Center for National Response Operational Test Report for ...€¦ · Center for National Response...

51
C ENTER FOR N ATIONAL R ESPONSE - O PERATIONAL T EST AND E VALUATION P ROGRAM CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002 REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 Center for National Response Operational Test Report for the Tempest Technology Corporation Mobile Ventilation Unit (MVU) Test Series CNR02-06-01 27 June, 2002 Prepared by: Center for National Response Operational Testing Division Science Applications International Corporation 8301 Greensboro Drive, Suite 120 McLean, Virginia 22102 Prepared for: National Guard Bureau 9 August, 2002

Transcript of Center for National Response Operational Test Report for ...€¦ · Center for National Response...

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004

Center for National Response Operational Test Report

for the Tempest Technology Corporation

Mobile Ventilation Unit (MVU)

Test Series CNR02-06-01 27 June, 2002

Prepared by: Center for National Response Operational Testing Division

Science Applications International Corporation 8301 Greensboro Drive, Suite 120

McLean, Virginia 22102

Prepared for: National Guard Bureau

9 August, 2002

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 1

Disclaimer

The findings in this report are not to be construed as an official National Guard Bureau position unless so

designated by other authorized documents.

Trade Names

Use of trade names or manufacturers in this report does not constitute an official endorsement or approval of the

use of such commercial hardware or software.

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 2

Center for National Response Test Report Table of Contents

Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... 3

1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 4

1.1 Testing Objective............................................................................................................4 1.2 Testing Authority.............................................................................................................5 1.3 Test Concepts ................................................................................................................5 1.4 Unit Under Test Description ...........................................................................................5 1.5 Unique Personnel Requirements....................................................................................5

2.0 Test Series CNR02-06-01 - Tempest Technologies MVU.............................. 6

2.1 Schedule.........................................................................................................................6 2.2 Participants.....................................................................................................................6 2.3 Test Objectives, Criteria, and Procedures......................................................................6

3.0 Operational Test Results............................................................................... 12

3.1 Baseline Test................................................................................................................13 3.2 PPV (South to North) Operational Testing ...................................................................14 3.3 PPV (North to South) Operational Testing ...................................................................15 3.4 PPV (South moving North) Operational Testing...........................................................17 3.5 Decontamination of Personnel Utilizing UUT and Misting Ring....................................18 3.6 Decontamination of Vehicles Utilizing UUT and Misting Ring ......................................20

4.0 Conclusions ................................................................................................... 21

4.1 Analysis of System’s Capabilities and Limitations........................................................21 4.2 Lessons Learned ..........................................................................................................21 4.3 Suggested Refinements ...............................................................................................21

Appendices.................................................................................................................. 22

Appendix A - Test Data Sheets ...............................................................................................23 Appendix B - Test Photos........................................................................................................42 Appendix C - Operational Test Schedule ................................................................................45 Appendix D - UUT Specifications ............................................................................................46 Appendix E - Points of Contact ...............................................................................................48 Appendix F - Acronyms and Abbreviations .............................................................................49 Appendix G - References ........................................................................................................50

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 3

Executive Summary

The operational testing and evaluation program at the Center for National Response (CNR) is a multi-faceted program that encompasses a wide range of sophisticated operational testing and evaluation processes. These activities include a seamless integration of the exercise, operational testing, and evaluation procedures. The emphasis is on evaluating tools in a realistic operational environment with missions that responders will be tasked to accomplish. The Operational Test and Evaluation Program of the CNR conducted Test Series CNR02-06-01 of the Tempest Technology Corporation Mobile Ventilation Unit (MVU) on 27 June 2002. Test operators for this test series were firefighters from the 130th Airlift Wing (AW), West Virginia Air National Guard (WVANG). None of the operators had any previous experience operating the unit under test (UUT). The MVU provides positive pressure ventilation (PPV) in a large enclosed structure and can be mounted on a truck, trailer, or skid. A trailer mounted MVU was utilized for this test iteration. The MVU works by creating an air seal at the entrance point and pressurizing a structure. The resulting airflow blows clean, fresh air into the structure, forcing out heat, smoke, gasses and other contaminates. It can be used to ventilate any size or shape structure, as long as there is an entrance point for the clean air and an exit point for the contaminated air. Test objectives for Test Series CNR02-06-01 were to: (1) examine the utility of the MVU to materially aid civilian and military emergency responders in the conduct of the response and recovery phases of their mission in a tunnel environment; and (2) examine the utility of the MVU configured with the Tempest Misting Ring in decontamination applications. Test operators were pleased with the performance of the UUT. They found that, with limited training, the UUT was easy to operate in a simulated weapon of mass destruction (WMD) and emergency response environment. It provided them with an efficient way to clear a contained area of smoke in an expedient manner. The revised date on this test report is due to the removal of the "Limited Distribution" classification and serves to update the point of contact information.

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 4

1.0 Introduction

1.1 Testing Objective

The Operational Test and Evaluation Program at the CNR is a multi-faceted program that encompasses a wide range of sophisticated operational testing and evaluation processes. These activities include a seamless integration of the exercise, operational testing, and evaluation procedures. These procedures are executed by integrating the operational testing and evaluation into an exercise scenario without altering the free play of the exercise. A comprehensive review of the operational testing and evaluation procedures are then documented in a test report; found herein. The test activities are designed to serve three key program objectives:

Operational test and evaluation of equipment, technologies, and apparatus for effective use in large-scale hazardous material and WMD response operations;

Provision of operational data for future development and improvement of technical capabilities by developers, vendors, or other program sponsors; and

Provision of data and information for National Guard Bureau (NGB) and the consequence management community on the utility and effectiveness of the CNR in training and test support missions.

Test objectives for Test Series CNR02-06-01 were to: (1) examine the utility of the MVU to materially aid civilian and military emergency responders in the conduct of the response and recovery phases of their mission in a tunnel environment; and (2) examine the utility of the MVU configured with the Tempest Misting Ring in decontamination applications. Figure 1-1 provides a picture of the Tempest Technologies MVU.

Figure 1-1. Tempest Technologies MVU

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 5

1.2 Testing Authority

In fiscal year 2000, Congress directed the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) to “establish a cost effective counterterrorism training program for first responders and concurrent testing of response apparatus and equipment at the [West Virginia] Memorial Tunnel.” The CNR is currently under the direction of the NGB. The CNR program includes an integrated contractor support team comprised of a Program Management and Training and Exercise Division led by Titan Systems Corporation and a Testing Division led by Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC).

The CNR test program will evolve and be implemented in accordance with the Consequence Management Program Integration Office (CoMPIO)-approved Implementation Plan (IPLAN), a dynamic planning document that reflects the priority training and testing needs to cost-effectively serve the response community. The IPLAN provides the Government's authority for Titan and its Team to operate the Facility. SAIC works as part of the integrated program team for the conduct of training, exercise, and evaluation of individual, unit/organizational, and equipment technical operations. This support will occur continuously as each phase of the IPLAN is reviewed and approved by the U.S. Government and implemented by the program support team. 1.3 Test Concepts

The Operational Test and Evaluation Program at the CNR is a multi-faceted program that encompasses a wide range of sophisticated operational testing and evaluation processes. These activities include a seamless integration of the exercise, operational testing, and evaluation procedures. These procedures are executed by integrating the operational testing and evaluation into the exercise scenario without altering the free play of the exercise. A detailed operational testing and evaluation period and After-Action Reviews (AAR) follow the exercise. This iteration of operational testing did not occur concurrently with an exercise. To ensure operational realism, test operators engaged in testing the UUT within a smoke-filled tunnel environment, simulating a tunnel fire, and in the South Portal Entrance area of the Tunnel to simulate a mass decontamination line. 1.4 Unit Under Test Description

The MVU provides PPV for firefighters in a large, enclosed structure and works by creating an air-seal at the entrance point, thus pressurizing the structure. The resulting airflow blows clean, fresh air into the structure, forcing out heat, smoke, gasses, and other contaminants. It can be used to ventilate any size or shape structure, as long as there is an entrance point for the clean air and an exit point for the contaminated air. The unit can be mounted on a truck, trailer, or skid and has a Scissors Lift capable of an additional elevation of up to 10 feet (3,000 mm). The fan portion of the unit can rotate 360° and has a pitch of 35° (Up/Down). 1.5 Unique Personnel Requirements

Personnel from the 130th AW, WVANG operated the UUT. The operators had no previous experience operating the UUT.

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 6

2.0 Test Series CNR02-06-01 - Tempest Technologies MVU

2.1 Schedule

Operational Testing of the MVU was conducted on 27 June 2002. The schedule, with specific times for each test, is provided in Appendix D. 2.2 Participants

Operational Test participants are identified in Table 2-1.

Name and Organization SAIC Mickey Kirschenbaum, Test Director Allison Voight, Test Controller Brendon LaTurno, Test Controller Howard Murphy, Test Controller Forrest Church, Test Controller Dutch Thomas, Test Controller Titan Don Fike, CNR Safety Officer and Logistics Support 130th AW/FD, WV-ANG

Olaf Funfstuck II, Test Operator William Allen Gannon, Test Operator

Tempest Technology Dexter Coffman, Manufacturer Representative Leroy Coffman, Manufacturer Representative Juergen Bader, Manufacturer Representative Tom Fox, Manufacturer Representative

Table 2-1. Operational Test Participants 2.3 Test Objectives, Criteria, and Procedures

2.3.1 Baseline Test 2.3.1.1 Objective The objective of Test 1 was to determine the amount of time required to naturally clear the tunnel of smoke. 2.3.1.2 Criteria Test criteria were defined by the ability of natural airflow to clear the tunnel of smoke. All observations and anomalies were evaluated to determine their impact on mission performance.

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 7

2.3.1.3 Test Procedures Step 1: Determine wind speed and direction of natural air movement in the tunnel. Record all results. Step 2: Detonate a M-18 smoke grenade at the 1,400-foot marker. No observable. Step 3: Determine visual acuity at 1,400-foot marker and 2,800-foot marker (North

Portal Entrance) and (2) wind speed at 700-foot marker, 1,400-foot marker, 2,100 foot marker, and 2,800 foot marker (North Portal Entrance).

Record all results. Step 4: Using visual acuity at 1,400-foot marker and 2,800-foot marker, determine when

tunnel is clear of all smoke. Record elapsed time and all results. Step 5: End test. No observations.

2.3.1.4 Data Required A record was made of all environmental parameters, operational conditions, and discrepancies between the planned test and the actual test during each step. Photographs were taken of various aspects of the operational test. A record was made of any discrepancies noted before, during, or after the inspection/functional checkout. 2.3.1.5 Data Analysis/Procedures An assessment of the facility was made before testing. All anomalies were addressed and, if possible, corrected or waived prior to the initiation of testing. 2.3.2 PPV (South to North) Operational Testing

2.3.2.1 Objective The objective of Test 2 was to examine the ability of the operator to utilize the UUT to provide PPV and eliminate smoke from the tunnel. 2.3.2.2 Criteria Test criteria were defined by the ability of the operator to utilize the MVU to provide PPV and clear the tunnel of smoke. All observations and anomalies were evaluated to determine their impact on mission performance. 2.3.2.3 Test Procedures

Step 1: Operator 1 conducts situational assessment of incident site. Observe operator actions and record all results. Step 2: Operators position UUT 75 feet from the South Portal Entrance. Observe operator actions and record all results. Step 3: Operators power up UUT and conduct baseline check of all systems functions. Observe operator actions and record all results.

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 8

Step 4: Initiate PPV. Observe operator actions. Record: (1) visual acuity at 1,400-foot marker and

2,800-foot marker (North Portal Entrance) and (2) wind speed at 700-foot marker, 1,400-foot marker, 2,100-foot marker, and 2,800-foot marker (North Portal Entrance).

Step 5: UUT operates until tunnel is clear of all smoke. Observe operator actions and record time until smoke has cleared the tunnel. Step 6: Operator 1 conducts situational assessment of incident site. Observe and record all results. Step 7: Power down UUT and conduct baseline check of all systems functions.

Observe operator actions and record all results.

2.3.2.4 Data Required A record was made of all environmental parameters, operational conditions, and discrepancies between the planned test and the actual test during each step. Photographs were taken of various aspects of the operational test. A record was made of any discrepancies noted before, during, or after the inspection/functional checkout. 2.3.2.5 Data Analysis/Procedures An assessment of the UUT was made before testing. All anomalies were addressed and, if possible, corrected or waived prior to the initiation of testing. Based on observation and feedback from test operators, the utility of the UUT to accomplish the designated mission was determined. A comparative analysis of the UUT with similar products was not conducted. 2.3.3 PPV (North to South) Operational Testing

2.3.3.1 Objective The objective of Test 3 was to examine the ability of the operator to utilize the UUT to provide PPV and eliminate smoke from the tunnel.

2.3.3.2 Test Criteria Test criteria were defined by the ability of the operator to utilize the MVU to provide PPV and clear the tunnel of smoke. All observations and anomalies were evaluated to determine their impact on mission performance. 2.3.3.3 Test Procedures

Step 1: Operator 1 conducts situational assessment of incident site. Observe operator actions and record all results. Step 2: Operators position UUT 75 feet from North Portal Entrance. Observe operator actions and record all results. Step 3: Operators power up UUT and conduct baseline check of all systems functions. Observe operator actions and record all results. Step 4: Initiate PPV. Observe operator actions. Record: (1) visual acuity at 1,400-foot marker and

2,800-foot marker (North Portal Entrance) and (2) wind speed at 700-foot marker, 1,400-foot marker, 2,100-foot marker, and 2,800-foot marker (North Portal Entrance).

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 9

Step 5: UUT operates until tunnel is clear of all smoke. Observe operator actions and record time until smoke has cleared the tunnel. Step 6: Operator 1 conducts situational assessment of incident site. Observe and record all results. Step 7: Power down UUT and conduct baseline check of all systems functions.

Observe operator actions and record all results. 2.3.3.4 Data Required A record was made of all environmental parameters, operational conditions, and discrepancies between the planned test and the actual test during each step. Photographs were taken of various aspects of the operational test. A record was made of any discrepancies noted before, during or after the inspection/functional checkout. 2.3.3.5 Data Analysis/Procedures An assessment of the UUT was made before testing. All anomalies were addressed and, if possible, corrected or waived prior to the initiation of testing. Based on observation and feedback from test operators, the utility of the UUT to accomplish the designated mission was determined. A comparative analysis of the UUT with similar products was not conducted. 2.3.4 PPV (Moving North) Operational Testing

2.3.4.1 Objective The objective of Test 4 was to examine the ability of the operator to utilize the UUT to by moving the UUT inside the tunnel to eliminate the smoke.

2.3.4.2 Test Criteria Test criteria were defined by the ability of the operator to utilize the MVU to provide PPV and clear the tunnel of smoke. All observations and anomalies were evaluated to determine their impact on mission performance. 2.3.4.3 Test Procedures

Step 1: Operator 1 conducts situational assessment of incident site. Observe operator actions and record all results. Step 2: Operators position UUT at South Portal Entrance. Observe operator actions and record all results. Step 3: Operators power up UUT and conduct baseline check of all systems functions. Observe operator actions and record all results. Step 4: Initiate PPV. Observe operator actions and record wind speed at 1,400-foot marker. Step 5: Move UUT to 100-foot marker. Observe and record wind speed at 1400-foot marker. Step 6: Move UUT to 200-foot marker. Observe and record wind speed at 1,400-foot marker. Step 7: Move UUT to 300-foot marker. Observe and record wind speed at 1,400-foot marker. Step 8: Move UUT to 400-foot marker. Observe and record (1) wind speed at 1,400-foot marker and (2) visual acuity at

2,800-foot marker (North Portal Entrance).

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 10

Step 9: Move UUT to 500-foot marker. Observe and record (1) wind speed at 1,400 foot marker and (2) visual acuity at

2,800-foot marker (North Portal Entrance). Step 10: Move UUT to 600-foot marker. Observe and record (1) wind speed at 1,400-foot marker and (2) visual acuity

at 2,800-foot marker (North Portal Entrance). Step 11: Move UUT to 700-foot marker. Observe and record (1) wind speed at 1,400-foot marker and (2) visual acuity

at 2,800-foot marker (North Portal Entrance). Step 12: UUT operates until tunnel is clear of all smoke. Observe operator actions and record time until smoke has cleared the tunnel. Step 13: Operator 1 conducts situational assessment of incident site. Observe and record all results. Step 14: Power down UUT and conduct baseline check of all systems functions. Observe operator actions and record all results.

2.3.4.4 Data Required A record was made of all environmental parameters, operational conditions, and discrepancies between the planned test and the actual test during each step. Photographs were taken of various aspects of the operational test. A record was made of any discrepancies noted before, during, or after the inspection/functional checkout. 2.3.4.5 Data Analysis/Procedures An assessment of the UUT was made before testing. All anomalies were addressed and, if possible, corrected or waived prior to the initiation of testing. Based on observation and feedback from test operators, the utility of the UUT to accomplish the designated mission was determined. A comparative analysis of the UUT with similar products was not conducted. 2.3.5 Decontamination of Personnel Utilizing UUT and Misting Ring

2.3.5.1 Objective The objective of Test 5 was to examine the ability of the operator to utilize the UUT configured with the Misting Ring to decontaminate personnel.

2.3.5.2 Test Criteria Test criteria were defined by the degree and ease that the MVU can be used to decontaminate personnel. All observations and anomalies were evaluated to determine their impact on mission performance. 2.3.5.3 Test Procedures

Step 1: Test Subjects are sprayed with florescent material. Using black light, photograph sprayed areas. Step 2: Operators establish a decontamination area at the South Portal Entrance. Observe operator actions and record all results. Step 3: Operators position UUT with Misting Ring 75 feet from South Portal Entrance. Observe operator actions and record all results. Step 4: Operators power up UUT and conduct baseline check of all systems functions. Observe operator actions and record all results.

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 11

Step 5: Initiate PPV with Misting Ring. Observe operator actions. Record wind speed at 100, 150, and 200 feet from

UUT and all results. Step 6: Test Subject 1, positioned at the 500-foot marker, and Test Subject 2,

positioned at the 1000-foot marker, walk toward the decontamination area at a normal pace.

Observe test subjects actions. Upon exiting the tunnel, record: (1) total time, (2) amount of moisture on clothing, (3) areas of the body that were not affected by the UUT, and (4) physical condition of the test subjects.

Step 7: Using black light, check Test Subjects to determine if they were properly decontaminated.

Photograph sprayed areas and record all results. Step 8: Power down UUT and conduct baseline check of all systems functions.

Observe operator actions and record all results. Step 9: End test.

No observations. . 2.3.5.4 Data Required A record was made of all environmental parameters, operational conditions, and discrepancies between the planned test and the actual test during each step. Photographs were taken of various aspects of the operational test. A record was made of any discrepancies noted before, during or after the inspection/functional checkout. 2.3.5.5 Data Analysis/Procedures An assessment of the UUT was made before testing. All anomalies were addressed and, if possible, corrected or waived prior to the initiation of testing. Based on observation and feedback from test operators, the utility of the UUT to accomplish the designated mission was determined. A comparative analysis of the UUT with similar products was not conducted. 2.3.6 Decontamination of Vehicles Utilizing UUT and Misting Ring

2.3.6.1 Objective The objective of Test 6 was to examine the ability of the operator to utilize the UUT configured with the Misting Ring to decontaminate vehicles.

2.3.6.2 Test Criteria Test criteria were defined by the degree and ease that the MVU can be used to decontaminate vehicles. All observations and anomalies were evaluated to determine their impact on mission performance. 2.3.6.3 Test Procedures

Step 1: Vehicles are sprayed with florescent material. Using black light, photograph sprayed areas. Step 2: Operators position UUT with Misting Ring 75 feet from test vehicles. Observe operator actions and record all results. Step 3: Operators power up UUT and conduct baseline check of all systems functions. Observe operator actions and record all results.

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 12

Step 4: Initiate PPV with misting ring for 5 minutes. Observe operator actions. Record wind speed at 100, 150, and 200 feet from

UUT and all results. Step 5: Cease PPV with Misting Ring. Observe operator actions and record all results. Step 6: Using black light, check sprayed areas of vehicles. Photograph sprayed areas and record all results. Step 7: If vehicles were not completely decontaminated, initiate PPV with Misting Ring

for an additional 5 minutes. Observe operator actions and record all result. Step 8: Cease PPV with misting ring. Observe operator actions and record all results. Step 9: Using black light, check sprayed areas of vehicles. Photograph sprayed areas and record all results. Step 10: If vehicles were not completely decontaminated, initiate PPV with Misting Ring

for an additional 5 minutes. Observe operator actions and record all result. Step 11: Cease PPV with misting ring. Observe operator actions and record all results. Step 12: Using black light, check sprayed areas of vehicles. Photograph sprayed areas and record all results. Step 13: If vehicles were not completely decontaminated, initiate PPV with Misting Ring

an additional 5 minutes. Observe operator actions and record all result. Step 14: Cease PPV with Misting Ring. Observe operator actions and record all results. Step 15: Using black light, check sprayed areas of vehicles. Photograph sprayed areas and record all results. Step 16: End test. No observations.

2.3.6.4 Data Required A record was made of all environmental parameters, operational conditions, and discrepancies between the planned test and the actual test during each step. Photographs were taken of various aspects of the operational test. A record was made of any discrepancies noted before, during, or after the inspection/functional checkout. 2.3.6.5 Data Analysis/Procedures An assessment of the UUT was made before testing. All anomalies were addressed and, if possible, corrected or waived prior to the initiation of testing. Based on observation and feedback from test operators, the utility of the UUT to accomplish the designated mission was determined. A comparative analysis of the UUT with similar products was not conducted.

3.0 Operational Test Results

The test operators for all CNR02-06-01 tests were Staff Sergeant (SSgt) Olaf Funfstuck II and SSgt William Allen Gannon, firefighters from the 130th AW, WVANG. The test operators had no previous experience with the UUT or similar technology. Prior to testing, Juergen Bader and

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 13

Leroy Coffman from Tempest Technology Corporation provided a one-half hour training session on the operation of the UUT. Due to performance of the UUT and the configuration of the ventilation within the tunnel, Test 3, PPV (Moving North), was conducted from a stationary point 100 feet inside the South Portal Entrance, instead of moving the UUT from the south to north end of the tunnel. This test change provided a better test of the unit’s capabilities and produced a more realistic testing scenario. In order to provide a safer testing environment, smoke generators were used instead of smoke grenades. Two Tempest Technology Corporation smoke generators were started at the 1,400-foot marker inside the tunnel and ran for 10 minutes at the beginning of each test. This caused completely obscured visibility in the immediate area (a 200-foot wide cloud of smoke).

All measurements recorded within this test report are south to north. Testing began at 10:00 and ended at 16:30. Test controllers were Mickey Kirschenbaum, Allison Voight, Brendon LaTurno, Howard Murphy, Forrest Church, and Dutch Thomas of SAIC.

3.1 Baseline Test

Prior to the start of the test, smoke was generated from two smoke generators for 10 minutes. The doors at the North and South Portals were open during this test event. The smoke generators were run for 10 minutes at the 1,400-foot location inside the tunnel. When smoke generation ended, visibility at the 1,400-foot location was completely obscured. For the first 30 minutes of the test, the smoke oscillated somewhat; however, visibility did not markedly improve. After 30 minutes, the smoke began to slowly clear, and visibility improved towards

Figure 3-1. Generating Smoke with Tempest Shadow 2 Smoke Generators

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 14

both the North and South Portals. Test controllers determined that emergency responders would have had sufficient visibility to perform their mission 30 minutes into the test event. After 52 minutes, test controllers determined that the smoke movement was stagnant. Testing began at 15:12 and ended at 16:04. Test controllers were Forrest Church and Dutch Thomas of SAIC. 3.1.1 Test Observations

The natural airflow through the tunnel proved insufficient to clear the tunnel of smoke. At the start of the test, wind speed at the 1,400-foot mark registered at 0.81 miles per hour (MPH) from north to south. This test provided the test team with a basic understanding through observation of the airflow dynamics within the tunnel for that specific time. See Table 3-1 for test timeline.

Time Event 15:12 Smoke generators starts at the 1,400 foot marker.

Natural airflow is north to south. 15:22 Smoke generation ended. 15:24 Air speed was calm with no natural air movement.

Smoke plume begins oscillating. 15:32 Smoke plume begins noticeable movement towards the south. 15:33 At the 1,400 foot marker, there is 10 ft. visibility with wind speed

at 1.0 MPH (north to south and south to north). 15:59 Smoke moves to between 600-800 feet from the South Portal

entrance. Wind speed is 1.4 MPH (north to south) 16:00 South Portal entrance visible from the 1,000 foot marker. 16:04 End test.

Table 3-1. Test 1 Timeline 3.2 PPV (South to North) Operational Testing

The UUT was stationed outside the South Portal Entrance while two smoke generators were run for 10 minutes at the 1,400 foot marker inside the tunnel. When smoke generation ended, visibility at the 1,400 foot marker was completely obscured. Once the PPV began, wind speed and airflow from the South Portal increased above the control point (see Table 3-2) and the smoke began to move towards the North Portal. In less than 10 minutes, all smoke had moved past the 1,800 foot marker. After 13 minutes, the manufacturer’s representative shut down the UUT. He had stated that from the operators’ vantage point, it had appeared that the smoke had stalled and was no longer moving. This was incorrect since the test observers were still recording movement. While the tunnel was not completely cleared of smoke, test controllers called end test since PPV was no longer in effect and the UUT would had to have been restarted.

Distance Marker Control/Baseline PPV (South to North) 800 feet 1.5 MPH 2.0 MPH

1,400 feet 0.81 MPH - 2,200 feet 0.0 MPH -

Table 3-2. Wind Speed Recordings Taken During Test 2

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 15

Testing began at 10:36 and ended at 11:02. Test controllers were Mickey Kirschenbaum, Allison Voight, Brendon LaTurno, Howard Murphy, Forrest Church and Dutch Thomas of SAIC. 3.2.1 Test Observations

When end test was called, test controllers at the 1,400 foot marker noticed that the smoke had dissipated, but had not completely cleared the tunnel. It was determined that there was enough visibility at the 1,400-foot marker for emergency responders to perform their mission. Test controllers at the UUT did not observe test operators experiencing any difficulties operating the UUT. Test operators reported no difficulty in operating the UUT. The unit was not able to achieve optimal PPV due to the presence of multiple ventilation ports in the tunnel that allowed for air to escape from more than one point. See Table 3-3 for test timeline.

Time Event 10:36:00 Smoke generators started at1,400 foot marker.

Natural airflow is north to south. 10:46:00 Smoke generation ends. 10:49:37 MVU starts at South Portal entrance.

PPV begins. 10:50:00 Smoke plume moves toward the North Portal entrance. 10:54:00 At 1,800-foot marker, visibility is 10-15 feet in both directions. 10:56:00 Smoke plume reaches 2,800-foot marker. 10:58:00 At 1,800-foot marker, visibility is 50 feet in both directions. 11:00:45 At 1,400-foot marker, visibility is 200 feet to the south. 11:01:30 At 1,800-foot marker, visibility is 200 feet to the north. 11:02:11 MVU shut-down by manufacturer.

Table 3-3. Test 2 Timeline 3.3 PPV (North to South) Operational Testing

The UUT was stationed 40 feet outside the North Portal Entrance. Two smoke generators were run for 10 minutes at the beginning of the test exercise at the 1,400 foot marker. When the smoke generation ended, visibility at the 1,400 foot marker was completely obscured. Upon initiation of PPV, wind speed at the 2,200-foot marker increased to 2.53 MPH. Within 10 minutes, a majority of the smoke had moved to the South Portal Entrance of the tunnel. After 23 minutes, test controllers determined that the tunnel was clear of smoke and end test was called. Testing began at 13:58 and ended at 14:22. Test controllers were Mickey Kirschenbaum, Allison Voight, Brendon LaTurno, Howard Murphy, Forrest Church and Dutch Thomas of SAIC. 3.3.1 Test Observations

The performance of the UUT in this test exercise showed marked improvement over previous test exercises from the southern portion of the tunnel, due to the ability to seal the northern portal of the tunnel enabling PPV. Due to logistics, this test was performed after tests 2 and 4. Test controllers at the UUT did not observe test operators experiencing any difficulties operating the UUT. Test operators reported that they had no difficulty operating the UUT and the UUT was operated until the tunnel was clear of smoke (23 minutes). The obstructions in the tunnel

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 16

(trailers, vehicles, small buildings, etc.) did not appear to significantly affect the performance of the UUT. See Table 3-4 for test timeline.

Time Event 13:58:17 Smoke generators starts at1,400 foot marker.

Natural airflow is north to south. 14:08:17 Smoke generation ends. 14:08:26 MVU starts at North Portal entrance.

PPV begins. 14:08:30 At the 2,700 foot marker, clear visibility. 14:09:00 Smoke plume reaches 1,800 foot marker. 14:09:10 At the 2,600 foot marker, clear visibility. 14:09:20 At the 1,800 foot marker, 15 foot visibility. 14:09:30 At the 2,500 foot marker, clear visibility. 14:10:00 At the 2,400 foot marker, clear visibility. 14:10:10 At the 1,800 foot marker, 3 foot visibility with a wind speed of

4.4 MPH. 14:10:30 At the 2,100 foot marker, clear visibility. 14:11:00 At the 2,000 foot marker, clear visibility.

The smoke is traveling swiftly. 14:11:15 At the 1,800 foot marker, 10 foot visibility with a wind speed of

4.4 MPH. 14:11:30 At the 1,700 foot marker, clear visibility. 14:12:00 At the 1,800 foot marker, 20 foot visibility with a wind speed of

4.4 MPH. 14:12:10 At the 1,500 foot marker, clear visibility.

The smoke is traveling slowly. 14:13:00 At the 1,800 foot marker, 30 foot visibility with a wind speed of

4.4 MPH. 14:14:00 At the 1,800 foot marker, 75 foot visibility with a wind speed of

3.6 MPH. 14:14:22 At the 1,200 foot marker, clear visibility.

The smoke is density decreasing. 14:15:00 At the 1,800 foot maker, 200 foot visibility with a speed of 3.4

MPH. 14:16:00 At the 1,800 foot maker, 400 foot visibility with a wind speed of

3.6 MPH. 14:16:10 At the 1,800 foot maker, clear visibility.

The smoke layering and density is no longer changing. 14:17:00 At the 1,800 foot maker, 600 foot visibility with a wind speed of

3.5 MPH. 14:17:44 At the 800 foot maker, clear visibility.

The smoke layering and density is no longer changing. 14:18:00 At the 1,800 foot maker, 600 foot visibility with a wind speed of

3.2 MPH. Table 3-4. Test 3 Timeline

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 17

Time Event 14:19:00 Upper half of South Portal entrance visible from the 700 foot

marker. 14:19:10 At the 1,800 foot maker, 1000 foot visibility with a wind speed

of 3.5 MPH. South Portal entrance is visible.

14:21:00 At the 400 foot marker, clear visibility. The remaining smoke is not dense enough to impeded emergency operations.

14:21:56 End test and MVU shut-down. Table 3-4. Test 3 Timeline (continued)

3.4 PPV (South moving North) Operational Testing

Prior to testing, test operators, test controllers, and the manufacturer’s representatives determined that leaving the unit stationary instead of moving it north would provide a better test of the UUT and a more realistic testing scenario. The UUT was stationed 100 feet inside the South Portal Entrance. Two smoke generators were run for 10 minutes at the beginning of the test exercise at the 1,400 foot marker. When the smoke generation ended, visibility at the 1,400 foot marker was completely obscured. Upon initiation of PPV, the smoke began to move towards the North Portal. Within 10 minutes, a majority of the tunnel was clear of smoke, the exception being at the northernmost end of the tunnel. After 25 minutes, the tunnel was clear of smoke and UUT operations were terminated. See Table 3-5 for wind speed measurements.

Distance Marker Control/Baseline PPV (South to North) 800 feet 1.5 MPH 1.5 MPH 1400 feet 0.81 MPH 1.61 MPH 2200 feet 0.0 MPH 1.5 MPH

Table 3-5. Wind Speed Measurements During PPV (South moving North) Test Testing began at 11:22 and ended at 12:00. Test controllers were Mickey Kirschenbaum, Allison Voight, Brendon LaTurno, Howard Murphy, Forrest Church, and Dutch Thomas of SAIC. 3.4.1 Test Observations

The UUT’s performance improved markedly in this test over its performance in Test 2 because it was moved past the additional ventilation ports. However, it was unable to achieve PPV due to the inability to seal the tunnel entrance during MVU operations in this series of tests. Most of the air was forced out of the north end of the tunnel; however, it appeared that some of the air was caught in a vortex above the unit, and air was still escaping through the additional ventilation at the south end of the tunnel. Test controllers positioned at the UUT did not observe test operators experiencing any difficulties operating the UUT. Test operators reported that they had no difficulty operating the UUT and the UUT was operated until the tunnel was clear of smoke. The obstructions in the tunnel (trailers, vehicles, small buildings, etc.) did not appear to significantly affect the performance of the UUT. See Table 3-6 for test timeline.

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 18

Time Event 11:22:45 Smoke generators start at1,400 foot marker.

Natural airflow is north to south. 11:32:45 Smoke generation ends. 11:33:40 MVU starts at North Portal entrance.

PPV begins. 11:34:22 At 1,800 foot marker, smoke movement observed. 11:34:30 At 1,800 foot marker, 400 foot visibility. 11:35:00 At 300 foot marker, zero visibility. 11:35:30 At 1,800 foot marker, 200 foot visibility. 11:36:00 At 1,800 foot marker, 100 foot visibility 11:36:30 At 500 foot marker, 5 foot visibility. 11:37:00 At 600 foot marker, 5-6 foot visibility. 11:37:30 At 1,800 foot marker, 20 foot visibility. 11:37:15 Smoke plume reaches 1,800 foot marker. 11:38:00 At 700 foot marker, 6 foot visibility. 11:38:30 At 1,800 foot marker, 10 foot visibility. 11:39:00 At 1,800 foot marker, 5 foot visibility. 11:39:30 At 800 foot marker, 20 foot visibility. 11:40:00 At 800 foot marker, South Portal visible and 40 foot visibility to the

north. 11:40:30 At 1,800 foot marker, 5 foot visibility. 11:41:00 At 900 foot marker, 50 foot visibility.

Smoke estimated to be 50% dissipated. 11:41:30 At 1,800 foot marker, 15 foot visibility. 11:42:00 At 1,000 foot marker, smoke moving at a walking pace. 11:42:15 At 1,800 foot marker, 50 foot visibility. 11:42:30 At 1,100 foot marker, good visibility. 11:43:00 At 1,800 foot marker, 75 foot visibility. 11:43:35 At 1,400 foot marker, 125 foot visibility.

Smoke is evenly distributed as a haze like atmosphere and no impediment to use of equipment with ambient light.

11:44:00 At 1,800 foot marker, 100 foot visibility. 11:45:00 At 1,800 foot marker, 100 foot visibility. 11:46:00 At 1,800 foot marker, 150 foot visibility. 11:47:00 At 1,800 foot marker, 150 foot visibility. 11:48:00 At 1,800 foot marker, 200 foot visibility.

North Portal can be seen. 11:56:51 Smoke clear of North portal and entire tunnel is clear. 12:01:30 End test and MVU shut-down.

Table 3-6. Test 4 Timeline 3.5 Decontamination of Personnel Utilizing UUT and Misting Ring

Prior to testing, three test subjects were dressed in various configurations (Level A personal protective equipment (PPE), Level B PPE, and a flight suit) and sprayed with a florescent glow-

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 19

in-the-dark spray, used as the simulated contaminant for the decontamination test exercises. The UUT was stationed outside the South Portal Entrance. A standard 2 ½-inch double-jacketed fire hose was attached to the UUT from the facilities water pump. The pump at the facility provides water at a rate of up to 80 pounds per minute. The UUT, configured with a Tempest Misting Ring and water, with no additives, was used to decontaminate three individuals in various levels of protective or standard clothing. The individuals proceeded from the South Portal Entrance to the decontamination area, which was directly outside the tunnel entrance (see Figure 3-2). While in the decontamination area, the test participants rotated their stationary positions under the MVU Misting Ring water decontamination for 2 minutes before exiting the decontamination area. After 5 minutes, the UUT was shut down and end test was called. The test subjects were examined with an ultraviolet light in order to detect the florescent spray.

Testing began at 15:25 and ended at 15:30. Test controllers were Mickey Kirschenbaum, Allison Voight, Brendon LaTurno, and Howard Murphy of SAIC. 3.5.1 Test Observations

Test controllers observed that there were slight traces of the simulated contaminant remaining under the arms and on the backs of the test participants in Level A and Level B PPE. Test controllers determined that this was due to test participants’ not adequately exposing those areas of the PPE to the decontaminant. Test controllers detected traces of the simulated contaminant on the NOMEX® flight suit worn by the third test participant. It appeared that the flight suit material had absorbed some of the simulated contaminant, though the bulk of it had been removed during the decontamination process. It was determined that the UUT performed adequately as a means of personnel expedient or “gross” decontamination. The UUT was

Figure 3-2. Decontamination of Personnel utilizing UUT and Misting Ring

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 20

capable of removing the majority of the contamination from the PPE without the use of additional decontamination equipment (e.g., brushes, additives). Test controllers did not observe any difficulties operating the device and test operators reported no difficulty operating the UUT. 3.6 Decontamination of Vehicles Utilizing UUT and Misting Ring

Prior to testing, one vehicle (large sport utility vehicle) was sprayed along its passenger side with a simulated contaminant and parked at the South Portal Entrance. The UUT was stationed outside the South Portal Entrance (see Figure 3-3). The vehicle underwent 4 minutes of MVU Misting Ring generated decontamination using water with no additives. After 4 minutes, the UUT was shut down and end test was called.

Testing began at 15:38 and ended at 15:42. Test controllers were Mickey Kirschenbaum, Allison Voight, Brendon LaTurno, and Howard Murphy of SAIC. 3.6.1 Test Observations

Test controllers detected trace amounts of the simulated contaminant without the aid of the black light. When using a black light, significant amounts of simulated contaminant was found concentrated in places where vehicle body panels and windows met. Most open surfaces were free from the simulated contaminant. It was determined that the unit performed less than adequately as a means of expedient or “gross” decontamination by itself and that the use of additional decontamination equipment (e.g., brushes, additives) would be necessary to remove the simulated contaminant from the vehicle’s exterior. Test controllers did not observe any difficulties operating the device. Test operators reported no difficulty operating the UUT.

Figure 3-3. Decontamination of SUV with MVU with Misting Ring

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 21

4.0 Conclusions

4.1 Analysis of System’s Capabilities and Limitations

4.1.1 Capabilities The operational test and evaluation revealed the following UUT capabilities:

There is a limited training period required prior to operation of the UUT. Operational proficiency in most aspects of the operation of the UUT can be gained with a one-half hour training session. The manufacturer’s representative did assist in the operation of the UUT for some testing.

The UUT is optimal for moving large quantities of air in a tunnel environment. The fan on the UUT is easily maneuverable. The controls on the MVU allow the operator

to adjust the fan from left to right and up and down, to place it in the desired position. The UUT performed adequately as a means of personnel expedient or “gross”

decontamination. 4.1.2 Limitations The operational test and evaluation revealed the following UUT limitations:

The UUT is not as effective when there are multiple ventilation exits from which air can escape.

The UUT is difficult to position on the trailer. It was determined that the UUT performed less than adequately as a means of expedient

or “gross” decontamination of vehicles.

4.2 Lessons Learned

Based on observations, the data collected, and UUT operator feedback, the following are lesson learned from this Test Series:

If possible, seal off any additional ventilation, leaving only one exit through which smoke and contaminated air can exit.

4.3 Suggested Refinements

Based on observations, the data collected, and UUT operator feedback, the CNR Operational Test and Evaluation Program recommends the following refinements:

Installing an alarm/safety switch that notifies the operator when the carriage is at rest. This would prevent the MVU from being transported in an unsafe manner. During testing, the MVU was transported while the carriage was not fully rested.

Use a joystick, instead of switches, to position the fan. This would allow the operator to position the fan without the restriction of looking at the controls.

Reconfigure the location of the control panel. In its current location, the heat from the radiator blows directly on the operator.

Add a water pressure gage for use with the Misting Ring. This would allow operators to determine the water pressure going into the MVU.

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 22

Appendices

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 23

Appendix A - Test Data Sheets

Test Data Sheet Test Series: CNR02-06-01 Test Organization: 130th WVANG FD Test Procedure Number: 1 Test Name: Baseline Test Test Location: CNR, Standard, WV Test Start Point: 1400 foot mark Date: 27 June 2002 Test Time (Start – End): 15:12 - 16:04 Test Controller Name: Forrest Church and Dutch Thomas Operator(s) Name(s): N/A

Environmental Conditions Light: 118 Lux Temperature: 70° Precipitation: None Humidity: High

Comments See Table 3-1 in Section 3.1 for a detailed test timeline.

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 24

Test Data Sheet for Test 1 Step # Observer Action Y N Not Observed Comments

1 Determine wind speed and direction of natural air movement in the tunnel. - Record all results.

Wind speed was 0.81 MPH from the north.

2 Detonate a M18 smoke grenade at the 1,400-foot marker. - Not observable.

Smoke generators were used instead of a M18 grenade.

3 Determine visual acuity at 1,400-foot marker and 2,800-foot marker (North Portal Entrance) and (2) wind speed at 700-foot marker, 1,400-foot marker, 2,100-foot marker, and 2,800-foot marker (North Portal Entrance). - Record all results.

Smoke oscillated with no appreciable improvement.

4 Using visual acuity at 1,400-foot marker and 2,800-foot marker, determine when tunnel is clear of all smoke. - Record elapsed time and all results.

End Test was called at 52 minutes; last remaining smoke had ceased to dissipate. Visibility was adequate for emergency operations.

5 End Test. - No observations .

OK.

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 25

Test Data Sheet Test Series: CNR02-06-01 Test Organization: 130th WVANG FD Test Procedure Number: 2 Test Name: PPV (South to North) Operational Testing Test Location: CNR, Standard, WV Test Start Point: Outside South portal Date: 27 June 2002 Test Time (Start – End): 1036 - 1102 Test Controller Name: Mickey Kirschenbaum, Allison Voight, Brendon LaTurno, Howard Murphy, Forrest Church and Dutch Thomas Operator(s) Name(s): SSgt Olaf Funfstuck II and SSgt William Allen Gannon

Environmental Conditions Light: 118 Lux Temperature: 70° Precipitation: None Humidity: High

Comments See Tables 3-2 and 3-3 in Section 3.2 for detailed wind speed recordings and test timeline.

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 26

Test Data Sheet for Test 2 Step # Observer Action Y N Not Observed Comments

1 Operator 1 conducts situational assessment of incident site. - Observe operator actions and record all results.

OK.

2 Operators position UUT 75 feet from South Portal Entrance. - Observe operator actions and record all results.

UUT was located 40 feet from entrance.

3 Operators power up UUT and conduct baseline check of all systems functions. - Observe operator actions and record all results.

OK.

4 Initiate PPV. - Observe operator actions. Record: (1) visual acuity at 1,400 foot marker and 2,800 foot marker (North Portal Entrance) and (2) wind speed at 700 foot marker, 1,400 foot marker, 2,100 foot marker, and 2,800 foot marker (North Portal Entrance).

See Tables 3-1 and 3-2 in section 3.2.

5 UUT operates until tunnel is clear of all smoke. - Observe operator actions and record time until smoke has cleared the tunnel.

UUT was shut down prior to total clearing. Test operators were given poor information on progress of the smoke.

6 Operator 1 conducts situational assessment of incident site. - Observe and record all results.

OK.

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 27

Test Data Sheet for Test 2 Step # Observer Action Y N Not Observed Comments

7 Power down UUT and conduct baseline check of all systems functions. - Observe operator actions and record all results.

OK.

8 End Test. - No observations.

OK.

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 28

Test Data Sheet Test Series: CNR02-06-01 Test Organization: 130th WVANG FD Test Procedure Number: 3 Test Name: PPV (North to South) Operational Testing Test Location: CNR, Standard, WV Test Start Point: Outside North portal entrance Date: 27 June 2002 Test Time (Start – End): 13:58 - 14:22 Test Controller Name: Mickey Kirschenbaum, Allison Voight, Brendon LaTurno, Howard Murphy, Forrest Church and Dutch Thomas Operator(s) Name(s): SSgt Olaf Funfstuck II and SSgt William Allen Gannon

Environmental Conditions Light: 118 Lux Temperature: 70° Precipitation: Mist Humidity: High

Comments See Table 3-4 in Section 3.3 for a detailed test timeline.

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 29

Test Data Sheet for Test 3 Step # Observer Action Y N Not Observed Comments

1 Operator 1 conducts situational assessment of incident site. - Observe operator actions and record all results.

OK.

2 Operators position UUT 75 feet from North Portal Entrance. - Observe operator actions and record all results.

UUT was located 40 feet from entrance.

3 Operators power up UUT and conduct baseline check of all systems functions. - Observe operator actions and record all results.

OK.

4 Initiate PPV. - Observe operator actions. Record: (1) visual acuity at 1,400-foot marker and 2,800-foot marker (North Portal Entrance) and (2) wind speed at 700-foot marker, 1,400-foot marker, 2,100-foot marker, and 2,800-foot marker (North Portal Entrance).

See Tables 3-3 in section 3.4.

5 UUT operates until tunnel is clear of all smoke. - Observe operator actions and record time until smoke has cleared the tunnel.

See tables 3-3 in section 3.4.

6 Operator 1 conducts situational assessment of incident site. - Observe and record all results.

OK.

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 30

Test Data Sheet for Test 3 Step # Observer Action Y N Not Observed Comments

7 Power down UUT and conduct baseline check of all systems functions. - Observe operator actions and record all results.

OK.

8 End Test. - No observations.

OK.

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 31

Test Data Sheet Test Series: CNR02-06-01 Test Organization: 130th WVANG FD Test Procedure Number: 4 Test Name: PPV (Moving North) Operational Testing Test Location: CNR, Standard, WV Test Start Point: 100 feet inside South portal entrance Date: 27 June 2002 Test Time (Start – End): 11:22 - 12:01 Test Controller Name: Mickey Kirschenbaum, Allison Voight, Brendon LaTurno, Howard Murphy, Forrest Church and Dutch Thomas Operator(s) Name(s): SSgt Olaf Funfstuck II and SSgt William Allen Gannon

Environmental Conditions Light: 118 Lux Temperature: 70° Precipitation: None Humidity: High

Comments Prior to testing, test operators, test controllers, and the manufacturer’s representatives determined that leaving the unit stationary instead of moving it north would provide a better test of the UUT and a more realistic testing scenario. See Tables 3-5 and 3-6 in Section 3.4 for detailed test timelines.

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 32

Test Data Sheet for Test 4 Step # Observer Action Y N Not Observed Comments

1 Operator 1 conducts situational assessment of incident site. - Observe operator actions and record all results.

OK.

2 Operators position UUT at South Portal Entrance. - Observe operators actions and record all results.

OK. No difficulty observed.

3 Operators power up UUT and conduct baseline check of all systems functions. - Observe operators actions and record all results.

OK.

4 Initiate PPV. - Observe operator actions and record wind speed at 1,400-foot marker.

Optimal PPV was not attainable.

5 Move UUT to 100-foot marker. - Observe and record wind speed at 1,400-foot marker.

UUT was started at 100-foot marker.

6 Move UUT to 200-foot marker. - Observe and record wind speed at 1,400-foot marker.

UUT remained at 100-foot marker for the duration of the test. This change was determined prior to testing.

7 Move UUT to 300-foot marker. - Observe and record wind speed at 1,400-foot marker.

UUT remained at 100-foot marker for the duration of the test. This change was determined prior to testing.

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 33

Test Data Sheet for Test 4 Step # Observer Action Y N Not Observed Comments

8 Move UUT to 400-foot marker. - Observe and record (1) wind speed at 1,400 foot marker and (2) visual acuity at 2,800 foot marker (North Portal Entrance).

UUT remained at 100-foot marker for the duration of the test. This change was determined prior to testing.

9 Move UUT to 500-foot marker. - Observe and record (1) wind speed at 1,400 foot marker and (2) visual acuity at 2,800 foot marker (North Portal Entrance).

UUT remained at 100-foot marker for the duration of the test. This change was determined prior to testing.

10 Move UUT to 600-foot marker. - Observe and record (1) wind speed at 1,400 foot marker and (2) visual acuity at 2,800 foot marker (North Portal Entrance).

UUT remained at 100-foot marker for the duration of the test. This change was determined prior to testing.

11 Move UUT to 700-foot marker. - Observe and record (1) wind speed at 1,400 foot marker and (2) visual acuity at 2,800 foot marker (North Portal Entrance).

UUT remained at 100-foot marker for the duration of the test. This change was determined prior to testing.

12 UUT operates until tunnel is clear of all smoke. - Observe operator actions and record time until smoke has cleared the tunnel.

See Table 3.6 in section 3.4.1.

13 Operator 1 conducts situational assessment of incident site. - Observe and record all results.

Ok.

14 Power down UUT and conduct baseline check of all systems functions. - Observe operator actions and record all results.

OK.

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 34

Test Data Sheet for Test 4 Step # Observer Action Y N Not Observed Comments

15 End Test. - No observations

OK.

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 35

Test Data Sheet Test Series: CNR02-06-01 Test Organization: 130th WVANG FD Test Procedure Number: 5 Test Name: Decontamination of Personnel Utilizing UUT and Misting Ring Test Location: CNR, Standard, WV Test Start Point: Outside South portal entrance Date: 27 June 2002 Test Time (Start – End): 15:25 - 15:30 Test Controller Name: Mickey Kirschenbaum, Allison Voight, Brendon LaTurno and Howard Murphy Operator(s) Name(s): SSgt Olaf Funfstuck II and SSgt William Allen Gannon

Environmental Conditions Light: Outside, Sunny Temperature: 72° Precipitation: None Humidity: High

Comments

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 36

Test Data Sheet for Test 5 Step # Observer Action Y N Not Observed Comments

1 Test Subjects are sprayed with florescent material. - Using black light, photograph sprayed areas.

Used Clue Spray.

2 Operators establish a decontamination area at the South Portal Entrance. - Observe operator actions and record all results.

Decontamination area was cleared prior to testing.

3 Operators position UUT with Misting Ring 75 feet from South Portal Entrance. - Observe operator actions and record all results.

OK.

4 Operators power up UUT and conduct baseline check of all systems functions. - Observe operator actions and record all results.

OK.

5 Initiate PPV with misting ring. - Observe operator actions. Record wind speed at 100, 150, and 200 feet from UUT and all results.

Wind speeds in water-stream was approximately 10 MPH.

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 37

Test Data Sheet for Test 5 Step # Observer Action Y N Not Observed Comments

6 Test Subject 1, positioned at the 500 foot marker, and Test Subject 2, positioned at the 1,000 foot marker walk toward the decontamination area at a normal pace. - Observe test subjects actions. Upon exiting the tunnel, record: (1) total time, (2) amount of moister on clothing, (3) areas of the body that were not affected by the UUT, and (4) physical condition of the test subjects.

Test subject walked from South Portal Entrance to decon area outside the tunnel. Water pressure prevented the subject from walking at a normal pace.

7 Using black light, check test subjects to determine if they were properly decontaminated. - Photograph sprayed areas and record all results.

Residual florescent was seen on the flight suit, under the arms, and on the backs of the test subjects in the Level A and B PPE.

8 Power down UUT and conduct baseline check of all systems functions. - Observe operator actions and record all results.

OK.

9 End Test. - No observations

OK.

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 38

Test Data Sheet Test Series: CNR02-06-01 Test Organization: 130th WVANG FD Test Procedure Number: 6 Test Name: Decontamination of Vehicles Utilizing UUT and Misting Ring Test Location: CNR, Standard, WV Test Start Point: Outside South portal entrance Date: 27 June 2002 Test Time (Start – End): 1538 - 1542 Test Controller Name: Mickey Kirschenbaum, Allison Voight, Brendon LaTurno and Howard Murphy Operator(s) Name(s): SSgt Olaf Funfstuck II and SSgt William Allen Gannon

Environmental Conditions Light: Outside, Sunny Temperature: 72° Precipitation: None Humidity: High

Comments

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 39

Test Data Sheet for Test 6 Step # Observer Action Y N Not Observed Comments

1 Vehicles are sprayed with florescent material. - Using black light, photograph sprayed areas.

A large SUV’s passenger side was sprayed with Clue Spray.

2 Operators position UUT with Misting Ring 75 feet from test vehicles. - Observe operator actions and record all results.

OK. Testing was conducted outside the South Portal Entrance.

3 Operators power up UUT and conduct baseline check of all systems functions. - Observe operator actions and record all results.

OK.

4 Initiate PPV with Misting Ring for 5 minutes. - Observe operator actions. Record wind speed at 100, 150, and 200 feet from UUT and all results.

Due to limited water supply, PPV was only initiated for 4 minutes.

5 Cease PPV with Misting Ring. - Observe operator actions and record all results.

OK.

6 Using black light, check sprayed areas of vehicles. - Photograph sprayed areas and record all results.

Trace amounts of the simulated contaminant were detected without the aid of the black light, and, with the assistance of the black light, significant amounts of simulated contaminant concentrated in places where vehicle body panels and windows met.

7 If vehicles were not completely decontaminated, initiate PPV with misting ring for an additional 5 minutes. - Observe operator actions and record all result.

Decontamination was not continued due to limited water supply.

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 40

Test Data Sheet for Test 6 Step # Observer Action Y N Not Observed Comments

8 Cease PPV with misting ring. - Observe operator actions and record all results.

Decontamination was not continued due to limited water supply.

9 Using black light, check sprayed areas of vehicles. - Photograph sprayed areas and record all results.

See Step 6.

10 If vehicles were not completely decontaminated, initiate PPV with misting ring for an additional 5 minutes. - Observe operator actions and record all result.

Decontamination was not continued due to limited water supply.

11 Cease PPV with misting ring. - Observe operator actions and record all results.

Decontamination was not continued due to limited water supply.

12 Using black light, check sprayed areas of vehicles. - Photograph sprayed areas and record all results.

See Step 6.

13 If vehicles were not completely decontaminated, initiate PPV with Misting Ring for an additional 5 minutes. - Observe operator actions and record all result.

Decontamination was not continued due to limited water supply.

14 Cease PPV with Misting Ring. - Observe operator actions and record all results.

Decontamination was not continued due to limited water supply.

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 41

Test Data Sheet for Test 6 Step # Observer Action Y N Not Observed Comments

15 Using black light, check sprayed areas of vehicles. - Photograph sprayed areas and record all results.

See Step 6.

16 End test. - No observations

OK.

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 42

Appendix B - Test Photos

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 43

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 44

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 45

Appendix C - Operational Test Schedule

Start Time

Test Duration Minutes

Priority Test

Rotation

Test # Test Name Personnel Equipment Location

0800 90 - - CNR Brief and Tour None None Tunnel 0930 30 - - UUT Operation Training Juergen Bader and

Leroy Coffman MVU Tunnel

1000 60 1 2 PPV Operational Testing (South to North)

SSgts Olaf Funfstuck II and William Allen Gannon

MVU Tunnel

1100 60 3 4 PPV Operational Testing (Moving North)

SSgts Olaf Funfstuck II and William Allen Gannon

MVU Tunnel

1300 60 2 3 PPV Operational Testing (North to South)

SSgts Olaf Funfstuck II and William Allen Gannon

MVU Tunnel

1400 60 4 5 Decontamination of Personnel Utilizing Misting Ring

SSgts Olaf Funfstuck II and William Allen Gannon

MVU Tunnel entrance

1500 60 5 1 Baseline Test Forrest Church and Dutch Thomas

None Tunnel

1600 60 6 6 Decontamination of Personnel Utilizing Misting Ring

SSgts Olaf Funfstuck II and William Allen Gannon

MVU with Misting Ring

Tunnel entrance

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 46

Appendix D - UUT Specifications

48" MVU Specifications Total Length: 166 in. (4,217mm) Total Width: 75 in. (1,905mm) Total Height: 95 in. (2,413mm) Total Weight: 8,800 pounds (4,000 kilos)

Blower Assembly

Shroud Diameter: 48 in. (1,219mm) Shroud Length: 48 in. (1,219mm) Shroud Material: Steel Impeller: 7-blades, aluminum

Blower Performance

Impeller RPM: 1,450 maximum Air Output: 80,000 cubic feet per minute (130,000 ECFM) Air Velocity: 94 mph inside

85 mph at outlet 70 mph at 12 foot distance

Fan Adjustment Scissors Lift: 0” to 118” elevation (in 60 seconds) Rotation: 360 degrees, continuous Tilt Up: 35 degrees Tilt Down: 35 degrees

Hydraulic Control System

Impeller Motor: Hydrostatic fixed-displacement with auxiliary hydraulics. Scissors Lift: Hydraulic cylinder Rotation: Hydraulic gear pump Tilt Up/Down: Hydraulic cylinder

Hydraulic Specifications Tank Capacity: 20 gallons (72 liters)

Impeller Motor: Variable delivery pump 2,000 RPM 50 gallons/minute @ 2,900 psi (180 lpm @ 194 bar)

Fan Movements: Internal gear pump 1,000 RPM 3 gallons/minute @ 2,900 psi (11 lpm @ 194 bar)

Diesel Engine

Model: Cummins Diesel, 6BT-137 Power: 126 hp @ 2,100 RPM (Turbo Charged) Fuel Tank: 52 gallons (188 liters) Run Time: 8 hours

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 47

Control Systems (Electric and Electric over Hydraulic) Fixed Panel with controls: Engine/fan RPM

Gauges for temperature/oil pressure Hydraulic control pressure Panel light 24v DC socket Emergency shut-down switch

Remote Control: Portable control box with 20 foot cable

Fan, start/stop Tilt, up/down Rotation, left/right Scissors, up/down Emergency shut-down switch

Water Mist System

Misting Ring: 1.5” diameter stainless steel, 8 nozzles Flow Rate: 87 gallons/minute @ 100 psi (300 lpm @ 7 bar) Reach: 130 feet Droplet Size: 200 microns Supply: Central duct system Coupling: 1.5” house coupling with shut-off valve

Body Work

Silencer hood mounted over diesel engine, hydraulic pump, reservoir, and oil cooler with roll-up door for access to control panel.

Service openings for engine. Safety Features

Emergency shut-down switch (entire system). Open grid steel fence running along both sides and end of the platform. Acoustic warning during lowering of fan unit.

Options Lowering System: Hydraulic lowering mechanism for the fan unit to reduce the overall height of the unit by 7”. Can reduce the height to legal limits for highway transportation when unit is mounted on a truck with a tall platform.

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 48

Appendix E - Points of Contact

Name Position Phone Number Email Jon Stewart Program Manager (703) 676-5602 [email protected] Jeb Benzing Deputy Program Manager (703) 676-5742 [email protected] Mickey Kirschenbaum Test Director (703) 676-5740 [email protected]

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 49

Appendix F - Acronyms and Abbreviations

AAR After-action Review AW Airlift Wing CNR Center for National Response CoMPIO Consequence Management Program Integration Office DoD Department of Defense IPLAN Implementation Plan MPH Miles per hour MVU Mobile Ventilation Unit NGB National Guard Bureau PPE Personal Protective Equipment PPV Positive Pressure Ventilation SAIC Science Applications International Corporation UUT Unit Under Test WMD Weapons of Mass Destruction WVANG West Virginia Air National Guard

C E N T E R F O R N A T I O N A L R E S P O N S E - O P E R A T I O N A L T E S T A N D E V A L U A T I O N P R O G R A M

CNR TEST REPORT 9 AUGUST 2002

REVISED 31 MARCH 2004 50

Appendix G - References

Tempest Technology Mobile Ventilation Unit Operation Manual http://www.tempest-edge.com/