CHAPTER 13 The Organization of International Business.
-
date post
22-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
304 -
download
4
Transcript of CHAPTER 13 The Organization of International Business.
CHAPTER 13
The Organization of International
Business
Learning Objectives
Define and identify different forms of the organizational architecture that international businesses use to manage their global operationsExplore the various components of the architectureDescribe the control systems and integrating mechanism available to multinational firmsDiscuss the advantages and disadvantages of centralized versus decentralized decision systemsLook at ways to match architecture and competitive strategy to achieve high performance
IBUS 330 Dr. Nini Yang
Organizational Architecture and Profitability
Organizational architecture is the totality of a firm’s organization, including
StructureControl systems and incentivesProcessesCulturePeople
Superior enterprise profitability requires three conditions:
An organization’s architecture must be internally consistent.Strategy and architecture must be consistent.Strategy, architecture and competitive environments must be consistent.
IBUS 330 Dr. Nini Yang
Organization Architecture
Structure
People
Culture
ProcessesControls & Incentives
Figure 13.1
IBUS 330 Dr. Nini Yang
Organization Architecture
Control systems:Metrics used to measure subunit performanceMake judgments about managers’ abilities to run unitsIncentives are devices to reward appropriate managerial behavior.
Processes:Manner in which decisions are madeManner in which work is performedConceptually distinct from location of decision-making responsibility
IBUS 330 Dr. Nini Yang
Organizational Architecture
Culture:Norms and value systems shared by the employees
People:Not just current employees, but also the strategy to recruit, compensate, and retain individuals with necessary skills, values and orientation
If a firm is going to maximize its profitability, it must pay close attention
to achieving internal consistency among the various
components of its architecture.IBUS 330 Dr. Nini Yang
Organizational Structure at Unilever
European Business Group
Detergents Frozen Food Margarine
France
Germany
Spain
Figure 13.2
Minimize component inconsistencies
through intelligent design.
IBUS 330 Dr. Nini Yang
Vertical Differentiation
Centralization:Facilitates coordinationEnsure decisions consistent with organization’s objectivesTop-level managers have means to bring about organizational changeAvoids duplication of activities
Decentralization:Give top management time to focus on critical issuesMotivational research favors decentralizationPermits greater flexibilityCan result in better decisionsCan increase control
Concerned with where decisions are made.Concerned with where decisions are made.
IBUS 330 Dr. Nini Yang
International
Centralize for core competenciesDecentralize for
operating decisions
Strategy and Centralization
Multi-domestic
Decentralize
Global
Centralize
Transnational
Both CentralizeAnd Decentralize
IBUS 330 Dr. Nini Yang
Horizontal Differentiation
How a firm divides itself into subunits
Geographicalarea
Function
Type ofbusiness
A firm must reconcile
conflict between product and
location.
IBUS 330 Dr. Nini Yang
A Typical Functional Structure
Figure 13.3
Purchasing Manufacturing Marketing Finance
TopManagement
Buying units
Plants Branch sales units
Accountingunits
IBUS 330 Dr. Nini Yang
The Functional Structure
Typically, the structureevolves in a company’s
early stage.
Coordination and control rests with top management.
IBUS 330 Dr. Nini Yang
A Typical Product Division Structure
Figure 13.4
DepartmentPurchasing
DepartmentManufacturing
DepartmentMarketing
DepartmentFinance
Buying units Plants Branchsales units
Accountingunits
Division Product line A
Headquarters
Division Product line B
Division Product line C
IBUS 330 Dr. Nini Yang
Product Division Structure
Probable next stage of international businessdevelopment. Reflects company growth into
new products.
Eases coordination and control problems.
Each unit responsible for
a product. Semi-autonomous and
accountable for its performance.
IBUS 330 Dr. Nini Yang
International Division Structure
Figure 13.5
Domestic DivisionGeneral Manager
Product Line A
International DivisionInternational DivisionGeneral ManagerGeneral Manager
Area LineArea Line
Headquarters
Domestic DivisionGeneral Manager
Product Line B
Domestic DivisionGeneral Manager
Product Line C
Country 1Country 1General ManagerGeneral Manager
(Product A, B and/or C)(Product A, B and/or C)
Country 2Country 2General ManagerGeneral Manager
(Product A, B and/or C)(Product A, B and/or C)
Functional units
Functional units
IBUS 330 Dr. Nini Yang
International Division
Widely used.Growth can
lead to worldwide structure.
Can create conflict between domestic and foreign operations.
Implied lack of coordination between domestic and foreign operations.
IBUS 330 Dr. Nini Yang
Worldwide Area Structure
Favored by firms with low degree of diversification.
Area is usually a country, and
largely autonomous.
Facilitates local responsiveness.
Encouragesfragmentation.
IBUS 330 Dr. Nini Yang
The International Structural Stages Model
Global Matrix
(“Grid”)
Area Division
Worldwide Product Division
International Division
Alternate Paths of Development
H
Foreign Product Diversity
L Foreign Sales as a Percentage of Total Sales H Figure 13.4
IBUS 330 Dr. Nini Yang
L
Worldwide Area Structure
Figure 13.5
Regional VPEurope
Regional VPMiddle East/Africa
Regional VPFar East
Headquarters
Regional VPNorth America
Regional VPLatin American
President Subsidiary
1
President Subsidiary
1
President Subsidiary
2
President Subsidiary
2
President Subsidiary
3
President Subsidiary
3
IBUS 330 Dr. Nini Yang
A Worldwide Product Division Structure
WorldwideProduct Groupor Division A
Worldwide Product Group or Division C
Headquarters
Worldwide Product Group or Division B
Area 1(domestic)
Area 2(international)
Functional unitsFigure 13.6
Functional units
IBUS 330 Dr. Nini Yang
Product Division
Reasonably diversified
firms.Attempts to overcome international division and worldwide area structural problems.
Believe that product value
creation activities should be coordinated
worldwide.
Weak local responsiveness.
IBUS 330 Dr. Nini Yang
A Global Matrix Structure
Figure 13.7
HeadquartersHeadquarters
Area 1Area 1 Area 2Area 2 Area 3Area 3
Product Product Division ADivision A
Product Product Division BDivision B
Product Product Division CDivision C
Manager herebelongs to Division Band Area 2
IBUS 330 Dr. Nini Yang
May not work as well as theory predicts.
Matrix Structure
Attempts to meetneeds of
transnational strategy.
Conflict and power struggles.
“Flexible” matrix structures.
IBUS 330 Dr. Nini Yang
Integrating Mechanisms
Need for Coordination:
Impediments:Different managerial orientations, e.g.
Labor relations Legal conditions Cultural environment
Differing goalsTime zones, distance, nationalityLow
High
Multidomestic
International
Global
Transnational
IBUS 330 Dr. Nini Yang
Formal Integrating Mechanisms
Increasing complexity of integrating mechanism
Direct contact
Liaison roles
Teams
Matrix structures
Figure 13.8
Low
High
IBUS 330 Dr. Nini Yang
A Simple Management Network
Figure 13.9
GB
C D
A F
E
Informal contacts between managers within an enterprise.
Informal contacts between managers within an enterprise.
IBUS 330 Dr. Nini Yang
Control Systems and Incentives
Types of controls:
PersonalBureaucraticOutputCultural
Incentives:Depends on employee and his/her tasks.Can be used to improve managerial coordination between units.Need to account for national differences in institutions and culture.Beware of the rule of unintended consequences.
IBUS 330 Dr. Nini Yang
Performance Ambiguity
It is a function of the interdependence
among subunits.
MultinationalOutput/Bureaucratic Global/Transnational
Cultural
Control Systems
IBUS 330 Dr. Nini Yang
Interdependence, Performance Ambiguity, and the Costs of Control for the Four International Business
Strategies
StrategyStrategy Inter-dependence
PerformanceAmbiguity
Costs ofControl
Multi-Multi-domesticdomestic
Low Low
InternationalInternational Moderate Moderate
GlobalGlobal High High
TransnationalTransnational
Low
Moderate
High
Very high Very high Very high
Table 13.1
IBUS 330 Dr. Nini Yang
Processes
The manner in which decisions are made and work is performed within an organization
Cut across national boundaries as well as organizational boundariesCan be developed anywhere within the firm’s global operations network
IBUS 330 Dr. Nini Yang
Organizational CultureValues and norms shared among peopleSources:
Founders and important leadersNational social cultureHistory of the enterpriseDecisions that result in high performance
Cultural maintenance:Hiring and promotional practicesReward strategiesSocialization processesCommunication strategy
IBUS 330 Dr. Nini Yang
Organizational Culture and Performance
A “strong” culture:
Not always goodSometimes beneficial, sometimes notContext is important
Adaptive cultures
Culture must match an organization’s architecture.Culture does not necessarily translate across borders.
Cu
lture
Transnational
Multidomestic
Global International
Strong
Weak
IBUS 330 Dr. Nini Yang
A Synthesis of Strategy, Structure and Control Systems
Multi-domestic International Global Transnational
Verticaldifferentiation
Decentralized Core competency;
rest decentralizedSomecentralized
Mixedcentralized anddecentralized
Horizontaldifferentiation
Worldwidearea structure
Worldwide product division
WorldwideProductdivision
Informal matrix
Need forcoordination Low Moderate High Very high
Integratingmechanisms None Few Many Very many
Performanceambiguity Low Moderate High Very high
Need forCultural controls Lo
wModerate High Very high
Structure and controls
Table 13.2
IBUS 330 Dr. Nini Yang
Organizational ChangeChange to match competitive and strategy environmentHard to change:
Existing distribution of power and influenceCurrent cultureManagers’ preconceptions about the appropriate business model or paradigmInstitutional constraints
Principles for changeUnfreeze the organizationMoving to the new stateRefreezing the organization
IBUS 330 Dr. Nini Yang
Implications
An organization’s architecture should be consistent internally and externally.The consistencies are critical to organizational performance and profitability.Organizational architecture should be flexible and adapt according to organizational strategy, growth, the external changing environment.Changes may face resistance, and managers need to learn principle methods in order to launch and implement necessary changes successfully.
IBUS 330 Dr. Nini Yang