Ch4-1_to4-2
-
Upload
fusionice2391 -
Category
Documents
-
view
7 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Ch4-1_to4-2
© D.J. Inman 1/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Chapter 4 Multiple Degree of Freedom Systems
Extending the first 3 chapters to more then one degree of freedom
The Millennium bridge required many degrees of freedom to model and design with.
© D.J. Inman 2/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
The first step in analyzing multiple degrees of freedom (DOF) is to look at 2 DOF • DOF: Minimum number of coordinates to specify the
position of a system • Many systems have more than 1 DOF • Examples of 2 DOF systems
– car with sprung and unsprung mass (both heave) – elastic pendulum (radial and angular) – motions of a ship (roll and pitch)
Fig 4.1
© D.J. Inman 3/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
4.1 Two-Degree-of-Freedom Model (Undamped)
A 2 degree of freedom system used to base much of the analysis and conceptual development of MDOF systems on.
© D.J. Inman 4/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Free-Body Diagram of each mass
x1 x2
m1 m2 k1 x1
k2(x2 -x1)
Figure 4.2
© D.J. Inman 5/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Summing forces yields the equations of motion:
m1!!x1(t) = −k1x1(t) + k2 x2 (t) − x1(t)( )m2!!x2 (t) = −k2 x2 (t) − x1(t)( ) (4.1)
Rearranging terms:m1!!x1(t) + (k1 + k2 )x1(t) − k2x2 (t) = 0m2!!x2 (t) − k2x1(t) + k2x2 (t) = 0
(4.2)
© D.J. Inman 6/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Note that it is always the case that
• A 2 Degree-of-Freedom system has – Two equations of motion! – Two natural frequencies (as we shall see)!
© D.J. Inman 7/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
The dynamics of a 2 DOF system consists of 2 homogeneous and coupled equations
• Free vibrations, so homogeneous eqs. • Equations are coupled:
– Both have x1 and x2. – If only one mass moves, the other follows – Example: pitch and heave of a car model
• In this case the coupling is due to k2. – Mathematically and Physically – If k2 = 0, no coupling occurs and can be solved
as two independent SDOF systems
© D.J. Inman 8/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Initial Conditions • Two coupled, second -order, ordinary
differential equations with constant coefficients
• Needs 4 constants of integration to solve • Thus 4 initial conditions on positions and
velocities
x1(0) = x10 , !x1(0) = !x10 , x2 (0) = x20 , !x2 (0) = !x20
© D.J. Inman 9/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Solution by Matrix Methods
x(t) =x1(t)x2 (t)⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥ , !x(t) =
!x1(t)!x2 (t)
⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥ , !!x(t) =
!!x1(t)!!x2 (t)⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥
M =m1 00 m2
⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥ , K =
k1 + k2 −k2
−k2 k2
⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥
M!!x + Kx = 0
�
m1˙ ̇ x 1(t) + (k1 + k2)x1(t) − k2x2(t) = 0m2˙ ̇ x 2(t) − k2x1(t) + k2x2(t) = 0
The two equations can be written in the form of a
single matrix equation (see pages 272-275 if matrices and
vectors are a struggle for you) :
(4.4), (4.5)
(4.6), (4.9)
© D.J. Inman 10/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Initial Conditions
x(0) =
x10
x20
⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥, and !x(0) =
!x10
!x20
⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥
IC’s can also be written in vector form
© D.J. Inman 11/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
The approach to a Solution:
Let x(t) = ue jω t
j = −1, u /= 0, ω , u unknown
⇒ -ω 2M + K( )ue jω t = 0 ⇒ -ω 2M + K( )u = 0
For 1DOF we assumed the scalar solution aeλt Similarly, now we assume the vector form:
(4.15)
(4.16)
(4.17)
© D.J. Inman 12/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
This changes the differential equation of motion into algebraic vector equation:
-ω 2M + K( )u = 0 (4.17)
This is two algebraic equation in 3 uknowns ( 1 vector of two elements and 1 scalar):
u=u1
u2
⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥, and ω
© D.J. Inman 13/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
The condition for solution of this matrix equation requires that the the matrix inverse does not exist:
If the inv -ω 2M + K( ) exists ⇒ u = 0: which is the
static equilibrium position. For motion to occur
u /= 0 ⇒ -ω 2M + K( )−1 does not exist
or det -ω 2M + K( ) = 0 (4.19)
The determinant results in 1 equation in one unknown ω (called the characteristic equation)
© D.J. Inman 14/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Back to our specific system: the characteristic equation is defined as
�
det -ω2M + K( ) = 0⇒
det−ω2m1 + k1 + k2 −k2
−k2 −ω2m2 + k2
⎡
⎣ ⎢
⎤
⎦ ⎥ = 0⇒
m1m2ω4 − (m1k2 +m2k1 + m2k2 )ω2 + k1k2 = 0
Eq. (4.21) is quadratic in ω2 so four solutions result:
(4.20)
(4.21)
ω12 and ω2
2 ⇒ ±ω1 and ±ω2
© D.J. Inman 15/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Once ω is known, use equation (4.17) again to calculate the corresponding vectors u1 and u2
(−ω12M + K )u1 = 0 (4.22)
and (−ω2
2M + K )u2 = 0 (4.23)
This yields vector equation for each squared frequency:"
Each of these matrix equations represents 2 equations in the 2 unknowns components of the vector, but the coefficient matrix is singular so each matrix equation results in only 1 independent equation. The following examples clarify this."
© D.J. Inman 16/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Examples 4.1.5 & 4.1.6:calculating u and ω • m1=9 kg,m2=1kg, k1=24 N/m and k2=3 N/m • The characteristic equation becomes
ω4-6ω2+8=(ω2-2)(ω2-4)=0 ω2 = 2 and ω2 =4 or ω1,3 = ± 2 rad/s, ω2,4 = ± 2 rad/s
Each value of ω2 yields an expression for u:"
© D.J. Inman 17/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Computing the vectors u For ω1
2 =2, denote u1 =u11
u12
⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥ then we have
(-ω12M + K )u1 = 0⇒
27 − 9(2) −3−3 3− (2)
⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥u11
u12
⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥ =
00⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥ ⇒
9u11 − 3u12 = 0 and − 3u11 + u12 = 0
2 equations, 2 unknowns but DEPENDENT!"(the 2nd equation is -3 times the first) "
© D.J. Inman 18/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
u11
u12
=13⇒ u11 =
13u12 results from both equations:
only the direction, not the magnitude can be determined!This is because: det(−ω1
2M + K ) = 0.The magnitude of the vector is arbitrary. To see this suppose that u1 satisfies(−ω1
2M + K )u1 = 0, so does au1, a arbitrary. So (−ω1
2M + K )au1 = 0⇔ (−ω12M + K )u1 = 0
Only the direction of vectors u can be determined, not the magnitude as it remains arbitrary
© D.J. Inman 19/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Likewise for the second value of ω2
For ω22 = 4, let u2 =
u21
u22
⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥ then we have
(-ω12M + K )u = 0⇒
27 − 9(4) −3−3 3− (4)
⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥u21
u22
⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥ =
00⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥ ⇒
−9u21 − 3u22 = 0 or u21 = −13u22
Note that the other equation is the same"
© D.J. Inman 20/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
What to do about the magnitude!
u12 = 1 ⇒ u1 =1
3
1⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥
u22 = 1 ⇒ u2 =−1
3
1⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥
Several possibilities, here we just fix one element: Choose:"
Choose:"
© D.J. Inman 21/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Thus the solution to the algebraic matrix equation is:
ω1,3 = ± 2, has mode shape u1 =1
3
1⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥
ω2,4 = ± 2, has mode shape u2 =−1
3
1⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥
Here we have introduce the name mode shape to describe the vectors u1 and u2. The origin of this name comes later
© D.J. Inman 22/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Return now to the time response:
x(t) = u1e− jω1t , u1e
jω1t , u2e− jω2 t ,u2e
jω2 t ⇒
x(t) = au1e− jω1t + bu1e
jω1t + cu2e− jω2 t + du2e
jω2 t
⇒ x(t) = ae− jω1t + be jω1t( )u1 + ce− jω2 t + de jω2 t( )u2
= A1 sin(ω1t + φ1)u1 + A2 sin(ω2t + φ2 )u2
where A1,A2 ,φ1, and φ2 are constants of integration
We have computed four solutions:"
Since linear, we can combine as:"
determined by initial conditions. "
(4.24)
(4.26)
Note that to go from the exponential form to to sine requires Euler’s formula for trig functions and uses up the +/- sign on omega
© D.J. Inman 23/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Physical interpretation of all that math! • Each of the TWO masses is oscillating at TWO
natural frequencies ω1and ω2 • The relative magnitude of each sine term, and
hence of the magnitude of oscillation of m1 and m2 is determined by the value of A1u1 and A2u2
• The vectors u1 and u2 are called mode shapes because the describe the relative magnitude of oscillation between the two masses
© D.J. Inman 24/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
What is a mode shape? • First note that A1, A2, Φ1 and Φ2 are determined by
the initial conditions • Choose them so that A2 = Φ1 = Φ2 =0 • Then:
• Thus each mass oscillates at (one) frequency w1 with magnitudes proportional to u1 the 1st mode shape
x(t) =x1(t)x2 (t)⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥ = A1
u11u12
⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥sinω1t = A1u1 sinω1t
© D.J. Inman 25/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
A graphic look at mode shapes:
Mode 1: k1
m1
x1
m2
x2 k2
Mode 2: k1
m1
x1
m2
x2 k2
x2=A
x2=A x1=A/3
x1=-A/3
u1 =13
1⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥
u2 =−13
1⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥
If IC’s correspond to mode 1 or 2, then the response is purely in mode 1 or mode 2.
© D.J. Inman 26/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Example 4.1.7 given the initial conditions compute the time response
( ) ( )( ) ( )
( ) ( )( ) ( )⎥
⎥⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎣
⎡
+++
+−+=⎥⎦⎤
⎢⎣⎡
⎥⎥⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎣
⎡
+++
+−+=⎥⎦⎤
⎢⎣⎡
⎥⎦⎤
⎢⎣⎡=⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣⎡
2211
22
11
2
1
2211
22
11
2
1
2cos22cos2
2cos23
2cos23)(
)(
2sin2sin
2sin3
2sin3)(
)(
00
)0( mm, 01
=(0)consider
φφ
φφ
φφ
φφ
tAtA
tAtA
txtx
tAtA
tAtA
txtx
!!
!xx
© D.J. Inman 27/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
�
1 mm0
⎡
⎣ ⎢
⎤
⎦ ⎥ =
A1
3sin φ1( ) − A2
3sin φ2( )
A1 sin φ1( ) + A2 sin φ2( )
⎡
⎣
⎢ ⎢
⎤
⎦
⎥ ⎥
00⎡
⎣ ⎢ ⎤
⎦ ⎥ =
A1
32 cos φ1( ) − 2 A2
3cos φ2( )
A1 2 cos φ1( ) + 2A2 cos φ2( )
⎡
⎣
⎢ ⎢
⎤
⎦
⎥ ⎥
At t = 0 we have"
© D.J. Inman 28/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
3 = A1 sin φ1( ) − A2 sin φ2( )0 = A1 sin φ1( ) + A2 sin φ2( )0 = A1 2 cos φ1( ) − A2 2cos φ2( )0 = A1 2 cos φ1( ) + A2 2cos φ2( )
A1 = 1.5 mm,A2 = −1.5 mm,φ1 = φ2 =π2
rad
4 equations in 4 unknowns: "
Yields:"
© D.J. Inman 29/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
The final solution is: x1(t) = 0.5cos 2t + 0.5cos2t
x2 (t) = 1.5cos 2t −1.5cos2tThese initial conditions gives a response that is a combination of modes. Both harmonic, but their summation is not.
Figure 4.3
(4.34)
© D.J. Inman 30/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Solution as a sum of modes
�
x(t) = a1u1 cosω1t + a2u2 cosω2t
Determines how the first "frequency contributes to the"response"
Determines how the second "frequency contributes to the"response"
© D.J. Inman 31/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Things to note • Two degrees of freedom implies two natural
frequencies • Each mass oscillates at with these two frequencies
present in the response and beats could result • Frequencies are not those of two component
systems
• The above is not the most efficient way to calculate frequencies as the following describes
ω1 = 2 ≠ k1m1
= 1.63,ω2 = 2 ≠k2m2
=1.732
© D.J. Inman 32/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Some matrix and vector reminders
A =a bc c⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥ ⇒ A−1 =
1ad − cb
d −b−c a⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥
xTx = x12 + x2
2
M =m1 00 m2
⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥ ⇒ xTMx = m1x1
2 + m2x22
M > 0 ⇒ xTMx > 0 for every value of x except 0
Then M is said to be positive definite
© D.J. Inman 33/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
4.2 Eigenvalues and Natural Frequencies • Can connect the vibration problem with the
algebraic eigenvalue problem developed in math
• This will give us some powerful computational skills
• And some powerful theory • All the codes have eigen-solvers so these
painful calculations can be automated
© D.J. Inman 34/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Some matrix results to help us use available computational tools: A matrix M is defined to be symmetric if
M = MT
A symmetric matrix M is positive definite if xTMx > 0 for all nonzero vectors x
A symmetric positive definite matrix M can be factored M = LLT
Here L is upper triangular, called a Cholesky matrix
© D.J. Inman 35/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
If the matrix L is diagonal, it defines the matrix square root
The matrix square root is the matrix M 1/2 such that M 1/2M 1/2 = MIf M is diagonal, then the matrix square root is just the rootof the diagonal elements:
L = M 1/2 =m1 0
0 m2
⎡
⎣⎢⎢
⎤
⎦⎥⎥
(4.35)
© D.J. Inman 36/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
A change of coordinates is introduced to capitalize on existing mathematics
M =m1 00 m2
⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥, M −1 =
1m1
00 1
m2
⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥, M −1/2 =
1m1
0
0 1m2
⎡
⎣⎢⎢
⎤
⎦⎥⎥
Let x(t) = M −1/2q(t) and multiply by M −1/2 : M −1/2MM −1/2
I identity! "## $## %%q(t) + M −1/2KM −1/2
&K symmetric! "## $## q(t) = 0 (4.38)
or %%q(t) + &Kq(t) = 0 where &K = M −1/2KM −1/2
&K is called the mass normalized stiffness and is similar to the scalar km
used extensively in single degree of freedom analysis. The key here is that&K is a SYMMETRIC matrix allowing the use of many nice properties and
computational tools
For a diagonal, positive definite matrix M:"
© D.J. Inman 37/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
How the vibration problem relates to the real symmetric eigenvalue problem
Assume q(t) = ve jω t in !!q(t) + "Kq(t) = 0−ω 2ve jω t + "Kve jω t = 0, v ≠ 0 or"Kv =ω 2v
vibration problem
(4.40)
# $% &% ⇔ "Kv = λv real symmetric eigenvalue problem (4.41)
#$% &% v ≠ 0
Note that the martrix !K contains the same type of informationas does ωn
2 in the single degree of freedom case.
© D.J. Inman 38/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Important Properties of the n x n Real Symmetric Eigenvalue Problem • There are n eigenvalues and they are all real
valued • There are n eigenvectors and they are all real
valued • The set of eigenvectors are orthogonal • The set of eigenvectors are linearly
independent • The matrix is similar to a diagonal matrix
Window 4.1 page 285
© D.J. Inman 39/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Square Matrix Review • Let aik be the ikth element of A then A is symmetric
if aik = aki denoted AT=A • A is positive definite if xTAx > 0 for all nonzero x
(also implies each λi > 0) • The stiffness matrix is usually symmetric and
positive semi definite (could have a zero eigenvalue)
• The mass matrix is positive definite and symmetric (and so far, its diagonal)
© D.J. Inman 40/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Normal and orthogonal vectors
x =x1
!xn
⎡
⎣
⎢⎢⎢
⎤
⎦
⎥⎥⎥, y =
y1
!yn
⎡
⎣
⎢⎢⎢
⎤
⎦
⎥⎥⎥, inner product is xTy = xiyi
i=1
n
∑
x orthogonal to y if xTy = 0 x is normal if xTx = 1
⎫⎬⎪
⎭⎪if a the set of vectores is is both orthogonal and normal it is called an orthonormal set
The norm of x is x = xTx (4.43)
© D.J. Inman 41/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Normalizing any vector can be done by dividing it by its norm:
xxTx
has norm of 1
To see this compute
(4.44)
xxTx
=xT
xTxxxTx
=xTxxTx
= 1
© D.J. Inman 42/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Examples 4.2.2 through 4.2.4
!K = M −1/2KM −1/2 =1
3 00 1
⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥
27 −3−3 3⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥
13 0
0 1⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥
so !K =3 −1−1 3⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥ which is symmetric.
det( !K − λI ) = det3-λ -1-1 3-λ
⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥ = λ2 − 6λ + 8 = 0
which has roots: λ1 = 2 =ω12 and λ2 = 4 =ω2
2
© D.J. Inman 43/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
( !K − λ1I )v1 = 0⇒3− 2 −1−1 3− 2
⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥v11
v12
⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥ =
00⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥ ⇒
v11 − v12 = 0 ⇒ v1 = α11⎡
⎣⎢⎤
⎦⎥
v1 = α 2 (1+1) = 1⇒ α = 12
v1 =12
11⎡
⎣⎢⎤
⎦⎥ The first normalized eigenvector"
© D.J. Inman 44/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
v2 =12
1−1⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥, v1
Tv2 =12
(1−1) = 0
v1Tv1 =
12
(1+1) = 1
v2Tv2 =
12
(1+ (−1)(−1)) = 1
⇒ v i are orthonormal
Likewise the second normalized eigenvector is computed and shown to be orthogonal to the first, so that the set is orthonormal
© D.J. Inman 45/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Modes u and Eigenvectors v are different but related: u1 ≠ v1 and u2 ≠ v2
x = M −1/2q⇒ u = M −1/2vNote
M 1/2u1 =3 00 1⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥
13
1
⎡
⎣⎢⎢
⎤
⎦⎥⎥=
11⎡
⎣⎢⎤
⎦⎥ = v1
(4.37)
© D.J. Inman 46/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
This orthonormal set of vectors is used to form an Orthogonal Matrix
P = v1 v2[ ]PTP =
v1Tv1 v1
Tv2v2Tv1 v2
Tv2
⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥ =
1 00 1⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥ = I
PT !KP = PT !Kv1 !Kv2⎡⎣ ⎤⎦ = PT λ1v1 λ2v2[ ]
=λ1v1
Tv1 λ2v1Tv2
λ1v2Tv1 λ2v2
Tv2
⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥ =
λ1 00 λ2
⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥ = diag(ω1
2 ,ω22 ) = Λ
P is called an orthogonal matrix"
P is also called a modal matrix"
called a matrix of eigenvectors (normalized)"
(4.47)
© D.J. Inman 47/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Example 4.2.3 compute P and show that it is an orthogonal matrix From the previous example:
P = v1 v1[ ] = 12
1 11 −1⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥ ⇒
PTP =12
12
1 11 −1⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥
1 11 −1⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥
= 12
1+1 1−11−1 1+1⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥ =
12
2 00 2⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥ = I
© D.J. Inman 48/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Example 4.2.4 Compute the square of the frequencies by matrix manipulation
PT !KP =12
1 11 −1⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥
3 −1−1 3⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥
12
1 11 −1⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥
= 12
1 11 −1⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥
2 42 −4⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥
= 12
4 00 8⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥ =
2 00 4⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥ = Λ =
ω12 0
0 ω22
⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥
⇒ω1 = 2 rad/s and ω2 = 2 rad/sIn general:
Λ = PT !KP = diag λi( ) = diag(ω i2 ) (4.48)
© D.J. Inman 49/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Example 4.2.5
Figure 4.4 The equations of motion:
m1!!x1 + (k1 + k2 )x1 − k2x2 = 0m2!!x2 − k2x1 + (k2 + k3)x2 = 0
(4.49)
In matrix form these become:
m1 00 m2
⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥ !!x +
k1 + k2 −k2
−k2 k2 + k3
⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥x = 0 (4.50)
© D.J. Inman 50/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Next substitute numerical values and compute P and Λ
m1 = 1 kg, m2 = 4 kg, k1 = k3 = 10 N/m and k2 =2 N/m
⇒ M =1 00 4⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥, K =
12 −2−2 12⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥
⇒ !K = M −1/2KM −1/2 =12 −1−1 12⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥
⇒ det !K − λI( ) = det12 − λ −1−1 12 − λ
⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥ = λ2 −15λ + 35 = 0
⇒λ1 = 2.8902 and λ2 = 12.1098⇒ω1 = 1.7 rad/s and ω2 = 12.1098 rad/s
© D.J. Inman 51/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Next compute the eigenvectors For λ1 equation (4.41 ) becomes:
12 - 2.8902 −1
−1 3 - 2.8902⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥v11
v21
⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥ = 0
⇒ 9.1089v11 = v21
Normalizing v1 yields
1 = v1 = v112 + v21
2 = v112 + (9.1089)2v11
2
⇒ v11 = 0.1091, and v21 = 0.9940
v1 =0.10910.9940⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥, likewise v2 =
−0.99400.1091
⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥
© D.J. Inman 52/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Next check the value of P to see if it behaves as its suppose to:
P = v1 v2[ ] = 0.1091 −0.99400.9940 0.1091⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥
PT !KP =0.1091 0.9940−0.9940 0.1091⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥12 −1−1 3⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥0.1091 −0.99400.9940 0.1091⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥ =
2.8402 00 12.1098
⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥
PTP =0.1091 0.9940−0.9940 0.1091⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥0.1091 −0.99400.9940 0.1091⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥ =
1 00 1⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥
Yes!
© D.J. Inman 53/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
A note on eigenvectors In the previous section, we could have chosed v2 to be
v2 =0.9940−0.1091⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥ instead of v2 =
-0.99400.1091
⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥
because one can always multiple an eigenvector by a constantand if the constant is -1 the result is still a normalized vector.
Does this make any difference?
No! Try it in the previous example
© D.J. Inman 54/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
All of the previous examples can and should be solved by “hand” to learn the methods However, they can also be solved on calculators with matrix functions and with the codes listed in the last section In fact, for more then two DOF one must use a code to solve for the natural frequencies and mode shapes.
Next we examine 3 other formulations for solving for modal data
© D.J. Inman 55/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Matlab commands • To compute the inverse of the square matrix
A: inv(A) or use A\eye(n) where n is the size of the matrix
• [P,D]=eig(A) computes the eigenvalues and normalized eigenvectors (watch the order). Stores them in the eigenvector matrix P and the diagonal matrix D (D=L)
© D.J. Inman 56/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
More commands • To compute the matrix square root use sqrtm(A)
• To compute the Cholesky factor: L= chol(M)!• To compute the norm: norm(x)!• To compute the determinant det(A)!• To enter a matrix:
K=[27 -3;-3 3]; M=[9 0;0 1];!• To multiply: K*inv(chol(M))!
© D.J. Inman 57/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
An alternate approach to normalizing mode shapes
From equation (4.17) −Mω 2 + K( )u = 0, u ≠ 0
Now scale the mode shapes by computing α such that
α iui( )T M α iui( ) = 1⇒α i =1uiTui
wi = α iui is called mass normalized and it satisfies:−ω i
2Mwi + Kwi = 0 ⇒ω i2 = wi
T Kwi , i = 1,2
(4.53)
© D.J. Inman 58/58 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
There are 3 approaches to computing mode shapes and frequencies (i) ω
2 Mu = Ku (ii) ω 2u = M −1Ku (iii) ω 2v = M−1
2 KM−1
2 v
(i) Is the Generalized Symmetric Eigenvalue Problem easy for hand computations, inefficient for computers
(ii) Is the Asymmetric Eigenvalue Problem
very expensive computationally (iii) Is the Symmetric Eigenvalue Problem
the cheapest computationally