Changing the game with digital money · 2020-02-04 · Restricted 2 Game plan Inefficiencies in...

18
Restricted Changing the game with digital money Morten Bech, Head of CPMI Secretariat 19 November 2019

Transcript of Changing the game with digital money · 2020-02-04 · Restricted 2 Game plan Inefficiencies in...

  • Restricted

    Changing the game with digital money

    Morten Bech, Head of CPMI Secretariat19 November 2019

  • Restricted 2

    Game plan

    Inefficiencies in money and payments: an emerging market perspective Central bank digital currencies as a solution The opportunistic bigtechs Concluding remarks

  • Restricted 3

    Known inefficiencies in FMI: inclusion and cross-border payments

    Cross-border retail payment arrangementsGlobal access (financial inclusion)

    1 Respondents aged 15+ who report having an account (by themselves or together with someone else) at a bank or another type of financial institution or report personally using a mobile money service in the past 12 months. Sources: World Bank Global Findex Surveys 2011, 2014, and 2017;

    0

    20

    40

    60

    2011 2014 2017

    %

    Adults with a bank account1

  • Restricted 4

    Remittance volumes and costs are rising

    …at still high average costs 1Decline in correspondent banking

    75

    80

    85

    90

    95

    100

    12 13 14 15 16 17 18

    %

    Active corridorsActive correspondents

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

    %

    BanksTraditional money transfer firmsFinancial technology firms

    Remittances volumes are rising

    1 Average total cost for sending $200; figure adapted from The Economist (2019).Sources: National Bank of Belgium; SWIFT BI Watch; The Economist (2019); World Bank, Remittance Prices Worldwide; World Bank; BIS calculations.

    0

    150

    300

    450

    600

    91 94 97 00 03 06 09 12 15 18

    USD bn

    World inflows

    Placing a higher burden on emerging market economies that rely on remittances

  • Restricted

    Game changerAre Central Bank Digital Currencies the solution?

    5

  • Restricted 6

    Central bank digital currencies

    Source: Bech and Garratt, BIS Quarterly Review, September 2017, adapted by CPMI-MC report (2018).

  • Restricted 7

    Design choices

    Existing central bank money Central bank digital currencies

    CashReserves and

    settlement balances

    General purposeWholesale only token

    token accounts

    24/7 availability () ()

    Anonymity vis-à-vis central bank () ()

    Peer-to-peer transfer () ()

    Interest-bearing () () () ()

    Limits or caps () () ()

    = existing or likely feature, () = possible feature, = not typical or possible feature.

  • Restricted 8

    CBDC for all

    The potential positives:

    Safer deposit account

    Lower barrier to entry/improving inclusion

    Easier negative rates

    Better competition for customer deposits

    Easier cross-border payments

    The considerations:

    Feasibility Mandate/legal Cyber risk AML/CFT Logistics

    Financial intermediation bank deposits Impact banks’ business models and

    lending

    Financial stability quicker bank runs vs safe deposits

  • Restricted 9

    Wholesale CBDC

    Experiments to date result in systems that look broadly similar to, and not clearly superior to, existing RTGS

    But there might be a role to play if RTGS are not yet developed

    Higher risks – DLTs are largely untested

    Higher reward?

    More work and experimentation needed

  • Restricted

    Financial pain could be bigtechs’ gain

    10

  • Restricted 11

    Big techs are increasingly moving into mobile payments

    1 Venmo is a mobile payments app owned by PayPal that integrates social media features. It is popular among college students in the US. 2 Calibra is the mobile wallet that will run on top of the Libra network. 3 M-Pesa (M for mobile, pesa is Swahili for money) is a mobile phone-based money transfer, financing and microfinancing service, launched in 2007.

  • Restricted

    The need for speed - the back-ends are improving

    Sweden mobile payments take-offDiffusion of fast payments 1 Use of fast payments

    1 The dashed part of the lines corresponds to projected implementation.Sources: Bech and Hobijn (2007); Bech, Shimizu and Wong (2017); CPMI Red Book Statistics; FIS (2018); national central banks; World Bank Group; IMF.

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

    % of GDP % of GDP

    Card payments (lhs)Cash in circulationSmartphone app (Swish)

    0

    35

    70

    105

    140

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    80 85 90 95 00 05 10 15 20

    Number %

    RTGS systemsFast payment systems

    Years (time scale)

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

    Number of transactions per capita

    ChileDenmarkIndia

    NigeriaMalaysiaMexico

    SingaporeSwedenUnited Kingdom

    Years after implementation

  • Restricted 13

    New potential entry – global stablecoins

    Front-end Back-end

  • Restricted 14

    Stablecoins – bringing cryptos closer to money

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    Tether DAI Bitcoin1 Ether1

    min-max rangemedian75th-25th percentile

    1 Bitcoin nor Ether are ‘stablecoins’; they are included for reference.Sources: G7 WG Investigating the impact of global stablecoins (2019); Bullmann, D, J Klemm and A Pinna (2019).

    A functional view of the stablecoin ecosystemVolatility

  • Restricted 15

    A simple framework …

    Reach Domestic Global

    Paym

    ents

    infra

    stru

    ctur

    e Overlay (Uses other

    infrastructure to transact)

    Stand alone

    (Traditional infrastructure

    and DLT)

    1 Venmo is a mobile payments app owned by PayPal that integrates social media features. It is popular among college students in the US. 2 Calibra is the mobile wallet that will run on top of the Libra network. 3 M-Pesa (M for mobile, pesa is Swahili for money) is a mobile phone-based money transfer, financing and microfinancing service, launched in 2007.

    P27

    Reach

    Domestic

    Global

    Payments infrastructure

    Overlay

    (Uses other infrastructure to transact)

    Stand alone

    (Traditional infrastructure and DLT)

  • Restricted 16

    Hybrid - a ‘synthetic’ CBDC

    Central Banks offer ‘eMoney’ providers access to their reserve accounts under a strict condition of 100% backing - IMF

    ‘Synthetic CBDC’ = Narrow banking Benefits:

    Remove credit risk Retail services provided by private sector

    Costs: Strict supervision required Reputation risk for Central Bank

  • Restricted

    Concluding remarks

    17

  • Restricted 18

    Walk the talk

    We need to improve the efficiency and inclusiveness of payment and financial services.

    Central banks assess the relevance of issuing central bank digital currencies.

    Public authorities consider most appropriate regulatory treatment of stablecoins and how existing regulatory frameworks can and should be applied.

    The FSB and international standard-setting bodies assess how existing international principles and standards could be applied.

    Maintain the high level of international coordination; ensure a level plaining field.

    Changing the game with digital moneyGame planKnown inefficiencies in FMI: inclusion and cross-border paymentsRemittance volumes and costs are rising�Game changer�Are Central Bank Digital Currencies the solution?Central bank digital currenciesDesign choicesCBDC for allWholesale CBDCFinancial pain could be bigtechs’ gainBig techs are increasingly moving into mobile paymentsThe need for speed - the back-ends are improvingNew potential entry – global stablecoinsStablecoins – bringing cryptos closer to moneyA simple framework …Hybrid - a ‘synthetic’ CBDCConcluding remarksWalk the talk