Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author’s Argument. © 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11:...

13
Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author’s Argument

Transcript of Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author’s Argument. © 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11:...

Page 1: Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author’s Argument. © 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author's Argument 2 Author’s Argument An author’s.

Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author’s Argument

Page 2: Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author’s Argument. © 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author's Argument 2 Author’s Argument An author’s.

© 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author's Argument 2

Author’s Argument

An author’s argument is the opinion or belief that he or she wants to persuade readers to believe.

Page 3: Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author’s Argument. © 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author's Argument 2 Author’s Argument An author’s.

© 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author's Argument 3

Identify the Issue

Issue means the controversial topic the author is discussing.

Controversial issues on ones on which people disagree. Examples of controversial issues include the death penalty, gun control, foreign policy, and abortion.

Ask yourself, “Is the author writing about a controversial issue?”

Page 4: Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author’s Argument. © 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author's Argument 2 Author’s Argument An author’s.

© 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author's Argument 4

Determine the Author’s Argument

The author’s argument is his or her point of view on an issue.

Ask yourself, “What is the author’s position on the issue?”

Page 5: Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author’s Argument. © 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author's Argument 2 Author’s Argument An author’s.

© 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author's Argument 5

Step 1: Identify the Author’s Assumptions

An author’s assumptions consist of things the author takes for granted without presenting any proof (in other words, what the author believes or accepts as true and bases the argument on).

Ask yourself, “What does the author take for granted?”If the author’s assumptions are illogical or incorrect, the entire argument will be flawed. Readers may be misled unless they identify the author’s assumptions.

Page 6: Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author’s Argument. © 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author's Argument 2 Author’s Argument An author’s.

© 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author's Argument 6

Step 2: Identify the Types of Support

Types of support refers to the kind of evidence the author uses to back up the argument.

Ask yourself, “What kind of support does the author present to back the argument?”

Support can include research findings, case studies, personal experience or observation, examples, facts, comparisons, expert testimony and opinions.

Page 7: Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author’s Argument. © 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author's Argument 2 Author’s Argument An author’s.

© 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author's Argument 7

Step 3: Determine the Relevance of the Support

Relevance means the support is directly related to the argument.

Ask yourself, “Is the support directly related to the argument?”

Unless the author is an expert, his or her opinion or personal experience may not be particularly relevant.

Page 8: Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author’s Argument. © 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author's Argument 2 Author’s Argument An author’s.

© 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author's Argument 8

Step 4: Determine the Author’s Objectivity

The author’s argument has objectivity when the support consists of facts and other clear evidence.

Ask yourself, “Does the author present facts and clear evidence as support?”

Page 9: Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author’s Argument. © 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author's Argument 2 Author’s Argument An author’s.

© 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author's Argument 9

Step 5: Determine the Argument’s CompletenessAn argument is complete if the author presents adequate support and overcomes opposing points.

Sometimes authors do not give enough support.

Sometimes they leave out information that would weaken their argument. Their argument would be stronger if they presented it and countered it.

Page 10: Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author’s Argument. © 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author's Argument 2 Author’s Argument An author’s.

© 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author's Argument 10

Step 6: Determine if the Argument Is Valid

An argument is valid (has validity) if it is logical.

Ask yourself, “Is the argument logical (well-reasoned)?”

Page 11: Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author’s Argument. © 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author's Argument 2 Author’s Argument An author’s.

© 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author's Argument 11

Step 7: Decide if the Argument Is Credible

An argument has credibility if it is believable (convincing).

Ask yourself, “Is the author’s argument believable?”

Validity and credibility are closely related since an argument that is not valid will not be credible.

Page 12: Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author’s Argument. © 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author's Argument 2 Author’s Argument An author’s.

© 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author's Argument 12

The Edge: Pointers from the Coach

Don’t become overwhelmed because there are several steps in evaluating an author’s argument.

Watch out for your own biases when you evaluate an author’s argument.

Authors do not have to prove conclusively that their argument is correct. After all, not everything can be proved. They must, however, present an argument that is well-reasoned and well-supported.

Page 13: Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author’s Argument. © 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author's Argument 2 Author’s Argument An author’s.

© 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author's Argument 13

The Edge (continued)

There are several ways author’s try to manipulate readers into buying their argument. These are called propaganda techniques.

After you have read an author’s argument, go back through it. Mark the argument and each piece of support.