challenges in marketing procurement...4 introduction The marketing category is a dynamic, exciting,...
Transcript of challenges in marketing procurement...4 introduction The marketing category is a dynamic, exciting,...
challenges in marketing procurement
2
contents
Foreword
Part 3: The Agency Dynamic
Part 1: Organisation & Structure
Introduction
Part 2: Performance & Predictions
3
15
5
4
7
3
foreword
Almost a year on from our original trends report and the changing
marketing landscape continues to present both opportunities and
challenges for procurement.
Procurement teams are becoming more progressive and integration
with marketing continues to improve. Half of respondents in our
study revealed they’re planning to restructure their teams to increase
alignment with marketing, demonstrating the continued investment in
strengthening relationships to achieve greater synergies.
Furthermore, with only a few exceptions, nearly every respondent
confirmed their KPIs are either closely or reasonably well matched with
their marketing teams.
Despite these developments nearly half of procurement expect they will
have less control of marketing spend in the next three years. Although
gaining complete control of budgets isn’t necessarily the objective this
will no doubt be something procurement will wish to address.
However, with the enduring trend for marketing budgets to continue
shifting to digital channels marketing will no doubt value the unique
benefits procurement can offer. Procurement now has a firm
understanding of digital and the value that can be added in this
increasing area of spend will prove fundamental for marketing teams.
Yves RogivueCEOKonica Minolta Marketing Services
4
introduction
The marketing category is a dynamic, exciting, forward-thinking, customer-centric and entrepreneurial category of spend to
work in and has been an established procurement skill set in Europe for over 20 years.
It does differ from other procurement categories, as relationships and personal opinion plays a more significant role.
However, with a rapidly changing technology-driven marketplace, both marketing and agencies have to be quicker to adapt
marketing strategies, review media choices, use technology and manage societal implications.
Procurement can provide and manage the supplier network to assist in this delivery by utilising the skills and processes that it
has, as well as providing market and supplier insight.
The focus in this study was to look at optimisation and drivers: how marketing procurement can review the multiple sub categories that
sit in marketing, and what the best strategies are to do this.
More than 100 senior executives were interviewed, with job titles including: Global Head of Marketing Procurement,
Head of Marketing Procurement, Marketing Procurement Category Lead and Director/ Head Indirect Spend among others of
similar standing.
Additional contributorsThe benchmark data and analysis contained in this report is complemented by selected quotations taken from interviews with
industry experts. The comments presented here are intended to add personal insight and do not reflect the views or policies of
their respective companies.
Tina FegentIndependent Consultant,
ProcureCon Marketing Advisory Board
Peter RoweGroup Sourcing Manager Marketing,
RBS
Larry SmithStrategic Sourcing Director Global Marketing,
Mars
Barry ByrneGlobal Procurement Director - Marketing Services,
SAB Miller
5
part 1: organisation & structure
What is the scope of your marketing procurement role?
How long has your organisation had a marketing procurement department?
How is your marketing procurement team structured?
More than half (58%) of procurement teams have adopted a regional structure for their organisation. This is in
contrast to only a quarter who have elected to concentrate the responsibility for purchasing centrally. This allows
organisations to be more responsive to local factors, and offers the potential to be both more efficient, and cut out
unnecessary bureaucracy.
UK only
One country only outside of the UK
A region in Europe
All of Europe
EMEA
Global
16%
10%
17%
44%
6%
29%
< 3 years
3-5 years
6-10 years
11+ years
Do not have one yet
7%
44%37%
11% 1%
Centralised at a group level
Decentralised at a country or company level Regional Local
Mix of both, with group
taking the lead on the main categories
By category of spend
By business unit
23%58%37%25% 42% 61% 40%
6
Do you plan to restructure the marketing procurement team in the future, to align more with the marketing department or with the business?
part 1: organisation & structure
A full half of respondents are planning to
restructure their procurement in the future
and a further 30% say that restructuring
to better align with either the marketing
department or the business is possible. This
may represent the swinging pendulum of
opinion on how best to structure marketing
procurement, however, it could also be due
to uncertainty on what the future holds,
especially in the light of digitisation and the
growth of mobile and social channels.
" To a certain extent there will always be restructuring going on, as people move up and move on. One other main area
of change however is in the categories, and things are always evolving. Two years ago the digital category was most
likely a sub-set of IT procurement, now it is not necessarily clear whether it should sit in marketing procurement or IT
procurement. Of course, the need to restructure may also be the result of shrinking budgets and the need to do more
with fewer resources."
Tina Fegent, Independent Consultant, ProcureCon Marketing Advisory Board
50%
30%
20%
Yes
No
It's possible, but no decisions have been made yet
7
part 2: performance & predictions
What do you see as the future of Marketing Procurement?
There is a mixed view amongst marketing procurement teams of what their role will be in future. However, it is clear
that there is plenty for marketing procurement to contribute. Nearly 70% of respondents see development into
internal consultants, working with their colleagues to find solutions to shared problems, and 63% think the role will
involve developing into one of an information agent, providing data and analysis on market trends. However, the
traditional is not forgotten – 64% agree that continuing to focus on cost will be a big part of the future
for procurement.
68% Be an internal consultant, who works with stakeholders to look for solutions to their business problems
64% Continue to focus on cost as financial analyst
63% Develop into an intelligence agent who provides data on the market place
60% Risk advisor - help stakeholders manage risk
57% Relationship broker with stakeholders and agencies/suppliers
50% Legal advisor to ensure that we minimise exposure to any contractual risk in external relationships
24% Supplier coach and change agent
" I definitely think that more progressive procurement professionals are moving away from being purely focused on financial
analysis. They will tell you: they have done costs, they’ve looked at rates, and they’ve looked at how fees are structured
and at remuneration. These people are definitely moving toward a more consultancy based ways of working. For them,
being an agent of change is very important."
Tina Fegent, Independent Consultant, ProcureCon Marketing Advisory Board
64%68%
63%
57%
24%
60%
50%
8
part 2: performance & predictions
Will procurement have more or less control of marketing spend in the next three years?
More
Less
No change44%
44%
12%
In a surprising result, we see more than 40% of respondents under the impression that marketing procurement will
have less control that they currently do.
" I’ve always been of the view that we shouldn’t try to control the budget, rather we should seek to exert proper influence.
Companies who have let procurement completely control the marketing budget have tended to end up with decisions
being based on cost alone, and this often has negative effects. I don’t think that we in procurement should have complete
control over the budget, but we should be an equal partner to marketing and we should certainly have more influence."
Tina Fegent, Independent Consultant, ProcureCon Marketing Advisory Board
9
part 2: performance & predictions
Which KPIs do you use to measure the success of your marketing team?
Tina Fegent, Independent Consultant, ProcureCon Marketing Advisory Board
Nearly 80% of procurement teams use total cost of ownership reduction to measure the success of their marketing
procurement departments. There are also a range of other KPIs which are highlighted by these results, including a
focus on agency and supplier performance.
" It’s so important to look beyond cost savings – eventually they are going to run out, so you’ll have to focus on other
things. Things like supplier relationship management, adding value and driving out waste. We’re very focused now
on driving top-line value – driving sales. It’s good to see other companies moving away from simple cost savings and
looking at some of these important areas for business improvement."
Total cost of ownership reduction
Improvement to agency and supplier performance against agreed scorecard
Process improvements
Cost reduction
Cost avoidance
Innovation
Migration of risk
Improved marketing ROI
Satisfaction of internal stakeholders
Creating a customer journey
We do not have any KPIs in place
Aligning suppliers to ensure brand consistency
79%
55%
55%
53%
51%
51%
48%
47%
44%
42%
38%
3%
10
part 2: performance & predictions
How well are your marketing procurement KPIs matched with your marketing team?
Closely matched
Reasonably well matched
Poorly matched
Not at all matched
49%
46%
4%1%
Harmonising KPIs between marketing and procurement is an effective method of both achieving shared goals and
improving relations between departments. 49% of procurement teams already have closely matched KPIs, and a
further 46% are reasonably well matched. This result demonstrates the significance all stakeholders place on fostering
real trust.
11
part 2: performance & predictions
Is your marketing procurement department able to consistently demonstrate 'value add' (other than delivering cash savings)?
How and where marketing procurement can most effectively add value is a question on the lips of senior procurement
managers worldwide. 52% of procurement teams are able to add value consistently, while 41% feel that their
contribution, while occurring more slowly, adds value incrementally. Only seven percent of respondents do not feel
that they are able to consistently demonstrate added value.
" Marketing Procurement is well placed to offer significant value other than cost savings alone. This can come in variety
of forms, but some of the most important include:
� Sourcing: knowing your market and being able to respond quickly according to stakeholder requirements
� Safety: contractual negotiation (especially in a regulated industry)
� Contract Management: measuring SLAs and KPIs throughout the life of the agreement
� Efficiency: removing duplication, identifying process improvements (maybe using LEAN principles, certainly
automating through the use of technology)
� Alignment to marketing objectives: yes, delivering best value but also ensuring that service delivers to marketing
objectives (e.g. performance media delivers CPA, sponsorship delivers its own objectives, events spend drives
customer experience, etc.)"
Yes
No
Slowly
7%
52%
41%
Peter Rowe, Group Sourcing Manager Marketing, RBS
12
part 2: performance & predictions
Which categories of marketing spend are you able to consistently demonstrate 'value add' for?
" We need to stop referring to ‘digital’ as a category. It is most definitely not a category, it is our environment. I would
raise the debate that a category approach to marketing procurement has been successful, but in order to stay ahead
we need to create ‘journey managers’ who are more aligned to marketing managers than agencies and adopt a hybrid
model, keeping the best of category management."
Peter Rowe, Group Sourcing Manager Marketing, RBS
65%
62%
57%
56%
55%
39%
Market Research
Production
Digital
Promotional Merchandise
Data
Point of Sale
CRM/DM
Creative
Meetings and Events
Experimental
Media
PR
Sponsorship
39%
36%
34%
26%
22%
17%
13%
66%
13
part 2: performance & predictions
In which channels do you predict growth in the next five years?
The growth of social media and the use of
tablets and smartphones has gone hand in
hand. The effects of this are being felt even in
marketing procurement, and the results are
on show here. 82% of respondents predict
growth of the mobile / tablet channel, and a
further 64% on social media.
Marketing procurement spend will be
dramatically affected by digitalisation and the
growth of social media and mobile tech. It’s
absolutely clear the future is mobile (in fact
mobile is now!). I expect to see a huge uplift
in the volume of spend through this channel.
TV production will drop for sure, however,
it will still remain an important part of the
media mix, but not a leading part.
Barry Byrne, Global Procurement Director - Marketing Services,
SAB Milller
82% Social Media
64% Mobile/Tablet
8% TV/Radio
0% Print
82%
64%
8%
14
part 2: performance & predictions
Where is the greatest opportunity for optimisation in your organisation?
Clearly marketing procurement executives consider there to be significant room for optimisation in a number of spend
areas. This is a very positive outlook on spend habits which are sometimes assumed to be quite mature. Production
comes out as top of the list when it comes to the potential for optimisation, followed by media buying and market
research / data.
" Taking control of media spend takes someone with a really good strategic sourcing background who is mature
enough, senior enough and good enough with people to really absorb what they need to know about media. This will
enable them to work with people on the buying side to perform a really deep analysis of how the market works,
who the big players are, what the relative strength of their buying agency is in that market, and what the media
owners want."
Larry Smith, Strategic Sourcing Director Global Marketing, Mars
Unimportant
Production
Media Buying
Marketing Research/Data
Point of Sale
Display
Agency Fees
Highly Important
15
How many different agencies / suppliers do your departments use?
part 3: the agency relationship
0-10
11-20
21-30
31+
Managing agency and supplier relationships
is a core function for procurement. However,
doing this successfully remains a significant
challenge. 70% of procurement teams
manage up to twenty agencies or suppliers,
and a full 30% manage even more than that.
It is essential that procurement have a robust
strategy to manage and assess their suppliers
and streamline the roster if necessary.
37%
33%
13%
17%
Do you have true financial transparency in the client / agent relationship?
Yes
No
Sometimes
37%
33%
13%
17%
Nearly 60% of procurement teams now
consider themselves to have true financial
transparency in their relationship with
suppliers and agencies – a very positive
result indeed. Some marketing procurement
teams still have work to do however, 36%
of respondents felt they have achieved true
financial transparency with some but not
all of their agencies and suppliers, while
five percent did not feel their financial
relationships with agencies and supplier were
transparent at all.
" I can’t stress the importance of regular auditing enough. As much as you think you know what you’re doing, and that
you understand everything that’s going on, you don’t. I think a good, professional financial audit every three years is
healthy. Even the creative agencies said that they learned so much about themselves through the process."
Larry Smith, Strategic Sourcing Director Global Marketing, Mars
36%
59%
5%
16
What areas of spend have you decoupled from creative agencies?
part 3: the agency relationship
" Does decoupling still have a big part to play in marketing procurement strategy in future? Absolutely! In fact, it’s
amazing it hasn’t happened everywhere yet. Decoupling offers a big opportunity for TV and Digital, but is also an
absolute must for all below-the-line activity. "
Barry Byrne, Global Procurement Director - Marketing Services, SAB Miller
These results show that there is certainly more which can be done to optimise spend via decoupling. There has
certainly been progress, in particular in regard to traditional media where 28% have already decoupled their spend. It
is interesting to see that there is still lots of opportunity in this mature area of spend.
Broadcast
Digital
None
20%
28%
11%
53%
17
part 3: the agency relationship
To what extent are you able to evaluate your agency roster on the question of value vs price?
While evaluations themselves play a
very important role in procurement’s
ability to balance value and price,
the underlying strategies vary.
Approximately a third (34%) of
procurement teams operate 360
degree evaluations with all of their
clients, and a further third (33%)
evaluate each agency in detail,
although this is not yet a best practice
in the industry.
Getting the most out of your agencies is all about making sure that you have a really productive working relationship
with them, and making sure that you choose the right partners. Ultimately you need to make sure that you have a
robust strategy for managing the category, if you don’t have that you’re going to be flailing.
Larry Smith, Strategic Sourcing Director Global marketing, Mars
We engage in 360 degree evaluations with each of our agencies
We regularly evaluate each agency in detail
We conduct periodic evaluations of our agency roster
We evaluate our agencies on an ad hoc basis
34%
33%
21%
12%
18
part 3: the agency relationship
What tactics have you used to try to reduce agency spend?
Reducing the operational costs involved with working with a (potentially) large base of suppliers and agencies is an
important objective for marketing procurement teams. The most popular method for doing this is to tie agency fees to
performance related objectives (70%), this was followed closely by bargaining for volume based discounts (64%), using
agency trading desks (63%), and consolidating the number of providers (63%).
Introduced a program to tie agency fees to performance
64%Bargaining for discount based on volume
63%Using agency trading desks
63%Consolidating the number of providers
57%Regular contractual renegotiation
Redistributing media spend (e.g. traditional to digital media)
26%
45%Bonus programme for hitting cost / service commitments
27%Decopling production from creative
70%
19
about Konica Minolta Marketing Services
For more information about Konica Minolta Marketing Services visit ms.konicaminolta.com
Marketing Procurement:� Print management
� Permanent point of sale
� Promotional merchandise
Marketing Production:� Central production agency
� On-site agency
� On-site studio
Customer Engagement:� Digital
� Data
� Direct
� Social
About the studyThis report is based on research carried out with WBR surveying leading procurement professionals in 2016.
About Konica Minolta Marketing Services Konica Minolta Marketing Services is a Global Marketing Services company that manages the creation, production and distribution of cross-channel communications. We provide strategic procurement solutions for marketing production services, whilst adding value and reducing costs.
We work with some of the world’s top brands across multiple territories including BMW, Stanley Black & Decker, Unilever and Sony. We strive to truly understand our clients’ marketing goals – using this insight to deliver cost effective, innovative and sustainable brand management solutions.
Our core areas of expertise are: