CENTRAL COUNCIL OF INDIAN MEDICINE NEW DELHIccimindia.org/meeting_file/pdf/pdf/ec_31-05-2012.pdf ·...

1169ec

CENTRAL COUNCIL OF INDIAN MEDICINE NEW DELHI

MINUTES OF 169TH MEETING OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE HELD ON 31.05.2012 & 06.6.2012 AT NEW DELHI

PRESENT

1. Vaidya Raghunandan Sharma, President, CCIM Chairman 2. Dr. Ved Prakash Tyagi, Vice-President (Ayurveda) Member

3. Prof. Hakim Syed Khaleefathullah, Vice-President (Unani) Member

4. Dr. V Stanley Jones, Vice-President (Siddha) Member 5. Dr. Vanitha Muralikumar Member

6. Dr. Yuvraj Tyagi Member

7. Dr. Chandrakant Kolte Gangaram Member 8. Dr. Prasanna Rao Member

9. Dr. Mohd. Shafique Member

10.Dr. Shuhabuddin Member

11. Dr. B. Muthukumar Member Dr. PR Sharma Secretary, CCIM

Agenda Item No.1. Confirmation of minutes of the 168th meeting of Executive Committee held on 5-6.03.2012,

14-15.03.2012, 03.04.2012 and 27.04.2012.

It was noted that 3rd Adjourned meeting of 168th meeting of Executive Committee

was held on 27.04.2012. The minutes of the same were circulated to all the

members of Executive Committee vide letter No. 5-1/2011-EC (168th ) dated

22.05.2012 to suggest addition/deletion with the request that if any comments are received, the same will be placed before the Executive Committee at the time of

confirmation of the minutes.

Members raise the question that sufficient time has not been given to the

members for submission of comments, however, it was decided if any

objection received within stipulated period will be placed before the next meeting otherwise minutes will be treated as confirmed.

Agenda Item No. 2. Consideration of the Visitation Report of

Ayurved Colleges.

It was noted that as per decision of the 168th meeting of Executive Committee held

on 5-6.03.2012, 14-15.03.2012, 03.04.2012 and 27.04.2012 the following Ayurved colleges have been revisited by the visitors of the CCIM as per details mentioned

against them to verify the content of Part-I submitted by the college. After

assessment of Visitation Report the assessment was placed before the Screening

Committee. The Executive Committee considered the Visitation Reports, assessment and the recommendations of the Screening Committee and decided as

under:-

2169ec

S.No. Name of the college Name of the visitor Recommendation of the

Executive Committee

1. Chhatisgarh Ayurved

College, Rajnandgaon

1. Dr. Vanitha Muralikumar

2. Dr. Prasanna N. Rao 15-16.05.2012

Recommended for UG with

75 seats

2. Parul Institute of Ayurveda, Vadodara, Gujrat

1. Dr. Vanitha Muralikumar 2. Dr. Prasanna N. Rao 19-20.05.2012

Recommended for UG with 50 seats

3. Shri Gajanan Maharaj Sansthan Ayurved Mahavidyalaya, Pusad

1. Dr. Vanitha Muralikumar 2. Dr. Prasanna N. Rao 21-22.05.2012


4. Pt. Shivshaktilal Lal Sharma Ayurved College, Ratlam

1. Dr. Vanitha Muralikumar 2. Dr. Prasanna N. Rao

23.05.2012

Recommended for UG with 50 seats and PG in Ayurved Siddhant-06, Kayachikitsa-06, Panchakarma-06.

5. Shri Raghavendra

Ayurved College, chitradurga

1. Dr. Chandrakant Kolte

2. Dr. Yuvraj Kumar Tyagi 14-15.05.2012


50 seats

6. Veerpulkeshi Vidyavardhan Samasth's rural Ayurved College,

Badami

1. Dr. Chandrakant Kolte 2. Dr. Yuvraj Kumar Tyagi

18-19.05.2012


7. Padamshri Dr. Vitthal Rao Vikhe Patil Foundation Ayurved College, Shevgaon, Ahmednagar

1. Dr. Chandrakant Kolte 2. Dr. Yuvraj Kumar Tyagi

28-29.05.2012


8. CB Guttal Ayurved

Medical College, Dharwad, Karnataka

1. Dr. Chandrakant Kolte

2. Dr. Yuvraj Kumar Tyagi 17.05.2012


50 seats

9. Dr. BRKR Ayurved College, SR Nagar, Hyderabad

1. Dr. Vanitha Muralikumar 2. Dr. Mallu Prasad 3. Dr. Prasanna N. Rao 07.05.2012

Recommended for UG with 50 seats and PG in (02) Dravyaguna, (04) Prasuti tantra, (10) Kayachikitsha, (02) Shalya, (03) Shalakya

1. No for PG in Samhita & Panchakarma due to deficit of higher faculty.

2. PG seats in

Dravyaguna are reduced from 06 to 02 due to deficit of higher faculty.

3. PG seats in Shalya are reduced from 03 to 02 due to

deficit of higher faculty & lecture

3169ec

possessing 05 years teaching experience as per latest post graduate Ayurved

Regulation (No. 66)

10. Tilak Ayurved Mahavidyalaya, Pune

1. Dr. Prasanna N.Rao 2. Dr. Vanitha Muralikumar 3. Dr. Chandrakant Kolte

05.05.2012

Recommended for UG with 100 seats & PG in (05) Rachana Sharira, (03) Dravyaguna Vigyan, (05) Rasa Shastra, (04) Prasuti & Striroga,(06) Kayachikitsa, (04) Shalya Samanya, (01) Kriya Sharir (03) Sangyaharan, (04) Panchkarma Not recommended for PG in Samhita, Roganidan, Swasthavritta, Agadtantra,

Kaumarbhritya & Shalakya due to deficit of higher faculty.

Agenda Item No.3. Reassessment of the visitation report.

It was noted that Executive Committee while considering the visitation report

alongwith assessment sheet referred the visitation reports of following colleges to Screening Committee for reassessment.

The visitation report alongwith assessment sheets and recommendations of the Screening Committee were considered by Executive Committee and decided as

under:- S.No. Name of the college Recommendation of the Executive

Committee

1. Dhanwantary Ayurved Medical College, Siddhapur


2. Govt. Ayurved Mahavidyalaya, Vadodara


3. Shaskiya Swashasi Ashtanga Govt. Autonomous Ashtang Ayurvedic College, Indore


4. Seth JP Govt. Ayurved College, Bhavanagar


5. SBS Ayurved College, Mundargi Recommended for UG with 30 seats

6. Veenavadini Ayurved College &

Hospital, Bhopal


7. Smt. K.C. Ajmera Ayurved College, Dhule


8. Sri Satya Sai Murlidhar Ayurvedic College, Moga

EC while examining the Visitation Report, assessment and recommendations of Screening committee observed that month and department wise percentage of bed occupancy has been mentioned in respective columns instead of mentioning total number of bed days occupied,

4169ec

therefore, it is not possible to rely on the data provided by the college. EC decided that the college may be asked to brought the record of IPD for verification in the

office to ensure the bed occupancy. Moreover, it was also decided that if teacher is already included in the list of the college than matter may be considered for permission.

9. Shri Dhanwantri Ayurvedic Medical College & Research Centre, At NH-02, Vill. Semari, Tehsil Chhata, Distt. Mathura, UP


Agenda Item No. 4. Consideration of the Visitation Report of

Ayurved Colleges in response of the LOI issued by the Govt. of India for the year

2012-13.

It was noted that Govt. of India has issued the Letter of Intent as per details given

below in compliance of recommendations of the CCIM and asking the CCIM for

verification of the compliance to be submitted by the applicant college during the LOI period. Further it has been asked that the comments of the CCIM may be

furnished within reasonable period after receipt of the compliance by the applicant

college. In this regard it is submitted that following colleges have been visited as

per details given below to verify the compliance. (A) S.No. Name of the Colleges Decision of GOI Name of the

visitors Date of visitation

1. Vaidya Yagya Dutt Sharma Ayurved Mahavidyalaya, Khurja (UP)

For LOI 1. Kayachikitsa-05 2. Kaumarbhritya-05 3. Stree & Prasuti Rog-04 4. Sangyaharan-05 5. Chhaya evum Vikiran

Vigyan-05 6. Panchkarma-05 R.14011/29/2011-EP dated 25.01.2012

1. Dr. Rajni Sushma 2. Dr. Shiv Swaroop 3. Dr. Mahendra Singh Meena

21-22.05.2012

2. Guru Nanak Ayurvedic Medical College & Hospital, Ludhiana-141118 (Punjab)

For increase intake capacity 50 to 60 seats R.13011/06/2011-EP dated 25.01.2012

1. Dr. P.C. Chaudhari 2. Dr. Surendra Patel

18-19.05.2012

3. Desh Bhagat Ayurvedic College & Hospital, Fatehgarh Sahib, Punjab

For LOI 1. Kayachikitsa-05 Rasashastra-05 R.14011/14/2011-EP(IM-1) dated 23.01.2012

1. Dr. Karan Singh 2. Dr. Swapna Kumar Bhunia 3. Dr. Manoj Mishra

21-22.05.2012

4. Dr. D.Y. Patil Pratisthan For LOI 1. Dr. Chandrappa 23-24.05.2012

5169ec

Ayurved College, Pimpri, Pune (MS)

1. Dravyaguna-04 2. Rognidana evam Vikriti

Vigyan-04 3. Agad Tantra avum Vidhi

Vaidayaka-06 4. Kaumarbhritya(Balroga)-

04 5. Shalakya Tantra-05 R.14011/24/2011-EP dated 19.01.2012

2. Dr. Parchure 3. Dr. Sudarshan Bahera

5. SDM College of Ayurved, Udupi, Karnataka

For LOI 1. Kaumarbhritya-04 2. Swasthavritta-04 3. Manasroga-05 4. Siddhant-05 5. Agadtantra-05

and to increase the admission capacity in 5 existing PG course-

1. Dravyaguna – 5 to 6 2. Rasashastra- 3 to 5 3. Bhaishjya Kalpana-2 to

4 4. Roganidan – 3 to 5 5. Panchkarma- 5 to 6 R.14011/08/2011-EP(IM-1) & R.13011/05/2011-EP(IM-1) dated 23.01.2012

1. Dr. Mohan Alva 2. Dr. Seshadri 3. Dr. Ram Manohar

18-19.05.2012

6. SGVV Trust‟s Shri Jagadguru Gavisiddeshwara Ayurvedic Medical College and Hospital Koppal, Karnataka

For LOI 1. Prasuti Tantra-04 2. Kaumarbhritya-04 3. Kriya Sharir-04 4. Shalakya-04 R.14011/20/2011-EP dated 23.01.2012

1. Dr. Veeracholan 2. Dr.Rajasekar Ganiger 3. Dr. Gowdar Amaregouda

18-19.05.2012

7. Kalabyraveshwara Swamy Ayurvedic Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Bangalore (Karnataka)

For LOI 1. Shalya Tantra-05 2. Shalakya Tantra-05 3. Kayachikitsa-05 R.14011/11/2011-EP dated 13.01.2012

1. Dr. G.B. Patil 2. Dr. Ashok Sharma 3. Dr. Narendra Sharma

18-19.05.2012

8. Hon. Shri Annasaheb Dange Ayurved Medical College, Sangli (MS)

For LOI 1. Samhita Siddhant-06 2. Kayachikitsa-06 3. Rognidan evam Vikriti

Vigyan-06 4. Striroga & Prasuti

Tantra-06 5. Shalakya Tantra-06 R.14011/43/2011-EP dated 23.01.2012

1. Dr. Batuk Shankar 2. Dr. Vasudevan Namboodri 3. Dr. Vishwajeet Singh

24-25.05.2012

9. Uttaranchal Ayurvedic College, Dehradun(Uttarakhand)

For LOI 1. Swasthavritta-05 2. Agad Tantra-05

1. Dr. Mallu Prasad 2. Dr. M. L. Naidu 3. Dr. Sudhakar

18-19.05.2012

6169ec

3. Dravyaguna-05 4. Maulik Siddhant-05 R.14011/06/2011-EP dated 25.01.2012

Mohite

10. Shubhdeep Ayurved Medical College and Hospital, Indore (MP)

For LOI 1. Samhita/Siddhant-05 2. Kayachikitsa-05 3. Rasashastra/Bhaishjya

Kalpana-05 R.14011/48/2011-EP dated 27.01.2012

1. Dr. Prajapathi Tripathi 2. Dr. Mantosh Jha 3. Dr. Subhash Verma

18-19.05.2012

11. KVG Ayurveda Medical College, Sullia

Issued LOI vide letter No. R.14011/45/2011-EP dated 27.02.2012 1. Bhaisjya Kalpana-06 seats

1. Dr. Hari Ram Bhadoria 2. Dr. Udaya Kumar 3. Dr. Ram Mohan

21-22.05.2012

12. *Rishikul Govt. PG Ayurvedic College and Hospital, Haridwar, Uttarakhand

Issued LOI vide letter No. R.14011/02/2011-EP dated 27.02.2012 1. Dravyaguna-04 seats 2. Samhita Siddhant-03 seats 3. Kayachikitsa-04 seats 4. Kaumarbhritya(Balrog)- 02 seats 5. Striroga & Prasuti Tantra-04 seats 6. Rachana Sharir-04 seats 7. Shalakya Tantra(Netra Roga)- 04 seats

1. Dr. Rajni Sushma 2. Dr. Shiv Swaroop 3. Dr. Mahendra Singh Meena

*Visitation has been postpone as per directions of Govt. of India.

13. Bapuji Ayurvedic Medical College & Hospital. Shimoga(Karnataka)

Issued LOI vide letter No. R.13011/15/2011-EP(IM-1) dated 02.03.2012 To increase intake capacity in existing UG course from 40 to 50

1. Dr. G.B. Patil 2. Dr. Ashok Sharma 3. Dr. Narendra Kumar

21-22.05.2012

14. Late Kedari Redekar Ayurvedic Mahavidyalaya, Gadhinglaj, Kolhapur(MS)

Issued LOI vide letter No. R.14011/47/2011-EP(IM-1) & R.14011/34/2011-EP(IM-1) dated 30.03.2012

To start new PG course-

1. Dravyaguna-06 Seats 2. Kaumarbhritya-06

Seats 3. Prasuti & Striroga-06

Seats 4. Shalya (Kshar Karma

avum Anushastra Karma-04 Seats

5. Kayachikitsa-06 6. Shalakya Tantra-06 7. Samhita-04

1. Dr.Prasant Kumar Sarkar 2. Dr. Sudhansh Dutt Sharma

22-23.05.2012

15. Sangam Sevabhavi Trsut‟s Ayurved Mahavidyalaya, Sangamner (MS)

Issued LOI vide letter No. R.14011/38/2011-EP(IM-1) dated 30.03.2011

To Start new PG course in

1. Dr. Hari Ram Bhadoria 2. Dr. Udaya Kumar 3. Dr. Ram Mohan

18-19.05.2012

7169ec

1. Kayachikitsa-05 seats 2. Prasuti & Striroga-05

seats 3. Shalya Tantra -05 seats 4. Shalakya Tantra-05

seats

16. Hanuman Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Sawarde‟s Ayurvedic Medical College, Peth Vadegaon, Dist. Kolhapur, (MS)

Issued LOI vide letter No. R.14011/42/2011-EP(IM-1) dated 30.03.2012 To start new PG course in 1. Kriya Sharir-06 seats 2. Roganidan-06 3. Kayachikitsa-06

1. Dr. B. P. Pandey 2. Dr.Ashutosh Kulkarni 3. Dr. Ravi Kumar Kicharia

21-22.05.2012

17. Ashwin Rural Ayurved College, Manchi Hill, Sangamner (MS)

Issued LOI vide letter No. R.14011/12/2011-EP(IM-1) dated 29.03.2012 To start new PG course 1. Shalya-06 2. Kayachikitsa-06 3. Rasashastra &

Bhaishjya Kalpana-06

1. Dr. Deodatta Bhadlikar 2. Dr. MM Jumble 3. Dr. Basant Kumar Singh

21-22.05.2012

18. Rajiv Gandhi Education Society‟s Ayurvedic Medical College, Ron

Issued LOI vide letter No. R.14011/15/2011-EP(IM-1) dated 30.03.2012 To start new PG course in Kayachikitsa, Shalya Tantra and Dravyaguna with 6 seats in each.

1. Dr. K.G. Vishwanathan 2. Dr. Kamlesh Rajgor 3. Dr. Pramod Kumar Sawant

21-22.02.2012

It was noted that Screening Committee has also not examined the

assessment as no policy in the matter has been decided so far to take the

decision in the matter.

However, after detailed discussion EC decided that assessment may be

done on the basis of policy adopted at the time of LOI.

Agenda Item No. 5 Consideration of Visitation report of

Jammu Institute of Ayurveda &

Research, Jammu.

It was noted that Jammu Institute of Ayurveda & Research will be visited on 24-

25.05.2012 by the visitor of the CCIM namely Dr. Deodatta S. Bhadlikar, Dr. M.M.

Jumle and Dr. Basant Kumar Singh to asses the available facilities of teaching and practical training in response of the letter No. R.17011/36/2011-EP(IM-1) dated

09.04.2012 of the Govt. of India. The visitation report, Assessment sheet and

recommendations of Screening Committee will be placed before the EC at the time of consideration of the agenda item.

As Visitation Report was not received, therefore, matter was adjourned for next meeting. At the time of decision VP (Ayurveda) raised as President,

CCIM is only empowered to take the decision in urgent matter where

object of the CCIM is to be defeated and even the adoption of procedure of

8169ec

circulation is also not possible. President assured clarify the matter in

respect of urgency of matter in the next meeting.

Agenda Item No. 6 Consideration of the application of MAM

Ayurved College Hadapsar for starting

PG diploma course.

It was noted that Government of India vide letter No. R.18011/09/2011-EP(IM-1)

dated 31.01.2012 has forwarded the proposal of MAM Ayurved College, Hadapsar to start PG Diploma Course in two subjects.

After going through the proposal following observations have been made-

1. Application fee of ` 4.00 Lack has been remitted.

2. Consent of University for starting PGD has been submitted.

3. The Government of India has forwarded the proposal.

4. The college has been recently visited on 07-08.02.2012 for the year 2012-13

and recommendations reads as under has already been sent to the Government of India for granting permission for the session 2012-13.

UG-60 Seats and PG in Ayurved Siddhant-03, Rachana Sharir-06, Kriya

Sharir-06, Dravyaguna-03, Rasashastra-05, Roganidan-03, Agadtantra-03, Prasuti & Striroga-06, Kayachikitsa-06 and Shalya-06.

5. As per one condition for granting permission for PG Diploma course in the

proposed course, of PG Degree course in the subject should be there. In this regard college is already conducting PG degree course in these subjects.

6. For five seats ( as per clause 15 of PGD Regulations one extra faculty is

required) there is one additional lecturer is there.

7. Summarized details are as under-

S.No. Name of

the subject

Proposed

seat for PG

Diploma

Recommended

seats for PG degree course

for the year

2012-13

Required

Faculty Existing Extra

Faculty P R L

1. Rasa Shastra &

Bhaishajya

Kalpana

5 5 3+2 1 2 3 1 Lecturer

2. Prasuti & Stri Roga

5 6 3+2 1 2 3 1 Lecturer

Executive Committee taking into consideration the recommendation of Screening Committee agreed to recommended to Govt. of India for

granting permission for admitting students in PG Diploma course for the

year 2012-13 as under.

1. Rasa Shastra & Bhaishajya Kalpana – 5.

2. Prasuti & Stri Roga – 5.

9169ec

Agenda Item No. 7 Consideration of the application of Bharti Vidya Peeth, Pune for starting PG

Diploma course.

It was noted that Government of India vide letter No. R.18011/10/2011-EP(IM-1) dated 31.01.2012 has forwarded the proposal of Bharti Vidya Peeth, Pune to start

PG Diploma Course in six subject.

After going through the proposal following observations was made-

1. Application fee of ` 12.00 Lakh has been remitted.

2. As College of Ayurved is a constituent college of Bharti Vidyapeeth (Deemed

University) Pune, therefore, consent of University for starting PGD has been submitted.

3. The Government of India has forwarded the proposal.

4. The college has been recently visited on 10-11.02.2012 for the year 2012-13

and recommendation reads as under has already been sent to the Government of India for granting permission for the session 2012-13.

UG-100 Seats and PG in (i) Rachana Sharir-04 (ii) Kriya Sharir-04 (iii)

Dravyaguna-04 (iv) Bhaishjya Kalpana-04 (v) Roga Nidan-03 (vi) Swasthavritta-05 (vii) Agad Tantra-04 (viii) Prasuti & Striroga-05 (ix)

Kayachikitsa-05 (x) Shalya-01 (xi) Panchkarma-03 and (xii) Shalakya-04

seats. 5. As per one condition for granting permission PG Diploma course in the

proposed course of PG Degree should be there. In this regard college is

already conducting PG degree course in these subjects.

6. For two seats (as per clause 15 of PGD Regulation no additional faculty is required).

7. Summarized details are as under-

S.No. Name of the subject PGD PG Required Existing P R L

1. Panchakarma 2 3 3+2 1 2 2

2. Sangyaharan (Shalya) 2 1 3+3 1 1 4

3. Cosmetology & Skin (Kaya) 2 5 4+4 3 3 2

4. Prasuti & Stri Rogo 2 5 3+3 2 1 3

5. Balroga 2 x 3+2 1 1 3

6. Netra roga (Shalakya) 2 4 3+3 2 3 1

After going through above summary, college does not fulfill the criteria in Balaroga

and Sangyaharan, therefore, it may not be recommended.

Executive Committee taking into consideration the recommendation of

Screening Committee agreed to recommended to Govt. of India for

granting permission for admitting students in PG Diploma course for the year 2012-13 as under:-

1. Panchakarma 2

10169ec

2. Sangyaharan (Shalya) 2

3. Cosmetology & Skin (Kaya) 2

4. Prasuti & Stri Rogo 2

5. Balroga 2

6. Netra roga (Shalakya) 2

Agenda Item No. 8. Clarification pertaining to recommendations of the PNNM Ayurveda Medical College,

Shoranur, Kerala with 50 seats in (UG) BAMS

course under Section 13C of IMCC Act, 1970 for the year 2012-13.

It was noted that PNNM Ayurveda Medical College, Shoranur, Kerala was visited on 27-28.01.2012 by the visitors to verify the facilities of teaching and practical

training for conducting Ayurvedacharya Course for the year 2012-13.

After assessing the visitation report the assessment was placed before the Screening Committee, thereafter, Executive Committee with the recommendations

of the Screening Committee. considering the non functionality of hospital college

was not recommend to Govt. of India for granting permission for the session 2012-13.

Further, Govt. of India asked the clarification in respect of non functionality of

Hospital. In response of the same following point were informed to the Govt. of

India.

1. OPD data- Nursing staff duty roster & Doctors duty roster are not in proper

format.(Part II Pg. No.8).

2. IPD data- IP medicine indent register was not provided to visitors, nursing

staff and Doctor‟s duty roster not in proper format. (part II pg. no.9)

3. IPD: case sheets are filled in local language. Follow up of patients is not

maintained properly. Investigation report not attached with case sheets.

Charity patients have less facilities. IP Medicine indent register & diet register

not in proper way. Total figure of day & month wise patients were not shown

in register. Most of IPD cases found admitted between a week only. (Part

II.pg.12)

4. OT- Non functional, (No operation performed, no record of

investigation/operations/discharge ,etc.(part II pg.no.25)

5. Panchkarma-records are not available. (Part II pg.no.10)

6. Labour Room- Non-functional, facilities for neonatal care not available.(part I

pg.no.25). Labour and birth registration is not available no deliveries are

conducted. (part II pg.no.10)

7. Paramedical staff: No separate Superintendent of hospital. However, there is

one faculty member who is neither Principal nor Dean. No part time

consultants have given there consents, No clinical registrars. Inadequate

nursing staff. In photographs of hospital staff some teachers are also present

some less qualified persons are also appointed. (part II pg.no.12)

11169ec

8. Hospital Staff- attendance through biometric is not recorded. (Part II

pg.no.6)

Furthermore, Govt. of India has stated that it is pertinent to mention here that if OPD/IPD data is not in format, it does not qualify non functionality of hospital. If

case sheets are in local language, it also does not meet the requirements of non

functionality of hospital and any fault in part of college. Even Article 345 of Eighth

Schedule to the Constitution of India mentioned about the official language of languages of a State and directs that the each Indian State has the power to

choose one or more regional languages or Hindi to be used for official purpose.

In respect to non functional OT and labour room, it has been noticed that in case of

Vaidyaratnam P.S. Varier Ayurved College, Kottakkal, Kerala and KMCT Ayurvedic Medical College at Kozhikode, Kerala, inspite of non functional OT and labour room

the hospital has not been concluded as non functional by CCIM in their

recommendation.

On perusal of part II of the visitors performa, it has been observed by the visitors

that the i. The IPD registers are properly printed and maintained, found correlating &

are satisfactory (part II pg. no. 9).

ii. OPD found functioning in proper way (part II pg. no. 12). iii. OPD data randomly verified and found correct data (part II pg. no.12)

iv. IPD patients randomly verified and found correct (part II pg. no. 12)

v. Hospital is running but more concentration given on paid patients (part II pg. no. 12).

In this background it has been requested by Govt. of India to clarify the position by

07.05.2012 urgently, that how come the recommendations of the CCIM and visitors

observations is contradictory; how the deficiencies indicated by the CCIM are linked

with the decided criteria by the Govt. and how it has been concluded that the hospital is non functional in selected cases, and how come discriminating approach

is being adopted by the CCIM.

It was also noted that similar objection have been received from the Govt. of India

vide letter No.R.17011/163/2012 EP dated 01.05.2012 in respect of Rama Rao

Patil Ayurved College, Purna, Parbhani and vide letter No. R.17011/116/2012 EP

dated 16.04.2012 in respect of Shri Gangadhar Shastri Gune Ayurved College Ahmednagar.

Executive Committee referred the matter to the Screening Committee.

Agenda Item No. 9. Approval of Annual Accounts for the year

2011-12 under Non-Plan and Plan-regarding.

It was noted that Annual Account for the year 2011-12 (Non Plan and Plan) are to

be submitted to DGACE by 30th June to conduct the audit of the same in due course of time. As per provisions of the General Regulations of Sub Clause 1 of clause 86.

The same should be submitted to DGACE after the approval the Executive

Committee.

12169ec

As accounts could not be prepared, therefore the agenda was adjourned

for next meeting.

Agenda Item No.10. Re-consideration of visitation report of

National Institute of Siddha, Chennai–reg.

It was noted that the visitation report and assessment report of National Institute

of Siddha have been reported at the meeting of Executive committee held on 14-

15.3.2012. The Executive Committee decided not to recommend the National Institute of Siddha to GOI for granting permission for admission for the year 2012-

13 on the following grounds:-

1. There are only 25 eligible teachers available against the requirement of 44. [The teachers mentioned at S.No.29 to S.No 34 are shown as regular

teachers but these teachers have not been included in the ANNEXURE III

(Details of Teaching staff) i.e. the details of only 28 teachers shown (out of

which 3 teachers are ineligible due to their contractual appointment).] Whereas contractual teachers have been considered eligible as per decision

of the EC in the II adjourned meeting held on 14-15.3.2012.

2. Hospital Pharmacy is not Functional. 3. The following departments which are essential for the PG education are

vacant viz.

1.Siddha Maruthuva Adippadai Thanthuvangalum Varalarum (Basic

Principles) 2.Udal Thathuvam (Physiology)

4. There is no OPD or IPD available for Deptt. of Aruvai Maruthuvam which is

essential for a Siddha Hospital as per the existing and Draft Minimum Standards for Siddha colleges and attached hospitals.

5. No delivery had been taken place during the reporting period.

6. No operation had been taken place during the reporting period. 7. No Librarian Available.

8. Radiologist is not available.

9. Students during their interaction told that Classes are not being taken

properly but only attendance is being taken. 10.Herbal garden is not available; it came to the notice of the visitors that a

small green house was opened on the first day of visitation.

11.Anaesthetist is not available. 12.USG is not available.

13.Identity cards are not available with all the staff of the institute.

14.Pharmacists less in number for the OPD Strength. 15.Visitors reported that the Head of the Dept. of Pothu Maruthuvam was not

available in the Department at the time of visitation.

However, during review of the same, it has been came to the notice of the office that the contractual teachers (total 3 in number) may be treated as eligible for this

year only as per the policy decision of Executive Committee. Therefore, the total

number of eligible teachers came to 28 instead of 25.

In this connection, the National Institute of Siddha since having no UG, requires a

professor, a reader and a lecturer per each department in PG as per the PG

Regulations of Ayurveda 2005 as adopted by Govt. of India for the years 2011-12

13169ec

and 2012-13 for granting permission communicated vide letter No.

R.11011/5/2011-EP dated 18.3.2011. So the total requirement of eligible teachers for National Institute of Siddha which is having 6 PG departments comes to 6

Professors, 6 Readers and 6 Lecturers i.e. 18 teachers for 5 seats in each subject.

The sanctioned intake capacity and the total number of eligible teachers present in

National Institute of Siddha are given below.

S.No. PG Department Sanctioned

Intake Capacity

Eligible teachers present

Permissible intake

capacity as per the

availability of teachers

Fulfillment of the

requirement of teachers against the

intake capacity

P R L

1. Gunapadam (Materia Medica)

8 1 2 1 3+4+1=8 Yes

2. Noi Nadal (Pathology) including Nunnuyiriyal (Microbiology)

7 1 1 2 3+2+2=7 Yes

3. Sattam Sarntha Maruthuvamum Nanju Noolum (Forensic Medicine and Toxicology)

7 1 4 3+4=7 Yes

4. Maruthuvam Pothu (General Medicine)

8 3 2 9+2=11 Yes

5. Sirappu Maruthuvam including Yoga & Varmam (Special Medicine)

8 1 1 3 3+2+3=8 Yes

6. Sool, Magalir and Kuzhanthai

Maruthuvam (Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Paediatrics)

8 1 1 3 3+2+3=8 Yes

However, the National Institute of Siddha still may not be recommended on the

grounds of other shortcomings pointed out above.

Executive Committee reiterate the earlier decision.

Agenda Item No.11. Pandemonium during the meeting of the

Sub-Committee (Unani) held on

09-10.05.2012.

14169ec

It was noted that during the meeting of Sub Committee of Unani held on 9-10th

May, 2012 while finalizing the Syllabus of Munafe-ul-Aza, at the end of meeting on 10.5.2012 an altercation between Dr. Shubabuddin and Dr. Rashidullah Khan took

place. Chairperson (Dr. Aliya Aman) pacified both of them. However, Dr.

Shuhabuddin submitted a representation in the evening and Dr. Rashidullah Khan

also sent his reorientation dated 11.5.2012 through e-mail.

However, comparative statement of both the members are as under:-

Dr. Shuhabuddin Dr. Rashidullah Khan

That I was present at the office of the

CCIM, Janakpuri to attend the meeting

of PG Syllabus Committee for the Munafil-Ul-Aza (Physiology) subject held

on 09.5.2012 and 10.5.2012. on second

day of the meeting (10.5.2012) after lunch, at about 3.00 PM during the

conclusion session I was giving thanks to

the President, CCIM for conducting the

meeting on the interest of Unani System of medicine in my speech. In this

meantime Dr. Rasheedulla suddently

interrupted and came towards me and stated a follows „you are President,

CCIM‟s man and what you are speaking

is baseless and the President, CCIM does not deserve for thanks. You have no

right to speak in favour of President,

CCIM.” During the argument he

repeatedly tried to assault me in front of all the CCIM members, experts and

officials of the CCIM including Secretary,

CCIM. All those members present in the meeting and Secretary, CCIM are

witnesses for Dr. Rasheedulla Khan‟s

misbehavior, misconduct and attempt to assault. Meanwhile Dr. Rasheedulla

Khan was threatening me that he is

going to assault me outside the

premises of the CCIM. He spoke me harsh words against the Present, CCIM

and he warned me as follows „you are

going to face serious consequences if you speak in favour of President, CCIM

Vaidya Raghunandan Sharma.”

This type of act of his misconduct and

misbehavior are repeated in the past

against the other members of CCIM too.

I hereby request your good self to take

Regarding the meeting of syllabus of

Physiology which was held on 9-10th

May, 2012 where Dr. Shahabuddin addressed to the members of CCIM and

informed that President, CCIM has

decided to allot a laptop to each member of CCIM and appreciated the President,

CCIM a lot of ways although the meeting

was on finalizing the syllabus of

Physiology. Since the election of President, CCIM is due in the month of

June it seems that his speech was for

campaigning of the President election so I objected because the platform was not

for election campaign. The whole matter

had been resolved on the interference of Chairperson (Dr. Aliya Aman) and the

Asstt. Registrar (Unani) thanks to all the

members of the Unani.

Now I have come to know that Dr.

Shuabuddin has filed a complaint against

me after discussing with the President of CCIM telephonically which may be

checked from the call details of the

phones of the President & Dr. Shababuddin to target me because I

have filed a complaint to the Hon‟ble

Minister and the Secretary, AYUSH,

Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India on 27th April, 2012

regarding the discrepancies were done

by the President, CCIM. It is also noted that this type of mis-happening never

happened in last six year tenure of my

membership when Dr. Shahabuddin, came in the CCIM as a member, he is

regularly disturbing the meetings which

were held on different occasions and he

also used un-parliamentary language in

15169ec

suitable measures against Dr.

Rasheedulla Khan for the security of the members of CCIM who are attending the

office of the CCIM from various parts of

India. if some assault attempts/or any

kind of damages to me or my belongings happens to me outside the premises of

CCIM in future, I hereby solely declare

that, he would be the responsible for that.

Though I thought to take this matter to

the local police authorities, to keep the

dignity and reputation of the CCIM and its members I did not do so and bringing

this matter for your kind notice and

action. I request your good self once again to

take stern disciplinary action against Dr.

Rasheedulla Khan, Member, CCIM (Unani and Research Officer, CCRUM.

the meeting held at Bangluru, which is

not in favour of Unani System of Medicine as he is on a responsible post

of CCIM.

In this connection, I request you Sir my view may also be taken before

consideration of aforesaid complaint. I

will lodge another complaint regarding other discrepancies done by the

President during his tenure to higher

authorities of the Government in future.

The President of CCIM will be responsible if, anything unwanted

happened with me in future.

Executive Committee condemned the incident and was of the opinion that

such type of incident should not be repeated in future.

Agenda Item No. 12. Election of President, CCIM and Vice-

President (Unani)- regarding.

It was noted that Government of India, in response of to fix the date of election

reported in the previous meeting, vide letter No. A.11019/2/2010-RD(CCIM

Elections) dated 02.05.2012 has informed that

“As reported by you, the term of President and Vice-President (Unani) will expire on 5.6.2012 whereas 18 nominated members will be demitting office on 27.6.2012. as

per the provisions of IMCC Act, 1970, the term of the President/Vice-President and

the members to be nominated will be for a period of five years. The newly nominated members can be able to take oath earliest only on 28.6.2012.

therefore, in this background an exceptional circumstance appears to have arisen

that the newly nominated members may not be in a position to participate in the

election process and they will deprived of their right to elect the new President and Vice-President (Unani), in case the election for the post of President/Vice-President

(Unani) is held on 5.6.2012, which may not be in line with democratic spirit.

Therefore, it is advised that you may consider the possibility of holding the

elections to the post of President/Vice-President (Unani) on 29.6.2012 or thereafter but in any case not later than 5.9.2012 by such time the newly nominated

members are expected to be in position. This will not violate the aforesaid

directions of the Apex Court, as a period of three months has been allowed in the

eventuality of exceptional circumstances.”

16169ec

It was noted further note hat Govt. of India has been asked again to send the list of

nominated members under Section 3(1)(c) to hold the election at the earliest in compliance of the order of Supreme Court of India.

Executive Committee noted the same .

Agenda Item No. 13 Inclusion of the names of college’s alongwith the names of University in Second Schedule

of IMCC Act, 1970.

It was noted that Govt. of India is maintaining the information in respect of

recognized medical qualification alongwith their awarding bodies in the form of 2nd

Schedule of IMCC Act, 1970. Govt. of India has intended to include the name of college alongwith the awarding University in to the Schedule of IMCC Act, 1970

year to year basis and sent the proposal to the Council while considering the matter

of inclusion of Ayurvedacharya (BAMS) qualification of West Bengal University of

Health Sciences, Kolkata. Though Central Council informed Govt. of India about the difficultly to be faced by the Universities in the matter but Govt. of India has issued

notification in respect of Ayurvedacharya (BAMS) qualification of West Bengal

University of Health Sciences, Kolkata by including the name of colleges also as well as in some other cases. Moreover, Govt. of India has proposed a time Schedule for

early notification of students who will be passing out in 2012. As per time Schedule

framed by Govt. of India, if the University send the desired information to CCIM by October, 2011 and subsequently the CCIM send the proposal to Deptt. of Ayush by

December 2011, then Deptt. shall be in a position to issue the notification along

with the name of colleges by February, 2012.

Accordingly letter were sent to the Universities and simultaneously Govt. of India

was informed about the difficulties to be faced by Universities in sending request

every year to Govt. of India for fresh notification alongwith the name of College and in case of absence of timely notification, the consequences to be faced by

concerned. It was also suggested that the degree awarded by University should be

included in IInd Schedule of IMCC Act, 1970 one time only as per practice adopted in past since establishment of CCIM. Moreover, to prohibit the practice of students

admission by not permitted college, the Govt. of India should notify the list of the

permitted college of Ayurved, Unani & Siddha for particular year before the

commencement of the session. Therefore, admission agency may include the name of permitted colleges for admission in their prospectus for counseling etc. and the

student may take admission in only permitted colleges.

Further, Govt. of India has issued Notification alongwith the name of the colleges in

respect of those students who had passed out from respective colleges upto Dec.,

2011 whereas Central Council has amended it from “those students who had

passed out” to “those student who have been admitted in the respective colleges during this period with the permission of Govt. of India”. Accordingly, Council has

sent few drafts Notification to Govt. of India. However, nothing has been heard

from the Govt. of India regarding draft amendment.

Now Govt. of India vide its letter No. V12013/02/2011-EP (IM-2) dated 18th April

2012 has proposed the following options available to the CCIM in such case-

17169ec

1. Registrar, CCIM/State Registrars to not to include/register the names of

students passed from non-permitted colleges; 2. Direct the Universities not to conduct exam for the students of non-

permitted colleges; and

3. Open a permanent Link (web-link) giving the details of permitted and non-

permitted colleges for each year

Government has asked the comments and proposal of the CCIM on the above issues for further proceeding in the matter.

Executive Committee agreed to the decision mentioned Sl.No. 2 i.e. Direct the Universities not to conduct exam for the students of non-permitted

colleges.

It was also decided to write the letter to Govt. of India that while issuing

the letter of permission/not permission to the colleges for admitting/not admitting the students for particular year, a copy of the same also endorse

to the Secretary, Director, Concerned University and Boards of the State

for not allowing admissions/appearing in examination/not registering the

students admitted (as the case may be) without the permission of Govt. of India.

Agenda Item No.14. Consideration of visitation report of Deoband

Unani Medical College for increase intake

capacity from 40 to 50 and starting PG course

in four subjects with 2 seats in each subject under section 13A of the IMCC Act, 1970-reg.

It was noted that Govt. of India has issued the Letter of Intent vide letters No.

13012/02/2011-EP (IM-I) dated 25.01.2012 and 14012/02/2011-EP (IM-I) dated 02.04.2012 to increase intake capacity from 40 to 50 and starting PG course in Moalajat, Munafeul Aza, Ilmul Jarahat and Niswan wa Qabalat with 2 seat in each subject. In response of recommendations of the CCIM and asking the CCIM for verification of the compliance to be submitted by the applicant college during the LOI period. Further, it has been asked that the comments of the CCIM may be furnished

within reasonable period after receipt of the compliance by the applicant college. In this regard, it was noted that college has been visited on 23-24.05.2012 by Dr. Tabrez Lari and Dr. Syed Shafique Ahmed to verify the compliance. The visitation report will be placed before the Screening Committee in its meeting held on 31.05.2012 at 10:00 AM and thereafter, the visitation reports, assessment sheet and recommendations of the Screening Committee will be placed before the Executive Committee at the time of

consideration of Agenda item. Executive Committee did not agree to recommend to Govt. of India for issuing LOP as college is not fulfilling criteria of Bed Occupancy i.e. 50 for PG Institute. Moreover, it was also noted that visitation report has not been filled up by the visitors properly and as per proforma as was asked, therefore, Executive

Committee decided to revisit the college for increasing intake capacity from 40-50 also decided that the TA claim of the visitors be forfeited.

Agenda Item No.15. Consideration of visitation report of

Anjuman-e-Islam Dr. MIJ Tibbia Unani

Medical College, Mumbai.

18169ec

It was noted that as per decision in 2nd Adjourned meeting of 168th Executive Committee held on 03.04.2012, the Anjuman-e-Islam Dr. MIJ Tibbia Unani Medical

College, Mumbai was re-visited by Dr. Shuhabuddin (EC member), Dr. Yousuf Khalil

and Dr Syed Shafique Ahmad (members) on 23-24.04.2012. However, the visitation

reports, assessment sheet and recommendations of the Screening Committee will be placed before the Executive Committee at the time of consideration of Agenda

item.

After considering the recommendation of Screening Committee agreed to

send the recommendation to Govt. of India for granting the permission for

UG with intake capacity 50 seats for the year 2012-13.


Govt. Ayurved College, Bangalore.

It was noted that hat Executive Committee in its meeting held on 27.04.2012 while confirming the minutes of the adjourned meeting of 168th Executive Committee

held on 14-15.03.2012 objected the adoption of two different criteria in respect of

non allied and have M.O./lecturer appointed beyond 40 years for granting/not

granting permission in respect of Government and Private colleges. As non-allied subject have been treated ineligible in private colleges paradoxically have been

treated eligible in Government colleges. Similarly consideration of the age of 40

years for M.O. as well as appointment of lecturer beyond 40 years.

In view of the above, 3 teachers are in non-allied subject in Govt. Ayurved College, Bangalore may not consider as eligible and cases of M.O. and Lecturer may also be

examined in respect age of 40 years at the time of appointment.

It was noted that the matter was referred to Screening Committee for

reconsideration in view of the discussion of Executive Committee held on

27.04.2012. Executive Committee noted that the recommendation of the

Screening Committee stating that the recommendation in respect of this college also be forwarded to Govt. of India on the analogy as earlier sent

to Govt. of India in respect of similar other colleges.


Govt. Taranath Ayurved College, Ballary.

It was noted that Executive Committee in its meeting held on 27.04.2012 while confirming the minutes of the adjourned meeting of 168th Executive Committee held on 14-15.03.2012 objected that two different criteria in respect of non allied teachers and considering M.O./lecturer beyond 40 years for granting/not

granting permission in respect of Government and Private college have been adopted. As teachers of non-allied subjects have not been treated eligible in private colleges paradoxically have been treated eligible in Government colleges. Similarly consideration of the age of 40 years for M.O. as well as appointment of lecturer beyond 40 years.

19169ec

In view of the above, 5 teachers are in non-allied subject in Govt. Taranath Ayurved College, Ballary may not consider as eligible and cases of M.O. and Lecturer may also be examined in respect of the age of 40 years at the time of

appointment.

It was also noted that the matter was referred to Screening Committee for reconsideration in view of the discussion of Executive Committee held on

27.04.2012. Executive Committee noted the recommendation of the

Screening Committee stating that the recommendation in respect of this college also be forwarded to Govt. of India on the analogy as earlier sent

to Govt. of India in respect of similar other colleges.

Agenda Item No.18. Lalit Hari State PG Ayurved College &

Hospital, Pilibhit, UP

It was noted that letter No. 101 dated 24.04.2012 received from Lalit Hari State PG Ayurved College & Hospital, Pilibhit, UP stating that the list of teachers produced

before to the visiting committee who were visited this college on dated 22.02.2012

has got one typing mistake, i.e. on S No. – 26, Dr. AJIT SINGH SACHAN is working as lecturer in Agad Tantra department of this college. While it was typed in

Rasashastra.

It has been requested to accept the correction.

In this regard, it was noted that recommendation for not granting permission for

the session 2012-13 was already sent to Govt. of India vide letter No. 3-4/2012-

Ay.(5) dated 10.04.2012.

The above said letter alongwith the enclosure was forwarded to Govt. of India for

taking into consideration as per direction of the President, CCIM.

However, after reviewing the corrected list of teaching staff provided by college, it

has been noticed that the higher faculty is increased from 9 to 12, alongwith one eligible lecturer in Agad Tantra Deptt.

After considering the recommendation of Screening Committee to send the

revised recommendation to Govt. of India accordingly, the Executive Committee agreed to the same.

Agenda Item No. 19. Consideration of Bhanwar Lal Nahata Samriti Sansthan's Mandsaur Institute

of Ayurved Education & Research,

Mhow-Neemuch Road, Mandsaur, MP.

It was noted that Bhanwar Lal Nahata Samriti Sansthan's Mandsaur Institute of

Ayurved Education & Research, Mhow-Neemuch Road, Mandsaur, Madhya Pradesh was visited on 13-14.02.2012 to assess the available facilities of teaching and

practical training for granting permission for the session 2012-13.

The Visitation Report, assessment sheet and recommendation of Screening Committee were considered by Executive Committee in its meeting held on

20169ec

27.04.2012. EC did not agree to grant the permission but after going through the

assessment it has been observed that there is no reason for not granting permission for the session 2012-13.

After considering the recommendations of Screening Committee as there is no specific shortfall and reason for not granting permission, therefore, be

recommended to the Govt. of India for granting permission for the session

2012-13, the Executive Committee agreed to the same.

Agenda Item No. 20 (taken with the permission

of the chair.)

Representation of Govt. Ayurved

college, Nagercoil.

It was noted by the Executive Committee that it was brought to the notice of the Screening Committee that one teacher of Govt. Ayurved College, Nagercoil has been omitted for consideration at the time of the assessment made in the

previous. The Screening Committee went through all the facts and agreed to reconsider the omitted teacher and agreed to send the revised recommendation to the Govt. of India after accepting the same as higher faculty. As agenda could not be completed, therefore, meeting was adjourned

for 06th June, 2012. The Adjourned meeting was held on 06.06.2012

PRESENT

1. Vaidya Raghunandan Sharma, President, CCIM Chairman 2. Dr. Ved Prakash Tyagi, Vice-President (Ayurveda) Member

3. Prof. Hakim Syed Khaleefathullah, Vice-President (Unani) Member

4. Dr. Vanitha Muralikumar Member 5. Dr. Yuvraj Tyagi Member

6. Dr. Chandrakant Kolte Gangaram Member

7. Dr. Prasanna Rao Member 8. Dr. Mohd. Shafique Member

9. Dr. Shuhabuddin Member

10. Dr. B. Muthukumar Member

Dr. PR Sharma Secretary, CCIM

Following could not attend the meeting-

1. Dr. V Stanley Jones, Vice-President (Siddha) Member

Special Agenda- Special discussion on National Commission for Human Resources for Health Bill, 2011.

It was noted that a letter No. R.S.11/1/2011-Com.(H&FW) dated 28.05.2012 has

been received from the Department related Parliamentary Standing Committee on

21169ec

Health and Family welfare presently examining the National Commission for Human

Resources for Health Bill, 2011. It was also informed that the Committee has decided to have interaction with various stakeholder/expert in connection with

examination of the said bill, therefore, it has been decided to hear views in its

meeting scheduled to be held on 07.06.2012 on the above said bill.

It was also noted that Vaidya Raghunandan Sharma, President, CCIM has been

invited to appear before the Committee at 4.00 PM in Thursday, 07.06.2012, in

Room No. 62, First Floor, Parliament House, New Delhi., for the purpose.

The matter was discussed in the detail and it was decided to place

following facts before the Parliamentary Committee with the opinion of that these systems need encouragement from Govt. of India to develop in

respect to the medical heritage of India. Any attempt of including this

sector in this bill will hamper the growth of Indian System of Medicine. It

was also decided that all three Vice-President will also accompany President, CCIM to attend the meeting.

“The Bill which is before the Parliamentary Standing committee on Health &Family Welfare does not have any reference to Central Council of Indian Medicine.

The Central Council of Indian Medicine consist of four systems of Medicine

a)Ayurveda

b) Unani

c) Siddha

d) Aamchi

Functioning with the Vice-President for each system who is the chairman of the

system headed by a President.

It has a democratic set up with members elected from the practitioners, elected

from the Faculties of the Universities & also nominated from the Central Government from their respective systems who works for the development of this

system.

Ayurveda literature are available mainly in Sanskrit Ayurveda cannot be understood without the knowledge of Sanskrit .In the Similar manner,Siddha

literature exists in Tamil language and Unani literature in Urdu, Arabic and Persian

language, Aamchi literature in Tibetian language.

Hence these systems of Medicines has its own basic principles and holistic approach

which cannot be compared with Modern system.

Likewise, these systems have separate pharmacopeia and various research studies

has made these systems emerge out globally.But the departments covered in the

Bill are all pertaining to modern medicine which are governed by the same pharmacopeia.

Indian systems of Medicine faced lot of suppression during British period and lead to the deprival of its growth.

22169ec

It is slowly grooming after independence and gaining its lusture because of separate functioning of the council.

These systems which were taught in Gurukula now has its own identity at

international level because council is separately functioning and designed UG,PG Courses in their own system which is competent .Many achievements are made

possible only after the establishment of the council as separate.

CCIM at present is focused on quality education, 262 Ayurveda, 41 Unani and 09

Siddha Undergraduate & Post graduate colleges which has been appreciated by the

department of AYUSH.

It will be appropriate to develop a mechanism to ascertain the transparency and

efficiency of these councils inspite of centralize the presently all councils. So that

the each systems may develop in own way. It will be problematic to regulate all the system in centralized manner.

If it is merged with the modern authority and linked, once again these systems of medicine will face difficulty in its growth and gets paralyzed.

It is always better to have as separate council for the betterment and growth of the system.”

Executive Committee decided that remaining Agenda be placed before next

meeting to be held on 19.06.2012.

Meeting concluded with the thanks to the chair.

***** ***

***

**

*

CENTRAL COUNCIL OF INDIAN MEDICINE NEW DELHIccimindia.org/meeting_file/pdf/pdf/ec_31-05-2012.pdf ·...

Documents

Transcript of CENTRAL COUNCIL OF INDIAN MEDICINE NEW DELHIccimindia.org/meeting_file/pdf/pdf/ec_31-05-2012.pdf ·...