Cervical cancer 10 2011

43
Ahmed Zeeneldin

description

This is a comprehensive overview of Cervical cancer: Diagnosis, staging and treatment

Transcript of Cervical cancer 10 2011

Page 1: Cervical cancer 10 2011

Ahmed Zeeneldin

Page 2: Cervical cancer 10 2011

Anatomy

Ahmed Zeeneldin 2

Page 3: Cervical cancer 10 2011

Incidence ó Worldwide:ó Third incidence (~500, 000 anually)ó Second cause of cancer death (~ 275, 000)ó 75% of cases occur in developing countries

ó Why incidence is low in developed countries?ó Screening

Ahmed Zeeneldin 3

Page 4: Cervical cancer 10 2011

NCI-Egypt

Ahmed Zeeneldin 4

Page 5: Cervical cancer 10 2011

Risk factorsó HPV: most importantó High incidence areas: HPV 10-20%ó Low incidence areas: HPV 5-10%ó Immunization: ó Gardasil FDA approved in 2006ó Cervarix

ó Other:ó Smoking, parity, contraceptive use, ó Early coitus, many sexual partners, history of STDs ó chronic immunosuppression

Ahmed Zeeneldin 5

Page 6: Cervical cancer 10 2011

HPV and cervical cancer

Ahmed Zeeneldin 6

Page 7: Cervical cancer 10 2011

Vaccination Against HPVó Gardasil and Cervarix (C>G)ó Protein of HPV 6, 11, 16, 18 (G) 16, 18 (C)ó 3 IM injections over 6 Months (G 0,2,6), (C 0,1,6)ó Age

ó most effective if given before sexual intercourse is initiatedó Girls and women ages 9 -26 yearsó Not recommended for older than 26 years.ó Best for 11-12 years

ó Effectiveness after 3 years (no CIN):ó No prior HPV infection: 99%ó Prior HPV infection: 44%

ó Why to continue screening? ó Not all HPV strainsó Not 100% effective

ó Males: ó Penile cancer and anal cancer

Ahmed Zeeneldin 7

Page 8: Cervical cancer 10 2011

Screeningó Age:ó 3 years after onset of vaginal intercourseó No later than 21 yearsó Till 70 y

ó Methods:ó Cytology: ó conventional smears annually ó liquid based every 2 y

ó HPV DNA testing: for age >30 yó Every 3 y in combination with cytology if –veó If +ve at the discretion of the physician

ó HPV vaccination: screened as usual, why?

Ahmed Zeeneldin 8

Page 9: Cervical cancer 10 2011

Cytology neededó Uterine cervix is accessible to physicianó Histology is needed

1. Cervical cytology or 2. Papanicolaou (Pap) smears or3. Cervical biopsy4. Cone biopsy: if others are inadequate or if degree of

invasion needed.

Ahmed Zeeneldin 9

Page 10: Cervical cancer 10 2011

Cervical (pap) smear

Ahmed Zeeneldin 10

Page 11: Cervical cancer 10 2011

Cone biopsy

Ahmed Zeeneldin 11

Page 12: Cervical cancer 10 2011

CT

Ahmed Zeeneldin 12

Parametrial extension and uerter encasement Pelvic wall extension Bladder and rectum

invasion

Page 13: Cervical cancer 10 2011

Ahmed Zeeneldin 13

Page 14: Cervical cancer 10 2011

Ahmed Zeeneldin 14

Page 15: Cervical cancer 10 2011

Figure 2. Clinical and imaging stage IIIB cervical cancer in a 37-year-old woman with hydronephrosis at diagnosis

Pannu H K et al. Radiographics 2001;21:1155-1168

©2001 by Radiological Society of North America

Page 16: Cervical cancer 10 2011

Figure 4. Tumor extension into the vagina in a 50-year-old woman with clinical stage IIIB and imaging stage IIIA cervical cancer

Pannu H K et al. Radiographics 2001;21:1155-1168

©2001 by Radiological Society of North America

Page 17: Cervical cancer 10 2011

Histologyó Normal epithelial lining of cervix

ó Cancer: ó Squamous cell carcinoma (80%)ó Adenosquamousó Adenocarcinomaó Others :ó Neuroendocrine carcinoma, ó small cell tumors, ó glassy-cell carcinomas, ó sarcomas,

Ahmed Zeeneldin 17

Page 18: Cervical cancer 10 2011

Clinical pictureó Asymptomaticó Watery vaginal dischargeó Postcoital bleeding oró Intermittent spotting.

Ahmed Zeeneldin 18

Page 19: Cervical cancer 10 2011

Workup ó History and physical examinationó Routine lab: ó CBCD, liver and renal function tests.

ó Radiologic imaging : ó Chest x-ray, CT, MRI, or PET;

ó Cystoscopy and proctoscopy examination under anesthesia

Ahmed Zeeneldin 19

Page 20: Cervical cancer 10 2011

Staging of cervical CAT1=FI (T2=FII) (T3=FIII) (T4=FIVA) N1 M1=FIVB

Confined to uterus A: Microscopic

A1: 7H x 3D mmA2: 7H x 5D mm

B: MacroscopicB1: <= 4 cmB2: > 4 cm

Outside uterus but not T3 A: Parametrium negative

A1: <= 4 cmA2: > 4 cm

B: Parametrium positive

Outside uterus toA: Vagina lower 1/3 B: Pelvic wall, Causing HN of NFK

Outside uterus to:A: Bladder or rectal mucosaB: Extrapelvicextension

RegionalLN

Distant spreadIncludingperitoneal

Ahmed Zeeneldin 20

No stage groupingF =FIGO stageHN:hydronenphrosisNFK: non-functioning kidneyM1=FIVB

Page 21: Cervical cancer 10 2011

Treatment modalitiesó Surgery: ó Limited: radical trachelectomy for tumors up to 2 cm if

fertility preservation is desiredó Extensive: radical hystrectomy +/- pelvic +/- PA LND

ó Concomitant chemo-radiotherapy; CCRT: (Cisplatin)ó Palliative chemotherapy: cisplatin-basedó BSC

Ahmed Zeeneldin 21

Page 22: Cervical cancer 10 2011

Treatment of Cx CAStage stage Surg CCRT Chemo

Localized micro IA1 Micro 7Hx3D Yes* No No

micro IA2 Micro 7H x 5D Yes* ORà RT alone** No

<=4cm IB1IIA1

<=4cmParmet -/ <=4cm

Yes * ORà RT alone** No

>4cm IB2IIA2

>4cmParmet -/ >4cm

Yes ORà CCRT*** No

Locally advanced

IIBIIIA/BIVA

Paramet +LVag/Pel WBlad/Rect/HN

No CCRT No

Metastatic IVB Mets No No Pall’tve

Ahmed Zeeneldin 22

* Surgery can be extensive or limited for fertility preservation*Post op CCRT can be given in : LN+, SM+, Parametrium +** No surgery after CCRT *** adjuvant surg can be done after CCRT

Page 23: Cervical cancer 10 2011

Surgery and CCRTó If surgery was used first: ó Post op CCRT can be given to high risk patients:ó positive lymph nodes, oró parametrial extension, or ó positive margins)

ó If CCRT was used first: surgery is not recommended

Ahmed Zeeneldin 23

Page 24: Cervical cancer 10 2011

RT and surgery are equal in Treatment of stage IB and IIA

ó Landoni Eet al, Lancet. 1997 Aug 23;350(9077):535-40.

Ahmed Zeeneldin 24

RT Surgery

IB & IIA 171 172 *(PO RT to => pIIB ~ 100 pt)

5-y DFS 74% 74%

5-y OS 83% 83%

Recurrence 26% 25%

Severe morbidity* 19% 28%

Page 25: Cervical cancer 10 2011

Concurrent CRTó CCRTó Improves DFS and OS compared to RT alone or RT+HU

ó Cisplatin : standardó 40 mg/sm weekly up to 6 weeks (Max 70 mg)ó Less toxic than 5FU/Cisplatin

ó Cisplatin and 5FU: more toxicó 3 cycles: ó (1st and 2nd )D1-5, D22-26: during EBRT ó (3rd ) D1-5 during second brachytherapy course

ó Cisplatin 20 mg/sm/d x 5 d, FU 1000 mg/sm/d x 5dó 5FU alone is not optimaló Intolerance to ciaplatin: àcarboplatin or xelodaó Cb: 100mg/m or UC 2 weekly

ó Novel regimen: weekly x 6 CCRT à adjuvant gem cisó CCRT: Cisplatin 40 mg/sm followed by Gem 125 mg/m2ó Adj: Gem (1,000 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 8) plus Cis (50 mg/m2 on

Day 1) x 2 cycles q 21 d

Ahmed Zeeneldin 25

Page 26: Cervical cancer 10 2011

Adding Gemcitabine to cisplatin in CRTó Dueñas-González et al, 2011, JCOó Patients and Methods Eligible chemotherapy- and

radiotherapy-naive patients with stage IIB to IVA disease and Karnofsky performance score ≥ 70 were randomly assigned to:ó arm A (cisplatin 40 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 125 mg/m2

weekly for 6 weeks with concurrent external-beam radiotherapy [XRT] 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions, followed by brachytherapy [BCT] 30 to 35 Gy in 96 hours, and then two adjuvant 21-day cycles of cisplatin, 50 mg/m2 on day 1, plus gemcitabine, 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8) :ó or to arm B (cisplatin and concurrent XRT followed by BCT

only; dosing same as for arm A)

Ahmed Zeeneldin 26

Page 27: Cervical cancer 10 2011

ó Results Between May 2002 and March 2004, 515 patients were enrolled (arm A, n = 259; arm B, n = 256). ó PFS at 3 years was significantly improved in arm A versus

arm B (74.4% v 65.0%, respectively; P = .029), ó as were overall PFS (log-rank P = .0227; hazard ratio [HR],

0.68; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.95), ó overall survival (log-rank P = .0224; HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.49

to 0.95), ó and time to progressive disease (log-rank P = .0012; HR,

0.54; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.79). ó Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were more frequent in arm A than

in arm B (86.5% v 46.3%, respectively; P < .001), including two deaths possibly related to treatment toxicity in arm A.

Ahmed Zeeneldin 27

Page 28: Cervical cancer 10 2011

CCRT is better than RT alone inStage IB2-IVA

Ahmed Zeeneldin 28

Page 29: Cervical cancer 10 2011

CCRT is better than RT alone in Bulky stage IB2 and IIA (=> 5cm) & IIB-IVA

ó Moris et al N Engl J Med. 1999 Apr 15;340(15):1137-43.ó Conclusions: CCRT > RTó Cisplatin 20 mg/sm/d &FU 1000 mg/sm/d [x 5d x 3 courses]

Ahmed Zeeneldin 29

RT CCRT

193 193

5-y DFS 40% 67% (P<0.001)

5-y OS 58% 73% (P<0.004)

Recurrences and mets higher

Hem toxicity Higher but reversibel

Page 30: Cervical cancer 10 2011

CCRT is better than RT alone in Bulky stage IB and IIA (=> 4cm)

ó Keys HM et al, N Engl J Med. 1999 Apr 15;340(15):1154-61.ó Conclusions: CCRT > RTó Cisplatin 40 mg/sm q w x 6 max 70 mg

Ahmed Zeeneldin 30

RT+Surgery CRT+Surgery

186 183

RR of progression 1 0.51 (P<0.001)

RR of death 1 0.54 (P=0.008)

G3-4 Hem Toxicity 2% 21%

GI toxicity 5% 14%

Page 31: Cervical cancer 10 2011

CCRT with cisplatin is standard in Bulky stage IIB-IVA

ó Rose et al, N Engl J Med. 1999 Apr 15;340(15):1144-53.

ó Conclusions: CCRT > RT, Cis = cis/5FU > HUó Cis 40 mg/sm/w x 6ó Cisplatin 50mg/sm d1 &FU 1000 mg/sm/d [x 4d x 2 courses]

Ahmed Zeeneldin 31

RT+ cisplatin RT+ cis+5FU+HU RT+HU

SCC, adeno, AdenoSquamous

`175 `175 ~175

PFS Higher (P<0.001) higher (P<0.001) Lower

OS Higher (P=s) Higher (p=s) lower

RR of progression 0.57 0.55 1

RR of death 0.61 0.58 1

Page 32: Cervical cancer 10 2011

Chemotherapy for Rec/metsó First-line combination therapyó Cisplatin/paclitaxeló Carboplatin/paclitaxeló Cisplatin/topotecanó Cisplatin/gemcitabine (category 2B)

ó Possible first-line single agent therapyó Cisplatin (preferred as a single agent)ó Carboplatinó Paclitaxel

Ahmed Zeeneldin 32

Page 33: Cervical cancer 10 2011

Chemotherapy for Rec/metsó Second-line therapy††ó Bevacizumabó Docetaxeló 5-FU (5-fluorouracil)ó Gemcitabineó Ifosfamideó Irinotecanó Topotecanó Pemetrexed (category 3)ó Vinorelbine (category 3

Ahmed Zeeneldin 33

Page 34: Cervical cancer 10 2011

Treatment of metastatic diseaseó Systemic chemotherapy and ó Individualized radiotherapy.

Ahmed Zeeneldin 34

Page 35: Cervical cancer 10 2011

Relapseó Locoregionaló Systemic

Ahmed Zeeneldin 35

Page 36: Cervical cancer 10 2011

Relapseó Locoregional therapy ó After surgery: CCRTó After RT: possible surgeryó After surgery and CCRT: platinum-based CT/BSC

ó Systemic therapy ó Extrapelvic or para-aortic recurrence(s) at multiple sites

or with unresectable recurrenceó Platinum-based CT/BSC

ó Surgery has limited role for isolated sites

Ahmed Zeeneldin 36

Page 37: Cervical cancer 10 2011

Palliative chemotherapyó Recurrent or metastatic diseaseó Not candidate for surgery or RTó Platinum-based (most active, RR 20-30%)ó Compared with cisplatin:ó Combinations :ó Same QOL, little or no OS advantageó cisplatin/paclitaxel and ó cisplatin/topotecan (category 1 for both)

Ahmed Zeeneldin 37

Page 38: Cervical cancer 10 2011

Cisplatin-paclitaxel

ó Moore et al, J Clin Oncol 2004;22:3113-3119

Ahmed Zeeneldin 38

cispaltin Cisplatin - pacliatxel

IVB recurrent or persistent SCC

134 130

RR (CR) 19 (6)% 36 (15)%

Median PFS 2.8 m 4.8 m (P < .001)

Median OS 8.8 m 9.7 m (PNS)

QOL same same

Anemia/neutropenia more

Page 39: Cervical cancer 10 2011

Cisplatin- topotecan

ó Long HJ et al, J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jul 20;23(21):4626-33.ó Cis 50 mg/sm q 3wó Topo 0.75 mg/sm/d x 3 d q 3wó MVAC third arm was closed due to high mortalityó Fisrt to show OS advantage

Ahmed Zeeneldin 39

Cispaltin Cisplatin - topotecan

146 147

RR 13% 27%

Median PFS 2.9 m 4.6 m (P=0.014)

Median OS 6.5 m 9.4 m (P=0.017)

QOL same same

Anemia/neutropenia more

Page 40: Cervical cancer 10 2011

ó PATIENTS AND METHODS: ó RCT of 3 regimens every 3 weeks doses in mg/m2ó paclitaxel 135 over 24 hours plus Cis 50 day 2 (PC); ó vinorelbine 30 days 1 &8 plus Cis 50 day 1 (VC); ó gemcitabine 1,000 day 1 &8 plus Cis 50 day 1 (GC); ó topotecan 0.75 days 1, 2, &3 plus Cis 50 day 1 (TC).

Ahmed Zeeneldin 40

Page 41: Cervical cancer 10 2011

Ahmed Zeeneldin 41

Page 42: Cervical cancer 10 2011

Ahmed Zeeneldin 42

Page 43: Cervical cancer 10 2011

Ahmed Zeeneldin 43

Conclusions•VC, GC, and TC are not superior to PC in terms of overall survival (OS). •However, the trend in RR, PFS, and OS favors PC. •Differences in chemotherapy scheduling, pre-existing morbidity, and toxicity are important in individualizing therapy.