1

Take a look at Maps 1 and 2. Map 1 was made in1154 CE. by the Arab geographer al-Idrisi. The

section reproduced here is a detail of the Indiansubcontinent from his larger map of the world. Map 2was made in the 1720s by a French cartographercartographercartographercartographercartographer. Thetwo maps are quite different even though they are ofthe same area. In al-Idrisi’s map, south India is wherewe would expect to find north India and Sri Lanka isthe island at the top. Place-names are marked in Arabic,

CartographerCartographerCartographerCartographerCartographerA person whomakes maps.

1TRACING CHANGES THROUGHA THOUSAND YEARS

Map 1Map 1Map 1Map 1Map 1A section of the worldmap drawn by thegeographer al-Idrisi inthe twelfth centuryshowing the Indiansubcontinent.

TRACING CHANGES...

2OUR PASTS — II

and there are some well-known names like Kanauj inUttar Pradesh (spelt in the map as Qanauj). Map 2 wasmade nearly 600 years after the first, during which timeinformation about the subcontinent had changedconsiderably. This map seems more familiar to us andthe coastal areas in particular are surprisingly detailed.This map was used by European sailors and merchantson their voyages (see Chapter 6). But look at the areasinland.

Are they as detailed as those on the coast? Follow thecourse of the River Ganga and see how it is shown. Whydo you think there is a difference in the level of detailand accuracy between the coastal and inland areas inthis map?

Map 2Map 2Map 2Map 2Map 2The subcontinent, fromthe early-eighteenthcentury Atlas Nouveauof Guillaume de l’Isle.

?

3

Equally important is the fact that the science ofcartography differed in the two periods. When historiansread documents, maps and texts from the past theyhave to be sensitive to the different historicalbackgrounds – the contexts – in which informationabout the past was produced.

New and old terminologiesIf the context in which information is producedchanges with time, what about language andmeanings? Historical records exist in a variety oflanguages which have changed considerably over theyears. Medieval Persian, for example, is different frommodern Persian. The difference is not just with regardto grammar and vocabulary; the meanings of wordsalso change over time.

Take the term “Hindustan”, for example. Today weunderstand it as “India”, the modern nation state. Whenthe term was used in the thirteenth century by Minhaj-iSiraj, a chronicler who wrote in Persian, he meant theareas of Punjab, Haryana and the lands between theGanga and Yamuna. He used the term in a politicalsense for lands that were a part of the dominions of theDelhi Sultan. The areas included in this term shiftedwith the extent of the Sultanate but the term neverincluded south India within it. By contrast, in the earlysixteenth century Babur used Hindustan to describethe geography, the fauna and the culture of theinhabitants of the subcontinent. As we will see later inthe chapter, this was somewhat similar to the way thefourteenth-century poet Amir Khusrau used the word“Hind”. While the idea of a geographical and culturalentity like “India” did exist, the term Hindustan didnot carry the political and national meanings which weassociate with it today.

Historians have to be careful about the terms theyuse because they meant different things in the past.Take, for example, a simple term like “foreigner”. It isused today to mean someone who is not an Indian. In

Can you think ofany other wordswhose meaningschange in differentcontexts?

?

TRACING CHANGES...

4OUR PASTS — II

the medieval period a “foreigner” was any stranger whoappeared say in a given village, someone who was nota part of that society or culture. (In Hindi the termpardesi might be used to describe such a person andin Persian, ajnabi.) A city-dweller, therefore, might haveregarded a forest-dweller as a “foreigner”, but twopeasants living in the same village were not foreignersto each other, even though they may have had differentreligious or caste backgrounds.

Historians and their sourcesHistorians use different types of sources to learn aboutthe past depending upon the period of their study andthe nature of their investigation. Last year, for example,you read about rulers of the Gupta dynasty andHarshavardhana. In this book we will read about thefollowing thousand years, from roughly 700 to 1750 CE.

You will notice some continuity in the sources usedby historians for the study of this period. They still relyupon coins, inscriptions, architecture and textual recordsfor information. But there is also considerablediscontinuity. The number and variety of textual recordsincreased dramatically during this period. They slowlydisplaced other types of available information. Throughthis period paper gradually became cheaper and more

The value of paperCompare the following

(1) In the middle of the thirteenth century a scholarwanted to copy a book. He did not have enough paper.So he washed the writing off a manuscript he did notwant, dried the paper and used it.

(2) A century later, if you bought some food in themarket you could be lucky and have the shopkeeperwrap it for you in some paper.

When was paper more expensive and easily available— in the thirteenth or the fourteenth century??

5

widely available. People used it to write holy texts,chronicles of rulers, letters and teachings of saints,petitions and judicial records, and for registers ofaccounts and taxes. Manuscripts were collected bywealthy people, rulers, monasteries and temples. Theywere placed in libraries and archivesarchivesarchivesarchivesarchives. These manuscriptsand documents provide a lot of detailed information tohistorians but they are also difficult to use.

There was no printing press in those days so scribescopied manuscripts by hand. If you have ever copied afriend’s homework you would know that this is not asimple exercise. Sometimes you cannot read yourfriend’s handwriting and are forced to guess what iswritten. As a result there are small but significantdifferences in your copy of your friend’s work.Manuscript copying is somewhat similar. As scribescopied manuscripts, they also introduced small changes— a word here, a sentence there. These small differencesgrew over centuries of copying until manuscripts of the

ArchiveArchiveArchiveArchiveArchiveA place wheredocuments andmanuscripts arestored. Today allnational and stategovernments havearchives wherethey keep all theirold official recordsand transactions.

Fig. 1A painting of a scribemaking a copy of amanuscript. Thispainting is only10.5 cm by 7.1 cm insize. Because of itssize it is called aminiature. Miniaturepaintings weresometimes used toillustrate the texts ofmanuscripts. Theywere so beautiful thatlater collectors oftentook the manuscriptsapart and sold just theminiatures.

TRACING CHANGES...

6OUR PASTS — II

same text became substantially different from oneanother. This is a serious problem because we rarelyfind the original manuscript of the author today. Weare totally dependent upon the copies made by laterscribes. As a result historians have to read differentmanuscript versions of the same text to guess what theauthor had originally written.

On occasion authors revised their chronicles atdifferent times. The fourteenth-century chroniclerZiyauddin Barani wrote his chronicle first in 1356 andanother version two years later. The two differ from eachother but historians did not know about the existenceof the first version until 1971. It remained lost in largelibrary collections.

New social and political groupsThe study of the thousand years between 700 and 1750is a huge challenge to historians largely because of thescale and variety of developments that occurred overthe period. At different moments in this period newtechnologies made their appearance — like the Persian

Fig. 2Different kinds ofhandwriting couldmake the reading ofPersian and Arabicdifficult. The nastaliqstyle (on the left) iscursive and easy toread, the shikaste (onthe right) is denser andmore difficult.

7

wheel in irrigation, the spinning wheel in weaving, andfirearms in combat. New foods and beverages arrivedin the subcontinent: potatoes, corn, chillies, tea andcoffee. Remember that all these innovations – newtechnologies and crops – came along with people, whobrought other ideas with them as well. As a result, thiswas a period of economic, political, social and culturalchanges. You will learn about some of these changesin Chapters 5, 6 and 7.

This was also a period of great mobility. Groups ofpeople travelled long distances in search of opportunity.The subcontinent held immense wealth and thepossibilities for people to carve a fortune. One group ofpeople who became important in this period were theRajputs, a name derived from “Rajaputra”, the son of aruler. Between the eighth and fourteenth centuries theterm was applied more generally to a body of warriorswho claimed Kshatriya caste status. The term included Fig. 3

The Persian wheel.

TRACING CHANGES...

8OUR PASTS — II

?

not just rulers and chieftains but also soldiers andcommanders who served in the armies of differentmonarchs all over the subcontinent. A chivalric code ofconduct – extreme valour and a great sense of loyalty –were the qualities attributed to Rajputs by their poetsand bards. Other groups of people such as theMarathas, Sikhs, Jats, Ahoms and Kayasthas (a casteof scribes and secretaries) also used the opportunitiesof the age to become politically important.

Throughout this period there was a gradual clearingof forests and the extension of agriculture, a changefaster and more complete in some areas than in others.Changes in their habitathabitathabitathabitathabitat forced many forest-dwellersto migrate. Others started tilling the land and becamepeasants. These new peasant groups gradually beganto be influenced by regional markets, chieftains, priests,monasteries and temples. They became part of largecomplex societies, and were required to pay taxes andoffer goods and services to local lords. As a result,significant economic and social differences emergedamongst peasants. Some possessed more productiveland, others also kept cattle, and some combinedartisanal work with agricultural activity during the leanseason. As society became more differentiated, peoplewere grouped into jatis or sub-castes and ranked onthe basis of their backgrounds and their occupations.Ranks were not fixed permanently, and varied accordingto the power, influence and resources controlled bymembers of the jati. The status of the same jati couldvary from area to area.

Jatis framed their own rules and regulations tomanage the conduct of their members. These regulationswere enforced by an assembly of elders, described insome areas as the jati panchayat. But jatis were alsorequired to follow the rules of their villages. Severalvillages were governed by a chieftain. Together they wereonly one small unit of a state.

Of thetechnological,economic, socialand culturalchangesdescribed in thissection, which doyou think weremost significant inthe town or villagein which you live?

HabitatHabitatHabitatHabitatHabitatRefers to theenvironment of aregion and thesocial andeconomic lifestyleof its residents.

9

Region and empireLarge states like those of the Cholas (Chapter 2),Tughluqs (Chapter 3) or Mughals (Chapter 4)encompassed many regions. A Sanskrit prashasti (seeChapter 2 for an example of a prashasti) praising theDelhi Sultan Ghiyasuddin Balban (1266-87) explainedthat he was the ruler of a vast empire that stretchedfrom Bengal (Gauda) in the east to Ghazni (Gajjana) inAfghanistan in the west and included all of south India(Dravida). People of different regions – Gauda, Andhra,Kerala, Karnataka, Maharashtra and Gujarat – apparentlyfled before his armies. Historians regard these as

Map 3Map 3Map 3Map 3Map 3Provinces of the DelhiSultanate duringMuhammad Tughluq’sreign according to theEgyptian sourceMasalik al-Absar fiMamalik al-Amsar ofShihabuddin Umari.

TRACING CHANGES...

10OUR PASTS — II

? exaggerated claims of conquests. At the same time, theytry to understand why rulers kept claiming to havecontrol over different parts of the subcontinent.

Language and regionIn 1318 the poet Amir Khusrau noted that there was

“a different language in every region of this land: Sindhi,Lahori, Kashmiri, Dvarsamudri (in southern Karnataka),Telangani (in Andhra Pradesh), Gujari (in Gujarat), Ma‘bari(in Tamil Nadu), Gauri, (in Bengal) … Awadhi (in easternUttar Pradesh) and Hindawi (in the area around Delhi)”.

Amir Khusrau went on to explain that in contrast to theselanguages there was Sanskrit which did not belong toany region. It was an old language and “common peopledo not know it, only the Brahmanas do”.

Make a list of the languages mentioned by Amir Khusrau.Prepare another list of the names of languages spokentoday in the regions he mentioned: underline names thatare similar and circle those that are different.

Did you notice that the names by which languagesare known have changed over time?

By 700 many regions already possessed distinctgeographical dimensions and their own language andcultural characteristics. You will learn more about thesein Chapter 9. They were also associated with specificruling dynasties. There was considerable conflictbetween these states. Occasionally dynasties like theCholas, Khaljis, Tughluqs and Mughals were able tobuild an empire that was pan-regional – spanningdiverse regions. Not all these empires were equallystable or successful. Compare, for example, Tables 1in Chapters 3 and 4. What was the duration of rule ofthe Khalji and Mughal dynasties?

?

Why do you thinkrulers made suchclaims?

11

?

?

When the Mughal Empire declined in the eighteenthcentury, it led to the re-emergence of regional states(Chapter 10). But years of imperial, pan-regional rulehad altered the character of the regions. Across mostof the subcontinent the regions were left with the legaciesof the big and small states that ruled over them. Thiswas apparent in the emergence of many distinct andshared traditions: in the realms of governance, themanagement of the economy, elite cultures, andlanguage. Through the thousand years between 700and 1750 the character of the different regions did notgrow in isolation. They felt the impact of largerpan-regional forces of integration without ever quitelosing their distinctiveness.

Old and new religionsThe thousand years of history that we are exploringwitnessed major developments in religious traditions.People’s belief in the divine was sometimes deeplypersonal, but more usually it was collective. Collectivebelief in a supernatural agency – religion – was oftenclosely connected with the social and economicorganisation of local communities. As the social worldsof these groups altered so too did their beliefs.

It was during this period that important changesoccurred in what we call Hinduism today. Theseincluded the worship of new deities, the constructionof temples by royalty and the growing importance ofBrahmanas, the priests, as dominant groups in society.

Their knowledge of Sanskrit texts earned theBrahmanas a lot of respect in society. Their dominantposition was consolidated by the support of theirpatronspatronspatronspatronspatrons — new rulers searching for prestige.

One of the major developments was the emergenceof the idea of bhakti — of a loving, personal deity thatdevotees could reach without the aid of priests orelaborate rituals. You will be learning about this, andother traditions, in Chapter 8.

Find out whetherand for how longyour state waspart of these pan-regional empires.

Do you rememberwhat Amir Khusrauhad to sayregarding Sanskrit,knowledge andBrahmanas ?

PatronPatronPatronPatronPatronAn influential,wealthy individualwho supportsanother person –an artiste,a craftsperson,a learned man, ora noble.

TRACING CHANGES...

12OUR PASTS — II

This was also the period when new religionsappeared in the subcontinent. Merchants and migrantsfirst brought the teachings of the holy Quran to Indiain the seventh century. Muslims regard the Quran astheir holy book and accept the sovereignty of the oneGod, Allah, whose love, mercy and beauty embrace allthose who believe in Him, without regard to socialbackground.

Many rulers were patrons of Islam and the ulama –learned theologians and jurists. And like Hinduism,Islam was interpreted in a variety of ways by itsfollowers. There were the Shia Muslims who believedthat the Prophet’s son-in-law, Ali, was the legitimateleader of the Muslim community and the Sunni Muslimswho accepted the authority of the early leaders (khalifas)of the community, and the succeeding Khalifas. Therewere other important differences between the variousschools of law (Hanafi and Shafi’i mainly in India), andin theology and mystic traditions.

Thinking about time and historicalperiodsHistorians do not see time just as a passing of hours,days or years – as a clock or a calendar. Time alsoreflects changes in social and economic organisation,in the persistence and transformation of ideas andbeliefs. The study of time is made somewhat easier bydividing the past into large segments – periods – thatpossess shared characteristics.

In the middle of the nineteenth century Britishhistorians divided the history of India into three periods:“Hindu”, “Muslim” and “British”. This division wasbased on the idea that the religion of rulers was theonly important historical change, and that there wereno other significant developments – in the economy,society or culture. Such a division also ignored the richdiversity of the subcontinent.

13

Few historians follow this periodisation today. Mostlook to economic and social factors to characterise themajor elements of different moments of the past. Thehistories you read last year included a wide range ofearly societies – hunter-gatherers, early farmers, peopleliving in towns and villages, and early empires andkingdoms. The histories you will be studying this yearare often described as “medieval”. You will find out moreabout the spread of peasant societies, the rise of regionaland imperial state formations — sometimes at the costof pastoral and forest people — the development ofHinduism and Islam as major religions and the arrivalof European trading companies.

These thousand years of Indian history witnessedconsiderable change. After all, the sixteenth andeighteenth centuries were quite different from the eighthor the eleventh. Therefore, describing the entire periodas one historical unit is not without its problems.Moreover, the “medieval” period is often contrasted withthe “modern” period. “Modernity” carries with it a senseof material progress and intellectual advancement. Thisseems to suggest that the medieval period was lackingin any change whatsoever. But of course we know thiswas not the case.

During these thousand years the societies of thesubcontinent were transformed often and economiesin several regions reached a level of prosperity thatattracted the interest of European trading companies.As you read this book, look out for signs of change andthe historical processes at work. Also, whenever youcan, try and compare what you read in this book withwhat you read last year. Look out for changes andcontinuities wherever you can, and look at the worldaround you to see what else has changed or remainedthe same.

TRACING CHANGES...

14OUR PASTS — II

ImagineImagineImagineImagineImagine

You are a historian. Choose one of thethemes mentioned in this chapter,such as economic, social or politicalhistory, and discuss why you think it

would be interesting to find out thehistory of that theme.

Let’s recallLet’s recallLet’s recallLet’s recallLet’s recall

1. Who was considered a “foreigner” in the past?

2. State whether true or false

(a) We do not find inscriptions for the period after700.

(b) The Marathas asserted their political importanceduring this period.

(c) Forest-dwellers were sometimes pushed out oftheir lands with the spread of agriculturalsettlements.

(d) Sultan Ghiyasuddin Balban controlled Assam,Manipur and Kashmir.

3. Fill in the blanks

(a) Archives are places where ——————— arekept.

(b) ——————was a fourteenth-century chronicler.

(c) ——, ———, ———, ——— and ——— weresome of the new crops introduced into thesubcontinent during this period.

4. List some of the technological changes associated withthis period.

KEYWORDS

manuscript

jati

region

periodisation

15

5. What were some of the major religious developmentsduring this period?

Let’s understandLet’s understandLet’s understandLet’s understandLet’s understand

6. In what ways has the meaning of the term “Hindustan”changed over the centuries?

7. How were the affairs of jatis regulated?

8. What does the term pan-regional empire mean?

Let’s discussLet’s discussLet’s discussLet’s discussLet’s discuss

9. What are the difficulties historians face in usingmanuscripts?

10. How do historians divide the past into periods? Dothey face any problems in doing so?

Let’s doLet’s doLet’s doLet’s doLet’s do

11. Compare either Map 1 or Map 2 with the present-daymap of the subcontinent, listing as many similaritiesand differences you can find.

12. Find out where records are kept in your village orcity. Who writes these records? Is there an archive?Who manages it? What kinds of documents are storedthere? Who are the people who use it?

TRACING CHANGES...