Dumb Money, Smart Money: Funding and Publishing Options for Independent Game Developers
Changing the game with digital money · 2020-02-04 · Restricted 2 Game plan Inefficiencies in...
Transcript of Changing the game with digital money · 2020-02-04 · Restricted 2 Game plan Inefficiencies in...
-
Restricted
Changing the game with digital money
Morten Bech, Head of CPMI Secretariat19 November 2019
-
Restricted 2
Game plan
Inefficiencies in money and payments: an emerging market perspective Central bank digital currencies as a solution The opportunistic bigtechs Concluding remarks
-
Restricted 3
Known inefficiencies in FMI: inclusion and cross-border payments
Cross-border retail payment arrangementsGlobal access (financial inclusion)
1 Respondents aged 15+ who report having an account (by themselves or together with someone else) at a bank or another type of financial institution or report personally using a mobile money service in the past 12 months. Sources: World Bank Global Findex Surveys 2011, 2014, and 2017;
0
20
40
60
2011 2014 2017
%
Adults with a bank account1
-
Restricted 4
Remittance volumes and costs are rising
…at still high average costs 1Decline in correspondent banking
75
80
85
90
95
100
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
%
Active corridorsActive correspondents
2
4
6
8
10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
%
BanksTraditional money transfer firmsFinancial technology firms
Remittances volumes are rising
1 Average total cost for sending $200; figure adapted from The Economist (2019).Sources: National Bank of Belgium; SWIFT BI Watch; The Economist (2019); World Bank, Remittance Prices Worldwide; World Bank; BIS calculations.
0
150
300
450
600
91 94 97 00 03 06 09 12 15 18
USD bn
World inflows
Placing a higher burden on emerging market economies that rely on remittances
-
Restricted
Game changerAre Central Bank Digital Currencies the solution?
5
-
Restricted 6
Central bank digital currencies
Source: Bech and Garratt, BIS Quarterly Review, September 2017, adapted by CPMI-MC report (2018).
-
Restricted 7
Design choices
Existing central bank money Central bank digital currencies
CashReserves and
settlement balances
General purposeWholesale only token
token accounts
24/7 availability () ()
Anonymity vis-à-vis central bank () ()
Peer-to-peer transfer () ()
Interest-bearing () () () ()
Limits or caps () () ()
= existing or likely feature, () = possible feature, = not typical or possible feature.
-
Restricted 8
CBDC for all
The potential positives:
Safer deposit account
Lower barrier to entry/improving inclusion
Easier negative rates
Better competition for customer deposits
Easier cross-border payments
The considerations:
Feasibility Mandate/legal Cyber risk AML/CFT Logistics
Financial intermediation bank deposits Impact banks’ business models and
lending
Financial stability quicker bank runs vs safe deposits
-
Restricted 9
Wholesale CBDC
Experiments to date result in systems that look broadly similar to, and not clearly superior to, existing RTGS
But there might be a role to play if RTGS are not yet developed
Higher risks – DLTs are largely untested
Higher reward?
More work and experimentation needed
-
Restricted
Financial pain could be bigtechs’ gain
10
-
Restricted 11
Big techs are increasingly moving into mobile payments
1 Venmo is a mobile payments app owned by PayPal that integrates social media features. It is popular among college students in the US. 2 Calibra is the mobile wallet that will run on top of the Libra network. 3 M-Pesa (M for mobile, pesa is Swahili for money) is a mobile phone-based money transfer, financing and microfinancing service, launched in 2007.
-
Restricted
The need for speed - the back-ends are improving
Sweden mobile payments take-offDiffusion of fast payments 1 Use of fast payments
1 The dashed part of the lines corresponds to projected implementation.Sources: Bech and Hobijn (2007); Bech, Shimizu and Wong (2017); CPMI Red Book Statistics; FIS (2018); national central banks; World Bank Group; IMF.
21
22
23
24
25
0
1
2
3
4
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
% of GDP % of GDP
Card payments (lhs)Cash in circulationSmartphone app (Swish)
0
35
70
105
140
0
20
40
60
80
80 85 90 95 00 05 10 15 20
Number %
RTGS systemsFast payment systems
Years (time scale)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Number of transactions per capita
ChileDenmarkIndia
NigeriaMalaysiaMexico
SingaporeSwedenUnited Kingdom
Years after implementation
-
Restricted 13
New potential entry – global stablecoins
Front-end Back-end
-
Restricted 14
Stablecoins – bringing cryptos closer to money
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Tether DAI Bitcoin1 Ether1
min-max rangemedian75th-25th percentile
1 Bitcoin nor Ether are ‘stablecoins’; they are included for reference.Sources: G7 WG Investigating the impact of global stablecoins (2019); Bullmann, D, J Klemm and A Pinna (2019).
A functional view of the stablecoin ecosystemVolatility
-
Restricted 15
A simple framework …
Reach Domestic Global
Paym
ents
infra
stru
ctur
e Overlay (Uses other
infrastructure to transact)
Stand alone
(Traditional infrastructure
and DLT)
1 Venmo is a mobile payments app owned by PayPal that integrates social media features. It is popular among college students in the US. 2 Calibra is the mobile wallet that will run on top of the Libra network. 3 M-Pesa (M for mobile, pesa is Swahili for money) is a mobile phone-based money transfer, financing and microfinancing service, launched in 2007.
P27
Reach
Domestic
Global
Payments infrastructure
Overlay
(Uses other infrastructure to transact)
Stand alone
(Traditional infrastructure and DLT)
-
Restricted 16
Hybrid - a ‘synthetic’ CBDC
Central Banks offer ‘eMoney’ providers access to their reserve accounts under a strict condition of 100% backing - IMF
‘Synthetic CBDC’ = Narrow banking Benefits:
Remove credit risk Retail services provided by private sector
Costs: Strict supervision required Reputation risk for Central Bank
-
Restricted
Concluding remarks
17
-
Restricted 18
Walk the talk
We need to improve the efficiency and inclusiveness of payment and financial services.
Central banks assess the relevance of issuing central bank digital currencies.
Public authorities consider most appropriate regulatory treatment of stablecoins and how existing regulatory frameworks can and should be applied.
The FSB and international standard-setting bodies assess how existing international principles and standards could be applied.
Maintain the high level of international coordination; ensure a level plaining field.
Changing the game with digital moneyGame planKnown inefficiencies in FMI: inclusion and cross-border paymentsRemittance volumes and costs are rising�Game changer�Are Central Bank Digital Currencies the solution?Central bank digital currenciesDesign choicesCBDC for allWholesale CBDCFinancial pain could be bigtechs’ gainBig techs are increasingly moving into mobile paymentsThe need for speed - the back-ends are improvingNew potential entry – global stablecoinsStablecoins – bringing cryptos closer to moneyA simple framework …Hybrid - a ‘synthetic’ CBDCConcluding remarksWalk the talk