method was used to measure bending rigidity. The pure bending
tester can be used to measure the bending property of thin film materials such
as leather, rubber, film and yarn as well as fabrics (manual bending). Bending rigidity (B) is related to handle and drape.
Bending hysteresis (2HB)
This gives the frictional component of fabrics.
3.7.10.3 Shear Properties
The shear testing using the KES-FB-1 a constant force is applied to
the fabric by attaching a weight to the fabric end on clutch A side. By turning
the clutch off, chuck B is freed and able to move. When the test starts, chuck
B constantly slides to the side until there are 8 degrees of shear angle
(standard condition) and chuck B returns to the original position. During the
test, shear force is detected by a transducer and shear strain is detected by a
potentiometer.
Shear rigidity (G)
This is directly related to the draping quality of the fabrics, which
show the comfort aspects.
Hysteresis of the shear force (2HG)
This is the measure of the hysteresis of shear force on the shear
hysteresis curve at 0.5 degree shear.
111
Hysteresis of the shear force (2HG5)
This is the measure of the hysteresis of shear force on the shear
hysteresis curve at 5 degree shear.
Residual shear angle (RS)
It is the rate of 2HG/G and 2HG5/G.
3.7.10.4 Surface properties
The surface test is also necessary to evaluate fabrics. The surface
properties are closely related to the fabric hand, its effect on fabric drape is
not that significant. The KES-FB-4 measures the frictional coefficient
(MIU),the mean deviation of the co-efficient of friction (MMD) and
geometrical roughness (SMD), the measurement is automated and the data
processing is computerized so, data can be read directly after the test. The
parameters obtained are coefficient of friction mean deviation in the frictional
force and geometric roughness. This instrument measures frictional force
generated when the fabric is moved under a metallic friction head. In its
second mode of operation, it measures the vertical movement of probe under
a 10 gf load as it moves over the surface of the fabric.
3.7.10.5 Compression properties
Compressional property of fabrics is another mechanical property
of fabric that is necessary to evaluate fabrics. The KES-FB-3 is a component
of the KES-FB series and is used for measuring the compressional property of
fabrics as well as other materials such as non-woven, leather, rubber and film.
One advantage of the instrument is, it can test fabrics with non-linear
compressional property. This is made possible by the installation of an
integral circuit. It also can be used to measure the bending properties of a
loop-shaped fabric and yarn. The sample should be under the upper-limit
112
force and constant rate of compressional deformation. This is a part of the
KES-F series to measure the compressional properties of materials, which is
closely related to the hand-feeling of fabrics. This instrument measures the
compressional deformation property of fabrics with high accuracy and
sensitivity. A constant rate of compressional deformation upto the upper limit
force and its recovery process was applied to the sample.
Compressional work (WC)
This is the work done in compressing the unit area of the fabric.
Compressional resilience (RC)
This is the resilience of the material in compression. It is the ratio
of work of decompression to work of compression, which can be given as
RC (percent) = WC’ /WC × 100 (3.21)
where WC’ is the work of decompression (J/m2) WC is the work of compression (J/m2)
This indicates the hardness of the material.
3.7.11 Air Permeability
Air permeability can be defined as the rate of air flow under a
differential pressure between the two fabric surfaces.
3.7.11.1 Measurement of air-permeability
Air at standard atmosphere is drawn from the laboratory through
the test specimen by means of a suction pump, the rate of flow being
controlled by means of the bypass valve and a series valve. The rate of flow is
adjusted until the required pressure drop across the fabric is indicated on a
113
draught gauge, graduated from 0 to 25 mm head of water. When the required
pressure drop which is normally 1 cm of water, is attained and the indicator of
draught gauge is steady, the rate of flow of air is read off one of the four
Rotameters, selected according to the permeability of the test specimen. The
test area is 5.07 cm2, since a 1 inch diameter circle is exposed when the
specimen is clamped in the holder. From the readings on the Rotameter either
the air permeability or resistance can be computed. The average rate of flow
from five specimens is calculated and by dividing this by 5.07 the air
permeability of the fabric can be obtained in cubic centimeters per second at 1
cm head of water.
3.7.12 Measurement of Moisture Vapour Permeability
The moisture vapour permeability of fabrics is an important
property for those used in clothing systems intended to be worn during
vigorous activity. The human body cools itself by sweat production and
evaporation during periods of high activity. The clothing must be able to
remove this moisture in order to maintain comfort and reduce the degradation
of thermal insulation caused by moisture build-up. This is an important factor
in cold environments. The main materials of interest are those fabrics that
incorporate a polymer layer that makes the fabric waterproof but which still
allows some water vapour to pass through. There are two main types of these
materials; those that contain pores through which the moisture vapour can
pass and those containing a continuous layer of hydrophilic polymer. The
mechanism of water vapour transmission through the second type is quite
different from that of the first type. In the British Standard version of this
method, the specimen under test is sealed over the open mouth of a dish
containing water and placed in the standard testing atmosphere. After a period
of time to establish equilibrium, successive weighings of the dish are made
and the rate of water vapour transfer through the specimen is calculated. The
water vapour permeability index is calculated by expressing the water vapour
114
permeability (WVP) of the fabric as a percentage of the WVP of a reference
fabric which is tested alongside the test specimen. Each dish is filled with
sufficient distilled water to give a 10 mm air gap between the water surface
and the fabric. A wire sample support is placed on each dish to keep the fabric
level. Contact adhesive is applied to the rim of the dish and the specimen,
which is 96mm in diameter is carefully placed on top with its outside surface
uppermost. The cover ring is then placed over the dish, and the gap between
cover ring and the dish is sealed with PVC tape. A dish which is covered with
the reference fabric is also set up in the same way. All the dishes are then
placed in the standard atmosphere and allowed to stand for at least 1 h to
establish equilibrium.
Measurement of warm/cool feel (qmax), where qmax is defined as the highest
heat flux observed when a hot body comes in contact with a fabric maintained
with a constant temperature. This is determined using Kawabata Thermolabo
system. Thermal conductivity was also determined.
3.8 STATISTICAL TOOL USED FOR DESIGN OF EXPERIMENT AND ANALYSIS IN CARDING
The fibres selected were fixed and the levels of process parameters
were selected based on technical constraints and statistical need.Three levels
were chosen at equivalent distance for predicting the response with a given fit of statistical equation for optimizing the quality response.
Box-Behnken (1960) model of statistical experimental design for 3
variables namely doffer speed, delivery hank and flat speed with 15
combination runs were selected and executed in the carding process for the
study. Regression analysis and ANOVA as described by Mongtomery (2007)
was done using SYSTAT and MINITAB software’s respectively. Design of
experiments with MINITAB was done as described by Mathews (2005).
115
Nested analysis of variance was carried out initially in order to find
Variation between various fibres on any quality response.
Significance effect of carding parameters within selected fibres.