Chapter 1. Introductionrsucivilengineering.weebly.com/uploads/7/7/6/4/77644974/final... ·...

Chapter 1

Introduction

1.1 Purpose City/Municipality’s Vision**

Key issues facing the community **

**must have *nice to have

Goals for the plan, and how the plan will help to alleviate the

issues facing the community**

Intent of RA 9003 and its effect on solid waste management*


Example:

1.2 Approach Approach**

Data sources*


Example:

1.3 Acknowledgement*


Example:

Chapter 2

City/Municipal Profile


2.1 Location Location of the city/municipality including map indicating

locations of barangays, as well as residential, commercial,

and industrial centers, and agricultural areas**

Land area**

2.2 History*

Example:


2.3 Population Current population for each barangay, indicating rural and

urban areas**

10-yr projection**

Example:


2.4 Economic Profile/Land Use List of industries within the city/municipality**

Example:

Example:

• Land use map, in particular showing the urban and rural

land use classification**

Example:

Example:

• Major transportation routes and traffic conditions**


2.5 Physical

Characteristics Geography,

geology,

hydrology, soil

and climate of

the area or

region**

Example:

Example:

Chapter 3. Current Solid

Waste Management

Conditions

3.1 Institutional Arrangements**

• List of existing agencies of the city

administration that handle SWM its services, and

the roles and responsibilities of the agencies.

Should include all aspects of SWM such as:

collection, recycling, disposal, IEC, accounting,

implementation and enforcement of regulations.

**

Source: Municipality of Alabel, 10 year SWM Plan.

3.2 Inventory of Equipment and

Staff List of existing equipment**

its capacity and

present conditions,

make,

model,

location for repairs, and others.

Number of personnel (with classification- working in

SWM by department or type of service)**

Type of staff training available

3.3 Source Reduction**

• Discussion of existing waste reduction

practices.

3.4 Collection**

Description of existing system for each service area,including those serviced by private haulers

Type of collection (segregated vs. non-segregated)

Frequency of collection to same area for each type ofcollection

Description of areas not currently receiving collectionservice

If collection service is by a private hauler, provide a listof the haulers, service areas, types of waste collected,location where waste is deposited.

3.5 Transfer

Description of facilities used to transfer solid

waste.

List of facilities including location, capacity, types

of materials accepted, and source of materials.

3.6 Processing Facilities**

Description of facilities used for processing waste, such

as:

material recovery facilities (MRFs)

composting facilities.

List of facilities including

location,

capacity,

types of materials accepted,

source of materials, and

brief description of operations.

3.7 Final Disposal**

Description of facilities used for the final disposal

of solid waste or residues from processing.

List of facilities including location, ownership,

capacity, types of materials accepted, source of

materials, brief description of operations, and

number of scavengers.

Evaluation of the situation of scavengers

working at existing dumpsite.

Special Wastes

• Report of available information on the quantities

of these wastes disposed. **

• Health Care Wastes ** Existing treatment and disposal practices of infectious and other

health care wastes.*

Report of available information on the quantities of these wastes

disposed.*

Markets for Recyclables

List of junk shops in the city/municipality.

Include types and quantities of materials

accepted if possible.**

List of industries in the city/municipality

that use or could use recycled materials.**

Information, Education and

Communication

Description of IEC program.**

List of IEC activities. Include message, targeted

audience, and effectiveness.**

Costs and Revenues

Annual budget for SWM.**

Expenditures for previous year. Include

capital investment, operation and

maintenance, and contracted services.*

Revenues for previous year. Include

revenues from allocations, from fees

charged for the service, and from fines.*

Key Issues

• Brief description of key solid waste

management issues facing the

community.**

LOCAL SWM PLAN

COMPONENT A: WACS

(What is suppose to be seen in

Chapter 4)

How important is a WACS?

1. Waste Generation Projection,10-year

planning period

2. Basis for Chapter 6, target setting;

3. Chapter 7- for the intervention based in

Chapter 6 targets;

4. Projection of Types of Waste for

Diversion in Chapter 8

4.0 waste characteristics

Uses results of WACS and recycling information to determine

quantity and composition of waste generated **

The LGU must give brief introduction of this

component and may describe how important a WACS

is, how it was conducted including sample

determination and identification.

Sample Brief Introduction• WACS is the process of gathering information on the quantity (e.g., tons per day, cubic

meters per day, kilograms per household) and composition (e.g., biodegradable and non-biodegradable) and weight of solid wastes generated from various major sources.

• In order to formulate an achievable waste management plan, planners must have knowledge on the type of waste, weight & volume, and composition of wastes generated within the Municipality. Because the data will guide planners in formulating appropriate waste management strategies, designing facilities, institutional arrangements, and provide baseline information for LGUs to monitor and evaluate its SWM performance in reducing waste generation

• WACS requires preparation and training before the conduct of actual WACS. Identification of the major sources of waste both residential and non-residential sources and sample size determination for both major sources is necessary prior to WACS.

• Sample size for residential sources was determined using Slovin’s Formula at 5% margin of error while 10% of the total number of non-households by category was also taken as sample size.

4.1 Disposed Waste (from WACS)

4.1.1 Quantity of Waste Disposed by Sector

(Residential,Commercial,Institutional,Industrial)

in kgs/day & tons/year)

Table ___. Summary on the Quantity & Waste , Municipality/City

of ______, 2014-2023.

Table 17.docx

Table 17.docx

Table 15.docx

Table 15.docx

Table 17.docx

Table 17.docx

4.1 Disposed Waste (from WACS)

4.1.1 Quantity of Waste Disposed by Sector

(Residential,Commercial,Institutional,Industrial)

in kgs/day & tons/year)

Based on the summary of WACS results shown in

Table 17, a total quantity of 63,510 kgs per day or

23,181 tons per year of waste disposed by sector or

from major sources of waste such as residential,

commercial, institutional, and industrial sources.

However, the daily volume of waste actually

disposed by the LGU in its current collection areas is

only ________ cubic meter/day or equivalent to

______kgs./day or _____ tons per year..

Table 17.docx

Table 17.docx

Present in a pie chart the Waste

generations from the four major sources;

PIE CHART SHOWING WASTE GENERATION, ALL MAJOR

SOURCES

TOTAL WASTE GENERATION,

0.00%

RESIDENTIAL, 80.43%

COMMERCIAL , 16.67%

INSTITUTIONS, 1.62% INDUSTRIAL, 1.28%

RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INSTITUTIONS INDUSTRIAL

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL, 0.00%

URBAN, 24.88%

RURAL, 49.84%

SUBDIVISION,

5.71%

URBAN

RURAL

SUBDIVISION

Food Establishment

s, 8.28%General Stores, 2.92%

Malls, 0.30%

Public Market, 3.29%

Service Centers, 1.89%

Food Establishments

General Stores

Malls

Public Market

Service Centers

School, 1.03%

Offices, 0.30%

Hospital, 0.05%

Clinics, 0.03%

Church, 0.01%

Bus Station, 0.04%

Financing, 0.15%

School

Offices

Hospital

Clinics

Church

Bus Station

Financing

Food Processing,

0.00%

Manufacturing, 0.65%

Mills, 0.04%

Food Processing

Manufacturing

Mills

COMMERCIAL

INSTITUTIONAL

INDUSTRIAL

OPTIONAL

From the same Table, residential source is being rated asthe biggest waste generator, followed by the Commercial,Institutional & Industrial sources with the following percent sharesof 80.43%, 16.67%, 1.62% and 1.28%, respectively. On thesame Table, it also shows that biodegradable waste has thehighest percent waste composition of about 58.62% over therecyclables, residuals & special waste with respective percentshares of 19.57%; 20.59 & 1.22%.

Table 17, also shows that the LGU has a maximum potentialfor diversion (MPD) of 91.80% broken down as follows:

Biodegradable - 58.62%;

Recyclable - 19.57%; and

Residual with - 13.61

Maximum Potential for Diversion = 91.80%

Total Potential Materials for Recycling & Resource Recovery = 33.18%

Biodegradable, 58.62%

Recyclable, 19.57%

Residuals, 20.59%

Special, 1.22%

Biodegradable

Recyclable

Residuals

Special

Percent waste composition, LGU

LEVEL

Optional pie chart:

Types of waste under biodegradable waste

composition (Residential & Non-Residential

level);

Percent share of waste types under

biodegradable at residential level

Yard waste, 38.59%

Veg & Fruit residues, 11.94%

Fish cleanings, 4.01%

Food /kitchen wastes, 4.66%

Animal carcassess, 0.77%

Agricultural wastes, 2.00%

Yard waste

Veg & Fruit residues

Fish cleanings

Food /kitchen wastes

Animal carcassess

Agricultural wastes

4.2 Diverted Waste

4.2.1 Quantity of waste currently recycled and composted based on 3.4 & 3.6** (3.3 & 3.6);

a. Source reduction (3.3) such as backyard composting (pit method), windrows composting and any other methods

b List of MRFs (Composting & Recycling) including location, capacity, Types of materials accepted, source of materials

c List of Junkshops (get estimated quantity of recyclables bought per day within the LGU) ;

d Add altogether the above (a+b+c) =Total waste diverted of the LGU

Table 17.docx

Table 17.docx

4.3 Generated Waste

4.3.1 Quantity of Waste Generated (disposed + diverted)**

Make a brief discussion with reference to Table 17 again , emphasizing waste disposed in Chapter 4.1 based on WACS + diverted ( 4.2.1) = the LGU Generated Waste.

4.3.2 Projection of quantity of waste generated based on population (residential Level) PLUS Projection quantity non-residential level EQUALS LGU projected waste generation within the 10-year planning period.

How to make Projection at the Non-HH level

Waste Projection.xlsx

Waste Projection.xlsx

TABLE _____ Waste Projection from Residential & Non-Residential Sources, CY 2014-2023.

MAJOR SOURCES

Waste 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Generation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

per day (kgs) Quantity Quantity Quantity Quantity Quantity Quantity Quantity Quantity Quantity Quantity

Residential 51,078 18,643.47Proj Popn X

pcg

Proj Popn X

pcg

Proj Popn X

pcg

Proj Popn X

pcg

Proj Popn X

pcg

Proj Popn X

pcg

Proj Popn X

pcg

Proj Popn X

pcg

Proj Popn X

pcg

Non-residential 12,432 13,919.21 15,584.34 17,448.66 19,536.00 21,873.05 24,489.67 27,419.32 30,699.43 34,371.93 38,483.77

TOTAL 63,510 32,562.68

Summary on the Quantity & Waste Composition

for the LGU, Residential Level, 2014-2023.

Summary on the Quantity & Waste Composition from

Sample Sources, Residential Level, 2014-2023.

Summary on the Quantity & Waste Composition from

Sample Sources, Non-Residential Level, 2014-2023

OTHER TABLES (Part of the Plan or Part of the

Annexes)

Table 15.docx

Table 15.docx

TABLE 15. Summary Showing the Quantity and Composition of Waste Disposed from the City of San Jose, Residential Level, CY 2014.

Outright

Sando

bagsThin films

Composit

ePP Others Sub Total

For

Disposal

Urban Brgys

Abar 1st 17,007 0.36 6,153.92 12.05% 3,361.97 1,216.42 25.4 127.17 115.23 332.17 327.16 927.12 549.84 1,476.97 98.57

FE Marcos 1,576 0.61 954.7 1.87% 521.56 188.71 3.94 19.73 17.88 51.53 50.75 143.83 85.3 229.13 15.29

R. Rueda 2,240 0.28 636.35 1.25% 347.64 125.78 2.63 13.15 11.92 34.35 33.83 95.87 56.86 152.73 10.19

C. Sanchez 1,479 0.41 607.45 1.19% 331.86 120.07 2.51 12.55 11.37 32.79 32.29 91.52 54.27 145.79 9.73

Calaocan 3,752 0.24 906.36 1.77% 495.16 179.16 3.74 18.73 16.97 48.92 48.18 136.55 80.98 217.53 14.52

Sibut 5,554 0.3 1,678.77 3.29% 917.14 331.84 6.93 34.69 31.43 90.61 89.25 252.92 150 402.91 26.89

Malasin 5,906 0.18 1,054.57 2.06% 576.12 208.45 4.35 21.79 19.75 56.92 56.06 158.88 94.22 253.1 16.89

Canuto Ramos 2,477 0.25 621.83 1.22% 339.71 122.91 2.57 12.85 11.64 33.56 33.06 93.68 55.56 149.24 9.96

R. Eugenio 1,783 0.25 447.6 0.88% 244.53 88.48 1.85 9.25 8.38 24.16 23.8 67.43 39.99 107.43 7.17

Sto. Niño 1st 5,882 0.47 2,738.80 5.36% 1,496.24 541.37 11.31 56.6 51.28 147.83 145.6 412.62 244.71 657.32 43.87

Sub-Total 47,656 15,800 30.93% 8,631.94 3,123.19 65.22 326.51 295.85 852.85 839.98 2,380.41 1,411.74 3,792.15 253.07

% Share Urban 54.63% 19.77% 0.41% 2.07% 1.87% 5.40% 5.32% 15.07% 8.93% 24.00% 1.60%

Total

Residual

Waste

Special

Major SourcesPopulatio

n (2014)

PCG*

kgs/pers

on/ day

Total Waste

Generation

(kgs/day)

Waste Composition (kgs/day)

Kgs./dayPercenta

ge

Biodegra

dable

Recyclabl

e

Residual with potential for diversion

Outright

Sando

bagsThin films

Composit


For

Disposal

Rural Brgys

A. Pascual 1,575 0.24 371 0.73% 247.54 44.58 1.27 6.22 4.37 20 22.13 53.99 23.02 77.01 2.35

Abar 2nd 2,768 0.39 1,082 2.12% 721.01 129.84 3.69 18.13 12.72 58.26 64.47 157.26 67.05 224.31 6.86

Bagong Sikat 2,172 0.49 1,058 2.07% 704.91 126.94 3.61 17.72 12.43 56.96 63.03 153.75 65.55 219.3 6.7

Caanawan 4,354 0.19 807 1.58% 537.94 96.88 2.76 13.53 9.49 43.47 48.1 117.33 50.02 167.36 5.11

Camanacsacan 1,720 0.48 827 1.62% 551.03 99.23 2.82 13.85 9.72 44.52 49.27 120.19 51.24 171.43 5.24

Culaylay 1,892 0.28 523 1.02% 348.57 62.77 1.79 8.76 6.15 28.16 31.17 76.03 32.41 108.44 3.31

Dizol 974 0.34 335 0.66% 223.19 40.19 1.14 5.61 3.94 18.03 19.96 48.68 20.75 69.43 2.12

Kaliwanagan 2,755 0.59 1,614 3.16% 1,075.45 193.67 5.51 27.04 18.97 86.9 96.16 234.57 100.01 334.58 10.23

Kita Kita 5,444 0.55 3,020 5.91% 2,012.44 362.41 10.31 50.6 35.49 162.61 179.94 438.95 187.14 626.08 19.13

Manicla 2,041 0.43 877 1.72% 584.3 105.22 2.99 14.69 10.3 47.21 52.24 127.45 54.34 181.78 5.56

Palestina 4,683 0.31 1,447 2.83% 964.28 173.65 4.94 24.24 17.01 77.92 86.22 210.32 89.67 299.99 9.17

Parang Mangga 964 0.85 819 1.60% 545.82 98.29 2.8 13.72 9.63 44.1 48.8 119.05 50.76 169.81 5.19

Pinili 2,939 0.32 941 1.84% 627.3 112.97 3.21 15.77 11.06 50.69 56.09 136.82 58.33 195.16 5.96

Porais 3,369 0.43 1,463 2.86% 974.87 175.56 4.99 24.51 17.19 78.77 87.17 212.63 90.65 303.29 9.27

San Agustin 3,197 0.46 1,457 2.85% 970.9 174.85 4.97 24.41 17.12 78.45 86.81 211.77 90.29 302.05 9.23

San Juan 1,878 0.68 1,281 2.51% 853.77 153.75 4.37 21.47 15.06 68.99 76.34 186.22 79.39 265.61 8.12

San Mauricio 1,159 0.73 847 1.66% 564.44 101.65 2.89 14.19 9.95 45.61 50.47 123.11 52.49 175.6 5.37

Sinipit Bubon 1,429 0.51 724 1.42% 482.72 86.93 2.47 12.14 8.51 39 43.16 105.29 44.89 150.18 4.59

Sto. Niño 2nd 3,324 0.31 1,030 2.02% 686.52 123.63 3.52 17.26 12.11 55.47 61.38 149.74 63.84 213.58 6.53

Sto. Niño 3rd 5,314 0.63 3,322 6.50% 2,213.43 398.61 11.34 55.65 39.04 178.85 197.91 482.78 205.83 688.61 21.05

sto. Tomas 5,089 0.43 2,209 4.33% 1,472.26 265.13 7.54 37.02 25.96 118.96 131.64 321.12 136.91 458.03 14

Tabulac 1,237 0.19 231 0.45% 153.68 27.68 0.79 3.86 2.71 12.42 13.74 33.52 14.29 47.81 1.46

Tayabo 4,660 0.31 1,423 2.79% 948.31 170.78 4.86 23.84 16.72 76.62 84.79 206.84 88.18 295.03 9.02

Tondod 3,401 0.28 964 1.89% 642.15 115.64 3.29 16.15 11.32 51.89 57.42 140.06 59.71 199.78 6.11

Tulat 1,532 0.31 477 0.93% 318 57.27 1.63 8 5.61 25.69 28.43 69.36 29.57 98.93 3.02

Villa Floresta 737 0.4 296 0.58% 197.34 35.54 1.01 4.96 3.48 15.95 17.64 43.04 18.35 61.39 1.88

Villa Joson 1,763 0.96 1,698 3.32% 1,131.51 203.77 5.8 28.45 19.96 91.43 101.17 246.8 105.22 352.02 10.76

Villa Marina 1,712 0.3 509 1.00% 338.85 61.02 1.74 8.52 5.98 27.38 30.3 73.91 31.51 105.42 3.22

Sub-Total 74,082 31,654 61.97% 21,092.52 3,798.45 108.05 530.32 371.98 1,704.30 1,885.95 4,600.61 1,961.42 6,562.03 200.55

% Share Rural 66.64% 12.00% 0.34% 1.68% 1.18% 5.38% 5.96% 14.53% 6.20% 20.73% 0.63%

Total

Residual

Waste

Special


n (2014)

PCG*

kgs/pers

on/ day

Total Waste

Generation

(kgs/day)


Kgs./dayPercenta

ge

Biodegra

dable

Recyclabl

e


Outright

Sando

bagsThin films

Composit


For

Disposal

Subdivision

Christianville 777 0.14 106 0.21% 56.73 21.01 0.02 2.67 1.82 9.33 2.9 16.74 10.58 27.32 0.57

Curamen 612 0.08 51 0.10% 27.3 10.11 0.01 1.28 0.87 4.49 1.39 8.05 5.09 13.15 0.27

Encarnacion 500 0.9 452 0.89% 242.78 89.94 0.11 11.42 7.78 39.93 12.4 71.64 45.28 116.92 2.44

Habitat 1,250 0.27 339 0.66% 181.83 67.36 0.08 8.56 5.82 29.91 9.28 53.65 33.91 87.56 1.83

Josephine 1,765 0.18 319 0.62% 171.14 63.4 0.08 8.05 5.48 28.15 8.74 50.5 31.92 82.42 1.72

Melcar 1,025 0.17 177 0.35% 94.92 35.16 0.04 4.47 3.04 15.61 4.85 28.01 17.7 45.71 0.95

NH Housing 60 0.39 23 0.05% 12.47 4.62 0.01 0.59 0.4 2.05 0.64 3.68 2.33 6.01 0.13

Ramar 1,900 0.16 300 0.59% 161.26 59.74 0.07 7.59 5.16 26.52 8.23 47.58 30.08 77.66 1.62

Roseville 500 0.19 96 0.19% 51.63 19.12 0.02 2.43 1.65 8.49 2.64 15.23 9.63 24.86 0.52

Rufina II 280 0.16 44 0.09% 23.58 8.74 0.01 1.11 0.76 3.88 1.2 6.96 4.4 11.36 0.24

Rufina III 315 0.77 243 0.48% 130.33 48.28 0.06 6.13 4.17 21.44 6.65 38.45 24.31 62.76 1.31

Rufina IV 2,212 0.5 1,107 2.17% 594.74 220.32 0.26 27.99 19.05 97.82 30.37 175.48 110.93 286.41 5.98

St. Cecilia 575 0.13 77 0.15% 41.17 15.25 0.02 1.94 1.32 6.77 2.1 12.15 7.68 19.83 0.41

Villa Ramos 1,852 0.16 291 0.57% 156.46 57.96 0.07 7.36 5.01 25.73 7.99 46.16 29.18 75.35 1.57

SUB-TOTAL 13,623 3,624 7.10% 1,946.33 721.02 0.86 91.58 62.34 320.12 99.38 574.28 363.02 937.3 19.57

% SHARE 53.70% 19.89% 0.02% 2.53% 1.72% 8.83% 2.74% 15.85% 10.02% 25.86% 0.54%

TOTAL 135,361 51,078 100.00% 31,670.79 7,642.67 174.13 948.42 730.17 2,877.27 2,825.31 7,555.30 3,736.17 11,291.47 473.19

% of Total 62.00% 14.96% 0.34% 1.86% 1.43% 5.63% 5.53% 14.79% 7.31% 22.11% 0.93%

Total

Residual

Waste

Special


n (2014)

PCG*

kgs/pers

on/ day

Total Waste

Generation

(kgs/day)


Kgs./dayPercenta

ge

Biodegra

dable

Recyclabl

e


CHAPTER 5. LEGAL/

INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK

5.1 Local Laws and Regulations

• Related laws and regulations and their relevant provisions. (Authority and description)**

• Permitting procedures for solid waste facilities as well as inspection and compliance procedures.*

Note: *nice to have

**must have

LAWS AND

REGULATION/ORDINAN

CES

TITLE RELEVANT

PROVISIONS

Municipal Ordinance No. 02,

Series of 2009

An Ordinance Creating

a System of Ecological

Waste Management

Declaring Certain …

Defined the moral duties

and obligations of every

one in solid waste

management system.

Table 5.1. Local and Related Laws and Regulations and their Relevant

Provisions

Source: Legal Office, 2015

Source: City of Zamboanga

Plan

5.2 Roles

Roles of the City SWM Board, the city, barangay, private entities and institutions as generators, citizens, NGOs and recycling companies.**

Note: *nice to have

**must have

5.3 City/Municipal Solid Waste

Management Board

• Sangguniang Bayan Ordinance No. for creating the CSWM Board.**

• List of members of the CSWM Board.**

• Description of activities to date and planned activities.**

Note: *nice to have

**must have


Plan

Source: Maria Aurora Plan

5.4 Barangay Solid Waste

Management Committees

• List of BSWM Committees formed to date and schedule for Boards in other barangays**

Note: *nice to have

**must have

5.5 Stakeholders Participation

• Activities conducted and future plans to involve stakeholders in development and implementation of plan.*

Note: *nice to have

**must have


CHAPTER 6. PLAN STRATEGY

6.1 Vision

• Discussion of vision and goals*

Note: *nice to have

**must have

Source: Maria Aurora

Plan


Plan

6.2 Targets

• Diversion targets for each year, 10-year

planning period (more than 25%).**

• Disposal targets for each year, 10-year

planning period.**

Note: *nice to have

**must have


Plan

6.3 Strategies

• Brief description of strategies to reach diversion targets (detail will be provided in Section 7).**

• General description of coordination with barangays to implement segregated collection, MRFs, and composting facilities.**

Note: *nice to have

**must have

6.3 Strategies

• General description of collection.*

• Overview of plans for disposal.**

• Discussion of other key elements of

strategy.*

Note: *nice to have

**must have

Chapter 7

SWM System

7. SWM System

- Detailed description of each program that will be implemented to reach the

objectives and targets defined in Section 6 -

7.1 Source Reduction

7.2 Collection

7.2.1 Overview

7.2.2 Collection equipment and routes

7.2.3 Private collection service

7.2.4 Storage and setout

7.2.5 Segregated recyclables

7.2.6 Segregated compostables

7.2.7 Mixed solid waste/residuals

7.3 Segregation, Recycling, and Composting

7.3.1 Segregation

7.3.2 Recycling

7.3.3 Composting/ Management of Biodegradable Waste

7.3.4 Marketing and Market Development

7.4 Transfer (if applicable)

7.5 Alternative Technologies for Residual Wastes

7.6 Disposal

7.6.1 SW Disposal Capacity

7.6.2 Existing Facilities

7.6.3 New Facilities

7.6.4 Categorized Disposal Facilities (Sanitary

Landfill) Design

7.7 Special Wastes

7.7.1 Health Care Wastes

7.8 Information, Education and Communication (IEC)

7.8.1 Introduction

7.8.2 Core Messages

7.1 Source Reduction

• Source reduction programs to be implemented and implementation

schedule.**

• Sectors to target**

• Materials to be addressed and methods to determine the categories of solid

waste to be diverted.**

• Capability and economic viability of the city/municipality in implementing the

program for this component.*

• Technical requirements for the ordinances and other formal actions to be

taken by the city/municipality. *

• Social impacts on stakeholders involved or affected.*

• Estimated diversion resulting from source reduction.**

Municipality of Maragusan 10-year SWM plan

7.2 Collection- Collection of segregated recyclable and compostable materials is the

responsibility of the barangay. Collection of mixed solid waste and residuals is

the responsibility of the city/municipality. The SWM plan should describe how

the city/municipality will coordinate collection activities with the barangay.* -

7.2.1 Overview

• Description of the strategy for collection, based on the projected

quantities of segregated bio-degradables and recyclables, and of

residual waste.**

• Description of collection process for each type of waste.*

• Types of collection vehicles, collection frequency, collection points,

and types of containers.*

• Entity responsible for providing collection for each type of waste,

and for each sector. *

7.2.2 Collection equipment

and routes

• Description of each generator type and

service area, and the particular

requirements for collection equipment.*

• Table listing current number of vehicles

(compaction vehicles and/or dump trucks)

and projection of additional vehicles or

equipment to be purchased by year. *

• Rationale for selection of the equipment.*

7.2.3 Private collection service

• If collection service will be conducted by

private haulers, provide a rationale for

contracting out the service.*

• Listing of service areas, types of waste to

be collected, location where waste will be

taken. *

• Discussion of basic terms of contract.*

7.2.4 Storage and setout

• Types of containers to be used for each

generator type and service area, and rationale

for selection of types of containers.*

• Setout requirements (i.e., placement, time of

day, etc.).*

WASTE CLASSIFICATION CHARACTERIZATION Bag or Bin Labels/Tags

1. Biodegradable/ Compostable Waste

Waste which can be broken down to harmless or non-poisonous substances by the action of micro-organisms are called biodegradable waste such as plants, fruits and vegetables, leaves, twigs, soiled or wet paper and wood.

Biodegradable*

Green Color Code (recommended)

2. Recyclable Waste Any waste material retrieved from the waste stream and free from contamination that can still be converted into suitable beneficial use or for other purposes, including, but not limited to plastics, paper, iron and steel, aluminum, tins, glass, bottles and cans.

Recyclable*

Blue Color Code (recommended)

3. Residual Waste Non-biodegradable waste materials that have no beneficial use.

Residual*

Black Color Code (recommended)

4. Special Waste**

4.a Toxic and Hazardous Waste (THW)

Harmful to human health and the environment or is difficult to handle such as containers of paint, thinner, pesticides and similar chemicals, busted or broken fluorescent lamps and bulbs, household/dry cell batteries, consumer electronics such as cell phones and batteries, mercury-containing thermometers, etc. or any other items to be identified under RA 6969

THW

Red Color Code (recommended)

4.b Household Health Care Waste (HHCW)

Syringes, cotton swabs, wipes, bandages, condoms, used diapers, sanitary napkins and other infectious waste

Yellow container or HHCW tag or label (required)

4.c. Bulky Waste Waste materials which cannot be appropriately placed in separate containers because of either its bulky size, shape or other physical attributes. These include large worn-out or broken household, commercial and industrial items such as furniture, lamps, bookcases, filing cabinets and other similar items.

5. Construction and demolition waste

Debris, wood, iron, spoils and others.

7.2.5 Segregated recyclables

• Strategy for implementing segregated collection

of recyclables in each of the barangays.*

• Types of materials to include types of vehicles,

collection frequency, types of containers.*

• Assistance the city/municipality will provide to

the barangay.*

7.2.6 Segregated compostables

• Strategy for implementing segregated collection

of compostables in each of the barangays.**

• Types of materials to include types of vehicles,

collection frequency, types of containers.*

• Assistance the city/municipality will provide to

the barangay.*

7.2.7 Mixed solid

waste/residuals

• Plan for collecting residuals.**

• Table listing type of collection vehicle, capacity, and collection

frequency by year for 5 years. In preparing table, consideration

should be given to the quantities of waste requiring collection and

disposal as diversion programs are implemented.*

• Types of containers that may be used for setout.*

• Plan for increasing coverage area to provide collection service to all

parts of the city/municipality (if applicable).*


- Segregation and recycling and composting of segregated materials are the

responsibility of the barangay. The SWM plan should describe how the

city/municipality will work with the barangay to implement the programs.*-

7.3.1 Segregation

• Strategy for promoting segregation in each of the barangays.**

• Strategies for start-up, implementation, monitoring, and enforcement.**

• Assistance the city/municipality will provide to the barangay.*

7.3.2 Recycling

• Strategy for implementing MRFs in each of the barangays or in clusters of

barangays.**

• Strategies for start-up, implementation, monitoring, and enforcement.**

• Materials to be recycled, methods of determining categories of recyclable waste for

diversion *

• Existing capacity, future demand, and how the capacity will be met (e.g., new

facilities and expansion of existing facilities)*

• Assistance the city/municipality will provide to the barangay.*

• Implementation schedule.**

• Acceptable technologies and lay-out of facilities.*


7.3.3 Composting/ Management of Biodegradable Waste

– Overall strategy for managing biodegradable waste.**

– Quantity of waste, by barangay, to be composted. *

– Existing capacity, future demand, and how the capacity will be met (e.g., new

facilities and expansion of existing facilities).*

– Strategies for start-up, implementation, monitoring, and enforcement.**

– Materials to be composted, methods of determining categories of biodegradable

waste for diversion *

– Acceptable technologies and layouts of composting facilities.*

– Assistance city/municipality will provide to the barangay.*

– Implementation schedule.**

Materials Recovery Facility

1. Eco-Center at San Carlos City, Negros Occidental

Final Segregation of “non-biodegradable wastes” at the MRF



Processing of “biodegradable wastes”

ADOPT A MateriaL Recovery Facility


7.3.4 Marketing and Market Development

• Estimated prices for recovered materials and average selling price/average

price.*

• Evaluation of feasibility of procurement preferences for compost, recyclable and

recycled materials by city/municipality. *

• Strategies for developing and expanding markets for composts, recyclables,

recycled and other processed materials.**

• Evaluation of the feasibility of procurement preferences to encourage the

purchase of products made from recycled material and compost.*

7.4 Transfer (if applicable)

– Strategy for use of transfer facilities.*

– Existing capacity, future demand, and how the capacity will be

met (e.g., new facilities and expansion of existing facilities).*

– Locations for new facilities, types and quantities of waste that will

be accepted, source of waste, and destination of waste.*

– Description of transfer station design and operations.*

– Strategies for start-up, implementation, monitoring, and

enforcement.*

– Implementation schedule.*

7.5 Alternative Technologies

for Residual Wastes

• Description of technology, capacity etc.**

• Options for the Cities/Municipalities to utilize

alternative technologies for the residual wastes.*

• Proof of Environmental Technology Verification

from DOST (if any).*

7.6 Disposal - Disposal plan for 10-years including identification of prospective sites

for future use. Include plans for upgrading or closing existing facilities to

meet requirement for sanitary landfills. -

7.6.1 SW Disposal Capacity

• Projection of the amount of disposal capacity needed to accommodate

residual wastes, by year for a 10-year period.**

• Comparison of existing disposal capacity with capacity requirements.*

• Description of overall plan for disposal, by year.*

7.6.2 Existing Facilities

• For open and controlled dumps provide closure and rehabilitation plan

based on DAO 9 Series of 2006 or Authority to Close (ATC) issued by EMB

regional office.**

• For SLF, strategies to extend life span and capacity of the existing disposal

site.**

7.6 Disposal

7.6.3 New Facilities

• Description of the Categorized Disposal

Facility (if applicable).

• Explanation of how the design will meet

the requirements of RA 9003.

7.6.4 Categorized Disposal Facilities

(Sanitary Landfill) Design

• Demonstration that the capacity will be

adequate for a minimum of 5 years based

7.7 Special Wastes

• Plan for storage, collection, treatment, disposal and other

appropriate technologies for any special wastes as referred to 3.8**

• Estimated quantities of special wastes to be generated in the

future.**

7.7.1 Health Care Wastes

• Plan for treatment and disposal as referred to 3.8.1**

• Estimated quantities of special wastes to be generated in the

future.**

RA 9003

RA6969

RA 9003 vis-à-vis RA 6969

Toxic

Substances and

Hazardous and

Nuclear Waste

Control Act of

1990


- Purpose and content of information dissemination, education and

communication program -

7.8.1 Introduction

• Discussion of strategy including need for public education and involvement.**

• Problems/issues that will be addressed.**

• Purpose of IEC activities (i.e., information dissemination, education, motivation, advocacy).**

• Audiences that will be targeted e.g. Brgy. Officials, Schools, etc.**

7.8.2 Core Messages

• Discussion of core message(s) for each target audience. *

• Explanation of how message will be coordinated with other agencies.**

• Description of how IEC activities will support solid waste management program activities, e.g.,

source reduction, litter prevention, segregation, recycling, and composting.**


7.8.3 Approach

• Discussion of approach (es) for each target audience. **

• Matrix of planned activities. Include: purpose, target audience,

subject of message, method, responsible party, and monitoring

plan.**

• Implementation schedule. IEC activities should be integrated with

infrastructure and should be on-going.**

• Cost of activities (to be incorporated into financial plan (see Section

11).**

End of presentation

CHAPTER 8.

IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

8.1 Framework

• Overview of each program to be implemented, generator segment, by year. Include source reduction, recycling, management of biodegradables, disposal and alternative technologies.**

Note: *nice to have

**must have


Plan

8. 2 Diversion Projections

• Table of types and percentages of materials to be diverted to meet the mandated diversion requirement.**

Note: *nice to have

**must have

Year Waste

Gen/Capit

a/day with

of

2%/annu

m based

on WACS

(kg/day)

Project

Pop.

Daily

Waste

Gen.

based on

Populatio

n (kg/day)

Waste

Div.

Target

(%)

Weight

to be

Diverted

(kg/day)

Target

Residual

Target

Disp.

(kg/day)

WACS

Bio

(56.31%)

kg/day

Recyclabl

e(16.15%)

(kg/day)

Selected

Residual

(15.30%)

(kg/day)

‘15 0.240 40,652 9,756.48 87.76 8,562.3 12.24 1,194.2 5,493.9 1,575.7 1,492.7

‘16 0.245 41,179 10,080.6 87.76 8,846.8 12.24 1,233.9 5,676.4 1,628.0 1,542.3

‘17 0.250 41,704 10,413.3 87.76 9,138.7 12.24 1,274.6 5,863.7 1,681.8 1,593.2

‘18 0.255 41,704 10,759.6 87.76 9,442.7 12.24 1,317 6,058.8 1,737.9 1,646.2

‘19 0.260 42,246 11,116.4 90.26 10,034 9.74 1,082.3 6,259.7 1,795.3 1,700.8


8.3 Monitoring Program

• Description of monitoring program to provide accurate information and to show whether or not policies are succeeding and to monitor the performance of the SWM plan.**

Note: *nice to have

**must have

8.4 Incentive Programs

• Description of program providing for incentives (rewards, grants, fiscal incentives and non-fiscal Incentives) that will be provided to concerned sectors in order to encourage wide participation in the implementation of the plan.*

Note: *nice to have

**must have

CHAPTER 9. INSTITUTIONAL

ASPECTS

Annotated Outline

Chapter 9: Institutional AspectsPlanned structure for the implementation of plan

9.1 Roles

• Future roles of the city SWM Board, the city, barangay, private entities and

institutions as generators, citizens, NGOs and recycling companies.*

• Strategy for cooperation with the city/municipal SWM Board.*

• Coordination with other entities (e.g., barangays, NGOs, business leaders).*

9.2 Legal

• Recommended changes to city structure.*

• Zoning and building code changes.*

• Plans to impose penal provisions *

• Other legal requirements.*

** Must have *Nice to have

CHAPTER 10. SOCIAL AND

ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS

Annotated Outline

Chapter 10: Social and Environmental AspectsDiscussion of social and environmental issues related development of

full-scale infrastructure (if there’s any).

10.1 Social Aspects

• Significant social impacts (both positive and negative) from community-based SWM.*

• Social acceptability of proposed solid waste system (including collection system and

processing and disposal sites.*

• Discussion of requirements of stakeholders.*

• Discussion of conditions concerning waste pickers at the disposal site and what the

city/municipality can do to improve their conditions.*

10.2 Environmental Aspects

• Discussion of environmental aspects of the proposed solid waste system.*

• Environmental review requirements.*


CHAPTER 11. COST

ESTIMATED/FINANCIAL

ASPECTS

11.1 Investment cost

• Breakdown of estimated investment cost by year for 5 years, by

private and public sectors. Investment costs should address each

component of the solid waste system, i.e., collection, transfer

stations, MRFs, composting facilities, and disposal facilities.**

• Facility costs to include engineering and infrastructure.*

• Equipment costs to include stationary equipment (e.g., shredder)

and rolling equipment (e.g., collection vehicles)*

• Estimated cost to be amortized based on life expectancy of

facility/equipment.*


Detailed Cost EstimatesCapital Outlay: Vehicles and Equipment, 2008-2017

Item and Description 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total

Segregation and Source Reduction

Drop Off Containers for Recyclables -

Sub-Total - - - - - - - - - - -

Collection and Transport -

Truck -Leyland -

Waste Dumptruck 500,000 500,000

Dumptruck 500,000 500,000

Sound system (public market) 30,000 30,000 60,000

Sub-total - 30,000 530,000 - 500,000 - - - - - 1,060,000

Materials Recovery -

Weighing Scales 30,000 30,000

Sifter 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 4,000

Sub-total - - 31,000 - 1,000 - 1,000 - 1,000 - 34,000

Disposal Management -

Backhoe -

Bulldozer -

Mower (Landscaping) 20,000 30,000 50,000

Shredding Machine 300,000 300,000

Sub-total - 20,000 - - 30,000 - - - - - 50,000

Program Management -

Computer System - laptop 70,000 70,000 140,000

Printer 11,500 11,500

Sub-total 81,500 - - - - - - 70,000 - - 151,500

TOTAL 81,500 50,000 561,000 - 531,000 - 1,000 70,000 1,000 - 1,595,500

11.2 Annual Costs

• Breakdown of annual costs by year for 5 years, by private and public

sector.**

• Labor cost, including fringes, by labor category.*

• Administrative costs including insurance, office expense, etc.*

• Operating and maintenance costs including fuel, repair, supplies,

etc.*

• Amortized investment cost (if any)*

• Loan repayment schedule (if any)*


Personal Expenses, 2008-2017

Itemized Personnel Positions 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total

Segregation at Source

Laborer - - - - - - - - -

Sub-total - - - - - - - - - - -

Collection and Transport - - - - - - - - - -

1-SWM coordinator () 72,336 72,336 72,336 168,000 168,000 168,000 168,000 168,000 168,000 1,225,008

Driver 72,336 144,672 144,672 144,672 144,672 280,000 280,000 280,000 280,000 1,771,024

Laborers 121,968 121,968 243,936 243,936 243,936 243,936 243,936 243,936 243,936 243,936 2,195,424

Sub-total 121,968 266,640 460,944 460,944 556,608 556,608 691,936 691,936 691,936 691,936 5,191,456

Materials Recovery

Sorters/Composters 121,968 121,968 182,952 182,952 182,952 182,952 182,952 182,952 182,952 1,524,600

Sub-total - 121,968 121,968 182,952 182,952 182,952 182,952 182,952 182,952 182,952 1,524,600

Disposal Management

Disposal Facility In-Charge - 1 72,336 72,336 72,336 72,336 72,336 72,336 72,336 72,336 72,336 72,336 723,360

Sub-total 72,336 72,336 72,336 72,336 72,336 72,336 72,336 72,336 72,336 72,336 723,360

Program Management

General Management

1-Office staff 72,336 72,336 110,000 110,000 110,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 1,074,672

Public Services Enforcer-1 72,336 72,336 72,336 72,336 72,336 72,336 72,336 72,336 72,336 651,024

Sub-total 72,336 144,672 182,336 182,336 182,336 192,336 192,336 192,336 192,336 192,336 1,725,696

Total 266,640 605,616 837,584 898,568 994,232 1,004,232 1,139,560 1,139,560 1,139,560 1,139,560 9,165,112

Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses, 2008-2017

Expense Item 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total

Collection

Fuel 85,000 150,000 250,000 300,000 300,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 2,835,000

Vehicle maintenance/spare parts 35,000 50,000 50,000 80,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 100,000 150,000 150,000 855,000

Insurance, registration 17,000 17,000 17,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 331,000

Bukag 4,320 4,320 4,320 4,320 4,320 4,320 4,320 4,320 4,320 4,320 43,200

Protective gear & supplies 1,620 1,620 1,620 1,620 1,620 1,620 1,620 1,620 1,620 14,580

Sub-total 141,320 222,940 322,940 425,940 405,940 475,940 495,940 495,940 545,940 545,940 4,078,780

Materials Recovery

MRF Supplies & Materials 10,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 25,000 25,000 165,000

Building and grounds maintenance - - - - -

Utilities (electricity, water) 12,000 12,000 12,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 165,000

Sub-total - 22,000 27,000 27,000 33,000 38,000 38,000 45,000 50,000 50,000 330,000

Disposal Management

Fuel and lubricants & maintenance 30,000 30,000 30,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 480,000

Sampling and analysis of ground

water8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 72,000

Services (pre-development activities) -

- topo & detailed engineering 25,000 25,000 50,000

Sub-total 25,000 63,000 38,000 38,000 58,000 58,000 58,000 88,000 88,000 88,000 602,000

Program Management

Equipment maintenance (computers) 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 40,000

Office supplies and materials 20,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 260,000

IEC materials 25,000 25,000 25,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 135,000

Meetings (e.g., ESWM Board) 12,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 210,000

Staff training 10,000 15,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 165,000

Sub-total 12,000 78,000 93,000 98,000 89,000 89,000 89,000 84,000 89,000 89,000 810,000

Total 178,320 385,940 480,940 588,940 585,940 660,940 680,940 712,940 772,940 772,940 5,820,780

11.3 Funding Options

• Discussion of options to finance the capital investments, e.g., loans

from financial institutions, central government grants, and municipal

funds. (if any)**

– IRA

– PSP (Private Sector Participation)

– National Government Grants

– Loans

• Bilateral

• Multilateral

• DBP

• LBP

• MDFO

• Discussion of options to finance recurring cost **

– local taxes

– intergovernmental transfers

– user charges.


11.3 Funding Options

• Presentation of existing and projected sources of revenues. Include

consideration of

– revenues from collection of fees;

– outside sources of funds,

– collection and use of fines, and

– sources for the local SWM fund and their uses.**

• Specific projects, activities, equipment and technological

requirement for which outside sourcing of funds or materials as may

be necessary.*

• Breakdown of revenues by year for 5 years, and by source.*


ESWM Revenues by revenue category

ESWM

RevenuesTotal 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

SWM Fees

from

Households

16,470,900 52,110 237,060 431,730 1,063,800 1,423,800 1,801,8002,207,25

0

2,632,95

0

3,077,5

50

3,542,8

50

SWM Fees

from

Establishments

2,573,736 215,400 217,554 219,730 266,312 268,975 271,665 274,382 277,126 279,897 282,696

Total 19,044,636 267,510 454,614 651,460 1,330,112 1,692,775 2,073,4652,481,63

2

2,910,07

6

3,357,4

47

3,825,5

46

Table __. ESWM Revenues, by Revenue Category, 2008-2017

11.4 Cost Evaluation and Comparison

– Cost for waste management per service capita.*

– Cost for waste management by unit weight for each type of

service, e.g., collection, processing, and disposal.*

– Comparison of costs for each component of the solid waste

management system.*

– Discussion of ways to optimize costs.*


11.5 Summary

• Tabular summary of investment costs, annual costs, and annual

revenues by year.**


ESWM Plan Ten-Year Financing Requirements, 2008-2017

Cost Items TOTAL 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Investment

Costs7,358,500 429,500 1,625,000 1,481,000 160,000 1,131,000 1,060,000 651,000 320,000 651,000 150,000

Personal

Expenses9,165,112 266,640 605,616 837,584 898,568 994,232 1,004,232 1,139,560 1,139,560 1,139,560 1,139,560

MOOEs 5,820,780 178,320 385,940 480,940 588,940 585,940 660,940 680,940 712,940 772,940 772,940

TOTAL 22,644,392 874,460 2,616,556 2,799,524 1,647,508 2,711,172 2,725,172 2,471,500 2,172,500 2,563,500 2,062,500

CHAPTER 12. PLAN

IMPLEMENTATION

12.1 Phases and Responsibilities

– Discussion of phases from the development of a plan to guide the

operation and the implementing agency or persons/groups

responsible.**

12.2 Milestones

– Milestones in implementation of the institutional/legal aspects of

the plan including: public hearings, final approval of plan, and

establishment of the SW Division.**


– Milestones in implementation of the solid waste system described in

the plan including: source reduction activities, segregated collection

in each barangay, establishment of MRFs and composting facilities,

upgrade/closure of dumpsites, establishment of sanitary landfills,

IEC activities, enforcement activities, etc.**

• 12.3 Implementation Schedule

– Tables or diagrams showing the schedule of implementation.**

– Schedule should include all of the programs discussed in Section

7.**

– Table summarizing diversion goals and quantities.**


The National Solid Waste Management Commission

Office of the Secretariat, EMB-DENR

Telefax : +632 920 2252/2279

Website : www.emb.gov.ph/nswmc

Chapter 1. Introductionrsucivilengineering.weebly.com/uploads/7/7/6/4/77644974/final... ·...

Documents

Transcript of Chapter 1. Introductionrsucivilengineering.weebly.com/uploads/7/7/6/4/77644974/final... ·...