CERN/IT/DB Object / Object-Relational Database Management Systems Brief History & Outlook Jamie...
-
date post
19-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of CERN/IT/DB Object / Object-Relational Database Management Systems Brief History & Outlook Jamie...
CERN/IT/DB
Object / Object-Relational Database Management Systems
Brief History & OutlookJamie Shiers, IT-DB, CERN
CERN/IT/DB
Overview
Evolution of Object & Object-Relational DBMS
Status of Market today
Outlook
CERN/IT/DB
DefinitionsFrom Stonebraker: Object-Relational DBMSs: The Next Great Wave
Filesystems: no query RDBMS: query, simple data ODBMS: no (poor) query,
complex data ORDBMS: query & complex
• (Picture Akmal Chaudri)
CERN/IT/DB
RDBMS
E.F.Codd: “A Relational Model of Data for Large Shared Data Banks”, CACM 13, 6 (June 1970) pp 377 – 387 See http://wwwinfo.cern.ch/db/aboutdbs/papers/SRC-1997-018.pdf
Led to numerous commercial products: Oracle, SQL/DS, DB-2, SYBASE, Informix, MS SQLServer, etc.
In use at CERN since early 1980s…
Oracle Users Guide – V2.3
Relational S/W Inc.
CERN/IT/DB
ODBMS
Started ~late 1980s in research projects
Altaïr O2, Objectivity/DB, Ontos, … Target markets (Cattell): CAD,
CASE, CAP, Scientific/Medical, AI, etc.
Object-Oriented DB Manifesto: “An OO DBMS must satisfy 2 criteria:
1. It should be a DBMS2. It should be object-oriented”
CERN/IT/DB
ODBMS Speculation
CERN/IT/DB
ODBMS RealityMarket much smaller than
predictedRationalisation
but less than in RDBMS market• O2 presumably now belongs to IBM!
What happened?
CERN/IT/DB
Market
Numerous “dinosaur” analogies After all, IBM invented RDBMS technology and
only now(?) have a competitive RDBMS product
Can lightning strike twice / thrice?Predictions of ODBMS market: revised
down in 1998 timeframe Original predictions (apparently) included
ORDBMS component In other words, $1-2B includes Oracle’s share
CERN/IT/DB
Technology
ODBMS initially worked with Smalltalk, C++, CO2, … Mainstream?
Industry focus is now on Java, XML, …
The latter provided sufficient impetus for established vendors to enhance their products
See, for example, VLDB papers:
CERN/IT/DB
VLDB Papers1989: complex objects / object modeling1990: performance of OODBs
1999: XML; Extending SQL with user-defined data types O-O, What Have They Done to DB2?
2000: A Database Platform for BioinformaticsThe need for complex data models has now
moved mainstreamThe established vendors have seen it coming and
have reacted
CERN/IT/DB
Impact on ODBMS
Down-turn of ODBMS market blamed on RDBMS announcements e.g. Oracle 8.0, 8i, …
Oracle 9i claims complete object support according to SQL-99 standard
C++ binding provides ODMG-like interface for C++ programmers with both navigational & associative access
CERN/IT/DB
RDBMS + “object extensions” Can store ADTs “Methods” on server
Complex Data with Queries
$8B in 1996Likely to become
dominant DBMS technology
Complex DataPerformance,
scalabilityTight Language
Binding OQL - SQL3 query
subset
Growth similar to RDBMS in ’80s
~$1B market by 2001
ODBMS / RDBMS / ORDBMS
~$100M?
From 1999 RD45 Status report…
CERN/IT/DB Risk Analysis:Summary of Options
Evaluate C++ binding to e.g. ORACLE Add ESCROW clause to Objectivity contract Pursue possibility of source license Visit key Objectivity customers Produce new requirements list Estimate manpower to support Objy in house Estimate manpower for “clean-sheet”
solution Continue to monitor alternatives
The LCB agrees with the other suggested steps to mitigate risk, with the addition of trying to insure that user code in reconstruction and analysis programs is kept as standards compliant as possible.
CERN/IT/DB
Espresso Preliminary results from the Espresso proof-of-concept
prototype suggest that a home-grown ODBMS focussing on HEP needs could be built with a reasonable amount of manpower, perhaps some 15 person-years in total. However, it is far from clear where even such a modest amount of manpower could come from, particularly in a period when the overall CERN manpower is shrinking. A certain amount of manpower could possibly be found within the collaborations and at external institutes. However, a core team responsible for the main developments would most likely have a significant impact on the viability of such a project. In the immediate future, there is essentially no manpower available beyond that to complete the performance and scalability tests and write an architectural document. In the longer term, a home-grown ODBMS remains a possible fallback solution, although the time to develop a full product suggests that this will no longer be true much later than 2002.
CERN/IT/DB
Oracle C++ Binding
Numerous C++ wrappers to Oracle’s C interface exist
With Oracle 9i, a C++ binding, modelled on JDBC, comes with the product
Had this existed in 1995, history might well have been different…
CERN/IT/DB
Oracle 9i studiesFocus of this workshop…
Well, today & tomorrow…Discussed at last July’s “RD45”
workshop As Oracle 8.2 – the number changed
but the features did not…During the Hoffmann Review of
LHC Computing…Activity “kicked off” after IT Eloise
meeting…
CERN/IT/DB
CERN/IT/DB
Eloise Actions The possibility of a joint project between
Oracle and CERN should be explored to allow participation in the Oracle 9i test with the goals of evaluating this product as a potential fallback solution and providing timely feedback on physics-style requirements. Non-staff human resources should be identified such that there is no impact on current production services for Oracle and Objectivity.