Challenges of Multi-Goal Urban Stream Restoration-Kovalcik and Borcherds, 2012
-
Upload
healthy-lakes-healthy-lives -
Category
News & Politics
-
view
168 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Challenges of Multi-Goal Urban Stream Restoration-Kovalcik and Borcherds, 2012
Great Lakes Restoration ConferenceSeptember 11, 2012
Peter Briggs
Challenges in Multi-goal Stream Restoration Projects
Great Lakes Restoration ConferenceSeptember 11, 2012
Paul KovalcikSenior Environmental ScientistBiohabitats, Inc. Great Lakes Bioregion Office
Presenters
J. Meiring BorcherdsRegional Watershed CoordinatorCuyahoga County Board of Health
Great Lakes Restoration ConferenceSeptember 11, 2012
• Looking beyond habitat and improved ecology
• Learn perspectives of from multiple stakeholders
• Making the most out of available funding
Workshop Goals
USFWS , Thomas BarnesUSFWS , Edward Steenstra USFWS ,Steve Hillebrand
Great Lakes Restoration ConferenceSeptember 11, 2012
Hudson High School Tinkers Creek Stream Restoration
Great Lakes Restoration ConferenceSeptember 11, 2012
Tinkers Creek Stream Watershed
• Largest tributary to the Cuyahoga River (96 square miles)
• Approximately 30 miles in length
• Drains 24 communities in three different counties
• Nearly 19% impervious surface (range 6% to 47% for the subwatersheds)
• Tinkers Creek Watershed Partners Project Site
Great Lakes Restoration ConferenceSeptember 11, 2012
Hudson High School Tinkers Creek Stream Restoration
• 180 acre watershed (0.28 sq mi)
• Medium density residential development
• 17% impervious surface
• Restoration reach was once ditched and straightened
• Entirely on High school property
Great Lakes Restoration ConferenceSeptember 11, 2012
Existing Conditions
Great Lakes Restoration ConferenceSeptember 11, 2012
Project History
• In 2000 HHS teachers began developing the concept of using the stream corridor as a land lab to teach advanced ecology and biology.
• During summer 2003 the City of Hudson experienced severe/fatal flooding, completed an aggressive Stormwater Master Plan in 2004, and updated stormwater regulations.
• In 2005 a Watershed Master Plan was developed for Tinkers Creek
• In 2008 the Cuyahoga County Board of Health, in partnership with Tinkers Creek Watershed Partners, City of Hudson, and the Hudson City School District, applied for and received a 319 Grant through the Ohio EPA.
Great Lakes Restoration ConferenceSeptember 11, 2012
Stakeholders and Priorities
• Ohio EPA- Correct NPS caused water quality impairment to Ohio’s surface
water resources work toward aquatic life use attainment in impaired waters (improved aquatic habitat and water quality).
• Hudson High School - High quality education through development of an Outdoor Land Lab
• City of Hudson - Increased retention/detention
• Cuyahoga County Board Of Health - Improved surface water quality to protect public health
Great Lakes Restoration ConferenceSeptember 11, 2012
• Four groups
• Develop your goals and objectives for the project
• Report to the group
Our Task
Great Lakes Restoration ConferenceSeptember 11, 2012
What Happened
USFWS , Dave Menke
Great Lakes Restoration ConferenceSeptember 11, 2012
Project Goals
• Improved water quality and reduced erosion
• QHEI of 60 by June, 2012
• Wetland floodplain and in-stream habitat creation
• Develop a high quality land lab with Hudson High School Teachers
• Dissipate stream energy
• 2.0 million gallons of storage in the channel and floodplain
• Attenuate the existing 25 year storm discharge down to the 2 year predevelopment rate
Great Lakes Restoration ConferenceSeptember 11, 2012
Design Elements
• Hydrology and Hydraulics
• Compatibility of retention/detention
with habitat restoration
• Student access
• Excess soil excavation
• Design specifications for culverts
• Limited budget for planting
Great Lakes Restoration ConferenceSeptember 11, 2012
• Floodplain riffle weirs to maximize floodplain wetland habitat
• Improved sediment and pollutant processing
• Increased pool habitat
• Wet meadow, emergent wetland, scrub shrub wetland, and
riparian forest planting zones will be installed.
Habitat and Water quality
Great Lakes Restoration ConferenceSeptember 11, 2012
Habitat and Water Quality
Great Lakes Restoration ConferenceSeptember 11, 2012
Habitat and Water Quality
Great Lakes Restoration ConferenceSeptember 11, 2012
Habitat and Water Quality
Great Lakes Restoration ConferenceSeptember 11, 2012
• One stream day of pre-restoration monitoring in spring 2012
• Students will continue to monitor the restored channel.
• Designated paths and monitoring stations established
• Habitat “classrooms” associated with planting zones
• Students will assist with planting in November 2012
Land Lab
Great Lakes Restoration ConferenceSeptember 11, 2012
• 2.0 million gallons of storage capacity
• Pre-development 2 year discharge achieved
• Passage of aquatic life maintained
Floodplain Retention and Storage
Great Lakes Restoration ConferenceSeptember 11, 2012
Floodplain Retention and Storage
Great Lakes Restoration ConferenceSeptember 11, 2012
Floodplain Retention and Storage
Great Lakes Restoration ConferenceSeptember 11, 2012
• We often do not understand the full implications of our goals
until the design process.
• Multi-goal projects present challenges, but the rewards are high.
• Never stop looking for funding to improve the project.
Summary/Lessons Learned
Great Lakes Restoration ConferenceSeptember 11, 2012
Thank you
Great Lakes Restoration ConferenceSeptember 11, 2012
Thank you
Great Lakes Restoration ConferenceSeptember 11, 2012
Questions
Great Lakes Restoration ConferenceSeptember 11, 2012
Field Trips:Board on the 1st floor, West Superior Ave entrance (bottom
of Grand Staircase)Trolleys board 2:30
Joint Reception: trolleys begin departing at 5:45
Great Lakes Restoration ConferenceSeptember 11, 2012
Spread the word!Wireless password:
HOW12
Conference website:
Conference.healthylakes.org
Email us photos, comments, tweets or video:
On Twitter? Use the hashtag:
#healthylakes