Chapter 1 - Springer978-1-137-53642-6/1.pdf · Notes Chapter 1 1. This section refers to Tan...

23
Notes Chapter 1 1. This section refers to Tan Gongrong (2008:9–14). 2. In his textbook The Evolution of Management Thought, Daniel Wren (1997) defines the history of management thought in four stages: early management thought; the scientific management era; the social man era; and the modern era. However, early management thought is not system- atic and cannot be abstracted into theories, and science of administration did not emerge at that time. For this reason this book rejects this era. 3. See for example, Yu and Feng 2010:8–15; Ding and Zhang 2007:113–117; Liang and Wang 2006:33–36; Ma and Yan 2009:157; Chen B. 2009:73– 78; Li R. 2006:123; and Liu Y. 2009:28–29. 4. The year of publications given in this section refer to the first edition, not necessarily the books or articles the author cite as listed in the bibliography. Chapter 2 1. Public administration is sometimes categorized into public management, but the mainstream in Western countries still classifies it into politics. 2. Cost function indicates pursuing the minimization of cost with a premise of fixed output; production function indicates pursuing the maximiza- tion of production with a premise of fixed input. Chapter 3 1. This section only offers an introduction to the development of public administration, so the time span is from 1887 to the 1960s. 2. It will be discussed in detail that Dwight Waldo is an advocator of New Public Administration theory. 3. Scholars generally name the period from 1887 when The Study of Admin- istration was published to 1968 when the first Minnowbrook Confer- ence was held as the stage of Traditional Public Administration. 4. “Public affairs officers” are those people we always refer to as “adminis- trative staff,” “bureaucrats,” and “civil officials.”

Transcript of Chapter 1 - Springer978-1-137-53642-6/1.pdf · Notes Chapter 1 1. This section refers to Tan...

Page 1: Chapter 1 - Springer978-1-137-53642-6/1.pdf · Notes Chapter 1 1. This section refers to Tan Gongrong (2008:9–14). 2. In his textbook The Evolution of Management Thought, Daniel

Notes

Chapter 1

1. This section refers to Tan Gongrong (2008:9–14). 2. In his textbook The Evolution of Management Thought, Daniel Wren

(1997) defines the history of management thought in four stages: early management thought; the scientific management era; the social man era; and the modern era. However, early management thought is not system-atic and cannot be abstracted into theories, and science of administration did not emerge at that time. For this reason this book rejects this era.

3. See for example, Yu and Feng 2010:8–15; Ding and Zhang 2007:113–117; Liang and Wang 2006:33–36; Ma and Yan 2009:157; Chen B. 2009:73–78; Li R. 2006:123; and Liu Y. 2009:28–29.

4. The year of publications given in this section refer to the first edition, not necessarily the books or articles the author cite as listed in the bibliography.

Chapter 2

1. Public administration is sometimes categorized into public management, but the mainstream in Western countries still classifies it into politics.

2. Cost function indicates pursuing the minimization of cost with a premise of fixed output; production function indicates pursuing the maximiza-tion of production with a premise of fixed input.

Chapter 3

1. This section only offers an introduction to the development of public administration, so the time span is from 1887 to the 1960s.

2. It will be discussed in detail that Dwight Waldo is an advocator of New Public Administration theory.

3. Scholars generally name the period from 1887 when The Study of Admin-istration was published to 1968 when the first Minnowbrook Confer-ence was held as the stage of Traditional Public Administration.

4. “Public affairs officers” are those people we always refer to as “adminis-trative staff,” “bureaucrats,” and “civil officials.”

Page 2: Chapter 1 - Springer978-1-137-53642-6/1.pdf · Notes Chapter 1 1. This section refers to Tan Gongrong (2008:9–14). 2. In his textbook The Evolution of Management Thought, Daniel

N o t e s274

Chapter 5

1. Management (Guanli) and Administration (Xingzheng) often create confusion when being translated into Chinese. For example, Simon’s famous Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision Making Processes in Administrative Organization is generally translated as “Guanli Xingwei” in Chinese. In fact, however, there are obvious differences between the two words. The original meaning of “administration” in Latin was to serve and hence later to govern; while the meaning of “management” was to control by hand. Therefore, the original intention of adminis-tration was to pay attention to services, while the original intention of management was to focus on control and results (Hughes 2003:3). Pub-lic administration is a type of activity aiming at serving the public that focuses on processes and how to turn policies into actions; while man-agement includes not only administration but also how an organization may achieve its goals and obtain maximum efficiency and results.

2. The “public administration” here refers to “traditional public administration.”

Chapter 6

1. His original name was David Ashworth and changed to Perri 6 in 1983.

Chapter 7

1. The Minnowbrook spirit first appeared in papers submitted to Minnow-brook III. It is a spirit that reflects on and criticizes current theories, allows and encourages new viewpoints, and advocates debates on aca-demic issues.

Chapter 8

1. For example: Public Administration and the Governance Process: Shift-ing the Political Dialogue (Wamsley, Wolf, and Goodsell et al. 1982), Refounding Public Administration (Wamsley et al. 1990), Refounding Democratic Administration: Modern Paradoxes, Postmodern Challenges (Wamsley et al. 1996), and Democracy and Public Administration: The Minnowbrook Perspective (Frederickson and Chandler. 1997) etc.

2. It refers to the adoption of privatization by the American government (the Reagan Administration) during the privatization movement.

3. During this period, the instrumental rationality school only consisted of Traditional Public Administration and Privatization theory.

4. It corresponds with some of the viewpoints of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs theory.

Page 3: Chapter 1 - Springer978-1-137-53642-6/1.pdf · Notes Chapter 1 1. This section refers to Tan Gongrong (2008:9–14). 2. In his textbook The Evolution of Management Thought, Daniel

N o t e s 275

Chapter 10

1. In the same year and 2004 and 2005, scholars also published on the sub-ject. For examples, Chapman 2003; Bentley, Kaye, and MacLeod 2004; and Chapman 2005.

2. In the same year, other scholars also published on the subject. For exam-ples, Blaug et al. 2006b; Blaug, Horner, and Lekhi 2006a; Cole and Parston 2006; and Cowling 2006.

3. See Cole and Parston 2006; Cowling 2006; Barber 2007; Erridge 2007; Alford and Hughes 2008; Alford and O’Flynn 2008; Charles et al. 2008; Coats and Passmore 2008; Constable, Passmore, and Coats 2008; Alford and O’Flynn 2009; Benington 2009; and Bozeman 2009.

Page 4: Chapter 1 - Springer978-1-137-53642-6/1.pdf · Notes Chapter 1 1. This section refers to Tan Gongrong (2008:9–14). 2. In his textbook The Evolution of Management Thought, Daniel

Bibliography

Alford, John and Owen Hughes. (2008). “Public Value Pragmatism as the Next Phase of Public Management.” American Review of Public Admin-istration 38(2):130–134.

Alford, John and Janine O’Flynn. (2008). “Public Value: A Stocktake of a Concept.” Paper presented at the twelfth annual conference of the Interna-tional Research Society for Public Management. Buenos Aires.

Alford, John and Janine O’Flynn. (2009). “Making Sense of Public Value: Concepts, Critiques and Emergent Meanings.” International Journal of Public Administration 32(3–4):71–91.

Allison, M. T. (2000). “Leisure, Diversity and Social Justice,” Journal of Lei-sure Research 32(1):2–6.

Audit Commission. (2003). Corporate Governance: Improvement and Trust in Local Government. http://ww2.unhabitat.org/cdrom/TRANSPAR-ENCY/html/yellowp/Y027.html.

Barber B. (2007). “Because They’re Worth It: A New Approach to Public Service Reform Is in the Air-Public Value.” Public Finance 1(1):22–23.

Behn, Robert D. (2001). Rethinking Democratic Accountability. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.

Bellah, Robert N., Richard Madsen, William M. Sullivan, Ann Swidler, and Steven M. Tipton. (1985). Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Com-mitment in American Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Bendix, Reinhard. (1956). Work and Authority in Industry: Ideologies of Man-agement in the Course of Industrialization. New York: John Wiley.

Benington J. (2009). “). “Creating the Public in Order to Create Public Value?” International Journal of Public Administration 32(3–4):232–249.

Benington, John and Mark H. Moore, eds. (2010). Public Value: Theory and Practice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Bentley, Tom, A. Kaye, and P. MacLeod. (2004). A Fair Go: Public Value and Diversity in Education. London: Demos.

Blaug, Ricardo, Louise Horner, and Rohit Lekhi. (2006a). Public Value, Citi-zen Expectations and User Commitment. A Literature Review. London: Work Foundation.

Blaug, Ricardo, Louise Horner, A. Kenyon, and Rohit Lekhi. (2006b). Pub-lic Value and Local Communities: A Literature Review. London: Work Foundation.

Page 5: Chapter 1 - Springer978-1-137-53642-6/1.pdf · Notes Chapter 1 1. This section refers to Tan Gongrong (2008:9–14). 2. In his textbook The Evolution of Management Thought, Daniel

B i b l i o g r a p h y278

Bozeman, Barry. (1988). “). “Exploring the Limits of Public and Private Sec-tors: Sector Boundaries as Maginot Line.” Public Administration Review 48(2):672–674.

Bozeman, Barry. (1993). Public Management: The State of Art. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publisher.

Bozeman, Barry. (2009). “). “Public Values Theory: ‘Three Big Questions.’” International Journal of Public Policy 4(5):369–375.

Bozeman, Barry and Jeffrey D. Straussman. (1990). Public Management Strategies: Guidelines for Managerial Effectiveness, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publisher.

Cai Lihui. (2003). “). “Public Management: Inherent Unity of the Essence of Publicness and the Goal of Function.” Journal of Renmin University of China 2:144–152.

Chandler, Ralph C. (1987). A Centennial History of the American Adminis-trative State. New York: Macmillan.

Chapman, Jake. (2003). “). “Public Value: The Missing Ingredient in Reform?” in Tom Bentley and James Wilson (eds.), The Adaptive State: Strategies for Personalising the Public Realm, pp. 124–131. London: Demos.

Chapman, Jake. (2005). “). “Defining Public Value in Health Care Provision in Nursing Management.” Nursing Management 12(3):32–35.

Charles, Michael B., Rachel Ryan, Cinthya Paredes Castillo, and Kerry Brown. (. (2008). “). “Safe and Sound? The Public Value Trade-Off in Worker Safety and Public Infrastructure Procurement.” Public Money and Management 28(3):159–166.

Chen Baosheng. (2009). “Instrumental Rationality and Value Rationality in Public Management Model Evolution.” Jianghuai Tribute (4):73–78.

Chen Qingyun. (2001). “Strengthen the Concepts of Public Administration and Improve the Socialization of Public Service.” Chinese Public Admin-istration (12):20–21.

Chen Zhenming. (1999). “From Public Administration, New Public Admin-istration to Public Management: Changes of Paradigm in Western Researches on Government Management.” CASS Journal of Political Sci-ence (1):79–88.

Chen Zhenming. (2002). “Towards a Practice Pattern of New Public Management—Perspective into the Reform Trends in Modern Western Governments.” Journal of Xiamen University (Arts and Social Sciences) (2):76–84.

Chen Zhenming. (2003). Public Management: A Research Approach Differ-ent from Theory of Traditional Public Administration. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.

Chen Zhenming. (2006). “Implementation of Strategic Management and Creation of Public Value: A Review of ‘Creating Public Value: Strate-gic Management in Government’ by Mark Moore.” Southeast Academic Research (2):27–34.

Page 6: Chapter 1 - Springer978-1-137-53642-6/1.pdf · Notes Chapter 1 1. This section refers to Tan Gongrong (2008:9–14). 2. In his textbook The Evolution of Management Thought, Daniel

B i b l i o g r a p h y 279

Chen Zhenming. (2010). “Disciplinary Orientation and Knowledge Accu-mulation of Public Management.” Administration Tribute (4):17–20.

Chinese Academy of Governance. (1998). “Translations on International Cooperation and Exchanges of Chinese Academy of Governance.” Review on Western Administration Reform. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Govern-ance Press.

Chris, Ansell and Alison Gash. (2007). “Collaborative Governance in The-ory and Practice.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18(4):543–571.

Christensen, Tom and Per Lægreid. (. (2006). “Post New Public Manage-ment: Whole of Government as a New Trend.” Chinese Public Adminis-tration (9):83–90.

Christensen, Tom and Per Lægreid. (2007). “The Whole of Government Approach to Public Sector Reform.” Public Administration Review 67(6):1059–1065.

Coats, David and Eleanor Passmore. (2008). Public Value: The Next Steps in Public Service Reform. London: Work Foundation.

Cole, Martin and Greg Parston. (2006). Unlocking Public Value: A New Model for Achieving High Performance in Public Service Organizations. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Constable, S., E. Passmore, and D. Coats. (. (2008). Public Value and Local Accountability in the NHS. London: Work Foundation.

Cooper, Philip J. (2007). Governing by Contract: Challenges and Opportuni-ties for Public Managers. Shanghai: Fudan University Press.

Cowling, Mark. (2006). Measuring Public Value: The Economic Theory. Lon-don: Work Foundation.

Daft, Richard L. (2004). Essentials of Organization Theory and Design. Bei-jing: China Machine Press.

Dahl, Robert A. (1947). “The Science of Public Administration: Three Prob-lems.” Public Administration Review 7(1):1–11.

Denhardt, Janet V. and Austin Lane Crothers. (1998). Street-Level Leadership: Discretion and Legitimacy in Front-Line Public Service. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.

Denhardt, Janet V. and Robert B. Denhardt. (2000). “The New Public Service: Serving Rather Than Steering.” Public Administration Review, 60(6):549–559.

Denhardt, Janet V. and Robert B. Denhardt. (2002). “The New Public Service: Serving Rather Than Steering.” Chinese Public Administration (10):38–44.

Denhardt, Janet V. and Robert B. Denhardt. (2003). The New Public Service: Serving Not Steering. Armonk: M. E. Sharp.

Denhardt, Janet V. and Robert B. Denhardt. (2004). The New Public Service: Serving Rather Than Steering. Beijing: China Renmin University Press.

Denhardt, Robert B. (1981). “Toward a Critical Theory of Public Organiza-tion.” Public Administration Review 41(6):628–635.

Page 7: Chapter 1 - Springer978-1-137-53642-6/1.pdf · Notes Chapter 1 1. This section refers to Tan Gongrong (2008:9–14). 2. In his textbook The Evolution of Management Thought, Daniel

B i b l i o g r a p h y280

Denhardt, Robert B. (1995). Public Administration: An Action Orientation. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College.

Denhardt, Robert B. (2003). Theories of Public Organization. Beijing: China Renmin University Press.

Dimock, Marchsall, Glagys Dimock, and Douglas Fox. (1983). Public Administration (fifth edition). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

Ding Huang. (1998). “Wilson’s Theory of Administration.” CASS Journal of Political Science (3):31–36.

Ding Huang. (2005). A History of Western Administrative Theories. Wuhan: Wuhan University Press.

Ding Huang and Zhang Yaqin. (2007). “Publicness: An Important Value Ori-entation of Western Administration Development.” Academia Bimestris (4):113–117.

Dong Lisheng and Li Yuyun. (2010). “The Evolution of Public Administra-tion Theory Viewed from the Dichotomy of Instrument-Value Rational-ity.” CASS Journal of Political Science (1):65–71.

Dong Lisheng and Liu Xuanhui. (2010). “Rethinking the Government Perfor-mance Management Process.” Chinese Public Administration (12):15–19.

Douglas, Skelley B. (2008). “The Persistence of the Politics-Administration Dichotomy: An Additional Explanation.” Public Administration Quar-terly 32(4):549–570.

Drucker, Peter F. (1968). The Age of Discontinuity: Guidelines to Our Chang-ing Society. New York: Harper & Row.

Drucker, Peter F. (2009). The Effective Executive. Beijing: China Machine Press.Du Gay, Paul. (2011). “Without Regard to Persons: Problems of Involve-

ment and Attachment in Post-bureaucratic Public Management,” in Stewart Clegg et al. (eds.), Managing Modernity: Beyond Bureaucracy? pp. 11–29. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Duan Gang. (2002). “Thoughts on the Refounding of Public Administration—Interview with Wamsley.” Lead Author of the Blacksburg Manifesto. Chi-nese Public Administration (2):54–55.

Dunleavy, Patrick, Helen Margetts, Simon Bastow, and Jane Tinkler. (2006). “New Public Management Is Dead—Long Live Digital-Era Governance,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16(3):467–494.

Durkheim, Émile. (1984). The Division of Labour in Society. New York: Mac-millan Publishing Co., Inc.

Durkheim, Émile. (1988). The Rules of Sociological Method. Beijing: Huaxia Publishing House.

Epple, Dennis and Richard E. Romano. (1996). “Ends against the Middle: Determining Public Service Provision When There Are Private Alterna-tives.” Journal of Public Economics 62(3):297–325.

Erridge, Andrew. (2007). “Public Procurement, Public Value and the Northern Ireland Unemployment Pilot Project.” Public Administration 85(4):1023–1043.

Page 8: Chapter 1 - Springer978-1-137-53642-6/1.pdf · Notes Chapter 1 1. This section refers to Tan Gongrong (2008:9–14). 2. In his textbook The Evolution of Management Thought, Daniel

B i b l i o g r a p h y 281

Farmer, David John. (2005). The Language of Public Administration: Bureau-cracy, Modernity and Postmodernity. Beijing: China Renmin University Press.

Fesler, James W. and Donald F. Kettl. (2002). The Politics of the Administra-tive Process. Beijing: China Renmin University Press.

Fox, Charles Johnson and Hugh T. Miller. (2003). Postmodern Public Admin-istration: Toward Discourse. Beijing: China Renmin University Press.

Frederickson, H. George. (1980). New Public Administration. Tuscaloosa:The University of Alabama Press.

Frederickson, H. George. (1989). “Minnowbrook II: Changing Epochs of Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 49(2):95–100.

Frederickson, H. George. (1990). “Public Administration and Social Equity.” Public Administration Review 50(2):228–237.

Frederickson, H. George. (1997). The Spirit of Public Administration. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Frederickson, H. George. (2003). The Spirit of Public Administration. Bei-jing: China Renmin University Press.

Frederickson, H. George. (2006). “Comparing the Reinventing Government Movement with the New Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 56(3):263–270.

Frederickson, George. (2011). New Public Administration. Beijing: China Renmin University Press.

Frederickson, George F. and Ralph Clark Chandler. (1997). “Democracy and Public Administration: The Minnowbrook Perspective.”. Special Issue. International Journal of Public Administration. 20(4–5): 817–1155.

Frederickson, George and Kevin B. Smith. (2008). The Public Administration Theory Primer. Shanghai: Shanghai University of Finance and Economics Press.

Friedman, Milton. (1955). “The Role of Government in Education,” in Rob-ert A. Solo (ed.), Economics and the Public Interest. New Brunswick: Rut-gers University Press.

Gaku, Gyosei. (2006). Administration. Beijing: China Renmin University Press.Gaus, John M. (1950). “Trends in the Theory of Public Administration.”

Public Administration Review 10(3):161–168.Georg, Claude S. (1985). The History of Management Thought. Beijing: The

Commercial Press.Getha-Taylor, Heather, M. H. Holmes, W. S. Jacobson, R. S. Morse, and J.

E. Sowa. (2011). “Focusing the Public Leadership Lens: Research Propo-sitions and Questions in the Minnowbrook Tradition.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21(Suppl.1):i83–i97.

Geuras, Dean and Charles Garofalo. (2005). Practical Ethics in Public Admin-istration (second edition). Vienna: Management Concepts.

Goldsmith, Stephen and William D. Eggers. (2008). Governing by Network: The New Shape of the Public Sector. Beijing: Peking University Press.

Page 9: Chapter 1 - Springer978-1-137-53642-6/1.pdf · Notes Chapter 1 1. This section refers to Tan Gongrong (2008:9–14). 2. In his textbook The Evolution of Management Thought, Daniel

B i b l i o g r a p h y282

Golembiewski, Robert T. (1977). Public Administration as a Developing Dis-cipline: Perspectives on Past and Present. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.

Goodnow, Frank Johnson. (1987). Politics and Administration: A Study in Government. Huaxia Publishing House.

Gordon, George J. and Michael E. Milakovich. (1995). Public Administra-tion in America. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Gruening, Gernod. (2001). “Origin and Theoretical Basis of New Public Management.” International Public Management Journal 4(1):1–25.

Gu, Guanghai. (2008). “Competitive Existence of Public Administration Paradigms.” Theory Monthly (2):90–92.

Gulick, Luther. (1925). “Principles of Administration.” National Municipal Review 14(7):400–403.

Gulick, Luther and Lyndall Urwick. (1937). Papers on the Science of Admin-istration. New York: Institute of Public Administration.

Guo Hongmei. (2004). “The Role of Pendleton Act in American His-tory.” Journal of Mudanjiang Teachers’ College (Natural Sciences edition) (3):42–43.

Guo Zhenglin and Xiao Bin. (2003). Normative and Positive Methods in Poli-tics. Guangzhou: Guangdong People’s Publishing House.

Guy, Mary Ellen. (1989). Minnowbrook II: Conclusion, Public Administra-tion Review 49(2):219–220.

Han Baozhong. (2009). “Study of Holistic Governance.” Journal of Public Administration. (31):1–48.

Hart, David K. (1974). “Social Equity, Justice and the Equitable Administra-tor.” Public Administration Review, 34(1):3–11.

Hayek, Friedrich. (1997). The Constitution of Liberty (Volume One). Shang-hai: Sanlian Publishing House.

He Yanling. (2009). “Public Value Management: A New Paradigm of Public Administration.” CASS Journal of Political Science (6):62–68.

He Ying. (2005). “Methodology in Public Administrative Research and an Analysis on Its Trend.” Chinese Public Administration (10):104–108.

He Ying. (2008). “Prospect of Administrative Philosophy.” Chinese Public Administration (6):63–67.

He Ying. (2012). Study on Administrative Philosophy. Beijing: Xuexi Publish-ing House.

Hennis, Wilhelm. (1988). Max Weber: Essays in Reconstruction. London: Allen & Unwin.

Henry, Nicholas. (2011). Public Administration and Public Affairs. Beijing: China Renmin University Press.

Hood, Christopher. (1991). “A Public Management for All Seasons?” Public Administration 69(1):3–19.

Horner, Louise and Louise Hazel. (2005). Adding Public Value. London: The Work Foundation.

Huff, Toby E. (1984). Max Weber and the Methodology of the Social Science. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.

Hu Jia (2009). “Holistic Governance: New Trend in Regional Public Service Reforms.” Journal of Chinese Academy of Governance (3):106–109.

Page 10: Chapter 1 - Springer978-1-137-53642-6/1.pdf · Notes Chapter 1 1. This section refers to Tan Gongrong (2008:9–14). 2. In his textbook The Evolution of Management Thought, Daniel

B i b l i o g r a p h y 283

Hughes, Owen E. (1994). Public Management and Administration: An Introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hughes, Owen H. (2007). Public Management and Administration: An Introduction. Beijing: China Renmin University Press.

Hume, David. (2009). A Treatise of Human Nature (Vol. 1). Beijing: The Commercial Press.

Ingraham, Patricia Wallace and David H. Rosenbloom. (1989). “The New Public Personnel and the New Public Service.” Public Administration Review 49(2):116–126.

Jenny, Harrow. (2005). “New Public Management and Social Justice: Just Efficiency or Equity as Well?” in Kate Mclaughlin, Stephen P. Osborne, and Ewan Ferlie (eds.), New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects, pp. 141–162. London: Routledge.

Ji Yanju. (2010). “How Industrial Revolution Changed the World.” Modern Science (4):259.

Jiang Weizhong. (1998). “The Second Industrial Revolution and American Urbanization.” Journal of Songliao (Social Science edition) (1):25–28+32.

Johnson, William C. (1995). Public Administration: Policy, Politics and Prac-tice (second edition). Madison: Brown and Benchmark.

Jreisat, Jamil E. (2003). Public Organization Management: The Development of Theory and Process. Shanghai: Shanghai Translation Publishing House.

Jun, Jong S. (1986). Public Administration: Design and Problem Solving. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Jun, Jong S. (2008). The Social Construction of Public Administration: Inter-pretive and Critical Perspectives. Beijing: Peking University Press.

June, J. S. (2004). “What Is Philosophy of Administration.” Journal of Bei-jing Administrative College (4):93–96.

Kakar, Sudhir. (1970). Frederick Taylor: A Study in Personality and Innova-tion. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Kalbberg, Stephen. (1980). “Max Weber’s Types of Rationality: Corner-stones for the Analysis of Rationalization Processes in History.” American Journal of Sociology 85(5):1145–1179.

Kast, Fremont E. and James E. Rosenzweig. (2000). Organization and Man-agement. Beijing: China Social Science Press.

Kelly, Gavin, Geoff Mulgan, and Stephen Muers. (2002). Creating Pub-lic Value: An Analytical Framework for Public Service Reform. London: Cabinet Office Strategy Unit. http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/media/cabinetoffice/strategy/assets/public_value2.pdf.

Kernaghan, Kenneth. (1986). “Evolving Patterns of Administrative Respon-siveness to the Public.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 52(1):7–16.

Kernaghan, Kenneth. (2009). “Moving Towards Integrated Public Govern-ance: Improving Service Delivery through Community Engagement.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 75(2):239–254.

King, Cheryl Simrell and Camilla Stivers. (2010). Government Is US: Public Administration in an Anti-government Era. Beijing: Central Compilation & Translation Press.

Page 11: Chapter 1 - Springer978-1-137-53642-6/1.pdf · Notes Chapter 1 1. This section refers to Tan Gongrong (2008:9–14). 2. In his textbook The Evolution of Management Thought, Daniel

B i b l i o g r a p h y284

Konn, Terry and Marc Holzer. (2000). “New Public Administration: The Search for Social Justice and Democratic Values.” Chinese Public Admin-istration (2):43–46.

Koven, Steven G. (1992). “Base Closings and the Politics-Administration Dichotomy Revisited.” Public Administration Review 52(5):526–531.

Kuhn, Thomas. (2003). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Shanghai: Peking University Press.

Lane, Jan-Erik. (2004). New Public Management. Beijing: China Youth Press.Lenin V. I. (1980). Collected Works of Lenin (Volume 22). Beijing: People’s

Publishing House.Levine, Charles H., B. Guy Peters, and Frank J. Thompson. (1990). Pub-

lic Administration: Challenges, Choices, Consequences. Glenview: Scott, Foresman/Little, Brown Higher Education

Levine, D. N. (1981). “Rationality and Freedom: Weber and Beyond.” Socio-logical Inquiry 51(1):5–25.

Lewis, Jenny M. (2010). “The Future of Network Governance Research: Strength in Diversity and Synthesis.” Public Administration 89(4): 1221–1234.

Li Peng. (2004). New Public Management and Application. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press (China).

Li Rui. (2006). “Managerialism and Constitutionalism: A Perspective to Per-ceive Western Public Administration.” Postgraduate Journal of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law (2):120–124.

Li Yuyun. (2012). “Review of Western Public Administration Theories since 1960s.” Journal of Shanghai Administration Institute (6):100–109.

Liang Hua and Wang Lijuan. (2006). “Philosophical Reflection on Chinese Public Administration: Conflicts and Adaptation of Instrumental Ration-ality and Value Rationality.” Journal of Shenyang University (1):33–36.

Liao Junsong. (2006). “Holistic Governance: A Future Proposition to Be Tested.” Taiwan Democracy Quarterly (3):201–206.

Lin Zhongyi. (1995). Policy Analysis: Theory and Practice. Taipei: Taiwan Ruixing Book Service.

Liu Junning. (1996). Market Society and Economic Order. Beijing: Sanlian Bookstore.

Liu Xuanhui. (2012). “Dilemma in Analysis of the Number of Civil Serv-ants.” Journal of Yunnan Academy of Governance (4):159.

Liu Yaodong. (2009). “Two Paradigms and Characteristics of Western Public Administration.” Study Monthly (4):28–29.

Lu Ming. (2001). “Evolution of Public Management Paradigms.” Chinese Public Administration (1):34–35.

Lynn, L. E. Jr. (2000). “Introduction: in Government, Does Management Matter?” In J. L. Brudney, L. J. O’Toole Jr., and H. G. Rainey (eds.), Advancing Public Management: New Developments in Theory, Methods and Practice. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Page 12: Chapter 1 - Springer978-1-137-53642-6/1.pdf · Notes Chapter 1 1. This section refers to Tan Gongrong (2008:9–14). 2. In his textbook The Evolution of Management Thought, Daniel

B i b l i o g r a p h y 285

Ma Jun. (2008). “Economic and Social Transformation and State Govern-ance Mode Change: Reforms in the U. S. Progressive Era.” in Public Management Research, Vol. 6. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Press.

Ma Jun and Yan Changwu. (2009). “Debates within Western Public Admin-istration: Administrative Science or Political Science?” Journal of Sun Yat-sen University (Social Sciences) (2):155–165.

Ma Jun and Ye Juanli. (2004). Frontier of Western Public Administration The-ories. Beijing: China Academy of Social Sciences.

Ma Jun, Zhang Chengfu, and He Yanling. (2009). Reflections on Chinese Pub-lic Administration: From Crisis to Rebuilding. Beijing: Central Compila-tion & Translation Press.

Mao Shoulong. (2006). The Summary of the Famous Works on Western Public Administration. Nanchang: Jiangxi People’s Publishing House.

Mao Shoulong, Li Mei, and Chen Youhong. (1998). Governance Transfor-mation of Western Governments. Beijing: China Renmin University Press.

Marini, Frank. (1971). Toward a New Public Administration: The Minnow-brook Perspective. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Company.

Marx, Fritz Morstein. (1957). The Administration State: An Introduction to Bureaucracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

McCurdy, H. E. (1986). Public Administration: A Bibliographic Guide to the Literature. New York: Marcel Dekker.

McGregor, Douglas. (2008). The Human Side of Enterprise. Beijing: China Renmin University Press.

Miller, David and Vernon Bogdanor. (1992). The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Political Science. Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press.

Mintzberg, Henry. (1996). “Managing Government, Governing Manage-ment.” Harvard Business Review 74(3):75–83.

Moe, Ronald C. (1987). “Exploring the Limits of Privatization.” Public Administration Review 47(6):453–460.

Montesquieu, C. L. (1961). The Spirit of the Law (Vol. 1). Beijing: The Com-mercial Press.

Moore, Mark H. (1995). Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Moore, Mark H. (2003). Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.

Moore, Mark H. (2013). Recognizing Public Value. London: Harvard Uni-versity Press.

Mosher, Frederick C. (1982). Democracy and the Public Service (second edi-tion). New York: Oxford University Press.

Moynihan, Donald P., Sergio Fernandez, Soonhee Kim, Kelly M. LeRoux, Suzanne J. Piotrowski, Bradley E. Wright, and Kaifeng Yang. (2011). “Performance Regimes amidst Governance Complexity.” Journal of Pub-lic Administration, Research and Theory 21(Suppl. 1):i141–i155.

Page 13: Chapter 1 - Springer978-1-137-53642-6/1.pdf · Notes Chapter 1 1. This section refers to Tan Gongrong (2008:9–14). 2. In his textbook The Evolution of Management Thought, Daniel

B i b l i o g r a p h y286

Nelissen, Nico and Peter de Goede. (2003). “Public Management: The Need for Ambiguity Tolerance and Moral Engagement.” International Journal of Public Administration 26(1):19–34.

Niels, Thorsen. (1989). “The Origins of Woodrow Wilson’s ‘the Study of Administration.’” American Studies in Scandinavia 21:16–30.

OECD. (1996). Public Management Service. Governance in Transition: Pub-lic Management Reforms in OECD Countries. Washington, DC: OECD Publications and Information Center.

OECD. (2005). Modernizing Government. Paris: OECD.O’Flynn, Janine. (2007). “From New Public Management to Public Value:

Paradigmatic Change and Managerial Implication.” The Australian Jour-nal of Public Administration 66(3):353–366.

O’Leary, Rosemary, David M. Van Slyke, and Soonhee Kim, eds. (2010). The Future of Public Administration around the World: The Minnowbrook Perspective. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Osborne, David. (1993). “Reinventing Government.” Public Productivity & Management Review 16(4):349–356.

Osborne, David and Ted Gaebler. (1992). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector. Shanghai: Shang-hai Translation Publishing House.

Osborne, David and Peter Plastrik. (2010). Banishing Bureaucracy. Beijing: China Renmin University Press.

Ostrom, Vincent. (1973). The Intellectual Crisis in American Public Admin-istration. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press.

Ostrom, Vincent. (1989). The Intellectual Crisis in American Public Admin-istration (second edition). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.

Ostrom, Vincent. (1999). The Intellectual Crisis in American Public Admin-istration. Shanghai: Shanghai Sanlian Bookstore.

O’Toole Jr., Laurence J. (1987). “Doctrines and Developments: Separation of Powers, the Politics-Administration Dichotomy, and the Rise of the Administrative State.” Public Administration Review 47(1):17–25.

Overeem, Patrick. (2005). “The Value of the Dichotomy: Politics, Admin-istration and the Political Neutrality of Administrators.” Administrative Theory & Praxis 27(2):311–329.

Paine, Thomas. (2009). Thomas Paine Collection. Beijing: The Commercial Press.

Peng Heping. (2008). Public Administration. Beijing: China Renmin Uni-versity Press.

Peng Heping and Zhu Lijia. (1997). Collection of Foreign Public Administra-tion Theories. Beijing: Party School of the Central Committee of CPC Press.

Peng Jinpeng. (2005). “Holistic Governance: Theories and Institutional Strategy.” Treatise on Political Science (23):61–100.

Perri 6. (1997). Holistic Government. London: Demos.Perri 6. (2003). “Institutional Viability: A Neo-Durkheimian Theory, Inno-

vation.” The European Journal of Social Science Research 16(4):395–415.

Page 14: Chapter 1 - Springer978-1-137-53642-6/1.pdf · Notes Chapter 1 1. This section refers to Tan Gongrong (2008:9–14). 2. In his textbook The Evolution of Management Thought, Daniel

B i b l i o g r a p h y 287

Perri 6. (2004). “Joined-Up Government in the Western World in Compara-tive Perspective: A Preliminary Literature Review and Exploration.” Jour-nal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14(1):103–138.

Perri 6, Diana Leat, Kimberly Seltzer, and Gerry Stoker. (1999). Governing in the Round: Strategies for Holistic Government, London: Demos.

Perri 6, Diana Leat, Kimberly Seltzer, and Gerry Stoker. (2002). Towards Holistic Governance: The New Reform Agenda. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Petty, William. (2010). Political Arithmetic. Beijing: China Social Science Press.Plano, Jack C. and Ralph C. Chandler. (1988). Public Administration Dic-

tionary. Chengdu: Sichuan People’s Publishing House.Pollit, Christopher. (1990). Managerialism and the Public Service: The Anglo-

American Experience. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Pugh, Derek S. and David J. Hickson. (1990). Writers on Organizations: An

Introduction. Beijing: China Renmin University Press.Rawls, John. (1988). A Theory of Justice. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.Rosenbloom, David H. (2008). “The Politics-Administration Dichotomy in

U.S. Historical Context.” Public Administration Review 68(1):57–60.Rosenbloom, David H. and Deborah D. Goldman. (1997). Public Adminis-

tration: Understanding Management, Politics, and Law in the Public Sector (fourth edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Rosenbloom, David H. and Robert S. Kravchuk. (2007). Public Administra-tion: Understanding Management, Politics, and Law in the Public Sector. Beijing: China Renmin University Press.

Sabine, George Holland. (1986). A History of Political Theory. Beijing: Com-mercial Press.

Salamon, Lester M. (2002). The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.

Sapru, R. K. (2011). Administrative Theories and Management Thought (sec-ond edition). New Delhi: PHI Learning Private Limited.

Sartori, Giovanni. (1993). The Theory of Democracy Revisited. Beijing: The Oriental Publishing House.

Savas, Emanuel S. (1982). Privatizing the Public Sector: How to Shrink Gov-ernment. New Jersey: Chatham House Publishers.

Savas, Emanuel S. (2002). Privatization and Public-Private Partnerships. Bei-jing: China Renmin University Press.

Sayre, Wallace S. (1958). “Premises of Public Administration: Past and Emerging.” Public Administration Review 18(2):102–105.

Schein, Edgar H. (2009). Organizational Psychology. Beijing: China Renmin University Press.

Shafritz, Jay M., Albert C. Hyde, and Sandra J. Parkes. (2010). Classics of Pub-lic Administration (fifth edition). Beijing: China Renmin University Press.

Shafritz, Jay M., E. W. Russell, and Christopher P. Borick. (2011). Introduc-ing Public Administration (sixth edition). Beijing: China Renmin Univer-sity Press.

Page 15: Chapter 1 - Springer978-1-137-53642-6/1.pdf · Notes Chapter 1 1. This section refers to Tan Gongrong (2008:9–14). 2. In his textbook The Evolution of Management Thought, Daniel

B i b l i o g r a p h y288

Shang Huping and Wang Jing. (2010). “The 120 Years of Public Administra-tion: from ‘Double Helix Evolution’ to ‘Theory of Administrative Perfor-mance Management.’” Journal of Beijing Administrative College (4):40–45.

Shi Shaocheng. (2007). “Three Stages of Administration Theories Development from the Perspective of Order Dichotomy.” Theoretic Observation (5):72–74.

Shi Zhengyi. (2009). “The Thought of Public Administration: Hesitation between Constitutionalism and Managerialism.” Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Social Sciences edition) (2):55–59.

Simon, Herbert A. (1947). Administrative Behavior. New York: Collier Mac-millan Ltd.

Simon, Herbert A. (1982). The New Science of Management Decision. Beijing: China Social Science Press.

Simon, Herbert A. (2008). Administrative Behavior. Beijing: China Machin-ery Industry Press.

Smith, Adam. (1937). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. New York: Random House.

Smith, Adam. (2005). The Wealth of Nations. Beijing: Huaxia Press.Song Min. (2010). A Study of New Public Administration. Jinan: Shandong

University.Staats, Elmer B. (1988). “Public Service and the Public Interest.” Public

Administration Review 48(2):601–605.Starr, Paul. (1987). “The Limits of Privatization” (Proceedings of the Acad-

emy of Political Science) Prospects for Privatization 36(3):124–137.Stigler, George. (1975). The Citizen and the State. Chicago: University of

Chicago Press.Stillman II, Richard. J. (1988). Public Administration: Concepts and Cases

(Vol.1). Beijing: China Social Science Press.Stillman II, Richard. J. (2004). Public Administration: Concepts and Cases.

Beijing: China Renmin University Press.Stoker, Gerry. (2006). “Public Value Management: A New Narrative for

Networked Governance?” American Review of Public Administration 36(1):41–57.

Su Guoxun. (1988). Rationalization and Its Restrictions: Introduction to Weber’s Theory. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House.

Sun Xueyu. (2007). Public Administration. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.

Tan Gongrong. (2008). Schools of Thoughts of Public Administration in the West. Beijing: Peking University Press.

Tang Xinglin. (2000). Public Administration: History and Thought. Guang-zhou: Sun Yat-sen University Press.

Taylor, Frederick Winslow. (1911). The Principles of Scientific Management, New York, : Harper & Brothers.

Taylor, Frederick Winslow. (1911). Shop Management. New York: Harper & Brothers.

Page 16: Chapter 1 - Springer978-1-137-53642-6/1.pdf · Notes Chapter 1 1. This section refers to Tan Gongrong (2008:9–14). 2. In his textbook The Evolution of Management Thought, Daniel

B i b l i o g r a p h y 289

Taylor, Frederick Winslow. (1984). The Principles of Scientific Management. China Social Science Press.

Taylor, Frederick Winslow. (2003). Testimony Before the Special House Com-mittee (1912). Routledge.

Tenbruck, Friedrich H. (1980). “The Problem of Thematic Unity in the Works of Max Weber.” British Journal of Sociology 31(3):316–351.

Thomas, John Clayton. (2010). Public Participation in Public Decisions. Bei-jing: China Renmin University Press.

Thompson, Victor A. (1975). Without Sympathy or Enthusiasm: The Problem of Administrative Compassion. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.

Van Dooren, Wouter. (2006). Performance Measurement in the Flemish Public Sector: A Supply and Demand Approach. Doctor dissertation. University of Leuven.

Waldo, Dwight. (1948). The Administrative State: A Study of the Political Theory of American Public Administration. New York: The Ronald Press Company.

Waldo, Dwight. (1955). The Study of Public Administration. New York: Ran-dom House.

Waldo, Dwight. (1965). “Administrative State Revisited.” Public Adminis-tration Review 25(1):5–30.

Waldo, Dwight. (1971). Public Administration in a Time of Turbulence. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Co.

Wallace, Walter L. (1990). “Rationality, Human Nature, and Society in Weber’s Theory.” Theory and Society 19(2):199–223.

Wamsley, Gary L. (1990). Refounding Public Administration. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

Wamsley, Gary L. and Jim F. Wolf, eds. (1996). Refounding Democratic Pub-lic Administration: Modern Paradoxes, Postmodern Challenges. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Wamsley, Gary L., Charles T. Goodsell, John A. Rohr, Orion F. White, and Jim F. Wolf. (2002). “Public Administration and the Governance Process: Shifting the Political Dialogue (Excerpts).” Chinese Public Administration (2):26–29.

Wang Huiyan. (1999). Principles of Political Science. Beijing: Higher Educa-tion Press.

Wang Huiyong. (2004). “Publicness: Value Pursuit of Public Management Culture.” Seeker (6):73–75.

Wang Huning. (1989). Ecological Analysis of Administration. Shanghai: Fudan University Press.

Wang Lefu. (2002). “On Differences and Interactions between Public Admin-istration and Public Management.” Management World (12):48–51.

Wang Wei. (2010). “Public Participation in Public Administration in the West: Reflection on Experience and Progress in Theory.” Journal of Public Administration (2):163–191.

Page 17: Chapter 1 - Springer978-1-137-53642-6/1.pdf · Notes Chapter 1 1. This section refers to Tan Gongrong (2008:9–14). 2. In his textbook The Evolution of Management Thought, Daniel

B i b l i o g r a p h y290

Way, Jonathan. (2010). “Instrumental Rationality.” Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://www.rep.routledge.com/license.

Weber, Max. (1947). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. London: Collier Macmillan Publisher.

Weber, Max. (1978). Economy and Society (2 Vols.). Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Weber, Max. (1987). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Beijing: SDX Joint Publishing Company.

Weber, Max. (1997). Economy, Society and Religion. Shanghai: Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences Press.

Weber, Max. (1998). Methodology of Social Sciences. Beijing: Central Compila-tion and Translation Press.

Weber, Max. (2004). Max Weber’s Complete Writings on Academic and Politi-cal Vocations (I). Guilin: Guangxi Normal University Press.

Weber, Max. (2010). Economy and Society (I). Shanghai: Shanghai Century Publishing House.

Weng Shihong. (2010). “Emergence of the Mode of Holistic Governance: Theory and Practice of Holistic Governance in the Government Govern-ance in the UK.” Journal of Shanghai Administration Institute (2):51–59.

White, Jay D. and Guy B. Adams. (2006). Research in Public Administration: Reflections on Theory and Practice. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.

White, Leonard D. (1926). Introduction to the Study of Public Administra-tion. New York: Macmillan.

White, Leonard D. (1939). Introduction to the Study of Public Administration (revised edition). New York: Macmillan.

White, Leonard D. (1947). Introduction to the Study of Public Administra-tion. Shanghai: Commercial Press.

White, O. F., and J. F. Wolf. (1990). Refounding Public Administration. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

Williams, Iestyn and Heather Shearer. (2011). “Appraising Public Value: Past, Present, and Futures.” Public Administration 89(4):1367–1385.

Wilson, Woodrow. (1887). “The Study of Administration.” Political Science Quarterly 2(2):197–222.

Wren, Daniel. (2009). The History of Management Thought. Beijing: China Social Science Press.

Wu Aiming and Liu Jin. (2010). The Essence of Classics in Public Administra-tion. Beijing: Renmin University Press.

Xia Shuzhang. (1999). The Harvard Administration Complete Works (The Upper Volume). Beijing: Red Flag Publishing House.

Xiao Jun. (2005). “Progressive System Civilization: History and Contri-butions of British Civil Service System.” Chinese Public Administration (1):67–70.

Xu Datong. (2001). Contemporary Western Political Trends of Thought (since the 1970s). Tianjin: Tianjin People’s Press.

Xu Liyi. (2003). “Review of Development of Public Administration Theo-ries, Parts I and II.” National Open University Review (305):53–59and (306):45–54.

Page 18: Chapter 1 - Springer978-1-137-53642-6/1.pdf · Notes Chapter 1 1. This section refers to Tan Gongrong (2008:9–14). 2. In his textbook The Evolution of Management Thought, Daniel

B i b l i o g r a p h y 291

Yan Changwu and Ma Jun. (2010). A Century of Controversy over Public Administration. Beijing: China Renmin University Press.

Yang Hongshan. (2004). “Constitutionalism, Managerialism and Policism: Different Paradigms in Public Administration Theories.” Journal of China National School of Administration (1):33–37.

Yin Haifeng. (2011). “Role of the Second Industrial Revolution and Imperi-alism in the History of World Development.” Journal of Weifang Educa-tional College (3):60–61.

Ying Songnian and Ma Qingyu. (2004). Public Administration. Beijing: China Fangzheng Press.

Yu Jianxing and Feng Tao. (2010). “Seeking the Balance between Efficiency and Equality: From the Perspective of Public Administration Develop-ment History.” Thinking (1):8–15.

Yu Keping. (2000). Governance and Good Governance. Beijing: Social Sci-ences Academic Press (China).

Zanetti, Lisa A. (1997). “Advancing Praxis: Connecting Critical Theory with Practice in Public Administration.” American Review of Public Adminis-tration 27(2):145–167.

Zeng Fanjun and Wei Bin. (2010). “Holistic Governance: Governance Logics of Service Government.” Journal of Guangdong Institute of Public Admin-istration (1):22–25.

Zeng Jun. (2006). New Introduction to Public Management: System, Values and Tools. Beijing: People’s Publishing House.

Zeng Lingfa. (2010a). “Action Logic of Holistic Governance.” Chinese Pub-lic Administration (1):110–114.

Zeng Lingfa. (2010b). Exploration into Ways of Governmental Cooperation: A Study on the Blair Administration’s Reforms in the UK (1997–2007). Beijing: The People’s Press.

Zhang Chengfu. (2001). “Managerialism of Public Administration: Reflec-tions and Criticism.” Journal of Renmin University of China (1):15–21.

Zhang Chengfu and Dang Xiuyun. (2001). The Public Management Science. Beijing: China Renmin University Press.

Zhang Guoqing. (1998). Public Administration. Beijing: Peking University Press.

Zhang Guoqing. (2007). Public Administration. Beijing: Peking University Press.

Zhang Jinjian (Jhang Jin Jian). (1974). New Theories on Administration. Tai-pei: San Min Book Co., Ltd.

Zhang Kangzhi. (2001). “Hard-headed Thinking on the Fever of Public Management.” Journal of Xi’an Institute of Political Science (6):60–64.

Zhang Kangzhi. (2002). “Public Administration: Transcending Instrumental Rationality.” Zhejiang Social Sciences (4):3–8.

Zhang Kangzhi. (2005). “A Look at the Practical Significance of Administra-tive Ethics Research during the Evolution of Public Administration.” Jour-nal of Xiangtan University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) (5):41–49.

Zhang Kangzhi. (2008). Concepts and Visions of Administration Ethics. Beijing: China Renmin University.

Page 19: Chapter 1 - Springer978-1-137-53642-6/1.pdf · Notes Chapter 1 1. This section refers to Tan Gongrong (2008:9–14). 2. In his textbook The Evolution of Management Thought, Daniel

B i b l i o g r a p h y292

Zhang Kangzhi and Cheng Qian. (2010). “Emergence of Democratic Admin-istration and Its Practical Value.” Administrative Tribune (4):21–25.

Zhang Mengzhong. (2000). “An Overview of American Public Adminis-tration in the Last One Hundred Years, Parts I and II.” Chinese Public Administration (5):42–46 and (6):37–43.

Zhang Mengzhong. (2001). “Review on the Root and Paradigm Shift of Public Administration. Part II.” Chinese Public Administration (7):25–28.

Zhang Ming and Lu Daoping. (2008). History of Western Administration and Management Thought. Tianjin: Nankai University Press.

Zhang Runshu. (Jhang Run Shu) (1978). Science of Administration. Taipei: San Min Book Co., Ltd.

Zhang Ting. (2013). Study on the Privatization of Public Services—Case Study of the Heating Service in Jingyuan County. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University Press.

Zhang Yanling and Long Ren. (2001). The World History. Beijing: China Zhigong Press.

Zhou Dunyao. (2000). “On Assumption about Human Nature.” Journal of Guangxi University (edition of philosophy and social sciences) (6):1–8.

Zhou Zhiren. (2008). Public Administration in Practice and Perception. Bei-jing: Peking University Press.

Zhu Lijia and Li Junpeng. (2012). Public Management. Beijing: Economic Science Press.

Zhu Qianwei. (2003). Public Administration. Shanghai: Fudan University Press.

Zhu Qianwei. (2008a). Principal Theories of Public Administration. Shang-hai: Fudan University Press.

Zhu Qianwei. (2008b). “From New Public Management to Holistic Govern-ance.” Chinese Public Administration (10):52–58.

Page 20: Chapter 1 - Springer978-1-137-53642-6/1.pdf · Notes Chapter 1 1. This section refers to Tan Gongrong (2008:9–14). 2. In his textbook The Evolution of Management Thought, Daniel

administrative decentralization, 183assumption about human nature,

9–10, 13, 18, 40, 43–44, 48, 51, 54, 57–59, 64, 87, 89, 95, 105, 111, 124–126, 132, 146–147, 151, 156, 174–175, 177, 181–182, 184, 194, 212–214, 221, 223, 225, 234, 251–252, 255–259, 269–270

Blacksburg Manifesto, 15, 187–189, 204

blend, 149, 256, 267. Compare division

collaborative government, 268cooperation, 52, 72–74, 79,

99, 108–109, 140–143, 146, 149–153, 170, 210, 229, 235, 237–238, 240, 258

coordination, 5, 46, 53, 56, 78, 80, 82, 135, 140–142, 146–153, 234, 237–238, 240, 258, 268

core value, 9–10, 13, 18, 29, 40–41, 48–49, 57–59, 64, 85, 87, 95, 98, 104, 111, 121, 123, 131, 144–146, 150–151, 154, 156, 172–173, 181, 184, 192, 204, 210, 221, 223, 225, 232, 245, 251–253, 255–256, 259, 267–268

democracy, 29, 37, 51, 53, 63, 91, 97–98, 132, 144, 147, 159, 170–171, 174, 182–183, 197, 204, 207, 209–211, 220,

222–223, 227, 234, 240, 247, 255, 257–258, 265–266

democratic administration, 5, 9, 14–15, 17–19, 20, 23, 26, 29, 51–54, 58, 156, 160, 171, 182–183, 177, 187, 189–194, 197, 199, 202–205, 209, 213–214, 218, 223, 252, 254–257, 260, 262–263, 265–267, 269

Denhardt and Denhardt, 5, 15, 31, 54, 91, 208, 210–217, 219, 221–223, 257

Denhardt, Janet V., 124, 139Denhardt, Robert B., 173, 214Denhardts, 5, 15, 17, 156,

208–211, 213–218, 220–221, 223

disciplinary orientation, 11, 48, 57–58, 96, 110–111, 131, 134, 152, 182, 184, 202, 222, 238–239, 253, 255, 258–259. See also disciplinary positioning

disciplinary positioning, 9, 11, 13, 18, 40, 47, 57, 59, 64, 93, 95, 110, 129, 150, 156, 179, 202, 217, 223, 237, 247, 251–252, 254. See also disciplinary orientation

division, 9, 39–40, 58–59, 72–73, 82–83, 90, 144, 153, 189, 192, 203, 208, 223, 266–269. Compare integration

efficiency, 3, 5, 8, 12, 18, 23, 26, 28–31, 36–38, 41–42, 44–45,

Index

Page 21: Chapter 1 - Springer978-1-137-53642-6/1.pdf · Notes Chapter 1 1. This section refers to Tan Gongrong (2008:9–14). 2. In his textbook The Evolution of Management Thought, Daniel

I n d e x294

efficiency (Continued) 47–48, 54–56, 58, 62, 65, 71–72, 74, 76–77, 79, 85–87, 89–91, 93–99, 102, 104–106, 109–110, 113–115, 117–127, 129–137, 140, 144–145, 150–151, 153–155, 157, 159, 172–173, 175, 179, 181–182, 184–185, 190, 204, 210–211, 213, 215, 220, 223, 227, 240, 243–244, 247, 253–254, 256, 260, 262–263, 265–266, 269

empirical analysis, 90, 107, 111

fairness, 28, 31, 50–51, 56–58, 88, 132, 147, 153–154, 173, 181, 231, 258, 265–268

governance, 4, 6, 8–9, 11, 15–20, 23, 26, 28, 41, 44–45, 48, 54, 57–59, 110–111, 116, 126, 132, 139–155, 167, 169, 171, 180, 187–188, 192, 195–197, 199–200, 202–204, 209, 211–212, 216, 218, 220–223, 225–227, 230, 234, 236–240, 245–248, 252, 255, 257–262, 265–266, 268–269

helmsman, 18, 45, 108, 111, 129, 131, 149, 208, 215

holistic governance, 8–9, 16–20, 23, 28, 41, 44–45, 48, 58–59, 126, 139–155, 203, 227, 234, 238, 252, 257–258, 260–262, 265–266, 268–269

Hood, Christopher, 15, 17, 116–117, 267–268

instrumental rationality, 1, 8–9, 14–17, 20, 23, 27–28, 30, 32–48, 54–55, 58–59, 61, 85, 90–91, 97–101, 104, 111, 113, 116, 121, 123–124, 127, 132, 134–137, 142, 144, 146,

148–155, 162, 173, 179–181, 184, 192, 197, 203, 205, 209, 211, 214, 218–219, 221–223, 225–226, 236, 239, 242–243, 245–247, 252, 255–271. Compare value rationality

integration, 7, 9, 32, 38, 59, 74, 105, 121, 139–142, 148–149, 151–152, 154, 171–172, 223, 225–226, 239, 245, 247, 252, 257–260, 263, 266–270. Compare division

integrator, 18, 148–149, 152, 199, 203, 258

joined-up government, 268

Keynesianism, 68, 101, 125, 129, 254

management science, 6, 18, 26, 81, 95, 97, 110–111, 131, 196, 255–256, 264

market mechanism, 134–135, 197–198, 233

matrix model, 183methodology, 2, 9–11, 13, 18,

39–40, 44, 48, 55, 57–59, 64, 89–91, 95–96, 99, 107, 111, 126–127, 131–133, 147–148, 152, 156, 177, 180, 182, 184, 197, 214, 221, 223, 226, 235, 246, 251–253, 255–259

Moore, Mark H., 16–17, 156, 225, 228–233, 237–239, 241–243, 248, 268

neo-Durkheimianism, 44, 148, 152, 258

networked governance, 225–227, 230, 234, 236–237, 239–240, 245–247, 259, 265, 268

new organizational theory, 183new public administration, 4–6, 9,

14–16, 18–20, 23, 29, 49–54,

Page 22: Chapter 1 - Springer978-1-137-53642-6/1.pdf · Notes Chapter 1 1. This section refers to Tan Gongrong (2008:9–14). 2. In his textbook The Evolution of Management Thought, Daniel

I n d e x 295

58, 101, 111, 123, 126, 131, 137, 151, 139, 151, 154, 156–163, 171–184, 191–192, 194, 197, 199, 202–205, 209, 213, 223–224, 226, 236, 242, 245, 247, 252–256, 259–260, 262–267, 269

new public management, 4–6, 8–9, 14–15, 17–20, 23, 28, 41, 44–45, 47–48, 57–59, 86, 101, 110–127, 129–137, 139–140, 142, 144–155, 164–166, 169, 171–172, 174, 191, 205, 207–209, 211–212, 214–216, 219, 221–223, 229, 234, 236, 239, 243–245, 252, 254, 256–258, 260, 262–264, 266, 268–269

new public service, 4–6, 9, 15–20, 23, 29, 51, 54, 58, 139, 142, 154, 156, 207–224, 226, 236, 238, 242, 245–247, 252, 256–257, 259–263, 267, 269

Ostrom, Vincent, 5, 15, 17, 26, 53–54, 83, 85–86, 156, 187, 189–190

paradigm, 4–7, 10, 12, 26, 40, 75, 119, 129, 137, 139, 183, 189–190, 227–228, 239, 242, 244, 268

pendulum movement, 12, 14, 17, 19, 39, 77–78, 100–102, 111, 115–116, 123, 126–127, 129, 131, 137, 142, 146–148, 150, 153–155, 162, 184, 192, 205, 209, 222, 224, 226–227, 251–261

performance, 7, 10, 18, 28, 41–43, 57, 70, 74, 82, 104–108, 110–111, 116–123, 125–126, 129–131, 133–137, 141, 143–144, 151, 164, 166–168, 171–172, 174, 184, 193, 211,

228, 230–232, 236, 241–245, 257, 266, 269

Perri 6, 16, 139–142, 144–149, 151–154

political science, 3, 25–26, 29–30, 45, 47–51, 57, 64–66, 70, 94–99, 119, 130, 158, 161, 164, 182, 188, 202, 242, 264, 266

politics-administration dichotomy, 4, 6–7, 20, 25–27, 37, 39, 42, 46–50, 63–66, 69–70, 77, 83, 87, 90–91, 94, 96, 98, 121, 178, 182–183, 202, 269

positive analysis, 18, 131, 202principal-agent theory, 107,

114–115, 126, 255privatization theory, 9, 14–15,

19–20, 23, 45, 57, 101, 105, 110–112, 114, 121, 125–127, 129, 131, 137, 149, 151, 155, 172, 187, 208, 212, 215–216, 219, 222, 252, 255–256, 260–266, 269

public choice theory, 107, 114, 116, 118, 124, 126, 137, 190, 255

public spirit, 8, 23, 49, 54, 57–58, 65, 88, 97, 132, 176, 181–182, 184, 211–212, 233, 237, 265, 270. See also publicness

publicness, 7, 21, 27, 29, 44, 49–50, 95, 97, 156, 173, 180, 184, 226, 247, 254, 259, 266. See also public spirit

public-private partnership, 14, 16, 108–109, 268

rational economic man, 18, 105–106, 111, 124, 127, 131, 221, 256–257, 270

rationality, 1, 4, 8–9, 12, 14–20, 23, 27–28, 30, 32–51, 53–59, 61, 64, 66, 75–77, 84–85, 87–91, 97–101, 104, 111, 113–114, 116, 121, 123–125, 127, 132, 134–137, 144, 146–157,

Page 23: Chapter 1 - Springer978-1-137-53642-6/1.pdf · Notes Chapter 1 1. This section refers to Tan Gongrong (2008:9–14). 2. In his textbook The Evolution of Management Thought, Daniel

I n d e x296

rationality (Continued)162, 172–173, 177, 179–185, 187, 189, 191–192, 197–198, 202–203, 205, 207, 209–211, 214, 218–219, 221–227, 232, 234–236, 239, 242–243, 245–247, 251–252, 254–271. See also instrumental rationality and value rationality

role of government, 57, 59, 101, 226, 229–230, 236–237, 241, 246, 251, 256

scientific management, 2–4, 6–8, 14, 16, 30–31, 37–38, 47–48, 52, 64, 69–77, 81, 86–87, 89–90, 98–99, 137, 174, 218, 243

serving, 2, 15, 17, 26, 54, 117, 144, 154, 208–210, 213, 218–219, 221, 223, 260

social man, 2, 52, 126, 146–147, 247, 257, 260, 270

steering, 15, 17, 54, 108, 118, 127–130, 208–210, 219, 244, 255

steersman, 18, 127, 131, 133, 149

theory of bureaucracy, 36, 75–77, 86traditional public administration,

3–4, 6, 8–10, 14, 16–18, 20,

23, 26, 28, 30, 41, 45, 50, 53, 58–59, 61, 77–78, 80, 83, 85–89, 91–93, 95–100, 105, 107, 110–111, 114, 116, 120–127, 129–132, 137, 144–145, 149–152, 155, 162, 172–175, 177–179, 181–182, 184, 193, 208, 210–212, 215–216, 219, 222, 229, 234, 236, 239–239, 243–245, 252–255, 259–260, 262–266, 269

transaction cost theory, 107, 114–115, 126, 255

value rationality, 1, 8–9, 12, 14–16, 19–20, 23, 27–28, 30, 32–40, 44, 49–51, 54–58, 97–98, 100, 111, 116, 127, 132, 135–137, 142, 146–147, 149–157, 162, 172, 177, 180, 184–185, 187, 189, 191–192, 197, 203, 205, 207, 209–210, 214, 218, 221–223, 225–227, 232, 236, 239, 243, 245–247, 251–252, 254–271. Compare instrumental rationality

Weber, Max, 7, 16, 27–28, 32–36, 39, 47, 55, 74–77, 81, 86–92, 129, 147