CENTER FOR ECONOMIC STUDIES KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT LEUVEN The Amenity Value of the Italian Climate...
-
Upload
godwin-horn -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of CENTER FOR ECONOMIC STUDIES KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT LEUVEN The Amenity Value of the Italian Climate...
CENTER FOR ECONOMIC STUDIES
KATHOLIEKEUNIVERSITEIT
LEUVEN
The Amenity Value of the Italian The Amenity Value of the Italian ClimateClimate
David Maddison and Andrea Bigano
CENTER FOR ECONOMIC STUDIES
KATHOLIEKEUNIVERSITEIT
LEUVEN
Presentation’s PlanPresentation’s Plan
Introduction Hedonic Literature and Climate Data Empirical Analysis Results Conclusions
CENTER FOR ECONOMIC STUDIES
KATHOLIEKEUNIVERSITEIT
LEUVEN
Introduction: Valuing ClimateIntroduction: Valuing Climate
Climate Change is currently a hot and much debated global issue.
There is disagreement about ‘When’, ‘Where’ and ‘How’ Climate Change will affect us. This paper is a contribution to the ‘How’ part of the issue.
In particular, possessing a money metric measure of the impact of changes in climate, may prove especially useful given the question about whether the costs of preventing climate change are justified by the benefits.
CENTER FOR ECONOMIC STUDIES
KATHOLIEKEUNIVERSITEIT
LEUVEN
Introduction: Climate and its ValueIntroduction: Climate and its Value
in the House Market: Costs and Benefits
associated with particular climates are capitalised into property prices: we are prepared to pay more for living in a nice area.
in the Labour Market: Costs and Benefits
associated with particular climates are collaterised into wages: we ask compensation for working in unpleasant conditions.
•Climate is an important localised imput to many households activities.
•It influences health conditions, heating and cooling requirements, nutritional needs, leisure activities.
•Households are attracted to regions offering preferred combinations of local amenities, hence:
CENTER FOR ECONOMIC STUDIES
KATHOLIEKEUNIVERSITEIT
LEUVEN
Introduction: Introduction: Hedonic ModelsHedonic Models
Housing Market
Owner of house i ’s problem:
Labour and Housing Market
0XPMts
XuUMax
hi
i
.
,Q
Where the house price is ihhi PP Q
First order conditions then imply
k
hi
k qP
Xu
qu
Nk1i qqq Q
XqPqP
qhXuUMax
khkw
k
,,
Where the individual’ endowment is now
First order conditions then imply
kwkh
kXq
qPqPX
uq
u
MRS
kw qPM
CENTER FOR ECONOMIC STUDIES
KATHOLIEKEUNIVERSITEIT
LEUVEN
Introduction: Introduction: Hedonic Literature and ClimateHedonic Literature and Climate
If individuals are freely able to select from differentiated localities then the tendency will be for the costs and benefits associated with disamenities to become capitalised into house prices and wage rates.
Across different regions there must exist both compensating wage and house price differentials and the value of marginal changes can be discerned from hedonic house and wage price regressions.
Assumptions of the thoretical model: existence of equilibrium in the hedonic markets, perfect information, absence of relocation costs, existence of smoothly continuous trade-off possibilities
among all characteristics (internal solutions), existence of a unified market for land and labour .
CENTER FOR ECONOMIC STUDIES
KATHOLIEKEUNIVERSITEIT
LEUVEN
Introduction: Why Italy?Introduction: Why Italy?
This is the first study of this kind outside the U.S.A.; Economic, climatic, house and labour market data
are availiable at a good level of disaggregation; Italy’s geographic characteristics lead to a marked
variation in climate within a rather limited area. This allows us to use current day analogues for future
climate changes, presuming that long run cost-minimising adaptation has already occurred.
CENTER FOR ECONOMIC STUDIES
KATHOLIEKEUNIVERSITEIT
LEUVEN
Introduction: The Climatic Regions of ItalyIntroduction: The Climatic Regions of Italy
Source: Cantù (Landsberg ed.) (1969-1981)
1
2
35
8
7
6 4
1. Alpine Italy1. Alpine Italy
2. Po Valley2. Po Valley
3.3. Northern AdriaticNorthern Adriatic
4. Southern Adriatic4. Southern Adriatic
5.5. LiguriaLiguria
6. Tyrrenian Coast6. Tyrrenian Coast
77.Calabria and .Calabria and SicilySicily
8. Sardinia8. Sardinia
CENTER FOR ECONOMIC STUDIES
KATHOLIEKEUNIVERSITEIT
LEUVEN
Hedonic Literature and the Amenity Value of ClimateHedonic Literature and the Amenity Value of ClimateStudy Sample Dependent
Variable(s) Climate Explanatory Variables Other
Explanatory Variables Results
Hoch & Drake (1974)
86 SMSAs
Wages Winter and Summer Temperature, Precipitation, Wind Speed, Degree Days, Very Hot Days, Very Cold Days
Regional Dummies Racial Composition Urban Size
Climate variable Significant, but not in the first sub sample when regional dummies are considered.
Nordhaus (1996)
Wages Temperature and Precipitation in January, April, July and October.
Population Density, Latitude and Longitude, Presence of major water bodies. Tax structures and public goods accounted for.
Not conclusive
Robak (1982) 98 SMSAs
Wages Residential Site Prices
Snowfall, Degree Days Cloudy Days, Clear Days
Population Growth, Population Density, Unemployment Rates Crime Rates, Pollution (TSP)
Climate variables are significant with the expected sign in the wages regression, but not in the house prices regression
Smith (1983) 44 SMSAs
Wages Sunshine hours, Highest and
Lowest Temperature, Wind
Speed, Precipitation
Job Specific Characteristics, Site specific Characteristics
Only Sunshine significant
Hoen et al. (1987) Blomquist et al (1988)
285 SMAs
Wages House Prices
Sunshine Hours, Humidity, Heating Degree Days, Cooling Degree Days Wind Speed, Precipitation, Visibility
Coast Proximity Teachers-pupils Ratios, TSP, Crime Rates
Amenity variables significant. Only Sunshine was unambiguously valued.
Clark & Cosgrove
(1990)
564 U.S. Home
owners
House Prices Heating Degree Days, Cooling Degree Days, Rainfall
House characteristics, Amenities, Unemployment, Immigration, Location, Wages.
Hot weather and high levels of rainfall are compensated for by lover prices.
Clark & Cosgrove (1991)
6668 U.S. Movers
Wages Heating Degree Days, Difference between min January and Max July temperature, Rainfall, hours of sunshine
Coast Proximity, Amenities, Type of employment, Population density.
Rainfall is a significant disamenity, but the other climate variables are not significant.
CENTER FOR ECONOMIC STUDIES
KATHOLIEKEUNIVERSITEIT
LEUVEN
Data SourcesData Sources
Istituto Nazionale Previdenza Sociale provided Provincial data on expected labour income per worker;
Banca d’Italia provided Provincial data on national averaged after tax labour income and nationally averaged annual housing costs ;
A survey of provincial property prices per square meter is taken from Il Sole 24 Ore, a leading financial newspaper in Italy .
The climate data is taken from Leemans and Cramer . This database merges records drawn from a variety of published sources to create a terrestrial grid at the 0.5° level of resolution.
CENTER FOR ECONOMIC STUDIES
KATHOLIEKEUNIVERSITEIT
LEUVEN
Empirical Analysis: Variables’ Creation IEmpirical Analysis: Variables’ Creation I
Our dependent variable (D.V.) is defined as « expected after tax labor income net of housing cost ».
D.V.
Expected Provincial
after-tax
Labour income
Provincial housing costs for a
dwelling of constant dimensions
--
Provincial
Unemployment rate
Labour income
per worker
National after tax
Household Income
Nationally averaged
Housing Costs
Provincial
property prices /m2
CENTER FOR ECONOMIC STUDIES
KATHOLIEKEUNIVERSITEIT
LEUVEN
Empirical Analysis: Variables’ Creation IIEmpirical Analysis: Variables’ Creation II
•Temperatures are adjusted so that they correspond to the average elevation of each province (-0.6° C/100m);
• Dummy variables were included:
•Years
•Coast Proximity
•Alpine Italy
• Macro-Regions
•Major Cities
.Turin
CENTER FOR ECONOMIC STUDIES
KATHOLIEKEUNIVERSITEIT
LEUVEN
Variables included in the dataset 1Variables included in the dataset 1
Variable Mean Std. Dev. Minimum Maximum Definition
NETINC 17.5 2.3 9.3 24.6 Expected after tax labor income net of housing costs (M Lira)
JANPRECIP 86 36 32 230 Average precipitation in January (mm)
JULPRECIP 36 31 1 149 Average precipitation in July (mm)
JANTEMP 4.1 3.8 -7.3 10.9 Average mean temperature in January (°C)
JULTEMP 22.7 3 9.3 26.2 Average mean temperature in July (°C)
JANCLEAR 0.38 0.05 0.27 0.5 Average fraction of clear sky in January
JULCLEAR 0.66 0.07 0.46 0.81 Average fraction of clear sky in July
COAST 0.56 0.5 0 1 Unity if the province borders on the sea, zero otherwise
ALPINE 0.05 0.22 0 1 Unity if the province is in the Alps, zero otherwise
POPDEN 238 325 36 2662 Population density of the province (persons per km2)
LAT 4262 263 3650 4600 Latitude (x100)
LONG 1190 258 700 1800 Longitude (x100)Source. Leemans and Cramer , INPS, Banca d'Italia, and Il Sole 24 Ore del Lunedi.
CENTER FOR ECONOMIC STUDIES
KATHOLIEKEUNIVERSITEIT
LEUVEN
Variables included in the dataset 2Variables included in the dataset 2
Variable Mean Std. Dev. Minimum Maximum Definition
MILAN 0.01 0.1 0 1 Unity if the province is Milan, zero otherwise
ROME 0.01 0.1 0 1 Unity if the province is Rome, zero otherwise
NAPLES 0.01 0.1 0 1 Unity if the province is Naples, zero otherwise
TURIN 0.01 0.1 0 1 Unity if the province is Turin, zero otherwise
CENTRAL 0.25 0.25 0 1 Unity if the province is in Central Italy, zero otherwise
SOUTH 0.18 0.18 0 1 Unity if the province is in Southern Italy, zero otherwise
SARDINIA 0.04 0.04 0 1 Unity if the province is in Sardinia, zero otherwise
SICILY 0.09 0.09 0 1 Unity if the province is in Sicily, zero otherwise
DUM92 0.2 0.4 0 1 Unity if the year is 1992, zero otherwise
DUM93 0.2 0.4 0 1 Unity if the year is 1993, zero otherwise
DUM94 0.2 0.4 0 1 Unity if the year is 1994, zero otherwise
DUM95 0.2 0.4 0 1 Unity if the year is 1995, zero otherwise
CENTER FOR ECONOMIC STUDIES
KATHOLIEKEUNIVERSITEIT
LEUVEN
Empirical Analysis: RegressionEmpirical Analysis: Regression
Sample: Panel ( 95 provincial observations x 5 years). Functional form:
Non-binary variables are entered as both linear and quadratic variables (centered to avoid multicollinearity);
Linear, semilog and inverse specification were tested (Maddala). The linear model was the most likely to have generated the data;
Standard errors were corrected to account for likely intra-provincial correlation and are robust to heteroskedasticity;
Population density, likely to be endogenous, tourned out to be exogenous and was not instrumented;
2 alternative models were tested ( with or without longitude and latitude)
CENTER FOR ECONOMIC STUDIES
KATHOLIEKEUNIVERSITEIT
LEUVEN
Regression ResultsRegression ResultsLong. & Lat. inc. Long. & Lat. excl. Long. & Lat. inc. Long. & Lat. excl.
Parameter Coefficient Coefficient Parameter Coefficient Coefficient
109.4359 19.90963 -0.8880134 -0.9882339-3.46 -1.17 (-2.00) (-2.00)0.2825204 0.236183 -5.520199 -5.063282-1.32 -1.01 (-3.62) -2.820.0114957 0.0506542 -1.455395 -1.445131
-0.48 -2.03 (-1.41) (-1.64)0.6355427 0.3408511 -7.880024 -5.697631-2.73 -1.3 (-4.33) (-3.96)0.0210637 0.0080926 -33.67878 -21.13761
-1.01 -0.41 (-3.42) (-2.38)0.0338616 0.02021 -5.535101 -3.958793-2.6 -1.52 (-10.65) (-5.73)-0.0001205 -0.0000623 -0.0067318 -0.0051518
(-1.29) (-0.69) (-3.33) (-2.30)0.0415362 0.0001074 8.07E-06 5.15E-06-1.25 0 -3.38 -2.2-0.0003399 -0.0002748 -1.604921 -1.525399
(-1.44) (-0.99) (-1.44) (-1.91)-11.97623 18.15799 -4.756948 -3.409359(-1.19) -3.07 (-2.88) (-4.21)164.024 90.33523 -9.699294 -3.519012
-1.86 -1.12 (-3.80) (-2.41)-33.67762 -27.34107 -6.327532 -6.209634(-2.14) (-1.46) (-2.75) (-4.40)282.9566 61.30847 0.6742714 0.6742714
-2.9 -0.65 -12.66 -12.72-0.0171869 0.7844456 0.7844456(-2.89) -7.61 -7.64-0.000028 0.9398976 0.9398976(-2.68) -7.95 -7.99-0.007514 1.959178 1.959178(-3.22) -19.06 -19.150.0000109
-2.81 R-Squared 0.64 0.552
DUM92
DUM93
DUM94
DUM95
CENTRAL
SOUTH
SARDINIA
SICILY
NAPLES
TURIN
POPDEN
POPDEN2
COAST
ALPINE
ROME
MILAN
LONG
LONG2
JULCLEAR2
LAT
LAT2
JULPRECIP2
JANCLEAR
JANCLEAR2
JULCLEAR
JULTEMP2
JANPRECIP
JANPRECIP2
JULPRECIP
CONST
JANTEMP
JANTEMP2
JULTEMP
CENTER FOR ECONOMIC STUDIES
KATHOLIEKEUNIVERSITEIT
LEUVEN
The welfare impact of marginal changes in climateThe welfare impact of marginal changes in climate
Note: Euro / household / year. T-statistics are in parentheses
Milan Rome Naples Cagliari Palermo
January Temperature (°C) -99.68 -199.35 -207.62 -206.58 -199.35(-0.61) (-1.44) (-1.39) (-1.40) (-1.44)
July Temperature (°C) -334.66 -367.20 -367.20 -373.91 -380.63(-2.74) (-2.71) (-2.71) (-2.69) (-2.67)
January Precipitation (mm) -21.69 -17.04 -13.43 -19.11 -15.49(-2.24) (-2.63) (-3.24) (-2.44) (-2.89)
July Precipitation (mm) -22.21 -29.95 -30.99 -32.54 -32.54(-1.27) (-1.46) (-1.48) (-1.50) (-1.50)
January Clear Skies (%) 163.72 -228.79 279.40 -228.79 -736.98(-2.25) (-0.31) (-0.50) (-0.31) (-0.79)
July Clear Skies (%) 320.20 56.81 277.85 -890.89 -1475.52(-3.06) (-0.69) (-0.33) (-0.83) (-1.21)
CENTER FOR ECONOMIC STUDIES
KATHOLIEKEUNIVERSITEIT
LEUVEN
ConclusionsConclusions There is considerable empirical support for the hypothesis
that information on the amenity value of climate is contained in the market for housing and labour in Italy;
It appears that Italians regard the high July temperatures that they experience as a disamenity and similarly for high levels of precipitation in January. Insofar as future climate change is predicted to result in an increase in both, it threatens to bring a considerable reduction in amenity values to Italian households.
Qualifications: Relevant climate variables not included; Some arbitrariety in the choice of explanatory variables; Results are very sensitive to geographical features Non-marginal changes still to be identified.