Chapter 17 Externalities and the Environment © 2009 South-Western/ Cengage Learning.
-
date post
15-Jan-2016 -
Category
Documents
-
view
239 -
download
0
Transcript of Chapter 17 Externalities and the Environment © 2009 South-Western/ Cengage Learning.
![Page 1: Chapter 17 Externalities and the Environment © 2009 South-Western/ Cengage Learning.](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061612/56649d575503460f94a36212/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Chapter 17
Externalities
and the Environment
© 2009 South-Western/ Cengage Learning
![Page 2: Chapter 17 Externalities and the Environment © 2009 South-Western/ Cengage Learning.](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061612/56649d575503460f94a36212/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Externalities
• An externality is a cost or benefit associated with a transaction not borne by the decision maker– Full benefits and/or full costs not included
in market price
– Pollution • External cost
– Education• External benefit
2
![Page 3: Chapter 17 Externalities and the Environment © 2009 South-Western/ Cengage Learning.](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061612/56649d575503460f94a36212/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Optimal Level with negative externality
• External costs with fixed technology– Marginal social cost
• Marginal private cost• Marginal external cost
– Set MSC = MSB• Optimal Q* & P*
– Set MC = MB• Too much produced at too low a price
3
![Page 4: Chapter 17 Externalities and the Environment © 2009 South-Western/ Cengage Learning.](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061612/56649d575503460f94a36212/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Positive Externalities
• Education– Personal benefits– Benefits to society
• Set MSC = MSB– Optimal Q* and P*
• MC = MB– Too little consumed at too low a price
• Public policy– To increase quantity beyond private optimum
4
![Page 5: Chapter 17 Externalities and the Environment © 2009 South-Western/ Cengage Learning.](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061612/56649d575503460f94a36212/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Optimal Level with negative externality
• To achieve socially efficient production– Demand (marginal benefit) intersects
marginal social cost curve
– Government regulation• Limit production• Tax = marginal external cost
5
![Page 6: Chapter 17 Externalities and the Environment © 2009 South-Western/ Cengage Learning.](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061612/56649d575503460f94a36212/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Optimal Level with positive externality
• To achieve socially efficient production– Demand (marginal benefit) intersects
marginal social cost curve
– Government regulation• Subsidy = marginal external benefit
–Subsidize consumers–Subsidize producers
6
![Page 7: Chapter 17 Externalities and the Environment © 2009 South-Western/ Cengage Learning.](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061612/56649d575503460f94a36212/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Optimal Level of Pollution
• External costs with variable technology– Variable technology
• Reduce emissions: alter the production process
• Cleaner technology
– Production of cleaner air• Diminishing returns
– As air becomes cleaner it is harder to make cleaner still
7
![Page 8: Chapter 17 Externalities and the Environment © 2009 South-Western/ Cengage Learning.](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061612/56649d575503460f94a36212/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Optimal Level of Pollution
• Reducing greenhouse gases– Marginal social cost curve
• Marginal cost of enduring pollution• Upward-sloping
– Marginal social benefit curve• Marginal cost of reducing pollution• Downward-sloping
– Optimal level of air quality• Marginal social benefit = marginal social cost
8
![Page 9: Chapter 17 Externalities and the Environment © 2009 South-Western/ Cengage Learning.](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061612/56649d575503460f94a36212/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Optimal Level of Pollution
• Shift in marginal social cost curve– Technological breakthrough: Lower
marginal cost of cutting greenhouse gas• Downward shift of MSC curve• Lower optimal level of emissions
• Shift in marginal social benefit curve– Higher marginal benefit of reducing
emissions• Upward shift of MSB curve• Lower optimal level of emissions 9
![Page 10: Chapter 17 Externalities and the Environment © 2009 South-Western/ Cengage Learning.](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061612/56649d575503460f94a36212/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Criticisms of Economic Analysis
• Measurement problems– Cost of enduring pollution
• Not all costs are easily quantified
– Cost of removing pollution• Technological
–More easily quantified
• Who has the right to clean environment?– World does not run by economic trade-
offs alone10
![Page 11: Chapter 17 Externalities and the Environment © 2009 South-Western/ Cengage Learning.](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061612/56649d575503460f94a36212/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Optimal Level of Pollution
• The Coase theorem – Problems of externalities will be resolved
efficiently through private exchange, regardless of the assignment of property rights, so long as there are no transactions costs
11
![Page 12: Chapter 17 Externalities and the Environment © 2009 South-Western/ Cengage Learning.](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061612/56649d575503460f94a36212/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Optimal Level of Pollution
• Coase Theorem– Efficient solution
• Least cost solution • Assign property right to one party• One side bears the externality cost
– Transactions costs arise• Scientific and technical uncertainties • Legal uncertainties• Costs of negotiation
12
![Page 13: Chapter 17 Externalities and the Environment © 2009 South-Western/ Cengage Learning.](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061612/56649d575503460f94a36212/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
How to Achieve Optimal Level of Pollution
• Command & Control– Engineering controls and pollution
ceilings• Not efficient
• Legal system– Tort law
• Difficulties arise
13
![Page 14: Chapter 17 Externalities and the Environment © 2009 South-Western/ Cengage Learning.](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061612/56649d575503460f94a36212/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
How to Achieve Optimal Level of Pollution
• Pollution Charges– Efficiency can be achieved
– How large is tax?
– Polluters have “right” to pollute
• Market for pollution rights – Government sells pollution rights
• Limits maximum level of pollution per day
– Firms buy and sell pollution permits
– Value of pollution permits fluctuates14
![Page 15: Chapter 17 Externalities and the Environment © 2009 South-Western/ Cengage Learning.](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061612/56649d575503460f94a36212/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Pollution Rights and Public Choice
• Pollution regulation– Special interest of polluters
• Before 1990– Command-and-control environmental
regulations• Particular technologies to reduce emissions
• Market for pollution rights– Economic efficiency approach
• Reduce emissions: Cost-effective15
![Page 16: Chapter 17 Externalities and the Environment © 2009 South-Western/ Cengage Learning.](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061612/56649d575503460f94a36212/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Environmental Protection
• Environmental Protection Agency EPA• Clean air act of 1970• Clean water act of 1972• Resource conservation and recovery act
of 1976• Superfund law of 1980
16
![Page 17: Chapter 17 Externalities and the Environment © 2009 South-Western/ Cengage Learning.](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061612/56649d575503460f94a36212/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Air Pollution
• Atmosphere– Economic resource
– People value clean air; willing to pay more
• Smog– 40% from automobile emissions
– 40% from consumer products
– 15% from manufacturing
17
![Page 18: Chapter 17 Externalities and the Environment © 2009 South-Western/ Cengage Learning.](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061612/56649d575503460f94a36212/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Air Pollution
• Clean air act of 1970– 90% reduction in auto emissions
– By 1990, average emissions fell• Lead: 97%• Monoxide: 41%• Sulfur dioxide: 25%
• U.S. air quality: good• U.S. – major source of fossil-fuel carbon
dioxide emissions18
![Page 19: Chapter 17 Externalities and the Environment © 2009 South-Western/ Cengage Learning.](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061612/56649d575503460f94a36212/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Water Pollution
• Sources– Sewage
– Chemicals
• Sewage– Dumped into waterways; no cleaning
• Negative externality
– Federal money: treatment plants
19
![Page 20: Chapter 17 Externalities and the Environment © 2009 South-Western/ Cengage Learning.](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061612/56649d575503460f94a36212/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Water Pollution
• Chemicals– 10% from point pollution
• Factories, industrial sites
– Two thirds – from nonpoint pollution• Agricultural pesticides and fertilizers
– In most states: pesticides have fouled some groundwater
20
![Page 21: Chapter 17 Externalities and the Environment © 2009 South-Western/ Cengage Learning.](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061612/56649d575503460f94a36212/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Hazardous Waste and the Superfund
• Before 1980– Firms
• Pay others to haul and dispose• Not responsible for cleaning
• Superfund law of 1980– Companies
• Pay others to haul and dispose• Pay for clean up
21
![Page 22: Chapter 17 Externalities and the Environment © 2009 South-Western/ Cengage Learning.](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061612/56649d575503460f94a36212/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Solid Waste:”Paper or Plastic?”
• U.S. households– 4 pounds of garbage per resident per day
• Mostly packaging
– 200 million tons per year
• 70% of garbage - landfills• Recycled: 15% of garbage
– 75% paper products
• 15% - incinerated – Trash-to-energy plants 22
![Page 23: Chapter 17 Externalities and the Environment © 2009 South-Western/ Cengage Learning.](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061612/56649d575503460f94a36212/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Solid Waste:”Paper or Plastic?”
• 2 out of 3 aluminum cans: recycled• Returnable deposit laws
– Increase recycling
• Recycling: imposes environmental costs– Curbside recycling
• Trucks
– Newsprint• De-inked
23