Challenges for Marine Protected Areas...Lauru Ridges to Reefs Protected Area Network 20 August 2015...
Transcript of Challenges for Marine Protected Areas...Lauru Ridges to Reefs Protected Area Network 20 August 2015...
Page 1
Challenges for Marine Protected Areas
Vilm Seminar „Biodiversity Conservation for Human Wellbeing“4 August 2015
Page 2
Challenges for Marine Protected Areas
Vilm Seminar „Biodiversity Conservation for Human Wellbeing“4 August 2015
- and examples for addressing them
Page 3
Agenda
Blue Solutions20 August 2015
1. Threats to marine and coastal biodiversity
2. What are MPAs?
• Marine vs terrestrial ecosystems and management implications
• CBD strategic plan for biodiversity
3. Challenges in regard to…
• …identification
• …designation
• …management
4. Conclusion and recommendations
Page 4
1. Threats to marine and coastal biodiversity
Blue Solutions20 August 2015
• Land use change and habitat loss
• Unsustainable fishing
• Eutrophication and pollution
• Climate change
MPAs as one tool to address these threats
Source: Reuters
© C Furlong/Getty Images
© M Potenski
© L Hislop
Page 5Blue Solutions20 August 2015
• IUCN: “A clearly defined geographical space, recognised, dedicated and managed, through legal or other effective means, to achieve the long-term conservation of nature with associated ecosystem services and cultural values”
• FAO: „any marine geographical area that is afforded greater protection than the surrounding waters for biodiversity conservation or fisheries management purposes will be considered an MPA“
2. What are MPAs?
© Rebecca Weeks | Marine Photobank
Page 6Blue Solutions20 August 2015
As of August 2014, Source: UNEP-WCMC
Protected areas cover 3.41% of the oceans
Page 7Blue Solutions20 August 2015
• Aichi target 11: “By 2020, at least 17 per cent of terrestrial and inland water, and
Marine vs terrestrial ecosystems
Source: Secretariat of the CBD (2014), Global Biodiversity Outlook 4,
Page 8Blue Solutions20 August 2015
Multi-dimensionality and connectivity• Third dimension: changes in species distribution in
water column
• Very large scale over which marine connectivity occurs
Currents and tides• Surrounding /„up-current“ influences from tides & currents
• More “open” systems: more exchange, influence by e.g. up-stream pollution
Uncertainty• More complex: wider diversity of niches and greater
number of trophic levels
• Logistical problems of observing and studying marine environments; high costs
Marine vs terrestrial ecosystems
© J Ziegler
Page 9Blue Solutions20 August 2015
Property rights• Less distinct boundaries; poorly defined rights of access and use
• Marine activities largely regulated on sectoral basis, i.e. different authorities
Enforcement and management• Multiple access points
• „Innocent passage“ afforded to all vessels (UNCLOS)
• Detection of illegal/ unregulated activities and their impacts
Marine vs terrestrial ecosystems
Page 10Blue Solutions20 August 2015
• Aichi target 11: “By 2020, at least 17 per cent of terrestrial and inland water, and 10 per cent of coastal and marine areas, especially areas of particular importance for biodiversity and ecosystem services, are conserved through effectively and equitably managed, ecologically representative and well connected systems of protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures, and integrated into the wider landscapes and seascapes.”
Upcoming:
• Sustainable Development Goal 14: „Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development”
CBD Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020
Page 11Blue Solutions20 August 2015
“…especially areas of particular importance for biodiversity and ecosystem services…”
• Not only focus on biodiversity hotspots but also ecosystem services hotspots
3.1. Identification of MPAs
Page 12Blue Solutions20 August 2015
Biodiversity Hotspots
Page 13Blue Solutions20 August 2015
“…especially areas of particular importance for biodiversity and ecosystem services…”
• Not only focus on biodiversity hotspots but also ecosystem services hotspots
• Data on marine ecosystems and ecosystem services and how well current MPAs protect these
Need for selection criteria
3.1. Identification of MPAs
Page 14Blue Solutions20 August 2015
“…especially areas of particular importance for biodiversity and ecosystem services…”
• Not only focus on biodiversity hotspots but also ecosystem services hotspots
• Data on marine ecosystems and ecosystem services and how well current MPAs protect these
Need for selection criteria
• Data collection is expensive and time consuming
Precautionary approach
3.1. Identification of MPAs
Page 15Blue Solutions20 August 2015
• Developed & maintained by students of the University of Pernambuco
• Objectives:
• Improve access to information
• Collect sound information for MPA management plan
• Identify knowledge gaps
• Connect researchers based at geographically distant institutions
• Impacts:
• Up-scaling: new online libraries in/for other MPAs in Brazil
• Reserve known across the region and beyond
https://sites.google.com/site/bibliotecavirtualdaresex/
http://www.panorama.solutions/content/line-library-marine-extractive-reserve-brazilian-northeast-0
Online library of the Acaú-Goiana Extractive Reserve , Brazil
Page 16Blue Solutions20 August 2015
• Setting the goals – What is the primary objective of the MPA?
3.2. Designation of MPAs
Page 17
Objectives of an MPA as defined by IUCN per category
Blue Solutions20 August 2015
• Conserve outstanding ecosystems, species and/or geodiversity features
• Protect long-term ecological integrity of natural areas
• Protect natural biodiversity, underlying ecological structure and support environmental processes, promote education and recreation
• Protect specific outstanding natural features and associated biodiversity and habitats
• Maintain, conserve and restore species and habitats
• Protect and sustain important seascapes, associated nature conservation and other values created by interactions with humans through traditional management practices
• Protect natural ecosystems and use natural resources sustainably
Page 18Blue Solutions20 August 2015
• Setting the goals – What is the primary objective of the MPA?
Determine optimum size, number and location of MPAs
3.2. Designation of MPAs
Page 19Blue Solutions20 August 2015
• Setting the goals – What is the primary objective of the MPA?
Determine optimum size, number and location of MPAs
„… ecologically representative and well connected systems of protected areas and other area-based conservation measures, and integrated into the wider landscapes and seascapes.“
• MPA networks
A group of individual sites is not yet a network!
Systems or networks of MPAs over large regions or
between nations
3.2. Designation of MPAs
Page 20
Lauru Ridges to Reefs Protected Area Network
Blue Solutions20 August 2015
• First locally-managed marine area network in Melanesia
• Established in a community-led process and based on master conservation plan; full ownership by local communities
• Impacts:
• Stocks of commercial species noticeably recovered
• Alternative livelihood options (ecotourism) generated revenues
• Conservation priorities improve stakeholders bargaining power when negotiating with mining companies and national government
• Better knowledge of natural and cultural resourceshttp://www.panorama.solutions/content/lauru-ridges-reefs-
protected-area-network-lauru-pan
© James Hardcastle
© Jimmy Kereseka
Page 21Blue Solutions20 August 2015
• Setting the goals – What is the primary objective of the MPA?
Determine optimum size, number and location of MPAs
„… ecologically representative and well connected systems of protected areas and other area-based conservation measures, and integrated into the wider landscapes and seascapes.“
• Three designs most commonly used: small single area, large single area or network of areas
• MPA networks
A group of individual sites is not yet a network!
Systems or networks of MPAs over large regions or between nations
• Who pays? – Sustainable, long-term financing is essential
3.2. Designation of MPAs
Page 22
Conservation Trust Fund for Sustainable Financing of MPAs
Blue Solutions20 August 2015
• Public-private partnership between CONANP and the Mexican Fund for the Conservation of Nature (FMCN) which supports basic operation of MPA with the revenue from the trust
• Impacts:
• Close collaboration for 17 years in this PPP that is considered highly successful
• Collaboration is expanding to the fisheries sector
http://www.panorama.solutions/content/conservation-trust-fund-sustainable-financing-mpas
Page 23Blue Solutions20 August 2015
• Different categories based on primary management objective which should apply to min 75% of the area:
• Ia Strict Nature Reserve
• Ib Wilderness Area
• II National Park
• III Natural Monument or Feature
• IV Habitat/Species Management Area
• V Protected Landscape/Seascape
• VI Protected Area with sustainable use of natural resources
© papahanaumokuakea.gov
Categories
Page 24Blue Solutions20 August 2015
Page 25Blue Solutions20 August 2015
© Fish et al (2004)
Page 26Blue Solutions20 August 2015
„… effectively and equitably managed…“
Management Plan - Avoid another paper park
• Primary objective of MPA
• Regulations: quotas, equipment restrictions, licenses & permits, …
• Enforcement
• Monitoring
• Governance
• …
3.3. Management of MPAs
Page 27Blue Solutions20 August 2015
Governance
• Use of marine resources governed by different laws and regulations
• MPAs overlap multiple jurisdictions and involve multiple management partners with different responsibilities
3.4. Management of MPAs
Page 28Blue Solutions20 August 2015
Governance
• Use of marine resources governed by different laws and regulations
• MPAs overlap multiple jurisdictions and involve multiple management partners with different responsibilities
• Need to
• Effectively coordinate multiple jurisdictions
• Establish a more coordinated program of management, assistance, and information-sharing
3.4. Management of MPAs
Page 29Blue Solutions20 August 2015
Governance
• Use of marine resources governed by different laws and regulations
• MPAs overlap multiple jurisdictions and involve multiple management partners with different responsibilities
• Need to
• Effectively coordinate multiple jurisdictions
• Establish a more coordinated program of management, assistance, and information-sharing
• Public engagement in MPA planning is vital to achieving conservation goals
3.4. Management of MPAs
Page 30
Management Committees for participatory MPA management
Blue Solutions20 August 2015
• Participative processes for establishment and zoning of an MPA, involving local fishermen in its creation and categorization
• Impacts
• Fishermen are active partner for current management through the Management Committee
• Fishermen themselves contribute to control and surveillance
• Reduced conflicts at the local level
• More sustainable use of marine resources
http://www.panorama.solutions/content/management-committees-participatory-mpa-management
Page 31
Excursion: Protecting biodiversity of the High Sea
Blue Solutions20 August 2015
• Government representatives agreed to launch a formal preparatory process for a global and legally-binding instrument for the conservation and sustainable use of marine biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction under UNCLOS
• Formal preparatory committee starts in early 2016
Designation of a global system of MPAs
Mainstreaming biodiversity conservation into the governance of high seas fisheries, shipping and seabed mining
Providing for more effective access to marine genetic resources
Page 32
Excursion: EBSAs
Blue Solutions20 August 2015
• CBD process to identify most ecologically and biologically important ocean areas
• Identification based on 7 scientific criteria
• Encouragement of CBD to cooperate to identify and adopt appropriate measures for conservation and sustainable use (e.g. establishing MPA networks)
Page 33
Excursion: EBSAs
Blue Solutions20 August 2015
= Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas
• CBD process to identify most ecologically and biologically important oceanareas
• Identification based on 7 scientific criteria
• Encouragement of CBD to cooperate to identify and adopt appropriatemeasures for conservation and sustainable use (e.g. establishing MPA networks)
Page 34Blue Solutions20 August 2015
• CBD provides an international framework
• But…
even if 10% are protected, 90% are not
“How inappropriate to call this planet Earth when it is quite clearly Ocean.”
Arthur C. Clarke
4. Conclusion and recommendations
Page 35Blue Solutions20 August 2015
• Five factors for effective protection (Edgar et al., 2014):
1) Full protection
2) Enforcement of protection
3) Age greater than 10 years
4) Size more than 100km2
5) Isolation
4. Conclusion and recommendations
Page 36
4. Conclusion and recommendations
Blue Solutions20 August 2015
• Increase area covered fully protected
• Ensure management effectiveness of all MPAs
• Increase number of MPA networks
• Integrate MPAs into broader seascape and landscape
• Target protection of both biodiversity and ecosystem services
• Recognise MPAs as solutions for climate change adaptation, mitigation and DRR, and include them in relevant international conventions and strategies
• Detect and prevent IUU with focus on MPAs
Page 37Blue Solutions20 August 2015
• Use new technology, social media and learning networks
• Develop innovative partnerships
• Secure new long-term funding
• Harness business and private sector
• Share data
• Integrate MPAs as a conservation measure into broader area management plans
Marine Spatial Planning
4. Conclusion and recommendations
Page 38
4. Conclusion and recommendations
Blue Solutions20 August 2015