Cervical Spine Injuries Classification and Non-operative Treatment Dr. Heather Roche Dec. 12, 2002.
Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation
-
Upload
upender-satelli -
Category
Health & Medicine
-
view
2.246 -
download
4
Transcript of Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation
![Page 1: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
CERVICAL SPINE INJURIES
By Dr.Upender satelliPG IN (MS ORTHO)Gandhi medical college
![Page 2: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
EPIDEMIOLOGY
~ 40 % of all spinal trauma is found in the polytrauma patient
2-3 % of all polytrauma victims have associated cervical spine injuries
~30,000 cervical spine injuries are documented annually
Most common site ---- cervical 60%,thoraco lumbar junction 20%, thoracic15%, lumbo sacral spine 5%
16% people will have non-contiguous spine fractures
50% will have other skeletal or visceral injuries
![Page 3: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
5% unstable 2/3rd of this do not have neurolgical
deficit Most common missed severe injury Commonly missed in
polytrauma,unconscious pts
![Page 4: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
ET IOLOGY
Most frequent cause motor vehicle crashes 37.4%
violence -25.9%, Falls- 21.5%, sports, other Severity of injury –complete quadriplegia
(23.3%),quadriparesis( 30.2%),paraplegia 26.1%,paraparasis(19.7%)
![Page 5: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
AGE & SEX
Mean age is 32 yrs Highest incidence-16-30 yrs Male :female ratio 3:1 Elderly more likely to have SCI than
young more due to falls rather than violence & sports
![Page 6: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
MORTALITY
Life expectancy decreases with severity &age of pt
Least in ventilatory dependent pts Greater who survive 1 yr after spinal
injury During 1 st yr cause of death are –
respiratory& cardiac cause Mortlity decreased but life expectancy
decreses
![Page 7: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
ATLS
Airway Breathing Circulation // Cervical spine -----------------------------------Field intubation: Avoid head tilt / chin
liftEarly identification of SCI ‘in the field’
---Avoid hypotension and hypoxia
![Page 8: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
ATLSSECONDARY SURVEY
Disability---complete neuro exam Motor/ sensory/ reflexes Perineal sensory/ anal wink/
bulbocavern. reflex Exposure
Fully disrobe and log roll Direct palpation of spine, collar
removed Fracture identification
![Page 9: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
![Page 10: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
SPINAL BOARD
![Page 11: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
H ISTORY A detailed history of the mechanism of injury is important, but
frequently is unobtainable at the initial examination.
suspected in any patient with a head injury or severe facial or scalp lacerations.
In any patient with recent trauma, complaints of neck pain or spinal pain should be considered indicative of a spinal injury until proved otherwise.
Other risk factors associated with spinal injury, , include an inability to assess neck pain because of a secondary distracting injury,
abnormal neurological findings,
history of transient neurological symptoms,
physical signs of spinal trauma (e.g., ecchymosis and abrasions), unreliable examination
inconsolable child
![Page 12: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION
supine. mental status also should be assessed
The head – for lacerations and contusions and palpated for facial fractures.
The ear canals should be inspected to rule out leakage of spinal fluid or blood behind the tympanic membrane, which is suggestive of a skull fracture.
The spinous processes should be palpated from the upper cervical to the lumbosacral region. A painful spinous process may indicate a spinal injury.
Palpable defects in the interspinous ligaments may indicate disruption of the supporting ligamentous complex.
![Page 13: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
![Page 14: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
• tenderness on palpation of the cervical spine should be considered indicative of a spinal injury requiring collar immobilization.
• neck motion should not be evaluated until the spine is cleared. Neck motion should be undertaken only after the patient reports no pain or tenderness during examination of the neck.
•An assistant should hold the neck steady in a neutral position while it is being palpated. The neck also should be held steady while the torso and the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spinal areas are exposed for inspection and palpation
•. Sensation to light touch should be documented comparing each spinal level. Pinprick sensibility should be determined with a sterile needle if necessary•. Motor strength should be examined sequentially.• Deep tendon reflexes and pathological reflexes also should be checked.
• Motor and sensory evaluation of the rectum and perirectal area is mandatory.
• The patient should be evaluated for posturing. The elbows may be flexed if a spinal cord injury causes loss of function below the biceps, or they may be extended if the paralysis is higher.• Penile erection and incontinence of the bowel or bladder suggest a significant spinal injury. Quadriplegia is indicated by flaccid paralysis of the extremities.
![Page 15: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
•Initial blood pressure may be decreased without a compensatory increase in pulse because of spinal cord shock.• BRADYCARDIA OR EPISODES OF ASYSTOLE MAY BE THE ONLY FINDING OF SIGNIFICANT INJURY TO THE AXIAL REGION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE.
•The chest, abdomen, and extremities should be examined for occult injuries.
•The spine should be protected during this initial assessment;
![Page 16: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
NEUROLOGICAL EVALUATION The patient's mental status and the level of consciousness should be
determined quickly, including pupillary size and reaction –G L A S G O W C O M A S C A L E
Eyes Open Spontaneous 4 To sound 3 To pain 2 Never 1 Best Verbal Response Oriented 5 Confused conversation 4 Inappropriate words 3 Incomprehensible words 2 None 1 Best Motor Response Obeys commands 6 Localizes pain 5 Flexion withdrawal 4 Abnormal 3 Extension 2 None 1
![Page 17: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
SENSORY EXAMINATION
performed with light touch, then pinpricks (using a sterile needle), beginning at the head and neck and progressing distally, to examine specific dermatome distributions
Important dermatome landmarks are the nipple line (T4), xiphoid process (T7), umbilicus (T10), inguinal region (T12, L1), perineum and perianal region (S2, S3, and S4).
The skin should be marked where sensation is present before proceeding to motor examination.
Evidence of sacral sensory sparing establishes the diagnosis of an incomplete spinal cord injury.
The only area of sensation distal to an obvious cervical lesion in a quadriplegic patient may be in the perianal region
![Page 18: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
![Page 19: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
MOTOR EXAMINAT ION should be systematic, beginning with the upper extremities. complete / incomplete spinal cord injuries /pure nerve root
lesions. A protruded cervical disc /unilateral dislocated facet may
produce an isolated nerve root paralysis. key muscle groups and their corresponding nerve root levels +/- of sacral motor sparing should be determined by voluntary
rectal sphincter / toe flexor contractions. If voluntary contraction of the sacrally innervated muscles is
present with sacral sensation, the prognosis for recovery of motor function is good.
+ OF anal reflex without sacral sensation is consistent with a complete injury
Finally, reflexes should be documented. Paralyzed patients usually are areflexic, and flexion
withdrawal of the legs to pinprick does not indicate voluntary motion. Hyperreflexia, clonus, and pathological reflexes, such as a Babinsky reflex in the lower extremities or a Hoffman sign in the upper extremities, indicate chronic spinal cord compression. This may be @ the findings of a central cord syndrome.
![Page 20: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
KEY MUSCLE GROUPS
C5 ---Elbow flexors (biceps, brachialis) C6--- Wrist extensors (extensor carpi radialis longus
and brevis) C7-- Elbow extensors (triceps) C8 ---Finger flexors (flexor digitorum profundus to
the middle finger) T1 ---Small finger abductors (abductor digiti minimi) L2 ---Hip flexors (iliopsoas) L3--- Knee extensors (quadriceps) L4 ---Ankle dorsiflexors (tibialis anterior) L5 ---Long toe extensors (extensor hallucis longus) S1 ----Ankle plantarflexors (gastrocnemius, soleus)
![Page 21: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Myotomes
![Page 22: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Although spinal shock generally resolves within 24 hours, it may last longer. A positive bulbocavernosus reflex /return of the anal wink reflex indicates the end of spinal shock.
If no motor or sensory function below the level of injury can be documented when spinal shock ends, a complete spinal cord injury is present, and the prognosis is poor for recovery of distal motor or sensory function.
![Page 23: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
ANAL WINK
BULBOCAVERNOUS REFLEX
GLANS COMPRESSION
ANAL SPHINCTER CONTRACTION
![Page 24: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
![Page 25: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
American Spinal Injury Association Scale: Classification of Spinal Cord Injuries According to the Level of Impairment
Grade Motor Score* Sensory Deficit*
A 0/5 Complete
B 0/5 Incomplete
C <3/5 Incomplete
D >3/5 Incomplete
E 5/5 None
![Page 26: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
SPINAL CORD INJURIESTERMINOLOGY
Neurological level = most caudal segment with normal sensori-motor exam- bilaterally
Complete SCI = absence of sensori-motor function in the lowest sacral segment
Incomplete SCI = partial preservation of sensory and/or motor below the defined neurological level, includes the lowest sacral segment
![Page 27: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
SPINAL CORD INJURIESTERMINOLOGY
Neurogenic shock = immediate loss of sympathetic tone after SCI. Loss of vasomotor and cardiac innervation. Clinically: hypotension w/out tachycardic response Fluid resus.; may need vasopressor augment
Spinal shock = transient period of areflexia. While in shock, unable to predict likelihood of recovery . Rarely > 48 hours
![Page 28: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
INCOMPLETE CORD SYNDROMES
CENTRAL CORD SYNDROME BROWN SEQUARD CORD SYNDROME ANTERIOR CORD SYNDROME POSTERIOR CORD SYNDROME Cauda equina syndrome Conus medullaris syndrome
![Page 29: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
CENTRAL CORD SYNDROMEmost common. destruction of the central area of the spinal cord,
including gray and white matter centrally located arm tracts in the cortical spinal
area are the most severely affected, and the leg tracts are affected to a lesser extent.
Generally, patients have a quadriparesis involving the upper extremities to a greater degree than the lower. Sensory sparing varies, but usually sacral pinprick sensation is preserved.
frequently show immediate partial recovery after being placed in skeletal traction through skull tongs.
Prognosis varies, but more than 50% of patients have return of bowel and bladder control, become ambulatory, and have improved hand function.
usually results from a hyperextension injury in an older individual with preexisting osteoarthritis of the spine.
The spinal cord is pinched between the vertebral body anteriorly and the buckling ligamentum flavum posteriorly
It also may occur in younger patients with flexion injuries.
![Page 30: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
BROWN SEQUARD SYNDROME
is an injury to either half of the spinal cord usually is the result of a unilateral laminar or pedicle fracture, penetrating
injury, / rotational injury resulting in a subluxation.
SENSORY:
Ipsilateral loss of proprioception due to posterior column involvement.
Contralateral loss of pain and temperature due to involvement of lateral
spinothalamic tract.
MOTOR:
Ipsilateral spastic weakness due to descending corticospinal tract
involvement
LMN signs at the level of lesion.
Prognosis for recovery is good, with significant neurological improvement often occurring
![Page 31: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
ANTERIOR CORD SYNDROME
hyperflexion injury in which bone or disc fragments compress the anterior spinal artery and cord.
characterized by complete motor loss and loss of pain and temperature discrimination
below the level of injury. The posterior columns are spared to varying
degrees resulting in preservation of deep touch, position sense, and vibratory sensation.
Prognosis is poor.
![Page 32: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
POSTERIOR CORD SYNDROME
Involve dorsal columns
SENSORY :
Impaired position and vibration sense in LL
Tactile and postural hallucinations can occur.
Numbness or paresthesia are frequent complaints..
Sensory ataxia.
Positive rhomberg sign.
Positive lhermittes sign. es the dorsal columns of the spinal
cord
Urinary incontinence
Absent knee and ankle jerk (Areflexia, Hypotonia
![Page 33: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
CONUS MEDULLARIS & CAUDA EQUINA SYNDROMES
![Page 34: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
CM: Lies opposite to vertebral bodies of T12 and L1.
Contributes to 25% of spinal cord injuries.
Caused by flexion distraction injuries and burst fractures.
Both UMN and LMN deficits occur.
Development of neurogenic bladder.
CONUS MEDULLARIS SYNDROME
![Page 35: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
CE: Begins at L2 disk space distal
to conus medullaris.
CE syndrome occurs due to:
Acute disk herniation
Epidural haematoma
Tumour
CAUDA EQUINA SYNDROME
![Page 36: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
MOTOR :
Flaccid lower extremities.
Knee and ankle jerk absent.
SENSORY :
Asymmetrical sensory loss
Saddle anaesthesia
Loss of sensation around perineum, anus, genitals.
CAUDA EQUINA SYNDROME
![Page 37: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
AUTONOMIC:
Loss of bladder and bowel function.
Urinary retention.
CAUDA EQUINA SYNDROME
![Page 38: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
DDX: CONUS VS CAUDA
FEATURE CONUS MEDULARIS CAUDA EQUINA
PRESENTATION Sudden & Bilateral Gradual & Unilateral
REFLEXES Knee present, Ankle –
(If the epiconus is
involved, patellar reflex
maybe absent but
bulbocavernosus is
spared)
Knee & Ankle –
Bulbocavernosus reflex
is absent in low CE
(sacral) lesions
RADICULAR PAIN Less severe More severe
LOW BACK ACHE More Less
![Page 39: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
FEATURE CONUS MEDULARIS CAUDA EQUINA
SENSORY SYMPTOMS
Numbness tends to be more localized to perianal area; symmetrical and bilateral; sensory dissociation occurs.
Sensory loss of pin prick & temperature sensations (Tactile sensation is spared.)
Numbness tends to be more localized to saddle area; asymmetrical, maybe unilateral; no sensory dissociation; loss of sensation in specific dermatomes in lower extremities with numbness and paresthesia; possible numbness in pubic area, including glans penis or clitoris.
![Page 40: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
FEATURE CONUS MEDULARIS CAUDA EQUINA
MOTOR SYMPTOMS
Typically symmetric, distal paresis of lower limbs that is less marked; fasciculations may be present.
Asymmetric areflexic paraplegia that is more marked; fasciculations rare; atrophy more common .
IMPOTENCE Frequent Less frequent; ED is commonerectile dysfunction that includes inability to have erection, inability to maintain erection, lack of sensation in pubic area (including glans penis or clitoris), and inability to ejaculate.
![Page 41: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
FEATURE CONUS MEDULARIS CAUDA EQUINA
SPHINCTER
DYSFUNCTION
Urinary retention and
atonic anal sphincter
cause overflow
urinary incontinence
and fecal
incontinence
Tend to present
early in course of
disease.
Urinary retention
Tends to present late in
course of disease
EMG Mostly normal lower
extremity with
external anal
sphincter invlmnt
Multiple root level
involvement; sphincters
may also be involved.
OUTCOME Less favourable More Favourable
![Page 42: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
TO X-RAY OR NOT TO X-RAY Canadian C-Spine
Rules NEXUS study(a) midline pain or bony
tenderness, crepitus, or step-off;
(b) neurologic deficit; (c) presence of
distracting injuries; (d) altered mental
status (including intoxication);
(e) complaint of paresthesia or numbness
![Page 43: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
IMAGING MODALITIES
Plain films – Lateral, AP, and Odontoid
CT
MRI
![Page 44: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
LATERAL
TO BE ADEQUATE: :OCCIPUT
ALL 7 VERTEBRAE
SUP. ENDPLATE OF T1 this is main view Where 90% lesions are detected
Adequacy Alignment Bones Cartilage
Soft Tissue
![Page 45: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
ALIGNMENT
![Page 46: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
BONES
![Page 47: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
CARTILAGE
Predental Space should be no more than 3 mm in adults and 5 mm in children
Increased distance may indicate fracture of odontoid or transverse ligament injury
Disc Spaces Should be uniform
Assess spaces between the spinous processes
![Page 48: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
LATERAL VIEW: C1 AND C2
Basion-dens distance: average 8mm, top normal 12mm.
C1: Anterior and posterior arch.
C2: Dens, Harris’ ring, body especially ant/inf corner, pars and posterior arch.
![Page 49: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
PREDENTAL SPACE
In an adult, upper normal is 2.5mm. Space is parallel or narrow “V” shape.
In a young child, upper normal is 4.5mm.
increase in predental space suspect jafferson #
![Page 50: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
LATERAL VIEW: PREDENTAL SPACE
![Page 51: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
![Page 52: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
PRE VERTEBRAL SOFT TISSUE SHADOWS
Nasopharyngeal space (C1) - 10 mm (adult)
Retropharyngeal space (C2-C4) - 5-7 mm
Retrotracheal space (C5-C7) - 14 mm (children), 22 mm (adults)
Extremely variable and nonspecific
Contour is more important than measurements
![Page 53: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
The laminar space is the distance from the posterior aspect of the articular pillars (1) to the spinolaminar line (2indicate rotational injuries of the cervical
spine
displacement in this line may be an indication of subtle traumatic vertebral injury/dislocation. A line (white line in B) drawn through C1-3 spinolaminar lines (white dots in A) should intercept the C2 spinolaminar line. A displacement of the C2 spinolaminar line of more than 2 mm, compared with a line drawn between the spinolaminar lines of C1 and C3, is abnormal
![Page 54: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
The normal AP diameter of the cervical canal is stated to be 12 to 21 mm.
anteroposterior width of the canal with that of the vertebral body. The normal ratio of the spinal canal (white arrow) to the vertebral body (black arrow) is 0.8 or more.
![Page 55: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
AP VIEW
ASSESS FOR: ALIGNMENT SYMMETRY OF PEDICLES CONTOUR OF BODIES HEIGHT OF DISC SPACES CENTRAL POSITION OF SPINOUS PROCESSES
FACET JOINTS ORIENTED AT 45 DEGREE ANGLE FROM CORONAL PLANE -- THUS NOT SEEN ON AP
IF FACET IS CLEARLY IDENTIFIED ON AP, ARTICULAR PILLAR OR PEDICLE FX WITH ROTATION IS LIKELY
![Page 56: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
AP VIEW
Spinous processes should line up.
Disc space should be uniform
Vertebral body height should be uniform. Check for oblique fractures.
![Page 57: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
ODONTOID VIEW/OPEN MOUTH VIEW
Adequacy: all of the dens and lateral borders of C1 & C2
Alignment: lateral masses of C1 and C2
Bone: Inspect dens for lucent fracture lines
![Page 58: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
A+B > 7mm indicates rupture of transverse ligament
![Page 59: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Reverse Waters view is supplementary, to see top half of dens ONLY.
![Page 60: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
FLEXION-EXTENSION FILMS
May be helpful in ligament injuries
-but are-
Frequently useless due to muscle spasm
Should not be done in acute setting
![Page 61: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
FLEXION-EXTENSION FILMS
Rules: Patient must be alert, awake, not intoxicated, able to sit or stand, able to understand commands, and without neurologic deficit.
![Page 62: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
SWIMMER’S VIEW
A SUPPLEMENTARY view to see C7-T1 in lateral projection. NOT a substitute for a bad lateral. One arm must be elevated, so THEORETICALLY could worsen a mechanical or neurological injury.
A state-of-the-art CT sagittal reformat is preferable: don’t need to move patient and imaging easier and better.
![Page 63: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
CT: SAGITTAL REFORMATTING
Reconstructed by computer from axial data: no additional imaging needed.
Outstanding “lateral/swimmer’s” imaging.
![Page 64: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
CT: CORONAL REFORMATTING
Excellent “OMO”
Excellent “AP”
![Page 65: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
INDICATION OF CT CERVICAL SPINE 1. Alert, cervical tenderness, paresthesias in
hands or feet.
2. Unconscious
3. Impaired sensorium (including alcohol and/or drugs).
4. Impaired sensorium (alcohol and/or drugs), neurologic findings.
![Page 66: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Uncertain plain radiographic findings In presence of osseous injury by plain films to
provide details & aid in surgeryplanning inadequate visualization by plain films Localize foreign bodies& bone fragments in
neural elements Pts having high risk of spinal injury, fall from
height from 10 feet,closed head injury Pts with neurologic findings,negative plain films,
negative non contrast CT where MRI is not feasible
![Page 67: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
MRI
Gold standard for cord, thecal sac, nerve root and disc injuries.
Very good for ligament injuries.
Fairly good for fractures, but does miss some. CT much better.
![Page 68: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
MULTIPLE SPINAL #
If a spinal fracture is identified at any level, the entire spine should be examined with anteroposterior and lateral views to document the presence or absence of spinal fractures at other levels
![Page 69: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
In pattern A, the primary lesion occurs
between C5 and C7, with secondary injuries at T12 or the lumbar spine.
In pattern B, the primary injury occurs at
T2 and T4, with secondary injuries in the cervical spine.
In pattern C, the primary injury occurs
between T12 and L2, with secondary injuries from L4 to L5
![Page 70: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
![Page 71: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
![Page 72: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
CERVICAL INJURIES
Common MOIs Axial Loading Flexion Force Hyperextension Force Flexion-Rotation Force Hyperextension-Rotation Lateral Flexion
![Page 73: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
C-SPINE/NECK INJURIES
Cervical Strain Active motion most painful
Cervical Sprain (Whiplash) Passive and active motion painful
Torticollis (WryNeck) Muscle spasm and facet irritation
Brachial Plexus Stretch or Compression Contusions to Throat
![Page 74: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
C-SPINE INJURIES
Cervical Fracture or Dislocation Weakness or Paralysis
Cervical Nerve Root Injury Herniated Disc Laceration Cord Shock (Central Cord
Syndrome) Hemorrhage Contusion Cervical Stenosis
![Page 75: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
CERVICAL SPINE CURVATURE
Normal cervical spine has lordotic curve
Increased lordotic curve (forward head) indicative of poor posture and muscular weakness or imbalance
Lessened lordotic curve indicative of muscular spasm/guarding and/or nerve root impingement
![Page 76: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
ASSOCIATED SOFT TISSUE INJURY
Carotid and vertebral artery injuries have been found to be alarmingly frequent with cervical spinal injuries. This injury is associated with a small but potentially devastating risk of stroke or death
Tracheal injuiry
![Page 77: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
WHIPLASH INJURY
Caused due to sudden deceleration injury
Sudden stopping of a moving vehicle The head goes into hyperflexion and
then hyper extension
![Page 78: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
WHIPLASH CAN CAUSE
Rupture of interspinous ligaments in the posterior side of c-spine
Unlocking of facet joints Rupture of disc or fracture of vertebrae
anteriorly
![Page 79: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
![Page 80: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
CLINICAL FEATURES
Severe neck pain and stiffness May present with quadreplegia X-ray may be normal M R I – may show the soft tissue injury and
hemorrhage below the longitudinal ligaments
May present with quadreplegia with out any radiological changes – due to cord contusion
![Page 81: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
TREATMENT
Cervical traction Anti – edema measures Immobilization Wait for the neurological recovery
![Page 82: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
THE INJURIES
C1 and C2: by anatomic location
C3 to T1: by mechanism of injury
(Modified from the classification of John Harris, et al.)
![Page 83: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
ATLANTOOCCIPITO DISSOCIATION
Often fatal but in children survivable complete disruption of all ligamentous relationships between the occiput
and the atlas
Death usually occurs immediately from stretching of the brainstem, which can result in respiratory arresttation & Distraction
ICA & vertebral injuries are common Fatal cases often show contusions in pons, medulla ,spinal cord Neurological Deficits Confusing
High Tetraplegia Cruciate Paralysis Wallenberg’s Syndrome
Avoid Traction Always severe retropharyngeal swelling Distance from basion to odontoid < 12mm
![Page 84: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
The Power ratio is calculated by dividing the distance between the basion and the posterior C1 arch by the distance between the opisthion and the anterior C1 arch.
A ratio greater than 1 is suggestive of an atlanto-occipital dislocation.
Harris measurements, also known as the “rule of twelve,” include the BAI (basion-axis interval) and the BDI (basion-dens interval). The BAI is the measured distance between the basion and a perpendicular line drawn in relation to the posterior vertebral body tangent line of C2. The BDI is the measured distance between the basion and the tip of dens. Both distances should normally be less than 12 mL.
![Page 85: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION
![Page 86: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/86.jpg)
TREATMENT
Non operative; Halovest Operative stabilization with a plate-screw-rod
construct and fusion with iliac crest bone graft.
![Page 87: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/87.jpg)
THE ATLAS AND THE AXIS
C1 and C2 injuries differ from the rest of the cervical spine and are considered separately.
Although controversial, best to consider ALL C1 and C2 injuries as UNSTABLE in the acute trauma setting.
![Page 88: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/88.jpg)
THE ATLAS: C1
Anterior arch fracture: extension, uncommon.
Posterior arch fracture: extension, more common.
JEFFERSON fracture: axial load, common
![Page 89: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/89.jpg)
C1: ISOLATED ARCH FRACTURES
Anterior arch Posterior arch CAUTION: You may be
dealing with a Jefferson fracture with occult components:
Best to CT all C1 fractures.
Non operative if no instability
![Page 90: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/90.jpg)
JEFFERSON FRACTURE: C1
Axial loading/burst #
Lateral view: anterior and posterior arch fractures
OMO view: lateral displacement of C1 lateral masses
The lateral masses of C1 and C2 must be aligned on the OMO view.
1-2mm of lateral displacement on one side and an EQUAL medial displacement on the other is head rotation.
ANY other pattern: lateral displacement on both sides or lateral on one side, and none on the other is abnormal.
cord injury in 15% cases
![Page 91: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/91.jpg)
JEFFERSON FRACTURE CT
Classical Jefferson: 4 fractures, 2 ant./2 post.
Jefferson variants: 2 or 3 fractures, but at least 1 ant. & 1 post.
The distinction between stable and unstable Jefferson or burst fractures is the integrity of the transverse ligaments. The transverse ligament is disrupted in tension with lateral displacement of the fragment fragments, which can lead to C1-C2 instability
![Page 92: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/92.jpg)
TREATMENT
Stable Jefferson or burst fractures can be treated nonoperatively in a rigid cervical collar for 8 to 12 weeks.
Unstable fractures can be reduced in halo traction, followed by placement in a halo vest
Surgery Posterior atlantoaxial stabilization and fusion is an effective treatment of residual C1-C2 instability
![Page 93: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/93.jpg)
THE AXIS: C2
Odontoid fractures
Pars fractures Extension
teardrop fractures
![Page 94: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/94.jpg)
ODONTOID#
Complex mechanism of injury
Generally unstable
![Page 95: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/95.jpg)
ANDERSON & D’ALONZO CLASSIFICATION (JBJS, 1974)
Type I 1 fracture through the tip
rare
Rigid cervical collar for 8 wks
Type II Type 2 fracture through the base
Most common
Type III Type 3 fracture through the base and body of axis
Best prognosis
![Page 96: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/96.jpg)
TREATMENT
type I-hard cervical collar for eight weeks Most nondisplaced type II fractures in young
patients are treated in halo vest most nondisplaced type III fractures are
treated a hard cervical collar. Displaced type II and III fractures in young
patients are first reduced using halo traction. posterior C1-C2 stabilization and fusion in
those with neurological deficits
![Page 97: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/97.jpg)
C2: PARS FRACTURE/HANGMANS#
Called Hangman’s or pedicle fracture, both wrong.
Extension injury. Cord injury in 15%. Non-displaced,
displaced, subluxed.
![Page 98: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/98.jpg)
![Page 99: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/99.jpg)
LEVINE & EDWARDS CLASSIFIACTION type I is a minimally or nondisplaced with no evidence of translation or angulation and thus no substantial injury to the C2-C3 disc space.
Type II both angulation and translation and presumably occur from an extensions mechanism. They incur substantial injury to the C2-C3 interspace. In contrast,
type IIa fractures occur via a flexion mechanism and are characterized by marked angulation with minimal translational deformity.
Type III fractures include any C2 pars fracture associated with a dislocation of the C2-C3 facet joint
![Page 100: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/100.jpg)
TREATMENT
Type 1 rigid cervical orthosis
Type 2 closed reduction with traction and position opposite direction
instability halo vest immobilization follow for loss of reduction
Type 3 reduction of facet dislocation with traction early posterior open reduction and fixation using lateral mass
screw fixation of C2 and C3 C2 -C3 fusion after pre-op MRI
![Page 101: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/101.jpg)
C2: EXTENSION TEARDROP FRACTURE
Avulsion by the anterior longitudinal ligament of the anterior-inferior corner of the body.
Extension mechanism.
Cord injury is low. Unstable.
![Page 102: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/102.jpg)
LOWER CERVICAL SPINE C3-C7CLASSIFICATIONFERGUSON AND ALLEN
Based on position of neck at time of injury and dominant force
2 column theory everything anterior to PLL ant column
most patients have a combination of patterns
![Page 103: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/103.jpg)
1.COMPRESSION FLEXIONCF Stage 1: Blunting of the anterosuperior vertebral body margin
CF Stage 2: Beak-appearance of the anterosuperior vertebral body margin, a sagittal vertebral body split may also be present
CF Stage 3: Oblique primary fracture line that extends from the anterior vertebral body to the inferior endplate.
CF Stage 4: In addition to stage 3 features, posterior translation of the upper vertebra measuring less than 3 mm
CF Stage 5: Posterior translation of the upper vertebral measuring 3 mm or greater, facet gapping, indicating anterior and posterior ligamentous injury
![Page 104: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/104.jpg)
COMPRESSION AND FLEXION
Level C4-5 and C5-6 compression of ant column and distraction of
post different stages with later stages having
more post involvement and displacement of vertebral body
MRI to evaluate post ligaments intact - HALO sufficient not - risk of late kyphotic deformity
therefore fusion
![Page 105: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/105.jpg)
VERTICAL COMPRESSION
VC Stage 1: Central superior or inferior endplate fracture
VC Stage 2: Superior and inferior endplate fractures, sometimes with vertebral body fracture lines that give the appearance of a quadrangular fracture fragment
VC Stage 3: Vertebral body comminution, with or without retropulsion of fragments
(This has been by others as a burst-type cervical fracture), with or without kyphotic (late flexion type) or translational (late extension type) deformity
![Page 106: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/106.jpg)
2.VERTICAL COMPRESSION
C6-7 most common shortening of ant and post columns stage 1 -
cupping of end plate with partial failure anteriorly and normal post ligaments
rigid orthosis
stage 3 - fragmentation and displacement of body “ burst” neurologic injury common with assoc post element
fractures anterior corpectomy and reconstruction for neuro
recovery plus post fusion to prevent kyphosis
![Page 107: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/107.jpg)
VERTICAL COMPRESSION
“Burst” fractures explode the body.
All are very unstable and cause cord injury in 2/3 (except C1).
There is usually an element of flexion also.
![Page 108: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/108.jpg)
BURST FRACTURES
On lateral, body is compressed anteriorly, inferior end plate often fractured, posterior body contour is convex. On AP, body fracture is vertical or oblique and pedicles spread.
![Page 109: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/109.jpg)
BURST FRACTURES
CT more accurately displays the fracture pattern and the very important degree of narrowing of the spinal canal.
![Page 110: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/110.jpg)
3.DISTRACTIVE FLEXION
DF Stage 1: Facet subluxation, gapping of the spinous process ligaments, indicating failure of the PLC, with or without some blunting of anterosuperior vertebral body (like CF stage 1)
DF Stage 2: Unilateral facet dislocation, usually PLC is intact, rotational
deformity
DF Stage 3: Bilateral facet dislocations, 50% translation of upper vertebral body on lower one
DF Stage 4: Close to 100% translation of upper vertebral body on lower one, apperance of a so-called floating vertebra
![Page 111: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/111.jpg)
DISTRACTION FLEXION
Most common pattern tensile failure and lengthening of post
column with possible compression of ant column
ant translation superior vertebra 25% facet subluxation 50% unilateral facet dislocation > 50% bilateral dislocation full body displacement
![Page 112: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/112.jpg)
FLEXION DISTRACTION
50-80% assoc acute disk herniation at level of injury
awake closed reduction has not shown worsening of neuro deficit and should not undergo major delay in reduction while waiting for MRI
MRI prerequisite to open reduction Disk present ant cervical diskectomy prior to
reduction
![Page 113: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/113.jpg)
TREATMENT
Closed reduction initially max weight controversial
successful non-operative treatment 64% late
instability fusion recommended
unsuccessful open reduction and fusion
![Page 114: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/114.jpg)
UNILATERAL INTERFACETAL DISLOCATION
UID is not stable, as the contralateral capsule ligaments are torn.
Cord injury is uncommon, but root injury is common,
Findings can be subtle: less than 50% subluxation, malalignment of spinous processes.
![Page 115: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/115.jpg)
CT: THIS IS A NORMAL FACET JOINT, NORMAL “HAMBURGER SIGN”
![Page 116: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/116.jpg)
UID
CT: UID has “reversed hamburger sign” of facet joint.
CT is also more sensitive for associated lateral mass fractures.
![Page 117: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/117.jpg)
UID
Oblique view
CT Sagittal Reformat
![Page 118: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/118.jpg)
REDUCTION MANOUVRE
![Page 119: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/119.jpg)
BILATERAL INTERFACETAL DISLOCATION
BID, also called “locked facets” is anything but locked. It is a severe 3 column injury that is completely unstable.
Cord is injured in 2/3. Body is subluxed
anteriorly at least 50%. Marked posterior
distraction.
![Page 120: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/120.jpg)
4.COMPRESSIVE EXTENSION
CE Stage 1: Posterior arch fracture that may be facet, pedicle, or lamina fracture, with or without rotation that can result in mild anterior translation. (These are more commonly referred to as lateral mass fractures.)CE Stage 2: Bilateral lamina fractures, can be multiple levels
CE Stage 3: Bilateral lamina, facet, pedicle fractures without vertebral body displacement. Although admittedly “hypothetical… having not been encountered” in their review, the injury may be described as a floating lateral mass fracture
CE Stage 4: As for CF stage 3, with partial anterior vertebral body displacement
CE Stage 5: As for CF stage 3, with 100% anterior vertebral body displacement
![Page 121: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/121.jpg)
POSTERIOR ARCH FRACTURES
Plain films are insensitive, CT is outstanding.
Isolated: pedicle, lateral mass, lamina or spinous process.
Multiple fractures are common. Pedicle/lamina fractures cause free-floating lateral mass.
May be additional element of lateral bending.
Stability depends on what is fractured.
![Page 122: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/122.jpg)
5.DISTRACTIVE EXTENSION
DE Stage 1: Abnormal widening of the disc space, may or may not be avulsion fractures of the anterior vertebral body margin, no posterior translation
DE Stage 2: DF stage 1 plus posterior translation
![Page 123: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/123.jpg)
CHILDREN
Cervical spine fractures are uncommon in children. The overall incidence of spinal fractures in pediatric trauma patients is <1%
In addition, the injury patterns are different, with cranio-cervical junction injuries being more prevalent in this group
![Page 124: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/124.jpg)
![Page 125: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/125.jpg)
CSI IS RARE IN CHILDREN: 1% OF ALL PEDS FRACTURES AND 2% OF ALL SPINE FRACTURES
BY AGE 8-10, NO ANATOMICAL OR BIOMECHANICAL DIFFERENCES
PEDS < 10 Y.O. ARE FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT DUE TO ANATOMICAL VARIATIONS OF THE DEVELOPING SPINE, AND TO A LESSER EXTENT, THE DIFFERENCES IN MECHANISMS OF INJURY
INHERENTLY MORE MOBILE:
GENERALIZED LAXITY OF INTERSPINOUS LIGAMENTS AND JOINT CAPSULES
THICK CARTILAGINOUS ENDPLATES
INCOMPLETE VERTEBRAL OSSIFICATION (WEDGE-SHAPED VERTEBRAL BODIES)
SHALLOW ANGLED FACET JOINTS, ESPECIALLY B/W OCCIPUT AND C4
HEAD DISPROPORTIONATELY LARGE
![Page 126: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/126.jpg)
![Page 127: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/127.jpg)
PSEUDOSUBLUXATIONPERSISTENT SYNCHONDROSESANTERIOR ANGULATION OF DENSFOCAL KYPHOSIS OF MID-CERVICAL SPINEDIFFERENT SOFT TISSUE MEASUREMENTS
PEAD ANATOMIC VARIANTS -NON TRAUMATIC INJURY
![Page 128: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/128.jpg)
SCIWORA
DEFINED BY PANG AND WILBERGER, 1982: “Objective Signs Of Myelopathy As A Result Of Trauma With No Evidence Of Fracture Or Ligamentous Instability On Plain Xray And
Tomography”
FINDING OF FRACTURE, SUBLUXATION, OR ABNORMAL INTERSEGMENTAL MOTION AT LEVEL OF NEUROLOGICAL INJURY EXCLUDES SCIWORA AS A DIAGNOSIS
![Page 129: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/129.jpg)
EXPERIMENTALLY, OSTEOCARTILAGINOUS STRUCTURES IN SPINAL COLUMN CAN STRETCH 2 INCHES WITHOUT DISRUPTION -- SPINAL CORD RUPTURES AFTER 1/4 INCH
ANATOMICALLY, CERVICAL SPINAL CORD IS RELATIVELY TETHERED - SPINAL NERVES, DURAL ATTACHMENT TO FORAMEN MAGNUM, AND BRACHIAL PLEXUS
![Page 130: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/130.jpg)
SPECIAL CONSIDERATION
SCIWORA = Spinal Cord Injury Without Radiographic Abnormalities Children have vertebrae that can dislocate
and quickly relocate. Cord gets damaged but shows an aligned vertebral column.
Cord can be transected or compressed.
![Page 131: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/131.jpg)
STABILITY OF SPINE
![Page 132: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/132.jpg)
THREE COLUMN THEORY OF DENIS
Spinal column divided into 3 columns; Anterior column; The anterior longitudinal ligament,
anterior 2/3 of the body and disc. Middle column; Posterior longitudinal ligament and
posterior 1/3 of body and disc. posteriorcolumn; The posterior osseous arch and
ligaments.
Injury to one column is stable, two or three are unstable.
![Page 133: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/133.jpg)
DOES IT WORK?
If two or three columns injured, lesion is unstable: Works well for C3 to T1.
Does not work so well for C1-2, so consider most or all injuries here unstable.
![Page 134: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/134.jpg)
PANJABI AND WHITE: CLINICAL INSTABILITY IN THE LOWER CERVICAL SPINE
Anterior elements Destroyed or Unable to Function 2 Posterior Elements Destroyed of Unable to Function2 Relative Sagittal Plane Translation > 3.5mm 2 Relative Sagittal Plane Rotation > 11deg 2 Positive Stretch Test 2 Medullary (Cord) Damage 2 Root Damage 1 Abnormal Disc Narrowing 1 Dangerous Loading Anticipated 1
TOTAL OF 5 OR MORE = UNSTABLE
![Page 135: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/135.jpg)
PLAIN RADIOGRAPHY & CT - INSTABILITY
Anterior translation of the vertebral body a distance >3.5 mm relative to the subjacent vertebra
▪ Vertebral body shows > 20 degrees of angulation relative to the adjacent vertebra
▪ Vertebral body shows >11 degrees of angulation relative to the adjacent vertebral body pairs
▪ Increase in atlantoaxial distance (>3 mm) ▪ Hangman fracture with >3 mm of fragment
displacement or >a 15-degree angle at the fracture site ▪ Hangman fracture with abnormal C2-3 disc space or
with C2-3 dislocation ▪ Anterior or posterior displacement of the C2
spinolaminar line of >2 mm relative to a line drawn between the spinolaminar lines of C1 and C3
![Page 136: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/136.jpg)
Basion-dental interval (BDI) >12 mm ▪ Basion-axial line interval (BAI) >12 mm ▪ Unilateral facet dislocation ▪ Bilateral facet dislocation Widening of the uncovertebral joints Sum of C1 lateral mass offset in excess of 7
mm (adding the amount of lateral displacement of each C1 lateral mass)
▪ Odontoid fracture type I or II ▪ Occipital condyle fracture type III
![Page 137: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/137.jpg)
INITIAL TREATMENT
Immobilization rigid cervical orthosis- Philadelphia collar unstable injury this is inadequate often
and cervical traction required halo traction or gardner-wells tongs 1cm posterior to external auditory meatus
and just above the pinna should be MRI compatible 10-15 pounds usually appropriate post alignment xray and neuro exam
![Page 138: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/138.jpg)
CLOSED REDUCTION Injuries demonstrating angulation, rotation or
shortening restore normal alignment therefore decompressing
the spinal canal and enhancing neuro recovery preventing further injury
need neuro monitoring and radiography awake, alert and cooperative patient to provide
feedback traction, positioning and weights ( 10 pds head and 5
pds each level below) xray after new weight applied maintain after with 10-15 lbs traction
![Page 139: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/139.jpg)
STABILIZATION
Traction Skin Skeletal
Halo traction Crutchfield tongs
![Page 140: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/140.jpg)
STABILIZATION (1)
In incomplete lesion, early stabilization prevent repetitive injury of the spinal cord and improve neurological outcome. Delayed neurological deterioration--- 5%.
Improper immobilization. Early mobilization and rehabilitation.
Stabilization had benefit in all spinal injury patients.
![Page 141: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/141.jpg)
STABILIZATION (2)
Immediate correction with external orthotic device or operative fixation
External orthoses vs surgical intervention Surgical stabilization better than external
orthoses only Early stabilization better than late
stabilization in post-surgical neurological deterioration
![Page 142: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/142.jpg)
CERVICAL TRACTION
![Page 143: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/143.jpg)
CRUTCH FIELD TONGS
![Page 144: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/144.jpg)
HALO TRACTION
![Page 145: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/145.jpg)
PHARMACOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT
NASCIS I,II,III---randomized, prospective, double-blinded---Methylprednisolone sodium succinate (MPSS) Within 3 hours, MPSS 30mg/kg bolus +
5.4mg/kg/hr infusion for 24 hours. During 3~8 hours, MPSS 30mg/kg bolus +
5.4mg/kg/hr infusion for 48 hours. Effect of neurogenic improvement:
suppress inflammatory response and vasogenic edema.
![Page 146: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/146.jpg)
SURGICAL DECOMPRESSION (1)
Cervical spinal cord injury---- During complete injury, no neurological
improvement in early or later decompression.
During incomplete injury, controversial in surgical decompression.
Laminectomy may result in neurological deterioration.
Anterior cervical decompression may improve function in incomplete quadriplegics.
![Page 147: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/147.jpg)
SURGICAL DECOMPRESSION (2)
Experimental models-- rapid decompression better than later intervention.
Human model— early reduction within 8 hours brings significant recovery in one study; however, some others against it.
Increased risk such as pulmonary morbidity associates early surgery.
![Page 148: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/148.jpg)
SURGICAL DECOMPRESSION (3)
Anterior approach is favored; posterior laminectomy has no benefit and worse cord compression.
As a consensus, the only accepted indication for emergent surgical treatment is progressive neurological deterioration--- such as fracture displacement, epidural hematoma, spinal cord edema or infarction.
![Page 149: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/149.jpg)
TAKE HOME MESSAGE
IF HAVE HIGH ENOUGH INDEX OF SUSPICION TO GET XRAYS, THEN DO NOT ACCEPT INADEQUATE ONE
KNOW YOUR PEDIATRIC ANATOMICAL VARIATIONS DO NOT FORGET NONSKELETAL INJURIES: LIGAMENTOUS INSTABILITY, AND SCIW0RA If a spinal fracture is identified at any level, the
entire spine should be examined with anteroposterior and lateral views to document the presence or absence of spinal fractures at other levels
DON’T BE IN A HURRY TO CLEAR THE CERVICAL SPINE - ALWAYS LEAVE IN A HARD COLLAR
Progressive neurological deficit in cord compression needs early surgical decompression.
Anterior decompression is better. Early surgical intervention for instability prevents
deterioration
![Page 150: Cervical spine injuries initial evaluation](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103113/554afb26b4c905fc0e8b4c86/html5/thumbnails/150.jpg)