Chapter 12 The Partial Equilibrium Competitive Model Nicholson and Snyder, Copyright ©2008 by...
-
Upload
norma-atkinson -
Category
Documents
-
view
280 -
download
13
Transcript of Chapter 12 The Partial Equilibrium Competitive Model Nicholson and Snyder, Copyright ©2008 by...
Chapter 12
The Partial Equilibrium Competitive Model
Nicholson and Snyder, Copyright ©2008 by Thomson South-Western. All rights reserved.
Market Demand
• Assume that there are only two goods (x and y)
– An individual’s demand for x is
Quantity of x demanded = x(px,py,I)
– If we use i to reflect each individual in the market, then the market demand curve is
n
iiyxi ppxX
1
),,( for demand Market I
Market Demand
• To construct the market demand curve, pX is allowed to vary while py and the income of each individual are held constant
• If each individual’s demand for x is downward sloping, the market demand curve will also be downward sloping
Market Demand
x xx
pxpxpx
x1* x2*
px*
To derive the market demand curve, we sum thequantities demanded at every price
x1
Individual 1’sdemand curve
x2
Individual 2’sdemand curve
Market demandcurve
X*
X
x1* + x2* = X*
Shifts in the Market Demand Curve
• The market demand summarizes the ceteris paribus relationship between X and px
– changes in px result in movements along the
curve (change in quantity demanded)
– changes in other determinants of the
demand for X cause the demand curve to
shift to a new position (change in demand)
Shifts in Market Demand
• Suppose that individual 1’s demand for oranges is given by
x1 = 10 – 2px + 0.1I1 + 0.5py
and individual 2’s demand is
x2 = 17 – px + 0.05I2 + 0.5py
• The market demand curve is
X = x1 + x2 = 27 – 3px + 0.1I1 + 0.05I2 + py
Shifts in Market Demand
• To graph the demand curve, we must assume values for py, I1, and I2
• If py = 4, I1 = 40, and I2 = 20, the market demand curve becomes
X = 27 – 3px + 4 + 1 + 4 = 36 – 3px
Shifts in Market Demand
• If py rises to 6, the market demand curve shifts outward to
X = 27 – 3px + 4 + 1 + 6 = 38 – 3px
– note that X and Y are substitutes
• If I1 fell to 30 while I2 rose to 30, the market
demand would shift inward to
X = 27 – 3px + 3 + 1.5 + 4 = 35.5 – 3px
– note that X is a normal good for both buyers
Generalizations
• Suppose that there are n goods (xi, i = 1,n) with prices pi, i = 1,n.
• Assume that there are m individuals in the economy
• The j th’s demand for the i th good will depend on all prices and on Ij
xij = xij(p1,…,pn, Ij)
Generalizations
• The market demand function for xi is the sum of each individual’s demand for that good
),,...,( 11
jn
m
jiji ppxX I
• The market demand function depends on the prices of all goods and the incomes and preferences of all buyers
Elasticity of Market Demand• The price elasticity of market demand is
measured by
D
DPQ Q
P
P
PPQe
),',(
,
I
• Market demand is characterized by whether demand is elastic (eQ,P < -1) or inelastic (0> eQ,P > -1)
Elasticity of Market Demand• The cross-price elasticity of market
demand is measured by
D
DPQ Q
P
P
PPQe
'
'
),',(,
I
• The income elasticity of market demand is measured by
D
DQ Q
PPQe
II
II
),',(
,
Timing of the Supply Response• In the analysis of competitive pricing, the
time period under consideration is important– very short run
• no supply response (quantity supplied is fixed)
– short run• existing firms can alter their quantity supplied, but
no new firms can enter the industry
– long run• new firms may enter an industry
Pricing in the Very Short Run
• In the very short run (or the market period), there is no supply response to changing market conditions– price acts only as a device to ration demand
• price will adjust to clear the market
– the supply curve is a vertical line
Pricing in the Very Short Run
Quantity per period
Price
S
D
Q*
P1
D’
P2
When quantity is fixed in thevery short run, price will risefrom P1 to P2 when the demandrises from D to D’
Short-Run Price Determination
• The number of firms in an industry is fixed
• These firms are able to adjust the quantity they are producing– they can do this by altering the levels of the
variable inputs they employ
Perfect Competition• A perfectly competitive industry is one
that obeys the following assumptions:– there are a large number of firms, each
producing the same homogeneous product– each firm attempts to maximize profits– each firm is a price taker
• its actions have no effect on the market price
– information is perfect– transactions are costless
Short-Run Market Supply• The quantity of output supplied to the
entire market in the short run is the sum of the quantities supplied by each firm– the amount supplied by each firm depends
on price
• The short-run market supply curve will be upward-sloping because each firm’s short-run supply curve has a positive slope
Short-Run Market Supply Curve
quantity Quantityquantity
PPP
q1A q1
B
P1
To derive the market supply curve, we sum thequantities supplied at every price
sA
Firm A’ssupply curve sB
Firm B’ssupply curve
Market supplycurve
Q1
S
q1A + q1
B = Q1
Short-Run Market Supply Function
• The short-run market supply function shows total quantity supplied by each firm to a market
n
iis wvPqwvPQ
1
),,(),,(
• Firms are assumed to face the same market price and the same prices for inputs
Short-Run Supply Elasticity
• The short-run supply elasticity describes the responsiveness of quantity supplied to changes in market price
S
SPS Q
P
P
Q
P
Qe
in change %
supplied in change %,
• Because price and quantity supplied are positively related, eS,P > 0
A Short-Run Supply Function
• Suppose that there are 100 identical firms each with the following short-run supply curve
qi (P,v,w) = 10P/3 (i = 1,2,…,100)
• This means that the market supply function is given by
3
1000
3
10100
1
100
1
PPqQ
i iis
A Short-Run Supply Function
• In this case, computation of the elasticity of supply shows that it is unit elastic
13/10003
1000),,(,
P
P
Q
P
P
wvPQe
S
SPS
Equilibrium Price Determination
• An equilibrium price is one at which quantity demanded is equal to quantity supplied– neither suppliers nor demanders have an
incentive to alter their economic decisions
• An equilibrium price (P*) solves the equation:
),*,(),'*,( wvPQPPQ SD I
Equilibrium Price Determination
• The equilibrium price depends on many exogenous factors– changes in any of these factors will likely
result in a new equilibrium price
Equilibrium Price Determination
Total output per period
Price
S
D
Q1
P1
The interaction betweenmarket demand and marketsupply determines theequilibrium price
Market Reaction to a Shift in Demand
Price
S
D
Q1
P1
Q2
P2 Equilibrium price andequilibrium quantity willboth rise
If many buyers experiencean increase in their demands,the market demand curvewill shift to the right
D’
Total output per period
Market Reaction to a Shift in Demand
PriceSMC
q1
P1
This is the short-runsupply response to anincrease in market price
q2
P2
If the market price rises, firms will increase their level of output
SAC
Output per period
Shifts in Supply and Demand Curves
• Demand curves shift because– incomes change– prices of substitutes or complements change– preferences change
• Supply curves shift because– input prices change– technology changes– number of producers change
Shifts in Supply and Demand Curves
• When either a supply curve or a demand curve shift, equilibrium price and quantity will change
• The relative magnitudes of these changes depends on the shapes of the supply and demand curves
Shifts in Supply
Q perperiod
Q perperiod
PricePriceS
S’S
S’
DD
PP
Q
P’
Q’
P’
QQ’
Elastic Demand Inelastic Demand
Small increase in price,large drop in quantity
Large increase in price,small drop in quantity
Shifts in Demand
PricePrice
S
S
D D
P P
Q
P’
Q’
P’
Q Q’
Elastic Supply Inelastic Supply
Small increase in price,large rise in quantity
Large increase in price,small rise in quantity
D’D’
Q perperiod
Q perperiod
Mathematical Model of Supply and Demand
• Suppose that the demand function is represented by
QD = D(P,)
is a parameter that shifts the demand curveD/ = D can have any sign
D/P = DP < 0
Mathematical Model of Supply and Demand
• The supply relationship can be shown as
QS = S(P,)
is a parameter that shifts the supply curve
S/ = S can have any sign
S/P = SP > 0
• Equilibrium requires that QD = QS
Mathematical Model of Supply and Demand
• To analyze the comparative statics of this model, we need to use the total differentials of the supply and demand functions:
dQD = DPdP + Dd
dQS = SPdP + Sd
• Maintenance of equilibrium requires that
dQD = dQS
Mathematical Model of Supply and Demand
• Suppose that the demand parameter () changed while remains constant
• The equilibrium condition requires that
DPdP + Dd = SPdP
PP DS
DP
• Because SP - DP > 0, P/ will have the same sign as D
Mathematical Model of Supply and Demand
• We can convert our analysis to elasticities
PDS
D
P
Pe
PPP
,
PQPS
Q
PPP ee
e
QPDSQD
e,,
,, )(
Equilibria with Constant Elasticity Functions
• Suppose the demand for automobiles is given by
32.11.0),( II
PPQD
• The supply for automobiles is
5.0400,6),(
PwPQS w
Equilibria with Constant Elasticity Functions
• If I = $20,000 and w = $25
2.111)108(),(
PPQD I
PPQS 280,1),( w
• Equilibrium occurs where P* = 9,957 and Q* = 12,745,000
Equilibria with Constant Elasticity Functions
• If I increases by 10 percent
2.112)1006.1(),(
PPQD I
PPQS 280,1),( w
• Equilibrium occurs where P* = 11,339 and Q* = 14,514,000
Equilibria with Constant Elasticity Functions
• If instead w increases to $30 per hour
PPQS 2168,1),( w
• Equilibrium occurs where P* = 10,381 and Q* = 12,125,000
2.111)108(),(
PPQD I
Long-Run Analysis• In the long run, a firm may adapt all of its
inputs to fit market conditions– profit-maximization for a price-taking firm
implies that price is equal to long-run MC
• Firms can also enter and exit an industry– perfect competition assumes that there are
no special costs of entering or exiting an industry
Long-Run Analysis• New firms will be lured into any market
where economic profits are greater than zero– the short-run industry supply curve will shift
outward– market price and profits will fall– the process will continue until economic
profits are zero
Long-Run Analysis• Existing firms will leave any industry
where economic profits are negative– the short-run industry supply curve will shift
inward– market price will rise and losses will fall– the process will continue until economic
profits are zero
Long-Run Competitive Equilibrium
• A perfectly competitive industry is in long-run equilibrium if there are no incentives for profit-maximizing firms to enter or to leave the industry– this will occur when the number of firms is
such that P = MC = AC and each firm operates at minimum AC
Long-Run Competitive Equilibrium
• We will assume that all firms in an industry have identical cost curves– no firm controls any special resources or
technology
• The equilibrium long-run position requires that each firm earn zero economic profit
Long-Run Equilibrium: Constant-Cost Case
• Assume that the entry of new firms in an industry has no effect on the cost of inputs– no matter how many firms enter or leave
an industry, a firm’s cost curves will remain unchanged
• This is referred to as a constant-cost industry
Long-Run Equilibrium: Constant-Cost Case
A Typical Firm Total MarketQuantityper period
Quantityper period
SMC MC
AC
S
D
q1
P1
Q1
This is a long-run equilibrium for this industry
P = MC = ACPrice Price
Long-Run Equilibrium: Constant-Cost Case
A Typical Firm Total Market
q1
SMC MC
AC
S
D
P1
Q1
P2
Market price rises to P2
Q2
Suppose that market demand rises to D’
D’
Price Price
Quantityper period
Quantityper period
Long-Run Equilibrium: Constant-Cost Case
A Typical Firm Total Market
q1
SMC MC
AC
S
D
P1
Q1
D’
P2
Economic profit > 0
Q2
In the short run, each firm increases output to q2
q2
Price Price
Quantityper period
Quantityper period
Long-Run Equilibrium: Constant-Cost Case
A Typical Firm Total Market
q1
SMCMC
AC
S
D
P1
Q1
D’
Economic profit will return to 0
Q3
In the long run, new firms will enter the industry
S’
PricePrice
Quantityper period
Quantityper period
Long-Run Equilibrium: Constant-Cost Case
A Typical Firm Total Market
q1
SMC MC
AC
S
D
P1
Q1
D’
Q3
S’
The long-run supply curve will be a horizontal line (infinitely elastic) at p1
LS
Price Price
Quantityper period
Quantityper period
Infinitely Elastic Long-Run Supply
• Suppose that the total cost curve for a typical firm in the bicycle industry is
C(q) = q3 – 20q2 + 100q + 8,000
• Demand for bicycles is given by
QD = 2,500 – 3P
Infinitely Elastic Long-Run Supply• To find long-run equilibrium, we must
find the minimum point on the typical firm’s average cost curve– where AC = MC
AC = q2 – 20q + 100 + 8,000/q
MC = 3q2 – 40q + 100– this occurs where q = 20
• If q = 20, AC = MC = $500– this will be the long-run equilibrium price
Shape of the Long-Run Supply Curve
• The zero-profit condition is the factor that determines the shape of the long-run cost curve– if average costs are constant as firms enter,
long-run supply will be horizontal– if average costs rise as firms enter, long-run
supply will have an upward slope– if average costs fall as firms enter, long-run
supply will be negatively sloped
Long-Run Equilibrium: Increasing-Cost Industry
• The entry of new firms may cause the average costs of all firms to rise– prices of scarce inputs may rise– new firms may impose “external” costs on
existing firms– new firms may increase the demand for
tax-financed services
Long-Run Equilibrium: Increasing-Cost Industry
A Typical Firm (before entry) Total Market
q1
SMC MC
AC
S
D
P1
Q1
Suppose that we are in long-run equilibrium in this industry
P = MC = ACPricePrice
Quantityper period
Quantityper period
Long-Run Equilibrium: Increasing-Cost Industry
A Typical Firm (before entry) Total Market
q1
SMCMC
AC
S
D
P1
Q1
Suppose that market demand rises to D’
D’
P2
Market price rises to P2 and firms increase output to q2
Q2q2
Price Price
Quantityper period
Quantityper period
Long-Run Equilibrium: Increasing-Cost Industry
A Typical Firm (after entry) Total Market
SMC’ MC’
AC’
S
D
P1
Q1
D’
q3
P3
Entry of firms causes costs for each firm to rise
Q3
Positive profits attract new firms and supply shifts out
S’
Price Price
Total MarketQuantityper period
Quantityper period
Long-Run Equilibrium: Increasing-Cost Industry
A Typical Firm (after entry) Total Market
q3
SMC’ MC’
AC’
S
D
p1
Q1
D’
p3
Q3
S’
The long-run supply curve will be upward-sloping
LS
Price Price
Quantityper period
Quantityper period
Long-Run Equilibrium: Decreasing-Cost Industry
• The entry of new firms may cause the average costs of all firms to fall– new firms may attract a larger pool of
trained labor– entry of new firms may provide a “critical
mass” of industrialization• permits the development of more efficient
transportation and communications networks
Long-Run Equilibrium: Decreasing-Cost Case
A Typical Firm (before entry) Total Market
q1
SMCMC
AC
S
D
P1
Q1
Suppose that we are in long-run equilibrium in this industry
P = MC = ACPrice Price
Quantityper period
Quantityper period
Long-Run Equilibrium: Decreasing-Cost Industry
A Typical Firm (before entry) Total Market
q1
SMC MC
AC
S
D
P1
Q1
Suppose that market demand rises to D’
D’
P2
Market price rises to P2 and firms increase output to q2
Q2q2
Price Price
Quantityper period
Quantityper period
Long-Run Equilibrium: Decreasing-Cost Industry
A Typical Firm (before entry) Total Market
q1
SMC’ MC’
AC’
S
D
P1
Q1
D’P3
Entry of firms causes costs for each firm to fall
Q3q3
Positive profits attract new firms and supply shifts out
S’
PricePrice
Quantityper period
Quantityper periodA Typical Firm (before entry)
Q1
Long-Run Equilibrium: Decreasing-Cost Industry
A Typical Firm (before entry) Total Market
q1
SMC’MC’
AC’
S
D
P1
Q1
The long-run industry supply curve will be downward-sloping
D’P3
Q3q3
S’
LS
Price Price
Quantityper period
Quantityper period
Classification of Long-Run Supply Curves
• Constant Cost– entry does not affect input costs– the long-run supply curve is horizontal at
the long-run equilibrium price
• Increasing Cost– entry increases inputs costs– the long-run supply curve is positively
sloped
Classification of Long-Run Supply Curves
• Decreasing Cost– entry reduces input costs– the long-run supply curve is negatively
sloped
Long-Run Elasticity of Supply• The long-run elasticity of supply (eLS,P)
records the proportionate change in long-run industry output to a proportionate change in price
LS
LSPLS Q
P
P
Q
P
Qe
in change %
in change %,
• eLS,P can be positive or negative
– the sign depends on whether the industry exhibits increasing or decreasing costs
Comparative Statics Analysis
• Comparative statics analysis of long-run equilibria can be conducted using estimates of long-run elasticities of supply and demand
• In the long run, the number of firms in the industry will vary from one long-run equilibrium to another
Comparative Statics Analysis• Assume that we are examining a
constant-cost industry
• Suppose that the initial long-run equilibrium industry output is Q0 and the typical firm’s output is q* (where AC is minimized)
• The equilibrium number of firms in the industry (n0) is Q0/q*
Comparative Statics Analysis• A shift in demand that changes the
equilibrium industry output to Q1 will change the equilibrium number of firms to
n1 = Q1/q*
• The change in the number of firms is
*q
QQnn 01
01
– determined by demand shift and the optimal output level for the typical firm
Comparative Statics Analysis
• The effect of a change in input prices is more complicated– we need to know how much minimum
average cost is affected– we need to know how an increase in long-
run equilibrium price will affect quantity demanded
Comparative Statics Analysis
• The optimal level of output for each firm may also be affected
• Therefore, the change in the number of firms becomes
**
0
0
1
101
q
Q
q
Qnn
Rising Input Costs and Industry Structure
• Suppose that the total cost curve for a typical firm in the bicycle industry is
C(q) = q3 – 20q2 + 100q + 8,000
and then rises to
C(q) = q3 – 20q2 + 100q + 11,616
• The optimal scale of each firm rises from 20 to 22 (where MC = AC)
Rising Input Costs and Industry Structure
• At q = 22, MC = AC = $672 so the long-run equilibrium price will be $672
• If demand can be represented byQD = 2,500 – 3P
then QD = 484
• This means that the industry will have 22 firms (484 22)
Producer Surplus in the Long Run
• Short-run producer surplus represents the return to a firm’s owners in excess of what would be earned if output was zero– the sum of short-run profits and fixed costs
Producer Surplus in the Long Run
• In the long-run, all profits are zero and there are no fixed costs– owners are indifferent about whether they
are in a particular market• they could earn identical returns on their
investments elsewhere
• Suppliers of inputs may not be indifferent about the level of production in an industry
Producer Surplus in the Long Run
• In the constant-cost case, input prices are assumed to be independent of the level of production– inputs can earn the same amount in
alternative occupations
• In the increasing-cost case, entry will bid up some input prices– suppliers of these inputs will be made better
off
Producer Surplus in the Long Run
• Long-run producer surplus is the extra return that producers make by making transactions at the market price over and above what they would earn if nothing were produced– the area above the long-run supply curve
and below the market price
Ricardian Rent• Assume that there are many parcels of
land on which a particular crop may be grown– the land ranges from very fertile land (low
costs of production) to very poor, dry land (high costs of production)
Ricardian Rent• At low prices only the best land is used
• Higher prices lead to an increase in output through the use of higher-cost land– the long-run supply curve is upward-sloping
because of the increased costs of using less fertile land
Ricardian Rent
Low-Cost Firm Total Marketq*
MC
AC
S
D
P*
Q*
The owners of low-cost firms will earn positive profits
Price Price
Quantityper period
Quantityper period
Ricardian Rent
Marginal Firm Total Marketq*
MC
AC
S
D
P*
Q*
The owners of the marginal firm will earn zero profit
Price Price
Quantityper period
Quantityper period
Ricardian Rent
• Firms with higher costs (than the marginal firm) will stay out of the market– would incur losses at a price of P*
• Profits earned by intramarginal firms can persist in the long run– they reflect a return to a unique resource
• The sum of these long-run profits constitutes long-run producer surplus
Ricardian Rent
For each firm, P – AC representsprofit per unit of output
Total MarketQuantity
S
D
P*
Q*
Each point on the supply curve represents minimum average cost for some firm
Total long-run profits can becomputed by summing over allunits of output
Price
Ricardian Rent• The long-run profits for the low-cost firms
may be reflected in the prices of the unique resources owned by those firms– the more fertile the land is, the higher its
price
• Thus, profits are said to be capitalized into inputs’ prices– reflect the present value of all future profits
Ricardian Rent
• It is the scarcity of low-cost inputs that creates the possibility of Ricardian rent
• In industries with upward-sloping long-run supply curves, increases in output not only raise firms’ costs but also generate factor rents for inputs
Economic Efficiency and Welfare Analysis
• The area between the demand and the supply curve represents the sum of consumer and producer surplus– measures the total additional value
obtained by market participants by being able to make market transactions
• This area is maximized at the competitive market equilibrium
Economic Efficiency and Welfare Analysis
Quantity per period
Price
P *
Q *
S
D
Consumer surplus is thearea above price and belowdemand
Producer surplus is thearea below price andabove supply
At output Q1, total surpluswill be smaller
Economic Efficiency and Welfare Analysis
Quantity per period
Price
P *
Q *
S
D
Q1
At outputs between Q1 andQ*, demanders would valuean additional unit more thanit would cost suppliers toproduce
Economic Efficiency and Welfare Analysis
• Mathematically, we wish to maximize
consumer surplus + producer surplus =
Q Q
dQQPQUdQQPPQPQQU0 0
)()(])([])([
• In long-run equilibria along the long-run supply curve, P(Q) = AC = MC
Economic Efficiency and Welfare Analysis
• Maximizing total surplus with respect to Q yields
U’(Q) = P(Q) = AC = MC
– maximization occurs where the marginal value of Q to the representative consumer is equal to market price
• the market equilibrium
Welfare Loss Computations
• Use of consumer and producer surplus makes it possible to calculate welfare losses caused by restrictions on voluntary transactions– in the case of linear demand and supply
curves, the calculation is simple because the areas of loss are often triangular
Welfare Loss Computations
• Suppose that the demand is given by
QD = 10 - P
and supply is given by
QS = P - 2
• Market equilibrium occurs where P* = 6 and Q* = 4
Welfare Loss Computations
• Restriction of output to Q0 = 3 would create a gap between what demanders are willing to pay (PD) and what suppliers require (PS)
PD = 10 - 3 = 7
PS = 2 + 3 = 5
The welfare loss from restricting outputto 3 is the area of a triangle
Welfare Loss Computations
Quantity per period
Price
S
D
6
4
7
5
3
The loss = (0.5)(2)(1) = 1
Welfare Loss Computations
• The welfare loss will be shared by producers and consumers– it will depend on the price elasticity of
demand and the price elasticity of supply to determine who bears the larger portion of the loss
• the side of the market with the smallest price elasticity (in absolute value)
Price Controls and Shortages
• Sometimes governments may seek to control prices at below equilibrium levels– this will lead to a shortage
• The changes in producer and consumer surplus from this policy show its impact on welfare
Price Controls and Shortages
Quantity per period
PriceSS
D
LS
P1
Q1
Initially, the market isin long-run equilibriumat P1, Q1
Demand increases to D’
D’
Price Controls and Shortages
Quantity per period
PriceSS
D
LS
P1
Q1
D’
Firms would begin toenter the industry
In the short run, pricerises to P2
P2
The price would endup at P3
P3
Price Controls and Shortages
Quantity
Price SS
D
LS
P1
Q1
D’
P3
There will be a shortage equal toQ2 - Q1
Q2
Suppose that thegovernment imposesa price ceiling at P1
This gain in consumersurplus is the shadedrectangle
Price Controls and Shortages
Quantity per period
PriceSS
D
LS
P1
Q1
D’
P3
Q2
Some buyers will gain because they can purchase the good for a lower price
The shaded rectangletherefore represents apure transfer fromproducers to consumers
Price Controls and Shortages
Quantity per period
Price
D
P1
Q1
D’
SS
LSP3
Q2
The gain to consumers is also a loss to producers who now receive a lower price
No welfare loss there
This shaded trianglerepresents the value of additional consumer surplus that would have been attained without the price control
Price Controls and Shortages
Quantity per period
PriceSS
D
LS
P1
Q1
D’
P3
Q2
This shaded trianglerepresents the value of additional producer surplus that would have been attained without the price control
Price Controls and Shortages
Quantity
PriceSS
D
LS
P1
Q1
D’
P3
Q2
This shaded arearepresents the total value of mutually beneficial transactions that are prevented by the government
Price Controls and Shortages
Quantity
Price SS
D
LS
P1
Q1
D’
P3
Q2
This is a measure of the pure welfare costs of this policy
Disequilibrium Behavior• Assuming that observed market
outcomes are generated by
Q(P1) = min [QD(P1),QS(P1)],
suppliers will be content with the outcome but demanders will not
• This could lead to a black market
Tax Incidence• To discuss the effects of a per-unit tax
(t), we need to make a distinction between the price paid by buyers (PD) and the price received by sellers (PS)
PD - PS = t
• In terms of small price changes, we wish to examine
dPD - dPS = dt
Tax Incidence• Maintenance of equilibrium in the
market requires
dQD = dQS
or
DPdPD = SPdPS
• Substituting, we get
DPdPD = SPdPS = SP(dPD - dt)
Tax Incidence
• We can now solve for the effect of the tax on PD:
DS
S
PP
PD
ee
e
DS
S
dt
dP
• Similarly,
DS
D
PP
PS
ee
e
DS
D
dt
dP
Tax Incidence
• Because eD 0 and eS 0, dPD /dt 0 and dPS /dt 0
• If demand is perfectly inelastic (eD = 0), the per-unit tax is completely paid by demanders
• If demand is perfectly elastic (eD = ), the per-unit tax is completely paid by suppliers
Tax Incidence
• In general, the actor with the less elastic responses will experience most of the price change caused by the tax
S
D
D
S
e
e
dtdP
dtdP
/
/
Tax Incidence
Quantity per period
PriceS
D
P*
Q*
PD
PS
A per-unit tax creates awedge between the pricethat buyers pay (PD) andthe price that sellers receive (PS)
t
Q**
Buyers incur a welfare lossequal to the shaded area
Tax Incidence
Quantity per period
PriceS
D
P*
Q*
PD
PS
Q**
But some of this loss goesto the government in theform of tax revenue
Sellers also incur a welfareloss equal to the shaded area
Tax Incidence
Quantity per period
PriceS
D
P*
Q*
PD
PS
Q**
But some of this loss goesto the government in theform of tax revenue
Therefore, this is the dead-weight loss from the tax
Tax Incidence
Quantity per period
PriceS
D
P*
Q*
PD
PS
Q**
Deadweight Loss and Elasticity
• All nonlump-sum taxes involve deadweight losses– the size of the losses will depend on the
elasticities of supply and demand
• A linear approximation to the deadweight loss accompanying a small tax, dt, is given by
DW = -0.5(dt)(dQ)
Deadweight Loss and Elasticity
• From the definition of elasticity, we know that
dQ = eDdPD Q0/P0
• This implies that
dQ = eD [eS /(eS - eD)] dt Q0/P0
• Substituting, we get
00
2
0
50 QPeeeeP
dtDW DSSD )]/([.
Deadweight Loss and Elasticity
• Deadweight losses are zero if either eD or eS are zero
– the tax does not alter the quantity of the good that is traded
• Deadweight losses are smaller in situations where eD or eS are small
Transactions Costs• Transactions costs can also create a
wedge between the price the buyer pays and the price the seller receives– real estate agent fees– broker fees for the sale of stocks
• If the transactions costs are on a per-unit basis, these costs will be shared by the buyer and seller– depends on the specific elasticities involved
Gains from International Trade
Quantity per period
Price
S
D
Q*
P*
In the absence ofinternational trade,the domesticequilibrium price would be P* andthe domesticequilibrium quantitywould be Q*
Gains from International TradePrice
Q*
P*
S
D
Quantity demanded willrise to Q1 and quantitysupplied will fall to Q2
Q1Q2
If the world price (PW)is less than the domesticprice, the price will fallto PW
PW
Imports = Q1 - Q2
imports
Quantity per period
Consumer surplus rises
Producer surplus falls
There is an unambiguouswelfare gain
Gains from International TradePrice
Q*
P*
S
D
Q2Q1
PW
Quantity per period
Effects of a TariffPrice
S
D
Q1Q2
PW
Quantity demanded fallsto Q3 and quantity suppliedrises to Q4
Q4 Q3
Suppose that the governmentcreates a tariff that raisesthe price to PR
PR
Imports are now Q3 - Q4
imports
Quantity per period
Consumer surplus falls
Producer surplus rises
These two triangles represent deadweight loss
The government getstariff revenue
Effects of a TariffPrice
S
D
Q1Q2
PW
Q4 Q3
PR
Quantity per period
Quantitative Estimates of Deadweight Losses
• Estimates of the sizes of the welfare loss triangle can be calculated
• Because PR = (1+t)PW, the proportional change in quantity demanded is
DDW
WR teeP
PP
Q
1
13
The areas of these twotriangles are
Quantitative Estimates of Deadweight Losses Price
S
D
Q1Q2
PW
Q4 Q3
PR
))((. 311 50 QQPPDW WR
12
1 50 QPetDW WD.
))((. 242 50 QQPPDW WR
22
2 50 QPetDW WS.
Quantity per period
Other Trade Restrictions• A quota that limits imports to Q3 - Q4
would have effects that are similar to those for the tariff– same decline in consumer surplus– same increase in producer surplus
• One big difference is that the quota does not give the government any tariff revenue– the deadweight loss will be larger
Trade and Tariffs• If the market demand curve is
QD = 200P-1.2
and the market supply curve is
QS = 1.3P,
the domestic long-run equilibrium will occur where P* = 9.87 and Q* = 12.8
Trade and Tariffs
• If the world price was PW = 9, QD would be 14.3 and QS would be 11.7
– imports will be 2.6
• If the government placed a tariff of 0.5 on each unit sold, the world price will be PW = 9.5
– imports will fall to 1.0
Trade and Tariffs• The welfare effect of the tariff can be
calculated
DW1 = 0.5(0.5)(14.3 - 13.4) = 0.225
DW2 = 0.5(0.5)(12.4 - 11.7) = 0.175
• Thus, total deadweight loss from the tariff is 0.225 + 0.175 = 0.4
Important Points to Note:• Short-run equilibrium prices are
determined by the intersection of what demanders are willing to pay (demand) and what firms are willing to produce (supply)– both demanders and suppliers act as price
takers
Important Points to Note:
• In the long run, the number of firms may vary in response to profit opportunities– the assumption of free entry and exit implies
that firms in a competitive industry will earn zero economic profits in the long run (P = AC)
Important Points to Note:• The shape of the long-run supply curve
depends on how entry affects input prices– in the constant-cost case, input prices do not
change and the long-run supply curve is horizontal
– if entry raises input costs, the long-run supply curve will have a positive slope
Important Points to Note:
• If shifts in long-run equilibrium affect input prices, the welfare of the suppliers of these inputs will be affected– such changes can be measured by changes
in the value of long-run producer surplus
Important Points to Note:• The concepts of consumer and producer
surplus provide useful ways of measuring the welfare impact of economic changes– changes in consumer surplus represent
changes in utility– changes in producer surplus represent
changes in the monetary returns that inputs receive
Important Points to Note:
• The competitive model can be used to study the impact of various economic policies– it can be used to measure the transfers
and welfare losses associated with price controls
Important Points to Note:
• The competitive model can also be applied to study taxation– the model illustrates tax incidence and the
welfare losses associated with taxation– similar conclusions can be derived by using
the competitive model to study transactions costs
Important Points to Note:
• A final, important application uses the competitive model to study international trading relationships– it can help us identify those who win and
those who lose with the opening of trade– it can also be used to study the welfare
implications of trade restrictions