Social Workers - Palliative Care Victoria, Palliative Care ...
Challenges of Research in Palliative Care Gail Wiley CLRN Palliative Care Local Specialty Group.
-
Upload
austin-parks -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
3
Transcript of Challenges of Research in Palliative Care Gail Wiley CLRN Palliative Care Local Specialty Group.
Challenges of Research in Palliative Care
Gail Wiley
CLRN Palliative Care Local Specialty Group
Aims
• To give you a brief history of the Specialty Group
• To give you a ‘flavour’ of my job
• To put a piece of evidence into the context of real life
Challenges of Palliative Care Research
• Brief history
• Reflect on challenges and successes of screening and recruitment using PiPS and SPRAY as an example
• Future studies
NIHR Survey of UK Research Networks
Audit Group
• Mike Bennett (Chair of Pall Care CSG)
• Helen Radford (CSG Project Officer)
• Jo Gluth (Research Secretary)
UK Research Network survey
• Telephone Survey
• 43 of 65 UK Research Networks took part.
• Networks keen to support palliative care research with plans to increase staff support
Factors in successful recruitment
• Identifying motivated and experienced clinicians
• Having dedicated research staff coupled with training and education
What do you think are the barriers to palliative care research with your network? Please list:
STUDIES - 21 STAFF - 36 ENVIRONMENT - 35
Limited portfolio/ lack of available studies
16 No research nurse/ not
enough research nurses
7 Lack of resources 5
Local studies not being adopted 2 Limited staff time 6 Limited Funding 4
Lack of randomised control trials 1
Lack of palliative care experience among staff 4 No culture of research 4
Some trials too complex in design for an
inexperienced network to take on
1 Lack of clinical and/ or academic leadership
4 Palliative Care cross cutting over lots of
topics 2
Ignorance about the portfolio
1 Not enough specialists in the local area
4 Insurance issues for hospices
2
No administrative support
2 None 2
Staff consider trials too burdensome to
patients 2 No engagement in
research context 1
Generating enthusiasm 2
Interface between home, hospice and
hospital 1
Need more research personnel 2
Network focussed on secondary care 1
Lack of training 1 Lack of speciality study group 1
No champion 1 Cultural barriers 1 Palliative care
consultants afraid of research
1 Lack of infrastructure
support for developing grant applications
1
Research is low down on the priority list at
local hospices 1
(a) what are the factors that have contributed to this achievement
STUDIES - 3 STAFF - 43 ENVIRONMENT - 16
Home-grown study 1 Experienced palliative care nurse 9 Support from the co-
ordinating team 2
Suitability research before start studies 1 Clinician interest 7 Funded support 2
Availability of suitable study 1
Availability of funded research
nurse 6 Cross-network links 1
Good team of staff in place to
undertake the work 6 Willingness of
patients 1
Experienced palliative care
consultant/ specialist
5 Multi-disciplinary team discussion 1
Enthusiasm and drive in the team 4 Prioritising research
in job roles 1
Having a research champion 3
Availability of a speciality group in
palliative care 1
Motivated PI 1 Additional funding 1 Association with ‘big
name’ champion 1 Network is not the right place to ask that 1
Reflects interests of local researchers 1 In an area that needs
research 1
Can’t say/ not sure 1 Based in cancer
centre 1
Have trial strategy meetings 1
Not Sure 1
Findings
• Perceived barriers featured
• Lack of clinical leadership• Lack of dedicated research staff• Poor infrastructure within hospices• Not enough multicentre studies on the portfolio
Wot, no clinical research?
New Local Palliative Care Specialty Group
The vision• Create network of research active hospices in
North Lancashire and Cumbria
• Undertake NIHR portfolio research studies– locally developed – contribute to multicentre recruitment
• Building capacity – involving clinical staff in research– integrating research activity and findings into routine
palliative care services
Network of research active hospices
• Core funding from Cumbria and Lancashire CLRN to support 3 hospices– £60k per year for 2 years– Lancaster, Blackpool, Preston– Consultant sessions – Health research practitioner (0.6 WTE) in each
unit– Clinical trials co-ordinator
• Palliative Care Research Practitioner
• Palliative Care Experience – worked in Hospice and Acute Unit
• Appointed in January 2009
Challenge of Palliative Care Research on the Ground
Issues :
• social attitudes, which we all share.
• attitudes towards EOL issues amongst professionals
• communication about EOL
Research in a Hospice
• New to Hospice environment – practical challenges, finding a desk, lap top.
• New to Hospice staff, and new to me – fostering positive relationships – trust.
• Patients often too tired and frail, possibly with a short life expectancy
• Working with newly appointed Research Nurses in Blackpool and Preston.
Continued …
• Research could be seen to be too burdensome on patients’ already precious time and energy.
• Because of deterioration and life expectancy of some hospice patients, lengthy studies might have low recruitment.
Threat to staff and patients!
Storytime . . . .
PiPS
• Prognosis in Palliative Care Study• A multi-centre study to develop a prognostic
indicator for use in patients with advanced cancer.
• CI is Dr Paddy Stone, St George’s• A prospective observational study of
consecutive eligible referrals to palliative care units.
PiPS Screening
• All in patient admissions screened
• Locally advanced or metastatic cancer – no treatment planned
• Age 18
PiPS Data collected
Questionnaire - 10 minutes, Day 0 and Day 5-9• AMT• Demographics• Symptoms• Disease related variables• Bloods• Performance status• Global Health Status
Data continued . . .
• Observer rated symptom checklist and asked 2 clinicians to estimate survival of patient
• Clinician descriptors – age, sex, grade, years qualified, years worked in Palliative Care
PiPS Sensitive issues . . .
• Patients’ attitudes around prognosis• Self prognosis• Staff estimates of survival Study concerned with sensitive issues –
challenge of gatekeeping – ward staff and my own!
Communication!
New Ground
• Particular challenge was the eligibility of incompetent patients, where relatives/friends were asked to consent on the patient’s behalf.
• Important to include this group as cognitive impairment is one of the variables strongly associated with decreased survival.
The Challenge of Gatekeeping
Both my own and Hospice nurses
Developing trust
Being assertive
Use of positive language
Giving ward staff feedback
PiPS Recruitment• Screened 180 in-patient admissions
• 21 not eligible
• 88 not approached – various reasons – predominantly my annual leave!
Recruitment cont’d
28 patients recruited
7 of whom incompetent patients
23 patients recruited in Blackpool
Total of 51 substantial contribution to the study
Reflections on PiPS
Success!• All encompassing – because all patients were
screened• Constant presence on ward raised profile of
research in Hospice• Proof that we can involve incompetent
patients in research• Staff questionnaires – involved the clinical
staff in the research process
SPRAY
Briefly. . .Double Blind RCT with placebo arm.A dose range exploration of Sativex for cancer
painOur first commercial studyNew set of practical and organisational
challenges – especially pharmacy issues
SPRAY
New – recruiting from out-patient populationEducation session with Macmillan nurses and
other referrersLogistical planning – getting drug from RLI stocks
to the patient in the Hospice –Volunteer driversWork with pharmacy colleagues has been a
great success – Thank you!
SPRAY
Started screening in late August.Screened 2 patients in early SeptemberRandomised 1 patient on to study drug2nd highest recruiters in the UKSuccessfully tested systems and in readiness for
other pharma trials
Menu for 2010
• Fan for breathlessness – just started recruiting
• KPS
• Modafinil for fatigue
• TENS for cancer bone pain
• Cannabis spray II