Cemef October, 11th 2018, GDR TherMatHT, Lyon n n€¦ · Figure 1: Fluid dynamics close to a...
Transcript of Cemef October, 11th 2018, GDR TherMatHT, Lyon n n€¦ · Figure 1: Fluid dynamics close to a...
Cemef October, 11th 2018, GDR TherMatHT, Lyon n n
n Two-phase modeling using the phase fieldtheoryFranck Pigeonneau and Pierre Saramito (LJK, Grenoble)
1 / 33
1. Scientific issues in two-phase flows
2. Basics of the phase field theory
3. Numerical results of two-phase flows3.1 Droplet shrinkage3.2 Capillary rising3.3 Drop spreading on an horizontal wall
4. Conclusion and perspectives
2 / 33
1. Scientific issues in two-phase flows
x
z
h(x)
U✓
liquide
air
Figure 1: Fluid dynamics close to a contact line.
I The velocity gradient is:
@u@z
⇡ Uh(x)
=U✓x
(1)
I The viscous dissipation is given by1:
�⌘ = ⌘
Z R
✏
✓@u@z
◆2
hdx = ⌘
Z R
✏
✓Uh
◆2
hdx = ⌘U2
✓ln✓
R✏
◆. (2)
1P. G. De Gennes: Wetting: Statics and dynamics, in: Rev. Mod. Phys.57.3 (1985), pp. 827–863.
3 / 33
1. Scientific issues in two-phase flows
I To remove the singularity:
Figure 2: Precursor film2.
2P.-G. De Gennes/F. Brochard-Wyart/D. Quéré: Gouttes, bulles, perles etondes, Paris 2005.
4 / 33
1. Scientific issues in two-phase flowsI To remove the singularity:
u
l s
Figure 3: Slippage of fluids on wall3.
3L. M. Hocking: A moving fluid interface. Part 2. The removal of the forcesingularity by a slip flow, in: J. Fluid Mech. 79.02 (1977), pp. 209–229.
5 / 33
1. Scientific issues in two-phase flows
I To remove the singularity:
Figure 4: Contact line of diffuse interface4.
4P. Seppecher: Moving contact lines in the Cahn-Hilliard theory, in: Int. J.Engng Sci. 34.9 (1996), pp. 977–992.
6 / 33
2. Basics of the phase field theory I
I Each phase is marked by a “phase field” or “orderparameter”: '.
I ' = 1 in phase 1 (⇢1, ⌘1) and ' = �1 in phase 2 (⇢2, ⌘2).
Figure 5: Shear flow with two phases.
⇢ =⇢1 + ⇢2
2+
⇢1 � ⇢22
'. (3)
I The free energy is written as follows5
7 / 33
2. Basics of the phase field theory II
J. D. van derWaals
(1837-1923).
F ['] =
Z
⌦
(') +
k2||r'||2
�dV . (4)
I (') is a double-well potential.
-2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 20
0.25
0.5
0.75
1
1.25
1.5
1.75
2
2.25
�
Figure 6: Example of a double-well potential: = k(1 � '2)2/(4⇣2).
5J. D. van der Waals: The thermodynamic theory of capillarity under thehypothesis of a continuous variation of density, in: Verhandel. Konink. Akad.Weten. 1 (1893), pp. 1–56.
8 / 33
2. Basics of the phase field theory
I At equilibrium, F ['] has to be minimal.
�F ['] =
Z
⌦
✓d d'
� kr2'
◆�'dV +
Z
�⌦
@'
@n�'dS. (5)
I Consequently:
µ(') =d d'
� kr2' = 0, 8x 2 ⌦, (6)
k@'
@n= 0, sur �⌦. (7)
I µ(') is the chemical potential.
9 / 33
2. Basics of the phase field theory
I In 1-dimension and with the previous double-well potential,the phase field is given by:
'(x) = tanh✓
xp2 Cn
◆, (8)
x =xL, (9)
Cn = ⇣L , Cahn number. (10)
I The surface tension is then defined by
� =kL
Z 1
�1
✓d'dx
◆2dx =
2p
2k3⇣
. (11)
10 / 33
2. Basics of the phase field theory
I Outside the equilibrium, Cahn and Hilliard6 proposed
@'
@t= �r · J, (12)
J = �Mrµ, (13)
µ(') =d d'
� kr2'. (14)
I Time behavior of the phase field due to the diffusion of thechemical potential.
I Investigating spinodal decomposition.
6J. W. Cahn/J. E. Hilliard: Free Energy of a Nonuniform System. I.Interfacial Free Energy, in: J. Chem. Phys. 28.2 (1958), pp. 258–267.
11 / 33
2. Basics of the phase field theory
Numerical simulation of a spinodal decomposition in 2D,Cn = 10�2.
12 / 33
2. Basics of the phase field theory I
Fluid 1
Fluid 2
Wall
✓s
Figure 7: Contact line between two fluids and a wall. The staticcontact angle is ✓s.
F ['] =
Z
⌦
(') +
k2||r'||2
�dV +
Z
@⌦w
fw (')dS. (15)
13 / 33
2. Basics of the phase field theory II
I The minimization of F [']7
µ(') =d d'
� kr2' = 0, 8x 2 ⌦, (16)
L(') = k@'
@n+
dfwd'
= 0, on @⌦w . (17)
J. W. Cahn(1928-2016).
fw (') = �� cos ✓s'(3 � '2)
4, (18)
k@'
@n=
3(1 � '2)�
4cos ✓s, on @⌦w .(19)
7J. W. Cahn: Critical point wetting, in: J. Chem. Phys. 66.8 (1977),pp. 3667–3672.
14 / 33
2. Basics of the phase field theory
I Outside the equilibrium, creation of force proportional toµr'.
I Stokes equations:
r · u = 0, (20)�rP +r · [2⌘(')D(u)] + ⇢(')g + µr' = 0, (21)
I Cahn-Hilliard equation:
@'
@t+r' · u = r · [M(')rµ(')], (22)
µ(') =�
⇣2
h'('2 � 1)� ⇣2r2'
i. (23)
15 / 33
2. Basics of the phase field theory
I Under dimensionless form:
r · u = 0, (24)
�rP +r · [2⌘(')D(u)] +BoCa
⇢(')g +3
2p
2 Ca Cnµr' = 0, (25)
@'
@t+r' · u =
1Pe
r2µ('), (26)
µ(') = '('2 � 1)� Cn2 r2',(27)
I Dimensionless numbers:
Bo =⇢1gL2
�, (28) Ca =
⌘1U�
, (29) Pe = U⇣2LM� , (30)
Cn =⇣
L, (31) ⇢̂ =
⇢2⇢1
, (32) ⌘̂ =⌘2⌘1
. (33)
16 / 33
3. Numerical results of two-phase flowsh3.1 Droplet shrinkage
I Study this effect of Cahn number on droplet shrinkage forfluids at rest.
Figure 8: A static droplet in a liquid at rest.
17 / 33
3. Numerical results of two-phase flowsh3.1 Droplet shrinkage
Figure 9: a/a0 vs. t for three Cahn numbers.18 / 33
3. Numerical results of two-phase flowsh3.1 Droplet shrinkage
I Small value of Cahn number prevents the shrinkage.I According to Yue et al.8, the critical radius below which the
shrinkage occurs is
rc =4
s21/6
3⇡V Cn, (34)
I rc = 0.7 for Cn = 10�1,I rc = 0.6 for Cn = 5 · 10�2,I rc = 0.4 for Cn = 10�2.
8P. Yue/C. Zhou/J. J. Feng: Spontaneous shrinkage of drops and massconservation in phase-field simulations, in: J. Comput. Phys. 223.1 (2007),pp. 1–9.
19 / 33
3. Numerical results of two-phase flowsh3.2 Capillary rising
r
z
0 0.5
�0.5
1@⌦N, top
@⌦N, bottom
@⌦D
Figure 10:Geometry of thecircular tube.
I The diameter of the tube is used ascharacteristic length.
I U chosen by balancing gravity ⇠ viscousforces ) U = ⇢gD2/�.
u = 0,@'
@n=
(1 � '2)p
2 cos ✓s
2 Cn,@µ
@n= 0, 8x 2 @⌦D, (35)
� · n = 0,@'
@n=
@µ
@n= 0, 8x 2 @⌦N, top, (36)
� · n = �(⇢̂+12)n,
@'
@n=
@µ
@n= 0, 8x 2 @⌦N, bottom. (37)
20 / 33
3. Numerical results of two-phase flowsh3.2 Capillary rising
I A numerical example has been done with:
✓s = 80�, Bo = 1, Cn = 10�2, Pe = 102. (38)
I Initially, the heavy fluid (1) is below z = 0:
'0(z, r) = � tanh✓
zp2 Cn
◆. (39)
21 / 33
3. Numerical results of two-phase flowsh3.2 Capillary rising
Capillary rising of water in a tube with a static contact angleequal to 4⇡/9.
22 / 33
3. Numerical results of two-phase flowsh3.2 Capillary rising
Figure 11: Contact line position as a function of time for ✓s = 80� andBo = 1.
23 / 33
3. Numerical results of two-phase flowsh3.2 Capillary rising
Figure 12: Geometry of the free surface, z vs. r , for ✓s = 80� andBo = 1.
24 / 33
3. Numerical results of two-phase flowsh3.2 Capillary rising
Figure 13: z-axis velocity component v vs. r , over an horizontal linelocalized right on the contact line.
25 / 33
3. Numerical results of two-phase flowsh3.2 Capillary rising
Figure 14: v/max(v) vs. ex ⇠ 4p
Pe right on the contact line for t = 2.5for Bo = 1 and Pe = 50, 102 and 103.
I The diffusion layer of µ ⇠ 1/ 4p
Pe as shown in9.9A. J. Briant/J. M. Yeomans: Lattice Boltzmann simulations of contact line
motion. II. Binary fluids, in: Phys. Rev. E 69 (3 2004), p. 031603.26 / 33
3. Numerical results of two-phase flowsh3.3 Drop spreading on an horizontal wall
0 0.5 1 1.50
0.5
1
fluid 1, ⌘1
fluid 2, ⌘2 = ⌘̂⌘1
� · n = 0, @'@n = 0, @µ
@n = 0
u = 0, @'@n = (1� '2)
p2 cos ✓s/(2Cn),
@µ@n = 0
�·n
=0,
@'
@n=
0,@µ
@n=
0
Figure 15: Geometry of a spreading drop of fluid 1 in the initialconfiguration.
27 / 33
3. Numerical results of two-phase flowsh3.3 Drop spreading on an horizontal wall
Drop spreading of a drop on a wall with ✓s = ⇡/6, Cn = 10�2
and Pe = 102.
28 / 33
3. Numerical results of two-phase flowsh3.3 Drop spreading on an horizontal wall
(a) t = 0.1 (b) t = 0.5
(c) t = 1 (d) t = 5
Figure 16: Velocity field in the neighbourhood of the triple line.
29 / 33
3. Numerical results of two-phase flowsh3.3 Drop spreading on an horizontal wall
Figure 17: Drop shape during the spreading at different times.
30 / 33
3. Numerical results of two-phase flowsh3.3 Drop spreading on an horizontal wall
I The theory of the dynamics of triple line has beendescribed by Cox10:
g(✓d , ⌘̂)� g(✓s, ⌘̂) = �Ca⇤ ln ✏, (40)
in which the function g(✓, ⌘̂) is given by
g(✓, ⌘̂) =Z ✓
0
d↵f (↵, ⌘̂)
, (41)
with
f (↵, ⌘̂) =2 sin↵
n⌘̂2
⇣↵2 � sin2 ↵
⌘+ 2⌘̂
h↵(⇡ � ↵) + sin2 ↵
i+ (⇡ � ↵)2 � sin2 ↵
o
⌘̂(↵2 � sin2 ↵) [⇡ � ↵+ sin↵ cos↵] +h(⇡ � ↵)2 � sin2 ↵
i(↵� sin↵ cos↵)
.
(42)
10R. G. Cox: The dynamics of the spreading of liquids on a solid surface.Part 1. Viscous flow, in: J. Fluid Mech. 168 (1986), pp. 169–194.
31 / 33
3. Numerical results of two-phase flowsh3.3 Drop spreading on an horizontal wall
Figure 18: The dynamic contact angle as a function of Ca⇤.Comparison between the numerical result and the Cox’s theory with✏ = 10�1.
32 / 33
4. Conclusion and perspectives
I Numerical solver to study two-phase flows using the phasefield theory11:
I Wetting properties of wall easy to take into account.I Dynamics and temporal behaviors well described:
I Capillary rising in a tube;I Drop spreading on a solid substrate.
I The physics is mainly controlled by two numbers:I Cn 10�2; Pe � 102.
I Introduce a “real” thermodynamics.I Applications:
I Phase separation of oxide glasses;I Bubble nucleation in glass former liquids.
11F. Pigeonneau/E. Hachem/P. Saramito: Discontinuous Galerkin finiteelement method applied to the coupled Stokes/Cahn-Hilliard equations, in:Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids under revision (2018), pp. 1–28.
33 / 33